Bioadhesive oesophageal bandages: protection against acid and pepsin injury

Ziverel for PPI-refractory reflux symptoms: efficacy and mechanisms of action in humans

OBJECTIVES

It is thought that esophageal hypersensitivity in combination with an impaired mucosal barrier function contributes to PPI-resistant reflux symptoms. Ziverel, a bioadhesive agent that coats the esophageal wall, was shown to have a positive effect on reflux symptoms. However, the mechanisms of action are unclear. We aimed to assess the effect of Ziverel on esophageal sensitivity to acid and mucosal barrier function.

METHODS

We performed a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial in PPI-refractory patients with reflux symptoms. Patients were assigned (1:1) to 14 days of Ziverel followed by 14 days of placebo or opposite treatment order. The effect was evaluated using acid perfusion tests, an upper endoscopy with electrical tissue impedance spectroscopy (ETIS) and esophageal biopsies. The primary outcome was the esophageal sensitivity based on perfusion sensitivity score. Secondary outcomes included mucosal barrier function and reflux symptoms and correlations between the different outcomes.

RESULTS

Perfusion sensitivity score was not significantly different during treatment with Ziverel (106 (73-115)) and placebo (102 (67-110)) (p = 0.508) along with total RDQ score (2.6 (1.9-3.3) vs 2.8 (1.6-3.5) p = 0.456). ETIS showed comparable values during treatment with Ziverel (13514 (8846-19734)Ω·m) and placebo (13217 (9127-24942)Ω·m (p = 0.650)). Comparing Ziverel and placebo no difference was seen in transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) 203 (163-267) Ω.cm2 vs 205 (176-240) Ω.cm2 (p = 0.445) and fluorescein flux 775 (17-6964) nmol/cm2/h vs 187 (4-12209) nmol/cm2/h (p = 0.638).

CONCLUSION

Ziverel did not show a benefit on acid sensitivity, reflux symptoms or esophageal mucosal integrity compared to placebo in PPI-refractory patients with reflux symptoms.Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Register number: NL7670.

Trends in gastroesophageal reflux disease research: A bibliometric and visualized study

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a disorder resulting from the retrograde flow of gastric contents into the esophagus, affects an estimated 10-30% of the Western population, which is characterized by multifactorial pathogenesis. Over the past few decades, there have been many aspects of uncertainty regarding GERD leading to an ongoing interest in the field as reflected by a large number of publications, whose heterogeneity and variable quality may present a challenge for researchers to measure their scientific impact, identify scientific collaborations, and to grasp actively researched themes in the GERD field. Accordingly, we aim to evaluate the knowledge structure, evolution of research themes, and emerging topics of GERD research between 2012 and 2022 with the help of bibliometric approaches.

Methods

The literature focusing on GERD from 2012 to 2022 was retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded of the Web of Science Core Collection. The overall publication performance, the most prolific countries or regions, authors, journals and resources-, knowledge- and intellectual-networking, as well as the co-citation analysis of references and keywords, were analyzed through Microsoft Office Excel 2019, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer.

Results

A total of 8,964 publications were included in the study. The USA published the most articles (3,204, 35.74%). Mayo Clin ranked first in the number of articles published (201, 2.24%). EDOARDO SAVARINO was the most productive author (86, 0.96%). The most productive journal in this field was SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (304, 3.39%). AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY had the most co-citations (4,953, 3.30%). Keywords with the ongoing strong citation bursts were transoral incision less fundoplication, eosinophilic esophagitis, baseline impedance, and functional heartburn.

Conclusion

For the first time, we obtained deep insights into GERD research through bibliometric analysis. Findings in this study will be helpful for scholars seeking to understand essential information in this field and identify research frontiers.

Pharmacologic treatment of GERD in adolescents: Is esophageal mucosal protection an option?

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is still a challenging and difficult to treat condition in children. Although acid suppression represents the mainstay of treatment in adolescents, it is not devoid of adverse events, especially in the long-term.

OBJECTIVES

In this investigation we explored a new therapeutic avenue in GERD, that is esophageal mucosal protection.

DESIGN

To this end, we performed an investigator-initiated, retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a short-term treatment with Esoxx™ medical device in 25 adolescents with GERD-related symptoms. This mucoadhesive formulation contains two natural mucopolysaccharides (sodium hyaluronate and chondroitin sulphate) and adheres to the esophageal mucosa, exerting a protective effect against refluxed gastric contents and allowing mucosal healing.

METHODS

Heartburn, epigastric burning and post-prandial regurgitation were scored with a pain VAS scale and re-evaluated after 3-week treatment with Esoxx (one stick post-prandially, three times daily).

RESULTS

All patients completed the treatment without adverse effects and with good tolerability and compliance. All the three major symptoms significantly (p<0.001) improved after treatment. No patient required additional investigation (i.e. upper Gastrointestinal endoscopy) or medication (i.e. antisecretory drugs).

CONCLUSION

The results of this pilot study suggest that esophageal mucosal protection is a promising therapeutic avenue for GERD also in children. Provided, these data be confirmed by a large, randomized clinical trial, this medical device can enter our therapeutic armamentarium against this challenging disease.

Protective and regenerative effects of a novel medical device against esophageal mucosal damage using in vitro and ex vivo models

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common digestive disorder that causes esophagitis and injuries to the esophageal mucosa. GERD symptoms are recurrent during pregnancy and their treatment is focused on lifestyle changes and nonprescription medicines. The aim of this study was to characterize the mechanism of action of a new patented medical device, an oral formulation containing hyaluronic acid, rice extract, and amino acids dispersed in a bioadhesive polymer matrix, by assessing its protective effects in in vitro and ex vivo models of esophageal mucosa damage. Acidic bile salts and pepsin cocktail (BSC) added to CP-A and COLO-680 N esophagus cells were used as an in vitro GERD model to evaluate the binding capacities, anti-inflammatory effects and reparative properties of the investigational product (IP) in comparison to a viscous control. Our results showed that the IP prevents cell permeability and tight junction dysfunction induced by BSC. Furthermore, the IP was also able to down-regulate IL-6 and IL-8 mRNA expression induced by BSC stimulation and to promote tissue repair and wound healing. The results were confirmed by ex vivo experiments in excised rat esophagi through the quantification of Evans Blue permeability assay. These experiments provided evidence that the IP is able to bind to the human esophagus cells, preventing the damage caused by gastroesophageal reflux, showing potential anti-irritative, soothing, and reparative properties.

Pharmacologic treatment of GERD: Where we are now, and where are we going?

The introduction of acid inhibition in clinical practice has revolutionized the management of acid-related diseases, leading to the virtual abolition of elective surgery for ulcer disease and relegating antireflux surgery to patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) not adequately managed by medical therapy. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the antisecretory drugs of choice for the treatment of reflux disease. However, these drugs still leave some unmet clinical needs in GERD. PPI-refractoriness is common, and persistent symptoms are observed in up to 40-55% of daily PPI users. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) clearly overcome many of the drawbacks and limitations of PPIs, achieving rapid, potent, and prolonged acid suppression, offering the opportunity to address many of the unmet needs. In recent years, it has been increasingly recognized that impaired mucosal integrity is involved in the pathogenesis of GERD. As a consequence, esophageal mucosal protection has emerged as a new, promising therapeutic avenue. When P-CABS are used as add-on medications to standard treatment, a growing body of evidence suggests a significant additional benefit, especially in the relief of symptoms not responding to PPI therapy. On the contrary, reflux inhibitors are considered a promise unfulfilled, and prokinetic agents should only be used on a case-by-case basis.

Duodenogastroesophageal reflux and its effect on extraesophageal tissues: A review

We conducted a literature review to identify elements of duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER)—namely pancreatic fluids, hydrochloric acid, pepsin, and bile—as to the effects each has when refluxed to the extraesophageal structures. Further, we wished to acquaint clinicians with the possibilities that, in addition to hydrochloric acid, the other components of DGER are likewise contributing to disease in the extraesophageal areas. Our review included studies that have indicated reflux of the above mentioned components of DGER to the pharynx, larynx, tracheobronchial tree, oral cavity, nasopharynx, nose and sinuses, eustachian tube, and middle ear. Findings demonstrate that injury to the upper aerodigestive tract can occur from a variety of substances secreted from the stomach and duodenum. Treatment for DGER is nonspecific. We conclude that patients with an incomplete response to acid suppression may have significant involvement of pepsin, bile, or both. Future studies are needed to clarify the importance of these elements and to suggest more precise treatments.

Synthesis, Comparison, and Optimization of a Humic Acid-Quat10 Polyelectrolyte Complex by Complexation-Precipitation versus Extrusion-Spheronization

A novel humic acid and polyquaternium-10 polyelectrolyte complex (PEC) was synthesized utilizing two methods and the solubility and permeability of efavirenz (EFV) were established. Complexation-precipitation and extrusion-spheronization were used to synthesize and compare the drug-loaded PECs. The chemical integrity, thermo-mechanical differences, and morphology between the drug-loaded PECs produced by the two methods were assessed by attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared, differential scanning calorimetry, and SEM. The extent of drug solubilization was determined using the saturation solubility test while the biocompatibility of both PECs was confirmed by cytotoxicity studies on human adenocarcinoma cells (caco2). Bio-relevant media was used for the solubility and permeability analysis of the optimized PEC formulations for accurate assessment of formulation performance. Ritonavir (RTV) was loaded into the optimized formulation to further corroborate the impact of the PEC on the solubility and permeability properties of a poorly soluble and poorly permeable drug. The optimized EFV-loaded PEC and the RTV-loaded PEC exhibited 14.16 ± 2.81% and 4.39 ± 0.57% increase in solubility, respectively. Both PECs were compared to currently marketed formulations. Intestinal permeation results revealed an enhancement of 61.24 ± 6.92% for EFV and 38.78 ± 0.50% for RTV. Although both fabrication methods produced PECs that enhanced the solubility and permeability of the model Biopharmaceutics Classification System Class II and IV drugs, extrusion-spheronization was selected as most optimal based on the higher solubility and permeability improvement and the impact on caco2 cell viability.

Drugs for improving esophageal mucosa defense: where are we now and where are we going?

In the past, the attention of physiologists and doctors has been mainly focused on the key role of acid in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but increasing evidence that 20-40% of reflux patients respond not at all or only partially to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has underlined the concept that factors other than acid are implicated in its development and the elicitation of symptoms. Among these, impaired mucosal integrity, particularly in most patients with non-erosive reflux disease, has recently been reincluded and the reinforcement of defensive mechanisms and/or its protection has been reappointed as a renewed therapeutic target for the management of GERD patients. In this review we will summarize the existing knowledge of the old and novel compounds able to produce this therapeutic effect, including sucralfate, alginate-based drugs, and a new medical device consisting of hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate dispersed in a bioadhesive carrier, together with the potential indications for their use. It is to be stressed, however, that, although these compounds may represent a real alternative to PPI therapy in GERD, the combination of mucosal protection with acid suppression may help manage many cases with a partial or unsatisfactory response to PPIs alone.

The therapeutic efficacy of allyl isothiocyanate in cows with bovine digital dermatitis

Bovine digital dermatitis (BDD) is the most prevalent infectious cause of lameness in cattle. Because Treponema infection is a major etiology of BDD, the most common treatment of BDD is an antibiotic. Nonetheless, dairy cows require a withdrawal period after antibiotic treatment before their milk can be marketed. To address the problem, in this study, we tested whether 3 nonantibiotic agents (used separately)—allyl isothiocyanate (AITC), sodium alginate, and calcium hydroxide—alleviate BDD lesions in dairy cows. The AITC treatment improved the BDD lesions, whereas the sodium alginate and calcium hydroxide treatments did not. Therapeutic efficacy of AITC was similar to that of lincomycin, a topical antibiotic prescribed for BDD. These results suggest that AITC is a promising nonantibiotic agent for BDD treatment in dairy cows.

Randomised clinical trial: mucosal protection combined with acid suppression in the treatment of non-erosive reflux disease - efficacy of Esoxx, a hyaluronic acid-chondroitin sulphate based bioadhesive formulation

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown that patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) are less responsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) than those with erosive disease as they belong to different subgroups, in whom factors other than acid can trigger symptoms.

AIM

To evaluate whether combined therapy (mucosal protection plus acid suppression) would improve symptom relief compared to PPI treatment alone.

METHODS

In a multicenter, randomised, double-blind trial, 154 patients with NERD were randomised to receive Esoxx (Alfa Wassermann, Bologna, Italy), a hyaluronic acid-chondroitin sulphate based bioadhesive formulation, or placebo, in addition to acid suppression with standard dose PPIs for 2 weeks. Symptoms (heartburn, acid regurgitation, retrosternal pain and acid taste in the mouth) and health-related quality of life (HRQL) were evaluated before and after treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with at least a 3-point reduction in the total symptom score.

RESULTS

At the end of treatment, the primary endpoint was reached by 52.6% of patients taking Esoxx compared to 32.1% of those given placebo (P < 0.01). The same was true also for HRQL, evaluated by means of the Short Form-36 questionnaire, which improved with both treatments, but some items were significantly better after Esoxx plus PPI therapy.

CONCLUSION

The synergistic effect of Essox with PPI treatment suggests that mucosal protection added to acid suppression could improve symptoms and HRQL in NERD patients.

Topical protection of human esophageal mucosal integrity

Patients with nonerosive reflux disease exhibit impaired esophageal mucosal integrity, which may underlie enhanced reflux perception. In vitro topical application of an alginate solution can protect mucosal biopsies against acid-induced changes in transepithelial electrical resistance (TER). We aimed to confirm this finding in a second model using 3D cell cultures and to assess prolonged protection in a biopsy model. We assessed the protective effect of a topically applied alginate solution 1 h after application. 3D cell cultures were grown by using an air-liquid interface and were studied in Ussing chambers. The apical surface was "protected" with 200 μl of either alginate or viscous control or was unprotected. The tissue was exposed to pH 3 + bile acid solution for 30 min and TER change was calculated. Distal esophageal mucosal biopsies were taken from 12 patients and studied in Ussing chambers. The biopsies were coated with either alginate or viscous control solution. The biopsies were then bathed in pH 7.4 solution for 1 h. The luminal chamber solution was replaced with pH 2 solution for 30 min. Percentage changes in TER were recorded. In five biopsies fluorescein-labeled alginate solution was used to allow immunohistological localization of the alginate after 1 h. In the cell culture model, alginate solution protected tissue against acid-induced change in TER. In biopsies, 60 min after protection with alginate solution, the acidic exposure caused a -8.3 ± 2.2% change in TER compared with -25.1 ± 4.5% change after protection with the viscous control (P < 0.05). Labeled alginate could be seen coating the luminal surface in all cases. In vitro, alginate solutions can adhere to the esophageal mucosa for up to 1 h and exert a topical protectant effect. Durable topical protectants can be further explored as first-line/add-on therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Improved physical and in vitro digestion stability of a polyelectrolyte delivery system based on layer-by-layer self-assembly alginate-chitosan-coated nanoliposomes

To improve lipid membrane stability and prevent leakage of encapsulated food ingredients, a polyelectrolyte delivery system (PDS) based on sodium alginate (AL) and chitosan (CH) coated on the surface of nanoliposomes (NLs) has been prepared and optimized using a layer-by-layer self-assembly deposition technique. Morphology and FTIR observation confirmed PDS has been successfully coated by polymers. Physical stability studies (pH and heat treatment) indicated that the outer-layer polymers could protect the core (NLs) from damage, and PDS showed more intact structure than NLs. Further enzymic digestion stability studies (particle size, surface charge, free fatty acid, and model functional component release) demonstrated that PDS could better resist lipolytic degradation and facilitate a lower level of encapsulated component release in simulated gastrointestinal conditions. This work suggested that deposition of polyelectrolyte on the surface of NLs can stabilize liposomal structure, and PDS could be developed as a formulation for delivering functional food ingredients in the gastrointestinal tract.

Effect of gastric environment on Helicobacter pylori adhesion to a mucoadhesive polymer

Helicobacter pylori infection has been associated with several gastric diseases. This bacterium colonizes the gastric mucosa of half of the world's population, and available treatments are unsuccessful in practically one in every five patients. Mucoadhesive polymers, such as chitosan, are being investigated as gastric drug delivery systems. However, since chitosan is also known for its antimicrobial properties, this work aims to evaluate H. pylori interactions with chitosan under simulated gastric environments, namely using various pHs (2.6, 4 and 6), pepsin and urea. To enable the visualization of adherent bacteria, ultrathin chitosan films were produced by spin-coating on gold/glass surfaces, cross-linked with genipin and characterized by Fourier transform infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy, ellipsometry and electrokinetic analysis. Films with homogeneous thickness of 11.7±0.6 nm were produced, and were stable and protonated at all the pHs used. Furthermore, they adsorbed pepsin in all these pHs, in contrast to urea, of which a small adsorption was only observed at pH 6. H. pylori binding to chitosan was higher at pH2.6 although most of adherent bacteria were dead. The presence of pepsin decreased bacterial adhesion, but increased its viability while in a more stressed morphology (coccoid form). The presence of urea did not affect the amount, morphology or viability of chitosan-adherent bacteria. In suspension, the decrease in pH changed H. pylori zeta potential from negative to positive. Moreover, bacteria were only culturable when incubated in pH 6 with and without urea (without pepsin). This work demonstrates that chitosan has the capacity to bind and kill H. pylori in a range of pHs independently of urea. This opens new perspectives for the application of chitosan-based materials to the elimination of H. pylori gastric colonization, though pepsin might appear to be an obstacle.

Microencapsulation of bacteriophage felix O1 into chitosan-alginate microspheres for oral delivery

This paper reports the development of microencapsulated bacteriophage Felix O1 for oral delivery using a chitosan-alginate-CaCl(2) system. In vitro studies were used to determine the effects of simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and bile salts on the viability of free and encapsulated phage. Free phage Felix O1 was found to be extremely sensitive to acidic environments and was not detectable after a 5-min exposure to pHs below 3.7. In contrast, the number of microencapsulated phage decreased by 0.67 log units only, even at pH 2.4, for the same period of incubation. The viable count of microencapsulated phage decreased only 2.58 log units during a 1-h exposure to SGF with pepsin at pH 2.4. After 3 h of incubation in 1 and 2% bile solutions, the free phage count decreased by 1.29 and 1.67 log units, respectively, while the viability of encapsulated phage was fully maintained. Encapsulated phage was completely released from the microspheres upon exposure to simulated intestinal fluid (pH 6.8) within 6 h. The encapsulated phage in wet microspheres retained full viability when stored at 4 degrees C for the duration of the testing period (6 weeks). With the use of trehalose as a stabilizing agent, the microencapsulated phage in dried form had a 12.6% survival rate after storage for 6 weeks. The current encapsulation technique enables a large proportion of bacteriophage Felix O1 to remain bioactive in a simulated gastrointestinal tract environment, which indicates that these microspheres may facilitate delivery of therapeutic phage to the gut.

Preparation of dual crosslinked alginate–chitosan blend gel beads and in vitro controlled release in oral site-specific drug delivery system

Alginate-chitosan (ALG-CS) blend gel beads were prepared based on Ca2+ or dual crosslinking with various proportions of alginate and chitosan. The homogeneous solution of alginate and chitosan was dripped into the solution of calcium chloride; the resultant Ca2+ single crosslinked beads were dipped in the solution of sodium sulfate sequentially to prepare dual crosslinked beads. The dual crosslinkage effectively promoted the stability of beads under gastrointestinal tract conditions. The sustained release profiles of single and dual crosslinked gel beads loaded bovine serum albumin (BSA), a model protein drug, were investigated in simulated gastric fluid (SGF), simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) and simulated colonic fluid (SCF). In SGF, compared to Ca2+ single crosslinked beads, from which BSA released fast and the cumulative drug release percentages were about 80% of all formations in 4 h, the BSA total release from dual crosslinked gel beads was no more than 3% in 8 h. In SIF and SCF, Ca2+ single crosslinked beads were disrupted soon associating with the fast drug release. As to the dual crosslinked beads, the BSA total release from the ALG-CS mass ratio 9:1 (81.24%) was higher than that of 7:3 and 5:5 (less than 60%) in 8 h in SIF; the BSA release from all beads was much faster in SCF than in SIF. The dual crosslinked beads incubated in gastrointestinal tract conditions, the BSA cumulative release of ALG-CS mass ratios 9:1, 7:3 and 5:5 were respectively 2.35, 1.96, 1.76% (in SGF 4 h), 82.86, 78.83, 52.91% (in SIF 3 h) and 97.84, 96.81, 87.26% (in SCF 3 h), which suggested that the dual crosslinked beads have potential small intestine or colon site-specific drug delivery property.

Review article: human pepsins - their multiplicity, function and role in reflux disease

Human gastric juice contains a multiplicity of proteinases. These are classified as aspartic proteinases because of enzymic activity dependent on two oppositely placed aspartic acids in the active site region. At least seven zones of activity can be visualized by agar gel electrophoresis and a similar number of separate proteins resolved by high performance ion exchange chromatography. The major enzyme secreted (up to 70% of the total) pepsin 3b is sensitive to the selective inhibitor pepstatin whereas gastricsin or pepsin 5 (20% of the total) is not. Minor enzymes including pepsin 1, which has an associated proteincarbohydrate complex attached is variable and can be < 5% in normal and up to 20% of the total as in peptic ulcer patients. The activity of these enzymes depends on the substrate and pH with significant digestion occurring up to pH 4.5. It has also been shown that these enzymes can bind to substrates like collagen up to pH 5.5. In gastric secretion studies of patients with reflux oesophagitis the amount of pepsin and the profile of the enzymes in basal secretions, and that after pentagastrin stimulation, was found to be not different from healthy non-refluxers. Thus the problem with reflux is that gastric juice appears in the oesophagus, an area without any natural protection from proteolytic damage. The ability to reduce gastric secretion is therefore important in effective treatment. However, being able also to inhibit enzymic activity or protect substrates from damage using alginates offers considerable scope for future therapies.

Review article: the role of bile and pepsin in the pathophysiology and treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is a multifaceted and multifactorial disorder which results from the reflux of gastric contents into the oesophagus. Animal studies suggest that synergism between acid and pepsin and conjugated bile acids have the greatest damaging potential for oesophageal mucosa, although unconjugated bile acids may be caustic at more neutral pH. Human studies are compatible with a synergistic action between acid and duodenogastric reflux in inducing lesions. During prolonged monitoring studies, typical gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms are more related to acid reflux events than to non-acid reflux events. However, symptoms that persist during acid suppressive therapy are often related to non-acid reflux events. The therapeutic options for the non-acid component of the refluxate, including acid suppression, prokinetics, baclofen, surgery and mucosal protective agents like alginates, are discussed.