Combination ibandronate and radiotherapy for the treatment of bone metastases: Clinical evaluation and radiologic assessment

Computed tomography Hounsfield unit values as a treatment response indicator for spinal metastatic lesions in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study in Japan

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the impact of increased Hounsfield unit (HU) values for metastatic spinal lesions measured via computed tomography on the overall survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and identify factors associated with increased HU values in metastatic spinal lesions.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Previous studies have underscored the utility of the HU as a marker of treatment response in metastatic bone lesions. However, no prior studies have explored the relationship between HU changes in response to treatment and overall survival in patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

This study included a total of 85 patients between 2016 and 2021. Nonsurgical treatments were provided by the respiratory medicine department. HU values for metastatic spinal lesions were evaluated upon diagnosis of spinal metastasis (baseline) and at 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter. Patients were then divided into two groups based on the median HU increase from baseline to 3 months. Overall survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Based on the median change in HU value (124), 42 and 43 patients were categorized into the HU responder and non-responder groups, respectively. The median overall survival was significantly longer in the HU responder group than in the HU non-responder group (13.7 months vs. 6.4 months, p <0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the use of antiresorptive agents and molecularly targeted therapies were factors significantly associated with an increase in HU.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in HU values for metastatic spinal lesions after 3 months of treatment was correlated with a significantly longer overall survival in patients with NSCLC. Thus, HU measurements may not only serve as an easy and quantitative approach for evaluating treatment response in metastatic spinal lesions but also predict overall survival.

The Role of CT and MR Imaging in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of the Spine: From Patient Selection and Treatment Planning to Post-Treatment Monitoring

Spine metastases (SMs) are common, arising in 70% of the cases of the most prevalent malignancies in males (prostate cancer) and females (breast cancer). Stereotactic body radiotherapy, or SBRT, has been incorporated into clinical treatment algorithms over the past decade. SBRT has shown promising rates of local control for oligometastatic spinal lesions with low radiation dose to adjacent critical tissues, particularly the spinal cord. Imaging is critically important in SBRT planning, guidance, and response monitoring. This paper reviews the roles of imaging in spine SBRT, including conventional and advanced imaging approaches for SM detection, treatment planning, and post-SBRT follow-up.

Does re-ossification after palliative radiotherapy for spinal bone metastases help maintain vertebral body height?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

After palliative radiotherapy of spinal bone metastases, re-ossification is sometimes observed in bone with osteolytic changes. However, it remains unknown whether the re-ossification that is observed after radiotherapy is associated with preservation of vertebral body height.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether re-ossification observed after palliative radiotherapy can contribute to the preservation of vertebral body height.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective observational study.

PATIENTS SAMPLE

We investigated 111 vertebral bodies in 54 patients that underwent palliative radiotherapy at a single center for painful osteolytic/mixed metastatic spinal tumors in solid tumors between 2016 and 2020.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measures were the presence of re-ossification and vertebral body height reduction on the CT image.

METHODS

Re-ossification was evaluated according to the MD Anderson response classification criteria, and sagittal CT images were used to evaluate vertebral body height. A vertebral body ID was assigned to the irradiated vertebral body, and continuous CT images obtained for each vertebral body ID were evaluated. The median number of evaluation periods for each vertebral body was 4, and the total number of periods was 463. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate factors related to the occurrence of vertebral body height reduction before the subsequent CT. As a subanalysis, factors related to re-ossification were investigated.

RESULTS

The following primary cancer types were observed: lung cancer, 41 vertebral bodies; breast cancer, 19; renal cell cancer, 15; other, 36. A total of 62.2% showed re-ossification. The median time to confirmation of re-ossification by CT was 2 months. Factors significantly associated with vertebral body height reduction were presence of vertebral body height reduction before radiotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 6.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-63, p=.01) and no re-ossification (OR 137, 95% CI 22-3469, p<.01). Factors associated with re-ossification were the type of cancer and total radiation dose. Those with lung cancer and those with a total radiation dose of 20 Gy or less were more prone to re-ossification.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-ossification was observed in 62.2% of vertebral bodies after palliative radiotherapy for painful osteolytic/mixed metastatic spinal tumors. The re-ossification group demonstrated significantly less vertebral body height reduction when compared with the non-re-ossification group. The presence of re-ossification may potentially serve an important role in maintaining vertebral body height.

Local control of bone metastasis treated with palliative radiotherapy in patients with lung cancer: An observational retrospective cohort study

Bone metastasis is common in advanced lung cancer, with the incidence reported to be 30%, and radiotherapy (RT) is used for pain relief from bone metastasis. The present study aimed to identify factors affecting local control (LC) of bone metastasis from lung cancer and to assess the significance of moderate RT dose escalation. This was a retrospective cohort study, where LC of bone metastasis from lung cancer that had received palliative RT was reviewed. LC at RT sites was evaluated with follow-up computed tomography (CT). The influence of treatment-, cancer- and patient-related risk factors for LC was assessed. A total of 317 metastatic lesions in 210 patients with lung cancer were evaluated. The median RT dose (biologically effective dose calculated using an α/β of 10 Gy; BED10) was 39.0 Gy (range, 14.4-50.7 Gy). The median follow-up time for survival and median radiographic follow-up time were 8 (range, 1-127) and 4 (range, 1-124) months, respectively. The 0.5-year overall survival and LC rates were 58.9 and 87.7%, respectively. The local recurrence rate in RT sites was 11.0%, and bone metastatic progression, except in RT sites, was observed in 46.1% at the time of local recurrence or the last follow-up CT of the RT sites. According to multivariate analysis, RT sites, pre-RT neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), post-RT non-administration of molecular-targeting agents (MTs), and non-administration of bone modifying agents (BMAs) were significant unfavorable factors for LC of bone metastasis. Moderate RT dose escalation (BED10 >39 Gy) tended to improve the LC of RT sites. In cases without MTs, moderate dose escalation of RT dose improved the LC of RT sites. In conclusion, treatment (post-RT MTs and BMAs), cancer (RT sites) and patient (pre-RT NLR)-related risk factors had a large impact on improving the LC of RT sites. Moderate RT dose escalation seemed to have a small impact on improving the LC of RT sites.

Factors Affecting Survival and Local Control in Patients with Bone Metastases Treated with Radiotherapy

The aim of this study was to evaluate the expected prognosis and factors affecting local control (LC) of the bone metastatic sites treated with palliative external beam radiotherapy (RT). Between December 2010 and April 2019, 420 cases (male/female = 240/180; median age [range]: 66 [12-90] years) with predominantly osteolytic bone metastases received RT and were evaluated. LC was evaluated by follow-up computed tomography (CT) image. Median RT doses (BED₁₀) were 39.0 Gy (range, 14.4-71.7 Gy). The 0.5-year overall survival and LC of RT sites were 71% and 84%, respectively. Local recurrence on CT images was observed in 19% (n = 80) of the RT sites, and the median recurrence time was 3.5 months (range, 1-106 months). In univariate analysis, abnormal laboratory data before RT (platelet count, serum albumin, total bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase, or serum calcium level), high-risk primary tumor sites (colorectal, esophageal, hepatobiliary/pancreatic, renal/ureter, and non-epithelial cancers), no antineoplastic agents (ATs) administration after RT, and no bone modifying agents (BMAs) administration after RT were significantly unfavorable factors for both survival and LC of RT sites. Sex (male), performance status (≥3), and RT dose (BED₁₀) (<39.0 Gy) were significantly unfavorable factors for only survival, and age (≥70 years) and bone cortex destruction were significantly unfavorable factors for only LC of RT sites. In multivariate analysis, only abnormal laboratory data before RT influenced both unfavorable survival and LC of RT sites. Performance status (≥3), no ATs administration after RT, RT dose (BED₁₀) (<39.0 Gy), and sex (male) were significantly unfavorable factors for survival, and primary tumor sites and BMAs administration after RT were significantly unfavorable factors for LC of RT sites. In conclusion, laboratory data before RT was important factor both prognosis and LC of bone metastases treated with palliative RT. At least in patients with abnormal laboratory data before RT, palliative RT seemed to be focused on the only pain relief.

Local control of bone metastases treated with external beam radiotherapy in recent years: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Over the past decades, remarkable advancements in systemic drug therapy have improved the prognosis of patients with bone metastases. Individualization is required in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for bone metastases according to the patient's prognosis. To establish individualized EBRT for bone metastases, we investigated factors that affect the local control (LC) of bone metastases.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2019, 536 patients received EBRT for 751 predominantly osteolytic bone metastases. LC at EBRT sites was evaluated with a follow-up computed tomography. The median EBRT dose was biologically effective dose (BED10) (39.0) (range of BED10: 14.4-71.7 Gy).

RESULTS

The median follow-up time and median time of computed tomography follow-up were 11 (range 1-123) months and 6 (range 1-119) months, respectively. The 0.5- and 1-year overall survival rates were 73% and 54%, respectively. The 0.5- and 1-year LC rates were 83% and 79%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, higher age (≥ 70 years), non-vertebral bone metastases, unfavorable primary tumor sites (esophageal cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatobiliary/pancreatic cancer, renal/ureter cancer, sarcoma, melanoma, and mesothelioma), lower EBRT dose (BED10 < 39.0 Gy), and non-administration of bone-modifying agents (BMAs)/antineoplastic agents after EBRT were significantly unfavorable factors for LC of bone metastases. There was no statistically significant difference in the LC between BED10 = 39.0 and BED10 > 39.0 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding tumor-related factors, primary tumor sites and the sites of bone metastases were significant for the LC. As for treatment-related factors, lower EBRT doses (BED10 < 39.0 Gy) and non-administration of BMAs/antineoplastic agents after EBRT were associated with poor LC. Dose escalation from BED10 = 39.0 Gy did not necessarily improve LC.

Bone Density Changes Following Radiotherapy to Vertebral Metastases

Introduction

Patients have increasing longevity and time for bone healing following radiotherapy (RT) for treatment of bone metastases (BM). Attempts to assess the treatment response of bone metastases have been either limited or heavily subjective. Our goal was to try to quantitate cancer-involved bone changes after RT using changes in bone mineral density (BMD) from computer tomographic (CT) imaging.

Methods

Retrospectively, 117 spinal metastases were identified that received RT with follow-up CT scans >9 months following CT simulation. Contoured volumes included: the metastasis (gross tumor volume; GTV); the involved vertebra (gross bone volume; GBV); a total lytic volume (Lyt); a dominant lytic volume (Domlyt); a control volume, and the nearest uninvolved, unirradiated vertebra (control bone volume; CBV). The Hounsfield-density calibration curve was used to measure the density of these volumes before and after treatment.

Results

Whether using raw or control-adjusted changes, the absolute and percent change in density of the GBV, GTV, Lyt, and Domlyt volumes all significantly increased (each p<0.0001). The increase in the density of Domlyt volumes was greater than that of Lyt volumes (p=0.0465), which were greater than GTV (p=0.0065), which were greater than GBV (p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, only the biologically effective dose (BED) dose significantly correlated with GTV density change (p=0.0175). K means clustering created groups by initial lesion size, GTV, or GBV density. A significant difference in GTV density change was not detected between any groups.

Conclusion

Increases in BMD are associated with healing regardless of lesion size or initial density. A prospective study to determine whether long-term control is related to early density measurements is needed.

Diagnostic Imaging Modalities to Assess Treatment Response of Bone Metastasis in Patients Receiving Palliative Radiotherapy: A Scoping Review of the Literature

PURPOSE

Several studies have used objective radiologic data to assess the effect of palliative radiotherapy on tumor burden. The purpose of this literature review was to survey the various metrics that have been used to quantify bone tumor response to palliative radiotherapy by radiographical means and to determine whether any of these metrics were associated with clinical palliative outcomes.

METHODS

In accordance with PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, a literature search Ovid Medline and OldMedline from 1946 to February 6, 2019, Embase Classic/Embase from 1947 to 2019 week 5, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials February 2019 to extract articles related to quantified radiologic evaluation of bone metastases following palliative radiotherapy. Imaging modality, quantification metric, and association between imaging modality and clinical response were recorded.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles selected for full-text review utilized computed tomography (10 studies), fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (3 studies), magnetic resonance imaging (1 study), diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (3 studies), and X-ray (1 study) imaging modalities. Variables assessed included tumor volume regression, bone density, metabolic activity, and signal intensity. Studies differed both in the type of imaging modality used and metric derived to quantify the radiologic findings. Fifty percent of the included studies aimed to identify a relationship between a quantified radiologic metric and clinical palliative response. Of these studies, 86% reported a correlation.

CONCLUSION

Quantified radiologic metrics can provide an objective measure of response to palliative radiotherapy and may be useful in predicting clinical palliative response. More studies are needed to validate these metrics and develop a standardized protocol for radiologic evaluation that can be implemented into a clinical workflow.

Early response of bone metastases can predict tumor response in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with bone metastases in the treatment with nivolumab

The effect of nivolumab and the relation between bone response and tumor control in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with bone metastases are not clear. The outcome of nivolumab monotherapy was investigated, and whether the response of bone metastases is useful as an early predictor of tumor control in patients with NSCLC with bone metastases was examined. The participants included 15 patients who received nivolumab monotherapy for NSCLC with bone metastases in our institution between 2015 and 2017. Tumor control was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST1.1). Response of bone metastases was assessed by the MD Anderson response criteria (MDA criteria). Responses according to RECIST1.1 and the MDA criteria were classified as responder (complete response or partial response) and non-responder [progressive disease (PD) or stable disease]. Progression-free survival (PFS) was investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method. With RECIST1.1, the overall response rate was 20%. Multivariate analysis showed that the MDA criteria were the only risk factor for patients with PD (RECIST1.1). Median PFS was 1.9 months, with PFS of 20% at 6 months. Univariate analysis showed that being a non-responder according to the MDA criteria was the only risk factor for PFS. In patients who were responders (MDA criteria) within 3 months, PFS was 83 and 50% at 3 and 6 months, respectively, though all non-responder (MDA criteria) patients converted to PD (RECIST1.1) within 3 months. Response according to RECIST1.1 was significantly correlated with response according to the MDA criteria (P<0.05). In patients who were both responders according to RECIST1.1 and the MDA criteria, time to response with the MDA criteria (1.4-2.0 months) was earlier than with RECIST1.1 (2.8-3.0 months) in all patients. In conclusion, application of the MDA criteria within 2 months of nivolumab monotherapy is useful for early prediction of response and prognosis in patients with NSCLC with bone metastases.

Imaging response assessment following stereotactic body radiotherapy for solid tumour metastases of the spine: Current challenges and future directions

Patients with metastatic disease are routinely serially imaged to assess disease burden and response to systemic and local therapies, which places ever-expanding demands on our healthcare resources. Image interpretation following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spine metastases can be challenging; however, appropriate and accurate assessment is critical to ensure patients are managed correctly and resources are optimised. Here, we take a critical review of the merits and pitfalls of various imaging modalities, current response assessment guidelines, and explore novel imaging approaches and the potential for radiomics to add value in imaging assessment.

A prospective Phase II study for the efficacy of radiotherapy in combination with zoledronic acid in treating painful bone metastases from gastrointestinal cancers

We investigated the efficacy of combined radiotherapy (RT) and zoledronic acid in treating painful bone metastases from gastrointestinal cancers. Sixty patients were prospectively enrolled between November 2014 and July 2016. The most common primary cancer type was hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, n = 25), followed by colorectal cancer (n = 6). Patients received external beam RT of 30-54 Gy in 10-17 fractions or 20 Gy in 5 fractions for symptomatic bone metastases. On the first day of RT, patients received 4 mg intravenous zoledronic acid, which was repeated monthly for a total of six cycles. The mean pain score before treatment was 6.7, and it decreased to 2.8 at 1 month and 2.1 at 3 months (P < 0.001).The overall pain response rates at 1 and 3 months were 95% and 96%, respectively. Among the 24 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging, 71% were responders, with a complete response in 1 patient and partial in 16 patients. Combined treatment significantly decreased levels of macrophage inflammatory protein-1α and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and -3 compared with baseline (all P < 0.05). In HCC patients, IL-6 and MMP-9 levels were significantly lower 1 month after treatment (P < 0.05). The mean quality of life (QOL) score improved from 66 to 56 at 1 month (P < 0.001) and 55 at 3 months (P = 0.016). The median survival was 7 months. In conclusion, RT with zoledronic acid decreased bone pain and improved QOL in patients with painful bone metastases from gastrointestinal cancers. Radiographic findings and serum biomarker measurements were closely correlated with therapeutic responses.

Early response assessment of re-ossification after palliative conventional radiotherapy for vertebral bone metastases

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the therapeutic outcomes in patients with bone metastases receiving radiotherapy (RT), it is important to use objective radiological response criteria. The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in pain and re-ossification after RT for painful vertebral bone metastases without paralysis by malignant spinal cord compression.

METHODS

The participants included 55 patients who received RT for painful vertebral bone metastases without paralysis in our institution between 2012 and 2016. Bone modifying agents (BMAs) were administered in all patients. Follow-up assessments were done just before the start of RT and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months after RT. Radiological responses of irradiated vertebrae by RT were assessed by computed tomography (CT) using MD Anderson response classification criteria (MDA criteria) and the pain response was assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Response was classified as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), progressive disease (PD), and stable disease (SD).

RESULTS

The rates of CR were 2%, 7%, 20%, 30%, and 56% at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months, respectively. The rates of CR or PR were 15%, 49%, 77%, 91%, and 91% at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months, respectively. The rates of CR or PR were significantly higher in patients with breast cancer than in patients with lung cancer (p = 0.043). At one month, there was an association between the NRS and radiological response assessed by MDA criteria. There was a significant trend that, with a better response, there were more patients without pain (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Under BMAs administration, successful RT for vertebral bone metastases decreased pain and caused re-ossification. The MD Anderson criteria could be useful for assessment of radiological responses of irradiated vertebrae.

Therapeutic Irradiation: Consequences for Bone and Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue

Radiotherapy continues to be one of the most accepted medical treatments for cancer. Localized irradiation is the most common treatment for prostate, pancreatic, rectal, cervical and endometrial malignancies. Conventional localized fractions are total doses of 30-62Gy at 1.8-2Gy per fraction, with administration of ~60Gy often used for tumor ablation. However, even the lowest dose of localized irradiation exposure can result in adverse complications to adjacent organs, tissues, and vessels, which absorb a portion of the treatment. Skeletal complications are common amongst cancer patients undergoing these localized treatments. Irradiation exposure causes deterioration to the overall quantity and quality of bone by interfering with the trabecular architecture through increased osteoclast activity and decreased osteoblast activity. Irradiation-induced bone damage parallels adipocyte infiltration of the bone marrow (BM) resulting in compositional alterations of the microenvironment that may further affect bone quality and disease state. There may also be direct effects of irradiation on the BM adipocyte/pre-adipocyte, although in vitro findings do not always agree and cellular response is dependent on irradiation dosage. Hematopoietic cells also become apoptotic upon irradiation, which causes a range of skeletal effects. Bone loss leaves patients at a greater risk for osteopenia, osteoporosis, osteonecrosis, and skeletal fractures that drastically reduce quality of life. Osteoanabolic agents stimulate bone formation and reduce fracture risk in patients with low bone density; thus, osteoanabolic or anti-resorptive agents may be useful co-treatments with irradiation. This review discusses these topics and proposes further research directions using novel or combination therapies to enhance bone health during irradiation.

The role of radiotherapy in bone metastases: A critical review of current literature

Radiotherapy is considered the treatment of choice for painful bone metastases. However, novel modalities of radiotherapy have emerged in the concept of oligometastasic disease. In addition, the increase of overall survival of patients with bone metastatic disease in the last decades due to systemic treatments has issued the silent topic of re-irradiation. The aim of this manuscript was to present a current thorough search of relevant literature. Originally, 6,087 articles revealed from PubMed database related to radiotherapy and bone metastases. The first objective was to identify prospective randomised phase III studies dealing with bone metastases and which treated primary with radiotherapy. Abstracts and non-English citations were excluded. Twenty-three phase III clinical trials, 17 prospective studies and eight meta-analysis/systemic reviews matching with these criteria, were identified. Eleven randomised studies were comparing single dose fraction to multi-fraction schedules of radiotherapy. The overall response rates and complete response rates were not significant between the two arms. Re-irradiations rates were significantly higher for the single dose fraction arms. Stereotactic radiotherapy showed excellent tumour control rates more than 80%. All trials showed the equivalence of either single or multi-fractionated radiotherapy for metastatic bone lesions. Stereotactic irradiation is feasible and safe for oligometastatic disease. However, it seems that the single fraction of 8 Gy is superior to 4 Gy, in terms of efficacy.

Anatomic and functional imaging in the diagnosis of spine metastases and response assessment after spine radiosurgery

Spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) has recently emerged as an increasingly effective treatment for spinal metastases. Studies performed over the past decade have examined the role of imaging in the diagnosis of metastases, as well as treatment response following SSRS. In this paper, the authors describe and review the utility of several imaging modalities in the diagnosis of spinal metastases and monitoring of their response to SSRS. Specifically, we review the role of CT, MRI, and positron emission tomography (PET) in their ability to differentiate between osteoblastic and osteolytic lesions, delineation of initial bony pathology, detection of treatment-related changes in bone density and vertebral compression fracture after SSRS, and tumor response to therapy. Validated consensus guidelines defining the imaging approach to SSRS are needed to standardize the diagnosis and treatment response assessment after SSRS. Future directions of spinal imaging, including advances in targeted tumor-specific molecular imaging markers demonstrate early promise for advancing the role of imaging in SSRS.

Bone Density as a Marker of Response to Radiotherapy in Bone Metastatic Lesions: A Review of the Published Data

Metastases to the bone are presenting in a great percentage of patients with cancer, causing a variety of symptoms, affecting the quality of life and survival of patients. A multidisciplinary approach from different health providers is required for treatment, including radiation oncologists, medical oncologists and surgeons. The role of radiotherapy in the management of bone metastases has long been established through multiple randomized trials. The estimation of response to the therapy is subjective and is based on the palliation of the symptoms that the patients report. However, a quantification of the tumor burden and response to the treatment with the use of an objective method to measure those parameters is a clinical expectation in oncology. The change in bone density in affected areas (mainly lytic) after local radiotherapy, representing the cellular changes that have occurred, is a promising marker of response to treatment.

Diagnosis and treatment of bone metastasis: comprehensive guideline of the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, Japanese Orthopedic Association, Japanese Urological Association, and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology

Diagnosis and treatment of bone metastasis requires various types of measures, specialists and caregivers. To provide better diagnosis and treatment, a multidisciplinary team approach is required. The members of this multidisciplinary team include doctors of primary cancers, radiologists, pathologists, orthopaedists, radiotherapists, clinical oncologists, palliative caregivers, rehabilitation doctors, dentists, nurses, pharmacists, physical therapists, occupational therapists, medical social workers, etc. Medical evidence was extracted from published articles describing meta-analyses or randomised controlled trials concerning patients with bone metastases mainly from 2003 to 2013, and a guideline was developed according to the Medical Information Network Distribution Service Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2014. Multidisciplinary team meetings are helpful in diagnosis and treatment. Clinical benefits such as physical or psychological palliation obtained using the multidisciplinary team approaches are apparent. We established a guideline describing each specialty field, to improve understanding of the different fields among the specialists, who can further provide appropriate treatment, and to improve patients’ outcomes.

Re-irradiation for painful bone metastases - a systematic review

The purpose of this review was to determine the efficacy of re-irradiation in patients with bone metastases. A literature search was conducted in Ovid Medline, OldMedline, Embase, Embase Classic, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using relevant subject headings and keywords such as bone metastases, radiotherapy and palliative care. The resulting articles were sorted for inclusion for palliative external beam radiation retreatment response rate data. The literature search produced 2164 references and 15 articles were included in the final selection. Complete, partial and overall response rates were calculated to be 20%, 50% and 68%, respectively. Information on treatment toxicities was scarce. The efficacy of re-irradiation is comparable to initial radiation treatment. However, aspects of re-irradiation treatment including dose fractionation, related adverse events and toxicities require further corroboration.

Patient-reported outcome instruments used to assess pain and functioning in studies of bisphosphonate treatment for bone metastases

Purpose

When treating metastatic bone disease, relief of bone pain is often a key outcome. Because pain cannot be quantified with objective clinical measures, patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are required to assess patients' subjective experience. The goal of the current review was to examine measures used to assess pain, as well as the impact of pain on functional status and health-related quality of life (HRQL), in trials of bisphosphonates for the treatment of bone metastases.

Methods

A literature search focused on articles published from January 1999 to April 2009.

Results

A total of 49 articles were located that used PROs to assess pain-related outcomes of bisphosphonate treatment for bone metastases. The Brief Pain Inventory was the most commonly used multi-item instrument. However, the most common approach for assessing pain was to administer a single-item scale such as a visual analog scale, numerical rating scale, or verbal rating scale. Of the 49 studies, 19 included a PRO assessing functional status or HRQL.

Conclusions

Although pain is an important outcome of trials examining treatment for bone metastases, the current review suggests that there is little consistency in PRO measurement across studies. Furthermore, presentation of measures often lacked clear description, information on measurement properties, citations, clarity regarding method of administration, and consistent instrument names. Recommendations are provided for instrument validation within the target population, assessment of content validity, use of PRO instruments recently developed for patients with bone metastases, clear description of instruments, and implementation of measures consistent with recommendations from instrument developers.

Palliative radiation therapy in the management of brain metastases, spinal cord compression, and bone metastases

Radiation therapy plays an important role in both curative and palliative cancer treatment. Palliative radiation therapy is given to alleviate symptoms, restore function, relieve suffering caused by cancer, and improve quality of life. Pain relief, control of bleeding or ulceration, prevention of impending compression or obstruction from tumor, and shrinkage of tumor masses causing symptoms are indications for palliative radiotherapy. Palliative radiotherapy is a very effective tool in alleviating pain symptoms and generally well tolerated. Common fractionation schemes are 8 Gy delivered in one fraction and 30 Gy delivered in 10 fractions. This article discusses general principles of administering palliative radiation therapy. Site-specific treatment is addressed, divided into palliative radiotherapy for brain metastases, spinal cord compression, and bone metastases. In each of these areas, we discuss presentation, management, and therapeutic strategies.

Zoledronic acid preserves bone structure and increases survival but does not limit tumour incidence in a prostate cancer bone metastasis model

BACKGROUND

The bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid (ZOL), can inhibit osteoclasts leading to decreased osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast activity in bone. Here, we used a mixed osteolytic/osteoblastic murine model of bone-metastatic prostate cancer, RM1(BM), to determine how inhibiting osteolysis with ZOL affects the ability of these cells to establish metastases in bone, the integrity of the tumour-bearing bones and the survival of the tumour-bearing mice.

METHODS

The model involves intracardiac injection for arterial dissemination of the RM1(BM) cells in C57BL/6 mice. ZOL treatment was given via subcutaneous injections on days 0, 4, 8 and 12, at 20 and 100 µg/kg doses. Bone integrity was assessed by micro-computed tomography and histology with comparison to untreated mice. The osteoclast and osteoblast activity was determined by measuring serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAP 5b) and osteocalcin, respectively. Mice were euthanased according to predetermined criteria and survival was assessed using Kaplan Meier plots.

FINDINGS

Micro-CT and histological analysis showed that treatment of mice with ZOL from the day of intracardiac injection of RM1(BM) cells inhibited tumour-induced bone lysis, maintained bone volume and reduced the calcification of tumour-induced endochondral osteoid material. ZOL treatment also led to a decreased serum osteocalcin and TRAP 5b levels. Additionally, treated mice showed increased survival compared to vehicle treated controls. However, ZOL treatment did not inhibit the cells ability to metastasise to bone as the number of bone-metastases was similar in both treated and untreated mice.

CONCLUSIONS

ZOL treatment provided significant benefits for maintaining the integrity of tumour-bearing bones and increased the survival of tumour bearing mice, though it did not prevent establishment of bone-metastases in this model. From the mechanistic view, these observations confirm that tumour-induced bone lysis is not a requirement for establishment of these bone tumours.

Bone metastases: assessment of therapeutic response through radiological and nuclear medicine imaging modalities

Radiological and nuclear medicine imaging modalities used for assessing bone metastases treatment response include plain and digitalised radiography (XR), skeletal scintigraphy (SS), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and PET/CT. Here we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these assessment modalities as evident through different clinical trials. Additionally, we present the more established response criteria of the International Union Against Cancer and the World Health Organization and compare them with newer MD Anderson criteria. Even though serial XR and SS have been used to assess the therapeutic response for decades, several months are required before changes are evident. Newer techniques, such as MRI or PET, may allow an earlier evaluation of response that may be quantified through monitoring changes in signal intensity and standard uptake value, respectively. Moreover, the application of PET/CT, which can follow both morphological and metabolic changes, has yielded interesting and promising results that give a new insight into the natural history of metastatic bone disease. However, only a few studies have investigated the application of these newer techniques and further clinical trials are needed to corroborate their promising results and establish the most suitable imaging parameters and evaluation time points. Last, but not least, there is an absolute need to adopt uniform response criteria for bone metastases through an international consensus in order to better assess treatment response in terms of accuracy and objectivity.

Radiotherapy for metastatic bone disease: current standards and future prospectus

Changes in population dynamics will require increased end-of-life cancer care in the coming years. Palliative radiotherapy successfully relieves symptoms of advanced cancer, with the most common indication for its use being uncomplicated painful bone metastases. Single-fraction radiotherapy provides successful, time-efficient and cost-effective management of bone metastases. Newer technologies, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy, hold promise for some patients with spine metastases, although their niche has not been properly defined and their use outside of a protocol setting is inappropriate. Surgery should be considered for circumstances of completed or impending pathologic fracture, spinal instability, or spinal cord compression in patients who have adequate performance status and prognosis. Multiple sites of painful metastases may be treated with injectible radiopharmaceuticals or hemibody radiation. The future developments in palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases will mirror several forces affecting all of medicine, including resource allocation, the adoption of clinical guidelines and the integration of newer technologies.

Osteonecrosis of the jaws: clinicopathologic and radiologic characteristics, preventive and therapeutic strategies

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonate (BP) use has increased dramatically in recent years, becoming an integral part of the overall antineoplastic management of patients with metastatic bone disease. Even though their application has shown to be effective in reducing pain and minimizing the risk of skeletal-related events, their administration may bring also adverse events such osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ).

METHODS

After a thorough review of the literature, important aspects of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of ONJ are presented.

RESULTS

ONJ is evident in up to 10% of patients receiving intravenous BP treatment. Despite the fact that its exact pathophysiology is unknown, it is characterized by bone necrosis that can occur either spontaneously or after dental surgery or tooth extraction. Panoramic radiographs are useful for the diagnosis and routine assessment of patients and computed tomography can differentiate between ONJ and metastatic disease. Additionally, magnetic resonance imaging depicts local disease extension readily, and scintigraphy is the most sensitive imaging modality for detecting early involvement. Preventive measures and routine dental evaluations are essential components of the overall patient management. In the event of ONJ, stage I or II should be managed conservatively, whereas more advanced stages (III and IV) should be treated surgically.

CONCLUSION

ONJ is a well-defined clinical entity that all medical and dental doctors should be aware of, since if it is not dealt with readily and effectively, it may deteriorate the clinical status and quality of life of affected patients.

Randomised study of single dose (8 Gy vs. 6 Gy) of analgesic radiotherapy plus zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of a single dose of radio therapy (8 Gy vs. 6 Gy) plus zoledronic acid in cancer patients with bone metastases in treating pain; quality of life, time to onset of skeletal events and functional status.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 139 patients from 22 Spanish hospitals were randomly assigned to: Group A, administered a single dose of 8 Gy+zoledronic acid (4 mg iv, in 15-min infusions), and Group B, administered a single dose of 6 Gy+zoledronic acid (4 mg iv, in 15-min infusions). The main variable was pain, which was assessed with the Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) in supine, seated and standing positions.

RESULTS

There was a total of 118 patients for intention to treat (n=67 in Group A and n=51 in Group B). The most frequent primary neoplasms were the lung (29.66%), prostate (22.03%) and breast (21.19%). Sixty patients were analysed per protocol, n=34 in group A and n=26 in group B. Improvements were observed in the VAS scores for pain in all three positions. The mean time to onset of the event was greater (p=0.0211) in Group A than in Group B (122 vs. 81.62 days). Functional status improved in Group A, and quality of life improved in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The two groups achieved similar levels of pain control in supine, seated and standing positions. Quality of life also improved in both groups. However, the higher dose (8 Gy dose) in combination with zoledronic acid is associated with a longer period without skeletal events.

Impact of skeletal complications on patients' quality of life, mobility, and functional independence

INTRODUCTION

Skeletal-related events (SREs) from malignant bone disease cause considerable morbidity and can dramatically reduce patients' quality of life.

DISCUSSION

Pathologic fractures often require surgical intervention and palliative radiotherapy. Thus, patients suffer impaired mobility, loss of functional independence, and diminished health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Bisphosphonates can delay the onset and reduce the incidence of SREs and have become the standard of care for the treatment of malignant bone disease; however, minimal information on the effects of bisphosphonate treatment on HRQOL is available. Targeted HRQOL assessments for patients with malignant bone disease are currently under development and are discussed herein.

Guidance on the use of bisphosphonates in solid tumours: recommendations of an international expert panel

Bisphosphonates (BP) prevent, reduce, and delay cancer-related skeletal complications in patients, and have substantially decreased the prevalence of such events since their introduction. Today, a broad range of BP with differences in potency, efficacy, dosing, and administration as well as approved indications is available. In addition, results of clinical trials investigating the efficacy of BP in cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) have been recently published. The purpose of this paper is to review the current evidence on the use of BP in solid tumours and provide clinical recommendations. An interdisciplinary expert panel of clinical oncologists and of specialists in metabolic bone diseases assessed the widespread evidence and information on the efficacy of BP in the metastatic and nonmetastatic setting, as well as ongoing research on the adjuvant use of BP. Based on available evidence, the panel recommends amino-bisphosphonates for patients with metastatic bone disease from breast cancer and zoledronic acid for patients with other solid tumours as primary disease. Dosing of BP should follow approved indications with adjustments if necessary. While i.v. administration is most often preferable, oral administration (clodronate, IBA) may be considered for breast cancer patients who cannot or do not need to attend regular hospital care. Early-stage cancer patients at risk of developing CTIBL should be considered for preventative BP treatment. The strongest evidence in this setting is now available for ZOL. Overall, BP are well-tolerated, and most common adverse events are influenza-like syndrome, arthralgia, and when used orally, gastrointestinal symptoms. The dose of BP may need to be adapted to renal function and initial creatinine clearance calculation is mandatory according to the panel for use of any BP. Subsequent monitoring is recommended for ZOL and PAM, as described by the regulatory authority guidelines. Patients scheduled to receive BP (mainly every 3-4 weeks i.v.) should have a dental examination and be advised on appropriate measures for reducing the risk of jaw osteonecrosis. BP are well established as supportive therapy to reduce the frequency and severity of skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases from different cancers.

A prospective analysis of CT density measurements of bone metastases after treatment with zoledronic acid

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to prospectively determine CT density changes in bone metastases, before and after intravenous zoledronic acid for a maximum period of 12 months.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three consecutive patients presented with bone metastases and underwent therapy with zoledronic acid from December 2004. All patients underwent CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Bone density, measured in Hounsfield units (HU), was determined by segmenting lesions in the same anatomical area of the metastasis sites on the axial images of the sequential series of CT examinations. The effects of zoledronic acid were evaluated by calculating absolute and relative increases in bone density.

RESULTS

The patients presented with multiple metastases in 65% of the cases. When compared with the baseline, all groups demonstrated a significant increase in bone density, which significantly (p < 0.01) correlated with the number of zoledronic acid administrations. There was increased bone density of at least 100% in 57%, and an increase of at least 50% in 87% of the patients. This increase was significant in both lytic and sclerotic metastases after 3 months of therapy. No significant bone density difference was found in normal-appearing bone.

CONCLUSION

Bone density measured by CT increases at metastatic sites after zoledronic acid treatment, regardless of the type of metastasis, in contrast to apparently normal bone.

Management of painful bone metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines recent data on the pathophysiology and mechanisms of bone pain; it highlights the use of multiple and interdisciplinary treatments rather than sole use of traditional analgesics.

RECENT FINDINGS

Bone pain has been shown to have a unique pathophysiology. Recent experimental (animal) models have revealed that, parallel to increased bone destruction, ipsilateral spinal cord segments that receive primary input from the cancerous femur exhibit several notable neurochemical changes. These mandate the use of opioid doses sufficient to inhibit the observed nociceptive behaviours; these doses are greater than those required to alleviate pain behaviours of comparable magnitude generated by inflammatory pain. Several substances have been tested in this animal model.

SUMMARY

According to new preclinical data, treatment of bone cancer pain requires multidisciplinary therapies such as radiotherapy applied to the painful area along with systemic treatment (hormone therapy or chemotherapy) and supportive care (analgesic therapy and bisphosphonates). In some selected cases use of radioisotopes and other noninvasive or minimally invasive techniques may be useful in the management of metastatic bone pain. The treatment should be individualized according to the patient's clinical condition, life expectancy, and quality of life.

A novel study investigating the therapeutic outcome of patients with lytic, mixed and sclerotic bone metastases treated with combined radiotherapy and ibandronate

PURPOSE

To investigate the therapeutic response of patients with different types of bone metastases treated with combined radiotherapy and bisphosphonates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

By using computed tomography 52 patients were grouped into groups of lytic, mixed and sclerotic bone lesions. All patients were treated with concomitant radiotherapy and ibandronate (10 monthly cycles) and underwent clinical and radiological evaluations prior to therapy and at 3, 6 and 10 months of follow up.

RESULTS

At baseline there were statistically significant differences between the three groups for all the evaluated parameters. From 3 months onwards differences were leveled out. Statistically significant improvements were noted at all time points of evaluation for all groups in parameters such as pain (0-10), quality of life (QOL-physical functioning, 0-100) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS). The average pain score for the lytic group was reduced from 8.1 to 1.5 points at 3 months. The corresponding reductions for the mixed and sclerotic groups were from 6.2 to 0.5 and from 4.4 to 0.3 points respectively. Complete pain responses were >76.4% at all time points for all groups. Opioid consumption was also markedly reduced. Overall, the highest clinical response was noted for the lytic group, even though the mean values of pain, QOL and KPS were worse than those of the two other groups at all time points (apart from pain score at 10 months). The percentage of patients of the lytic group experiencing a complete pain response was the least of the three groups during follow up. At 10 months bone density was almost tripled for the lytic and almost doubled for the mixed group.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though the therapeutic outcome for the three groups was similar, the degree of clinical response and reossification differed.

Clinical and radiological evaluation of patients with lytic, mixed and sclerotic bone metastases from solid tumors: is there a correlation between clinical status of patients and type of bone metastases?

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between the clinical status of patients with metastatic bone disease and the type of bone metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

80 patients with skeletal metastases underwent both clinical and radiological assessments. Bone lesions were evaluated with computed tomography (CT), and patients were separated into three groups: lytic, mixed, sclerotic. Bone density of each lesion was measured in Hounsfield units (HU).

RESULTS

Patients with osteolytic lesions had the highest mean pain score with 8.1 +/- 2.2 points, the least mean scores for quality of life (QoL) and performance status (PS) with 31.4 +/- 14.6 and 58.6 +/- 9.7 points respectively, the highest percentage and mean opioid consumption (100% and 220.9 mg of oral daily morphine equivalent respectively), and the least mean bone density (116.3 +/- 40.4 HU). On the contrary, the group with sclerotic metastases had the least mean pain score with 4.6 +/- 1.3 points, the highest mean scores of QoL and PS (61.1 +/- 15.5 and 66.6 +/- 10 points respectively), the least percentage and mean opioid requirement (55.5% and 170.6 mg respectively), and the highest mean bone density (444 +/- 86.6 HU). The differences between the three groups were statistically significant for all parameters evaluated, apart from performance status between the sclerotic and mixed groups. The correlation coefficients were statistically significant between all parameters investigated. Bone density had a strong negative correlation with pain.

CONCLUSION

Our results show a clear correlation between the type of bone metastases and the clinical status of patients. Patients with excessive bone resorption suffer the most, and may be given priority in treatment. CT proved to be a practical and efficient method to investigate and classify metastatic bone lesions.