Comparison of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and capecitabine in preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

A management of patients achieving clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy and perspectives: on locally advanced rectal cancer

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) and selective use of adjuvant chemotherapy is currently considered the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Despite this, the concept of organ preservation is gradually challenging this approach. The management of complete clinical remission (cCR) lacks international consensus, leading scholars to develop their own perspectives based on well-designed studies and long-term data from large multicenter cohorts. To ensure appropriate treatment, this review focuses on the choice of neoadjuvant therapy, criteria for defining cCR, and treatment strategies for patients who achieve cCR after neoadjuvant therapy. By providing guidance on the accurate management of LARC patients after cCR, this review aims to prevent over- or under-treatment.

Chemoradiation for muscle-invasive bladder cancer using 5-fluorouracil versus capecitabine: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Oral capecitabine and intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are both used as a radiosensitizer in chemoradiotherapy (CRT). A capecitabine-based regimen is more convenient for both patients and healthcare professionals. Since large comparative studies are lacking, we compared toxicity, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between both CRT-regimens in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients diagnosed with non-metastatic MIBC between November 2017-November 2019 were consecutively included in the BlaZIB study. Data on patient, tumor, treatment characteristics and toxicity were prospectively collected from the medical files. From this cohort, all patients with cT2-4aN0-2/xM0/x, treated with capecitabine or 5-FU-based CRT were included in the current study. Toxicity in both groups was compared using Fisher-exact tests. Propensity score-based inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to correct for baseline differences between groups. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier OS and DFS curves were compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Of the 222 included patients, 111 (50%) were treated with 5-FU and 111 (50%) with capecitabine. Curative CRT was completed according to treatment plan in 77% of patients in the capecitabine-based group and 62% of the 5-FU group (p = 0.06). Adverse events (14 vs 21%, p = 0.29), 2-year OS (73% vs 61%, p = 0.07) and 2-year DFS (56% vs 50%, p = 0.50) did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and MMC is associated with a similar toxicity profile compared to 5-FU plus MMC and no difference in survival was found. Capecitabine-based CRT, as a more patient-friendly schedule, may be considered as an alternative to a 5-FU-based regimen.

Beneficial effects of modulated electro-hyperthermia during neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) may enhance the tumor response, although the effectiveness of combined neoadjuvant therapy remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the role of mEHT with neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data were analyzed for 120 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (T3/4 or N+, M0) from May 2012 to December 2017. Capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil was administered along with radiotherapy. Patients were categorized into mEHT group (62 patients) and non-mEHT group (58 patients) depending on whether mEHT was added. Surgery was performed 6-8 weeks after the end of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The median age was 59 years (range, 33-83). The median radiation dose was significantly less for mEHT group (40 Gy) than for non-mEHT group (50.4 Gy). In mEHT group, 80.7% showed down-staging compared with 67.2% in non-mEHT group. For large tumors of more than 65 cm³ (mean), improved tumor regression was observed in 31.6% of mEHT group compared with 0% of non-mEHT group (p = .024). The gastrointestinal toxicity rate of mEHT group was 64.5%, which was found to be statistically significantly less than 87.9% of non-mEHT group (p = .010). The 2-year disease-free survival was 96% for mEHT group and 79% for non-mEHT group (p = .054).

CONCLUSION

The overall mEHT group had a comparable response and survival using less radiation dosing compared with standard care; the subgroup with large tumors showed improved efficacy for tumor regression after mEHT.

Retrospective study of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for locally advanced rectal cancer

This study aimed to evaluate whether the addition of oxaliplatin to a neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimen could improve survival benefit in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. We retrospectively analysed 73 LARC patients (cT2-4 and/or cN1-2) who received preoperative CRT with capecitabine followed by surgery (arm A, 43 patients) or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin followed by surgery (arm B, 30 patients). The main endpoints of the study were pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints included the sphincter preservation rate and safety. The pCR for arms A and B were 28% and 17% (P = 0.267). In arms A and B, the mean OS was 84.287 months (95% CI 68.413-100.160) and 106.333 months (95% CI 99.281-113.386) (P = 0.185); the mean DFS was 72.812 months (95% CI 56.271-89.353) and 95.073 months (95% CI 83.392-106.754) (P = 0.310); and the sphincter preservation rates were 72% and 67%, respectively (P = 0.619). The incidence of grade 3 toxicity was much higher in arm B than in arm A (57% vs. 21%, P = 0.002). Adding oxaliplatin to a preoperative CRT regimen for LARC did not improve the survival benefits of patients or increase toxicity.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy in patients aged 75 years or older with locally advanced rectal cancer

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and treatment related morbidity of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy in elderly patients (aged 75 years or older) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Methods: We reviewed clinical records of elderly patients with LARC treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy between January 2008 and June 2017 at our institute. A dose of 45-50Gy in 25 fractions was delivered to pelvis. The primary tumor received a dose of 55Gy concomitantly for patients receiving intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The concurrent chemotherapy included capecitabine alone and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (Xelox). Surgery was performed for suitable patients at least 6 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment. Overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS), disease free survival (DFS) and local control (LC) were calculated with Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: A total of 85 patients were enrolled in this study, the median age was 80 years old (range: 75-90 years). After neoadjuvant treatment, surgery was performed in 56 patients (65.9%). Downstaging rate was 85.7% (48/56) with T downstaging in 35 patients (62.5%) and N downstaging in 36 patients (64.3%). Twelve patients (21.4%) obtained pathological complete response (pCR). The incidence of grade 3 or greater acute hematological, gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were 10.7%, 5.2% and 1.8%, respectively. Seven patients (12.5%) experienced postoperative complications. The median follow-up duration was 35.7 months (range: 4.3-100.3 months), The 3-year and 5-year OS, DSS, DFS, LC were 68.9% and 47.2%, 75.8% and 60.4%, 68.2% and 56.1%, 83.9% and 78.3%, respectively.

Conclusion: In patients aged 75 years or older with LARC, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery was well tolerated with promising survival outcomes, which should be strongly suggested if medically suitable.

Early Systemic Failure After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for the Treatment of Patients With Rectal Cancer

Purpose

Distant metastasis can occur early after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with rectal cancer. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients who developed early systemic failure.

Methods

The patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRT for a rectal adenocarcinoma between June 2007 and July 2015 were included in this study. Patients who developed distant metastasis within 6 months after CRT were identified. We compared short- and long-term clinicopathologic outcomes of patients in the early failure (EF) group with those of patients in the control group.

Results

Of 107 patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRT for rectal cancer, 7 developed early systemic failure. The lung was the most common metastatic site. In the EF group, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen was higher (5 mg/mL vs. 2 mg/mL, P = 0.010), and capecitabine as a sensitizer of CRT was used more frequently (28.6% vs. 3%, P = 0.002). Of the 7 patients in the EF group, only 4 underwent a primary tumor resection (57.1%), in contrast to the 100% resection rate in the control group (P < 0.001). In terms of pathologic outcomes, ypN and TNM stages were more advanced in the EF group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.047, respectively), and numbers of positive and retrieved lymph nodes were much higher (P < 0.001 and P = 0.027, respectively).

Conclusion

Although early distant metastasis after CRT for rectal cancer is very rare, patients who developed early metastasis showed a poor nodal response with a low primary tumor resection rate and poor oncologic outcomes.

Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The differences in efficacy between capecitabine and 5-fuorouracil (5-FU) in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) are not well recognized. We performed this meta-analysis to analyze the effect of capecitabine and 5-FU on neoadjuvant CRT to more accurately understand the differences between the 2 drugs.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Database were performed to identify all published studies investigating the efficacy of capecitabine in neoadjuvant CRT of LARC versus 5-FU before August, 2017. Primary endpoint was the odds ratio (OR) for improving pathological complete response (pCR) rate of patients with LARC. Secondary endpoints were the ORs of efficiency for downstaging tumor and increasing R0 resection in patients with LARC. Safety analyses were also performed. The OR was the principal measurement of effect, which was calculated as capecitabine group versus 5-FU group, and was presented as a point estimate with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All calculations and statistical tests were performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

In all, 2916 patients with LARC enrolled in the 10 studies were divided into capecitabine group (n = 1451) and 5-FU group (n = 1465). The meta-analysis showed that capecitabine improved pCR (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.10-1.63), and R0 resection rate (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.10-3.36). There were no statistically significant differences either in overall downstaging rate (OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.79-2.16) or in the tumor downstaging rate (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.79-1.92), but there was a significant difference of the nodal downstaging rate between the 2 groups (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.11-2.54). There was no statistically significant difference in sphincter preservation rate between the 2 groups (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.96-1.92). No obvious safety concerns about mortality and complications were raised in these studies. There were no statistically significant differences in 3-year disease-free-survival (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.75-2.20), and in grade 3 to 4 acute toxicity during CRT (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.31-1.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with 5-FU-based neoadjuvant CRT, capecitabine-based neoadjuvant CRT can safely improve pCR, nodal down-staging, ad R0 resection of patients with LARC.

Patterns of failure in rectal cancer with positive circumferential resection margin after surgery following preoperative chemoradiation: a propensity score matching analysis

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the patterns of failure between rectal cancer patients with negative and positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) after surgery following preoperative chemoradiation.

METHODS:

Of 944 stage II-III rectal cancer patients treated with radical surgery following preoperative chemoradiation, 74 patients (7.8%) showed positive CRM. Each 72 patients from negative and positive CRM groups were identified by propensity score matching and compared in terms of survival outcomes and patterns of failure. Local failure was defined as recurrence at the anastomosis site or adjacent to the mesorectal fascia.

RESULTS:

The median follow-up was 46 months (range, 4-155). No difference was observed in 5-year local recurrence-free survival (93.4% vs 89.6%, p = 0.442) in the negative and positive CRM groups. There was statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival (57.1% vs 39.1%, p = 0.042). Negative CRM group showed favorable outcomes than positive CRM in distant metastasis-free survival (59.4% vs 43.3%, p = 0.069) and overall survival (67.5% vs 55.8%, p = 0.186), but the difference was not statistically significant. As the initial failure pattern, there were 30 and 43 recurrences in the negative and positive CRM groups (local 6.6 and 7.3%, regional 12.8 and 14.4%, and distant 38.5 and 54.9%). Isolated local recurrence was identified in two with negative CRM and in none with positive CRM (p = 0.497).

CONCLUSION:

Distant metastasis was the major pattern of failure regardless of CRM involvement in rectal cancer patients treated with surgery following preoperative chemoradiation. It would be taken account of our finding on adjuvant treatment for the patient with positive CRM.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:

Investigation of the patterns of failure in patients with CRM involvement after preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery can be conducive to selecting the appropriate approach to additional treatment for them.

A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Consolidation Chemotherapy After Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy Versus Chemoradiation Therapy Alone for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: KCSG CO 14-03

PURPOSE

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) in locally advanced rectal cancer is the standard of care. To date, the role of consolidation chemotherapy after CRT has rarely been addressed through randomized trials. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy compared with CRT alone.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study enrolled patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum and cT3 or cT4 disease with any N category and no metastasis. In arm A (control arm), we planned CRT (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) with capecitabine followed by TME. In arm B, 2 cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin were administered 1 week after the completion of CRT before TME (capecitabine, 1700 mg/m² per day from day 1 to 14, and oxaliplatin, 100 mg/m² on day 1, every 3 weeks). The downstaging rate (the proportion of ypT0 to ypT2 and ypN0M0) was the primary endpoint, which was to be tested with a 1-sided type I error of 15% and with 85% power.

RESULTS

From September 2014 to February 2016, 110 patients (56 in arm A and 54 in arm B) were randomized and 108 (55 in arm A and 53 in arm B) started CRT. TME was conducted per protocol in 96 patients (52 in arm A and 44 in arm B). In arms A and B, downstaging was achieved in 21.2% and 36.4% (P = .077), respectively, and the pathologic complete response rate was 5.8% and 13.6% (P = .167), respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 3.6% of patients in arm A and 9.4% of patients in arm B during the preoperative treatment phase and in 1.9% and 9.0%, respectively, during the postoperative recovery phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Consolidation chemotherapy with 2 cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin demonstrated a marginal improvement in the downstaging rate. However, a phase 3 trial of this strategy is discouraged because of the high dropout rate and safety issues.

Importance of the Circumferential Extent of Tumors and Clinical Lymph Node Status as Prognostic Factors after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cancer

Aims and background

To evaluate the clinical factors that influence pathological and clinical outcomes after preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

Methods

Between 1999 and 2004, 121 patients with cT3-4 or node-positive rectal cancer received preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Preoperative radiation therapy with 45 Gy was delivered. Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy was administered to most of the patients.

Results

Pathological complete remission was 14.3% after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. More than 60% tumor circumferential extent was an independent adverse factor for complete remission (P = 0.011, HR 4.643, 95% CI 1.415–15.231). Local recurrence developed in 9.9% of the cases. Serum CEA level ≥5 ng/ml (P = 0.057, HR 3.022, 95% CI 0.967–9.441) and >60% circumferential extent of tumor (P = 0.064, HR 4.232, 95% CI 0.918–19.531) were marginal adverse factors for local recurrence. Five-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 72.2% and 86.6%, respectively. Disease-free survival was poor for patients with the lymph nodes ≥1 cm in diameter (P = 0.028), cN2 stage disease (P = 0.047) and >60% circumferential extent of tumor (P = 0.058). Multivariate analysis for disease-free survival showed that the lymph node size ≥1 cm was an adverse factor (P = 0.019, HR 2.380, 95% CI 1.115–4.906). Patients with >60% circumferential extent of tumor and cN2 stage had a more unfavorable survival than the other patients (disease-free survival, P = 0.018; overall survival, P = 0.015). Patients with >60% circumferential extent of tumor and/or lymph node ≥1 cm also had an unfavorable survival (disease-free survival, P = 0.016; overall survival, P = 0.049).

Conclusions

In rectal cancer, circumferential extent of tumor and clinical lymph node status were important factors for preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery. A further prospective study is needed to confirm and expand these findings.

Effects of Preoperative Radiochemotherapy with Capecitabine for Resectable Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients

Aims and background

Rectal cancer is a common disease of elderly people. However, patients over 70 years of age are often not included in clinical trials. There is a lack of data concerning the use of radiochemotherapy with capecitabine in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the impact of preoperative radiochemotherapy with capecitabine on downstaging and sphincter preservation and to assess treatment compliance and toxicity in elderly patients.

Methods

Twenty-six patients with resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (stage II-III/TNM) aged >70 years received preoperative radiotherapy and concurrent oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily during the whole period of radiotherapy. Two patients who refused surgery after chemoradiation therapy were excluded from the analysis.

Results

Eighty-one percent of patients underwent anterior resection and 18.1% underwent abdominoperineal resection. Overall tumor downstaging, considering both T and N categories, was observed in 18/24 patients (75%). Treatment compliance was good and toxicity rates were similar to those of younger people.

Conclusions

Age is not a contraindication to any therapy and elderly patients who can tolerate radiochemotherapy should be treated like younger patients. Preoperative radiochemotherapy with capecitabine for patients aged >70 years has a good impact on tumor downstaging, increases the feasibility of sphincter-preserving surgery, and is also safe and well tolerated.

Enhanced antitumor efficacy and reduced toxicity of Abnormal Savda Munziq on tumor bearing mice treated with chemotherapy

Previous research has demonstrated the anti-tumor properties of Abnormal Savda Munziq (ASMq), a traditional Uyghur compound herbal medicine. The effects of ASMq on cervical carcinomas in U27 tumor-bearing mice is investigated, the effect of adding Fluorouracil (5-FU) is also assessed in this paper. The results demonstrate that ASMq and 5-FU significantly inhibited the proliferation of U27 cells in a time-dependent and dose-dependent manner. Evaluating the interactions between ASMq and 5-FU on U27 cell growth yields a combination index (CI) < 1 in different time periods, suggesting a synergistic effect between the two drugs in vitro. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis demonstrates that ASMq can inhibit enhanced lipid metabolism in tumor mice, enhance the glutamine content, promote lymphocyte and macrophage proliferation, and increase tumor necrosis factor(TNF-α) and interleukin(IL) production, which can enhance the effect of 5-FU on the inhibition of tumors. Also ASMq can reduce the content of ALT and AST in serum. Increased SOD, GSH-Px, and decreased the content of MDA in liver tissue. ASMq has a synergistic effect on liver and tumor pathology, as well as tumor inhibition rate. In addition, ASMq can also enhance the body's antioxidant capacity and improve the body's metabolism, and reduce 5-FU's toxic side effects.

Comparison of 5-FU-based and Capecitabine-based Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The inconvenience of using infusion therapies resulted in the development of capecitabine (CA), an oral fluoropyrimidine. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated 10 studies that compared the efficacy and safety of an oral CA-based regimen with those of a continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regimen for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The databases searched included Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar (until August 31, 2016). The primary outcome assessed was the rate of postoperative down-staging of the tumor and pathologic complete response. The secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

This meta-analysis (5 retrospective studies, 3 prospective studies, and 2 randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) compared the efficacy of the 5-FU arm (n = 757) to that of the CA arm (n = 719). There was no significant difference in tumor down-staging rate between the 2 regimens (RCTs/prospective studies: odds ratio [OR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.20; P = .416; retrospective studies: OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.50-1.44; P = .534). There was also no significant difference in pathologic complete response (RCTs/prospective studies: OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.52-1.23; P = .304; retrospective studies: OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.48-1.12; P = .149), or survival rates (3-year, 5-year DFS, and 5-year OS rate) between the 2 groups. The CA group had a higher number of patients reporting diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome compared with the 5-FU group. The 5-FU group had a higher number of patients reporting mucositis compared with the CA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggested that oral CA was equivalent to continuous infusion 5-FU in the curative setting of rectal cancer during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy with Capecitabine versus Fluorouracil for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis was carried out to compare the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus radiation with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus radiotherapy (RT) as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We searched the Cochrane database, Ovid, Medline, Embase, ISI databases, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database between January 1998 and October 2014. Trials of capecitabine compared with 5-FU plus RT as neoadjuvant treatment for LARC were considered for inclusion. RevMan software was used to analyze these data. Nine trials were included in this meta-analysis, which covered a total of 3141 patients. The meta-analysis showed that capecitabine group had statistically significant better pCR rates (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.10-1.64; P = 0.003), T downstaging rates (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.22-2.06; P = 0.0007), N downstaging rates (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.34-3.16; P = 0.001), less distant metastasis (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88; P = 0.007), and lowered leucocytes (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.54; P = 0.0005), but with higher incidence of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (OR, 4.43; 95% CI, 1.59-12.33; P = 0.004). Capecitabine was more efficient than 5-FU in terms of tumor response in neoadjuvant treatment for patients with LARC and favourably low toxicity with the exception of HFS.

Adjuvant radiotherapy for the treatment of stage IV rectal cancer after curative resection: A propensity score-matched analysis and meta-analysis

The role of pelvic radiotherapy (RT) in stage IV rectal cancer with total mesorectal excision (TME) has not been defined. We evaluated the impact of RT on oncologic outcomes among patients with stage IV rectal cancer who underwent TME and performed a meta-analysis of published studies.The records of stage IV rectal cancer patients who underwent TME between August 2001 and December 2011 were reviewed. Patients who received pelvic RT (RT group) and those who did not (non-RT group) were matched using a propensity score. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the groups. A systematic literature search and meta-analysis was conducted.One hundred seventy-six patients were matched with propensity score matching, resulting in 39 patients in each group. The local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) of the RT group was significantly higher than that of the non-RT group (2-year LRFS: 100% vs 83.6%, respectively, P = 0.038). The overall survival, disease-free survival, and systemic recurrence were not significantly different between the groups. In the meta-analysis, the RT group had a reduced risk for loco-regional recurrence than the non-RT group (RR: 0.48, 95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.79).Pelvic RT might have benefits for loco-regional control in patients with stage IV rectal cancer who undergo TME.

Severe myositis of the hip flexors after pre-operative chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: case report

BACKGROUND

The use of neoadjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma has been shown to reduce disease recurrence when combined with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. We report a case of a patient who developed a debilitating bilateral myopathy of the hip flexors after successful treatment for rectal cancer. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such complication from radiation therapy reported in a patient with colorectal cancer. The disproportionate severity of our patient's myopathy relative to the dose of radiation used also makes this case unique among reports of neuromuscular complications from radiation therapy.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient is a 65-year-old male with node negative, high-grade adenocarcinoma of the rectum penetrating through the distal rectal wall. He underwent neoadjuvant concurrent pelvic radiation therapy and capecitabine-based chemotherapy, followed by abdominoperineal resection and post-operative FOLFOX chemotherapy. Five months post-completion of pelvic radiotherapy and 2 months after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, he presented with bilateral weakness of the iliopsoas muscles and severe pain radiating to the groin. The patient improved with 40 mg/d of prednisone, which was gradually tapered to 2 mg/d over 6 months, with substantial recovery of muscle strength and elimination of pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The timing, presentation and response of our patient's symptoms to corticosteroids are most consistent with a radiation recall reaction. Radiation recall is a phenomenon whereby previously irradiated tissue becomes vulnerable to toxicity by subsequent systemic therapy and is rarely associated with myopathies. Radiation recall should be considered a potential complication of neoadjuvant radiation therapy for rectal cancer, and for ongoing research into the optimization of treatment for these patients. Severe myopathies caused by radiation recall may be fully reversible with corticosteroid treatment.

Sequential boost in neoadjuvant irradiation for T3N0-1 rectal cancer: long-term results from a single-center experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of radiation dose on tumor regression grade (TRG) and sphincter preservation rate in a series of cT3N0-1 rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) with or without a sequential radiation boost.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 2002 and September 2013, 116 cases were eligible for retrospective evaluation. Radiotherapy was delivered for a total dose of 45 Gy (no boost arm) or 50.4 Gy (boost arm). TRG was evaluated with the Dworak scale.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 62 months (range, 12-138 months). The 5-year overall survival and local control rates were 72% and 93%, respectively. Fifty-five patients (47%) were treated with a sequential radiation boost and 61 (53%) without a boost. Eighty patients (72%) presented T3N0 disease and 32 (28%) T3N1 disease. Concomitant capecitabine was administered in 92 cases (79%) and intravenous 5-fluorouracil in 24 cases (21%). Sphincter preservation was performed in 82% of patients in the boost arm and 66% in the no-boost arm. A higher TRG was related to a longer interval between neoadjuvant treatment and surgery (p&lt;0.001). The probability of a TRG ≥2 was 2.5 times higher in the boost arm. A gain in local control, estimated at 4% during the first 3 years after CT-RT, favored the boost arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term results from our single-center experience confirm literature data on the role of a sequential boost in tumor response after neoadjuvant CT-RT in a series of cT3N0-1 rectal cancer patients.

Phase II study of computed tomography-guided (125)I-seed implantation plus chemotherapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of CT guided (125)I-seed implantation (CTII) plus chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with LRRC who received one prior chemotherapy regimen were enrolled and divided randomly assigned to FOLFORI alone (Arm A) and FOLFORI plus CTII (Arm B). The primary endpoint was local control time (LCT). Overall survival (OS) and treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were also observed.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were enrolled from October 2008 and December 2014. Twenty-seven were assigned into Arm A and 30 into Arm B. The overall response rate of locally recurrent tumor was improved to 100% in Arm B versus 29.6% in Arm A (P<0.001). A significant longer LCT was observed in Arm A (P<0.001); median LCT was 12 months in Arm B versus 4 months in Arm A. A borderline significant improvement in OS was also observed in Arm B (P=0.0464); median OS was 25 months in Arm B versus 19 months in Arm A. For patients without distant metastases, median OS was 37 months in Arm B versus 21 months in Arm A (P=0.0101). For patients with (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy (ART), a longer LCT and OS were also found in Arm B (P<0.001 and P=0.0217, respectively). TRAEs were not serious generally. There was no statistically significant difference in treatment related toxicity between Arm A and B both for all patients and patients receiving ART.

CONCLUSIONS

CTII plus FOLFIRI improves the LCT with tolerable toxicities as a second-line treatment in patients with local recurrent rectal cancer, and is helpful to prolong the OS, particularly in patients without distant metastases or with a history of radiotherapy.

Postoperative Capecitabine with Concurrent Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy or Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Patients with Stage II and III Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival outcomes and toxicity of postoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in patients with stage II and III rectal cancer.

PATIENTS

We recruited 184 patients with pathologically proven, stage II or III rectal cancer. Following total mesorectal excision (TME), the patients were treated with capecitabine and concurrent IMRT/3D-CRT. The treatment regimen consisted of two cycles of oral capecitabine (1600 mg/m2/day), administered twice daily from day 1-14 of radiotherapy, followed by a 7-day rest. The median pelvic dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy was administered after the chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival, disease-free survival and locoregional control (LRC) rates were 85.1%, 80% and 95.4%, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were observed in 28.3% of patients during treatment. Grade 3 or 4 late toxicity, including neurotoxicity or gastrointestinal toxicity, was only observed in nine patients (4.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that capecitabine chemotherapy with concurrent IMRT/3D-CRT following TME is safe, is well tolerated and achieves superior LRC and favorable survival rates, with acceptable toxicity.

Prospective phase II trial of nimotuzumab in combination with radiotherapy and concurrent capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding concurrent nimotuzumab to preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with rectal cancer (clinical stage T3/4 or N+) were scheduled to receive weekly nimotuzumab (400 mg; days -6, 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29). Capecitabine (825 mg/m(2)) was delivered orally twice daily for the duration of radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was administered at 50.4 Gy (45 + 5.4 Gy). The main endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with T3 or T4 disease were enrolled; 66.7 % were nodal-positive; the median distance from the anal verge was 5.5 cm. A pCR was achieved in four patients (19.0 %); 71.4 % patients obtained moderate or good tumor regression (Grade 2 and 3). Downstaging occurred in 15/21 (71.4 %) patients by T stage and 11/14 (78.6 %) by N stage. The actual dose intensities (median/mean, %) were nimotuzumab (100, 100) and capecitabine (100, 99.5). The most frequent Grade 1/2 toxicities were radiation dermatitis (57.1 %), nausea/vomiting (52.4 %), leukocytopenia (47.6 %), diarrhea (47.6 %), and proctitis (38.1 %). Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in 9.5 % of patients and Grade 3 leukocytopenia in 4.8 %.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results indicate that nimotuzumab can be safely combined with radiotherapy plus concurrent capecitabine. The efficacy of this regimen (pCR = 19.0 %) was significantly higher than that observed in previous phase II trials of preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine and cetuximab in rectal cancer. Further investigation of concurrent nimotuzumab with radiotherapy plus capecitabine is warranted.

Acute small-bowel toxicity during neoadjuvant combined radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: determination of optimal dose-volume cut-off value predicting grade 2-3 diarrhoea

Background

Current therapeutic standard for locally advanced rectal cancer is the neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with total mesorectal excision. Diarrhoea is the main acute side effect, induced by the dose to the small-bowel, frequently leading to a treatment modification. Aim of this study was to analyse the differences between the irradiated small-bowel volumes and the occurrence of acute diarrhea during combined radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer.

Methods

45 patients treated with a neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (three-field box 50.4 Gy; Cetuximab, Capecitabine, Irinotecan) for locally advanced rectal cancer within a prospective phase I/II study were evaluated. Based on the dose-volume histograms, the small-bowel volumes receiving doses of 5, 10 … 45 Gy (V5, V10 …V45) were calculated and compared with the prospectively documented small- bowel toxicities.

Results

There was a statistically significant difference between irradiated small-bowel volumes and the severity of therapy related diarrhoea. The strongest validity concerning the risk of developing a grade 2–3 diarrhoea was seen at a dose level of 5 Gy (V 5) with a small-bowel volume of 291.94 cc. Patients with V 5 > 291.94 cc had significantly more often grade 2–3 diarrhoea, than patients with V5 below this cut-off value (82% vs. 29%; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

In the inverse treatment planning of rectal caner patients the small-bowel volume receiving 5 Gy should be limited to about 300 cc.

The role of fibrinogen as a predictor in preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

To perform chemoradiotherapy (CRT) effectively, it is clinically beneficial to identify predictors of tumor response after CRT. This study examined the association between plasma fibrinogen level before preoperative CRT and tumor response in advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 947 patients who received preoperative CRT followed by curative surgery for primary rectal cancer. We analyzed clinical factors that could be associated with pathologic tumor response in terms of downstaging (ypStage 0-I), primary tumor regression (ypT0-1), and complete response (ypT0N0).

RESULTS

Downstaging was observed in 366 patients (38.6%), primary tumor regression in 187 patients (19.7%) and complete response in 138 patients (14.6%). Multivariate analysis found that pre-CRT carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, fibrinogen level, hemoglobin level, clinical T and N classification, distance from anal verge, and histologic grade were significant predictive factors for downstaging; CEA level, fibrinogen level, and N classification predicted primary tumor regression; CEA level, and fibrinogen level were predictive for complete response.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that fibrinogen level was a significant predictor of pathologic tumor response after preoperative CRT.

Phase II study of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 plus bevacizumab for locally advanced resectable rectal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

A single-arm phase II clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with concurrent S-1, bevacizumab, and radiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with LARC were enrolled. A total dose of 45 Gy was delivered in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, S-1 was administered orally twice a day on days 1-14 and 22-35, and bevacizumab was administered on days 1, 15, and 29. Surgical resection was scheduled 8 weeks (6-10 weeks) after completing the CRT.

RESULTS

All 52 patients underwent R0 radical surgery. Sphincter preservation was possible in 38 (73.1%) patients. A pathologic complete response was obtained in 10 (19.2%) patients, a pathologic downstaging was achieved in 37 (71.2%) patients, and the tumor shrinkage rate was 77.1%. The only grade 3 adverse events were leukopenia and rash in 1 (1.9%) patient. The rate of postoperative complications was 28.8%. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 9 (23.7%) of the 38 patients who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery. Perineal wound dehiscence developed in 2 (14.3%) of the 14 patients who received an abdominoperineal resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding bevacizumab to S-1 clearly increased the incidence of wound-related complications, with no distinct enhancement of tumor response.

S-1-Based versus capecitabine-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a matched-pair analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper was to compare the efficacy and safety of S-1-based and capecitabine-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer through a retrospective matched-pair analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between Jan 2010 and Mar 2014, 24 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received preoperative radiotherapy concurrently with S-1 were individually matched with 24 contemporary patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received preoperative radiotherapy concurrently with capecitabine according to clinical stage (as determined by pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography) and age (within five years). All these patients performed mesorectal excision 4-8 weeks after the completion of chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

The tumor volume reduction rates were 55.9±15.1% in the S-1 group and 53.8±16.0% in the capecitabine group (p = 0.619). The overall downstaging, including both T downstaging and N downstaging, occurred in 83.3% of the S-1 group and 70.8% of the capecitabine group (p = 0.508). The significant tumor regression, including regression grade I and II, occurred in 33.3% of S-1 patients and 25.0% of capecitabine patients (p = 0.754). In the two groups, Grade 4 adverse events were not observed and Grade 3 consisted of only two cases of diarrhea, and no patient suffered hematologic adverse event of Grade 2 or higher. However, the incidence of diarrhea (62.5% vs 33.3%, p = 0.014) and hand-foot syndrome (29.2% vs 0%, p = 0.016) were higher in capecitabine group. Other adverse events did not differ significantly between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens were effective and safe for patients of locally advanced rectal cancer, but regimen with S-1 exhibited a lower incidence of adverse events.

Expression of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase linked to chemoradiation susceptibility of human colon cancer cells

Background

Resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with colorectal cancer prevents effective treatment and leads to unnecessary and burdensome chemotherapy. Therefore, prediction of 5-FU resistance is imperative.

Methods

To identify the proteins linked to 5-FU resistance, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis-based proteomics was performed using the human colon cancer cell line SNU-C4R with induced 5-FU resistance. Proteins showing altered expression in SNU-C4R were identified by matrix-associated laser desorption/ionization–time-of-flight analysis, and their roles in susceptibility to 5-FU or radiation were evaluated in various cell lines by transfection of specific siRNA or creation of overexpression constructs. Changes in cellular signaling and expression of mitochondrial apoptotic factors were investigated by Western Blot analysis. A mitochondrial membrane potential probe (JC-1 dye) and a flow cytometry system were employed to determine the mitochondrial membrane potential. Finally, protein levels were determined by Western Blot analysis in tissues from 122 patients with rectal cancer to clarify whether each identified protein is a useful predictor of a chemoradiation response.

Results

We identified mitochondrial phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (mPEPCK) as a candidate predictor of 5-FU resistance. PEPCK was downregulated in SNU-C4R compared with its parent cell line SNU-C4. Overexpression of mPEPCK did not significantly alter the susceptibility to either 5-FU or radiation. Suppression of mPEPCK led to a decrease in both the cellular level of phosphoenolpyruvate and the susceptibility to 5-FU and radiation. Furthermore, the cellular levels of phosphoenolpyruvate (an end product of PEPCK and a substrate of pyruvate kinase), phosphorylated AKT, and phosphorylated 4EBP1 were decreased significantly secondary to the mPEPCK suppression in SNU-C4. However, mPEPCK siRNA transfection induced changes in neither the mitochondrial membrane potential nor the expression levels of mitochondrial apoptotic factors such as Bax, Bcl-2, and Bad. Downregulation of total PEPCK was observed in tissues from patients with rectal cancer who displayed poor responses to preoperative 5-FU-based radiation therapy.

Conclusion

Our overall results demonstrate that mPEPCK is a useful predictor of a response to chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

Prognostic impact of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The circumferential resection margin (CRM) is a strong prognostic factor in rectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between CRM distance and recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

We analyzed data for 561 patients who underwent preoperative CRT and curative surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer between August 2001 and December 2008. CRM was divided into four groups: group 1, CRM > 2 mm; group 2, 1.1-2.0 mm; group 3, 0.1-1.0 mm; and group 4, 0 mm. We assessed the associations of CRM with local recurrence and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 comprised 487, 36, 20, and 18 patients, respectively. The local recurrence rate was highest and the disease-free survival rate was lowest in group 4, followed by groups 3, 2, and 1. Survival was similar between groups 2 and 1. Local recurrence rates were lower in groups 3, 2, and 1 than in group 4 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.28, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.09-0.91, P = 0.035; HR 0.11, 95 % CI 0.03-0.46, P = 0.002; HR 0.18, 95 % CI 0.08-0.42, P < 0.0001, respectively]. Disease-free survival rates were higher in groups 3, 2, and 1 than in group 4 (HR 0.32, 95 % CI 0.13-0.75, P = 0.009; HR 0.24, 95 % CI 0.10-0.54, P = 0.001; HR 0.26, 95 % CI 0.14-0.48, P < 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

After preoperative CRT, CRM distance provides useful information for risk stratification in the recurrence of rectal cancer.

Preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a comparison of bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and capecitabine

PURPOSE

To compare the acute toxicities, pathologic response, surgical margins, downstaging, local control, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced rectal cancer patients with preoperative radiotherapy (RT) with either concurrent bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) or capecitabine (CA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients who presented to our department with a diagnosis of locally advanced rectal cancer were treated with surgery following preoperative RT with either concurrent 5-FU/LV or CA between January 2008 and December 2011 were analyzed.

RESULTS

Median follow-up period was 38 months (range 3-61). Four patients (6.7%) had grade 3 gastrointestinal (GIS) toxicity during the course of chemoradiotherapy. The pathologic complete response rates were 8% with 5-FU/LV and 8.6% with CA (P = 0.844). Also, 60% of the patients treated with 5-FU/LV and 37.1% with CA had downstaging of the T stage after chemoradiotherapy (P = 0.026). The 5-year local control (P = 0.510), distant control (P = 0.721), DFS (P = 0.08), and OS (P = 0.09) rates were 80%, 80%, 59.4%, and 64.4%, respectively, for patients treated with 5-FU/LV and 85.7%, 82.9%, 74.8%, and 75.1%, respectively, for patients treated with CA.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were seen in the local control and distant recurrences and the survival among patients treated with pre-op RT and concurrent 5-FU/LV compared with those treated with pre-op RT and concurrent CA, except toxicities.

Comparison of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: capecitabine alone versus capecitabine plus irinotecan

BACKGROUND

To compare the short-term tumor response and long-term clinical outcome of two preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

This study included 231 patients scheduled for preoperative CRT using two chemotherapeutic protocols from April 2003-August 2006. Pelvic radiotherapy (50.4 Gy) was delivered concurrently with capecitabine (n = 148) or capecitabine/irinotecan (n = 83). Surgery was performed 4-8 weeks after CRT completion. Tumor responses to CRT were assessed using both radiologic and pathologic measurements. Radiologic responses were evaluated by magnetic resonance volumetry, which was performed at the initial work-up and after completion of preoperative CRT just before surgery. Pathologic responses were assessed with downstaging (ypStage 0-1) and grading tumor regression. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in terms of local control, relapse-free survival, and overall survival rates.

RESULTS

Radiologic examination demonstrated that tumor volume decreased by 65.6% in the capecitabine group and 66.8% capecitabine/irinotecan group (p = 0.731). Postoperative pathologic stage determination showed that tumor downstaging occurred in 44.1% of the capecitabine group and 48.6% of the capecitabine/irinotecan group (p = 0.538). The sum of tumor regression grade 3 (near complete response) and 4 (complete response) after CRT were 28.6% in the capecitabine group and 37.5% in the capecitabine/irinotecan group (p = 0.247). There were no significant differences between the two groups in 5-year local control (91.7% vs. 92.5%; p = 0.875), relapse-free survival (80.8% vs. 77.2%; p = 0.685), and overall survival (88.4% vs. 90.4%; p = 0.723).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed no differences in the short-term tumor response and long-term clinical outcome between preoperative capecitabine and capecitabine/irinotecan CRT regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Predictive value of (18)FDG PET-CT for tumour response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated by preoperative chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Although (18)fluorine-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ((18)FDG PET-CT) is considered a reliable modality for determining tumour response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), the role of (18)FDG PET-CT for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether (18)FDG PET-CT can predict tumour response after CRT in patients with LARC, in terms of downstaging and pCR.

METHODS

Between March 2009 and February 2012, 151 patients with LARC treated with neoadjuvant CRT followed by radical surgery were reviewed retrospectively. Pre-CRT SUVmax (maximum standardized uptake value), post-CRT SUVmax, ΔSUVmax (difference between pre- and post-CRT SUVmax), and RI-SUV (response index) were measured before and after CRT. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyse the association of PET-CT-related parameters and clinical variables, to assess downstaging and pCR.

RESULTS

Downstaging occurred in 48 patients (31.7 %) and pCR in 19 patients (12.5 %). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed post-CRT SUVmax as a significant factor for prediction of downstaging, with sensitivity of 60.4 %, specificity of 65.0 %, and accuracy of 55.9 %, for a cutoff value of 3.70. Regarding pCR, post-CRT SUVmax was again found as a significant parameter by univariate and multivariate analysis, with sensitivity of 73.7 %, specificity of 63.7 %, and accuracy of 64.9 %, for a cutoff value of 3.55.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that post-CRT SUVmax independently predicts downstaging and pCR. However, the predictive values of post-CRT SUVmax for tumour response after neoadjuvant CRT are too low in sensitivity and specificity to change the treatment plan for LARC.

Comparison of capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil in chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Background

Although capecitabine has theoretical advantages in the pharmacokinetics, such as higher intratumoral and lower systemic concentration, relative to bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with capecitabine or bolus 5-FU have not been directly compared in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we retrospectively compared the outcomes, including toxicity, tumor response, and overall survival, of oral capecitabine plus radiotherapy (RT) with bolus 5-FU plus RT, in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Between August 2006 and January 2012, 98 patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer received CRT, with 52 receiving concurrent oral capecitabine and 46 receiving bolus injection of 5-FU. Primary tumor and overall response after CRT were evaluated radiologically, and toxicity, tumor response, and overall survival (OS) were compared in the two groups.

Results

Baseline clinical parameters of the two groups were similar. The rates of ≥ Grade 3 hematologic (0% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.045) and non-hematologic (0% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.045) toxicities were significantly lower in the capecitabine group than in the 5-FU group. Primary tumor (30.7% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.658) and overall (13.7% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.273) response rates and median OS time (12.5 months vs. 11.6 months, p = 0.655) were similar in the two groups.

Conclusions

Capecitabine plus RT may be a safe and feasible regimen for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, with similar efficacy and low rates of toxicities compared with bolus 5-FU plus RT.

The correlation between the levels of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 in plasma and tumour response and survival after preoperative radiochemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer

Background

The aim of this study was to analyse whether the level of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP) 1 is associated with the tumour response and survival to preoperative radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer patients.

Patients and methods.

Ninety-two patients with histologically confirmed non-metastatic rectal cancer of clinical stage I– III were treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy, surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. Plasma TIMP-1 concentrations were measured prior to the start of the treatment with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results

Median follow-up time was 68 months (range: 3–93 months) while in survivors it was 80 months (range: 68–93 months). The 5-year locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) rates for all patients were 80.2%, 56.4%, 63.7% and 52.2%, respectively. The median TIMP-1 level was 185 ng/mL (range: 22–523 ng/mL) and the mean level (±standard deviation) was 192 (±87) ng/mL. Serum TIMP-1 levels were found to be significantly increased in patients with preoperative CRP>12 mg/L and in those who died from rectal cancer or had cT4 tumours. No correlation was established for age, gender, carcinoembriogenic antigene (CEA) level, platelets count, histopathological grade, response to preoperative therapy, resectability and disease reappearance. On univariate analysis, various parameters favourably influenced one or more survival endpoints: TIMP-1 <170 ng/mL, CRP <12 mg/L, platelets count <290 10E9/L, CEA <3.4mg/L, age <69 years, male gender, early stage disease (cN0 and/or cT2–3), radical surgery (R0) and response to preoperative radiochemotherapy. In multivariate model, LRC was favourably influenced by N-downstage, DFS by lower CRP and N-downstage, DSS by lower CRP and N-downstage and OS by lower TIMP-1 level, lower CRP and N-downstage.

Conclusions

Although we did not find any association between pretreatment serum TIMP-1 levels and primary tumour response to preoperative radiochemotherapy in our cohort of patients with rectal cancer, TIMP-1 levels were recognized as an independent prognostic factor for OS in these patients.

The role of capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer treatment: an update

Preoperative infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and concurrent radiation therapy (RT) followed by total mesorectal surgery is the current standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LAR). When compared with postoperative 5-FU-based chemoradiation, this strategy is associated with significantly lower rates of local relapse, lower toxicity and better compliance. Capecitabine is a rationally designed oral prodrug that is converted into 5-FU by intracellular thymidine phosphorylase. Substitution of infusional 5-FU with capecitabine is an attractive option that provides a more convenient administration schedule and, possibly, increased efficacy. Indeed, incorporation of capecitabine in combined modality neoadjuvant therapy for LAR has been under intense investigation during the last 10 years. Phase I and II clinical trials showed that a regimen consisting of capecitabine 825mg/m(2) twice daily for 7 days/week continuous oral administration in combination with RT is an active and well tolerated regimen, thereby being the preferred concurrent regimen. The definitive demonstration that efficacy of capecitabine/RT is similar to 5-FU/RT has been provided by the NSABP-R-04 and the German Margit trials. One approach to improve outcomes in rectal cancer is to deliver a second RT-sensitizing drug with effective systemic activity. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan are therefore good candidates. However, two phase III trials demonstrated that incorporation of oxaliplatin to capecitabine with RT did not improve early outcomes and, by contrast, increased toxicity. Capecitabine has also been combined with irinotecan. This regimen showed encouraging results in phase I and II clinical trials, which led to an ongoing phase III clinical trial. New strategies with induction chemotherapy with or without chemoradiation prior to surgery are currently under investigation. Whether or not capecitabine has a role in this setting is being investigated in ongoing trials. Incorporation of agents directed towards new targets, such as anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies or antiangiogenic agents, in combination preoperative regimens, is being hampered by results of early trials in which efficacy outcomes with cetuximab were poor and an excessive rate of surgical complications with bevacizumab was observed. The lack of improvements in efficacy with the addition of cetuximab or bevacizumab in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer led to concerns about further development of these agents in rectal cancer. The role of capecitabine in the postoperative adjuvant setting is the aim of the ongoing Dutch SCRIPT trial. The prediction of response associated with capecitabine has been based on expression of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, as well as on gene expression arrays. All these procedures require further validation and should be considered as investigational. In conclusion, capecitabine can safely and effectively replace intravenous continuous infusion of 5-FU in the preoperative chemoradiation setting for rectal cancer management. The addition of other new antineoplastic agents to a fluoropyrimidine-based regimen remains investigational.

Neoadjuvant oral vs. infusional chemoradiotherapy on locally advanced rectal cancer: Prognostic factors

AIM

To evaluate the prognostic factors and impact on survival of neoadjuvant oral and infusional chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND

There is still no definitive consensus about the prognostic factors and the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on survival. Some studies have pointed to an improvement in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with tumor downstaging (TD) and nodal downstaging (ND).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A set of 159 patients with LARC were treated preoperatively. Group A - 112 patients underwent concomitant oral chemoradiotherapy: capecitabine or UFT + folinic acid. Group B - 47 patients submitted to concomitant chemoradiation with 5-FU in continuous infusion. 63.6% of patients were submitted to adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

GROUP A

pathologic complete response (pCR) - 18.7%; TD - 55.1%; ND - 76%; loco-regional response - 74.8%. Group B: pCR - 11.4%; TD - 50%; ND - 55.8%; LRR - 54.5%. The loco-regional control was 95.6%. There was no difference in survival between both groups. Those with loco-regional response had better PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor and nodal downstaging, loco-regional response and a normal CEA level turned out to be important prognostic factors in locally advanced rectal cancer. Nodal downstaging and loco-regional response were higher in Group A. Those with tumor downstaging and loco-regional response from Group A had better OS. Adjuvant chemotherapy had no impact on survival except in those patients with loco-regional response who achieved a higher PFS.

Comparison of neoadjuvant oral chemotherapy with UFT plus Folinic acid or Capecitabine concomitant with radiotherapy on locally advanced rectal cancer

AIM

To evaluate the differences in treatment response and the impact on survival with both oral agents (UFT and Capecitabine) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy administered concomitantly with radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND

There are still no studies comparing the use of neoadjuvant oral chemotherapy either with UFT plus Folinic acid or Capecitabine concomitant with radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A set of 112 patients with LARC were treated preoperatively. GROUP 1 - 61 patients underwent concomitant oral chemotherapy with Capecitabine (825 mg/m(2) twice daily). GROUP 2 - 51 patients submitted to concomitant oral chemotherapy with UFT (300 mg/m(2)/d) + Folinic acid (90 mg/d) and radiotherapy. 57.1% of patients were submitted to adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

GROUP 1: acute toxicity - 80.3%; pathological complete response (pCR) - 10.5%; tumor downstaging (TD) - 49.1%; nodal downstaging (ND) - 76.5%; loco-regional response (LRR) - 71.9%; toxicity to adjuvant chemotherapy - 75%. GROUP 2: acute toxicity - 80.4%; pCR - 28%; TD - 62%; ND - 75.6%; LRR - 78%; toxicity to adjuvant chemotherapy - 56%. There was no difference in survival nor loco-regional control between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with neoadjuvant oral UFT + Folinic acid had a higher rate of pathologic complete response than patients treated with Capecitabine concomitant with radiotherapy. There were no differences in downstaging, LRR, toxicity, survival or loco-regional control between both groups. There was a trend to a higher rate of toxicity to adjuvant chemotherapy in the Capecitabine group.

An update on preoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

Even in patients undergoing an optimal surgical technique (e.g., total mesorectal excision), radiotherapy provides a significant benefit in the local control of rectal cancer. Compared with postoperative treatment, chemoradiotherapy given preoperatively has been shown to decrease local recurrence rates and toxicity. Additionally, preoperative chemoradiotherapy permits the early identification of tumor responses to this cytotoxic treatment by surgical pathology. Pathological parameters reflecting the tumor response to chemoradiotherapy have been shown to be surrogate markers for long-term clinical outcomes. Post-chemoradiotherapy downstaging from cStage II-III to ypStage 0-I indicates a favorable prognosis, with no difference between ypStage 0 and ypStage I. Research is ongoing to develop useful tools (clinical, molecular, and radiological) for clinical determination of the pathologic chemoradiotherapeutic response before surgery, and possibly even before preoperative treatment. In the future, risk-adapted strategies, including intensification of preoperative therapy, conservative surgery, or the selective administration of postoperative chemotherapy, will be realized for locally-advanced rectal cancer patients based on their response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme a synthase 2 expression is associated with chemoradiotherapy responses in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy has become a standard treatment modality for locally advanced rectal cancer. Favorable long-term outcomes have been reported for patients with good responses to chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, predictive factors for chemoradiotherapy responses can be useful for their applicability to risk-adaptive therapy in patients with colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A synthase 2, a key enzyme in ketogenesis, is associated with the responses of colorectal cancer cells to chemoradiotherapy.

DESIGN

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A synthase 2 was identified by a 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis -based proteome analysis. It was analyzed in 12 colorectal cancer cells for associations with radiation or 5-fluorouracil susceptibility by Western blotting, 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium Bromide assay, and small interfering RNA transfection. Then, tumor tissues obtained from 45 patients with rectal cancer before chemoradiotherapy were analyzed by Western blotting for associations with chemoradiotherapy responses.

RESULTS

Expression of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A synthase 2 was significantly correlated with intrinsic radiation resistance of 12 cancer cells. Hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A synthase 2 expression was significantly affected by treatment with either 5-fluorouracil or radiation depending on cell types. The artificial suppression of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A synthase 2 did not result in the change of chemoradiation susceptibility in colorectal cancer cells. Nevertheless, in multivariate analyses, hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A synthase 2 expression in rectal cancer tissues was shown to be a significant predictive factor for chemoradiotherapy responses, as evaluated in terms of tumor regression grade and downstaging.

LIMITATIONS

Overall findings in vitro showed that the expression level of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A synthase 2 was highly variable depending on colon cancer cell types, and it cannot directly affect on chemoradiotherapy responses. The molecular mechanism underpinning the association between hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A synthase expression and chemoradiotherapy responses needs to be elucidated through future research.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A synthase 2 was associated with the effects of chemoradiotherapy on human colorectal cancer cells. Pretreatment levels of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A synthase 2 in rectal cancer may be useful in predicting the responses to chemoradiotherapy.

Simultaneous neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin for locally advanced rectal cancer. Treatment outcome outside clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Phase II trials of neoadjuvant treatment in UICC-TNM stage II and III rectal cancer with capecitabine and oxaliplatin demonstrated favourable rates on tumour regression with acceptable toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of 34 patients treated from 2005-2008 outside clinical trials (CTR) with neoadjuvant irradiation (45-50.4 Gy) and simultaneous capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14 and 22-35 and oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 22 and 29 (CAPOX). Twenty-six (77%) patients received one or two courses of capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 (XELOX) prior to simultaneous chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

UICC-TNM stage regression was observed in 60% (n = 20). Dworak's regression grades 3 and 4 were achieved in 18.2% (n = 6) and 15.1% (n = 5) of the patients. Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed in 53% (n = 8) of patients with a tumour of the lower rectum. Within the mean observation of 24 months, none of the patients relapsed locally, 1 patient had progressive disease and 5 patients (15%) relapsed distantly. Toxicity of grade 3 and 4 was mainly diarrhoea 18% (n = 6) and perianal pain 9% (n = 3). Nevertheless, severe cardiac events (n = 2), severe electrolyte disturbances (n = 2), and syncopes (n = 2) were observed as well.

CONCLUSION

Treatment efficacy and common toxicity are similar to the reports of phase I/II trials. However, several severe adverse events were observed in our cohort study. The predisposing factors for these events have yet to be studied and may have implications for the selection of patients outside CTR.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in MRI-staged high-risk rectal cancer in addition to or as an alternative to preoperative chemoradiation?

BACKGROUND

For patients with resectable rectal cancer chemoradiation (CRT) or short-course preoperative radiotherapy (SCPRT) reduces locoregional failure, without extending disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS). Compliance to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is poor. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) offers an alternative strategy.

METHODS

A systematic computerised database search identified studies exploring NACT alone or NACT preceding/succeeding radiation. The primary outcome measure was pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary outcome measures included acute toxicity, surgical morbidity, circumferential resection margin, locoregional failure, DFS and OS.

RESULTS

Four case reports, 12 phase I/II studies, 4 randomised phase II and one randomised phase III study evaluated chemotherapy before CRT. Four prospective studies reviewed chemotherapy after CRT. Three phase II studies investigated chemotherapy using FOLFOX plus bevacizumab without radiotherapy. In 24 studies of 1271 patients, pCR varied from 7% to 36%, but with no impact on metastatic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

NACT before CRT delivers does not compromise CRT but has not increased pCR rates, R0 resection rate, improved DFS or reduced metastases. NACT following CRT is an interesting strategy, and the utility of NACT alone could be explored compared with SCPRT or CRT in selected patients with rectal cancer where the impact of radiotherapy on DFS and OS is marginal.

Preoperative concomitant boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy with oral capecitabine in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer: a phase II trial

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with oral capecitabine in patients with locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer using a concomitant boost technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with resectable locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer (node-negative ≥T3 or any node-positive tumor) were eligible. The eligible patients received IMRT to 2 dose levels simultaneously (50.6 and 41.8 Gy in 22 fractions) with concurrent capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily 5 days/week. The primary end point included toxicity, postoperative complication, and pathological complete response rate (ypCR). The secondary endpoints included local recurrence rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Sixty-three eligible patients were enrolled; five patients did not undergo surgery. Of the 58 patients evaluable for pathologic response, the ypCR rate was 31.0% (95% CI 19.1-42.9). Grade 3 toxicities included diarrhea (9.5%), radiation dermatitis (3.2%), and neutropenia (1.6%). There was no Grade 4 toxicity reported. Four (6.9%) patients developed postoperative complications. Two-year local recurrence rate, PFS, and OS were 5.7%, 90.5%, and 96.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The design of preoperative concurrent boost IMRT with oral capecitabine could achieve high rate of ypCR with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Phase I/II study of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 for locally advanced, resectable rectal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess the maximum tolerability of a combination of S-1 and preoperative radiotherapy and to evaluate the feasibility and activity in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients (n = 30) with adenocarcinoma of the middle or lower rectum were enrolled in a phase I (n = 9) and/or phase II (n = 21) trial. A total dose of 45 Gy was delivered in 25 fractions over 5 weeks, and S-1 was orally administered twice a day on days 1-14 and 22-35. Surgical resection was scheduled 4-8 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation.

RESULTS

In phase I, the recommended dose (RD) of S-1 was 80 mg/m(2)/day, and the maximum-tolerated dose was never reached. A total of 27 cases, including the 6 RD cases in phase I, were enrolled in phase II. In phase II, a pathological complete response (pCR) was observed in 6/27 patients (22%), pathological downstaging was observed in 21/27 patients (78%), and a tumor volume reduction of 69 ± 22% was obtained. These results were similar to the previously reported pCR rates of 16-18%, pathological downstaging rates of 49-59%, and tumor volume reduction of 68% after chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine. Grade 3 adverse events consisted of one case of leukopenia (4%), 2 cases of anemia (7%) and 3 cases of diarrhea (11%). Overall, the adverse events were very mild. Hand-foot syndrome was not observed.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of chemoradiotherapy with S-1 seems to be equivalent to the efficacy reported for chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine, but the adverse events were much milder, although further study is warranted.

Recommendations and expert opinion on the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer in Spain

In Spain 22,000 new cases of colorectal cancer are diagnosed each year, with 13,075 deaths resulting from this disease. Around 70% of colorectal cancers are localised in the colon and 30% in the rectum. A group of Spanish experts established recommendations on what would be the best strategy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Adequate assessment of local tumour extension, including high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and endorectal ultrasound, is essential for successful treatment. The three cornerstones in the treatment of LARC are surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Most patients will need a total mesorectal excision (TME). Preoperative chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) is preferred for the majority of patients with T3/T4 disease and/or regional node involvement, and adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended after a patient-sharing decision. Capecitabine, after showing a trend in improved downstaging in neoadjuvant stratum and the convenience of its oral administration, represents an alternative to 5-FU as perioperative treatment of LARC.

No correlation between pretreatment serum CEA levels and tumor volume in locally advanced rectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Although serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels reflect tumor volume in rectal cancer patients intrapersonally, it is unclear interpersonally. We determined the correlation between pretreatment serum CEA levels and tumor volume.

METHODS

A total of 489 patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery between October 2001 and April 2007 were retrospectively evaluated. CEA levels were measured by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay, and magnetic resonance (MR) volumetry was performed using MR data. The correlation between CEA levels and tumor volume was assessed using linear regression analysis and one-way analysis of variance. The prognostic values of CEA levels and tumor volume for survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no significant correlation between CEA levels and tumor volume. The five-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 89.0%, 80.6% and 82.9%, and 72.0%, 70.0% and 60.3% in patients with CEA levels of ≤3 ng/ml, >3-10 ng/ml, and >10 ng/ml, respectively. Tumor volume had no prognostic value for either overall survival or disease-free survival

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment serum CEA levels were not correlated with tumor volume. While there was no correlation between tumor volume and survival, there was a positive correlation between CEA levels and survival.

Neoadjuvant capecitabine, radiotherapy, and bevacizumab (CRAB) in locally advanced rectal cancer: results of an open-label phase II study

Background

Preoperative capecitabine-based chemoradiation is a standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Here, we explored the safety and efficacy of the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine and concurrent radiotherapy for LARC.

Methods

Patients with MRI-confirmed stage II/III rectal cancer received bevacizumab 5 mg/kg i.v. 2 weeks prior to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by bevacizumab 5 mg/kg on Days 1, 15 and 29, capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily on Days 1-38, and concurrent radiotherapy 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/day, 5 days/week for 5 weeks + three 1.8 Gy/day), starting on Day 1. Total mesorectal excision was scheduled 6-8 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy. Tumour regression grades (TRG) were evaluated on surgical specimens according to Dworak. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR).

Results

61 patients were enrolled (median age 60 years [range 31-80], 64% male). Twelve patients (19.7%) had T3N0 tumours, 1 patient T2N1, 19 patients (31.1%) T3N1, 2 patients (3.3%) T2N2, 22 patients (36.1%) T3N2 and 5 patients (8.2%) T4N2. Median tumour distance from the anal verge was 6 cm (range 0-11). Grade 3 adverse events included dermatitis (n = 6, 9.8%), proteinuria (n = 4, 6.5%) and leucocytopenia (n = 3, 4.9%). Radical resection was achieved in 57 patients (95%), and 42 patients (70%) underwent sphincter-preserving surgery. TRG 4 (pCR) was recorded in 8 patients (13.3%) and TRG 3 in 9 patients (15.0%). T-, N- and overall downstaging rates were 45.2%, 73.8%, and 73.8%, respectively.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the feasibility of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with bevacizumab and capecitabine. The observed adverse events of neoadjuvant treatment are comparable with those previously reported, but the pCR rate was lower.

Prognostic significance of distribution of lymph node metastasis in advanced mid or low rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Few studies have focused on distribution of lymph node metastasis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic significance of the location of involved lymph nodes in patients with advanced mid or low rectal cancer.

METHODS

We defined proximal lymph node involvement (PLNp) as superior rectal and inferior mesenteric lymph node metastasis along the trunks of the supplying vessel, and mesorectal lymph node involvement (MLNp) as lymph node metastasis located within the mesorectum.

RESULTS

PLNp was identified in 67 patients (8.4%) of total 797 patients. Age <60 years (P=0.02), poorly differentiated/mucinous histologic type (P=0.011), and positive perineural invasion (P<0.001) were risk factors of PLNp in patients with node positive rectal cancer. Patients with PLNp had poorer oncologic outcomes than those without PLNp in terms of overall survival (P<0.001). For patients with node-positive rectal cancer, there was significant difference in the overall survival rate between PLNp and MLNp groups, regardless of N stage (P=0.025 for N1, P=0.009 for N2).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that PLNp is associated with adverse oncologic outcomes and has prognostic significance in patients with node positive mid or low rectal cancer.