Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for limited hepatic metastases

Prediction of SBRT response in liver cancer by combining original and delta cone-beam CT radiomics: a pilot study

This study aims to explore the feasibility of utilizing a combination of original and delta cone-beam CT (CBCT) radiomics for predicting treatment response in liver tumors undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). A total of 49 patients are included in this study, with 36 receiving 5-fraction SBRT, 3 receiving 4-fraction SBRT, and 10 receiving 3-fraction SBRT. The CBCT and planning CT images from liver cancer patients who underwent SBRT are collected to extract overall 547 radiomics features. The CBCT features which are reproducible and interchangeable with pCT are selected for modeling analysis. The delta features between fractions are calculated to depict tumor change. The patients with 4-fraction SBRT are only used for screening robust features. In patients receiving 5-fraction SBRT, the predictive ability of both original and delta CBCT features for two-level treatment response (local efficacy vs. local non-efficacy; complete response (CR) vs. partial response (PR)) is assessed by utilizing multivariable logistic regression with leave-one-out cross-validation. Additionally, univariate analysis is conducted to validate the capability of CBCT features in identifying local efficacy in patients receiving 3-fraction SBRT. In patients receiving 5-fraction SBRT, the combined models incorporating original and delta CBCT radiomics features demonstrate higher area under the curve (AUC) values compared to models using either original or delta features alone for both classification tasks. The AUC values for predicting local efficacy vs. local non-efficacy are 0.58 for original features, 0.82 for delta features, and 0.90 for combined features. For distinguishing PR from CR, the respective AUC values for original, delta and combined features are 0.79, 0.80, and 0.89. In patients receiving 3-fraction SBRT, eight valuable CBCT radiomics features are identified for predicting local efficacy. The combination of original and delta radiomics derived from fractionated CBCT images in liver cancer patients undergoing SBRT shows promise in providing comprehensive information for predicting treatment response.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases in oligometastatic disease

Oligometastatic cancers designate cancers in which the number of metastases is less than five, corresponding to a particular biological entity whose prognosis is situated between a localized and metastatic disease. The liver is one of the main sites of metastases. When patients are not suitable for surgery, stereotactic body radiotherapy provides high local control rate, although these data come mainly from retrospective studies, with no phase III study results. The need for a high therapeutic dose (biologically effective dose greater than 100Gy) while respecting the constraints on the organs at risk, and the management of respiratory movements require expertise and sufficient technical prerequisites. The emergence of new techniques such as MRI-guided radiotherapy could further increase the effectiveness of stereotactic radiotherapy of liver metastases, and thus improve the prognosis of these oligometastatic cancers.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver metastases with different respiratory motion management techniques

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been firmly established as a treatment choice for patients with oligometastases, as it has demonstrated both safety and efficacy by consistently achieving high rates of local control. Moreover, it offers potential survival benefits for carefully selected patients in real-world clinical settings.

METHODS

Between January 2008 and May 2020, a total of 149 patients (with 414 liver metastases) received treatment. The Active Breathing Coordinator device was used for 68 patients, while respiratory gating was used for 65 and abdominal compression was used for 16 patients. The most common histological finding was colorectal adenocarcinoma, with 37.6% of patients having three or more metastases, and 18% having two metastases. The prescribed dose ranged from 36 to 60 Gy, delivered in 3-5 fractions.

RESULTS

Local control rates at 2 and 3 years were 76.1% and 61.2%, respectively, with no instances of local recurrence after 3 years. Factors negatively impacting local control included colorectal histology, lower prescribed dose, and the occurrence of new liver metastases. The median overall survival from SBRT was 32 months, with the presence of metastases outside the liver and the development of new liver metastases after SBRT affecting survival. The median disease-free survival was 10 months. No substantial differences in both local control and survival were observed between the respiratory motion control techniques employed. Treatment tolerance was excellent, with only one patient experiencing acute grade IV thrombocytopenia and two patients suffering from ≥ grade II chronic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

For radical management of single or multiple liver metastases, SBRT is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option. Regardless of the technology employed, experienced physicians can achieve similarly positive outcomes. However, additional studies are required to elucidate prognostic factors that can facilitate improved patient selection.

Local Control Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Oligometastases: Lessons from a Quarter Century

The utilization of stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of liver metastasis has been widely studied and has demonstrated favorable local control outcomes. However, several predictive factors play a crucial role in the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy, such as the number and size (volume) of metastatic liver lesions, the primary tumor site (histology), molecular biomarkers (e.g., KRAS and TP53 mutation), the use of systemic therapy prior to SBRT, the radiation dose, and the use of advanced technology and organ motion management during SBRT. These prognostic factors need to be considered when clinical trials are designed to evaluate the efficacy of SBRT for liver metastases.

Unresectable Intermediate-Size (3-5 cm) Colorectal Liver Metastases: Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy Versus Microwave Ablation (COLLISION-XL): Protocol of a Phase II/III Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Although microwave ablation (MWA) has a low complication rate and good efficacy for small-size (≤ 3 cm) colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), local control decreases with increasing size. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is gaining interest as a potential means to treat intermediate-size CRLM and might be less susceptible to increasing volume. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of MWA to SBRT in patients with unresectable, intermediate-size (3-5 cm) CRLM.

METHODS

In this two-arm, multicentre phase II/ III randomized controlled trial, 68 patients with 1-3 unresectable, intermediate-size CRLM suitable for both MWA and SBRT, will be included. Patients will be treated with MWA or SBRT as randomised. The Primary endpoint is local tumour progression-free survival (LTPFS) at 1 year (intention-to-treat analysis). Main secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall and distant progression-free survival (DPFS), local control (LC) and procedural morbidity and mortality and assessment of pain and quality of life.

DISCUSSION

Current guidelines lack clear recommendations for the local treatment of liver only intermediate-size, unresectable CRLM and studies comparing curative intent SBRT and thermal ablation are scarce. Although safety and feasibility to eradicate tumours ≤ 5 cm have been established, both techniques suffer from lower LTPFS and LC rates for larger-size tumours. For the treatment of unresectable intermediate-size CRLM clinical equipoise has been reached. We have designed a two-armed phase II/ III randomized controlled trial directly comparing SBRT to MWA for unresectable CRLM 3-5 cm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1, phase II/ III Randomized controlled trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04081168, September 9th 2019.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for liver oligometastases

The liver is the first metastatic site in 15–25% of colorectal cancer patients and one of the first metastatic sites for lung and breast cancer patients.

A computed tomography (CT ) scan with contrast medium is a standard procedure for assessing liver lesions but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characterizes small lesions better thanks to its high soft-tissue contrast. Positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT ) plays a complementary role in the diagnosis of liver metastases. Triphasic (arterial, venous and time-delayed) acquisition of contrast-medium CT images is the first step in treatment planning. Since the liver exhibits a relatively wide mobility due to respiratory movements and bowel filling, appropriate techniques are needed for target identification and motion management. Contouring requires precise recognition of target lesion edges. Information from contrast MRI and/or PET-CT is crucial as they best visualize metastatic disease in the parenchyma. Even though different fractionation schedules were reported, doses and fractionation schedules for liver stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) have not yet been established. The best local control rates were obtained with BED₁₀ values over 100 Gy. Local control rates from most retrospective studies, which were limited by short follow-ups and included different primary tumors with intrinsic heterogeneity, ranged from 60% to 90% at 1 and 2 years. The most common SRT-related toxicities are increases in liver enzymes, hyperbilirubinemia and hypoalbuminemia. Overall, late toxicity is mild even in long-term follow-ups.

Novel Clinically Weight-Optimized Dynamic Conformal Arcs (WO-DCA) for Liver SBRT: A Comparison with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of shortening the duration of liver stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) without jeopardizing dosimetry or conformity by utilizing weight-optimized dynamic conformal arcs (WO-DCA) as opposed to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for tumors away from critical structures.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with liver metastasis were included, previously treated with 50 Gy in 4 fractions with VMAT technique using two partial coplanar arcs of 6 MV beams delivered in high-definition multi-leaf collimator (HD-MLC). Two coplanar partial WO-DCA were generated on Pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS) for each patient; and MLC aperture around the planning target volume (PTV) was automatically generated at different margins for both arcs and maintained dynamically around the target during arc rotation. Weight of the two arcs using optimization method was adjusted between the arcs to maximize tumor coverage and protect organs at risk (OAR) based on the RTOG-0438 protocol.

RESULTS

The WO-DCA plans successfully "agreed" with the standard VMAT for OAR (liver, spinal cord, stomach, duodenum, small bowel, and heart) and PTV (Dmean, D98%, D2%, CI, and GI), with superior mean quality assurance (QA) pass rate (97.06 vs 93.00 for VMAT; P < 0.001 and t = 8.87). Similarly, the WO-DCA technique additionally reduced the beam-on time (3.26 vs 4.43; P < 0.001) and monitor unit (1860 vs 2705 for VMAT; P < 0.001) values significantly.

CONCLUSION

The WO-DCA plans might minimize small-field dosimetry errors and defeat patient-specific VMAT QA requirements due to the omission of MLC beam modulation through the target volume. The WO-DCA plans may additionally enable faster treatment delivery times and lower OAR without sacrificing target doses in SBRT of liver tumors away from critical structures.

Long-term outcome of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for patient with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate clinical outcome and predicting factors of local failures in patients with colorectal cancer treated for unresectable liver metastases with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We restrospectively reviewed the medical records of 67 patients treated with the Cyberknife SBRT system for 99 hepatic metastases between January 2007 and December 2015 in our center. In total, 37.5 to 54.0Gy in 3 to 5 fractions were prescribed to the 80% isodose line. Local control (LC), intrahepatic progression incidence, Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS) and toxicity were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 47 months (IQR, 28-59 months). The median OS was 53 months, the 2-year OS and PFS rates were 81.4% and 54.0%. The 1- and 2-year LC rates were 86.6% and 72.4%. In the multivariate analysis, the degree of differentiation was the only prognostic factor for LC (HR 0.31, 95% CI, 0.10-0.98, P=0.046). Margin expansion>5mm was not associated with a better LC (HR 0.72, 95% CI, 0.38-1.37, P=0.317). Performans Status≥2 (HR 3.27, 95% CI, 1.07-9.98, P=0.038), chemotherapy for metastases before SBRT (HR 0.36, 95% CI, 0.18-0.75, P=0.006) and regional lymph node at diagnosis (HR 2.19, 95% CI, 1.09-4.43, P=0.029) were independent prognostic factors for OS. We report 2 cases of grade≥3 toxicity (3.0%) - one grade 3 acute nausea and one grade 3 late gastric ulcer.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic body radiation therapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment that allow high LC for liver metastases from colorectal cancer during the first two years. A prescription dose of 45Gy in 3 fractions to the 80% isodose line with a risk adapted schedule to respect Organ At Risk constraints allows a low rate of toxicity.

Influence of intra- and interfraction motion on planning target volume margin in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy using breath hold

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate intra- and interfraction motion during liver stereotactic body radiation therapy for the purpose of planning target volume (PTV) margin estimation, comparing deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and deep expiration breath hold (DEBH).

Methods and materials

Pre- and posttreatment kV cone beam computed tomography (CT) images were acquired for patients with liver cancer who were treated using stereotactic body radiation therapy with DIBH or DEBH. A total of 188 images were analyzed from 18 patients. Positioning errors were determined based on a comparison with planning CT images and matching to the liver. Treatment did not proceed until errors were ≤3 mm. Standard deviations of random and systematic errors resulting from this image matching process were used to calculate PTV margin estimates.

Results

DIBH errors are generally larger than DEBH errors, especially in the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior directions. Posttreatment errors tend to be larger than pretreatment errors, especially for DIBH. Standard deviations of random errors are larger than those of systematic errors. Considering both pre- and posttreatment cone beam CT images, PTV margins for DIBH and DEBH are estimated as anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, right-left = (5.7, 6.3, 3.0) mm and (3.1, 3.4, 2.8) mm, respectively.

Conclusions

This study suggests that DEBH results in more reproducible target positioning, which could in turn justify the use of smaller PTV margins.

Update on optimal treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer from the AGITG expert meeting: ESMO congress 2019

Introduction: Outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer are improving, due to the tailoring of therapy enabled by better understanding of clinical behavior according to molecular subtype.Areas covered: A review of the literature and recent conference presentations was undertaken on the topic of systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. This review summarizes expert discussion of the current evidence for therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on molecular subgrouping.Expert opinion: EGFR-targeted and VEGF-targeted antibodies are now routinely incorporated into treatment strategies for mCRC. EGFR-targeted antibodies are restricted to patients with extended RAS wild-type profiles, with evidence that they should be further restricted to patients with left-sided tumors. Clinically distinct treatment pathways based on tumor RAS, BRAF, HER2 and MMR status, are now clinically applicable. Evidence suggests therapy for additional subgroups will soon be defined; the most advanced being for patients with KRAS G12 C mutation and gene TRK fusion defects.

Metastatic disease in head & neck oncology

The head and neck district represents one of the most frequent sites of cancer, and the percentage of metastases is very high in both loco-regional and distant areas. Prognosis refers to several factors: a) stage of disease; b) loco-regional relapses; c) distant metastasis. At diagnosis, distant metastases of head and neck cancers are present in about 10% of cases with an additional 20-30% developing metastases during the course of their disease. Diagnosis of distant metastases is associated with unfavorable prognosis, with a median survival of about 10 months. The aim of the present review is to provide an update on distant metastasis in head and neck oncology. Recent achievements in molecular profiling, interaction between neoplastic tissue and the tumor microenvironment, oligometastatic disease concepts, and the role of immunotherapy have all deeply changed the therapeutic approach and disease control. Firstly, we approach topics such as natural history, epidemiology of distant metastases and relevant pathological and radiological aspects. Focus is then placed on the most relevant clinical aspects; particular attention is reserved to tumours with distant metastasis and positive for EBV and HPV, and the oligometastatic concept. A substantial part of the review is dedicated to different therapeutic approaches. We highlight the role of immunotherapy and the potential effects of innovative technologies. Lastly, we present ethical and clinical perspectives related to frailty in oncological patients and emerging difficulties in sustainable socio-economical governance.

A retrospective cohort study of low-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for unresectable liver metastases

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for the treatment of unresectable liver metastases.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with unresectable liver metastases treated with IMRT were enrolled from January 2003 to September 2016. The median longest diameter of the lesions was 3.3 cm (range, 1.6-16.7 cm). The fraction dose ranged from 2 to 5.2 Gy, with a median total dose of 50 Gy (range, 30-60 Gy).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 9.2 months (range, 2.1-48.8 months). The overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 46.4% and 27.4%, respectively. The 1-year local control rate was 69.8%. The 1-year progression-free survival rate was 26.3%. One patient had grade 4 liver dysfunction. One case of grade 4 leukopenia and one case of grade 3 leukopenia occurred, and one case of grade 3 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia was observed.

CONCLUSION

IMRT may be a promising and safe treatment for unresectable liver metastases and can be used as a treatment option.

High versus low dose Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for hepatic metastases

•

SBRT for liver metastases is a safe alternative for surgical resection or ablation.

•

High dose (>100 Gy) SBRT provides better local control than low dose (≤100 Gy) SBRT.

•

Toxicity rates of SBRT are low and do not increase after dose escalation.

•

Dose escalation is positively associated with overall survival.

Introduction

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for patients with liver metastases. This study evaluated the impact of high versus low dose image-guided SBRT of hepatic metastases.

Methods and materials

This is a single-center retrospective study of patients with liver metastases treated with SBRT. For analyses, patients were divided into two groups: ≤100 Gy and >100 Gy near-minimum Biological Effective Doses (BED_98%). The main outcomes were local control (LC), toxicity and overall survival (OS). Cox regression analyses were performed to determine prognostic variables on LC and OS.

Results

Ninety patients with 97 liver metastases (77% colorectal) were included. Median follow-up was 28.6 months. The two-year LC rates in the ≤100 Gy and >100 Gy BED_98% group were 60% (CI: 41–80%) and 90% (CI: 80–100%), respectively (p = 0.004). Grade 3 toxicity occurred in 7% vs 2% in the ≤100 Gy and >100 Gy group (p = 0.23). Two-year OS rates in the ≤100 Gy and >100 Gy group were 48% (CI: 32–65%) and 85% (CI: 73–97%), respectively (p = 0.007). In multivariable Cox regression analyses, group dose and tumor volume were significantly correlated with LC (HR: 3.61; p = 0.017 and HR: 1.01; p = 0.005) and OS (HR: 2.38; p = 0.005 and HR: 1.01; p = <0.0001).

Conclusion

High dose SBRT provides significantly better local control and overall survival than low dose SBRT without increasing toxicity. When surgical resection is not feasible, high dose SBRT provides an effective and safe treatment for liver metastases.

Correlation between Biological Effective Dose and Radiation-induced Liver Disease from Hypofractionated Radiotherapy

Background

The prevention of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) is very significant in ensuring a safe radiation treatment and high quality of life.

Aims and Objectives

The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlation of physical and biological effective dose (BED) metrics with liver toxicity from hypo-fractionated liver radiotherapy.

Materials and Methods

41 hypo-fractionated patients in 2 groups were evaluated for classic radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) and chronic RILD, respectively. Patients were graded for effective toxicity (post-treatment minus pre-treatment) using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. Physical dose (PD) distributions were converted to BED. The V_10Gy, V_15Gy, V_20Gy, V_25Gy and V_30Gy physical dose-volume metrics were used in the analysis together with their respective BED-converted metrics of V_16.7Gy3, V_30Gy3, V_46.7Gy3, V_66.7Gy3 and V_90Gy3. All levels were normalized to their respective patient normal liver volumes (NLV) and evaluated for correlation to RILD. Results were measured quantitatively using R² regression analysis.

Results

The classic RILD group had median follow-up time of 1.9 months and the average PD-NLV normalized V_10Gy, V_15Gy, V_20Gy, V_25Gy and V_30Gy metrics per grade were plotted against RILD yielding R² correlations of 0.84, 0.72, 0.73, 0.65 and 0.70, respectively while the BED-volume metrics of V_16.7Gy3, V_30Gy3, V_46.7Gy3, V_66.7Gy3 and V_90Gy3 resulted in correlation values of 0.84, 0.74, 0.66, 0.78 and 0.74, respectively. BED compared to PD showed a statistically significant (p=.03) increase in R² for the classic RILD group. Chronic RILD group had median follow-up time of 12.3 months and the average PD-NLV normalized V_10Gy, V_15Gy, V_20Gy, V_25Gy and V_30Gy metrics per grade were plotted against RILD grade yielding R² correlations of 0.48, 0.92, 0.88, 0.90 and 0.99 while the BED-volume metrics of V_16.7Gy3, V_30Gy3, V_46.7Gy3, V_66.7Gy3 and V_90Gy3 resulted in correlation values of 0.43, 0.94, 0.99, 0.21 and 0.00, respectively.

Conclusion

The strong correlations of the V_10Gy and V_15Gy PD-volume metrics as well as the V_16.7Gy3 (BED of V_10Gy) to both classic and chronic RILD imply the appropriateness of the current 15_Gy evaluation level for liver toxicity with hypo-fractionated treatments.

[Liver stereotactic body radiotherapy: Clinical features and technical consequences, results. Which treatment machine in which situation?]

Liver stereotactic body radiotherapy is a developing technique for the treatment of primary tumours and metastases. Its implementation is complex because of the particularities of the treated organ and the comorbidities of the patients. However, this technique is a treatment opportunity for patients otherwise in therapeutic impasse. The scientific evidence of liver stereotactic body radiotherapy has been considered by the French health authority as insufficient for its widespread use outside specialized and experienced centers, despite a growing and important number of retrospective and prospective studies, but few comparative data. This article focuses on the specific features of stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver treatments and the results of published studies of liver stereotactic body radiotherapy performed with classic linear accelerators and dedicated radiosurgery units.

[Tolerance of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for hepatic tumours]

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of stereotactic radiation therapy for primary and secondary liver tumours in Jean-Perrin cancer centre (Clermont-Ferrand, France) in terms of efficacy and safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between December 2013 and June 2016, 25 patients were included. Treatment was performed on a linear accelerator Novalis TX^®. The prescription dose was 42 to 60Gy in three to five fractions. Local control at 1 year was evaluated with modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) and RECIST criteria. Acute and late toxicity were evaluated with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 criteria.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 10.5 months. Treatment tolerance was good with few side effects grade 3 or above, no acute toxicity and only one late toxicity. We have highlighted that hepatic artery haemorrhage was associated with the presence of a biliary prosthesis in contact with the artery (P=0.006) and in the irradiation field. There was no correlation with the dose delivered to the artery and hepatic artery haemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic radiation therapy for liver tumours allows a good local control with few secondary effects. Caution should be exercised when treating patients with biliary prostheses in the vicinity of the target volume because there is a risk of haemorrhage of the hepatic artery in contact with the prosthesis.

NRG Oncology/RTOG 0438: A Phase 1 Trial of Highly Conformal Radiation Therapy for Liver Metastases

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the feasibility and maximally tolerated dose of hypofractionated, conformal radiation therapy (RT) in patients with liver metastases.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nonsurgical patients with ≤5 liver metastases (sum of maximal diameter of all lesions ≤8 cm) were included in the study. There were 4 dose levels: 35 Gy, 40 Gy (starting level), 45 Gy, and 50 Gy, in 10 fractions. The clinical target volume included metastases identified on contrast computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging with a 5-mm margin within the liver. The planning target volume margin ranged from 4 to 30 mm, depending on breathing motion. Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as RT-related grade ≥4 hepatic or gastrointestinal toxicities or thrombocytopenia occurring within 90 days of the start of RT.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients with metastases from colorectal (8 patients), breast (7 patients) and other malignancies (11 patients) were enrolled between November 2005 and December 2010. Twenty-three patients were evaluable (8, 7, and 8 on the 40, 45, and 50 Gy dose levels, respectively). Two patients assigned to 50 Gy received 35 Gy owing to normal tissue limits, so 2 additional patients were treated to 50 Gy. There were no dose-limiting toxicities on any of the dose levels. On the 45 Gy dose level, 1 patient developed reversible grade 3 enteritis (37 days from RT start) and diarrhea (22 days); another patient developed grade 3 lymphopenia (23 days). At the 50 Gy dose level, 1 patient had grade 3 hyperglycemia (74 days), and another patient developed grade 3 lymphopenia (13 days), colonic hemorrhage (325 days), and colonic gastrointestinal obstruction (325 days). With a potential median follow-up of 66.1 months (range, 34.6-89.0 months), no other late toxicities were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of liver metastases with 50 Gy in 10 fractions was feasible and safe in a multi-institutional setting.

Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Non-breast or Prostate Cancer Oligometastases: A Tail of Survival Beyond 10 Years

Purpose and Objective(s): We sought to analyze the long-term follow-up of patients treated with hypofractionated, stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) for oligometastases from malignancies other than breast or prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: From 2001 to 2006, 82 cancer patients with 1-5 radiographically apparent metastatic lesions (in 1-3 organs) from primary sites other than breast or prostate cancer, were enrolled on a prospective study of HSRT. Freedom from widespread metastasis (FFWM) was defined from date of enrollment until death, an event (i.e., widespread distant metastasis not amenable to local therapy), or last radiographic study. Local recurrence was scored as an event if pathologically confirmed or if a treated lesion increased by ≥20% using RECIST criteria. Prognostic variables were assessed using Cox regression analysis. Results: The mean age was 61 ± 11 years, with a male to female ratio of 46:36. The most common metastatic sites were liver (50%), lung (48%), thoracic lymph nodes (18%), and bone (5%). Sixty-one patients (74%) had 1 involved organ and 18 (22%) had 1 lesion treated. The preferred dose-fractionation scheduled was 50 Gy in 10 fractions (52 patients). The median follow-up was 1.7 years. Eleven patients lived >5 years, and 6 lived >10 years. The 5-year OS, PFS, FFWM, and LC rates were 13.4, 7.3, 18.3, and 63.4%, and the 10-years OS, PFS, FFWM, and patient LC rates were 7.3, 6.1, 13.4, and 62.2%, respectively. A greater net gross tumor volume (GTV) was significantly adverse for OS (p < 0.01) and LC (p < 0.01). For FFWM, net GTV was not a significant factor (p = 0.14). Four patients remain alive at >13 years from enrollment and treatment, without evidence of active disease. Conclusion: A small subset of select non-breast, non-prostate cancer patients with limited metastasis treated with HSRT are long-term survivors. Net GTV is a significant factor for tumor control and survival. Further research is needed to help better select patients most likely to benefit from local therapy for metastatic disease.

The impact of local control on overall survival after stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer: a combined analysis of 388 patients with 500 metastases

BACKGROUND

The aim of this analysis was to model the effect of local control (LC) on overall survival (OS) in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver or lung metastases from colorectal cancer.

METHODS

The analysis is based on pooled data from two retrospective SBRT databases for pulmonary and hepatic metastases from 27 centers from Germany and Switzerland. Only patients with metastases from colorectal cancer were considered to avoid histology as a confounding factor. An illness-death model was employed to model the relationship between LC and OS.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-eight patients with 500 metastatic lesions (lung n = 209, liver n = 291) were included and analyzed. Median follow-up time for local recurrence assessment was 12.1 months. Ninety-nine patients with 112 lesions experienced local failure. Seventy-one of these patients died after local failure. Median survival time was 27.9 months in all patients and 25.4 months versus 30.6 months in patients with and without local failure after SBRT. The baseline risk of death after local failure exceeds the baseline risk of death without local failure at 10 months indicating better survival with LC.

CONCLUSION

In CRC patients with lung or liver metastases, our findings suggest improved long-term OS by achieving metastatic disease control using SBRT in patients with a projected OS estimate of > 12 months.

Role of radiotherapy in the treatment of metastatic head and neck cancer

In metastatic or locally advanced head and neck tumors that present in frail patients or after chemotherapy progression, radiotherapy is normally used as a palliative treatment, with a high rate of symptom palliation and improvement in quality of life. However, there is controversy about what the optimal regimen is. Moreover, despite the poor prognosis of metastatic head and neck cancer, different retrospective studies have shown that a minority of patients with oligometastatic disease experience prolonged disease-free survival after adding curative radiotherapy treatment to the metastatic disease and/or primary tumor. Different retrospective studies have identified clinical prognostic factors that may be used to select candidate patients with metastatic head and neck cancer for a radical approach with radiotherapy. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the role of radiotherapy in metastatic and locally advanced head and neck tumors.

Predictive Factors for Response and Survival in a Cohort of Oligometastatic Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

This study evaluated patients, treatment, or disease characteristics that could predict response to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and survival in a database of patients with oligometastatic disease from different solid tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients treated with SBRT for oligometastatic disease between 2014 and 2015 were included. Patients were defined as oligometastatic if they were affected by a maximum of 5 active lesions in 3 different sites. They had to be treated with SBRT with radical intent.

RESULTS

The study included 358 patients. With a median follow-up of 31.83 months, local control at 6 and 24 months was 94.6% and 78.9%, respectively. Distant progression was recorded in 279 patients (77.9%). Progression-free survival at 6 and 24 months was 66.1% and 18.4%, respectively. At last follow-up, 195 patients (54.5%) were still alive in 59 cases with no evidence of disease. The median overall survival (OS) was 34.7 months (95% confidence interval, 29.66-43.83). OS at 6 and 24 months was 96.07% and 63.57%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the presence of lung metastases (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50 [0.33-0.75]; P = .001) and nodal metastases (HR, 0.44 [0.24-0.78]; P = .005) was related to longer OS. Primary lung cancer (HR, 1.89 [1.14-3.13]; P = .013), increasing age (HR, 1.02 [1.01-1.04]; P = .002), and the presence of metastatic sites other than the irradiated ones (HR, 2.19 [1.39-3.43]; P = .001) were all independent predictors of shorter OS. Local response was associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT for patients with oligometastatic disease is effective. Local response is strongly correlated with patients'' prognosis, also underlying its relevance in a metastatic setting.

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastatic patients: developing of a response predictive model

OBJECTIVES

Treatment of oligometastatic patients is a current challenge in radiation oncology. Aim of this study is to define a dose-response relationship for hypofractionated radiotherapy of oligometastases.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of metastases treated by hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy was performed. Delivered dose was calculated both as biological effective dose (BED₁₀), and as ratio between BED₁₀ and the logarithm of metastasis volume (BED₁₀ logVolume Ratio, BVR). Two dose-response models were defined by logistic regression. The fitted outcome was the Metastases Complete Response (MCR). Performances of the models were assessed by area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and by bootstrap calibration of original data. BED₁₀ and BVR impact on survival outcomes has been evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients with 79 metastases were analyzed. AUC and calibration of BVR-based logistic model showed better accuracy in predicting MCR with respect to BED₁₀-based model. No significant difference between the two ROCs was observed (De Long test p value > 0.05), but significant discordance in calibration resulted in the BED₁₀ model (p value < 0.05 in Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness of fit test). BVR returned also better results in multivariate analyses for survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The ratio between BED₁₀ and the logarithm of metastasis volume (BVR), as a corrective factor for fitting the probability of metastases response to stereotactic radiotherapy, could be a tool for evaluating and prescribing treatments for oligometastatic disease. BVR can be useful for producing more reliable survival statistics too.

Beyond the Knife: The Evolving Nonsurgical Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer

In patients with liver-limited oligometastatic disease, the goal of treatment can be curative intent. Historically, this was accomplished in patients presenting with upfront resectable disease. The availability of increasingly efficacious chemotherapy and biologic combinations with encouraging response rates led to the potential to convert unresectable disease to resectability. Beyond the backbone of surgery, we now have a portfolio of locoregional strategies to consider.From an interventional radiology perspective, the use of portal vein embolization can facilitate hypertrophy of the liver in anticipation of resection, thus converting unresectable disease to one amenable to a surgical approach with curative intent. Technological advances in liver-directed ablative therapies have afforded the possibility of eliminate radiographically evident disease with the hope for long-term disease control. Advanced radiotherapy techniques are further increasing the therapeutic options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Improvements in external-beam radiotherapy over the past 2 decades include image-guided radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy, and proton-beam therapy. Finally, selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with microspheres labeled with the β-emitter ⁹⁰Y enable targeted delivery of radiation to hepatic tumors. A coordinated multidisciplinary approach is required to integrate these nonsurgical adjuncts in an evidence-based manner to optimize outcomes for patients with potentially resectable metastatic disease. In this article, we summarize recent developments in systemic therapy, radiotherapy, and interventional liver-directed therapies that have changed the treatment landscape for patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer.

Additional chemotherapy improved local control and overall survival after stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with oligo-recurrence

Background

Oligo-recurrence has been considered to confer improved prognosis than other oligometastatic conditions, and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is considered as an option of local therapy for lung or liver metastases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of SBRT for lung and liver oligo-recurrent lesions and evaluate predictive factors for local control and prognosis.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients who presented with 1–3 matachronous lung or liver metastases, and treated with SBRT between May 2013 and March 2016 at a single institution. All patients harbored a controlled primary lesion. Patients with < 6 months of follow-up were excluded. Local control, progression free survival, and overall survival rates were analyzed according to the Kaplan–Meier product limit method. Univariable log-rank and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to clarify predictive factors for local control and prognosis. Toxicity was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.

Results

Seventy-six patients with a total of 70 and 44 lung and liver lesions were included. The median follow-up period was 21 (range, 7–43) months. The 1-year local control, progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 89, 38 and 96%, respectively. Smaller gross tumor volume and additional chemotherapy after SBRT were significant predictive factors for better local control (p = 0.005 and p = 0.047), and the presence of a single metastatic lesion was a significant factor of good progression free survival (p = 0.008). Additional chemotherapy after SBRT was not a significant predictive factor but conferred to better overall survival (p = 0.078). Among colorectal cancer patients, post SBRT chemotherapy was significantly associated with better OS (p = 0.025). Over grade 3 adverse event was seen in only one patient.

Conclusion

SBRT is a safe and effective treatment for patients with lung and liver oligo-recurrence. Additional chemotherapy after SBRT improved local control, and single metastatic lesion was a significant predictive factor of better PFS in this study. Among colorectal cancer patients, additional chemotherapy after SBRT significantly associated better OS.

Approach to oligometastatic disease in head and neck cancer, on behalf of the GORTEC

Median survival for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) patients is about 10 months after first-line best systemic treatment. We aimed to assess current approaches of oligometastatic HNSCC patients by the analysis of current concept and published data (1995–2017) in this population. Five-year survival rates are over 20% in selected patients who undergo metastasis-directed therapy by either surgery or stereotactic irradiation. Human papillomavirus(+) HNSCC patients have more disseminated metastases but respond more favorably and also benefit from ablative treatments. Treatments of oligometastases are expanding rapidly. Unmet needs include revised imaging follow-up strategies to detect metastases earlier, identification of predictive noninvasive biomarkers for treatment guidance, assessment and corrections of biases in current studies and randomized clinical trials.

Influence of deformable image registration on 4D dose simulation for extracranial SBRT: A multi-registration framework study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of deformable image registration approaches on correspondence model-based 4D dose simulation in extracranial SBRT by means of open source deformable image registration (DIR) frameworks.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Established DIR algorithms of six different open source DIR frameworks were considered and registration accuracy evaluated using freely available 4D image data. Furthermore, correspondence models (regression-based correlation of external breathing signal measurements and internal structure motion field) were built and model accuracy evaluated. Finally, the DIR algorithms were applied for motion field estimation in radiotherapy planning 4D CT data of five lung and five liver lesion patients, correspondence model formation, and model-based 4D dose simulation. Deviations between the original, statically planned and the 4D-simulated VMAT dose distributions were analyzed and correlated to DIR accuracy differences.

RESULTS

Registration errors varied among the DIR approaches, with lower DIR accuracy translating into lower correspondence modeling accuracy. Yet, for lung metastases, indices of 4D-simulated dose distributions widely agreed, irrespective of DIR accuracy differences. In contrast, liver metastases 4D dose simulation results strongly vary for the different DIR approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Especially in treatment areas with low image contrast (e.g. the liver), DIR-based 4D dose simulation results strongly depend on the applied DIR algorithm, drawing resulting dose simulations and indices questionable.

The SBRT database initiative of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO): patterns of care and outcome analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver oligometastases in 474 patients with 623 metastases

BACKGROUND

The intent of this pooled analysis as part of the German society for radiation oncology (DEGRO) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) initiative was to analyze the patterns of care of SBRT for liver oligometastases and to derive factors influencing treated metastases control and overall survival in a large patient cohort.

METHODS

From 17 German and Swiss centers, data on all patients treated for liver oligometastases with SBRT since its introduction in 1997 has been collected and entered into a centralized database. In addition to patient and tumor characteristics, data on immobilization, image guidance and motion management as well as dose prescription and fractionation has been gathered. Besides dose response and survival statistics, time trends of the aforementioned variables have been investigated.

RESULTS

In total, 474 patients with 623 liver oligometastases (median 1 lesion/patient; range 1–4) have been collected from 1997 until 2015. Predominant histologies were colorectal cancer (n = 213 pts.; 300 lesions) and breast cancer (n = 57; 81 lesions). All centers employed an SBRT specific setup. Initially, stereotactic coordinates and CT simulation were used for treatment set-up (55%), but eventually were replaced by CBCT guidance (28%) or more recently robotic tracking (17%). High variance in fraction (fx) number (median 1 fx; range 1–13) and dose per fraction (median: 18.5 Gy; range 3–37.5 Gy) was observed, although median BED remained consistently high after an initial learning curve. Median follow-up time was 15 months; median overall survival after SBRT was 24 months. One- and 2-year treated metastases control rate of treated lesions was 77% and 64%; if maximum isocenter biological equivalent dose (BED) was greater than 150 Gy EQD2Gy, it increased to 83% and 70%, respectively. Besides radiation dose colorectal and breast histology and motion management methods were associated with improved treated metastases control.

CONCLUSION

After an initial learning curve with regards to total cumulative doses, consistently high biologically effective doses have been employed translating into high local tumor control at 1 and 2 years. The true impact of histology and motion management method on treated metastases control deserve deeper analysis. Overall survival is mainly influenced by histology and metastatic tumor burden.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver metastasis - clinical outcomes from the international multi-institutional RSSearch® Patient Registry

Background

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment option for liver metastases in patients unsuitable for surgery. We investigated factors associated with clinical outcomes for liver metastases treated with SBRT from a multi-center, international patient registry.

Methods

Patients with liver metastases treated with SBRT were identified in the RSSearch® Patient Registry. Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics associated with treatment outcomes were assessed. Dose fractionations were normalized to BED₁₀. Overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) were evaluated using Kaplan Meier analysis and log-rank test.

Results

The study included 427 patients with 568 liver metastases from 25 academic and community-based centers. Median age was 67 years (31–91 years). Colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) was the most common primary cancer. 73% of patients received prior chemotherapy. Median tumor volume was 40 cm³ (1.6–877 cm³), median SBRT dose was 45 Gy (12–60 Gy) delivered in a median of 3 fractions [1–5]. At a median follow-up of 14 months (1–91 months) the median overall survival (OS) was 22 months. Median OS was greater for patients with CRC (27 mo), breast (21 mo) and gynecological (25 mo) metastases compared to lung (10 mo), other gastro-intestinal (GI) (18 mo) and pancreatic (6 mo) primaries (p < 0.0001). Smaller tumor volumes (< 40 cm³) correlated with improved OS (25 months vs 15 months p = 0.0014). BED₁₀ ≥ 100 Gy was also associated with improved OS (27 months vs 15 months p < 0.0001). Local control (LC) was evaluable in 430 liver metastases from 324 patients. Two-year LC rates was better for BED₁₀ ≥ 100 Gy (77.2% vs 59.6%) and the median LC was better for tumors < 40 cm³ (52 vs 39 months). There was no difference in LC based on histology of the primary tumor.

Conclusions

In a large, multi-institutional series of patients with liver metastasis treated with SBRT, reasonable LC and OS was observed. OS and LC depended on dose and tumor volume, while OS varied by primary tumor. Future prospective trials on the role of SBRT for liver metastasis from different primaries in the setting of multidisciplinary management including systemic therapy, is warranted.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01885299.

[Local ablative radiotherapy of oligometastatic colorectal cancer]

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) often presents as oligometastatic disease. Currently available intensive systemic treatment regimens, including combination chemotherapy and molecular targeted agents, result in tumor response and transient to long-term disease control in a high percentage of patients, thus raising the question of further management. Secondary resection and ablation, e.g. by surgery or radiofrequency may contribute to long-term survival and even be curative or at least allow a relevant chemotherapy-free interval. These approaches are often limited by the anatomical site, invasiveness and morbidity of the respective procedure. With stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) metastases can be treated with very high efficiency in only a few sessions and achieving long-term control.

OBJECTIVES

Identification of clinical studies investigating the use of SBRT for treatment of oligometastases in CRC patients. Control rates in liver and lung metastases and survival after SBRT. Toxicity and side effects of the treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A literature search was carried out for prospective and retrospective studies on local SBRT.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The SBRT procedure has become a valid treatment option for patients with oligometastatic CRC and should also be considered in clinical practice as an alternative to surgical treatment of metastases or other local ablative techniques.

[Stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver tumors: State of the art]

Thanks to the improvement in radiotherapy physics, biology, computing and imaging, patients presenting with liver tumors can be efficiently treated by radiation. Radiotherapy has been included in liver tumors treatment guidelines at all disease stages. Liver stereotactic radiotherapy has to be preferred to standard fractionated radiotherapy whenever possible, as potentially more efficient because of higher biological equivalent dose. Liver stereotactic radiotherapy planning and delivery require extensive experience and optimal treatment quality at every step, thus limiting its availability to specialized centres. Multicentre studies are difficult to develop due to a large technical heterogeneity. Respiratory management, image guidance and immobilization are considerations as important as machine type. The use of multimodal planning imaging is compulsory to achieve expected contouring quality. Treatment efficacy is difficult to assess following liver stereotactic radiotherapy, but local control is high and toxicity unusual. As a consequence, liver stereotactic radiotherapy is part of multimodal and multidisciplinary management of liver tumors.

Dose to organ at risk and dose prescription in liver SBRT

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is delivered in a curative intent to many primary and secondary tumors. Concerning liver metastasis, SBRT can be safely delivered using one to five fractions. An excellent local control is obtained with doses from 20 to 60 Gy. For primary hepatic tumors, results are also good, but the risk of hepatic toxicity related to liver pre-existent pathology must be taken into account. Radiation induced liver disease (RILD) is not frequent in its classical presentation, but modifications of liver enzymes are often observed. Other toxicities of SBRT on the duodenum, small bowel and biliary tract are also described. With respect to contraindications and dose limitations on surrounding structures, SBRT is well tolerated and takes place among curative treatment of liver tumors, as surgery, radiofrequency and embolization.

SBRT planning for liver metastases: A focus on immobilization, motion management and planning imaging techniques

AIM

To evaluate the different techniques used for liver metastases Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) planning. We especially focused on immobilization devices, motion management and imaging used for contouring.

BACKGROUND

Although some guidelines exist, there is no consensus regarding the minimal requirements for liver SBRT treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the main liver metastases SBRT publications and guidelines; and compared the techniques used for immobilization, motion management, margins and imaging.

RESULTS

There is a wide variety of techniques used for immobilization, motion management and planning imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a subjective critical analysis of minimal requirements and ideal technique for liver SBRT planning.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastasis - The linac-based Greater Poland Cancer Centre practice

AIM

The main purpose of this work is to give a technical description and present the properties of the liver SBRT protocol implemented in the Greater Poland Cancer Centre (GPCC) in Poznan, Poland.

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver metastasis is a non-invasive therapeutic option which enables irradiation of a small target in the body with a high dose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study presents details of our linac-based liver SBRT protocol. Special emphasis has been placed on fiducial implantation, patient preparation (CT scanning, immobilization), treatment planning, and its implementation.

RESULTS

The liver SBRT treatment course implemented in the GPCC consists of three fractions to deliver a total of 45 Gy. Fraction delivery details with description of patient positioning (localization of liver metastasis) are presented below.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature validation of the assumptions concerning the steps of the GPCC linac-based liver SBRT procedure show their potential for an effective and patient friendly implementation.

Radiobiological parameters of liver and lung metastases derived from tumor control data of 3719 metastases

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The radiobiological parameters for liver and lung metastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are poorly defined. This project aimed at estimating these parameters from published tumor control probability (TCP) data, and separately for metastases with colorectal cancer (CRC) and non-CRC histology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 62 studies with 89 different treatment prescriptions for a total of 3719 metastases were analyzed in a Bayesian framework using four different radiobiological models: The LQ, mLQ, LQ-L and the regrowth model which accounts for tumor regrowth after SBRT.

RESULTS

Depending on the particular model, α/β ratios in the range 13-23Gy for pulmonary metastases and 16-28Gy for hepatic metastases were estimated. For CRC metastases the estimated α/β ratio was 43.1±4.7Gy compared to 21.6±7.8Gy for non-CRC metastases. Typical isocenter dose prescriptions of 3×12Gy, 3×14.5Gy and 3×17Gy applied within 5days were predicted sufficient to control 90% of lung, liver and CRC metastases after 1yr, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

α/β ratios for liver and lung metastases are higher than the usually assumed 10Gy. Differences between CRC and non-CRC histology were found. Future studies confirming these findings in individual patient data are needed.

4D dose simulation in volumetric arc therapy: Accuracy and affecting parameters

Radiotherapy of lung and liver lesions has changed from normofractioned 3D-CRT to stereotactic treatment in a single or few fractions, often employing volumetric arc therapy (VMAT)-based techniques. Potential unintended interference of respiratory target motion and dynamically changing beam parameters during VMAT dose delivery motivates establishing 4D quality assurance (4D QA) procedures to assess appropriateness of generated VMAT treatment plans when taking into account patient-specific motion characteristics. Current approaches are motion phantom-based 4D QA and image-based 4D VMAT dose simulation. Whereas phantom-based 4D QA is usually restricted to a small number of measurements, the computational approaches allow simulating many motion scenarios. However, 4D VMAT dose simulation depends on various input parameters, influencing estimated doses along with mitigating simulation reliability. Thus, aiming at routine use of simulation-based 4D VMAT QA, the impact of such parameters as well as the overall accuracy of the 4D VMAT dose simulation has to be studied in detail–which is the topic of the present work. In detail, we introduce the principles of 4D VMAT dose simulation, identify influencing parameters and assess their impact on 4D dose simulation accuracy by comparison of simulated motion-affected dose distributions to corresponding dosimetric motion phantom measurements. Exploiting an ITV-based treatment planning approach, VMAT treatment plans were generated for a motion phantom and different motion scenarios (sinusoidal motion of different period/direction; regular/irregular motion). 4D VMAT dose simulation results and dose measurements were compared by local 3% / 3 mm γ-evaluation, with the measured dose distributions serving as ground truth. Overall γ-passing rates of simulations and dynamic measurements ranged from 97% to 100% (mean across all motion scenarios: 98% ± 1%); corresponding values for comparison of different day repeat measurements were between 98% and 100%. Parameters of major influence on 4D VMAT dose simulation accuracy were the degree of temporal discretization of the dose delivery process (the higher, the better) and correct alignment of the assumed breathing phases at the beginning of the dose measurements and simulations. Given the high γ-passing rates between simulated motion-affected doses and dynamic measurements, we consider the simulations to provide a reliable basis for assessment of VMAT motion effects that–in the sense of 4D QA of VMAT treatment plans–allows to verify target coverage in hypofractioned VMAT-based radiotherapy of moving targets. Remaining differences between measurements and simulations motivate, however, further detailed studies.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Liver Metastases

Many cancers can spread to the liver, often as the sole site of metastatic disease. For properly selected patients with limited hepatic disease and good performance status, an aggressive strategy involving radical local therapy to the site(s) of metastasis offers a chance for extended disease-free survivorship. The development of stereotactic body radiotherapy has inserted radiation therapy into the arsenal of valuable treatment options in this clinical setting. This article summarizes the latest advancements in the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy to treat liver metastases.

Treatment Options in Oligometastatic Disease: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy - Focus on Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Improvements in systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) have markedly extended survival, rendering local control of metastases to critical organs of increasing importance, especially in the oligometastatic setting where the disease may not yet have acquired the ability to widely disseminate. While surgical resection remains the gold standard for oligometastases in many organs, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) presents a non-invasive alternative for achieving local control.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify and summarize the findings of key prospective and retrospective studies that have shaped the field of SBRT for oligometastases to the lung, liver, and spine with a focus on oligometastases from CRC in particular.

RESULTS

Modern dose-escalated SBRT regimens can achieve 1-year local control rates of 77-100%, 90-100%, and 81-95% for oligometastases involving the lung, liver, and spine, respectively. Rates of grade 3 or greater toxicity with contemporary SBRT techniques are consistently low at <10% in the lung, <5% in the liver, and <2%/8% for neurologic/non-neurologic toxicity in the spine, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SBRT appears safe and effective for treating oligometastases involving the lung, liver, and spine. Randomized trials comparing SBRT to surgical resection and other local therapeutic modalities for the treatment of CRC oligometastases bear consideration.

The expanding role of stereotactic body radiation therapy in oligometastatic solid tumors: What do we know and where are we going?

The spectrum hypothesis posits that there are distinct clinical states of metastatic progression. Early data suggest that aggressive treatment of more biologically indolent metastatic disease, characterized by metastases limited in number and destination organ, may offer an opportunity to alter the disease course, potentially allowing for longer survival, delay of systemic therapy, or even cure. The development of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has opened new avenues for the treatment of oligometastatic disease. Early data support the use of SBRT for treating oligometastases in a number of organs, with promising rates of treated metastasis control and overall survival. Ongoing investigation is required to definitively establish benefit, determine the appropriate treatment regimen, refine patient selection, and incorporate SBRT with systemic therapies.

Image guided SBRT for multiple liver metastases with ExacTrac® Adaptive Gating

AIM

To report the outcome and toxicity of sequential stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for multiple liver metastases in patients treated with ExacTrac Adaptive Gating.

BACKGROUND

In selected patients with a limited number of liver metastases, SBRT has been evaluated as a safe and effective treatment, with minimal toxicity and high rates of local control.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 2008 to October 2013, 21 patients with multiple (3-14) liver metastases (n = 101) were treated sequentially with SBRT at our institution. Maximum tumor diameter was 7.5 cm. Prior to treatment, internal markers were placed inside or near the tumor. CT or PET-CT simulation was used for the definition of gross tumor volume (GTV). Median planning target volume was 32.3 cc (3.6-139.3 cc). Treatment consisted of 3 fractions (12-20 Gy/fraction) or 5 fractions (10 Gy/fraction), prescribed to the 90-95% of the PTV volume. Daily intra-fraction image guidance was performed with ExacTrac Adaptive Gating. Regular follow-up included CT or PET-CT imaging.

RESULTS

After a median of 23.2 months, the estimated local control rate was 94.4%, 80.6%, 65% and 65% after 1, 2, 3 and 4 years; the median overall survival was 62 months (95% CI 49.12-74.87) and the actuarial survival reached at 60 months was 57.6%. The univariate data analysis revealed that only primary histology other than colorectal adenocarcinoma was shown as an independent significant prognostic factor for local control (p = 0.022). Number of treated metastases did not modify significantly the overall survival (p = 0.51). No toxicity higher than G3 (1 patient with chest wall pain) and no radiation-induced liver disease were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential SBRT with ExacTrac Adaptive Gating for multiple liver metastases can be considered an effective, safe therapeutic option, with a low treatment-related toxicity. Excellent rates of local control and survival were obtained.

Application of stereotactic body radiation therapy to cancer liver metastasis

As an accurate external beam irradiation method, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been increasingly used to deliver high dose in less fractions. The liver is one of the most common organs for cancer metastasis. Recently, there have been several trials applying SBRT to cancer liver metastasis and have proved to be effective and safe with local control (LC) rates ranging from 70% to 100% within one or two years and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates ranging from 30% to 38%. Many published studies indicate that SBRT for cancer liver metastasis results in good outcomes without severe toxicities. However, the validated contribution of SBRT to an improved progression-free survival is still missing and more randomized trials should be conducted.