1
|
Zwarthoed C, Jaraudias C, Evesque L, Baron D, François E, Chardin D, Marie L, Mitrea D, Château Y, Gal J, Bailleux C. Prognostic Values of Pre- and Post-Therapeutic FDG-PET in Anal Canal Cancer: Analysis of a Prospective Study. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2025; 24:256-263.e8. [PMID: 39988512 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2025.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 01/19/2025] [Accepted: 01/31/2025] [Indexed: 02/25/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this post hoc study was to assess the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT quantitative parameters recorded before and after treatment for anal canal neoplasm for the disease free survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive, previously untreated patients with histologically proved anal cancer, with 18F-FDG PET/CT pre- and 2 months post treatment were included. The following criteria were analyzed: baseline primary tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), standardized tumor volume (SUV) max and mean, SUV normalized by lean body mass (SUL) max, mean and peak, variations between pre- and post-treatment examinations for SUVmax (Delta SUVmax), TLG (Delta TLG), MTV (Delta MTV), as well as post-treatment SULpeak and SUVmax for the primary tumor, and baseline sum of lesions TLG and MTV. RESULTS About 78 consecutive patients were included in this study. Median follow-up was 49 months. Baseline TLG, SUVmax, SULpeak, SULmax, sum of lesions for TLG and MTV, Delta SUVmax, and post-therapeutic SULpeak and SUVmax for the primary tumor, were statistically significant for disease free survival. CONCLUSION Pretherapeutic 18F-FDG PET/CT has a statistically significant prognostic value. The wide variability of results published in literature compels us to specifically explore the interest of uptake variations between pre- and post-treatment examinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Zwarthoed
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - C Jaraudias
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
| | - L Evesque
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - D Baron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - E François
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - D Chardin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - L Marie
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - D Mitrea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Y Château
- Department of Medical Statistic, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - J Gal
- Department of Medical Statistic, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - C Bailleux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pennock M, Brodin NP, Velten C, Gjini M, Ohri N, Guha C, Kalnicki S, Tome WA, Garg MK, Kabarriti R. Pre-treatment tumour PET metrics and clinical outcomes of anal cancer in patients living with and without HIV. Acta Oncol 2025; 64:564-573. [PMID: 40275508 PMCID: PMC12041796 DOI: 10.2340/1651-226x.2025.40680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2025] [Indexed: 04/26/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE To investigate if pre-treatment tumour positron-emission tomography (PET) metrics' prognostic efficacy changes with HIV or viral load (VL) in anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT) for non-metastatic ASCC from 2005 to 2021 at one institution were retrospectively identified. Patient demographic and clinical data, including HIV status and pre-treatment VL, were tabulated. Pre-treatment PET metrics were calculated with semi-automatic gradient-based segmentation algorithms. Cox-proportional-hazard and Kaplan-Meier modelling were used to investigate tumour PET metrics and outcomes: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional control (LRC). RESULTS A total of 175 patients were included: 110 HIV-negative and 65 patients living with HIV (PLWH). Nineteen PLWH had detectable pre-treatment VL. Median follow-up was 58 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 28-99), with 28 locoregional failures and 31 deaths. Five-year LRC, PFS, and OS was 84%, 73%, and 86%, respectively. There was no significant difference in LRC, PFS, or OS between HIV-negative patients and PLWH. 156 patients had available pre-treatment PET scans. Metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis were significantly associated with LRC and PFS on multivariate Cox analysis for the entire cohort (p ≤ 0.02), and HIV-negative patients on Cox sub-group analysis (p ≤ 0.01). No association between PET metrics and outcomes was seen for PLWH. INTERPRETATION Outcomes were comparable between HIV-negative patients and PLWH. Pre-treatment PET metrics were validated as significantly predicting outcomes for the entire cohort and HIV-negative patients, not PLWH. This may be from small numbers of PLWH patients, or non-specific uptake in patients with uncontrolled HIV reducing PET's prognostic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Pennock
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - N Patrik Brodin
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Christian Velten
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Megi Gjini
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Nitin Ohri
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Chandan Guha
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Shalom Kalnicki
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Wolfgang A Tome
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Madhur K Garg
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Rafi Kabarriti
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kumar R, Shalaby A, Narra LR, Gokhale S, Deek MP, Jabbour SK. Updates in the Role of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Radiation Oncology in Gastrointestinal Malignancies. PET Clin 2025; 20:219-229. [PMID: 39952884 PMCID: PMC12037145 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2025.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2025]
Abstract
Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) plays a critical role in managing gastrointestinal (GI) cancers within radiation oncology. It enhances tumor detection, staging, and lymph node involvement assessment, leading to better-targeted radiation treatment. PET/CT also aids in delineating tumor volumes to minimize geographic misses, enabling precise dose escalation to metabolically active regions. Despite its benefits, PET/CT has limitations such as false positives and dependency on complementary imaging. Emerging technologies offer real-time adjustments and personalized treatments, advancing precision medicine in GI radiation oncology. Further research is needed to refine PET/CT integration for improved treatment outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritesh Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Ahmed Shalaby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Lakshmi Rekha Narra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Shivani Gokhale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Matthew P Deek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim K, Mercer J, John V, Mathew S, Kochhar R. Imaging Features of Anal Carcinoma after Chemoradiation. Radiographics 2025; 45:e240119. [PMID: 40080437 DOI: 10.1148/rg.240119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2025]
Abstract
Anal cancer is a rare malignancy that is primarily treated with chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Clinical examination of the anal canal after CRT is often limited owing to the patient's discomfort. Therefore, radiologic surveillance plays a fundamental role in treatment response assessment. Currently recommended imaging modalities for posttreatment follow-up include pelvic MRI for local response evaluation and CT for evaluation of possible distant metastases. Patients who demonstrate a complete treatment response undergo regular clinical and imaging surveillance. Cases demonstrating an equivocal treatment response, an incomplete response, or disease progression should be streamlined for biopsy confirmation of the suspicious site and considered for salvage abdominoperineal resection. Radiologic differentiation of post-CRT inflammatory changes versus residual tumor, particularly in the early post-CRT period, can be challenging. However, careful interrogation of T2-weighted MR images correlated with matching diffusion-weighted and apparent diffusion coefficient images can increase reader confidence. The role of fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in assessing the response to anal cancer treatment is a debated topic. However, emerging research suggests that FDG PET/CT is complementary to pelvic MRI for accurate treatment response assessment, providing additional metabolic information. In this article, the authors provide a comprehensive review of the post-CRT imaging appearances of anal cancer, including examples from the spectrum of disease responses and therapy-related complications, and describe the strengths and limitations of pelvic MRI and FDG PET/CT. The authors also share the pearls and pitfalls in differentiating residual tumor from posttreatment inflammatory mimics. ©RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyungmin Kim
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostics and Support, Christie Hospital, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 202 Palatine Rd, Manchester, United Kingdom, M20 2WG (K.K., J.M., V.J., S.M., R.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostics and Support, Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot, United Kingdom (K.K., V.J.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostics and Support, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, United Kingdom (S.M.)
| | - Joseph Mercer
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostics and Support, Christie Hospital, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 202 Palatine Rd, Manchester, United Kingdom, M20 2WG (K.K., J.M., V.J., S.M., R.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostics and Support, Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot, United Kingdom (K.K., V.J.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostics and Support, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, United Kingdom (S.M.)
| | - Victoria John
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostics and Support, Christie Hospital, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 202 Palatine Rd, Manchester, United Kingdom, M20 2WG (K.K., J.M., V.J., S.M., R.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostics and Support, Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot, United Kingdom (K.K., V.J.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostics and Support, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, United Kingdom (S.M.)
| | - Smitha Mathew
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostics and Support, Christie Hospital, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 202 Palatine Rd, Manchester, United Kingdom, M20 2WG (K.K., J.M., V.J., S.M., R.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostics and Support, Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot, United Kingdom (K.K., V.J.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostics and Support, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, United Kingdom (S.M.)
| | - Rohit Kochhar
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostics and Support, Christie Hospital, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 202 Palatine Rd, Manchester, United Kingdom, M20 2WG (K.K., J.M., V.J., S.M., R.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostics and Support, Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Prescot, United Kingdom (K.K., V.J.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Diagnostics and Support, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, United Kingdom (S.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aktan M, Kanyilmaz G, Yavuz BB, Koc M, Eryılmaz MA, Adli M. Prognostic value of pre-treatment 18F-FDG PET uptake for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2025; 130:4-12. [PMID: 29177728 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-017-0837-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the prognostic value of maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) from serial fluor-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-two patients with NPC who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT scan before radiotherapy with/without chemotherapy were reviewed retrospectively. Twenty-seven patients (52%) were applied 3-D conformal radiotherapy and 25 patients (48%) applied intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Fourteen (27%) patients were given neoadjuvant chemotherapy and forty-four (84.6%) patients were given concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 34 months (range 5.6-66.4 months). Forty-four (84.6%) patients were alive at last follow-up and eight (15.4%) had died. The best cut-off value of the SUVmax for the primary tumor site (SUVmax-PT) was 13 and 9 for the lymph nodes (SUVmax-LN). Patients with SUVmax-PT ≥ 13.0 and SUVmax-LN ≥ 9 had a significantly higher risk for the development of the distant metastases (p = 0.044 and p = 0.038). DFS was affected in patients with SUVmax-PT ≥ 13 (log rank χ 2 = 2.54, p = 0.017) and was significantly lower in patients with SUVmax-LN ≥ 9 for the lymph nodes (log rank χ 2 = 5.81, p = 0.013). OS was not affected by SUV levels. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model of DFS included age (≥ 40), SUVmax-LN (< 9), T stage (T1-2) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are significantly better prognosis for the DFS. CONCLUSION 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake before treatment, as determined by SUVmax, may be a valuable tool to evaluate prognosis in NPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meryem Aktan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, 42090, Konya, Turkey.
| | - Gul Kanyilmaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, 42090, Konya, Turkey
| | - Berrin Benli Yavuz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, 42090, Konya, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Koc
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, 42090, Konya, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Akif Eryılmaz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Adli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Combet-Curt V, Buchalet C, Le Malicot K, Lemanski C, Deshayes E, Bonichon-Lamichhane N, Lièvre A, Huguet F, Tlili G, Vendrely V. Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT Assessment After Radiotherapy of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus in Patients from the National Multicentric Cohort FFCD-ANABASE. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:1194-1201. [PMID: 38936973 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT qualitative assessment in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS), colostomy-free survival (CFS), and overall survival (OS) after radiation therapy (RT) of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). Secondary objectives were to evaluate the prognostic value of baseline and posttherapeutic quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in terms of RFS, CFS, and OS. Methods: We included all consecutive patients from the French multicentric cohort FFCD-ANABASE who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT at baseline and 4-6 mo after RT or chemoradiotherapy for a localized SCCA. Qualitative assessments separated patients with complete metabolic response (CMR) and non-CMR. Quantitative parameters were measured on baseline and posttreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT. RFS, CFS, and OS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations among qualitative assessments, quantitative parameters, and RFS, CFS, and OS were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression. Results: Among 1,015 patients treated between January 2015 and April 2020, 388 patients (300 women and 88 men) from 36 centers had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT at diagnosis and after treatment. The median age was 65 y (range, 32-90 y); 147 patients (37.9%) had an early-stage tumor and 241 patients (62.1%) had a locally advanced-stage tumor; 59 patients (15.2%) received RT, and 329 (84.8%) received chemoradiotherapy. The median follow-up was 35.5 mo (95% CI, 32.8-36.6 mo). Patients with CMR had better 3-y RFS, CFS, and OS, at 84.2% (95% CI, 77.8%-88.9%), 84.7% (95% CI, 77.2%-89.3%), and 88.6% (95% CI, 82.5%-92.7%), respectively, than did non-CMR patients, at 42.1% (95% CI, 33.4%-50.6%), 47.9% (95% CI, 38.1%-56.8%), and 63.5 (95% CI, 53.2%-72.1%), respectively (P < 0.0001). Quantitative parameters were available for 154 patients from 3 centers. The following parameters were statistically significantly associated with 3-y RFS: baseline SUVmax (primitive tumor [T]) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01-1.1; P = 0.018]), SUVpeak (T) (HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.02-1.15; P = 0.007]), MTV 41% (T) (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1-1.03; P = 0.023]), MTV 41% (lymph node [N]) (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03-1.1; P < 0.001]), MTV 41% (T + N) (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1-1.03; P = 0.005]), and posttreatment SUVmax (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.09-1.34; P < 0.001]). Conclusion: Treatment response assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT after RT for SCCA has a significant prognostic value.18F-FDG PET/CT could be useful for adapting follow-up, especially for patients with locally advanced-stage tumors. Quantitative parameters could permit identification of patients with a worse prognosis but should be evaluated in further trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Astrid Lièvre
- Hepatogastroenterology Department, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mirshahvalad SA, Mesci A, Murad V, Kohan A, Ortega C, Veit-Haibach P, Metser U. [ 18F]-FDG PET in anal canal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 51:258-277. [PMID: 37592085 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06393-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide comprehensive data on the diagnostic and prognostic value of [18F]-FDG PET (PET) in anal canal cancer patients. METHODS This study was designed following the PRISMA-DTA guidelines. For the meta-analysis, published original articles (until December 2022) that met the following criteria were included: Evaluated PET for locoregional and/or distant disease detection in patients with histopathology-proven anal canal cancer; Compared PET with a valid reference standard; Provided crude data to calculate meta-analytic estimates. Diagnostic measurements from subgroups were calculated in evaluating primary tumour detection, T stage, lymph node and distant metastases. Articles providing prognostic information on PET were also reported as a systematic review. For pooled meta-analytic calculations, the hierarchical method was used. The bivariate model was conducted to find the summary estimates. Analyses were performed using STATA 16. RESULTS After the screening, 28 studies were eligible to enter the meta-analytic calculations, and data from 15 were reported descriptively. For distinguishing T3/T4 from other T-stages, PET had pooled sensitivity and specificity of 91%(95%CI:72%-97%) and 96%(95%CI:88%-98%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting metastatic (regional and/or distant) disease were 100% (95%CI:82%-100%) and 95% (95%CI:90%-98%), respectively. For therapy response assessment, the sensitivity and specificity of PET were 96%(95%CI:78%-99%) and 86%(95%CI:75%-93%), respectively. Higher pre-treatment total metabolic tumour volume was predictive of poorer survival. Conversely, for those achieving complete metabolic response, the 2-year PFS was 94%(95%CI:91%-97%) versus 51%(95%CI:42%-59%) for others (p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION PET may be a useful tool for anal canal cancer therapy planning and provides valuable prognostic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Ali Mirshahvalad
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Aruz Mesci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Unit 504, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Vanessa Murad
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Andres Kohan
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Claudia Ortega
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Patrick Veit-Haibach
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Ur Metser
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Medical Imaging Toronto, 610 University Ave, Suite 3-920, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul St 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bailleux C, Zwarthoed C, Evesque L, Baron D, Scouarnec C, Benezery K, Chardin D, Jaraudias C, Chateau Y, Gal J, François E. Prognostic impact of post-treatment FDG PET/CT in anal canal cancer: A prospective study. Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109905. [PMID: 37678620 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The aim of our prospective study was to assess the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT performed two months post treatment for anal canal neoplasm. POPULATION AND METHODS Consecutive patients with histologically proved anal cancer, with 18F-FDG PET/CT pre and two months post treatment were included. Patients were not previously treated for this neoplasm and then received radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. Clinical and pathologic data were collected and for 18F-FDG PET/CT visual and quantitative analysis (standardized uptake value, metabolic volume) were performed; response was classified according to EORTC and PERCIST criteria. The results were assessed for disease free survival and local recurrence free survival using the log-Rank test RESULTS: From December 2014 to September 2019, 94 consecutive patients were screened and 78 were included in this study. Median follow-up was 51 months. Two months post treatment, 37 patients (47.4%) had a complete radiological response according to both EORTC and PERCIST criteria, 66 patients (84.6%) had a clinical complete response. For disease free survival, the prognostic value of complete response was statistically significant (p=0.02) with 18F-FDG PET/CT and with clinical examination (p<0.001). For local recurrence free survival, the prognostic value with 18F-FDG PET/CT was lower (p=0.04) than clinical examination (p < 0.007). CONCLUSION While clinical examination remains the gold standard for post treatment evaluation in anal cancer, 18F-FDG PET/CT has a statistically significant prognostic value. These two assessments could be combined to improve early evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Bailleux
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Colette Zwarthoed
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Nuclear Medicine, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Ludovic Evesque
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - David Baron
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Radiation Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Cyrielle Scouarnec
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Radiation Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Karen Benezery
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Radiation Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - David Chardin
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Nuclear Medicine, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Claire Jaraudias
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Yann Chateau
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Statistic, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Jocelyn Gal
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Statistic, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France
| | - Eric François
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Department of Medical Oncology, 33 avenue de Valombrose 06189 Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mac Curtain BM, Qian W, Bell J, O'Mahony A, Temperly HC, Ng ZQ. Pre- and post-treatment FDG PET-CT as a predictor of patient outcomes in anal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:634-646. [PMID: 37573606 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) has a generally acceptable outlook in terms of survival. 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computer tomography (FDG PET-CT) is not recommended for routine monitoring post-ASCC treatment. We examine herein if FDG PET-CT has a use in the prognostic evaluation of patients with ASCC, what FDG PET-CT metrics are of value and if a pre- or post-chemo/radiotherapy scan is more prognostic of outcomes. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials were comprehensively searched until 3 May, 2023. A modified Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess for study bias. We present our systematic review alongside pooled hazard ratios (HR) for maximum standardised uptake values (SUV) as a predictor of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Seven studies including 523 patients were included in our systematic review. Current evidence suggests that SUV maximum and median, metabolic tumour volume, total lesion glycolysis and complete and partial metabolic response may be prognostic when considering overall or progression-free survival (OS)/(PFS) along with local recurrence (LR). Pooled HR from two included studies indicate SUV max is prognostic of OS, HR 1.179, CI (1.039-1.338), P = 0.011 and PFS 1.176, CI (1.076-1.285), P < 0.01. FDG PET-CT may have a role to play in the prognostic evaluation of ASCC patients. Current evidence suggests post-treatment scanning may hold superior prognostic value at this time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin M Mac Curtain
- Department of Surgery, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Wanyang Qian
- Department of Surgery, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jack Bell
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aaron O'Mahony
- Department of Surgery, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Hugo C Temperly
- Department of Surgery, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Zi Qin Ng
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Adusumilli P, Elsayed N, Theophanous S, Samuel R, Cooper R, Casanova N, Tolan DJ, Gilbert A, Scarsbrook AF. Combined PET-CT and MRI for response evaluation in patients with squamous cell anal carcinoma treated with curative-intent chemoradiotherapy. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:5086-5096. [PMID: 35274187 PMCID: PMC8913212 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08648-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for response assessment post curative-intent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). METHODS Consecutive ASCC patients treated with curative-intent CRT at a single centre between January 2018 and April 2020 were retrospectively identified. Clinical meta-data including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were collated. Three radiologists evaluated PET-CT and MRI using qualitative response assessment criteria and agreed in consensus. Two-proportion z test was used to compare diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy). Kaplan-Meier analysis (Mantel-Cox log-rank) was performed. RESULTS MRI (accuracy 76%, PPV 44.8%, NPV 95.7%) and PET-CT (accuracy 69.3%, PPV 36.7%, NPV 91.1%) performance metrics were similar; when combined, there were statistically significant improvements (accuracy 94.7%, PPV 78.9%, NPV 100%). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significant differences in PFS between responders and non-responders at PET-CT (p = 0.007), MRI (p = 0.005), and consensus evaluation (p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis of PFS demonstrated a lower hazard ratio (HR) and narrower 95% confidence intervals for consensus findings (HR = 0.093, p < 0.001). Seventy-five patients, of which 52 (69.3%) were females, with median follow-up of 17.8 months (range 5-32.6) were included. Fifteen of the 75 (20%) had persistent anorectal and/or nodal disease after CRT. Three patients died, median time to death 6.2 months (range 5-18.3). CONCLUSION Combined PET-CT and MRI response assessment post-CRT better predicts subsequent outcome than either modality alone. This could have valuable clinical benefits by guiding personalised risk-adapted patient follow-up. KEY POINTS • MRI and PET-CT performance metrics for assessing response following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) were similar. • Combined MRI and PET-CT treatment response assessment 3 months after CRT in patients with ASCC was demonstrated to be superior to either modality alone. • A combined MRI and PET-CT assessment 3 months after CRT in patients with ASCC has the potential to improve accuracy and guide optimal patient management with a greater ability to predict outcome than either modality alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratik Adusumilli
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Noha Elsayed
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Stelios Theophanous
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robert Samuel
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Rachel Cooper
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Nathalie Casanova
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Damien J. Tolan
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Alexandra Gilbert
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew F. Scarsbrook
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St James’s University Hospital, Level 1, Bexley Wing, Beckett Street, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS9 7TF UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jayaprakasam VS, Paroder V, Schöder H. Variants and Pitfalls in PET/CT Imaging of Gastrointestinal Cancers. Semin Nucl Med 2021; 51:485-501. [PMID: 33965198 PMCID: PMC8338802 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
In the past two decades, PET/CT has become an essential modality in oncology increasingly used in the management of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Most PET/CT tracers used in clinical practice show some degree of GI uptake. This uptake is quite variable and knowledge of common patterns of biodistribution of various radiotracers is helpful in clinical practice. 18F-Fluoro-Deoxy-Glucose (FDG) is the most commonly used radiotracer and has quite a variable uptake within the bowel. 68Ga-Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) shows intense uptake within the proximal small bowel loops. 11C-methyl-L-methionine (MET) shows high accumulation within the bowels, which makes it difficult to assess bowel or pelvic diseases. One must also be aware of technical artifacts causing difficulties in interpretations, such as high attenuation oral contrast material within the bowel lumen or misregistration artifact due to patient movements. It is imperative to know the common variants and benign diseases that can mimic malignant pathologies. Intense FDG uptake within the esophagus and stomach may be a normal variant or may be associated with benign conditions such as esophagitis, reflux disease, or gastritis. Metformin can cause diffuse intense uptake throughout the bowel loops. Intense physiologic uptake can also be seen within the anal canal. Segmental bowel uptake can be seen in inflammatory bowel disease, radiation, or medication induced enteritis/colitis or infection. Diagnosis of appendicitis or diverticular disease requires CT correlation, as normal appendix or diverticulum can show intense uptake. Certain malignant pathologies are known to have only low FDG uptake, such as early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, mucinous tumors, indolent lymphomas, and multicystic mesotheliomas. Response assessment, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, can be limited by post-treatment inflammatory changes. Post-operative complications such as abscess or fistula formation can also show intense uptake and may obscure underlying malignant pathology. In the absence of clinical suspicion or rising tumor marker, the role of FDG PET/CT in routine surveillance of patients with GI malignancy is not clear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- Body Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sud S, Weiner AA, Wang AZ, Gupta GP, Shen CJ. Prognostic and Predictive Clinical and Biological Factors in HPV Malignancies. Semin Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:309-323. [PMID: 34455986 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes the majority of oropharyngeal, cervical, and anal cancers, among others. These HPV-associated cancers cause substantial morbidity and mortality despite ongoing vaccination efforts. Aside from the earliest stage tumors, chemoradiation is used to treat most HPV-associated cancers across disease sites. Response rates are variable, and opportunities to improve oncologic control and reduce toxicity remain. HPV malignancies share multiple commonalities in oncogenesis and tumor biology that may inform personalized methods of screening, diagnosis, treatment and surveillance. In this review we discuss the current literature and identify promising molecular targets, prognostic and predictive clinical factors and biomarkers in HPV-associated oropharyngeal, cervical and anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani Sud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ashley A Weiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Andrew Z Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Gaorav P Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Colette J Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1-23. [PMID: 34259912 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01812-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60:326-343. [PMID: 34261141 DOI: 10.1055/a-1525-7029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Susko MS, Lazar AA, Wang CCJ, Van Loon K, Feng M, Hope TA, Behr S, Anwar M. Use of advanced PET-volume metrics predicts risk of local recurrence and overall survival in anal cancer. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0246535. [PMID: 33539412 PMCID: PMC7861457 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Anal cancer is an uncommon malignancy with the primary treatment for localized disease being concurrent radiation and chemotherapy. Pre-treatment PET/CT is useful for target delineation, with minimal exploration of its use in prognostication. In the post-treatment setting there is growing evidence for advanced PET metrics in assessment of treatment response, and early identification of recurrence essential for successful salvage, however this data is limited to small series. Methods Patient with non-metastatic anal cancer from a single institution were retrospectively reviewed for receipt of pre- and post-treatment PET/CTs. PET data was co-registered with radiation therapy planning CT scans for precise longitudinal assessment of advanced PET metrics including SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), for assessment with treatment outcomes. Treatment outcomes included local recurrence (LR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), as defined from the completed radiation therapy to the time of the event. Cox proportional hazard modeling with inverse probability weighting (IPW) using the propensity score based on age, BMI, T-stage, and radiation therapy dose were utilized for assessment of these metrics. Results From 2008 to 2017 there were 72 patients who had pre-treatment PET/CT, 61 (85%) had a single follow up PET/CT, and 35 (49%) had two follow up PET/CTs. The median clinical follow-up time was 25 months (IQR: 13–52) with a median imaging follow up time of 16 months (IQR: 7–29). On pre-treatment PET/CT higher MTV2.5 and TLG were significantly associated with higher risk of local recurrence (HR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.06–1.16, p<0.001; and HR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05–1.19, p<0.001), and worse PFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04–1.13, p<0.001; and HR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03–1.12, p = 0.003) and OS (HR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04–1.16, p = 0.001; and HR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04–1.20, p = 0.004). IPW-adjusted pre-treatment PET/CT showed higher MTV2.5 (HR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02–1.17, p = 0.012) and TLG (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00–1.20, p = 0.048) were significantly associated with worse PFS, and post-treatment MTV2.5 was borderline significant (HR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.00–1.35, p = 0.052). Conclusion Advanced PET metrics, including higher MTV2.5 and TLG, in the pre-treatment and post-treatment setting are significantly associated with elevated rates of local recurrence, and worse PFS and OS. This adds to the growing body of literature that PET/CT for patient with ASCC should be considered for prognostication, and additionally is a useful tool for consideration of early salvage or clinical trial of adjuvant therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew S. Susko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Ann A. Lazar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Chia-Ching Jackie Wang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital–Medical Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Katherine Van Loon
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Mary Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Tom A. Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Spencer Behr
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Mekhail Anwar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Simoni N, Rossi G, Benetti G, Zuffante M, Micera R, Pavarana M, Guariglia S, Zivelonghi E, Mengardo V, Weindelmayer J, Giacopuzzi S, de Manzoni G, Cavedon C, Mazzarotto R. 18F-FDG PET/CT Metrics Are Correlated to the Pathological Response in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated With Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Neoadjuvant Chemo-Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2020; 10:599907. [PMID: 33330097 PMCID: PMC7729075 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.599907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective The aim of this study was to assess the ability of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) to provide functional information useful in predicting pathological response to an intensive neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT) protocol for both esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) patients. Material and Methods Esophageal carcinoma (EC) patients, treated in our Center between 2014 and 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. The nCRT protocol schedule consisted of an induction phase of weekly administered docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TCF) for 3 weeks, followed by a concomitant phase of weekly TCF for 5 weeks with concurrent radiotherapy (50–50.4 Gy in 25–28 fractions). Three 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed: before (PET1) and after (PET2) induction chemotherapy (IC), and prior to surgery (PET3). Correlation between PET parameters [maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVmean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)], radiomic features and tumor regression grade (TGR) was investigated. Results Fifty-four patients (35 ADC, 19 SCC; 48 cT3/4; 52 cN+) were eligible for the analysis. Pathological response to nCRT was classified as major (TRG1-2, 41/54, 75.9%) or non-response (TRG3-4, 13/54, 24.1%). A major response was statistically correlated with SCC subtype (p = 0.02) and smaller tumor length (p = 0.03). MTV and TLG measured prior to IC (PET1) were correlated to TRG1-2 response (p = 0.02 and p = 0.02, respectively). After IC (PET2), SUVmean and TLG correlated with major response (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). No significance was detected when relative changes of metabolic parameters between PET1 and PET2 were evaluated. At textural quantitative analysis, three independent radiomic features extracted from PET1 images ([JointEnergy and InverseDifferenceNormalized of GLCM and LowGrayLevelZoneEmphasis of GLSZM) were statistically correlated with major response (p < 0.0002). Conclusions 18F-FDG PET/CT traditional metrics and textural features seem to predict pathologic response (TRG) in EC patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Further investigations are necessary in order to obtain a reliable predictive model to be used in the clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Simoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Gabriella Rossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulio Benetti
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Zuffante
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Renato Micera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Pavarana
- Department of Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefania Guariglia
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Zivelonghi
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Valentina Mengardo
- Department of General and Upper G.I. Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Jacopo Weindelmayer
- Department of General and Upper G.I. Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Simone Giacopuzzi
- Department of General and Upper G.I. Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni de Manzoni
- Department of General and Upper G.I. Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Carlo Cavedon
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Renzo Mazzarotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Additional Value of 2-[ 18F]FDG PET/CT Comparing to MRI in Treatment Approach of Anal Cancer Patients. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9092715. [PMID: 32842617 PMCID: PMC7563850 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate staging and treatment planning are imperative for precise management in Anal Cancer (ACa) patients. We aimed to evaluate the additive and prognostic value of pre-treatment 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (2-[18F]FDG PET/CT) in the staging and management of ACa compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This retrospective study was conducted on 54 patients. Pre-treatment 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT studies and MRI reports were compared considering the primary tumor, pelvic lymph nodes, and metastatic lesions. The impact of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in the management and its prognostic value, using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), were assessed. Discordant findings were found in 46.3% of patients (5 in T; 1 in T and N; 18 in N; and 1 in M stage). 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT resulted in up-staging in 9.26% and down-staging in 3.7% of patients. Perirectal lymph nodes were metabolically inactive in 12.9% of patients. Moreover, 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT resulted in management change in 24.1% of patients. Finally, SUVmax provided no prognostic value. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT altered staging and management in a sizable number of patients in this study, and supports a need for a change in guidelines for it to be used as a routine complementary test in the initial management of ACa.
Collapse
|
18
|
Lee GC, Ricciardi R, Stafford C, Hong TS, Francone TD, Bordeianou LG, Kunitake H. Association of Time Between Radiation and Salvage APR and Margin Status in Patients With Anal Cancer Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiation. Am Surg 2020; 86:703-714. [PMID: 32683973 DOI: 10.1177/0003134820923326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
There is a controversy regarding the optimal time to assess anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) response to chemoradiation and when salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) should be offered. A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with stage I-III anal SCC treated with chemoradiation in the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). The time between radiation and APR was recorded. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to determine predictors of resection margin status and overall survival. The cohort included 23 050 patients, of whom 545 (2.4%) underwent salvage APR. The median (IQR) time between radiation and resection was 3.8 (2.4-5.5) months. The rate of positive margins was 19.0%. Positive margins were more common in male, non-white patients with larger tumors, pathologic upstaging of T stage, and ≥3 months between chemoradiation and resection (all P < .05). Observing for ≥3 months between chemoradiation and APR remained associated with positive margins, even after adjusting for pretreatment tumor size (odds ratio = 2.56, 95% CI 1.46-4.47). Our data, based on the largest published cohort of anal SCC patients treated with chemoradiation and subsequent APR, suggest that patients at high risk of local treatment failure, particularly non-white men with large tumors, may benefit from early interim restaging and earlier consideration of salvage surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace C Lee
- 2348 Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rocco Ricciardi
- 2348 Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Caitlin Stafford
- 2348 Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Theodore S Hong
- 2348 Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Todd D Francone
- 2348 Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Liliana G Bordeianou
- 2348 Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hiroko Kunitake
- 2348 Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Unterrainer M, Eze C, Ilhan H, Marschner S, Roengvoraphoj O, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Walter F, Kunz WG, Rosenschöld PMA, Jeraj R, Albert NL, Grosu AL, Niyazi M, Bartenstein P, Belka C. Recent advances of PET imaging in clinical radiation oncology. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:88. [PMID: 32317029 PMCID: PMC7171749 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01519-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy and radiation oncology play a key role in the clinical management of patients suffering from oncological diseases. In clinical routine, anatomic imaging such as contrast-enhanced CT and MRI are widely available and are usually used to improve the target volume delineation for subsequent radiotherapy. Moreover, these modalities are also used for treatment monitoring after radiotherapy. However, some diagnostic questions cannot be sufficiently addressed by the mere use standard morphological imaging. Therefore, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging gains increasing clinical significance in the management of oncological patients undergoing radiotherapy, as PET allows the visualization and quantification of tumoral features on a molecular level beyond the mere morphological extent shown by conventional imaging, such as tumor metabolism or receptor expression. The tumor metabolism or receptor expression information derived from PET can be used as tool for visualization of tumor extent, for assessing response during and after therapy, for prediction of patterns of failure and for definition of the volume in need of dose-escalation. This review focuses on recent and current advances of PET imaging within the field of clinical radiotherapy / radiation oncology in several oncological entities (neuro-oncology, head & neck cancer, lung cancer, gastrointestinal tumors and prostate cancer) with particular emphasis on radiotherapy planning, response assessment after radiotherapy and prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - C Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - H Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - S Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - O Roengvoraphoj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - N S Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - F Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - W G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - P Munck Af Rosenschöld
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - R Jeraj
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
| | - N L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Niyazi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Belka
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
The Utility of PET/Computed Tomography for Radiation Oncology Planning, Surveillance, and Prognosis Prediction of Gastrointestinal Tumors. PET Clin 2019; 15:77-87. [PMID: 31735304 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2019.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
At present, the strongest evidence for the use of PET/computed tomography (CT) in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies is to rule out distant metastatic disease at diagnosis, radiation treatment planning for anal malignancies, and disease recurrence monitoring in colorectal and anal malignancies. Use of PET/CT for GI malignancies continues to evolve over time, with new studies evaluating prognostic abilities of PET/CT and with increasing sensitivity and spatial resolution of more modern PET/CT scanners. The authors encourage future applications and prospective evaluation of the use of PET/CT in the staging, prognostication, and recurrence prediction for GI malignancies.
Collapse
|
21
|
Leccisotti L, Manfrida S, Barone R, Ripani D, Tagliaferri L, Masiello V, Privitera V, Gambacorta MA, Rufini V, Valentini V, Giordano A. The prognostic role of FDG PET/CT before combined radio-chemotherapy in anal cancer patients. Ann Nucl Med 2019; 34:65-73. [DOI: 10.1007/s12149-019-01416-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
22
|
Jones MP, Hruby G, Metser U, Sridharan S, Capp A, Kumar M, Gallagher S, Rutherford N, Holder C, Oldmeadow C, Martin J. FDG-PET parameters predict for recurrence in anal cancer - results from a prospective, multicentre clinical trial. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:140. [PMID: 31387597 PMCID: PMC6685144 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1342-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate the prognostic significance of positron emission tomography (PET) parameters from F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scans performed pre- and post- chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (AC). Methods From January 2013 to January 2017, 19 patients with non-metastatic AC enrolled on a prospective trial underwent FDG-PET/CT imaging before and 12 weeks following CRT. A computer-generated volume of interest (VOI) was snapped around the primary tumour using six different standard uptake value (SUV) thresholds and the following parameters were extracted: SUV max, mean, median, standard deviation and peak as well as metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis. Exact logistic regression and ROC AUC analyses were performed for each metric at each timepoint. Results With a median follow up of 15.8 months, 3/19 patients had a local recurrence and 5/19 had any recurrence. On post-CRT PET, the median SUV within a VOI bounded by an SUV of 3 correlated with local recurrence (p < 0.01) and demonstrated excellent discrimination (ROC AUC 1.00, perfect separation was achieved at a median SUV of 3.38). The mean SUV at this threshold did not quite reach significance for prediction of local recurrence (p = 0.06) but demonstrated excellent discrimination (ROC AUC 0.91). The MTV bounded by a threshold of 41% SUVmax on the pre-CRT PET predicted for any recurrence (p = 0.03) and showed excellent discrimination (ROC AUC 0.89). Conclusions FDG-PET parameters are predictive of recurrence in AC. FDG-PET may represent a valuable tool for prognostication and response assessment in AC. Trial registration ANZCTR, ACTRN12614001219673. Registered 19 November 2014 - Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Peter Jones
- WP Holman Clinic, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. .,The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - George Hruby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ur Metser
- Department of Medical Imaging, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Swetha Sridharan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anne Capp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mahesh Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Gallagher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natalie Rutherford
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carl Holder
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Jarad Martin
- The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fiorentino A, Laudicella R, Ciurlia E, Annunziata S, Lancellotta V, Mapelli P, Tuscano C, Caobelli F, Evangelista L, Marino L, Quartuccio N, Fiore M, Borghetti P, Chiaravalloti A, Ricci M, Desideri I, Alongi P. Positron emission tomography with computed tomography imaging (PET/CT) for the radiotherapy planning definition of the biological target volume: PART 2. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 139:117-124. [PMID: 30940428 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM Positron Emission Tomography with Computed Tomography (PET/CT) has been proven to be useful in the definition of Radiotherapy (RT) target volume. In this regard, the present expert review summarizes existing data for pancreas, prostate, gynecological and rectum/anal cancer. METHODS A comprehensive search of published original article was made, based on SCOPUS and PubMed database, selecting the paper that evaluated the role of PET/CT in the definition of RT volume. RESULTS FDG-PET has an important and promising role for pancreatic cancer. Choline PET/CT could be useful for identifying high-risk volumes for prostate cancer; while PSMA PET/CT is still under evaluation. FDG PET/CT in gynecological cancers has been shown to impact external-beam RT planning. The role of FDG-PET for Gross Tumor volume identification is crucial, representing a useful and powerful tool for anal and rectal cancer. CONCLUSION Taken together, molecular and functional imaging approaches offer a major step to individualize radiotherapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba Fiorentino
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti-Bari, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Laudicella
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Italy
| | - Elisa Ciurlia
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy
| | - Salvatore Annunziata
- Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS-Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Roma, Italy
| | - Paola Mapelli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmelo Tuscano
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Federico Caobelli
- Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Lorenza Marino
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, REM, Viagrande, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Michele Fiore
- Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Borghetti
- Radiation Oncology Department University and Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Agostino Chiaravalloti
- IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo (INM) Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy; Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy
| | - Maria Ricci
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Section of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Alongi
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Nuclear Medicine Service, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalu, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Duimering A, Riauka T, Nijjar Y, Ghosh S, MacEwan R, Warkentin H, Schiller D, Tankel K, Usmani N, Severin D, Nijjar T, Fairchild A, Mulder K, Doll C, Wong C, Joseph K. Prognostic utility of pre- and post-treatment FDG-PET parameters in anal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2019; 136:21-28. [PMID: 31015125 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Revised: 03/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE We prospectively assessed the contributions of PET to initial staging, early detection of treatment failures, and prognostication in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients with ASCC referred for radical chemoradiotherapy (CRT) consented to undergo FDG-PET imaging pre-treatment and at 3 and 6 months post-treatment. Clinicopathologic data were collected and CT and PET imaging reviewed for contribution to staging and recurrence detection. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), peak standardized uptake value (SUVpeak), metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were assessed for association with progression-free survival (PFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. RESULTS Between 2009 and 2016, 73 patients with clinical stages I-IIIB ASCC completed curative-intent CRT. Median follow-up was 48 months. 14 patients died and 18 patients experienced disease progression. 4-year PFS, CSS, and OS were 73%, 87%, and 84%, respectively. A pre-treatment MTV >35 cm3 predicted for worse PFS (p = 0.011) and CSS (p = 0.024) on univariate and multivariate analyses, employing an MTV definition of voxels ≥25% of SUVmax. Higher 6-month post-treatment SUVmax and SUVpeak predicted for worse PFS and OS (p ≤ 0.011). Pre-treatment SUVmax, SUVpeak, and TLG, and 3-month post-treatment SUVmax and SUVpeak did not significantly correlate with survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support that pre-treatment MTV provides meaningful prognostic information, with suggestion that an MTV delineation threshold of voxels ≥25% of SUVmax is appropriate in the anal region. Post treatment, the combination of clinical examination and PET effectively detected all treatment failures. Higher 6-month post-treatment SUVmax and SUVpeak predicted worse PFS and OS; however, the optimal timing of post-treatment PET imaging remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adele Duimering
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Terence Riauka
- Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Yugmel Nijjar
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Sunita Ghosh
- Divison of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Robert MacEwan
- Department of Oncologic Imaging, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Heather Warkentin
- Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Dan Schiller
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Keith Tankel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Nawaid Usmani
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Diane Severin
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Tirath Nijjar
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Alysa Fairchild
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Karen Mulder
- Divison of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Corinne Doll
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada
| | - Clarence Wong
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Kurian Joseph
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rusten E, Rekstad BL, Undseth C, Klotz D, Hernes E, Guren MG, Malinen E. Anal cancer chemoradiotherapy outcome prediction using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and clinicopathological factors. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20181006. [PMID: 30810343 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20181006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the role of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), obtained before and during chemoradiotherapy, in predicting locoregional failure relative to clinicopathological factors for patients with anal cancer. METHODS 93 patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy were included in a prospective observational study (NCT01937780). FDG-PET/CT was performed for all patients before treatment, and for a subgroup (n = 39) also 2 weeks into treatment. FDG-PET was evaluated with standardized uptake values (SUVmax/peak/mean), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and a proposed Z-normalized combination of MTV and SUVpeak (ZMP). The objective was to predict locoregional failure using FDG-PET, tumor and lymph node stage, gross tumor volume (GTV) and human papilloma virus (HPV) status in univariate and bivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS N3 lymph node stage, HPV negative tumor, GTV, MTV, TLG and ZMP were in univariate analysis significant predictors of locoregional failure (p < 0.01), while SUVmax/peak/mean were not (p > 0.2). In bivariate analysis HPV status was the most independent predictor in combinations with N3 stage, ZMP, TLG, and MTV (p < 0.02). The FDG-PET parameters at 2 weeks into radiotherapy decreased by 30-40 % of the initial values, but neither absolute nor relative decrease improved the prediction models. CONCLUSION Pre-treatment PET parameters are predictive of chemoradiotherapy outcome in anal cancer, although HPV negativity and N3 stage are the strongest single predictors. Predictions can be improved by combining HPV with PET parameters such as MTV, TLG or ZMP. PET 2 weeks into treatment does not provide added predictive value. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Pre-treatment PET parameters of anal cancer showed a predictive role independent of clinicopathological factors. Although the PET parameters show substantial reduction from pre- to mid-treatment, the changes were not predictive of chemoradiotherapy outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Espen Rusten
- 1 Department of Medical Physics, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway
| | | | | | - Dagmar Klotz
- 3 Department of Pathology, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway
| | - Eivor Hernes
- 4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway
| | - Marianne Grønlie Guren
- 2 Department of Oncology, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway.,5 K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital , Oslo , Norway
| | - Eirik Malinen
- 1 Department of Medical Physics, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway.,6 Department of Physics, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Valvo F, Ciurlia E, Avuzzi B, Doci R, Ducreux M, Roelofsen F, Roth A, Trama A, Wittekind C, Bosset JF. Cancer of the anal region. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 135:115-127. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2017] [Revised: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
27
|
Sabbagh A, Jacobs C, Cooke R, Chu KY, Ng SM, Strauss VY, Virdee PS, Hawkins MA, Aznar MC, Muirhead R. Is There a Role for an 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-derived Biological Boost in Squamous Cell Anal Cancer? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:72-80. [PMID: 30583927 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.11.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Revised: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To investigate the potential role for a biological boost in anal cancer by assessing whether subvolumes of high 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avidity, identified at outset, are spatially consistent during a course of chemoradiotherapy (CRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS FDG-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans from 21 patients enrolled into the ART study (NCT02145416) were retrospectively analysed. In total, 29 volumes including both primary tumours and involved nodes >2 cm were identified. FDG-PET scans were carried out before treatment and on day 8 or 9 of CRT. FDG subvolumes were created using a percentage of maximum FDG avidity at thresholds of 34%, 40%, 50%, on the pre-treatment scans, and 70% and 80% on the subsequent scans. Both FDG-PET scans were deformably registered to the planning computed tomography scan. The overlap fraction and the vector distance were calculated to assess spatial consistency. FDG subvolumes for further investigation had an overlap fraction >0.7, as this has been defined in previous publications as a 'good' correlation. RESULTS The median overlap fractions between the diagnostic FDG-PET subvolumes 34%, 40% and 50% of maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) and subsequent FDG-PET subvolumes of 70% of SUVmax were 0.97, 0.92 and 0.81. The median overlap fraction between the diagnostic FDG-PET subvolumes 34%, 40% and 50% and subsequent FDG-PET subvolumes of 80% were 1.00, 1.00 and 0.92. The median (range) vector distance values between diagnostic FDG-PET subvolumes 34%, 40% and 50% and subsequent FDG-PET subvolumes of 80% were 0.74 mm (0.19-2.94) 0.74 mm (0.19-3.39) and 0.71 mm (0.2-3.29), respectively. Twenty of 29 volumes (69.0%) achieved a threshold > 0.7 between the FDG 50% subvolume on the diagnostic scan and the FDG 80% subvolume on the subsequent scan. CONCLUSION FDG-avid subvolumes identified at baseline were spatially consistent during a course of CRT treatment. The subvolume of 50% of SUVmax on the pre-treatment scan could be considered as a potential target for dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sabbagh
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - C Jacobs
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R Cooke
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; CRUK MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - K-Y Chu
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK; CRUK MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S M Ng
- Oncology Clinical Trials Office, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - V Y Strauss
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - P S Virdee
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M A Hawkins
- CRUK MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M C Aznar
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - R Muirhead
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Prognostic Significance of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2018; 2018:9760492. [PMID: 30627062 PMCID: PMC6305045 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9760492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2018] [Revised: 11/04/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Prognostic significance of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) in anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has been evaluated in several studies; however, the results seem to be controversial and no consensus exists about its predictive capability. The current meta-analysis was carried out to comprehensively investigate the prognostic significance of 18F-FDG-PET parameters in patients with anal SCC. Methods A comprehensive literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases was performed to retrieve pertinent articles published until August 5th 2018, concerning the prognostic significance of 18F-FDG-PET in patients with anal SCC. No language restriction was used. Several prognostic factors were reported for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) including pretreatment maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), inguinal nodal uptake, and metabolic response to therapy. Results Eleven studies (741 patients) were included. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for the probability of PFS was 5.36 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 3.12–9.21, p < 0.001) for metabolic response to therapy and 1.98 (95% CI: 1.26–3.12, p=0.003) for SUVmax. The pooled HR for the probability of OS was 5.87 (3.02–11.39, p < 0.0001) for metabolic response to therapy. On the other hand, the study revealed that the pooled HRs of MTV and inguinal nodal uptake for PFS were 1.56 (95% CI: 0.96–2.53, p=0.072) and 1.79 (95% CI: 1–3.21, p=0.051), respectively. Conclusions Our findings propose that some 18F-FDG-PET parameters could serve as prognostic indicators in anal SCC, but further larger studies are needed in this setting.
Collapse
|
29
|
Hong JC, Cui Y, Patel BN, Rushing CN, Faught AM, Eng JS, Higgins K, Yin FF, Das S, Czito BG, Willett CG, Palta M. Association of Interim FDG-PET Imaging During Chemoradiation for Squamous Anal Canal Carcinoma With Recurrence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:1046-1051. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Revised: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
30
|
Positron emission tomography and computed tomographic (PET/CT) imaging for radiation therapy planning in anal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 126:6-12. [PMID: 29759568 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2017] [Revised: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
To improve the accuracy of chemoradiation therapy in anal cancer patients PET/CT is frequently used in the planning of radiation therapy. A systematic review was performed to assess impact on survival, quality of life, symptom score, change in target definition and treatment intention. Systematic literature searches were conducted in Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Ten cross-sectional studies were identified. No data were available on survival or quality of life. The summary estimate of the proportion of patients in which PET/CT had an impact on the target definition, was 23% (95% CI 16;33). The corresponding summary estimate of a change in treatment intent from curative to palliative was 3% (95% CI 2;6). Almost one in four patients had a change in target definition, which supports the use of PET/CT in radiation therapy planning, but the consequence regarding survival and quality of life is still uncertain.
Collapse
|
31
|
Martin D, Balermpas P, Winkelmann R, Rödel F, Rödel C, Fokas E. Anal squamous cell carcinoma - State of the art management and future perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 65:11-21. [PMID: 29494827 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Revised: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is associated with infection with high-risk strains of human papilloma virus (HPV) in 70-90% of cases and a rise in incidence has been observed in the last decades. Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C constitutes the standard treatment for localized disease, but about 30% of patients do not respond or relapse locally. Phase I/II trials testing targeted agents, such as epidermal-growth-factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, have failed to improve clinical outcome and resulted in increased toxicities. Modern imaging methods and biomarkers, also in the context of HPV status, should be further explored to improve patient stratification. In the present review, we will discuss the current clinical evidence and future perspectives in the management of ASCC. HPV-positive ASCC is more immunogenic with a higher density of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes that correlate with better response to CRT and more favorable prognosis compared to HPV-negative tumors. Immunotherapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors have brought new hope and promising results were recently demonstrated in metastatic ASCC. The addition of immunotherapies to CRT for localized disease is tested in early phase trials, and these results could have a profound impact on the way we treat ASCC in near future. Further research and novel approaches are expected to enhance our understanding of tumor biology and immunology, and improve patient stratification and treatment adaptation in the context of personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site: Frankfurt a. M., Germany
| | - Ria Winkelmann
- Senckenberg Institute for Pathology, University of Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Franz Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site: Frankfurt a. M., Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site: Frankfurt a. M., Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site: Frankfurt a. M., Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Soares PC, Abdelhay ES, Thuler LCS, Soares BM, Demachki S, Ferro GVR, Assumpção PP, Lamarão LM, Ribeiro Pinto LF, Burbano RMR. HPV positive, wild type TP53, and p16 overexpression correlate with the absence of residual tumors after chemoradiotherapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol 2018; 18:30. [PMID: 29466950 PMCID: PMC5822520 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-018-0758-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Anal residual tumors are consensually identified within six months of chemoradiotherapy and represent a persistent lesion that may have prognostic value for overall survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of HPV and HIV status, p16 expression level and TP53 mutations with the absence of residual tumors (local response) in Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the anal canal after chemoradiotherapy. Methods We performed a study on 78 patients with SCC of the anal canal who submitted to chemoradiotherapy and were followed for a six-month period to identify the absence or presence of residual tumors. HPV DNA was identified by polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing, HIV RNA was detected by TaqMan amplification, p16 expression was detected by western blotting, and the mutational analysis of TP53 was performed by direct sequencing; additionally, samples carrying mutations underwent fluorescent in sit hybridization. The evaluation of the tumor response to treatment was conducted six months after the conclusion of chemoradiotherapy. The following classifications were used to evaluate the outcomes: a) no response (presence of residual tumor) and b) complete response (absence of residual tumor). Results The significant variables associated with the absence of residual tumors were HPV positive, p16 overexpressed, wild-type TP53, female gender, and stages I and II. Only the presence of HPV was independently correlated with the clinical response; this variable increased the chances of a response within six months by 31-fold. Conclusions The presence of HPV in tumor cells was correlated with the absence of a residual tumor. This correlation is valuable and can direct future therapeutic approaches in the anal canal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo C Soares
- Hospital Ophir Loyola, Belém, Pará, 66060-281, Brazil. .,Universidade do Estado do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
| | | | | | - Bruno Moreira Soares
- Laboratório de Citogenética Humana, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Belém, Pará, Brazil
| | - Samia Demachki
- Núcleo de Pesquisas em Oncologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil
| | | | - Paulo P Assumpção
- Núcleo de Pesquisas em Oncologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil
| | | | | | - Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano
- Hospital Ophir Loyola, Belém, Pará, 66060-281, Brazil.,Laboratório de Citogenética Humana, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Belém, Pará, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pre-treatment magnetic resonance-based texture features as potential imaging biomarkers for predicting event free survival in anal cancer treated by chemoradiotherapy. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:2801-2811. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5284-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Revised: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
34
|
Mahmud A, Poon R, Jonker D. PET imaging in anal canal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20170370. [PMID: 28972796 PMCID: PMC6047643 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Revised: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to synthesize and summarize the evidence surrounding the clinical utility of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in patients with anal canal cancer. METHODS The literature was searched using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases. Studies comparing PET or PET/CT with conventional imaging in the staging, response evaluation and follow-up of anal canal cancer were deemed eligible for inclusion. RESULTS 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. For the detection of primary tumour in situ, the pooled sensitivity was 99% for PET or PET/CT and 67% for CT. For the detection of inguinal lymph nodes, PET/CT had an overall sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 76%. PET or PET/CT upstaged 5.1 to 37.5% of patients and downstaged 8.2 to 26.7% of patients. Treatment plans were modified in 12.5 to 59.3% of patients, which consisted mainly of radiotherapy dose or field changes. Complete response on PET or PET/CT is a good prognostic factor for overall and progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS PET/CT seems to add value to conventional imaging in the initial staging of patients with T2-4 disease but further high-quality research is required to validate this. There is insufficient evidence at this time to recommend a routine use of PET/CT in the assessment of treatment response or follow-up. Advances in knowledge: PET/CT appears to alter the disease stage and management in a meaningful number of patients to justify its use as part of staging investigations in locally advanced cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aamer Mahmud
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Queen’s University, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ONT, Canada
| | - Raymond Poon
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, Cancer Care Ontario, Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ONT, Canada
| | - Derek Jonker
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, General Campus, Ottawa, ONT, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hassanzadeh C, Rao YJ, Chundury A, Rowe J, Ponisio MR, Sharma A, Miller-Thomas M, Tsien CI, Ippolito JE. Multiparametric MRI and [ 18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Is a Potential Prognostic Imaging Biomarker in Recurrent Glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2017; 7:178. [PMID: 28868256 PMCID: PMC5563320 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 08/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/objectives Multiparametric advanced MR and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging may be important biomarkers for prognosis as well for distinguishing recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) from treatment-related changes. Methods/materials We retrospectively evaluated 30 patients treated with chemoradiation for GBM and underwent advanced MR and FDG-PET for confirmation of tumor progression. Multiparametric MRI and FDG-PET imaging metrics were evaluated for their association with 6-month overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) based on pathological, radiographic, and clinical criteria. Results 17 males and 13 females were treated between 2001 and 2014, and later underwent FDG-PET at suspected recurrence. Baseline FDG-PET and MRI imaging was obtained at a median of 7.5 months [interquartile range (IQR) 3.7–12.4] following completion of chemoradiation. Median follow-up after FDG-PET imaging was 10 months (IQR 7.2–13.0). Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis identified that lesions characterized by a ratio of the SUVmax to the normal contralateral brain (SUVmax/NB index) >1.5 and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of ≤1,400 × 10−6 mm2/s correlated with worse 6-month OS and PFS. We defined three patient groups that predicted the probability of tumor progression: SUVmax/NB index >1.5 and ADC ≤1,400 × 10−6 mm2/s defined high-risk patients (n = 7), SUVmax/NB index ≤1.5 and ADC >1,400 × 10−6 mm2/s defined low-risk patients (n = 11), and intermediate-risk (n = 12) defined the remainder of the patients. Median OS following the time of the FDG-PET scan for the low, intermediate, and high-risk groups were 23.5, 10.5, and 3.8 months (p < 0.01). Median PFS were 10.0, 4.4, and 1.9 months (p = 0.03). Rates of progression at 6-months in the low, intermediate, and high-risk groups were 36, 67, and 86% (p = 0.04). Conclusion Recurrent GBM in the molecular era is associated with highly variable outcomes. Multiparametric MR and FDG-PET biomarkers may provide a clinically relevant, non-invasive and cost-effective method of predicting prognosis and improving clinical decision making in the treatment of patients with suspected tumor recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Comron Hassanzadeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.,Department of Genetics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Yuan James Rao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Anupama Chundury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Jackson Rowe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Maria Rosana Ponisio
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Akash Sharma
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Michelle Miller-Thomas
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Christina I Tsien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Joseph E Ippolito
- Department of Genetics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.,Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cardenas ML, Spencer CR, Markovina S, DeWees TA, Mazur TR, Weiner AA, Parikh PJ, Olsen JR. Quantitative FDG-PET/CT predicts local recurrence and survival for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Adv Radiat Oncol 2017; 2:281-287. [PMID: 29114593 PMCID: PMC5605304 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2016] [Revised: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 04/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography-(PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging is used for staging and treatment planning of patients with anal cancer. Quantitative pre- and posttreatment metrics that are predictive of recurrence are unknown. We evaluated the association between pre- and posttreatment FDG-PET/CT parameters and outcomes for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). METHODS AND MATERIALS The records of 110 patients treated between 2003 and 2013 with definitive radiation therapy for SCCA were reviewed under an institutional review board-approved protocol. The median radiation therapy dose was 50.4 Gy (range, 35-60 Gy). Concurrent chemotherapy was administered for 109 of 110 patients and generally consisted of 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C (n = 94). All patients underwent pretreatment FDG-PET/CT and 101 of 110 underwent posttreatment FDG-PET/CT 3 months after completion of radiation therapy. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was analyzed, in addition to multiple patient and treatment factors, by univariate and multivariate Cox regression for correlation with local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The median follow-up was 28.6 months. LR occurred in 1 of 15 (6.7%), 5 of 47 (10.6%), and 6 of 48 (12.5%) patients with stage I, II, and III disease, respectively. On univariate analysis, a significant association was observed between reduced LR and posttreatment SUVmax <6.1 (P = .0095) and between increased OS and posttreatment SUVmax <6.1 (P = .0086). On multivariate analysis, a significant association was observed between reduced LR and posttreatment SUVmax <6.1 (P = .0013) and the use of intensity modulated radiation therapy (P < .001). A significant multivariate association was observed between increased OS and posttreatment SUVmax <6.1 (P = .0373) and the use of 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C chemotherapy (P = .001). CONCLUSION Posttreatment SUVmax <6.1 is associated with reduced LR and increased OS after chemoradiation therapy for SCCA independent of T and N stage on multivariate analysis. Greater follow-up is required to confirm this association with late patterns of failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L. Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Davis, California
| | - Christopher R. Spencer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Stephanie Markovina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Thomas R. Mazur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ashley A. Weiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Parag J. Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jeffrey R. Olsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Houard C, Pinaquy JB, Mesguich C, Henriques de Figueiredo B, Cazeau AL, Allard JB, Laharie H, Bordenave L, Fernandez P, Vendrely V. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Posttreatment Evaluation of Anal Carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2017; 58:1414-1420. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.185280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2016] [Accepted: 02/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|
38
|
Teagle AR, Gilbert DC, Jones JR, Burkill GJ, McKinna F, Dizdarevic S. Negative 18F-FDG-PET-CT may exclude residual or recurrent disease in anal cancer. Nucl Med Commun 2017; 37:1038-45. [PMID: 27341410 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The incidence of anal cancer is increasing in Western countries. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET-computed tomography (CT) is used in the assessment of anal cancer, but its routine use is not established. The aim of this study was to assess the value of F-FDG-PET-CT in staging and post-treatment assessment in anal cancer and to determine its impact on management. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of patients with anal cancer treated at the Sussex Cancer Centre who underwent PET-CT between November 2004 and September 2014. Information was retrieved from patient notes and the local cancer register, and verified by referring consultants in all cases. RESULTS A total of 75 PET-CT scans in 52 patients were identified, representing 38.5% of patients diagnosed with anal cancer during this period. There were 24 staging scans and 51 post-treatment scans. Management was altered following 45.8% of staging scans and 56.0% of all scans, mostly changing treatment type or radiotherapy volume. Out of 28 positive post-treatment scans, 71.4% were true positives, 7.1% were false positives and 21.4% showed nonspecific uptake. Of the 23 negative post-treatment scans, all remained disease free at clinical/radiological follow-up (median follow-up 25 months). The sensitivity and specificity of post-treatment PET-CT were 100 and 74%, respectively. Negative predictive and positive predictive values were 100 and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION Evidence is evolving for the use of PET-CT in anal cancer. Because of a high negative predictive value, our series shows that PET-CT can be used in the assessment of treatment response to exclude residual/recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra R Teagle
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rao YJ, Hassanzadeh C, Chundury A, Hui C, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, DeWees T, Mullen D, Powell MA, Mutch DG, Schwarz JK, Grigsby PW. Association of post-treatment positron emission tomography with locoregional control and survival after radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Radiother Oncol 2017; 122:445-451. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Revised: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 12/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
40
|
Glynne-Jones R, Sebag-Montefiore D, Meadows HM, Cunningham D, Begum R, Adab F, Benstead K, Harte RJ, Stewart J, Beare S, Hackshaw A, Kadalayil L. Best time to assess complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:347-356. [PMID: 28209296 PMCID: PMC5337624 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30071-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Revised: 11/08/2016] [Accepted: 11/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines for anal cancer recommend assessment of response at 6-12 weeks after starting treatment. Using data from the ACT II trial, we determined the optimum timepoint to assess clinical tumour response after chemoradiotherapy. METHODS The previously reported ACT II trial was a phase 3 randomised trial of patients of any age with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma of the anus without metastatic disease from 59 centres in the UK. We randomly assigned patients (by minimisation) to receive either intravenous mitomycin (one dose of 12 mg/m2 on day 1) or intravenous cisplatin (one dose of 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29), with intravenous fluorouracil (one dose of 1000 mg/m2 per day on days 1-4 and 29-32) and radiotherapy (50·4 Gy in 28 daily fractions); and also did a second randomisation after initial therapy to maintenance chemotherapy (fluorouracil and cisplatin) or no maintenance chemotherapy. The primary outcome was complete clinical response (the absence of primary and nodal tumour by clinical examination), in addition to overall survival and progression-free survival from time of randomisation. In this post-hoc analysis, we analysed complete clinical response at three timepoints: 11 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 1), 18 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 2), and 26 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 3) as well as the overall and progression-free survival estimates of patients with complete clinical response or without complete clinical response at each assessment. We analysed both the overall trial population and a subgroup of patients who had attended each of the three assessments by modified intention-to-treat. This study is registered at controlled-trials.com, ISRCTN 26715889. FINDINGS We enrolled 940 patients from June 4, 2001, until Dec 16, 2008. Complete clinical response was achieved in 492 (52%) of 940 patients at assessment 1 (11 weeks), 665 (71%) of patients at assessment 2 (18 weeks), and 730 (78%) of patients at assessment 3 (26 weeks). 691 patients attended all three assessments and in this subgroup, complete clinical response was reported in 441 (64%) patients at assessment 1, 556 (80%) at assessment 2, and 590 (85%) at assessments 3. 151 (72%) of the 209 patients who had not had a complete clinical response at assessment 1 had a complete clinical response by assessment 3. In the overall trial population of 940 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3 was 83% (95% CI 79-86), 84% (81-87), and 87% (84-89), respectively and was 72% (66-78), 59% (49-67), and 46% (37-55) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3, respectively. In the subgroup of 691 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3 was 85% (81-88), 86% (82-88), and 87% (84-90), respectively, and was 75% (68-80), 61% (50-70), and 48% (36-58) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3, respectively. Similarly, progression-free survival in both the overall trial population and the subgroup was longer in patients who had a complete clinical response, compared with patients who did not have a complete clinical response, at all three assessments. INTERPRETATION Many patients who do not have a complete clinical response when assessed at 11 weeks after commencing chemoradiotherapy do in fact respond by 26 weeks, and the earlier assessment could lead to some patients having unnecessary surgery. Our data suggests that the optimum time for assessment of complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus is 26 weeks from starting chemoradiotherapy. We suggest that guidelines should be revised to indicate that later assessment is acceptable. FUNDING Cancer Research UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Helen M Meadows
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Rubina Begum
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - Fawzi Adab
- North Staffordshire Royal Infirmary, Stoke, UK
| | | | | | | | - Sandy Beare
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - Latha Kadalayil
- Faculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Jones CM, Goh V, Sebag-Montefiore D, Gilbert DC. Biomarkers in anal cancer: from biological understanding to stratified treatment. Br J Cancer 2017; 116:156-162. [PMID: 27923035 PMCID: PMC5243987 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2016] [Revised: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 11/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinomas of the anus and anal canal represent a model of a cancer and perhaps the first where level 1 evidence supported primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in treating locoregional disease with curative intent. The majority of tumours are associated with infection with oncogenic subtypes of human papilloma virus and this plays a significant role in their sensitivity to treatment. However, not all tumours are cured with CRT and there remain opportunities to improve outcomes in terms of oncological control and also reducing late toxicities. Understanding the biology of ASCC promises to allow a more personalised approach to treatment, with the development and validation of a range of biomarkers and associated techniques that are the focus of this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M Jones
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
- Leeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Vicky Goh
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, UK
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - David Sebag-Montefiore
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
- Leeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Duncan C Gilbert
- Sussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sharma RA, Plummer R, Stock JK, Greenhalgh TA, Ataman O, Kelly S, Clay R, Adams RA, Baird RD, Billingham L, Brown SR, Buckland S, Bulbeck H, Chalmers AJ, Clack G, Cranston AN, Damstrup L, Ferraldeschi R, Forster MD, Golec J, Hagan RM, Hall E, Hanauske AR, Harrington KJ, Haswell T, Hawkins MA, Illidge T, Jones H, Kennedy AS, McDonald F, Melcher T, O'Connor JPB, Pollard JR, Saunders MP, Sebag-Montefiore D, Smitt M, Staffurth J, Stratford IJ, Wedge SR. Clinical development of new drug-radiotherapy combinations. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2016; 13:627-42. [PMID: 27245279 DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.79] [Citation(s) in RCA: 243] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
In countries with the best cancer outcomes, approximately 60% of patients receive radiotherapy as part of their treatment, which is one of the most cost-effective cancer treatments. Notably, around 40% of cancer cures include the use of radiotherapy, either as a single modality or combined with other treatments. Radiotherapy can provide enormous benefit to patients with cancer. In the past decade, significant technical advances, such as image-guided radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and proton therapy enable higher doses of radiotherapy to be delivered to the tumour with significantly lower doses to normal surrounding tissues. However, apart from the combination of traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy with radiotherapy, little progress has been made in identifying and defining optimal targeted therapy and radiotherapy combinations to improve the efficacy of cancer treatment. The National Cancer Research Institute Clinical and Translational Radiotherapy Research Working Group (CTRad) formed a Joint Working Group with representatives from academia, industry, patient groups and regulatory bodies to address this lack of progress and to publish recommendations for future clinical research. Herein, we highlight the Working Group's consensus recommendations to increase the number of novel drugs being successfully registered in combination with radiotherapy to improve clinical outcomes for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricky A Sharma
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Martin D Forster
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Julian Golec
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Europe) Ltd, Abingdon, UK
| | | | - Emma Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Kevin J Harrington
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Fiona McDonald
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Staffurth
- Cardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Surabhi VR, Menias CO, Amer AM, Elshikh M, Katabathina VS, Hara AK, Baughman WC, Kielar A, Elsayes KM, Siegel CL. Tumors and Tumorlike Conditions of the Anal Canal and Perianal Region: MR Imaging Findings. Radiographics 2016; 36:1339-53. [DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016150209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
44
|
Prognostic impact of tumour burden assessed by metabolic tumour volume on FDG PET/CT in anal canal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016; 44:63-70. [PMID: 27503193 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3475-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to confirm the prognostic value of metabolic tumour volume (MTV) at the primary site on initial work-up FDG PET/CT in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anal canal. METHODS Patients with a recent diagnosis of SCC of the anal canal without metastases undergoing PET/CT for initial work-up and treated with (chemo)radiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Computer-aided MTV and SUVmax were determined. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate prognostic variables of progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The study group comprised 75 patients who had an initial work-up PET/CT. Five patients (6.7 %) had stage I disease, 22 (29.3 %) stage II disease, 20 (26.7 %) stage IIIA disease, and 28 (37.3 %) stage IIIB disease. Median follow-up was 51 months (range 10 - 117 months). Global 4-year OS was 82.7 %, ranging from 100 % in patients with stage I disease to 75 % in patients with stage IIIB disease. MTV at the primary site was significantly and independently correlated with OS (p < 0.05), as patients with MTV less than 7 cm3 had a better prognosis. SUVmax was not correlated with survival parameters. Metabolic involvement of the inguinal lymph nodes was also correlated with a poor outcome in the univariate analysis (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION MTV at the primary site is a prognostic biomarker in anal canal cancer. Hypermetabolic inguinal lymph nodes also appear to be correlated with survival.
Collapse
|
45
|
Mohammadkhani Shali S, Schmitt V, Behrendt FF, Winz OH, Heinzel A, Mottaghy FM, Eble MJ, Verburg FA. Metabolic tumour volume of anal carcinoma on 18FDG PET/CT before combined radiochemotherapy is the only independant determinant of recurrence free survival. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85:1390-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2016] [Accepted: 05/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
46
|
Glynne-Jones R, Saleem W, Harrison M, Mawdsley S, Hall M. Background and Current Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus. Oncol Ther 2016; 4:135-172. [PMID: 28261646 PMCID: PMC5315080 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-016-0024-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review, a summary of our current understanding of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) and the advances in our knowledge of SCCA regarding screening, prevention, the role of the immune system, current treatment and the potential for novel targets are discussed. The present standard of care in terms of treatment is 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C (MMC) concurrently with radiation, which results in a high level of disease control for small early cancers. Preservation of the anal sphincter is achieved in the majority, although anorectal function is often impaired. Although evidence from prospective studies to support a change in the treatment strategy is lacking, patients with HPV-negative SCCA appear to be less responsive to chemoradiation (CRT) and relapse more frequently. In contrast, HPV-positive tumours usually fare better, but oncological outcomes are modified by smoking and immune incompetence. There is current interest in escalating the radiotherapy dose for larger, more advanced tumours, and de-escalating treatment for HPV-positive tumours. The use of novel immunological treatments to target the underlying different molecular pathways of HPV-positive cancers is exciting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Glynne-Jones
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| | - Waqar Saleem
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| | - Mark Harrison
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| | - Suzy Mawdsley
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| | - Marcia Hall
- Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Serkova NJ, Eckhardt SG. Metabolic Imaging to Assess Treatment Response to Cytotoxic and Cytostatic Agents. Front Oncol 2016; 6:152. [PMID: 27471678 PMCID: PMC4946377 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2016] [Accepted: 06/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
For several decades, cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents were considered the basis of anticancer treatment for patients with metastatic tumors. A decrease in tumor burden, assessed by volumetric computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST), was considered as a radiological response to cytotoxic chemotherapies. In addition to RECIST-based dimensional measurements, a metabolic response to cytotoxic drugs can be assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) using (18)F-fluoro-thymidine (FLT) as a radioactive tracer for drug-disrupted DNA synthesis. The decreased (18)FLT-PET uptake is often seen concurrently with increased apparent diffusion coefficients by diffusion-weighted imaging due to chemotherapy-induced changes in tumor cellularity. Recently, the discovery of molecular origins of tumorogenesis led to the introduction of novel signal transduction inhibitors (STIs). STIs are targeted cytostatic agents; their effect is based on a specific biological inhibition with no immediate cell death. As such, tumor size is not anymore a sensitive end point for a treatment response to STIs; novel physiological imaging end points are desirable. For receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors as well as modulators of the downstream signaling pathways, an almost immediate inhibition in glycolytic activity (the Warburg effect) and phospholipid turnover (the Kennedy pathway) has been seen by metabolic imaging in the first 24 h of treatment. The quantitative imaging end points by magnetic resonance spectroscopy and metabolic PET (including 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose, FDG, and total choline) provide an early treatment response to targeted STIs, before a reduction in tumor burden can be seen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie J. Serkova
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
- Developmental Therapeutics Program, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - S. Gail Eckhardt
- Developmental Therapeutics Program, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Anschutz Medical Center, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Goldman KE, White EC, Rao AR, Kaptein JS, Lien WW. Posttreatment FDG-PET-CT response is predictive of tumor progression and survival in anal carcinoma. Pract Radiat Oncol 2016; 6:e149-e154. [PMID: 26948134 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2015] [Revised: 01/04/2016] [Accepted: 01/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We hypothesize that posttreatment F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) metabolic response predicts clinical outcomes in patients with anal cancer treated with chemoradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS This was a single-institution retrospective review of 148 patients treated definitively for anal squamous cell carcinoma between 2005 and 2012. All patients were followed with posttreatment PET-CT scans and clinical examinations. Progression-free survival (PFS), cause-specific survival, and overall survival (OS) estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The median follow-up was 34 months (range, 5-89 months). Pretreatment PET was successful in detecting the primary tumor in 140 cases (95%). Computed tomography (CT) alone was able to detect primary tumors in 78 of 122 patients who had pretreatment CT scans (64%). Inguinal or pelvic lymph nodes were FDG avid in 68 patients, with only 41 of these patients having enlarged lymph nodes by CT criteria (60.3%). Initial posttreatment PET-CT was obtained on average 12.7 ± 4.3 weeks after the last day of radiation (range, 5-25 weeks). Overall complete metabolic response (CR) on initial PET-CT was found in 82 patients (58%). Partial metabolic response was noted in 52 (36.9%) and progression in 7 patients (5%). Only 12/82 patients (14.6%) with a FDG-PET CR eventually recurred. The negative predictive value of a PET-CT scan performed between 13 and 25 weeks posttreatment was 92.9%. The 2-year PFS for patients with CR versus non-CR was 89.8% and 69.2%, respectively (P = .004). The 2-year OS for CR versus non-CR patients was 94.8% and 79.3% (P = .036). CONCLUSIONS Complete metabolic response on posttreatment FDG PET-CT is highly predictive of increased PFS and OS in patients treated with chemoradiation for anal carcinoma. In addition to close clinical surveillance, we recommend obtaining posttreatment PET-CT scans >12 weeks following definitive treatment for anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly E Goldman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, California
| | - Evan C White
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Aroor R Rao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, California
| | - John S Kaptein
- Research Laboratory, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, California
| | - Winston W Lien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Meillan N, Huguet F, Peiffert D. [Follow-up after radiotherapy of anal canal carcinoma]. Cancer Radiother 2015; 19:610-5. [PMID: 26323891 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2015.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2015] [Revised: 06/10/2015] [Accepted: 06/12/2015] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Anal canal carcinoma is a rare and curable disease for which the standard of care is radiation therapy with concurrent 5-fluoro-uracil and mitomycine-based chemotherapy. Post-treatment follow-up however is rather poorly defined. This article offers a review of the various post-treatment surveillance options both for early diagnosis of relapse and care for late treatment effects. While follow-up remains mostly clinical, we will discuss morphologic (endorectal echoendoscopy, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, tomodensitometry and positron emission tomography) and biologic (squamous cell carcinoma antigen and pathology) follow-up so as to determine their diagnostic and prognostic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Meillan
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France.
| | - F Huguet
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - D Peiffert
- Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine (Alexis-Vautrin), 6, avenue de Bourgogne, CS 30519, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Deantonio L, Milia ME, Cena T, Sacchetti G, Perotti C, Brambilla M, Turri L, Krengli M. Anal cancer FDG-PET standard uptake value: correlation with tumor characteristics, treatment response and survival. Radiol Med 2015; 121:54-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s11547-015-0562-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2015] [Accepted: 06/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|