1
|
Afifi ANAM, Powerski M, Jechorek D, Brunner TB, Weigt J, Venerito M. Radiation-induced damage in the upper gastrointestinal tract: clinical presentation, diagnostic tests and treatment options. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 48-49:101711. [PMID: 33317797 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Radiation-induced damage of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract results from radiation of GI tumors or structures adjacent to the GI tract. Radiation-induced damages of the upper GI tract may be acute or delayed, and ranges from lack of appetite, mucosal inflammation (i.e. esophagitis, gastritis, duodenitis) to ulcers, which may be complicated by perforation, penetration, bleeding and stenosis. Radiation-related factors as well as individual patient predisposing factors may increase susceptibility to post-radiation damage. High quality evidence for the treatment of radiation-induced GI damage is scarce and the management is often extrapolated from studies on GI lesions of different etiology. Treatment depends on severity and localization of the radiation-induced damage, and ranges from supportive and dietary measures to endoscopic interventions or surgery. Modern radiation techniques may decrease the incidence and severity of the radiation-induced upper gastrointestinal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed N A M Afifi
- Universitätsklinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Germany
| | - Maciej Powerski
- Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Germany
| | | | - Thomas B Brunner
- Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie, Otto-von-Guericke Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jochen Weigt
- Universitätsklinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Germany
| | - Marino Venerito
- Universitätsklinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Acute organ toxicity correlates with better clinical outcome after chemoradiotherapy in patients with anal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2020; 149:168-173. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
3
|
Abstract
Gastrointestinal cancers are bordered by radiosensitive visceral organs, resulting in a narrow therapeutic window. The search for more efficacious and tolerable therapies raises the possibility that proton beam therapy's (PBT) physical and dosimetric differences from conventional therapy may be better suited to treat both primary and recurrent disease, which carries its own unique challenges. Currently, the maximal efficacy of radiation plans for primary and recurrent anorectal cancer is constrained by delivery techniques and modalities which must consider feasibility challenges and toxicity secondary to exposure of organs at risk (OARs). Studies using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) demonstrate that more precise dose delivery to target volumes improves local control rates and reduces complications. By reducing the low-to-moderate radiation dose-bath to bone marrow, small and large bowel, and skin, PBT may offer an improved side-effect profile. The potential to reduce toxicity, increase patient compliance, minimize treatment breaks, and enable dose escalation or hypofractionation is appealing. In cases where prognosis is favorable, PBT may mitigate long-term morbidity such as secondary malignancies, femoral fractures, and small bowel obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pan YB, Maeda Y, Wilson A, Glynne-Jones R, Vaizey CJ. Late gastrointestinal toxicity after radiotherapy for anal cancer: a systematic literature review. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1427-1437. [PMID: 30264638 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1503713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a paucity of data on incidence and mechanisms of long-term gastrointestinal consequences after chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer. Most of the adverse effects reported were based on traditional external beam radiotherapy whilst only short-term follow-ups have been available for intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and there is lack of knowledge about consequences of dose-escalation radiotherapy. METHOD A systematic literature review. RESULTS Two thousand nine hundred and eighty-five titles (excluding duplicates) were identified through the search; 130 articles were included in this review. The overall incidence of late gastrointestinal toxicity was reported to be 7-64.5%, with Grade 3 and above (classified as severe) up to 33.3%. The most commonly reported late toxicities were fecal incontinence (up to 44%), diarrhea (up to 26.7%), and ulceration (up to 22.6%). Diarrhea, fecal incontinence and buttock pain were associated with lower scores in radiotherapy specific quality of life scales (QLQ-CR29, QLQ-C30, and QLQ-CR38) compared to healthy controls. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy appears to reduce late toxicity. CONCLUSION Late gastrointestinal toxicities are common with severe toxicity seen in one-third of the patients. These symptoms significantly impact on patients' quality of life. Prospective studies with control groups are needed to elucidate long-term toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Bin Pan
- Sir Alan Parks Physiology Unit, St. Mark’s Hospital, Harrow, UK
- Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of TCM, Shanghai, China
| | - Yasuko Maeda
- Sir Alan Parks Physiology Unit, St. Mark’s Hospital, Harrow, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ana Wilson
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- Wolfson Unit of Endoscopy, St. Mark’s Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Faivre JC, Peiffert D, Vendrely V, Lemanski C, Hannoun-Levi JM, Mirabel X, Stanbury T, Salleron J, Guillemin F. Prognostic factors of colostomy free survival in patients presenting with locally advanced anal canal carcinoma: A pooled analysis of two prospective trials (KANAL 2 and ACCORD 03). Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:463-470. [PMID: 30172453 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2018] [Revised: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To carry out a prognosis study of the prospective studies KANAL 2 and ACCORD 03 in order to highlight new prognostic factors of colostomy-free survival in patients with locally advanced anal canal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS KANAL 2 and ACCORD 03 were phase 2 and phase 3 multicenter trials with same inclusion criteria: anal canal squamous cell carcinoma of ≥4 cm or pelvic node involvement treated with conformal radiotherapy (45 Gy/25 fractions plus a boost) and concomitant fluorouracyl and cisplatin at weeks 1 and 5. A multivariate analysis of potential factors (patients, tumors, and treatments) was carried out through Cox proportional hazard model. Results were presented as hazard ratio (HR). RESULTS 387 patients were included. In multivariate analysis, age over 55 years (HR = 0.62, p = 0.013), the increase of circumferential tumor spread (between 1/3 and 2/3 and more than 2/3 compared to less than 1/3) (respectively 1.97, p = 0.015 and 2.94, p < 0.001), the skin ulceration (1.57, p = 0.03), the inguinal node involvement (1,98, p < 0.001) and the total radiotherapy dose above 60 Gy (between 60 and 65 Gy (HR = 0.37, p < 0.001) and >65 Gy (HR = 0.61, p = 0.028)) were associated with colostomy-free survival. CONCLUSION Our study highlights new favorable prognostic factors such as circumferential tumor damage of less than two thirds, age over 55 years, dose escalation boost irradiation and possibly a total radiation dose between 60 and 65 Gy (but the BED dose depends on the overall treatment time). These results could be considered for better selection or stratification of the target population in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Christophe Faivre
- Radiation Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine Alexis-Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; EA 4360 APEMAC, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
| | - Didier Peiffert
- Radiation Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine Alexis-Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; EA 4360 APEMAC, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Véronique Vendrely
- Radiation Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux - Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Pessac, France
| | - Claire Lemanski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle, University of Montpellier, France
| | - Jean-Michel Hannoun-Levi
- Radiation Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Université de Nice, Sophia Antipolis, France
| | - Xavier Mirabel
- Radiation Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | | | - Julia Salleron
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine - Alexis-Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Francis Guillemin
- EA 4360 APEMAC, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France; Inserm CIC 1433 Clinical Epidemiology, and Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Increased evidence for the prognostic value of FDG uptake on late-treatment PET in non-tumour-affected oesophagus in irradiated patients with oesophageal carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 45:1752-1761. [PMID: 29679113 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-3996-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2018] [Accepted: 03/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE 18F-FDG uptake in irradiated non-tumour-affected oesophagus (NTO) on restaging PET is a potential surrogate for the measurement of radiation-induced inflammation. Radiation-induced inflammation itself has been shown to be of high prognostic relevance in patients undergoing preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) for locally advanced oesophageal cancer. We assessed the prognostic relevance of FDG uptake in the NTO in an independent cohort of patients treated with definitive RCT. METHODS This retrospective evaluation included 72 patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive RCT with curative intent. All patients underwent pretreatment and restaging FDG PET after receiving a radiation dose of 40-50 Gy. Standardized uptake values (SUVmax/SUVmean), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and relative changes from pretreatment to restaging PET (∆SUVmax/∆SUVmean) were determined within the tumour and NTO. Univariate Cox regression with respect to overall survival (OS), local control (LC), distant metastases (DM) and treatment failure (TF) was performed. Independence of parameters was tested by multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS ∆SUVmax NTO and MTV were prognostic factors for all investigated clinical endpoints (OS, LC, DM, TF). Inclusion of clinical and PET tumour parameters in multivariate analysis showed that ∆SUVmax NTO was an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, multivariate analysis of ∆SUVmax NTO using previously published cut-off values from preoperatively treated patients revealed that ∆SUVmax NTO was independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 1.88, p = 0.038), TF (HR = 2.11, p = 0.048) and DM (HR = 3.02, p = 0.047). CONCLUSION NTO-related tracer uptake during the course of treatment in patients with oesophageal carcinoma was shown to be of high prognostic relevance. Thus, metabolically activity of NTO measured in terms of ∆SUVmax NTO is a potential candidate for future treatment individualization (i.e. organ preservation).
Collapse
|
7
|
Beschel LM, Leu M, Reichardt SD, Rave-Fränk M, Schirmer MA, Stadelmann C, Canis M, Wolff HA, Reichardt HM. T cell abundance in blood predicts acute organ toxicity in chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Oncotarget 2018; 7:65902-65915. [PMID: 27589568 PMCID: PMC5323201 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2016] [Accepted: 08/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) often results in high-grade acute organ toxicity (HGAOT). As these adverse effects impair the patients' quality of life and the feasibility of the planned therapy, we sought to analyze immunological parameters in tumor material and blood samples obtained from 48 HNSCC patients in order to assess the potential to predict the individual acute organ toxicity. T cells in the tumor stroma were enriched in patients developing HGAOT whereas levels of soluble factors in the plasma and gene expression in whole blood did not coincide with the occurrence of acute organ toxicity. In contrast, the frequency and absolute numbers of selected leukocyte subpopulations measured in samples of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) directly before the beginning of CRT were significantly different in patients with HGAOT as compared to those without. When we validated several potential markers including the abundance of T cells in a small prospective study with 16 HNSCC patients, we were able to correctly predict acute organ toxicity in up to 81% of the patients. We conclude that analysis of PBMCs by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) might be a convenient strategy to identify patients at risk of developing HGAOT caused by CRT, which might allow to adapt the treatment regimen and possibly improve disease outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Milena Beschel
- Institute for Cellular and Molecular Immunology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
| | - Martin Leu
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
| | - Sybille D Reichardt
- Institute for Cellular and Molecular Immunology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
| | - Margret Rave-Fränk
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
| | - Markus A Schirmer
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany.,Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
| | - Christine Stadelmann
- Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
| | - Martin Canis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
| | - Hendrik A Wolff
- University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany.,Present address: Strahlentherapie Radiologie München, Germany
| | - Holger M Reichardt
- Institute for Cellular and Molecular Immunology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sekhar H, Zwahlen M, Trelle S, Malcomson L, Kochhar R, Saunders MP, Sperrin M, van Herk M, Sebag-Montefiore D, Egger M, Renehan AG. Nodal stage migration and prognosis in anal cancer: a systematic review, meta-regression, and simulation study. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:1348-1359. [PMID: 28802802 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30456-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2017] [Revised: 06/01/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA), lymph node positivity (LNP) indicates poor prognosis for survival and is central to radiotherapy planning. Over the past three decades, LNP proportion has increased, mainly reflecting enhanced detection with newer imaging modalities; a process known as nodal stage migration. If accompanied by constant T stage distributions, prognosis for both lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative groups may improve without any increase in overall survival for individual patients; a paradox termed the Will Rogers phenomenon. Here, we aim to systematically evaluate the impact of nodal stage migration on survival in SCCA and address a novel hypothesis that this phenomenon results in reduced prognostic discrimination. METHODS We did a systematic review and meta-regression to quantify changes in LNP over time and the impact of this change on survival and prognostic discrimination. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomised trials and observational studies in patients with SCCA published between Jan 1, 1970, and Oct 11, 2016. Studies were eligible if patients received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy as the main treatment, reported LNP proportions (all studies), and reported overall survival (not necessarily present in all studies). We excluded studies with fewer than 50 patients. We extracted study-level data with a standardised, piloted form. The primary outcome measure was 5-year overall survival. To investigate scenarios in which reduced prognostic discrimination might occur, we simulated varying true LNP proportions and true overall survival, and compared these with expected observed outcomes for varying levels of misclassification of true nodal state. FINDINGS We identified 62 studies reporting LNP proportions, which included 10 569 patients. From these, we included 45 studies (6302 patients) with whole cohort 5-year overall survival, 11 studies with 5-year survival stratified by nodal status, and 20 studies with hazard ratios in our analyses of temporal changes. In 62 studies, the LNP proportions increased from a mean estimate of 15·3% (95% CI 10·5-20·1) in 1980 to 37·1% (34·0-41·3) in 2012 (p<0·0001). In 11 studies with prognostic data, increasing LNP was associated with improved overall survival in both lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative categories, whereas the proportions with combined tumour stage T3 and T4 remained constant. In 20 studies, across a range of LNP proportions from 15% to 40%, the hazard ratios for overall survival of lymph node-positive versus lymph node-negative patients decreased significantly from 2·5 (95% CI 1·8-3·3) at 15% LNP to 1·3 (1·2-1·9; p=0·014) at 40% LNP. The simulated scenarios reproduced this effect if the true LNP proportions were 20% or 25%, but not if the true LNP proportions were 30% or greater. INTERPRETATION We describe a consequence of staging misclassification in anal cancer that we have termed reduced prognostic discrimination. We used this new observation to infer that the LNP proportions of more than 30% seen in modern clinical series (11 out of 15 studies with a median year since 2007) are higher than the true LNP proportion. The introduction of new staging technologies in oncology might misclassify true disease stage, spuriously informing disease management and ultimately increasing the risk of overtreatment. FUNDING Bowel Disease Research Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hema Sekhar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Marcel Zwahlen
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sven Trelle
- Clinical Trials Unit Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lee Malcomson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Rohit Kochhar
- Department of Radiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark P Saunders
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Matthew Sperrin
- Farr Institute, MRC Health eResearch Centre (HeRC), Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Marcel van Herk
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - David Sebag-Montefiore
- Leeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthias Egger
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrew G Renehan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zschaeck S, Hofheinz F, Zöphel K, Bütof R, Jentsch C, Schmollack J, Löck S, Kotzerke J, Baretton G, Weitz J, Baumann M, Krause M. Increased FDG uptake on late-treatment PET in non-tumour-affected oesophagus is prognostic for pathological complete response and disease recurrence in patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44:1813-1822. [PMID: 28600646 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3742-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 05/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early side effects including oesophagitis are potential prognostic factors in patients undergoing radiochemotherapy (RCT) for locally advanced oesophageal cancer (LAEC). We assessed the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake within irradiated non-tumour-affected oesophagus (NTO) during restaging positron emission tomography (PET) as a surrogate for inflammation/oesophagitis. METHODS This retrospective evaluation included 64 patients with LAEC who had completed neoadjuvant RCT and had successful oncological resection. All patients underwent FDG PET/CT before and after RCT. In the restaging PET scan maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVmean) were determined in the tumour and NTO. Univariate Cox regression with respect to overall survival, local control, distant metastases and treatment failure was performed. Independence of clinically relevant parameters was tested in a multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Increased FDG uptake, measured in terms of SUVmean in NTO during restaging was significantly associated with complete pathological remission (p = 0.002) and did not show a high correlation with FDG response of the tumour (rho < 0.3). In the univariate analysis, increased SUVmax and SUVmean in NTO was associated with improved overall survival (p = 0.011, p = 0.004), better local control (p = 0.051, p = 0.044), a lower rate of treatment failure (p < 0.001 for both) and development of distant metastases (p = 0.012, p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, SUVmax and SUVmean in NTO remained a significant prognostic factor for treatment failure (p < 0.001, p = 0.004) and distant metastases (p = 0.040, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS FDG uptake in irradiated normal tissues measured on restaging PET has significant prognostic value in patients undergoing neoadjuvant RCT for LAEC. This effect may potentially be of use in treatment personalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany. .,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- PET Center, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christina Jentsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Julia Schmollack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Biostatistics and Modeling in Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gustavo Baretton
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jürgen Weitz
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiooncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Institute of Radiooncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Glynne-Jones R, Sebag-Montefiore D, Meadows HM, Cunningham D, Begum R, Adab F, Benstead K, Harte RJ, Stewart J, Beare S, Hackshaw A, Kadalayil L. Best time to assess complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:347-356. [PMID: 28209296 PMCID: PMC5337624 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30071-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Revised: 11/08/2016] [Accepted: 11/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines for anal cancer recommend assessment of response at 6-12 weeks after starting treatment. Using data from the ACT II trial, we determined the optimum timepoint to assess clinical tumour response after chemoradiotherapy. METHODS The previously reported ACT II trial was a phase 3 randomised trial of patients of any age with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, squamous cell carcinoma of the anus without metastatic disease from 59 centres in the UK. We randomly assigned patients (by minimisation) to receive either intravenous mitomycin (one dose of 12 mg/m2 on day 1) or intravenous cisplatin (one dose of 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29), with intravenous fluorouracil (one dose of 1000 mg/m2 per day on days 1-4 and 29-32) and radiotherapy (50·4 Gy in 28 daily fractions); and also did a second randomisation after initial therapy to maintenance chemotherapy (fluorouracil and cisplatin) or no maintenance chemotherapy. The primary outcome was complete clinical response (the absence of primary and nodal tumour by clinical examination), in addition to overall survival and progression-free survival from time of randomisation. In this post-hoc analysis, we analysed complete clinical response at three timepoints: 11 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 1), 18 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 2), and 26 weeks from the start of chemoradiotherapy (assessment 3) as well as the overall and progression-free survival estimates of patients with complete clinical response or without complete clinical response at each assessment. We analysed both the overall trial population and a subgroup of patients who had attended each of the three assessments by modified intention-to-treat. This study is registered at controlled-trials.com, ISRCTN 26715889. FINDINGS We enrolled 940 patients from June 4, 2001, until Dec 16, 2008. Complete clinical response was achieved in 492 (52%) of 940 patients at assessment 1 (11 weeks), 665 (71%) of patients at assessment 2 (18 weeks), and 730 (78%) of patients at assessment 3 (26 weeks). 691 patients attended all three assessments and in this subgroup, complete clinical response was reported in 441 (64%) patients at assessment 1, 556 (80%) at assessment 2, and 590 (85%) at assessments 3. 151 (72%) of the 209 patients who had not had a complete clinical response at assessment 1 had a complete clinical response by assessment 3. In the overall trial population of 940 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3 was 83% (95% CI 79-86), 84% (81-87), and 87% (84-89), respectively and was 72% (66-78), 59% (49-67), and 46% (37-55) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessments 1, 2, 3, respectively. In the subgroup of 691 patients, 5 year overall survival in patients who had a clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3 was 85% (81-88), 86% (82-88), and 87% (84-90), respectively, and was 75% (68-80), 61% (50-70), and 48% (36-58) for patients who did not have a complete clinical response at assessment 1, 2, 3, respectively. Similarly, progression-free survival in both the overall trial population and the subgroup was longer in patients who had a complete clinical response, compared with patients who did not have a complete clinical response, at all three assessments. INTERPRETATION Many patients who do not have a complete clinical response when assessed at 11 weeks after commencing chemoradiotherapy do in fact respond by 26 weeks, and the earlier assessment could lead to some patients having unnecessary surgery. Our data suggests that the optimum time for assessment of complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus is 26 weeks from starting chemoradiotherapy. We suggest that guidelines should be revised to indicate that later assessment is acceptable. FUNDING Cancer Research UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Helen M Meadows
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Rubina Begum
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - Fawzi Adab
- North Staffordshire Royal Infirmary, Stoke, UK
| | | | | | | | - Sandy Beare
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | - Latha Kadalayil
- Faculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zschaeck S, Löck S, Leger S, Haase R, Bandurska-Luque A, Appold S, Kotzerke J, Zips D, Richter C, Gudziol V, Schreiber A, Zöphel K, Baumann M, Krause M. FDG uptake in normal tissues assessed by PET during treatment has prognostic value for treatment results in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas undergoing radiochemotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2017; 122:437-444. [PMID: 28222892 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2016] [Revised: 01/26/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Pronounced early side effects have been suggested to be a positive prognostic factor in patients undergoing chemo-radio-therapy (CRT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). We assessed the utility of positron emission tomography (PET) during treatment to analyze the correlation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in off target structures within the irradiated volume with outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two independent cohorts of patients with locally advanced HNSCC, both treated within prospective clinical imaging trials with curatively intended CRT were retrospectively analyzed. The exploratory cohort included 50, the independent validation cohort 26 patients. Uptake of FDG in mucosa and submucosal soft tissues (MST) as well as in other structures was assessed at week 4 during treatment. Considered endpoints were local tumor control (LC) and overall survival (OS). The prognostic value of FDG uptake on the endpoints was measured by the concordance index (ci) using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses based on the continuous variables of the exploratory cohort. RESULTS In the exploratory cohort FDG uptake in MST was prognostic for LC (hazard ratio HR=0.23, p=0.025) and OS (HR=0.30, p=0.003) in univariate analyses. These findings remained significant upon multivariate testing (LC HR=0.14, p=0.011; OS HR=0.20, p=0.001) and were confirmed in the validation cohort for LC (HR=0.15, p=0.034) and OS (HR=0.17, p=0.003). Also the SUVmean threshold of MST that was generated within the exploratory cohort (2.375) yielded significant differences in OS (p=0.006) and a statistical trend for LC (p=0.078) when applied to the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS FDG uptake in normal tissues within the irradiated volume measured by PET during treatment has significant prognostic value in HNSCC. This effect may potentially be of use for personalized treatment adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany.
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Biostatistics and Modeling in Radiation Oncology Group, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Leger
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany
| | - Robert Haase
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany
| | - Anna Bandurska-Luque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany
| | - Steffen Appold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christian Richter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology Dresden, Germany
| | - Volker Gudziol
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Andreas Schreiber
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bar-Ad V, Zhang QE, Harari PM, Axelrod R, Rosenthal DI, Trotti A, Jones CU, Garden AS, Song G, Foote RL, Raben D, Shenouda G, Spencer SA, Harris J, Le QT. Correlation Between the Severity of Cetuximab-Induced Skin Rash and Clinical Outcome for Head and Neck Cancer Patients: The RTOG Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95:1346-1354. [PMID: 27212198 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2016] [Revised: 03/04/2016] [Accepted: 03/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the severity of cetuximab-induced skin rash and its correlation with clinical outcome and late skin toxicity in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiation therapy and cetuximab. METHODS AND MATERIALS Analysis included patients who received loading dose and ≥1 cetuximab dose concurrent with definitive chemoradiation therapy (70 Gy + cisplatin) or postoperative chemoradiation therapy (60-66 Gy + docetaxel or cisplatin). RESULTS Six hundred two patients were analyzed; 383 (63.6%) developed grade 2 to 4 cetuximab rash. Patients manifesting grade 2 to 4 rash had younger age (P<.001), fewer pack-years smoking history (P<.001), were more likely to be males (P=.04), and had p16-negative (P=.04) oropharyngeal tumors (P=.003). In univariate analysis, grade 2 to 4 rash was associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, P<.001) and progression-free survival (HR 0.75, P=.02), and reduced distant metastasis rate (HR 0.61, P=.03), but not local-regional failure (HR 0.79, P=.16) relative to grade 0 to 1 rash. In multivariable analysis, HRs for overall survival, progression-free survival, distant metastasis, and local-regional failure were, respectively, 0.68 (P=.008), 0.85 (P=.21), 0.64 (P=.06), and 0.89 (P=.48). Grade ≥2 rash was associated with improved survival in p16-negative patients (HR 0.28 [95% confidence interval 0.11-0.74]) but not in p16-positive patients (HR 1.10 [0.42-2.89]) (P=.05 for interaction). Twenty-five percent of patients with grade 2 to 4 acute in-field radiation dermatitis experienced grade 2 to 4 late skin fibrosis, versus 14% of patients with grade 0 to 1 acute in-field radiation dermatitis (P=.002). CONCLUSION Grade 2 to 4 cetuximab rash was associated with better survival, possibly due to reduction of distant metastasis. This observation was noted mainly in p16-negative patients. Grade 2 to 4 acute in-field radiation dermatitis was associated with higher rate of late grade 2 to 4 skin fibrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Voichita Bar-Ad
- Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Qiang Ed Zhang
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Paul M Harari
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Rita Axelrod
- Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Andy Trotti
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Adam S Garden
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Guobin Song
- Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - David Raben
- University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Denver, Colorado
| | | | | | - Jonathan Harris
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cao CN, Luo JW, Gao L, Yi JL, Huang XD, Wang K, Zhang SP, Qu Y, Li SY, Xiao JP, Zhang Z, Xu GZ. Concurrent chemotherapy for T4 classification nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0119101. [PMID: 25747589 PMCID: PMC4352046 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2014] [Accepted: 01/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate concurrent chemotherapy for T4 classification nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods From July 2004 to June 2011, 180 non-metastatic T4 classification NPC patients were retrospectively analyzed. Of these patients, 117 patients were treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using IMRT and 63 cases were treated by IMRT alone. Results The median follow-up time was 58.97 months (range, 2.79–114.92) months. For all the patients, the 1, 3 and 5-year local failure-free survival (LFFS) rates were 97.7%, 89.2% and 85.9%, regional failure free survival (RFFS) rates were 98.9%, 94.4% and 94.4%, distant failure-free survival (DFFS) rates were 89.7%, 79.9% and 76.2%, and overall survival (OS) rates were 92.7%, 78.9% and 65.3%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in LFFS, RFFS, DFFS and OS between the CCRT group and the IMRT alone group. No statistically significant difference was observed in acute toxicity except leukopenia (p = 0.000) during IMRT between the CCRT group and the IMRT alone group. Conclusion IMRT alone for T4 classification NPC achieved similar treatment outcomes in terms of disease local control and overall survival as compared to concurrent chemotherapy plus IMRT. However, this is a retrospective study with a limited number of patients, such results need further investigation in a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cai-neng Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jing-wei Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- * E-mail:
| | - Li Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jun-lin Yi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-dong Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shi-ping Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Qu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Su-yan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jian-ping Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Guo-zhen Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tehrany N, Kitz J, Rave-Fränk M, Lorenzen S, Li L, Küffer S, Hess CF, Burfeind P, Reichardt HM, Canis M, Beissbarth T, Wolff HA. High-grade acute organ toxicity and p16(INK4A) expression as positive prognostic factors in primary radio(chemo)therapy for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Strahlenther Onkol 2015; 191:566-72. [PMID: 25575976 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-014-0801-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2014] [Accepted: 12/18/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Superior treatment response and survival for patients with human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive head and neck cancer (HNSCC) are documented in clinical studies. However, the relevance of high-grade acute organ toxicity (HGAOT), which has also been correlated with improved prognosis, has attracted scant attention in HPV-positive HNSCC patients. Hence we tested the hypothesis that both parameters, HPV and HGAOT, are positive prognostic factors in patients with HNSCC treated with definite radiotherapy (RT) or radiochemotherapy (RCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Pretreatment tumor tissue and clinical records were available from 233 patients receiving definite RT (62 patients) or RCT (171 patients). HPV infection was analysed by means of HPV DNA detection or p16(INK4A) expression; HGAOT was defined as the occurrence of acute organ toxicity >grade 2 according to the Common Toxicity Criteria. Both variables were correlated with overall survival (OS) using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS Positivity for HPV DNA (44 samples, 18.9 %) and p16(INK4A) expression (102 samples, 43.8 %) were significantly correlated (p < 0.01), and HGAOT occurred in 77 (33 %) patients. Overall, the 5-year OS was 23 %; stratified for p16(INK4A) expression and HGAOT, OS rates were 47 %, 42 %, 20 % and 10 % for patients with p16(INK4A) expression and HGAOT, patients with HGAOT only, patients with p16(INK4A) expression only, and patients without p16(INK4A) expression or HGAOT, respectively. After multivariate testing p16(INK4A) expression (p = 0.003) and HGAOT (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with OS. CONCLUSION P16(INK4A) expression and HGAOT are independent prognostic factors for OS of patients with HNSCC, whereas p16(INK4A) expression is particularly important for patients without HGAOT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narges Tehrany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wolff HA, Conradi LC, Beissbarth T, Leha A, Hohenberger W, Merkel S, Fietkau R, Raab HR, Tschmelitsch J, Hess CF, Becker H, Wittekind C, Sauer R, Rödel C, Liersch T. Gender affects acute organ toxicity during radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer: long-term results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 phase III trial. Radiother Oncol 2013; 108:48-54. [PMID: 23768685 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2012] [Revised: 04/26/2013] [Accepted: 05/02/2013] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The CAO/ARO/AIO-94 phase-III-trial demonstrated a significant improvement of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus postoperative CRT on local control for UICC stage II/III rectal cancer patients, but no effect on long-term survival. In this add-on evaluation, we investigated the association of gender and age with acute toxicity and outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS According to actual treatment analyses, 654 of 799 patients had received pre- (n=406) or postoperative CRT (n=248); in 145 patients postoperative CRT was not applied. Gender, age and clinicopathological parameters were correlated with CRT-associated acute toxicity and survival. RESULTS The 10-year survival was higher in women than in men, with 72.4% versus 65.6% for time to recurrence (p=0.088) and 62.7% versus 58.4% for overall-survival (OS) (p=0.066), as expected. For patients receiving CRT, women showed higher hematologic (p<0.001) and acute organ toxicity (p<0.001) in the entire cohort as well as in subgroup analyses according to pre- (p=0.016) and postoperative CRT (p<0.001). Lowest OS was seen in patients without acute toxicity (p=0.0271). Multivariate analyses for OS showed that acute organ toxicity (p=0.034) was beneficial while age (p<0.001) was associated with worse OS. DISCUSSION Female gender is significantly associated with CRT-induced acute toxicity in rectal cancer. Acute toxicity during CRT may be associated with improved long-term outcome.
Collapse
|
16
|
Hennies S, Hermann RM, Gaedcke J, Grade M, Hess CF, Christiansen H, Wolff HA. Increasing toxicity during neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy as positive prognostic factor for patients with esophageal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus 2013; 27:146-51. [PMID: 23574528 DOI: 10.1111/dote.12067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to correlate acute organ toxicity during preoperative radiochemotherapy with overall survival and tumor regression for patients with primarily operable esophageal carcinoma. From 1995 to 2002, 60 patients with primarily operable esophageal carcinoma were treated in a preoperative setting at our department. Thirty-three percent of the patients had International Union against Cancer (UICC)-stage II tumors, 62% had UICC-stage III tumors, and 5% had UICC-stage IVA tumors. All patients received irradiation (40 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction). Chemotherapy for all patients with adenocarcinoma and, from 2001, also for patients with squamous cell carcinoma consisted of two cycles, 5-fluorouracil and cisplatinum; between 1995 and 2001, patients with squamous cell carcinoma received three courses of chemotherapy (folinic acid, etoposide, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatinum every 3 weeks) before and further cisplatinum and etoposide during radiotherapy. We found a significant correlation between acute organ toxicity and histopathological tumor regression, as well as overall survival. The probability to achieve tumor regression grade 1 after radiochemotherapy was nearly four times higher for patients with worsening of odynophagia than for those without an increase (odds ratio: 3.97). Patients with worsening of odynophagia had a 5-year overall-survival rate of 66% compared with 39% in patients without (P = 0.048). Our data indicate that normal tissue and tumor tissue may behave similar with respect to treatment response, as acute organ toxicity showed to be an independent prognostic marker in our patient population. The hypothesis should be further analyzed on biomolecular and clinical level in future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hennies
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medicine Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wolff HA, Wagner DM, Conradi LC, Hennies S, Ghadimi M, Hess CF, Christiansen H. Irradiation with protons for the individualized treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a planning study with clinical implications. Radiother Oncol 2011; 102:30-7. [PMID: 22112780 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2011] [Revised: 09/20/2011] [Accepted: 10/17/2011] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Ongoing clinical trials aim to improve local control and overall survival rates by intensification of therapy regimen for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. It is well known that whenever treatment is intensified, risk of therapy-related toxicity rises. An irradiation with protons could possibly present an approach to solve this dilemma by lowering the exposure to the organs-at-risk (OAR) without compromising tumor response. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty five consecutive patients were treated from 04/2009 to 5/2010. For all patients, four different treatment plans including protons, RapidArc, IMRT and 3D-conformal-technique were retrospectively calculated and analyzed according to dosimetric aspects. RESULTS Detailed DVH-analyses revealed that protons clearly reduced the dose to the OAR and entire normal tissue when compared to other techniques. Furthermore, the conformity index was significantly better and target volumes were covered consistent with the ICRU guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Planning results suggest that treatment with protons can improve the therapeutic tolerance for the irradiation of rectal cancer, particularly for patients scheduled for an irradiation with an intensified chemotherapy regimen and identified to be at high risk for acute therapy-related toxicity. However, clinical experiences and long-term observation are needed to assess tumor response and related toxicity rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hendrik Andreas Wolff
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
High-grade acute organ toxicity as positive prognostic factor in primary radio(chemo)therapy for locally advanced, inoperable head and neck cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2010; 186:262-8. [PMID: 20437012 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-010-2136-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2010] [Accepted: 03/05/2010] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To test for a possible correlation between high-grade acute organ toxicity during primary radio(chemo)therapy and treatment outcome in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS From 05/1994 to 01/2009, 216 HNSCC patients were treated with radio(chemo)therapy in primary approach. They received normofractionated (2 Gy/fraction) irradiation including associated nodal drainage sites to a cumulative dose of 70 Gy. 151 patients received additional concomitant chemotherapy (111 patients 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C, 40 patients cisplatin-based). Toxicity during treatment was monitored weekly according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC), and any toxicity grade CTC >or= 3 of mucositis, dysphagia or skin reaction was assessed as high-grade acute organ toxicity for later analysis. RESULTS A statistically significant coherency between high-grade acute organ toxicity and overall survival as well as locoregional control was found: patients with CTC >or= 3 acute organ toxicity had a 5-year overall survival rate of 44% compared to 8% in patients without (p < 0.01). Thereby, multivariate analyses revealed that the correlation was independent of other possible prognostic factors or factors that may influence treatment toxicity, especially concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy technique or treatment-planning procedure. CONCLUSION These data indicate that normal tissue and tumor tissue may behave similarly with respect to treatment response, as high-grade acute organ toxicity during radio(chemo)therapy showed to be an independent prognostic marker in the own patient population. However, the authors are aware of the fact that a multivariate analysis in a retrospective study generally has statistical limitations. Therefore, their hypothesis should be further analyzed on biomolecular and clinical levels and other tumor entities in prospective trials.
Collapse
|