Long-term outcomes in patients with isolated supraclavicular nodal recurrence after mastectomy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for breast cancer

A retrospective study of adjuvant proton radiotherapy for breast cancer after lumpectomy: a comparison of conventional-dose and hypofractionated dose

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the adverse reactions of conventional-dose and hypofractionated dose of proton therapy for breast cancer.

Materials and methods

Breast cancer patients treated with proton radiotherapy in conventional-dose or hypofractionated dose were studied retrospectively.

Result

From January 2017 to December 2019, our center treated 50 patients following lumpectomy with proton radiotherapy. According to the AJCC 8th Edition standard, there were stage I in 26 patients, stage II in 22 patients, and stage III in 2 patients. A total of 14 patients received intensity-modulated proton therapy at a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, followed by a 10 Gy 4 fractionated boost to the lumpectomy cavity, while 36 received 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions, simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) 48 Gy to the lumpectomy cavity. Median follow-up time for 40.05 Gy group was 35.6 months (15–43 months). Median follow-up time for 50 Gy group was 46.8 months (36–68 months). For acute toxicity, the grade 1 and 2 radiodermatitis in conventional-dose group were 35.7% and 57.1%, respectively. In hypofractionated dose group, the grade 1 and 2 radiodermatitis were 91.7% and 8.3%, respectively. The radiodermatitis is hypofractionneted dose better than conventional-dose significantly. Grade 1 radiation-induced esophagitis in conventional-dose group and hypofractionated dose group were 85.71% and 60%, respectively. For late toxicity, no patients developed radiation-induced pneumonitis and rib fracture in conventional-dose group. Three patients presented grade 1 pneumonitis; one patient presented graded 2 pneumonitides and two patients presented rib fracture in hypofractionated dose group. One presented hypothyroidism in hypofractionated dose group. All patients were satisfied with breast shape. The one- and two-year OS and DFS for conventional-dose group were 100 and 100; 100 and 92.9%, respectively. The one- and two-year OS and DFS for hypofractionated dose group were 100 and 100; 100 and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion

Proton radiation therapy can significantly reduce the normal tissue dose in breast cancer patients' hearts, lungs, and other organs. Hypofractionated proton therapy shortens the treatment course with mild radiation-related adverse effects, and has a better effect on addressing the acute adverse reactions than conventional proton radiotherapy.

Long-Term Outcomes of Breast Cancer Patients Who Underwent Selective Neck Dissection for Metachronous Isolated Supraclavicular Nodal Metastasis

We retrospectively enrolled 139 patients who developed metachronous isolated supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (miSLNM) from 8129 consecutive patients who underwent primary surgery between 1990 and 2008 at a single medical center. The median age was 47 years. The median follow-up time from date of primary tumor surgery was 73.1 months, and the median time to the date of neck relapse was 43.9 months in this study. Sixty-one (43.9%) patients underwent selective neck dissection (SND). The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), post-recurrence survival, and overall survival (OS) rates in the SND group were 31.1%, 40.3%, and 68.9%, respectively, whereas those of the no-SND group were 9.7%, 32.9%, and 57.7%, respectively (p = 0.001). No SND and time interval from primary tumor surgery to neck relapse ≤24 months were the only significant risk factors in the multivariate analysis of DMFS (hazard ratio (HR), 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23-2.56; p = 0.002 and HR, 1.76, 95% CI, 1.23-2.52; p = 0.002, respectively) and OS (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.22-2.55; p = 0.003 and HR, 3.54, 95% CI, 2.44-5.16; p < 0.0001, respectively). Multimodal therapy, including neck dissection, significantly improved the DMFS and OS of miSLNM. Survival improvement after miSLNM control by intensive surgical treatment suggests that miSLNM is not distant metastasis.

Survival and Prognostic Factors for Breast Cancer Patients with Regional Oligo-Recurrence

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate survival outcomes and identify prognostic factors for regional oligo-recurrence in breast cancer patients who received salvage local treatment.

Methods

In the breast cancer registry of our institution, 18,790 patients received curative surgery for stage I-III breast cancer between January 1995 and June 2016. Of those patients, only 87 (0.5%)underwent salvage local treatment for isolated nodal recurrence on the axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) (n = 58), supraclavicular lymph nodes (SCNs) (n = 17), or internal mammary lymph nodes (IMNs) (n = 12).

Results

The median follow-up duration after regional oligo-recurrence was 49 months (range: 6-194 months). For patients with recurrence of ALN, SCN, or IMN, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 40.0%, 32.1%, and 25.0%, respectively (p = 0.3) and 62.7%, 70.0%, and 58.3%, respectively(p = 0.97). In the multivariable analysis for PFS, age at recurrence ≥ 65 years, disease-free interval < 24 months, non-luminal A subtype, and in-field failure (marginally significant) were found to be risk factors (RFs). However, the location of the tumor was not a significant factor for PFS (p = 0.71). When we stratified patients by the number of RFs, the 5-year PFS rates were 67.5% for patients with ≤ 1 RF and 7.3% for those with > 1 RF (p < 0.01). For patients with ≤ 1 RF, the 5-year PFS rates were 73.5% in the ALN group and 51.1% in the SCN/IMN group (p = 0.09). For patients with > 1 RF, the 5-year PFS rates were 7.3% in the ALN group and 7.1% in the SCN/IMN group (p = 1.00).

Conclusion

In breast cancer patients with regional oligo-recurrence, clinical outcomes after salvage treatment were favorable in patients with ≤ 1 RF, while patients with > 1 RF had poor prognoses irrespective of the location of recurrence.

Outcomes Following Salvage Radiation and Systemic Therapy for Isolated Locoregional Recurrence of Breast Cancer after Mastectomy: Impact of Constructed Biologic Subtype

Purpose

This study examines factors associated with outcomes following salvage radiation and systemic therapy for breast cancer patients who developed isolated locoregional recurrence (ILRR) after mastectomy alone, while focusing on the prognostic significance of constructed biologic subtype in this setting.

Methods and Materials

269 postmastectomy patients in total treated for ILRR were included. Cumulative incidence of locoregional control (LRC), distant metastasis (DM)-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. For statistical analysis, biologic subtypes were constructed from hormonal receptors (Rec) and HER2, consisting of Rec+/HER2-, Rec+/HER2+, Rec-/HER2+, and Rec-/HER2-. The association of clinic-pathological and treatment-related parameters with outcomes was evaluated using a Cox regression model.

Results

At a median follow-up of 65 months, 56 (20.8%) patients failed to secure LRC after radiotherapy, and 165 patients (61.3%) developed DM. Overall, the actuarial 5-year LRC, DMFS, DFS, and OS rate was 77.3%, 45.6%, 43.9%, and 66.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that constructed biologic subtype represented the most significant prognostic factor for any outcome. Compared to patients with Rec+/HER2- disease, those with Rec-/HER2- had significantly poorer 5-year LRC (84.2% versus 58.3%, HR = 4.36, P < 0.001) and worse survivals including 5-year DMFS (63.0% versus 15.8%, HR = 4.28, P < 0.001), DFS (59.7% versus 13.6%, HR=3.92, P < 0.001), and OS (87.8% versus 22.3%, HR = 8.55, P < 0.001). Other factors associated with reduced LRC were no radical surgery and involved field irradiation alone, whereas factors associated with poor survivals included positive nodes at primary diagnosis and regional recurrence.

Conclusions

Constructed biologic subtypes remained to be predictive of both disease control and survivals after salvage radiation for postmastectomy ILRR. Notably, Rec-/HER2- patients were demonstrated to be at high risk of locoregional failure and subsequent DM and tended to have worse survivals despite salvage therapies.

Salvage radiotherapy for second oligo-recurrence in patients with breast cancer

A new concept designated 'oligo-recurrence (OR)' has been proposed, which indicates one to several distant metastases/recurrences in one or more organs, which can be treated with local therapy, after the primary site of the cancer has been controlled. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of salvage radiotherapy (RT) for the second OR of breast cancer. The second OR was defined as once-salvaged patients with OR who had a second failure that was also detected as the state of OR. Twenty-one patients with second OR were treated with salvage RT and were retrospectively analyzed. The sites of the second OR were locoregional recurrence in 7 patients and distant metastasis in 14 patients. Salvage RT was performed at a median total dose of 60 Gy. Nineteen (90%) patients had an objective response. The median overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) times were 41 and 24 months after salvage RT for the second OR, respectively. The 3-year local (in-field) control (LC) rates were 93%. The toxicities were mild; acute toxicities ≥Grade 3 were seen in one patient with Grade 3 dermatitis, and no late toxicity ≥Grade 2 was observed. In conclusion, salvage RT for the second OR was able to achieve a better LC rate and longer PFS time without inducing severe toxicity, and therefore may be a potentially effective modality for inducing long-term survival in select patients.

Benefit of post-mastectomy radiotherapy of the supra-/infraclavicular lymphatic drainage area in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the survival benefit of radiotherapy (RT) of the supra- and infraclavicular lymphatic drainage area in Chinese women with T1-2N1M0 breast cancer receiving mastectomy.

METHODS

A total of 593 cases were retrospectively reviewed from 1998 to 2007. The relationship between supra- or infraclavicular fossa relapse (SCFR) and post-operative RT at the supra-/infraclavicular lymphatic drainage area was evaluated.

RESULTS

The majority of patients (532/593; 89. 8%) received no RT while 61 patients received RT. The median follow-up was 85 months. Among patients without RT, 54 (10. 2%) developed recurrence in the chest wall or ipsilateral SCFR. However, none of the 61 patients who underwent RT demonstrated SCFR. One patient who received RT (1. 6%) experienced recurrence in the chest wall. Univariate analysis revealed that age and molecular subtype (both P < 0. 05) were two prognostic factors related to supraclavicular and infraclavicular fossa relapse-free survival (SFRFS). Multivariate analysis revealed that only Her-2 positive status (P = 0. 011) was an independent predictor of SFRFS. RT had no influence on distant metastasis (P = 0. 328) or overall survival (P = 0. 541). SCFR significantly affected probability of distant metastasis (P < 0. 001) and overall survival (P < 0. 001).

CONCLUSION

Although RT was not significantly associated with SFRFS, postoperative RT was significantly associated with a lower locoregional (i. e. , supraclavicular/infraclavicular and chest wall) recurrence rate. SCFR significantly influenced distant metastasis-free survival, which significantly influenced the overall survival of T1- 2N1M0 breast cancer patients after mastectomy. Thus, prophylactic RT is recommended in T1-2N1M0 breast cancer patients, especially those who have Her-2 positive lesions.

Prophylactic supraclavicular radiotherapy after surgery in high-risk n1 breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of prophylactic supraclavicular radiotherapy (RT) by comparing the clinical outcomes of locoregional recurrence (LRR) in high-risk N1 breast cancer.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective comparison study of 250 high-risk N1 breast cancer patients treated at two institutions. Patients were considered to be high-risk when they had more than two of the following risk factors: lymphovascular invasion, extracapsular extension, metastasis to more than two axillary lymph nodes (ALNs), or level II or higher ALN metastasis. We compared two groups treated with different adjuvant RT fields for the purpose of prophylactic supraclavicular RT (SCRT).

RESULTS

Among the 250 patients, 97 patients received SCRT while 153 did not. During follow-up, 32 patients (7 in the SCRT and 25 in the no-SCRT group) had recurrence, and LRR developed in 19 patients, 18 of whom had not received SCRT. In multivariate analysis, SCRT [hazard ratio (HR) 0.072; p = 0.011] and chemotherapy regimen (cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, and taxane; TAC) were the significant prognostic factors in LRR-free survival (HR 0.385; p = 0.046), and chemotherapy regimen also showed significance for distant metastasis-free survival (HR 0.399; p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of prophylactic SCRT may reduce the risk of LRR in patients with high-risk N1 breast cancer.