Adoption of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer after publication of randomized trials

Dissemination and Implementation-A Primer for Accelerating "Time to Translation" in Radiation Oncology

The field of radiation oncology has achieved significant technological and scientific advancements in the 21st century. Yet uptake of new evidence-based practices has been heterogeneous, even in the presence of national and international guidelines. Addressing barriers to practice change requires a deliberate focus on developing and testing strategies tailored to improving care delivery and quality, especially for vulnerable patient populations. Implementation science provides a systematic approach to developing and testing strategies, though applications in radiation oncology remain limited. In this critical review, we aim to (1) assess the time from first evidence to widespread adoption, or "time to translation," across multiple evidence-based practices involving radiation therapy, and (2) provide a primer on the application of implementation science to radiation oncology. Specifically, we discuss potential targets for implementation research in radiation oncology, including both evidence-based practices and quality metrics, and highlight examples of studies evaluating implementation strategies. We also define key concepts and frameworks in the field of implementation science, review common study designs, including hybrid trials and cluster randomization, and discuss the interaction with related disciplines such as quality improvement and behavioral economics. Ultimately, this review aims to illustrate how a comprehensive understanding of implementation science could be used to promote equity and quality in cancer care through the development of effective, scalable, and sustainable care delivery solutions.

Capturing Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Dose Among Breast Cancer Patients With the Utah All-Payer Claims Database Compared With Gold-Standard Abstraction

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the validity of the Utah statewide All-Payer Claims Database (APCD), we compared breast cancer-specific treatments and dosages with gold-standard abstraction of medical records.

STUDY DESIGN

In this pilot study, breast cancer treatments were abstracted by a certified tumor registrar at the Utah Cancer Registry (UCR) for patients diagnosed in 2013 with breast cancer. The abstraction of medical records was the gold standard for comparison with treatments identified in the APCD. The reliability and agreement between the treatment identified in the APCD and abstraction data were measured with sensitivity and specificity. Dose consistency was measured with the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

RESULTS

Compared with the 186 abstractions, the sensitivity of the APCD to identify chemotherapy agents was high: 89% for any agent, 91% for carboplatin, 83% for docetaxel, 82% for doxorubicin, or 94.7% for biologic therapy. The consistency between the chemotherapy dosage identified in the claims and the abstraction varied from 63% to 76%. For radiotherapy, the sensitivity of the claims to identify the completed radiotherapy regimen was 66%. The ICC between radiotherapy doses identified in the claims and the abstraction was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48%, 67%).

CONCLUSIONS

Employing these novel methods, the claims were highly reliable in identifying cancer treatment agents overall, namely carboplatin, docetaxel, and trastuzumab. The claims were of moderate utility in capturing the treatment dose information. In addition to the APCD, the use of multiple data sources improved the completeness of cancer treatment information.

Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy: A Cross-sectional Survey Study of US Radiation Oncologists

OBJECTIVES

For many malignancies, hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) is an accepted standard associated with decreased treatment time and costs. United States provider beliefs regarding HFRT likely impact its adoption but are poorly studied. We surveyed US-based radiation oncologists (ROs) to gauge HFRT utilization rates for prostate (PC), breast (BC), and rectal cancer (RC) and to characterize the beliefs governing these decisions.

METHODS

From July to October 2021, an anonymized, online survey was electronically distributed to ROs actively practicing in the United States. Demographic and practice characteristic information was collected. Questions assessing rates of offering HFRT for PC, BC, and RC and perceived limitations towards using HFRT were administered.

RESULTS

A total of 203 eligible respondents (72% male, 72% White, 53% nonacademic practice, 69% with 11+ years in practice) were identified. Approximately 50% offered stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early/favorable intermediate risk PC. Although >90% of ROs offered whole-breast HFRT for early-stage BC, only 33% offered accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI). Overall, 41% of ROs offered short-course neoadjuvant RT for RC. The primary reported barriers to HFRT utilization were lack of data, inexperience, and referring provider concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

HFRT is safe, effective, and beneficial, yet underutilized-particularly prostate SBRT, APBI, and short-course RT for RC. Skills retraining and education of ROs and referring providers may increase utilization rates.

Increase in Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy Among Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer or Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Who is Left Behind?

PURPOSE

We aimed to update the trend of hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) use over time in the US and examine factors associated with lack of HF-WBI adoption for patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer (IBC) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) undergoing a lumpectomy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Among patients who underwent a lumpectomy, we identified 928,034 patients with early-stage IBC and 330,964 patients with DCIS in the 2004 to 2020 National Cancer Database. We defined HF-WBI as 2.5-3.33 Gy/fraction to the breast and conventionally fractionated WBI as 1.8-2.0 Gy/fraction. We evaluated the trend of HF-WBI utilization using a generalized linear model with the log link and binomial distribution. Factors associated with HF-WBI utilization were assessed using multivariable logistic regression in patients diagnosed between 2018 and 2020.

RESULTS

Among patients with IBC, HF-WBI use has significantly increased from 0.7% in 2004 to 63.9% in 2020. Similarly, HF-WBI usage among patients with DCIS has also increased significantly from 0.4% in 2004 to 56.6% in 2020. Black patients with IBC were less likely than White patients to receive HF-WBI (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.85). Community cancer programs were less likely to administer HF-WBI to patients with IBC (AOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77-0.84) and to those with DCIS (AOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.96) than academic/research programs. Younger age, positive nodes, larger tumor size, low volume programs, and facility location were also associated with lack of HF-WBI adoption in both patient cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

HF-WBI utilization among postlumpectomy patients has significantly increased from 2004 to 2020 and can finally be considered standard of care in the US. We found substantial disparities in adoption within patient and facility subgroups. Reducing disparities in HF-WBI adoption has the potential to further alleviate health care costs while improving patients' quality of life.

The impact of advancing the standard of care in radiotherapy on operational treatment resources

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the impact of implementing hypofractionated prescription regimens and advanced treatment techniques on institutional operational hours and radiotherapy personnel resources in a multi-institutional setting. The study may be used to describe the impact of advancing the standard of care with modern radiotherapy techniques on patient and staff resources.

METHODS

This study uses radiation therapy data extracted from the radiotherapy information system from two tertiary care, university-affiliated cancer centers from 2012 to 2021. Across all patients in the analysis, the average fraction number for curative and palliative patients was reported each year in the decade. Also, the institutional operational treatment hours are reported for both centers. A sub-analysis for curative intent breast and lung radiotherapy patients was performed to contextualize the impact of changes to imaging, motion management, and treatment technique.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2021, Center 1 had 42 214 patient plans and Center 2 had 43 252 patient plans included in the analysis. Averaged over both centers across the decade, the average fraction number per patient decreased from 6.9 to 5.2 (25%) and 21.8 to 17.2 (21%) for palliative and curative patients, respectively. The operational treatment hours for both institutions increased from 8 h 15 min to 9 h 45 min (18%), despite a patient population increase of 45%.

CONCLUSION

The clinical implementation of hypofractionated treatment regimens has successfully reduced the radiotherapy workload and operational treatment hours required to treat patients. This analysis describes the impact of changes to the standard of care on institutional resources.

Use of focal radiotherapy boost for prostate cancer: radiation oncologists' perspectives and perceived barriers to implementation

BACKGROUND

In a recent phase III randomized control trial, delivering a focal radiotherapy (RT) boost to tumors visible on MRI was shown to improve disease-free survival and regional/distant metastasis-free survival for patients with prostate cancer-without increasing toxicity. The aim of this study was to assess how widely this technique is being applied in current practice, as well as physicians' perceived barriers toward its implementation.

METHODS

We invited radiation oncologists to complete an online questionnaire assessing their use of intraprostatic focal boost in December 2022 and February 2023. To include perspectives from a broad range of practice settings, the invitation was distributed to radiation oncologists worldwide via email list, group text platform, and social media.

RESULTS

263 radiation oncologist participants responded. The highest-represented countries were the United States (42%), Mexico (13%), and the United Kingdom (8%). The majority of participants worked at an academic medical center (52%) and considered their practice to be at least partially genitourinary (GU)-subspecialized (74%). Overall, 43% of participants reported routinely using intraprostatic focal boost. Complete GU-subspecialists were more likely to implement focal boost, with 61% reporting routine use. In both high-income and low-to-middle-income countries, less than half of participants routinely use focal boost. The most cited barriers were concerns about registration accuracy between MRI and CT (37%), concerns about risk of additional toxicity (35%), and challenges to accessing high-quality MRI (29%).

CONCLUSIONS

Two years following publication of a randomized trial of patient benefit without increased toxicity, almost half of the radiation oncologists surveyed are now routinely offering focal RT boost. Further adoption of this technique might be aided by increased access to high-quality MRI, better registration algorithms of MRI to CT simulation images, physician education on benefit-to-harm ratio, and training on contouring prostate lesions on MRI.

The Choosing Wisely Oncology Canada Cancer List: An Update

BACKGROUND

Choosing Wisely (CW) Canada is a national campaign to identify unnecessary or harmful services that are frequently used in Canada. The original CW Oncology Canada Cancer list was developed in 2014. A CW Oncology Canada working group was established to review new evidence and guidelines and to update the current CW Oncology Canada Cancer List.

METHODS

Between January and March 2022, we conducted a survey of members of the Canadian Association of Medical Oncology (CAMO), Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology (CARO) and the Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology (CSSO). We took the feedback from the survey, including potential new recommendations as well as those that were thought to be no longer relevant and up to date, and conducted a literature review with the assistance of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (CADTH). The final updated list of recommendations was made by the CW Oncology Canada working group based on a consensus process.

RESULTS

We reviewed two potential recommendations to add and two potential recommendations to remove from the existing CW Oncology Canada Cancer List. The recommendation "Do not prescribe whole brain radiation over stereotactic radiosurgery for patient with limited brain metastases (≤4 lesions)" was supported by several evidence-based guidelines with the strength of recommendations ranging from strong to moderate and the quality of evidence ranging from level 1 to level 3. After reviewing the evidence, the working group felt that the other potential recommendation to add and the two potential recommendations to remove did not have sufficient strength and quality of evidence at this time to be added or removed from the list.

CONCLUSION

The updated Choosing Wisely Oncology Canada Cancer List consists of 11 items that oncologists should question in the treatment of patients with cancer. This list can be used to design specific interventions to reduce low value care.

Radiation Oncology Virtual Education Rotation (ROVER) 2.0 for Residents: Implementation and Outcomes

The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed the integration of a virtual education curriculum to support radiation oncologists in training. We report outcomes from Radiation Oncology Virtual Education Rotation (ROVER) 2.0, a supplementary virtual educational curriculum created for radiation oncology residents globally. A prospective cohort of residents completed surveys before and after the live virtual webinar sessions (pre- and post-surveys, respectively). Live sessions were structured as complex gray-zone cases across various core disease sites. Resident demographics and responses were summarized using means, standard deviations, and proportions. Nine ROVER sessions were held from October 2020 to June 2021. A total of 1487 registered residents completed the pre-survey, of which 786 attended the live case discussion and 223 completed post-surveys. A total of 479 unique radiation oncology residents (of which 95, n = 19.8%, were international attendees) from 147 institutions (national, n = 81, 55.1%; international, n = 66, 44.9%) participated in the sessions. There was similar participation across post-graduate year (PGY) 2 through 5 (range n = 86 to n = 105). Of the 122 unique resident post-surveys, nearly all reported learning through the virtual structure as "very easy" or "easy" (97.5%, n = 119). A majority rated the ROVER 2.0 educational sessions to be "valuable or "very valuable" (99.2%, n = 121), and the panelists-attendee interaction as "appropriate" (97.5%, n = 119). Virtual live didactics aimed at radiation oncology residents are feasible. These results suggest that the adoption of the ROVER 2.0 curricula may help improve radiation oncology resident education.

Quantifying the value of older adult-specific clinical trials: Post-lumpectomy irradiation among older adults with early-stage breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Although there is increasing interest in conducting cancer clinical trials in older adults, the benefit of such trials is unclear. We aimed to quantify the real-world clinical and economic effects of two phase 3 trials (CALGB 9343 and PRIME II) which showed that post-lumpectomy radiation therapy (RT) improves loco-regional recurrence but makes no improvement in overall survival among older women with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We developed a health-transition model to quantify the incremental clinical and economic outcomes between scenarios with vs. without older adult-specific trial results from a societal perspective between 2004 and 2018. The transition probabilities in the model were mainly derived from the 10-year results of CALGB 9343. The total number of the affected patient population in the US and the change in the probability of omitting post-lumpectomy RT due to the CALGB 9343 and PRIME II results were derived from a retrospective analysis of the SEER registry data for patients with ESBC. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to calculate the 95% credible interval (CR) of the incremental clinical and economic outcomes between the two scenarios.

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2018, 32,936 (95% CR: 31,512, 34,357) fewer patients received post-lumpectomy RT among those aged 70 years or older diagnosed with ESBC in the US and there was a decrease cost of $419 M USD (95% CR: -$238 M, -$689 M) in scenarios with vs. without older adult-specific trial results. The difference in projected life years (1083 years, 95% CI: -2542, 7985) and QALYs (866 years, 95% CI: -2561, 7780) were not significant. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 k/QALY, the probability of older adult-specific trial results generating a positive net monetary benefit was 98%.

DISCUSSION

The CALGB 9343 and PRIME II trial results were associated with a substantial cost-saving in the US society. Our results suggest that older adult-specific clinical trials that demonstrate no survival benefit of an intervention in older adults could be correlated with a significant monetary benefit. Further case studies are needed for different types of older adult-specific trials to understand the value of older adult-specific trials comprehensively.

Incorporating financial toxicity considerations into clinical trial design to facilitate patient-centered decision-making in oncology

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Financial toxicity is increasingly being recognized as an important and devastating consequence of cancer treatment that receives little attention when clinical trials are being designed. There is a significant need to obtain this important information in an era of increasingly expensive anticancer treatments. Patients who are informed of all implications of therapy-efficacy, side effects, cost, and broader financial impact-are able to select the best cancer treatment for themselves.

Prospective Comparison of Hypofractionated Versus Normofractionated Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer: Late Toxicity Results of the Non-Inferiority KOSIMA Trial (ARO2010-3)

Purpose

To compare the late toxicity profile of hypofractionation and normofractionation for whole-breast radiotherapy in breast cancer (BC) patients after conserving surgery.

Methods

Sixty-year-old or older patients with pTis-pT3, pN0-pN1a, M0 BC were recruited and stratified to hypofractionated (arm R-HF) or normofractionated (arm L-NF) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), for right- and left-sided BC, respectively, in this single-center, non-randomized, non-inferiority trial. A boost was allowed if indicated. The primary outcome was the cumulative percentage of patients developing grade III fibrosis, grade I telangiectasia, and/or grade II hyperpigmentation after 2 years, with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 15% increase from an expected 2-year toxicity rate of 20%.

Results

The Median follow-up was 4.93 (0.57-8.65) years for R-HF and 5.02 (0.65-8.72) years for L-NF (p=0.236). The median age was 68 (60-83 and 60-80) years, respectively. In total, 226 patients were recruited (107 for R-HF and 119 for L-NF), with 100 and 117 patients suitable for assessment, respectively. A boost was delivered in 51% and 53% of each arm, respectively. Median PTV volumes were 1013.6 (273-2805) cm3 (R-HF) and 1058.28 (315-2709) cm3 (L-NF, p=0.591). The 2-year primary endpoint rate was 6.1% (95% CI 1.3-11.7, n=5 of 82) and 13.3% (95% CI 7-20.2, n=14 of 105), respectively (absolute difference -7.2%, one-sided 95% CI ∞ to -0.26, favoring R-HF). No local recurrence-free- or overall-survival differences were found.

Conclusion

In this prospective non-randomized study, hypofractionation did not have higher toxicity than normofractionated whole-breast IMRT.

Unwarranted variation in radiation therapy fractionation

The adoption of hypofractionation across multiple tumour sites has been slow despite robust evidence. There is considerable unwarranted variation in practice, both within and between jurisdictions. This has been attributed to inconsistencies in guidelines, physician preference, lack of technology and differing financial incentives. Unwarranted variation in the use of hypofractionation has a tremendous effect on cost to both patients and the healthcare system. This places an unnecessary burden on patients and poorly utilises scarce healthcare resources. A collaborative effort from clinicians, patients, healthcare providers and policymakers is needed to reduce unwarranted variation in practice. This will improve quality of care both for patients and at broader healthcare system level.

Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of 3D-Conformal Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in a Prospective Multicenter Cohort of Patients With Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Simple intensity modulation of radiation therapy reduces acute toxicity compared with 2-dimensional techniques in adjuvant breast cancer treatment, but it remains unknown whether more complex or inverse-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) offers an advantage over forward-planned, 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using prospective data regarding patients receiving adjuvant whole breast radiation therapy without nodal irradiation at 23 institutions from 2011 to 2018, we compared the incidence of acute toxicity (moderate-severe pain or moist desquamation) in patients receiving 3DCRT versus IMRT (either inverse planned or, if forward-planned, using ≥5 segments per gantry angle). We evaluated associations between technique and toxicity using multivariable models with inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting, adjusting for treatment facility as a random effect.

RESULTS

Of 1185 patients treated with 3DCRT and conventional fractionation, 650 (54.9%) experienced acute toxicity; of 774 treated with highly segmented forward-planned IMRT, 458 (59.2%) did; and of 580 treated with inverse-planned IMRT, 245 (42.2%) did. Of 1296 patients treated with hypofractionation and 3DCRT, 432 (33.3%) experienced acute toxicity; of 709 treated with highly segmented forward-planned IMRT, 227 (32.0%) did; and of 623 treated with inverse-planned IMRT, 164 (26.3%) did. On multivariable analysis with inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting, the odds ratio for acute toxicity after inverse-planned IMRT versus 3DCRT was 0.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.91) with conventional fractionation and 0.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.65) with hypofractionation.

CONCLUSIONS

This large, prospective, multicenter comparative effectiveness study found a significant benefit from inverse-planned IMRT compared with 3DCRT in reducing acute toxicity of breast radiation therapy. Future research should identify the dosimetric differences that mediate this association and evaluate cost-effectiveness.

Adoption of Ultrahypofractionated Radiation Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer

Introduction

The first high-quality clinical trial to support ultrahypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (ultra-HF-WBI) for invasive early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) was published in April 2020, coinciding with the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed adoption of ultra-HF-WBI for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and ESBC at our institution after primary trial publication.

Methods and Materials

We evaluated radiation fractionation prescriptions for all patients with DCIS or ESBC treated with WBI from March 2020 to May 2021 at our main campus and regional campuses. Demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from the electronic medical record. Treating physician characteristics were collected from licensure data. Hierarchical logistic regression models identified factors correlated with adoption of ultra-HF-WBI (26 Gy in 5 daily factions [UK-FAST-FORWARD] or 28.5 Gy in 5 weekly fractions [UK-FAST]).

Results

Of 665 included patients, the median age was 61.5 years, and 478 patients (71.9%) had invasive, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Twenty-one physicians treated the included patients. In total, 249 patients (37.4%) received ultra-HF-WBI, increasing from 4.3% (2 of 46) in March-April 2020 to a high of 45.5% (45 of 99) in July-August 2020 (P < .001). Patient factors associated with increased use of ultra-HF-WBI included older age (≥50 years old), low-grade WBI without inclusion of the low axilla, no radiation boost, and farther travel distance (P < .03). Physician variation accounted for 21.7% of variance in the outcome, with rate of use of ultra-HF-WBI by the treating physicians ranging from 0% to 75.6%. No measured physician characteristics were associated with use of ultra-HF-WBI.

Conclusions

Adoption of ultra-HF-WBI at our institution increased substantially after the publication of randomized evidence supporting its use. Ultra-HF-WBI was preferentially used in patients with lower risk disease, suggesting careful selection for this new approach while long-term data are maturing. Substantial physician-level variation may reflect a lack of consensus on the evidentiary standards required to change practice.

Association of the Oncology Care Model with Value-Based Changes in Use of Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Radiation utilization for breast cancer and metastatic bone disease varies in modality, fractionation and cost, despite evidence demonstrating equal effectiveness and consensus recommendations such as Choosing Wisely that advocate for higher value care. We assessed whether the Oncology Care Model (OCM), an alternative payment model for practices providing chemotherapy to patients with cancer, impacted the overall use and value of radiation therapy in terms of Choosing Wisely recommendations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We used CMS administrative data to identify beneficiaries enrolled in traditional fee-for-service Medicare who initiated chemotherapy episodes at OCM and propensity-matched comparison practices. Difference-in-difference (DID) analyses evaluated the effect of OCM on overall use of post-operative radiation for breast cancer, use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and hypofractionation for breast cancer, and fractionation patterns for treatment of metastatic bone disease from breast or prostate cancer. We performed additional analyses stratified by the presence or absence of a radiation oncologist in the practice.

RESULTS

Among 27,859 post-operative breast cancer episodes, OCM had no effect on overall use of radiation therapy following breast surgery (DID percentage point difference=0.4%, 90%CI=-1.7%, 2.4%), or on use of IMRT in this setting (DID=-0.6, 90%CI=-3.1, 2.0). Among 19,366 metastatic bone disease episodes, OCM had no effect on fractionation patterns for palliation of bone metastases (DID for ≤10 fractions=-1.1%, 90%CI-2.6%, 0.4% and DID for single fraction=-0.2%, 90%CI=-1.9%, 1.6%). Results were similar for practices with and without a radiation oncologist. We did not evaluate the effect of OCM on hypofractionated radiation after breast-conserving surgery due to evidence of differential baseline trends.

CONCLUSIONS

OCM had no effect on use of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer, or fractionation patterns for metastatic bone disease. Future payment models directly focused on radiation oncology providers may be better poised to improve the value of radiation oncology care.

The Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium: A Novel Initiative to Improve the Quality of Radiation Oncology Care

PURPOSE

Numerous quality measures have been proposed in radiation oncology, and initiatives to improve access to high-complexity care, quality, and equity are needed. We describe the design and evaluate impact of a voluntary statewide collaboration for quality improvement in radiation oncology initiated a decade ago.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We evaluate compliance before and since implementation of annual metrics for quality improvement, using an observational dataset with information from over 20,000 patients treated in the 28 participating radiation oncology practices. At thrice-yearly meetings, experts have spoken regarding trends within the field and inspired discussions regarding potential targets for quality improvement. Blinded data on practices at various sites have been provided. Following Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines, we describe the approach and measures the program has implemented. To evaluate impact, we compare compliance at baseline and now with active measures using mixed effects regression models with site-level random effects.

RESULTS

Compliance has increased, including use of guideline-concordant hypofractionated radiotherapy, doses to targets/normal tissues, motion management, and consistency in delineating and naming contoured structures (a precondition for quality evaluation). For example, use of guideline-concordant hypofractionation for breast cancer increased from 47% to 97%, adherence to target coverage goals and heart dose limits for dose increased from 46% to 86%, motion assessment in patients with lung cancer increased from 52% to 94%, and use of standard nomenclature increased from 53% to 82% for lung patients and from 80% to 94% for breast patients (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although observational analysis cannot fully exclude secular trends, contextual data revealing slow uptake of best practices elsewhere in the US and qualitative feedback from participants suggests that this initiative has improved the consistency, efficiency, and quality of radiation oncology care in its member practices and may be a model for oncology quality improvement more generally.

Has Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Radiation Therapy Become the Standard of Care in the United States? An Updated Report from National Cancer Database

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND

We aimed to update the previous evaluation of hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) use over time in the United States and factors related to its adoption for patients undergoing a lumpectomy from 2004 to 2016.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among the patients who underwent a lumpectomy, we identified 688,079 patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer and 248,218 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016. We defined HF-WBI as 2.5 to 3.33 Gy/fraction to the breast and conventional fractionated whole-breast irradiation as 1.8 to 2.0 Gy/fraction. We evaluated the trend of HF-WBI use and examined factors associated with HF-WBI use using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among invasive cancer patients, the use of HF-WBI increased exponentially from 0.7% in 2004 to 15.6% in 2013 and then to 38.1% in 2016. Among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ, the use of HF-WBI has increased significantly from 0.42% in 2004 to 13.4% in 2013 and then to 34.3% in 2016. Factors found to be associated with HF-WBI use included age, patient geographical location, race/ethnicity, tumor stage, grade, treating facility type, and volume.

CONCLUSION

HF-WBI use in the United States has more than doubled from 2013 to 2016. Although its use is close to that of conventional fractionated whole-breast irradiation, HF-WBI is still far from the preferred standard of care in the United States. We identified several patient and facility factors that can impact the uptake of HF-WBI treatment. Microabstract Using the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016, we evaluated the trend of hypofractionated whole-breast radiation therapy use and factors associated with use. Use in the United States has more than doubled from 2013 to 2016, but it has not become the standard of care. We identified several patient and facility factors that impact the uptake of hypofractionated whole-breast radiation therapy treatment.

Trends in radiotherapy inpatient admissions in Germany: a population-based study over a 10-year period

Objective

With the increasing complexity of oncological therapy, the number of inpatient admissions to radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy departments might have changed. In this study, we aim to quantify the number of inpatient cases and the number of radiotherapy fractions delivered under inpatient conditions in radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy departments.

Methods

The analysis is founded on data of all hospitalized cases in Germany based on Diagnosis-Related Group Statistics (G-DRG Statistics, delivered by the Research Data Centers of the Federal Statistical Office). The dataset includes information on the main diagnosis of cases (rather than patients) and the performed procedures during hospitalization based on claims of reimbursement. We used linear regression models to analyze temporal trends. The considered data encompass the period from 2008 to 2017.

Results

Overall, the number of patients treated with radiotherapy as inpatients remained constant between 2008 (N = 90,952) and 2017 (N = 88,998). Starting in January 2008, 48.9% of 4000 monthly cases received their treatment solely in a radiation oncology department. This figure decreased to 43.7% of 2971 monthly cases in October 2017. We found a stepwise decrease between December 2011 and January 2012 amounting to 4.3%. Fractions received in radiotherapy departments decreased slightly by 29.3 (95% CI: 14.0–44.5) fractions per month. The number of days hospitalized in radiotherapy departments decreased by 83.4 (95% CI: 59.7, 107.0) days per month, starting from a total of 64,842 days in January 2008 to 41,254 days in 2017. Days per case decreased from 16.2 in January 2008 to 13.9 days in October 2017.

Conclusion

Our data give evidence to the notion that radiotherapy remains a discipline with an important inpatient component. Respecting reimbursement measures and despite older patients with more comorbidities, radiotherapy institutions could sustain a constant number of cases with limited temporal shifts.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-021-01829-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Physician trajectories of abandoning long-course breast radiotherapy and their cost impact

OBJECTIVE

To examine variation in trajectories of abandoning conventionally fractionated whole-breast irradiation (CF-WBI) for adjuvant breast radiotherapy among physician peer groups and the associated cost implications.

DATA SOURCES

Medicare claims data were obtained from the Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse for fee-for-service beneficiaries with breast cancer in 2011-2014.

STUDY DESIGN

We used social network methods to identify peer groups of physicians that shared patients. For each physician peer group in each time period (T1 = 2011-2012 and T2 = 2013-2014), we calculated a risk-adjusted rate of CF-WBI use among eligible women, after adjusting for patient clinical characteristics. We applied a latent class growth analysis to these risk-adjusted rates to identify distinct trajectories of CF-WBI use among physician peer groups. We further estimated potential savings to the Medicare program by accelerating abandonment of CF-WBI in T2 using a simulation model.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

Use of conventionally fractionated whole-breast irradiation was determined from Medicare claims among women ≥ 66 years of age who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Among 215 physician peer groups caring for 16 988 patients, there were four distinct trajectories of abandoning CF-WBI: (a) persistent high use (mean risk-adjusted utilization rate: T1 = 94.3%, T2 = 90.6%); (b) decreased high use (T1 = 81.3%, T2 = 65.3%); (c) decreased medium use (T1 = 60.1%, T2 = 44.0%); and (d) decreased low use (T1 = 31.6%, T2 = 23.6%). Peer groups with a smaller proportion of patients treated at free-standing radiation facilities and a larger proportion of physicians that were surgeons tended to follow trajectories with lower use of CF-WBI. If all physician peer groups had practice patterns in T2 similar to those in the "decreased low use" trajectory, the Medicare program could save $83.3 million (95% confidence interval: $58.5 million-$112.2 million).

CONCLUSIONS

Physician peer groups had distinct trajectories of abandoning CF-WBI. Physician composition and setting of radiotherapy were associated with the different trajectories. Distinct practice patterns across the trajectories had important cost implications.

Radiation Oncologists' Views on Breast Radiation Therapy Guidelines: Utilizing an Online Q&A Platform to Assess Current Views on Whole-Breast Irradiation Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Poor adherence to the 2011 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based guideline on whole-breast irradiation (WBI) has been reported. We utilized theMednet to assess the views of the updated 2018 guideline among radiation oncologists (ROs).

METHODS

We identified 11 questions asked by community ROs on theMednet, a web-based platform, between October 27, 2014 and May 2, 2017 that were updated in the 2018 guideline. New answers provided by senior authors of the 2018 guideline, cited guidelines, and polls to survey ROs were disseminated in 3 theMednet's newsletters between March 16, 2018 and May 1, 2018. Any question with less than 60% consensus was resubmitted on October 9, 2019 and assessed on February 13, 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 792 ROs responded to the initial surveys. In each survey, the answer choice(s) that received the majority of the votes aligned with the 2018 guideline. The strongest consensus was for the use of hypofractionated (HF)-WBI regardless of histology (97%), followed by HF-WBI boost dose (92%), molecular subtype (90%), grade (88%), and concurrent use of trastuzumab (87%). The least consensus was for age at which HF-WBI should be offered with 53% of respondents, specifically 73% of academic ROs versus 47% of community ROs (P = .001), agreeing with the guideline. The re-submitted survey 19 months later showed 77% of 287 new respondents now agreed with the guideline regarding age.

CONCLUSION

The majority of ROs concur with the 2018 WBI guideline in theMednet surveys, with better agreement among academic ROs than community ROs for certain components of the guideline. Further research into the different practice patterns may optimize patient care.

Hypofractionated volumetric-modulated arc therapy for breast cancer: A propensity-score-weighted comparison of radiation-related toxicity

We assessed the clinical benefit of combining volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF-RT) considering the incidence of radiation-related toxicities. After a retrospective review for breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant RT between 2005 and 2017, a total of 4209 patients treated with three-dimensional conventional fractionation (CF-3D, 50.4 Gy/28 fractions) and 1540 patients treated with HF-RT (768 received HF-3D; 772, HF-VMAT; 40 Gy/15 fractions) were included. A total of 2229 patients (38.8%) received regional node irradiation (RNI): 1642 (39.0%), 167 (21.7%) and 420 (54.4%) received RNI via CF-3D, HF-3D and HF-VMAT, respectively. Acute/subacute and late toxicities were evaluated. Propensity scores were calculated via logistic regression. Grade 2+ acute/subacute toxicities was the highest in CF-3D group (15.0%, 2.6% and 1.6% in CF-3D, HF-3D and HF-VMAT, respectively; P < .001). HF-VMAT reduced Grade 2+ acute/subacute toxicities significantly compared to CF-3D (odds ratio [OR] 0.11, P < .001) and HF-3D (OR 0.45, P = .010). The 3-year cumulative rate of late toxicities was 18.0% (20.1%, 10.9% and 13.4% in CF-3D, HF-3D and HF-VMAT, respectively; P < .001). On sensitivity analysis, the benefit of HF-VMAT was high in the RNI group. Acute and late toxicities were fewer after HF-VMAT than after HF-3D or CF-3D, especially in women who underwent RNI.

Choosing Wisely in radiation therapy for breast cancer: Time lag in adoption of hypofractionated radiation therapy in Victoria

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the adoption of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) for breast cancer (BC) in Victoria, Australia.

METHODS

This is a population-based cohort of women with BC who had breast RT as captured in the Victorian Radiotherapy Minimum Data Set between 2012 and 2017. We defined HFRT as < 25 fractions of RT. The pattern of HFRT use over time was evaluated with the Cochrane-Armitage test for trend. Factors associated with HFRT were identified using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

12,717 women were included in the study. Overall, 6,653 (52%) patients had HFRT. HFRT use increased from 35% in 2012 to 66% in 2017 (P-trend < 0.001). Older women were more likely to have HFRT (74% for women aged ≥ 70 years vs. 27% for women aged < 50 years; P < 0.001). Women who had nodal irradiation were less likely to have HFRT compared with those who did not (13% vs. 57%; P < 0.001). HFRT use was more common in public than private institutions (57% vs. 46%, P < 0.001), and in metropolitan than regional centres (54% vs. 46%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, the progressive increase in HFRT use over time was independent of other covariates - women treated in 2017 were 7.3 times (95% CI = 6.3-8.6, P < 0.001) more likely to be treated with HFRT than in 2012. Age at RT, nodal irradiation, area of residence and institutional type and locations were all independently associated with HFRT use.

CONCLUSION

This large Australian contemporary population-based study demonstrates increasing use of HFRT for BC. However, large sociodemographic and institutional provider-related variations in practice still exist.

Examining the Financial Impact of Altered Fractionation in Breast Cancer: An Analysis Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing

PURPOSE

Value-based care is increasingly informing treatment decisions in radiation oncology. Although reimbursement differences have been examined for accelerated whole breast irradiation (AWBI) and conventional whole breast irradiation (CWBI), the cost of care delivery is poorly understood. This article describes our experience evaluating costs for altered fractionation in early-stage breast cancer using a time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) model.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Process maps were developed for 2 treatment regimens, AWBI (42.5 Gy in 16 fractions + 10 Gy in 4 fractions boost) and CWBI (50 Gy in 25 fractions + 10 Gy in 5 fractions boost). Cost was determined based on aggregate cost of personnel, materials, equipment, space, and utilities per unit time and based on the relative proportion of capacity used. The total reimbursement for each regimen was calculated as the aggregate of all billable events during a course of radiation therapy, based on the 2019 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services physician fee schedule database.

RESULTS

The total cost of delivering courses of AWBI and CWBI was $6965 and $9267, respectively, a difference of $2302 (25%). Eighty-six percent of this difference was related to a lower cost of delivering daily treatments. The total reimbursement for AWBI or CWBI was $9665 or $12,908, respectively, a difference of $3243 (25%). Overall, 55% to 60% of total costs were related to personnel, with the remainder related to materials, utilities, space, and equipment.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis shows how TDABC can be used to evaluate resource requirements for different radiation therapy fractionation schedules. We found a substantially lower cost for AWBI compared with CWBI, primarily resulting from fewer daily treatments. As the emphasis in health care shifts toward value-based care, TDABC can help identify opportunities to reduce costs and increase clinical efficiency.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy in the real-world setting: An international ESTRO-GIRO survey

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Multiple large trials have established the non-inferiority of hypofractionated radiotherapy compared to conventional fractionation. This study will determine real-world hypofractionation adoption across different geographic regions for breast, prostate, cervical cancer, and bone metastases, and identify barriers and facilitators to its use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anonymous, electronic survey was distributed from January 2018 through January 2019 to radiation oncologists through the ESTRO-GIRO initiative. Predictors of hypofractionation were identified in univariable and multivariable regression analyses.

RESULTS

2316 radiation oncologists responded. Hypofractionation was preferred in node-negative breast cancer following lumpectomy (82·2% vs. 46·7% for node-positive; p < 0.001), and in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (57·5% and 54·5%, respectively, versus 41·2% for high-risk (p < 0.001)). Hypofractionation was used in 32·3% of cervix cases in Africa, but <10% in other regions (p < 0.001). For palliative indications, hypofractionation was preferred by the majority of respondents. Lack of long-term data and concerns about local control and toxicity were the most commonly cited barriers. In adjusted analyses, hypofractionation was least common for curative indications amongst low- and lower-middle-income countries, Asia-Pacific, female respondents, small catchment areas, and in centres without access to intensity modulated radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Significant variation was observed in hypofractionation across curative indications and between regions, with greater concordance in palliation. Using inadequate fractionation schedules may impede the delivery of affordable and accessible radiotherapy. Greater regionally-targeted and disease-specific education on evidence-based fractionation schedules is needed to improve utilization, along with best-case examples addressing practice barriers and supporting policy reform.

Travel, Treatment Choice, and Survival Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Analysis

Background: Travel distance to care facilities may shape urban-rural cancer survival disparities by creating barriers to specific treatments. Guideline-supported treatment options for women with early stage breast cancer involves considerations of breast conservation and travel burden: Mastectomy requires travel for surgery, whereas breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) requires travel for both surgery and RT. This provides a unique opportunity to evaluate the impact of travel distance on surgical decisions and receipt of guideline-concordant treatment. Materials and Methods: We included 61,169 women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer between 2004 and 2013 from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Driving distances to the nearest radiation facility were calculated by using Google Maps. We used multivariable regression to model treatment choice as a function of distance to radiation and Cox regression to model survival. Results: Women living farthest from radiation facilities (>50 miles vs. <10 miles) were more likely to undergo mastectomy versus BCS (odds ratio [OR]: 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-1.79). Among only those who underwent BCS, women living farther from radiation facilities were less likely to receive guideline-concordant RT (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.32-2.23). These guideline-discordant women had worse overall (hazards ratio [HR]: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.42-1.57) and breast-cancer specific survival (HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.29-1.60). Conclusions: We report two breast cancer treatments with different clinical and travel implications to show the association between travel distance, treatment decisions, and receipt of guideline-concordant treatment. Differential access to guideline-concordant treatment resulting from excess travel burden among rural patients may contribute to rural-urban survival disparities among cancer patients.

Use of a Radiation Tumor Bed Boost After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Whole-Breast Irradiation: Time Trends and Correlates

PURPOSE

We sought to evaluate time trends and correlates of the use of a radiation tumor bed boost (TBB) after breast-conserving surgery and either conventional or hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (CWBI or HWBI) for patients with early stage breast cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2016. We evaluated the utilization of TBB before and after publication of the Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology margin guidelines in relation to sociodemographic variables, treatment facility, tumor characteristics, and whole-breast fractionation.

RESULTS

The population included 380,387 patients, of whom 76.7% received a TBB. Utilization of TBB decreased over time (2012-2013: 79.2%; 2014: 76.6%; 2015-2016: 74.7%; P < .001); this was seen for most subgroups evaluated. Rates of TBB differed by facility type and region. There was a decrease in TBB use in patients treated with CWBI over time (2012-2013: 84.9%; 2014: 83.5%; 2015-2016: 82.3%; P < .001) but an increase among patients treated with HWBI (2012-2013: 55.5%; 2014: 60.7%; 2015-2016: 65.1%; P < .001); this was also seen for low-risk patients (age >70 years, negative margins). Among patients undergoing HWBI, TBB was more frequently used when 15 fractions were used compared with 16 fractions (76.8% vs 59.1%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of TBB decreased over time, coinciding with the publication of new margin guidelines, for patients receiving CWBI and those with negative margins, but TBB use increased for patients treated with HWBI. Hence, fractionation regimen is a critical variable in analyzing changes over time in the practice patterns of TBB.

Hypofractionated Prostate Radiation Therapy: Adoption and Dosimetric Adherence Through Clinical Pathways in an Integrated Oncology Network

PURPOSE

Updates to consensus guidelines in October 2018 recommending moderately hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy (mHF-EBRT) in prostate cancer lagged several years after publication of evidence supporting its efficacy. In January 2018, we amended our prostate cancer clinical pathway (CP) to facilitate adoption of mHF-EBRT. Herein, we analyze patterns of care and changes in mHF-EBRT use after the CP modification.

METHODS

Our prostate CP was amended in January 2018 to make mHF-EBRT the recommended treatment for patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer pursuing curative EBRT monotherapy. Normal-tissue dose constraints accompanied the CP modification to guide planning. Use of mHF-EBRT from 2015 to 2017 was compared with use in 2018 after the CP modification, using the Cochran-Armitage test for trend. Predictors of mHF-EBRT use and adherence to dose constraints were analyzed with binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

In 560 patients treated with EBRT monotherapy, mHF-EBRT use increased from 3.7% in 2015-2017 to 85.6% in 2018 (P < .001), whereas conventionally fractionated EBRT (CF-EBRT) use decreased from 96.3% to 14.4% (P < .001). Consultation year of 2018 (odds ratio [OR], 214.6; 95% CI, 94.5 to 484.6; P < .001), treatment at an academic facility (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.8 to 11.3; P = 0.001), and having a smaller prostate (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.00; P = .028) predicted for mHF-EBRT use. At least five of six recommended bladder and rectal dose constraints were met in 89.4% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Modification of our prostate cancer CP, in concert with institutional policies to monitor and audit CP compliance, facilitated rapid adoption of mHF-EBRT in our large, integrated cancer center with good adherence to dosimetric constraints.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Women with Breast Cancer and Supraclavicular Nodal Metastases

BACKGROUND

In 2002, breast cancer patients with supraclavicular nodal metastases (cN3c) were downstaged from AJCC stage IV to IIIc, prompting management with locoregional treatment. We sought to estimate the impact of multimodal therapy on overall survival (OS) in a contemporary cohort of cN3c patients.

METHODS

Women ≥ 18 years with cT1-T4c/cN3c invasive breast cancer who underwent systemic therapy were identified from the 2004-2016 National Cancer Database. We compared three patient cohorts: (a) cN3c + multimodal therapy (systemic therapy, surgery, and radiation); (b) cN3c + non-standard therapy; and, (c) cM1. Logistic regression identified factors associated with receipt of multimodal therapy and Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate unadjusted OS. The Cox proportional hazards model estimated effects of diagnosis and treatment on OS after adjustment.

RESULTS

Overall, 1827 (3.7%) patients with cN3c disease and 46,919 (96.3%) cM1 patients were identified. Of cN3c patients, 74.5% (n = 1362) received multimodal therapy and 25.5% (n = 465) received non-standard therapy; receipt of multimodal therapy was associated with improved 5-year OS (multimodal: 59% vs. M1: 28% vs. non-standard: 28%, log-rank p < 0.001). Adjusting for covariates, non-standard therapy was associated with an increased risk of death compared with receipt of multimodal therapy (HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.71-2.83, p < 0.001). Private insurance was the only patient characteristic associated with a greater likelihood of receiving multimodal therapy (OR 2.81; 95% CI, 1.64-4.82; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Women with cN3c breast cancer who received multimodal therapy demonstrated improved overall survival when compared with patients undergoing non-standard therapy and those with metastatic (M1) disease. Although selection bias may contribute to worse overall survival among cN3c patients undergoing non-standard therapy, national guidelines should encourage locoregional treatment in carefully selected patients.

Utilization of Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Radiotherapy With Concurrent Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Hypofractionated radiotherapy (Hypo-RT) is now considered the standard of care for the majority of patients receiving whole-breast irradiation (WBI). However, there are few data on the use of Hypo-RT in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive patients receiving concurrent anti-HER2 therapy. In this study, we sought to examine patterns of WBI in HER2-positive patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the National Cancer Data Base, we identified women with nonmetastatic HER2-positive breast cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 who received WBI. The Hypo-RT group was defined as those receiving 21 or fewer fractions. All other patients were in the conventional radiotherapy (RT) group. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of Hypo-RT utilization. Five-year overall survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The study included 15,776 patients, of whom 17.7% received Hypo-RT. The rate of Hypo-RT utilization increased from 7.4% in 2010 to 29.3% in 2015 (P = .004). Predictors of Hypo-RT use included older age (≥60 vs. < 60 years), higher median income quartile, further distance from the treatment facility (>50 vs. ≤50 miles), treatment at an academic facility, and later year of diagnosis. Unadjusted 5-year overall survival rates were similar among patients who received Hypo-RT and conventional RT (93.9% vs. 95.2%, P = .26). After adjusting for patient, facility, and tumor variables, Hypo-RT was not significantly associated with survival.

CONCLUSION

Although Hypo-RT was not commonly delivered in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, the utilization rate quadrupled over the study period. Multiple socioeconomic and clinical predictors of Hypo-RT receipt were identified. Adjuvant RT regimen was not significantly associated with overall survival.

Variation in the use of radiotherapy fractionation for breast cancer: Survival outcome and cost implications

•

We evaluated the use of hypofractionation in breast radiotherapy in an Australian population-based cohort.

•

Hypofractionation appears underused for breast radiotherapy in Australia over time.

•

Variation in practice were observed by patient, tumour, sociodemographic and geographical factors.

•

This study highlights that evidence-based practice will translate to reduced health care treatment costs.

Background and purpose

Substantial variation in the adoption of hypofractionation for breast radiation therapy has been observed, despite the availability of consensus guidelines. This study aimed to investigate the variation in radiation therapy fractionation in breast cancer patients in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, and to estimate survival outcome and cost implications.

Materials and methods

This is a population-based cohort of patients who received radiation therapy for breast cancer (2009–2013), as captured in the NSW Central Cancer Registry. A logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with fractionation type. Survival outcome was estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Cost per treatment and potential cost saving associated with evidence-based fractionation was estimated.

Results

A total of 10,482 patients were available for analysis, divided into 3 cohorts (breast alone: N = 7000; breast + nodes: N = 1119; all chestwall: N = 2363). In multivariable analysis, increasing age, laterality (right), year of treatment (2013), early stage, lower socioeconomic status, and regional area of residence were independent predictors of hypofractionation for breast alone radiation therapy. For the breast + nodes and chest wall cohorts, common factors that predicted the use of hypofractionation were increasing age. In multivariable survival analysis, there was no difference between the fractionation regimens at 5 years. Estimated radiation therapy cost of this cohort approximated $52.1 million, compared with $38.5 million had these patients been treated with evidence-based fractionation. This demonstrated a potential saving of $13.6 million.

Conclusion

Hypofractionation appears underused for breast radiation therapy in NSW over time. This study highlights that evidence-based practice will translate to reduced health care treatment costs.

Understanding American Indian Perceptions Toward Radiation Therapy

Many American Indian (AI) and Alaska native (AN) patients do not complete guideline-concordant cancer care for the 4 most common cancers. Our aim was to better understand AI/AN attitudes toward radiation therapy (RT). Patients eligible for this survey study were AI/AN patients with cancer at the Phoenix Indian Medical Center who either received previous RT or were recommended to receive RT. An 18-item questionnaire was administered to each of the 50 participants from October 1, 2018, through February 15, 2019. Willingness to travel for RT was compared to respondent characteristics, concerns regarding RT, and obstacles to obtain RT. Duration of RT was important to 78% of patients: 24% would consider traveling 25 miles or more for a standard course, and 48% would travel that distance for a shorter course (P < .001). The top-ranked barriers to RT were transportation, cost of treatment, and insurance compatibility. The top-ranked concerns about RT were adverse effects, cost of treatment, and fear of RT. Concerns about adverse effects were associated with the radiation team's inability to explain the treatment (P = .05). Transportation concerns were significantly associated with accessibility (P = .02), communication with the RT team (P = .02), and fear of RT (P = .04). AI/AN patients are concerned about the adverse effects of RT and the logistics of treatment, particularly costs, transportation, and insurance compatibility. Use of culturally specific education and hypofractionation regimens may increase acceptance of RT for AI/AN patients with cancer, and this hypothesis will be tested in a future educational intervention-based study.

Acute radiation-induced skin toxicity in hypofractionated vs. conventional whole-breast irradiation: An objective, randomized multicenter assessment using spectrophotometry

PURPOSE

Radiation dermatitis represents one of the most frequent side effects in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant whole-breast irradiation (WBI). Whether hypofractionated WBI induces comparable or less acute radiation-induced skin reactions than conventional WBI is still not fully clarified, as randomized evidence and objective assessments are limited. The aim of this study was to objectively determine frequency and severity of acute radiation-induced skin reactions during hypofractionated vs. conventionally fractionated adjuvant WBI.

METHODS

In this randomized multicenter study, a total of 140 breast cancer patients underwent either hypofractionated or conventional WBI following breast-preserving surgery. Maximum radiation dermatitis severity was assessed at completion and during follow-up by physician-assessed CTCAE v4.03 and the patient-reported RISRAS scale. Additionally, photospectrometric skin readings were performed to objectify skin color differences between both treatment arms.

RESULTS

Radiation dermatitis severity was significantly lower in patients receiving hypofractionation compared with conventional fractionation (mean 1.05 vs. 1.43, p = .024). Grade 0 radiation dermatitis occurred in 21.43% vs. 4.28%, grade ≥2 in 27.14% vs. 42.91% and grade ≥3 in 0% vs. 4.34% of patients following hypofractionated and conventional WBI, respectively. Objective photospectrometric measurements (n = 4200) showed both decreased erythema severity (p = .008) and hyperpigmentation (p = .002) in the hypofractionation arm. Patients allocated to hypofractionated WBI also reported less pain (p = .006), less hyperpigmentation (p = <0.001) and less limitations of day-to-day activities (p = <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Physician and patient-assessed toxicity scorings as well as objective photospectrometric skin measurements revealed that hypofractionated WBI yielded lower rates and severity of acute radiation-induced skin toxicity.

Comparing Survival Outcomes and Costs Associated With Radical Cystectomy and Trimodal Therapy for Older Adults With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Importance

Radical cystectomy is the guidelines-recommended treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, but a resurgence of trimodal therapy has occurred. Limited comparative data are available on outcomes and costs attributable to these 2 treatments.

Objective

To compare the survival outcomes and costs between trimodal therapy and radical cystectomy in older adults with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-based cohort study used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database. A total of 3200 older adults (aged ≥66 years) with clinical stage T2 to T4a bladder cancer diagnosed from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2011, and with claims data available through December 31, 2013, were included in the analysis. Patients who received radical cystectomy underwent either only surgery or surgery in combination with radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Patients who received trimodal therapy underwent transurethral resection of the bladder followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Propensity score matching by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics was used. Data analysis was performed from August 1, 2017, to March 11, 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model and the Fine and Gray competing risk model. All Medicare health care costs for inpatient, outpatient, and physician services within 30, 90, and 180 days of treatment were compared. The total amount spent nationwide was estimated, using 180-day medical costs between treatments, by the total number of new cases of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the United States in 2011.

Results

Of the 3200 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 2048 (64.0%) were men and 1152 (36.0%) were women, with a mean (SD) age of 75.8 (6.0) years. After propensity score matching, 687 patients (21.5%) underwent trimodal therapy and 687 patients (21.5%) underwent radical cystectomy. Patients who underwent trimodal therapy had significantly decreased overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.31-1.69) and cancer-specific survival (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.32-1.83). No differences in costs at 30 days were observed between trimodal therapy ($15 233 in 2002 vs $18 743 in 2011) and radical cystectomy ($17 990 in 2002 vs $21 738 in 2011). However, median total costs were significantly higher with trimodal therapy than with radical cystectomy at 90 days ($80 174 vs $69 181; median difference, $8964; Hodges-Lehmann 95% CI, $3848-$14 079) and at 180 days ($179 891 vs $107 017; median difference, $63 771; Hodges-Lehmann 95% CI, $55 512-$72 029). Extrapolating these figures to the total US population revealed $335 million in excess spending for trimodal therapy compared with the less costly radical cystectomy ($492 million) for patients who received a muscle-invasive bladder cancer diagnosis in 2011.

Conclusions and Relevance

Trimodal therapy was associated with significantly decreased overall survival and cancer-specific survival as well as $335 million in excess spending in 2011. These findings have important health policy implications regarding the appropriate use of high value-based care among older adults with invasive bladder cancer who are candidates for either radical cystectomy or trimodal therapy.

Temporal impact of the publication of guidelines and randomised evidence on the adoption of hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Clinical data supporting the use of hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy (HF-WBRT) in early-stage breast cancer patients have accumulated over the last decade. Despite the availability of the published evidence, the adoption rate of HF-WBRT has been slower-than-expected. We sought to assess the temporal impact of the publication of the guidelines and randomised evidence on the practice pattern of HF-WBRT and identify clinical predictors of its utilisation.

METHODS

Women with early-stage breast cancer who received adjuvant WBRT at Canberra Health Services between 2008 and 2016 were identified from clinical databases. The patterns of HF-WBRT use were analysed in relation to pre-specified time periods (before and after the guideline publications) in the entire cohort as well as in a patient subset fulfilling the criteria for HF-WBRT according to the guidelines (referred to as 'guideline-endorsed subset'). The impact of clinical variables, treating clinicians and the time periods on the adoption of HF-WBRT was assessed by hierarchical multivariate logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Of the entire cohort (n = 1171), the guideline-endorsed subset constituted 51.6% (n = 604) of the patients. HF-WBRT was utilised in 32.8% of the entire cohort and 46.2% of the guideline-endorsed subset. Between 2008 and 2016, HF-WBRT use rate increased from 12.1% to 56.6% in a non-linear pattern. Release of international and local consensus guidelines significantly correlated with the increase in HF-WBRT utilisation rate. The use of chemotherapy and/or tumour bed boost radiotherapy (TBBR), chest wall sepJMIROtion distance (CWSD) and patient age were significant predictors of HF-WBRT use on multivariate analyses. After factoring in the effects of individual clinicians and the time periods on hierarchical multivariate analyses, the use of chemotherapy, TBBR, and CWSD remained as significant variables. Clinicians contributed to the variability in the HF-WBRT adoption pattern.

CONCLUSION

The temporal uptake pattern and the predictors of adjuvant HF-WBRT use in early breast cancer patients largely reflected the accumulating clinical evidence and the publication of the consensus guidelines. This study identified potentially modifiable factors associated with slower-than-expected uptake rate of HF-WBRT. Understanding why there is variability in clinicians' readiness to adopt the abbreviated treatment despite the availability of advanced radiotherapy techniques and the updated evidence is an important step towards formulating effective strategies to optimise the radiotherapeutic management of this common malignancy.

Influence of Radiation Dose to Reconstructed Breast Following Mastectomy on Complication in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction

Purpose: This study investigated the association between radiation dose and complication rate in patients who underwent breast reconstruction to understand the role of radiation hypofractionated regimen, boost radiation therapy (RT), and RT techniques.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 75 patients treated with post-mastectomy adjuvant RT for breast cancer in the setting of two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction. Near maximum radiation dose (D_max) in the 2 or 0.03 cc of reconstructed breast or overlying breast skin was obtained from dose-volume histograms.

Results: Post-RT complications occurred in 22.7% of patients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that all near D_max parameters were able to predict complication risk, which retained statistical significance after adjusting other variables (odds ratio 1.12 per Gy, 95% confidence interval 1.02–1.23) with positive dose-response relationship. In multiple linear regression model (R² = 0.92), conventional fractionation (β = 11.7) and 16 fractions in 2.66 Gy regimen (β = 3.9) were the major determinants of near D_max compared with 15 fractions in 2.66 Gy regimen, followed by utilization of boost RT (β = 3.2). The effect of bolus and dose inhomogeneity seemed minor (P > 0.05). The location of hot spot was not close to the high density metal area of the expander, but close to the surrounding areas of partially deflated expander bag.

Conclusions: This study is the first to demonstrate a dose-response relationship between risk of complications and near D_max, where hypofractionated regimen or boost RT can play an important role. Rigorous RT-quality assurance program and modification of dose constraints could be considered as a critically important component for ongoing trials of hypofractionation. Based on our findings, we initiated a multi-center retrospective study (KROG 18-04) and a prospective study (NCT03523078) to validate our findings.

Downstream Effect of a Proton Treatment Center on an Academic Medical Center

PURPOSE

To quantify the effects of opening a proton center (PC) on an academic medical center (AMC)/radiation oncology department.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Radiation treatment volume and relative value units from fiscal year 2015 (FY15) to FY17 were retrospectively analyzed at the AMC and 2 community-based centers. To quantify new patient referrals to the AMC, we reviewed the electronic medical record for all patients seen at the PC since consults were initiated in November 2015 (n = 1173). Patients were excluded if the date of entry into the AMC electronic medical record predated their PC consultation. Hospital resource use and professional and technical charges were obtained for these patients. Academic growth, philanthropy, and resident education were evaluated based on grant submissions, clinical trial enrollment, philanthropy, and pediatric case exposure, respectively, from PC opening through FY17.

RESULTS

From FY15 to FY17, radiation fractions at the AMC and the 2 community sites decreased by 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12%-16%, P < .001) and increased by 19% (95% CI, 16%-23%, P < .001) and 2% (95% CI, -1.1 to 4.3%, P = NS), respectively; the number of new starts decreased by 3% (95% CI, -13% to 7%, P = NS) and 2% (95% CI, -20% to 16%, P = NS) and increased by 13% (95% CI -2% to 27%, P = NS), respectively. At the AMC, technical and professional relative value units decreased by 5% and 14%, respectively. The PC made 561 external referrals to the AMC, which resulted in $2.38 million technical and $2.13 million professional charges at the AMC. Fifteen grant submissions ($12.83 million) resulted in 6 awards ($3.26 million). Twenty-two clinical trials involving proton therapy were opened, on which a total of 5% (n = 54) of patients enrolled during calendar years 2017 and 2018. The PC was involved in gift donations of $1.6 million. There was a nonsignificant 37% increase in number of pediatric cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a slight decline in AMC photon patient volumes and relative value units, a positive downstream effect was associated with the addition of a PC, which benefited the AMC.

Trends in utilization of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HF-WBI) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): a national cancer database (NCDB) analysis

PURPOSE

We sought to identify trends over time with respect to the use of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HF-WBI) in women with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the national cancer database (NCDB).

METHODS

Trends in utilization of HF-WBI in women diagnosed with T1-2N0 TNBC in the NCDB between 2008 and 2013 were analyzed. Case-matched luminal A women were used for comparison. Variables included age, race, year of diagnosis, insurance status, income quartile, receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and institution (academic vs. community). Chi square, logistic regression, and multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Utilization of HF-WBI among the 53,269 TNBC women identified steadily increased from 4.7% in 2008 to 14.0% in 2013 for women with TNBC compared to luminal A cancer whose utilization increased from 7.3 to 23.3% over the same time frame (p < 0.001). On univariate analysis, HF-WBI was associated with increasing age (p < 0.001), Medicare insurance (p < 0.001), race (p = 0.041), diagnosis after 2011 (p < 0.001), higher income quartile (p < 0.001), and treatment at academic institutions (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, age (p < 0.001, OR 1.038 per year), income quartile (p = 0.002, OR 1.061 per increase in quartile), treatment at an academic institution (p < 0.001, OR 1.78) significantly increased use of HF-WBI.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment at an academic center and year of diagnosis were most correlated with increased HF-WBI in T1-2N0 TNBC women in the NCDB from 2008 to 2013, followed by increasing age and income. Only 14% of T1-2N0 TNBC women received HF-WBI in 2013. Focus on increased utilization is needed for non-academic centers, lower income, and younger women.

Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation in Large-Breasted Women-Is There a Dosimetric Predictor for Acute Skin Toxicities?

PURPOSE

Underutilization of hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) in large-breasted women may be partially explained by concerns about dose heterogeneity. Although modern planning may mitigate this issue, validated dosimetric guidelines are lacking. Our clinical pathway mandates hypofractionation, guided by institutional dosimetric criteria for plan evaluation. We examined acute radiation dermatitis rates with HF-WBI in large-breasted patients when our guidelines are followed and evaluated factors predictive for dermatitis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with whole-breast clinical target volumes (WB-CTV) of ≥1000 cm3 treated with HF-WBI were reviewed. WB-CTV V105, V107, and V110 were assessed. Our guidelines recommend limiting V105 to <10% to 15% and V110 to 0%. The highest grade of acute dermatitis was recorded. Potential clinical and dosimetric predictors of dermatitis were analyzed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2017, 505 breasts in 502 patients were treated with HF-WBI. The median WB-CTV was 1261.3 cm3 (interquartile range [IQR], 1115.3-1510.0). Most plans (99%) delivered 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions. A cavity boost of 10 Gy in 4 fractions was delivered in 99% of plans. Electrons were used in 69% of boost plans. Three-dimensional field-in-field technique was used in 68% of plans and inverse-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy in 32%. The median WB-CTV V105 was 9.7% (IQR, 5.6%-13.3%); the median WB-CTV V107 was 0.8% (IQR, 0.0%-2.5%). The WB-CTV V110 was 0% in 97.4% of plans (median, 0.0%; IQR, 0.0%-0.0%). Grade 1, 2, and 3 dermatitis rates were 55.0%, 40.8%, and 3.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, age >64 years (P = .016; odds ratio [OR] 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-12.3), WB-CTV >1500 cm3 (P = .006; OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.5-12.3), body mass index ≥34 (P = .044; OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.0-14.5), and WB-CTV V105 >10% (P = .011; OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.5-19.3) predicted for grade 3 dermatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

With our institutional dosimetric guidelines, grade 3 dermatitis rates with HF-WBI in large-breasted women was <5%. WB-CTV V105 should be optimized to <10% to keep grade 3 dermatitis rates <2%.

Lag Time Between Evidence and Guidelines: Can Clinical Pathways Bridge the Gap?

PURPOSE:

The 2018 American Society for Radiation Oncology guidelines state that hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) may be used for early-stage breast cancer regardless of age, although evidence to support this became available years ago. Before guideline publication, we sought to change the practice pattern within an integrated, comprehensive radiation oncology network using clinical pathways.

METHODS:

The breast clinical pathway was amended in January 2016 to allow HF-WBI as a pathway-concordant option for women younger than 50 years of age. In December 2016, the pathway was amended to mandate HF-WBI as the only pathway-concordant option. Women younger than 50 years of age treated for stage 0 to IIA breast cancer, without irradiation of regional nodes, were included. Potential predictors of hypofractionation use were analyzed using binary logistic regression.

RESULTS:

We identified 305 patients treated between 2013 and 2017. From 2013 to December 2015, HF-WBI use was 4.2%. After the first and second amendments, use increased to 53.1% ( P < .001) and 96.5% ( P < .001), respectively. Before amendment 1, there was no difference in use of hypofractionation at academic (2.6%) versus community (4.7%) sites ( P = .568). After amendment 1, academic practices were more likely to use hypofractionation (72.0% v 44.6%; P = .026). After amendment 2, there was, again, no difference between academic (100.0%) and community (95.3%) practices ( P = .999).

CONCLUSION:

With implementation of a clinical pathway that mandated use of HF-WBI regardless of age, HF-WBI use for women younger than 50 years of age rapidly increased from 4.2% to greater than 95%. Clinical pathways effectively standardize patterns of care to reflect the most up-to-date clinical evidence, independently of guideline publication.

Three-Year Outcomes With Hypofractionated Versus Conventionally Fractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation: Results of a Randomized, Noninferiority Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

The adoption of hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) remains low, in part because of concerns regarding its safety when used with a tumor bed boost or in patients who have received chemotherapy or have large breast size. To address this, we conducted a randomized, multicenter trial to compare conventionally fractionated whole-breast irradiation (CF-WBI; 50 Gy/25 fx + 10 to 14 Gy/5 to 7 fx) with HF-WBI (42.56 Gy/16 fx + 10 to 12.5 Gy/4 to 5 fx).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2011 to 2014, 287 women with stage 0 to II breast cancer were randomly assigned to CF-WBI or HF-WBI, stratified by chemotherapy, margin status, cosmesis, and breast size. The trial was designed to test the hypothesis that HF-WBI is not inferior to CF-WBI with regard to the proportion of patients with adverse cosmetic outcome 3 years after radiation, assessed using the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Scale. Secondary outcomes included photographically assessed cosmesis scored by a three-physician panel and local recurrence-free survival. Analyses were intention to treat.

RESULTS

A total of 286 patients received the protocol-specified radiation dose, 30% received chemotherapy, and 36.9% had large breast size. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Median follow-up was 4.1 years. Three-year adverse cosmetic outcome was 5.4% lower with HF-WBI ( Pnoninferiority = .002; absolute risks were 8.2% [n = 8] with HF-WBI v 13.6% [n = 15] with CF-WBI). For those treated with chemotherapy, adverse cosmetic outcome was higher by 4.1% (90% upper confidence limit, 15.0%) with HF-WBI than with CF-WBI; for large breast size, adverse cosmetic outcome was 18.6% lower (90% upper confidence limit, -8.0%) with HF-WBI. Poor or fair photographically assessed cosmesis was noted in 28.8% of CF-WBI patients and 35.4% of HF-WBI patients ( P = .31). Three-year local recurrence-free survival was 99% with both HF-WBI and CF-WBI ( P = .37).

CONCLUSION

Three years after WBI followed by a tumor bed boost, outcomes with hypofractionation and conventional fractionation are similar. Tumor bed boost, chemotherapy, and larger breast size do not seem to be strong contraindications to HF-WBI.

Local control in young women with early-stage breast cancer treated with hypofractionated whole breast irradiation

OBJECTIVE

To compare local control (LC) in young women with early-stage breast cancer (BC) treated with hypofractionated (HF) whole breast irradiation (WBI) vs conventional fractionation (CF) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Women <50 years with pT1-2N0 BC following BCS treated with WBI, CF (50Gy/25 fractions) or HF (42.4Gy/16 fractions) followed by a tumor bed boost (10-16Gy/5-8 fractions) from 2009 to 2013 were identified from an institutional database. Median follow-up was 5.2 years (range 0.3-8.4). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate 5-year LC. Logistic regression identified factors associated with receipt of CF vs HF WBI.

RESULTS

Of 270 eligible women, 227 (84%) were treated with HF and 43 (16%) with CF WBI. A tumor bed boost of 10 Gy/5 fractions was given in 97% of patients, 53% received adjuvant chemotherapy and 94% (225/239) with estrogen-positive disease received endocrine therapy. Median age was 45 years (range 30-49) in HF and 40 years (range 19-49) in the CF group. The 5-year LC rate was 99.3% (95% CI 97.9-100%, p = 0.495) in the HF and 97.5% (95% CI 92.8-100%) in the CF group. On univariate analysis, age ≤ 40 years or triple negative BC was associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving HF WBI. Only age remained significant on multivariate analysis [OR 2.82 (95% CI 1.45-5.48, p = 0.002)].

CONCLUSIONS

HF WBI was associated with excellent LC rates in this study cohort, comparable to CF WBI. However, CF WBI was more likely to be recommended to women <40 years.

Alternatives to Standard Fractionation Radiation Therapy After Lumpectomy: Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation and Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation

Adjuvant whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after lumpectomy has been an established standard of care for decades. Standard-fractionation WBI delivered over 5 to 7 weeks can achieve durable tumor control with low toxicity but can be inconvenient for patients and cost ineffective. Hypofractionated WBI can be completed in 3 to 4 weeks and, based on long-term randomized data, is the preferred standard of care in select patients. Accelerated partial-breast irradiation can be delivered using even shorter treatment regimens. Although the available data on accelerated partial-breast irradiation is more limited, early results suggest it is an effective alternative to WBI in select patients.