Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Before Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: Retrospective Evaluation of Pathologic Response and Outcomes

Role of Locoregional Therapy on Survival After Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma--Experience from a High-volume Center

Background

Locoregional therapy (LRT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before liver transplantation (LT) has a role in improving the tumor biology and post-LT survival outcome apart from downstaging and bridging. We retrospectively analyzed our database of adult living donor liver transplants (LDLT) for HCC, to compare the survival outcomes in Group-1 (upfront-LT, HCC within Milan/UCSF/AFP<1000 ng/ml) and Group-2 (LT post-LRT, HCC beyond UCSF/irrespective of tumor burden with AFP>1000 ng/ml). We also explored the risk factors for recurrence on follow-up.

Methods

A study group (n = 506, Group-1-348, Group-2 = 158) of patients with HCC who underwent LDLT between July 2006 and December 2022, excluding incidental HCC (n = 42), patients with other histology (n = 13) and in-hospital mortality (n = 43), were analyzed. Study cohort (n = 341), after propensity score matching, was analyzed for survival outcomes (overall survival, OS and disease-free survival, DFS) and risk factors for recurrence between Group-1 (n = 156) and Group-2 (n = 158).

Results

Group-2 exhibited a trend towards better mean OS and DFS compared to Group-1 (OS-133 vs. 107-months, P = NS, DFS-118 vs. 102-months, P = NS). Long-term OS (10-year) for those within Milan and UCSF criteria was superior in Group-2, P = NS. Complete pathological response (cPR) after LRT (46.8%), significantly improved OS and DFS compared to those with partial response and stable disease; 152 vs. 94 vs. 49 months, P = 0.001, and 147 vs. 75 vs. 41 months, P = 0.006, respectively. Recipient age, size of tumor, and pre-LT serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were independent predictors of cPR. Independent risk factors for recurrence included pre-LT AFP, tumors beyond UCSF, perineural invasion, and high-grade tumors.

Conclusion

Locoregional therapy in HCC offers significantly better OS and DFS in those who had a complete pathological response. Risk factors for recurrence post-LT were AFP level, beyond UCSF tumors, and high-grade HCC with PNI on histology.

Advances in radiation therapy for HCC: Integration with liver-directed treatments

HCC is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related mortality with increasing incidence worldwide. Historically, treatment for early disease includes liver transplantation, surgical resection, and/or other local therapies, such as thermal ablation. As a result of technical advances and high-quality prospective data, the use of definitive external beam radiotherapy with ablative doses has emerged. Intermediate-stage disease has been generally addressed with arterially directed therapies (eg, chemoembolization or radioembolization) and external beam radiotherapy, while advanced stages have been addressed by systemic therapy or best supportive care. The role of each local/locoregional therapy has rapidly evolved in the context of novel pharmacotherapies, including immunotherapies and antiangiogenic agents. The combinations, indications, and timing of treatments vary widely among specialties and geographies. Here, we aim to synthesize the best quality evidence available regarding the efficacy and safety of different liver-directed modalities, with a focus on recent prospective clinical data of external beam radiotherapy within the context of other available liver-directed therapies across Barcelona Liver Classification (BCLC) stages.

Advancements in locoregional therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Emerging perspectives on combined treatment strategies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) persists as a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, often diagnosed at advanced stages with limited treatment options. Locoregional therapies (LRTs) are crucial in HCC management, playing significant roles in neoadjuvant and palliative treatments, among others. However, the unique disease background of HCC necessitates multidisciplinary and integrated treatment strategies. The therapeutic landscape for advanced HCC has been significantly broadened by the advent of combined therapies, presenting multiple approaches aimed at improving long-term survival, which remains a critical challenge. This review offers a comprehensive overview of major LRTs for HCC, highlighting recent technological advancements and exploring the challenges and limitations in their application, and presents the latest developments in combination therapies, including combinations between different LRTs and their integration with systemic treatments. Additionally, we outline future directions for the development of integrated treatment modalities for advanced HCC.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in primary liver tumor: Local control, outcomes and toxicities

Objective

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a therapeutic option in the guidelines for liver primaries after standard strategies like surgery or thermoablation have failed. To assess its efficacy and safety, we reviewed all patients treated by SBRT for a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over a six-year period.

Methods and materials

The study included all patients treated by SBRT for HCC between April 2015 and November 2021 in the University Cancer Institute at Toulouse-Oncopole. All patients were inoperable and not eligible for thermoablation, or after a failure. All tumor sizes were included and cirrhosis up to Child-Pugh B was accepted. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment response was assessed using mRECIST criteria. Toxicity was graded using CTCAE (v4.0).

Results

One hundred and nine patients with 118 lesions were treated. Half underwent prior standard treatment. Median dose was 50 Grays in five fractions for most patients. Chronic liver disease represented 90.8 % of cases with a median age of 69 years. Median tumor size was 4.0 cm. Median follow-up was 22.2 months [95 %CI: 15.1-30.4]. LC, OS and PFS at two years were 82.4 % [95 %CI: 71.3; 89.5], 73.2 % [95 %CI: 61.5; 81.8] and 35.8 % [95 %CI: 25.1; 46.7], respectively. Acute toxicities occurred in 20.2 % of patients, including 10.1 % grade 3-4 and 1.8 % grade 5. Late toxicities occurred in 5.5 % of patients including 4.6 % grade 3-4. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was related to digestive perforation or liver failure.

Conclusion

SBRT provides good LC with an acceptable safety profile. It can be used in several settings such as salvage therapy or in combination with validated treatment. Prospective randomized trials are needed to validate SBRT as a standard alternative.

Exploring the Evolving Landscape of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries significant morbidity and mortality. Management of the HCC requires a multidisciplinary approach. Surgical resection and liver transplantation are the gold standard options for the appropriate settings. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising treatment modality in managing HCC; its use is more studied and well-established in advanced HCC (aHCC). Current clinical guidelines universally endorse SBRT as a viable alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), and transarterial radioembolisation (TARE), a recommendation substantiated by literature demonstrating comparable efficacy among these modalities. In early-stage HCC, SBRT primarily manages unresectable tumours unsuitable for ablative procedures such as microwave ablation and RFA. SBRT has been incorporated as a modality to downstage tumours or as a bridge to transplant. In the case of intermediate or advanced HCC, SBRT offers excellent results either as a single modality or adjunct to other locoregional modalities such as TACE/TARE. Recent data from late-stage HCC patients illustrate the effectiveness of SBRT in achieving local tumour control while minimising damage to surrounding healthy liver tissue. It has promising local control of approximately 80-90% in managing HCC. Additional prospective data comparing the efficacy of SBRT with the first-line recommended therapies such as RFA, TACE, and surgery are essential. The standard of care for patients with advanced/metastatic disease is systemic therapy (immunotherapy/tyrosine kinase inhibitors). SBRT, in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors, has an immune-modulatory effect that results in a synergistic effect. Recent findings indicate that the combination of immunotherapy and SBRT in HCC is well-tolerated and exhibits synergistic effects. Further exploration of diverse immunotherapy and radiotherapy strategies is essential to identify the appropriate time for combination treatments and to optimise dose and fraction regimens. Prospective, randomised studies are imperative to establish SBRT as the primary treatment for HCC.

Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Child-Pugh A Versus Child-Pugh B/C Cirrhosis

Purpose

For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a locoregional treatment. Our purpose was to report outcomes in patients with HCC with Child-Pugh A (CP A) versus Child-Pugh B or C (CP B/C) liver dysfunction treated with SBRT.

Methods and Materials

A retrospective analysis of 80 patients with HCC, with a total of 94 tumors treated with SBRT, was conducted at a single institution. Outcomes were compared between patients with CP A (n = 51) and CP B/C (n = 29) liver dysfunction. Outcomes of interest included local control, overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

Results

Median tumor size was 3.2 cm. There were 59 tumors included in the CP A cohort and 35 tumors in the CP B/C cohort. Median radiation dose was 50 Gy in 5 fractions for the CP A cohort and 40 Gy in 5 fractions for the CP B/C cohort. The rates of pathologic complete response were similar between the 2 groups at 63% for the CP A group and 61% for the CP B/C group. The estimated 1-year local control rates were similar between the 2 groups at 93% for the CP A group and 91% for the CP B/C group (P = .59). The 1-year OS for the CP A group was 85%, whereas the 1-year OS for the CP B/C group was 61% (P = .19). There was a 5.9% rate of grade 3+ toxicity in the CP A group and a 20.7% rate of grade 3+ toxicity in the CPB/C group.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that SBRT is feasible and effective in patients with both CP A and CP B/C liver dysfunction with similar rates of local control and pathologic complete response despite lower radiation doses in the CP B/C cohort. In patients with more advanced CP B/C cirrhosis, toxicities were higher and must be weighed against possible treatment benefits. Further studies characterizing the optimal role of SBRT in patients with advanced cirrhosis are warranted.

Expanding Indications for Liver Transplantation in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Improvements in downstaging therapies have expanded the indications for liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients with more advanced disease are now considered candidates due to advancements in radiation therapy, combination therapies, and immunotherapy. Combination stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been shown to be superior to the historic treatment, sorafenib, in patients with macrovascular invasion. These patients are now candidates for LT with stable disease after LRT. Patients with ruptured HCC and prolonged stability have also been shown to have acceptable outcomes. The role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy needs to be further defined and has the potential to further improve tumor control prior to transplant.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Liver Transplant for Liver Cancer: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Importance

Whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a bridge to liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is effective and safe is still unknown.

Objective

To investigate the feasibility of SBRT before deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) for previously untreated unresectable HCC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial conducted between June 1, 2015, and October 18, 2019, 32 eligible patients within UCSF (University of California, San Francisco) criteria underwent dual-tracer (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 11C-acetate [ACC]) positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadoxetate followed by SBRT of 35 to 50 Gy in 5 fractions, and the same imaging afterward while awaiting DDLT. Statistical analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis between October 1 and 31, 2023.

Intervention

Patients received SBRT followed by DDLT when matched deceased donor grafts were available.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Coprimary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates (ORRs) by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), modified RECIST (mRECIST), and PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST). Secondary end points were local control rate, overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

A total of 32 patients (median age, 59 years [IQR, 54-63 years]; 22 men [68.8%]) with 56 lesions received SBRT. After a median follow-up of 74.6 months (IQR, 40.1-102.9 months), the median PFS was 17.6 months (95% CI, 6.6-28.6 months), and the median OS was 60.5 months (95% CI, 29.7-91.2 months). The 5-year PFS was 39.9% (95% CI, 19.9%-59.9%), and the 5-year OS was 51.3% (95% CI, 31.7%-70.9%). In terms of number of patients, ORRs were 62.5% ([n = 20] 95% CI, 54.2%-68.7%) by RECIST 1.1, 71.9% ([n = 23] 95% CI, 63.7%-79.0%) by mRECIST, and 78.1% ([n = 25] 95% CI, 73.2%-86.7%) by PERCIST. In terms of number of lesions, ORRs were 75.0% ([n = 42] 95% CI, 61.6%-80.8%) by RECIST 1.1, 83.9% ([n = 47] 95% CI, 74.7%-90.6%) by mRECIST, and 87.5% ([n = 49] 95% CI, 81.3%-98.6%) by PERCIST. Twenty patients with 36 lesions received DDLT, of whom 15 patients (75.0%) with 21 lesions (58.3%) exhibited pathologic complete response. Multivariable analyses revealed that pretreatment metabolic tumor volume (MTV) based on ACC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06 [95% CI, 1.01-1.10]; P = .01) and complete metabolic response (CMR) by PERCIST (HR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.10-0.96]; P = .04) were associated with PFS, while pretreatment MTV based on ACC (HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.03-1.16]; P = .01), total lesion activity based on ACC (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 1.00-1.02]; P = .02), and CMR by PERCIST (HR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.07-0.73]; P = .01) were associated with OS. Toxic effects associated with SBRT were reported for 9 patients (28.1%), with 1 grade 3 event.

Conclusions and Relevance

This phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial demonstrated promising survival and safety outcomes of SBRT before DDLT for unresectable HCC. Future randomized clinical trials are warranted.

Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)is a common type of liver cancer with a poor prognosis, especially in patients with advanced stages or underlying liver disease. While surgical resection, liver transplantation, and ablation therapies have traditionally been the mainstay of treatment for HCC, radiation therapy has become increasingly recognized as an effective alternative, particularly for those who are not surgical candidates. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) is a highly precise form of radiation therapy that delivers very high doses of radiation to the tumor while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. Several studies have reported favorable outcomes with SBRT in HCC treatment. Moreover, SBRT can be used to treat recurrent HCC after prior treatment, offering a potentially curative approach in select cases. While SBRT has demonstrated its efficacy and safety in treating HCC, future studies are needed to further investigate the potential role of SBRT in combination with other treatments for HCC.

Portal-hypertension features are associated with ascites occurrence and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by external radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We studied the impact of Portal hypertension (PHT) on ascites occurrence and on radiotherapy outcome in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHOD

All cirrhotic patients that received radiotherapy for HCC between 2012 and 2022 were included. Portal hypertension-Score was built using univariate analysis with the presence of esophageal varices (EV), platelet count, history of acute variceal bleeding (AVB) and spleen size. Time-to-events data were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank and Cox-models.

RESULTS

60 patients were included (female 27%, age 67 years-old, Child-Pugh A 82%, alcoholic/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis/hepatitis C virus 55/40/32%). 38% and 15% presented history of ascites and AVB respectively, 25% had large EV, 53.5% presented PHT score ≥ 5. 92% were BCLC-0/A, median tumor size was 30 mm. At 6 months, ascites incidence was 19% and precluded access to further HCC treatment for all patients with HCC recurrence. All PHT parameters included in the score and PHT score ≥ 5 (hazard ratio (HR) = 14.07, p = 0.01) were associated with ascites occurrence. Transplantation free survival and recurrence free survival at 1 year were 56% and 47% respectively. Albi grade 3 (HR = 3.01; p = 0.04) was independently associated with Transplantation free survival.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy should be cautiously performed in patients with PHT score ≥ 5 because of ascites occurrence risk precluding access to further HCC treatments.

Non-Surgical Locoregional Therapies Alone or in Combination with Systemic Therapy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer, representing the third-leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Curative intent treatment options for patients with HCC include liver transplantation, resection and ablation of small lesions. Other potentially curative therapies include cryoablation, microwave ablation and percutaneous alcohol injection. For locally advanced disease, different arterially directed therapies including transarterial chemoembolization and selective internal radiation therapy, plus external beam radiation including three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy and proton beam therapy, are available or studied. Systemic therapies based on checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are available for the management of metastatic HCC and sometimes for locally advanced disease. Combinations of locoregional therapies with systemic drugs are currently the subject of several clinical trials.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

The Current Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

The role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), which can deliver high radiation doses to focal tumors, has greatly increased in not only early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but also in portal vein or inferior vena cava thrombi, thus expanding this therapy to pre-transplantation and the treatment of oligometastases from HCC in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). In early-stage HCC, many promising prospective results of SBRT have been reported, although SBRT is not usually indicated as a first treatment potion in localized HCC according to several guidelines. In the treatment of portal vein or inferior vena cava tumor thrombi, several reports using various dose-fraction schedules have shown relatively good response rates with low toxicities and improved survival due to the rapid advancements in systemic therapy. Although SBRT is regarded as a substitute therapy when conventional bridging therapies to transplantation, such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), are not applicable or fail in controlling tumors, SBRT may offer advantages in patients with borderline liver function who may not tolerate TACE or RFA, according to several reports. For oligometastases, the combination of SBRT with ICI could potentially induce an abscopal effect in patients with HCC, which is expected to provide the rationale for SBRT in the treatment of oligometastatic disease in the near future.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Efficacy and Safety

Simple Summary

This study aimed to describe treatment efficacy and safety in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). In one of the largest retrospective studies to date, we analyzed the data of 318 patients. The median follow-up period was 70.2 months. The local control rate at 24 and 60 months was 94% (91–97%) and 94% (91–97%), respectively. Relapse-free survival at 12, 24, and 60 months was 62% (55–67%), 29% (23–36%), and 13% (8–19%), respectively. OS at 12, 24, and 60 months was 72% (95%CI 67–77%), 44% (38–50%), and 11% (7–15%), respectively. The outcome is highly related to the natural evolution of the underlying cirrhosis. Child-Pugh score B-C, high BCLC score, portal thrombosis, GTV volume, and higher PTV volume reported on total hepatic volume ratio were significantly associated with OS. SBRT is efficient for the management of HCC with a favorable toxicity profile.

Abstract

This study aimed to describe patient characteristics, treatment efficacy, and safety in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We retrospectively analyzed data of 318 patients with 375 HCC treated between June 2007 and December 2018. Efficacy (overall survival [OS], relapse-free survival, and local control) and acute and late toxicities were described. The median follow-up period was 70.2 months. Most patients were treated with 45 Gy in three fractions. The median (range) PTV volume was 90.7 (2.6–1067.6) cc. The local control rate at 24 and 60 months was 94% (91–97%) and 94% (91–97%), respectively. Relapse-free survival at 12, 24, and 60 months was 62% (55–67%), 29% (23–36%), and 13% (8–19%), respectively. OS at 12, 24, and 60 months was 72% (95%CI 67–77%), 44% (38–50%), and 11% (7–15%), respectively. Approximately 51% and 38% experienced acute and late toxicity, respectively. Child-Pugh score B-C, high BCLC score, portal thrombosis, high GTV volume, and higher PTV volume reported on total hepatic volume ratio were significantly associated with OS. SBRT is efficient for the management of HCC with a favorable toxicity profile. The outcome is highly related to the natural evolution of the underlying cirrhosis.

LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy With Radiologic-Pathologic Explant Correlation in Patients With SBRT-Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to evaluate the accuracy of LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm (LR-TRA) for assessing the viability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), using explant pathology as the gold standard.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent SBRT for locoregional treatment of HCC between 2008 and 2019 with subsequent liver transplantation. Five radiologists independently assessed all treated lesions by using the LR-TRA. Imaging and posttransplant histopathology were compared. Lesions were categorized as either completely (100%) or incompletely (<100%) necrotic, and performance characteristics and predictive values for the LR-TR viable and nonviable categories were calculated for each reader. Interreader reliability was calculated using the Fleiss kappa test.

RESULTS

A total of 40 treated lesions in 26 patients (median age, 63 years [interquartile range, 59.4-65.5]; 23 men) were included. For lesions treated with SBRT, sensitivity for incomplete tumor necrosis across readers ranged between 71% and 86%, specificity between 85% and 96%, and positive predictive value between 86% and 92%, when the LR-TR equivocal category was treated as nonviable, accounting for subject clustering. When the LR-TR equivocal category was treated as viable, sensitivity of complete tumor necrosis for lesions treated with SBRT ranged from 88% to 96%, specificity from 71% to 93%, and negative predictive value from 85% to 96%. Interreader reliability was fair (k = 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.33). Although a loss of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) was highly correlated with pathologically nonviable tumor on explant, almost half of the patients with APHE had pathologically nonviable tumor on explant.

CONCLUSIONS

LR-TRA v2018 performs well for predicting complete and incomplete necrosis in HCC treated with SBRT. In contrast to other locoregional therapies, the presence of APHE after SBRT does not always indicate viable tumor and suggests that observation may be an appropriate strategy for these patients.

Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy as a Bridge to Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Preliminary Results of Başkent University Experience

OBJECTIVES

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common primary liver tumor, with curative treatment options being liver transplant and resection. However, approximately 20% to 30% of patients have substantial disease progression while awaiting transplant. Here, we report our initial experience on stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy as a bridge to liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven patients with 9 lesions received stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy as a bridge treatment to transplant. All patients underwent radiofrequency ablation, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, or hepatic resection before stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to evaluate radiographic responses 1 month later.

RESULTS

Median age of patients was 65 years (range, 63-71 years), median stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy dose was 45 Gy (range, 30-54 Gy; delivered in 3-5 fractions), and median tumor diameter was 17 mm (range, 12-30 mm). Before stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy, all patients underwent liver-directed therapies, including transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for 3 lesions, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation for 4 lesions, surgical resection for 1 lesion, and surgical resection plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for the remaining lesion. Patients showed no evidence of gastrointestinal toxicity or radiation-induced liver disease. Acute toxicity was negligible; all patients completed the treatment course. One month after stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy administration, response rates were assessed with magnetic resonance imaging, with complete responses obtained in 5 lesions (55.5%), partial responses for 2 lesions, and stable disease for 2 lesions. No disease progression was shown following stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy application.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy is an effective, safe, and tolerable bridging therapy option. Although we observed an early response after treatment, exact response rates will not be known for at least 3 months following stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy. Thus, our findings should be confirmed through additional prospective studies with longer follow-up.

Approach to Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Child-Pugh B-7 Cirrhosis

OPINION STATEMENT

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with underlying Child-Pugh B-7 cirrhosis benefit from management from an experienced, multidisciplinary team. In patients with localized disease who meet criteria for liver transplant, establishing care at a liver transplant center is crucial. For those awaiting transplant, local bridge therapies have emerged as a strategy to maintain priority status and eligibility. Multiple liver-directed therapies exist to provide locoregional tumor control. The careful selection of locoregional therapy is a multidisciplinary endeavor that takes into account patient factors including tumor resectability, underlying liver function, performance status, previous treatment, tumor location/size, and vascular anatomy to determine the optimal management strategy. Technological advances in external beam radiation therapy have allowed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to emerge in recent years as a versatile and highly effective bridge therapy consisting of typically between 3 and 5 high dose, highly focused, and non-invasive radiation treatments. When treating cirrhotic patients with HCC, preserving liver function is of utmost importance to prevent clinical decline and decompensation. SBRT has been shown to be both safe and effective in carefully selected patients with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis; however, care must be taken to prevent radiation-induced liver disease. This review summarizes the evolving role of SBRT in the treatment of HCC in patients with Child-Pugh B-7 cirrhosis.

External Beam Radiation Therapy for Primary Liver Cancers: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the indications and technique-dose of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC).

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on the indications, techniques, and outcomes of EBRT in HCC and IHC. This guideline is intended to cover the definitive, consolidative, salvage, preoperative (including bridge to transplant), and adjuvant settings as well as palliative EBRT for symptomatic primary lesions. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

Strong recommendations are made for using EBRT as a potential first-line treatment in patients with liver-confined HCC who are not candidates for curative therapy, as consolidative therapy after incomplete response to liver-directed therapies, and as a salvage option for local recurrences. The guideline conditionally recommends EBRT for patients with liver-confined multifocal or unresectable HCC or those with macrovascular invasion, sequenced with systemic or catheter-based therapies. Palliative EBRT is conditionally recommended for symptomatic primary HCC and/or macrovascular tumor thrombi. EBRT is conditionally recommended as a bridge to transplant or before surgery in carefully selected patients. For patients with unresectable IHC, consolidative EBRT with or without chemotherapy should be considered, typically after systemic therapy. Adjuvant EBRT is conditionally recommended for resected IHC with high-risk features. Selection of dose-fractionation regimen and technique should be based on disease extent, disease location, underlying liver function, and available technologies.

CONCLUSIONS

The task force has proposed recommendations to inform best clinical practices on the use of EBRT for HCC and IHC with strong emphasis on multidisciplinary care. Future studies should focus on further defining the role of EBRT in the context of liver-directed and systemic therapies and refining optimal regimens and techniques.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis

Traditionally, liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis is not recommended. However, with recent developments in locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma, more aggressive treatments have been attempted for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Recently, various studies on locoregional therapies for downstaging followed by living donor liver transplantation reported inspiring overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients. These downstaging procedures included three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, trans-arterial chemoembolization, stereotactic body radiation therapy, trans-arterial radioembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and combinations of these therapies. Selection of the optimal downstaging protocol should depend on tumor location, biology and background liver status. The risk factors affecting outcome include pre-downstaging alpha-fetoprotein values, delta alpha-fetoprotein values, disappearance of portal vein tumor thrombosis on imaging and meeting the Milan criteria or not after downstaging. For hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis, downstaging procedure with liver transplantation in mind would be helpful. If the reaction of the downstaged tumor is good, liver transplantation may be performed.

Radiological tumor response and histopathological correlation of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy as a bridge to liver transplantation

PURPOSE

To assess the imaging findings of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a bridging therapy prior to liver transplantation (LT), with histopathological correlation at liver explant.

METHODS

Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study. The study subjects included 25 HCC lesions in 23 patients (20 males; median age, 60 years; range 41-68 years) who underwent LT after SBRT for HCC as a bridge to LT in a single tertiary referral institution over a 12-year period. Target HCC lesions were assessed for imaging biomarkers on contrast-enhanced CT or MRI including change in HCC diameter and assessment of percentage necrosis. The radiologic response at pre-LT imaging was compared to explant pathology.

RESULTS

There was a positive correlation between the tumor size (Spearman's ρ = 0.86; p < 0.001) and percentage necrosis (p < 0.001) on Pre-LT imaging and those on pathology. Partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) according to RECIST 1.1 were seen in 8 (32%), 15 (60%), and 2 (8%) lesions on pre-LT imaging, respectively. Of the 15 lesions with radiologic SD, 5/15 (33%) showed necrosis of more than 50% on post-SBRT imaging, while 9/15 (60%) showed necrosis of more than 50% at explant pathologic analysis, showing a tendency to underestimate the degree of tumor necrosis compared to pathology.

CONCLUSION

RECIST 1.1 radiologic response criteria may underestimate the response to treatment with SBRT, and radiologic estimation of percent tumor necrosis was more closely correlated with pathologic percent tumor necrosis.

Clinical outcome and pathologic correlation of stereotactic body radiation therapy as a bridge to transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a case series

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is scant information about its safety and effectiveness in the neoadjuvant setting prior to liver transplantation (LT). We present the clinical outcome and pathologic assessment of SBRT followed by LT for patients with advanced HCC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included HCC patients treated with neoadjuvant SBRT prior to LT between 2009 and 2018. Radiographic response and adverse effects, including radiation-induced liver disease (RILD), were evaluated. Pathologic response was assessed by the percentage of tumor necrosis relative to the total tumor volume. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients underwent SBRT for a total of 25 HCC lesions, followed by LT. The median tumor size was 4.45 cm in diameter, and the median prescribed dose was 45 Gy in 5 fractions. SBRT provided significant AFP reduction, 100% infield control, and a 62.5% response rate. The maximum detected toxicity included grade 3 thrombocytopenia and two grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia. One patient developed non-classic RILD. Patients were bridged to LT with a median time of 8.4 months after SBRT, and 23.1% of them achieved a complete pathologic response. The median OS and RFS were 37.8 and 18.3 months from the time of LT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT provides favorable tumor control and acceptable adverse effects for patients awaiting LT. Further prospective studies to test SBRT as a bridging therapy for LT are feasible.

Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma after stereotactic body radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To determine the long-term natural history of size change in SBRT-treated HCC to identify an imaging biomarker to help assess treatment response.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive HCCs treated with SBRT from January 2008 to December 2016 with either 2 years post-treatment MRI follow-up or post-treatment resection histology. Size, major features for HCC, and mRECIST and LI-RADS v.2018 treatment response criteria were assessed at each post-treatment MRI. Local progression, distant progression, and survival were modeled with Kaplan Meier analyses.

RESULTS

56 HCCs met inclusion criteria. Mean baseline HCC diameter was 30 mm (range: 9-105 mm). At 3 months, 76% (N = 43) of treated HCCs decreased in size (mean reduction: 8 mm, range: 5-99 mm) and 0% (N = 0) increased in size. By 24 months, 11% (N = 5) had increased in size and were considered local progression. APHE remained in 77% (43/56) at 3 months, 38% (19/50) at 12 months, and 23% (11/47) at 24 months. mRECIST-defined viable disease was observed in 77% (43/56) at 3 months and 20% (9/47) at 24 months. LI-RADS v.2018 criteria identified viable or equivocal disease in 0% at 3 months and 10% (5/47) at 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Gradual loss of APHE and slow decrease in size are normal findings in HCCs treated with SBRT, and persistent APHE does not indicate viable disease. mRECIST is not accurate in the assessment of HCC after SBRT due to an overreliance on APHE to define viable disease. Increasing mass size or new nodular APHE at the treatment site may indicate local progression.

Impact of successful local ablative bridging therapy prior to liver transplantation on long-term survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis

Background

It has been shown that local ablative procedures enable downsizing, reduce drop-out from the waiting list and improve prognosis after liver transplantation. It is still unclear whether a response to the local ablative therapy is due to a favorable tumor biology or if a real benefit in tumor stabilization exists, particularly in complete pathological response.

Method

Data of 163 HCC patients who underwent liver transplantation were extracted from our prospectively maintained registry. We analyzed the tumor load, pre-transplant α-fetoprotein levels, child stage aside the application and success of local ablative therapies as bridging procedures before transplantation.

Results

87 patients received multiple and/or combined local therapies. In 20 cases, this resulted in a complete remission of the tumor as observed in the explant histology. The other 76 patients underwent no bridging procedure. The observed 5- and 10-year survival rates for patients with bridging were 67% and 47% and without bridging 56% and 46%, respectively. Tumor-related 10-year survival showed a statistically significant difference between both groups (81% versus 59%). In the multivariate analyses bridging, number of lesions and α-fetoprotein level showed an independent statistically significant influence on tumor-related survival in these patients.

Conclusions

Successful local ablative therapy before liver transplantation is an independent statistically significant factor in long-term tumor-related survival for patients with HCC in cirrhosis and reduces tumor recurrences.

An overview of stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Introduction: According to several guidelines, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be considered an alternative to other modalities, such as resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), or when these therapies have failed or are contraindicated. This article reviews the current status of SBRT for the treatment of HCC.Areas covered: From the results of many retrospective reports, SBRT is a promising modality with an excellent local control of almost 90% at 2-3 years and acceptable toxicities. Currently there are no randomized trials to compare SBRT and other modalities, such as resection, RFA, and TACE, but many retrospective reports and propensity score matching have shown that SBRT is comparable to the different modalities. Repeated SBRT for intra-hepatic recurrent HCC also resulted in high local control with safety and satisfactory overall survival, which were comparable to those of other curative local treatments.Expert opinion: Despite the good results of SBRT, the conclusions of the comparisons of SBRT and other modalities are still controversial. Further studies, including randomized phase III studies to define that patients are more suitable for each curative local treatment, are needed.

Prognostic Significance of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy

The role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW MRI) in assessing durable tumor control for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) was not defined. This retrospective study included 34 HCC patients with 45 lesions who had DW MRI data at baseline and within 6 months post-SABR. On the first post-SABR MRI, 13 lesions (28.9%) had a complete response (CR), 12 (26.7%) had a partial response (PR), 17 (37.8%) had stable disease, and 3 (6.7%) had progressive disease by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). On subsequent imaging, the response rate improved from 55.6% to 75.6%. The apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) (mean ± standard deviation) pre- and post-SABR were 1.43 ± 0.28 and 1.72 ± 0.34 (×10⁻³ mm²/s), respectively (p < 0.001). An ADC change ≥25% (DW[+]) was identified as a predictor of favorable in-field control (IFC) (1-year IFC, 93.3% vs. 50.0% for DW[−], p = 0.004), but an mRECIST-based positive response (CR and PR) at the first MRI was not (p = 0.130). In conclusion, ADC change on early MRI is closely related to IFC in HCCs treated with SABR. Standardization of the DW MRI protocol, as well as prospective validation studies, are warranted.

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis: Beyond the known frontiers

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most frequent malignant tumors worldwide: Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) occurs in about 35%-50% of patients and represents a strong negative prognostic factor, due to the increased risk of tumor spread into the bloodstream, leading to a high recurrence risk. For this reason, it is a contraindication to liver transplantation and in several prognostic scores sorafenib represents its standard of care, due to its antiangiogenetic action, although it can grant only a poor prolongation of life expectancy. Recent scientific evidences lead to consider PVTT as a complex anatomical and clinical condition, including a wide range of patients with different prognosis and new treatment possibilities according to the degree of portal system involvement, tumor biological aggressiveness, complications caused by portal hypertension, patient's clinical features and tolerance to antineoplastic treatments. The median survival has been reported to range between 2.7 and 4 mo in absence of therapy, but it can vary from 5 mo to 5 years, thus depicting an extremely variable scenario. For this reason, it is extremely important to focus on the most adequate strategy to be applied to each group of PVTT patients.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver malignancy worldwide and a major cause of cancer-related mortality for which liver resection is an important curative-intent treatment option. However, many patients present with advanced disease and with underlying chronic liver disease and/or cirrhosis, limiting the proportion of patients who are surgical candidates. In addition, the development of recurrent or de novo cancers following surgical resection is common. These issues have led investigators to evaluate the benefit of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies aimed at improving resectability rates and decreasing recurrence rates. While high-level evidence to guide treatment decision making is lacking, recent advances in locoregional and systemic therapies, including antiviral treatment and immunotherapy, raise the prospect of novel approaches that may improve the outcomes of patients with HCC. In this review, we evaluate the evidence for various neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies and discuss opportunities for future clinical and translational research.

Neoadjuvant conformal radiotherapy before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matched analysis of postoperative morbidity and oncological results

Aim: To assess neoadjuvant conformal radiotherapy (CRT) before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not suitable for standard locoregional treatments. Methods: Patients undergoing OLT for HCC with or without prior CRT were compared using 1:3 propensity score matching. Results: After propensity score matching, 23 patients with CRT were compared with 66 control subjects. Severe morbidity rate was 34.8 versus 24.2% in the CRT and non-CRT groups (p = 0.289). Complete pathological response was observed in 47.8% of CRT-targeted nodules. The 1-/3-/5-year disease-free survivals were 77.3, 77.3 and 68.7% in the CRT group versus 85.4, 68.0 and 61.7% in the non-CRT group (p = 0.829). Conclusion: Conformal radiotherapy represents a satisfactory neoadjuvant therapy for OLT candidates not suitable for standard HCC locoregional therapies.

2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer globally and the fourth most common cancer in men in Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle-aged and elderly patients. These practice guidelines will provide useful and constructive advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 44 experts in hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology in the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2014 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions.

2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer globally and the fourth most common cancer in men in Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle-aged and elderly patients. These practice guidelines will provide useful and constructive advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 44 experts in hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology and radiation oncology in the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2014 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current State and Future Opportunities

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a rising cause of morbidity and mortality in the USA and around the world. Surgical resection and liver transplantation are the preferred management strategies; however, less than 30% of patients are eligible for surgery. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is a promising local treatment option for non-surgical candidates. Local control rates between 95 and 100% have been reported at 1-2 years post-treatment, and classical radiation-induced liver disease described with conventional radiation is an unlikely complication from stereotactic radiotherapy. Enrollment in randomized trials will be essential in establishing the role of stereotactic radiation in treatment paradigms for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Trends and Controversies

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Depending on the extent of disease and competing comorbidities for mortality, multiple liver-directed therapy options exist for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Advancements in radiation oncology have led to the emergence of stereotactic body radiation therapy as a promising liver-directed therapy, which delivers high doses of radiation with a steep dose gradient to maximize local tumor control and minimize radiation-induced treatment toxicity. In this study, we review the current clinical data as well as the unresolved issues and controversies regarding stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: (1) Is there a radiation dose–response relationship with hepatocellular carcinoma? (2) What are the optimal dosimetric predictors of radiation-induced liver disease, and do they differ for patients with varying liver function? (3) How do we assess treatment response on imaging? (4) How does stereotactic body radiation therapy compare to other liver-directed therapy modalities, including proton beam therapy? Based on the current literature discussed, this review highlights future possible research and clinical directions.

[Stereotactic hypofractionated radiation therapy as a bridge to transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Case report of a complete pathological response and review of the literature]

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are on liver transplant waiting list usually require local treatment to limit any risk of tumour growth. Historically percutaneous radiofrequency ablation or transarterial chemoembolization represented the major therapeutic alternatives. Depending on the size, or the topography of the lesion these two techniques may not be feasible. Radiation therapy under stereotactic conditions has recently emerged in the management of localized hepatocellular carcinoma as an alternative to the focused therapies performed to date. We herein report the case of a 43-year-old patient harbouring a complete histological response on explant after liver stereotactic irradiation and discuss its role in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in primary hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and future directions

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a form of radiation therapy that has been used in the treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over the past decade. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of SBRT in primary HCC, a literature search was conducted to identify original research articles published from January 2000 through January 2018 in PubMed on SBRT in HCC. All relevant studies published from 2004 to 2018 were included. Prospective studies demonstrated 2-year local control (LC) rates ranging from 64-95% and overall survival (OS) rates ranging from 34% (2-year) to 65% (3-year). Retrospective studies demonstrated 2-year LC rates of 44-90% and 2-year OS rates of 24-67%. Reported toxicities in primary HCC patients vary but SBRT appears to be relatively well tolerated. Studies comparing SBRT to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are few, but they suggest SBRT may be more effective than RFA in specific primary HCC populations. Additionally, SBRT appears to increase the efficacy of both transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib in selected primary HCC populations.

The role of external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of hepatocellular cancer

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in incidence and mortality. Although the prognosis remains poor, long-term survival has improved from 3% in 1970 to an 18% 5-year survival rate today. This is likely because of the introduction of well tolerated, oral antiviral therapies for hepatitis C. Curative options for patients with HCC are often limited by underlying liver dysfunction/cirrhosis and medical comorbidities. Less than one-third of patients are candidates for surgery, which is the current gold standard for cure. Nonsurgical treatments include embolotherapies, percutaneous ablation, and ablative radiation. Technological advances in radiation delivery in the past several decades now allow for safe and effective ablative doses to the liver. Conformal techniques allow for both dose escalation to target volumes and normal tissue sparing. Multiple retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated that hypofractionated image-guided radiation therapy, used as monotherapy or in combination with other liver-directed therapies, can provide excellent local control that is cost effective. Therefore, as the HCC treatment paradigm continues to evolve, ablative radiation treatment has moved from a palliative treatment to both a "bridge to transplant" and a definitive treatment.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy used as a bridge to liver transplant in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and Child-Pugh score ≥8 cirrhosis

INTRODUCTION

To report on SBRT as a bridge to OLT for patients with HCC and Child-Pugh ≥8 cirrhosis.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 15 patients, treated from 2010-2017. Three patients excluded secondary to delisting from prohibitive substance. Twelve patients (17 lesions) included for final analysis. Hepatic SPECT functional treatment planning utilized.

RESULTS

The median age of 60 years with a median CP 9 and MELD 14. The median SBRT dose was 40 Gy in 5 fractions, and median tumor size was 2.3cm (1.2-5.3cm). Median follow-up and survival was 40-months and 46-months, respectively. One patient succumbed to renal/hepatic failure before OLT. Radiographic response was 80%. pCR at explant was 46%. No grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities. Median time to progression of CP ≥ 2 was 9.7-months and MELD progression was not met before OLT.

CONCLUSION

SBRT with functional treatment planning can be used safely as a bridge to OLT in select patients with CP ≥8 cirrhosis.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy vs. TACE or RFA as a bridge to transplant in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. An intention-to-treat analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is limited information on the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a bridge to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma and no study comparing its efficacy to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). We aimed to ascertain the safety and efficacy of SBRT on an intention-to-treat basis compared with TACE and RFA as a bridge to liver transplantation in a large cohort of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

Outcomes between groups were compared from the time of listing and from the time of transplant. Between July 2004 and December 2014, 379 patients were treated with either SBRT (n=36, SBRT group), TACE (n=99, TACE group) or RFA (n=244, RFA group).

RESULTS

The drop-out rate was similar between groups (16.7% SBRT group vs. 20.2% TACE group and 16.8% RFA group, p=0.7); 30 patients were transplanted in the SBRT group, 79 in the TACE group and 203 in the RFA group. Postoperative complications were similar between groups. Patients in the RFA group had more tumor necrosis in the explant. The 1-, 3- and 5-year actuarial patient survival from the time of listing was 83%, 61% and 61% in the SBRT group vs. 86%, 61% and 56% in the TACE group, and 86%, 72% and 61% in the RFA group, p=0.4. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival from the time of transplant was 83%, 75% and 75% in the SBRT group vs. 96%, 75% and 69% in the TACE group, and 95%, 81% and 73% in the RFA group, p=0.7.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, SBRT can be safely utilized as a bridge to LT in patients with HCC, as an alternative to conventional bridging therapies.

LAY SUMMARY

Patients with liver cancer included in the waiting list for liver transplantation are at risk of tumor progression and death. Stereotactic body radiotherapy may be a good alternative to conventional therapies to reduce this risk.