1
|
Renard S, Parent L, de Marzi L, Tsoutsou P, Kirova Y. Electron radiation therapy: Back to the future? Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:553-559. [PMID: 39389842 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/20/2024] [Indexed: 10/12/2024]
Abstract
Electron radiotherapy has long been preferred to photons for the treatment of superficial lesions because of its physical characteristics (high dose at the surface, rapid decrease in depth). Other characteristics (penumbra, heterogeneity on an oblique or irregular surface) make them difficult to use. In most indications (skin cancers, head and neck, medulloblastoma), with technical progress, in some cases they have been replaced by intensity-modulated conformal radiotherapy, brachytherapy and contact therapy. Other indications (drainage of mesotheliomas or irradiation of benign lesions) have disappeared. The low frequency of use leads to problems of safety and cost-effectiveness. However, modern photon radiotherapy techniques are still less effective than electrons in specific indications such as total skin irradiation (mycosis fungoides) or certain thin chest wall irradiations after total mastectomy, reirradiation or paediatric treatments without protons. Flash therapy, initiated by electrons, has been developed over the last 10 years, providing high-dose irradiation in an extremely short time. Initial results show good efficacy, with fewer side effects than with conventional radiotherapy. These results are leading to clinical technological developments on a larger scale. Although it has been replaced in most indications by more modern techniques, electron radiotherapy remains essential for targeted indications in specialised centres. The emergence of flash therapy will lead to new indications, on machines equipped with this new technology, which have yet to be defined and are currently the responsibility of specialised teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Renard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, 6, avenue de Bourgogne, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
| | - Laure Parent
- Medical Physics Department, Oncopole Claudius-Regaud, Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Radiation Oncology Department, institut Curie, université PSL, université Paris Saclay, Inserm Lito U1288, campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - Pelagia Tsoutsou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève (HUG), faculté de médecine, université de Genève, avenue de la Roseraie 53, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin, 78000 Versailles, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Souidi S, Loap P, Laki F, Amessis M, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. Long-term efficacy and tolerance of a technique for postmastectomy electron beam radiation therapy of the unreconstructed chest wall and lymph node areas for non-metastatic breast cancers. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:362-369. [PMID: 37169637 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the long-term tolerance and outcome of patients irradiated with an electron beam technique used since 2007 on the chest wall and lymph node areas after mastectomy for non-metastatic locally advanced breast carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients irradiated with an improved electron beam technique after mastectomy for non-metastatic breast carcinoma between 2007 and 2011 at Institut Curie (France) were included in this descriptive study. The technique has already been described in other studies, as has its 5-year tolerance and non-inferiority compared to photon irradiation. Acute and chronic toxicity were collected using CTCAE v 3.0. A clinical examination was carried out each week during the radiotherapy and at each 6 months consultation with one mammogram per year at the Institut Curie for at least 5 years. The patients then continued to be followed either at the Institut Curie or in private practice with a good transmission of outpatient consultations, thanks to a system of forms to be completed and integrated into the electronic files. Quantitative and qualitative data are defined by mean and proportion. Statistical comparisons were made by computer using the Chi2 test and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Recurrence-free survival was defined as the time between the end of treatment and the date of recurrence or death. Overall survival was defined in the same way without taking into account recurrences. Patients who did not report any events were censored at the date of last news. RESULTS Of the 796 patients included, 51.3% had multifocal lesions, 10.1% had triple negative status, and 18.8% displayed overexpression of the Her2 receptor, 196 (24.6%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 208 (26.1%) systemic treatment during radiotherapy (chemotherapy or targeted therapy); 514 (64.6%) had at least one positive lymph node. The internal mammary chain (IMC) was irradiated in 85.6% of cases, the supraclavicular areas in 88.3% of cases, the infraclavicular in 77.9% of cases and the axillary area in 14.9% of cases. With a median follow-up of 113 months (range: 2-164 months), locoregional recurrence-free survival and overall 10-year survival was respectively 94.02%, (95% CI: 92.13-98.94) and 79.84% (95% CI: 76.83-82.97). Median survival was not reached. In the long term, 29.6% of patients had telangiectasias (grade 1: 23.3%, grade 2: 5.2%, grade 3: 1.1%). There were 279 patients (35.1%) with secondary breast reconstruction on average 21 months after all treatments. IMC irradiation was not associated with a majority of pulmonary toxicity. Thirty-five patients developed chronic heart disease after radiotherapy, 30 of whom had received anthracyclines and 9 had received traztuzumab. Three of these reported a coronary ischaemic event, including 2 irradiated on the left and 1 on the right, the 4 were irradiated in the vicinity of the IMC and the other lymph node areas, but presented many other cardiovascular risk factors (between 2 and 4). During follow-up, 4.9% of patients had a contralateral recurrence (n=39) and 5.5% had a second non-breast cancer (n=44), of the 6 bronchopulmonary cancers diagnosed, none appeared to be related to chest wall radiotherapy. CONCLUSION This study confirms that the improved postmastectomy electron beam radiation therapy technique is well-tolerated after nearly 10 years of follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Souidi
- Department of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - P Loap
- Department of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - F Laki
- Department of surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - M Amessis
- Department of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Fourquet
- Department of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Y Kirova
- Department of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin, Versailles, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clinical outcomes of curative-intent multimodal management of chemorefractory nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:30-37. [PMID: 35648170 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01960-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chemorefractory nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) which progresses under neoadjuvant chemotherapy poses specific therapeutic challenges: either pursuing a curative-intent treatment with a salvage combination of radiotherapy and surgery or switching to second-line systemic treatments despite the absence of metastasis. Due to the rarity of this situation, no specific management guidelines exist and the outcomes of these patients remain uncertain. In this retrospective observational study, we aimed to report the clinical outcomes of patients treated in a curative intent for chemorefractory nonmetastatic IBC, with a multimodal salvage treatment combining radiotherapy and surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS This single-center retrospective observational study included all chemorefractory nonmetastatic IBC treated at the Institut Curie (Paris, France). Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) were calculated from the time of diagnosis and from the time of neoadjuvant chemotherapy interruption. RESULTS Between January 2010 and January 2018, 7 patients presented with chemorefractory nonmetastatic IBC with a progressive disease during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall, chemorefractory IBC patients were young (median age of 50 years), had a good performance status, and usually presented with node-positive tumors characterized by a combination of adverse histological factors such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), grade III, and high proliferation index. From the date of pathological diagnosis, 1‑year OS, DFS, and LRRFS were 64.3%, 53.6%, and 71.4%, respectively. From the date of neoadjuvant chemotherapy interruption, 1‑year OS, DFS, and LRRFS were 47.6%, 19.0%, and 45.7%, respectively, and median OS, DFS, and LRRFS were 8.3, 5.0, and 5.0 months, respectively. CONCLUSION The prognosis of chemorefractory nonmetastatic IBC treated with a multimodal approach combining surgery and radiotherapy is particularly reserved, despite the curative intent of the salvage treatment and the lack of distant metastasis at the time of treatment. Optimal treatment modalities are still to be defined in this rare but critical presentation of IBC.
Collapse
|
4
|
Shin DS, Kim TH, Rah JE, Lee SB, Lim YK, Jeong J, Kim H, Shin D, Son J. Flexible real-time skin dosimeter based on a thin-film copper indium gallium selenide solar cell for electron radiation therapy. Med Phys 2022; 50:2402-2416. [PMID: 36583513 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Various dosimeters have been proposed for skin dosimetry in electron radiotherapy. However, one main drawback of these skin dosimeters is their lack of flexibility, which could make accurate dose measurements challenging due to air gaps between a curved patient surface and dosimeter. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to suggest a novel flexible skin dosimeter based on a thin-film copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) solar cell, and to evaluate its dosimetric characteristics. METHODS The CIGS solar cell dosimeter consisted of (a) a customized thin-film CIGS solar cell and (b) a data acquisition (DAQ) system. The CIGS solar cell with a thickness of 0.33 mm was customized to a size of 10 × 10 mm2 . This customized solar cell plays a role in converting therapeutic electron radiation into electrical signals. The DAQ system was composed of a voltage amplifier with a gain of 1000, a voltage input module, a DAQ chassis, and an in-house software. This system converted the electrical analog signals (from solar cell) to digital signals with a sampling rate of ≤50 kHz and then quantified/visualized the digital signals in real time. We quantified the linearity/ sampling rate effect/dose rate dependence/energy dependence/field size output factor/reproducibility/curvature/bending recoverability/angular dependence of the CIGS solar cell dosimeter in therapeutic electron beams. To evaluate clinical feasibility, we measured the skin point doses by attaching the CIGS solar cell to an anthropomorphic phantom surface (for forehead, mouth, and thorax). The CIGS-measured doses were compared with calculated doses (by treatment planning system) and measured doses (by optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter). RESULTS The normalized signals of the solar cell dosimeter increased linearly as the delivered dose increased. The gradient of the linearly fitted line was 1.00 with an R-square of 0.9999. The sampling rates (2, 10, and 50 kHz) of the solar cell dosimeter showed good performance even at low doses (<50 cGy). The solar cell dosimeter exhibited dose rate independence within 1% and energy independence within 3% error margins. The signals of the solar cell dosimeter were similar (<1%) when penetrating the same side of the CIGS cell regardless of the rotation angle of the solar cell. The field size output factor measured by the solar cell dosimeter was comparable to that measured by the ion chamber. The solar cell signals were similar between the baseline (week 1) and the last time point (week 4). Our detector showed curvature independence within 1.8% (curvatures of <0.10 mm- ) and bending recovery (curvature of 0.10 mm-1 ). The differences between measured doses (CIGS solar cell dosimeter vs. optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter) were 7.1%, 9.6%, and 1.0% for forehead, mouth, and thorax, respectively. CONCLUSION We present the construction of a flexible skin dosimeter based on a CIGS solar cell. Our findings demonstrate that the CIGS solar cell has a potential to be a novel flexible skin dosimeter for electron radiotherapy. Moreover, this dosimeter is manufactured with low cost and can be easily customized to various size/shape, which represents advantages over other dosimeters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Seok Shin
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae-Ho Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong-Eun Rah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Se Byeong Lee
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Kyung Lim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Jonghwi Jeong
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Haksoo Kim
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Dongho Shin
- Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaeman Son
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Radiotherapy in the Management of Non-Metastatic Inflammatory Breast Cancers: A Retrospective Observational Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010107. [PMID: 35008271 PMCID: PMC8750160 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Inflammatory breast cancers (IBC) are characterized by a poor prognosis. This retrospective study aims to describe the clinical outcomes of non-metastatic IBC patients treated with a multidisciplinary approach with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. (2) Methods: This single-center retrospective study included all women patients diagnosed with non-metastatic IBC between January 2010 and January 2018 at the Institut Curie (Paris, France) and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional free survival (LRRFS) were calculated from the time of diagnosis. Prognostic factors for patient survival were analyzed based on univariate and multivariate regressions. (3) Results: We identified 113 patients with a median age of 51 years. 79.7% had node-positive tumors; triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) represented 34.6% of the cases. A large majority of patients (91.2%) received adjuvant post-mastectomy while ten patients (8.8%) received preoperative radiotherapy. Non-pathological complete response (non-pCR) was observed in 67.3% of patients. Radiotherapy delivered a median dose of 50 Gy to the breast or the chest wall in 25 fractions. With a median follow-up of 54 months, 5-year OS, DFS and LRRFS were 78% (CI: 70.1-86.8%), 68.1% (59.6-77.7%), and 85.2% (78.4-92.7%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, non-pCR was an adverse prognosis factor for OS, DFS, and LRRFS; pre-operative radiotherapy was an adverse prognosis factor for OS and DFS. Radiation-related adverse events were limited to acute skin toxicity (22% of Grade 2 and 2% of grade 3 dermatitis); no late radiation-induced toxicity was reported. (4) Conclusions: High locoregional control could be achieved with multidisciplinary management of non-metastatic IBC, suggesting the anti-tumor efficacy of radiotherapy in this rare but pejorative clinicopathological presentation. While comparing favorably with historical cohorts, OS and DFS could be potentially improved in the future with the use of new systemic treatments, such as PARP-inhibitors or immunotherapy.
Collapse
|
6
|
Schmitt M, Eber J, Antoni D, Noel G. Should the management of radiation therapy for breast cancer be standardized? Results of a survey on current French practices in breast radiotherapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2021; 26:814-826. [PMID: 34760316 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women in France. Its management has evolved considerably in recent years with a focus on reducing iatrogenic toxicity. The radiotherapy indications are validated in multidisciplinary consultation meetings; however, questions remain outstanding, particularly regarding hypofractionated radiotherapy, partial breast irradiation, and irradiation of the internal mammary chain and axillary lymph node area. Materials and methods An online survey was sent to 47 heads of radiotherapy departments in France. The survey consisted of 22 questions concerning indications for irradiation of the supraclavicular, internal mammary and axillary lymph node areas; irradiation techniques and modalities; prescribed doses; and fractionation. Results Twenty-four out of 47 centers responded (response rate of 51%). This survey demonstrated a wide variation in the prescribed dose regimen, monoisocentric radiotherapy, and indications of irradiation of the lymph node areas. Conclusion This survey provides insight into the current radiotherapy practice for breast cancer in France. It shows the need to standardize practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Schmitt
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut du Cancer, Strasbourg, Europe, France
| | - Jordan Eber
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut du Cancer, Strasbourg, Europe, France
| | - Delphine Antoni
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut du Cancer, Strasbourg, Europe, France
| | - Georges Noel
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut du Cancer, Strasbourg, Europe, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Loap P, Loirat D, Berger F, Cao K, Ricci F, Jochem A, Raizonville L, Mosseri V, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. Combination of Olaparib with radiotherapy for triple-negative breast cancers: One-year toxicity report of the RADIOPARP Phase I trial. Int J Cancer 2021; 149:1828-1832. [PMID: 34270809 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 06/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells are sensitive to PARP1 inhibitors in vitro. The combination of Olaparib and radiotherapy for TNBC is currently evaluated in the Phase I RADIOPARP trial. RADIOPARP is a monocentric prospective open-label Phase I dose-escalation trial evaluating the combination of breast radiotherapy and Olaparib in TNBC patients with inflammatory, locoregionally advanced or metastatic disease, or with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Olaparib was orally given at increasing dose levels (50, 100, 150 or 200 mg twice a day [BID]); radiotherapy consisted of 50 Gy to the breast or chest wall with or without lymph node irradiation. Twenty-four TNBC patients were enrolled between September 2017 and November 2019. Olaparib was escalated to 200 mg BID without dose-limiting toxicities. At 1-year follow-up, no treatment-related grade ≥3 toxicity was observed. One patient (4.2%) had persistent grade 2 adverse events (breast pain, fibrosis and deformity). There was no cardiac, pulmonary or digestive toxicity related to treatment. The 1-year follow-up report of the RADIOPARP Phase I trial, evaluating Olaparib associated with breast radiotherapy in TNBC patients, consequently demonstrated an excellent toxicity profile of this combination with few low-grade adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Loap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Delphine Loirat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | - Kim Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Ricci
- Department of Clinical Investigations, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Anne Jochem
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Alain Fourquet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dahn HM, Boersma LJ, de Ruysscher D, Meattini I, Offersen BV, Pignol JP, Aristei C, Belkacemi Y, Benjamin D, Bese N, Coles CE, Franco P, Ho A, Hol S, Jagsi R, Kirby AM, Marrazzo L, Marta GN, Moran MS, Nichol AM, Nissen HD, Strnad V, Zissiadis YE, Poortmans P, Kaidar-Person O. The use of bolus in postmastectomy radiation therapy for breast cancer: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 163:103391. [PMID: 34102286 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Post mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) reduces locoregional recurrence (LRR) and breast cancer mortality for selected patients. Bolus overcomes the skin-sparing effect of external-beam radiotherapy, ensuring adequate dose to superficial regions at risk of local recurrence (LR). This systematic review summarizes the current evidence regarding the impact of bolus on LR and acute toxicity in the setting of PMRT. RESULTS 27 studies were included. The use of bolus led to higher rates of acute grade 3 radiation dermatitis (pooled rates of 9.6% with bolus vs. 1.2% without). Pooled crude LR rates from thirteen studies (n = 3756) were similar with (3.5%) and without (3.6%) bolus. CONCLUSIONS Bolus may be indicated in cases with a high risk of LR in the skin, but seems not to be necessary for all patients. Further work is needed to define the role of bolus in PMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah M Dahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
| | - Liesbeth J Boersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Dirk de Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
| | - Birgitte V Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | | | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Yazid Belkacemi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, University of Paris-Est (UPEC), Creteil, France; INSERM Unit 955, Team 21. IMRB, Creteil, France.
| | - Dori Benjamin
- Department of Physics, Radiation Oncology, Sheba medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
| | - Nuran Bese
- Department of Clinical Senology, Research Institute of Senology Acibadem, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | | | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy.
| | - Alice Ho
- Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Sandra Hol
- Instituut Verbeeten, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
| | - Anna M Kirby
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
| | - Livia Marrazzo
- Medical Physics Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
| | - Gustavo N Marta
- Department of Radiation Oncology - Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | | | - Alan M Nichol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | | | - Vratislav Strnad
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
| | | | - Philip Poortmans
- Iridium Netwerk and University of Antwerp, Wilrijk Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology or GROW (Maastro), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Adjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) and Concurrent Radiotherapy for Residual Invasive HER2-positive Breast Cancer: Single-center Preliminary Results. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 43:895-901. [PMID: 33027084 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The treatment of nonmetastatic HER2-positive breast cancer with residual invasive disease using concurrent Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and radiotherapy appears to be an effective option. Our aim was to evaluate the acute side effects of this treatment regime. METHODS Fourteen patients were treated between March 2019 and April 2020 concurrent T-DM1 and radiotherapy. Left ventricular ejection fraction was assessed at baseline, before and after radiotherapy. All toxicities were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. RESULTS The median age was 55 years (range 36 to 72). All patients received total dose of 50 Gy for the breast/ chest wall, 10 patients got lymph node irradiation, 4 patients received an additional tumor bed boost. The most common side effect was grade 1 radiodermatitis. A reversible grade 2 left ventricular ejection fraction decrease occurred in 2 patients. During our examination 3 patients showed alanine aminotransferases increase after the cycle 4 of T-DM1, 1 patient had grade 1, 1 patient grade 2, and 1 patient grade 3 alanine aminotransferase increases. CONCLUSIONS The acute toxicity rate especially focusing on skin and cardiac toxicity were assumed acceptable in our cohort. To safely administer this concomitant treatment, further examination and prospective data are needed.
Collapse
|
10
|
Marino L, Lancellotta V, Franco P, Meattini I, Meduri B, Bernini M, Fabi A, Corvò R, Magrini SM, Pappagallo GL, Arcangeli S, D'Angelillo RM. Loco-regional adjuvant radiation therapy in breast cancer patients with positive axillary lymph-nodes at diagnosis (CN2) undergoing preoperative chemotherapy and with complete pathological lymph-nodes response. Development of GRADE (Grades of recommendation, assessment, Development and Evaluation) recommendation by the Italian Association of radiation therapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). Breast 2021; 55:119-127. [PMID: 33445150 PMCID: PMC7808946 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a meta-analysis to determine the effect of loco-regional radiation therapy (RT) compared to no loco-regional RT for operated patients in clinical stage cN2 breast cancer at diagnosis and ypN0 after preoperative chemotherapy (PST). MATERIAL AND METHODS Eligible studies were identified through a systematic search of the medical literature performed independently by two researchers using a validated search strategy. An electronic search of Medline via PubMed and Embase (Breast cancer AND preoperative chemotherapy AND radiation therapy) was conducted with no language or publication status restrictions. The effect of loco-regional RT on overall (OS), disease free (DFS), loco-regional recurrence-free (LRRFS) survival and local recurrence was evaluated. An electronic search of Medline via PubMed and Embase (Toxicity AND radiation therapy breast cancer AND preoperative therapy; toxicity AND breast surgery AND preoperative chemotherapy) was conducted for outcomes of harm: major acute and late skin toxicity, lymphedema and cardiac events. RESULTS Of 333 studies identified, 4 retrospective studies reporting on a total of 1107 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Six and 3 reported data of acute and late skin toxicity, while 2 studies provided information on cardiac events. Pooled results showed no difference in terms of hazard ratio for loco-regional RT versus no loco-regional RT [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-1.68]. Loco-regional RT was associated with an OS benefit in the subgroup analysis: IIIB-C (loco-regional RT 79.3% vs no loco-regional RT 71.2%, p = 0.027) and T3-T4 (loco-regional RT 82.6% vs no loco-regional RT 76.6%, p = 0.025). No difference was shown in terms of 5-year DFS (loco-regional RT 91.2% vs no loco-regional RT 83%, p = 0.441) and LRRFS (loco-regional RT 98.1% vs no loco-regional RT 92.3%, p = 0.148). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of acute and late skin toxicities, lymphedema and cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS Because of the limitations due to the small number of studies and heterogeneity in the analysis, the present study does not allow to draw any definitive conclusion, highlighting the need for well-controlled trials to determine the effect of loco-regional RT in patients with cN2 having a pathological complete response in the axillary nodes after preoperative chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenza Marino
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, Humanitas-Istituto Clinico Catanese, Misterbianco (CT), Italy
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche Ed Ematologiche, Roma, Italy.
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Bruno Meduri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Marco Bernini
- Breast Surgery Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandra Fabi
- Oncology Unit 1, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy; La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Renzo Corvò
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino and Department of Health Science, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefano M Magrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASST Ospedali Civili and Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Arcangeli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Policlinico S. Gerardo and University of Milan "Bicocca", Milan, Italy
| | - Rolando M D'Angelillo
- Radiotherapy, Dipartimento di Biomedicina e Prevenzione, Università Degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kirova Y, Tallet A, Aznar MC, Loap P, Bouali A, Bourgier C. Radio-induced cardiotoxicity: From physiopathology and risk factors to adaptation of radiotherapy treatment planning and recommended cardiac follow-up. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:576-585. [PMID: 32830054 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are the leading cause of mortality worldwide, and breast cancer (BC) the most common malignancy affecting women worldwide. Radiotherapy is an important component of BC treatment and participates in CVD occurrence. It seems, therefore, crucial to gather both radiation oncology and cardiology medical fields to improve the follow-up quality of our BC patients. This review aims at updating our knowledge regarding cardiotoxicities risk factors, and consequently, doses constraints in case of 3D-conformal and IMRT treatment planning. Then we will develop how to reduce cardiac exposure and what kind of cardiac follow-up we could recommend to our breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Kirova
- Department of radiation oncology, institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - A Tallet
- Department of radiation oncology, institut Paoli-Calmette, Marseille, France
| | - M C Aznar
- Division of cancer sciences, faculty of biology, medicine and health, the university of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, and Nuffield department of population health, university of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - P Loap
- Department of radiation oncology, institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - A Bouali
- Cardiology department, Lyon Sud Hospital, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - C Bourgier
- Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie, ICM, institut régional du cancer Montpellier, rue Croix-Verte, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France; IRCM, institut de recherche en cancérologie de Montpellier, inserm U1194, université Montpellier, avenue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 05, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kaidar-Person O, Nissen HD, Yates ES, Andersen K, Boersma LJ, Boye K, Canter R, Costa E, Daniel S, Hol S, Jensen I, Lorenzen EL, Mjaaland I, Nielsen MEK, Poortmans P, Vikström J, Webb J, Offersen BV. Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy Planning After Immediate Implant-based Reconstruction Using the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology-Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice Consensus Guidelines for Target Volume Delineation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 33:20-29. [PMID: 32988717 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate how common radiation therapy techniques perform in the setting of the new European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology-Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice (ESTRO-ACROP) delineation recommendations for immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). MATERIALS AND METHODS Seven Danish radiation therapy centres and six international European centres participated in this project. Two breast cancer cases (one left-sided and one right-sided) with a retropectoral implant were chosen for radiation therapy planning using deep-inspiration breath-hold. Target volumes were delineated according to ESTRO-ACROP delineation recommendations. The centres were asked to plan the cases using any radiation therapy technique according to the Danish Breast Cancer Group plan objectives. RESULTS In total, 35 treatment plans were collected. Half of the submitted plans, for both the left-sided and the right-sided case, used the field-in-field (FiF) technique (nine for each), a quarter used volumetric arc radiation therapy (VMAT; five for right-sided, four for left-sided) and the remaining quarter was a mix of inverse intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), helicoidal therapy and hybrid (combined open fields and VMAT) techniques. Mean clinical target volume doses were in the range 99-102% of the prescribed dose. The median FiF mean heart dose (MHD) for right-sided radiation therapy was 1 Gy (range 0.8-3.7) and 5.2 Gy for left-sided radiation therapy (range 2.2-6.5). For right-sided radiation therapy, the median VMAT MHD was 3.42 Gy, for IMRT was 2.3 Gy and for helicoidal therapy was 5.1 Gy. For left-sided radiation therapy, the median VMAT MHD was 6.3 Gy, for IMRT was 7.8 Gy and for helicoidal therapy was 7.3 Gy. CONCLUSIONS Different radiation therapy techniques could be used to plan radiation therapy in the setting of IBR. FiF provided good coverage with acceptable organ at risk doses. The best dose distribution results as a trade-off between the objectives of target volume coverage and high-dose organ at risk inclusion. The radiation therapy technique affects the interplay between these objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Kaidar-Person
- Oncology Institute, Radiation Therapy Unit, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; Breast Radiation Unit, Sheba Tel Ha'shomer, Ramat Gan, Israel; School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - H D Nissen
- Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - E S Yates
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - K Andersen
- Department of Medical Physics, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - L J Boersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - K Boye
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - R Canter
- MAASTRO Clinic, Maastricht University Hospital, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - E Costa
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - S Daniel
- Department of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - S Hol
- Instituut Verbeeten, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - I Jensen
- Department of Medical Physics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - E L Lorenzen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - I Mjaaland
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - M E K Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - P Poortmans
- Iridium Kankernetwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - J Vikström
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - J Webb
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - B V Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wong G, Lam E, Karam I, Yee C, Drost L, Tam S, Lam H, McCarvell A, McKenzie E, Chow E. The impact of smoking on adjuvant breast cancer radiation treatment: A systematic review. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2020; 24:100185. [PMID: 32593846 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influence of cigarette smoking on cancer risk has been well-studied. Similarly, exposure to ionizing radiation from radiotherapy (RT) can produce detrimental effects on an individual's health. In patients administered RT, there has been an observed relationship in other primary carcinomas. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the influence of cigarette smoking on outcomes post adjuvant RT in breast cancer patients. METHODS OVID Medline, Cochrane and Embase were searched and 1893 articles were identified. A total of 71 articles were included in the review. Study type, published year and sample size, age, systemic therapies, RT techniques and treatment side effects were collected if available. RESULTS The review found 198 different outcomes which fell into 7 categories and similar outcomes were recorded. 40% of skin reaction outcomes, 50% of cardiovascular outcomes, 71% of reconstruction outcomes, 29% of pulmonary function outcomes, 33% of mortality outcomes and 42% of secondary recurrence outcomes reported significant differences between smokers and non-smokers. None of the articles reported non-smokers to have a higher risk than smokers. CONCLUSION Cigarette smoking can pose a higher risk of post-treatment complications that can influence an individual's quality of life, survival rate and/or recurrence risk. This review further assessed the impact of smoking on various patient outcomes and side-effects in the adjuvant breast RT setting. The information provided in this review suggest that smoking cessation programs would help educate patients to understand their risks of being a current or former smoker when undergoing RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina Wong
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emily Lam
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Irene Karam
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caitlin Yee
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leah Drost
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samantha Tam
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Henry Lam
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alyson McCarvell
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erin McKenzie
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Edward Chow
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kim SW, Kim C, Cho MS, Noh S, Lee M, Jeong C, Kwak J, Koh M, Song SY, Lee SW, Soh J, Cho S, Cho B. Clinical implementation of a wide-field electron arc technique with a scatterer for widespread Kaposi's sarcoma in the distal extremities. Sci Rep 2020; 10:9693. [PMID: 32546847 PMCID: PMC7297993 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66846-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
A novel wide-field electron arc technique with a scatterer is implemented for widespread Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) in the distal extremities. Monte Carlo beam modeling for electron arc beams was established to achieve <2% deviation from the measurements, and used for dose calculation. MC-based electron arc plan was performed using CT images of a foot and leg mimicking phantom and compared with in-vivo measurement data. We enrolled one patient with recurrent KS on the lower extremities who had been treated with photon radiation therapy. The 4- and 6-MeV electron arc plans were created, and then compared to two photon plans: two opposite photon beam and volumetric modulated arc with bolus. Compared to the two photon techniques, the electron arc plans resulted in superior dose saving to normal organs beneath the skin region, although it shows inferior coverage and homogeneity for PTV. The electron arc treatment technique with scatterer was successfully implemented for the treatment of widespread KS in the distal extremities with lower radiation exposure to the normal organs beyond the skin lesions, which could be a treatment option for recurrent skin cancer in the extremities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung-Woo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Changhwan Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min-Seok Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seonyeong Noh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Minsik Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chiyoung Jeong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jungwon Kwak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Minji Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Si Yeol Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Sang-Wook Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeongtae Soh
- Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Seungryong Cho
- Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Byungchul Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kirova YM, Loap P, Fourquet A. Benefit of Post Mastectomy Radiation Therapy (PMRT) in Node-Positive, HER2-Positive Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Anti-HER2 Treatments. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:511-513. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
16
|
Saadeldin AM, Elwan AM. Characterization of irregular electron beam for boost dose after whole breast irradiation. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:168-173. [PMID: 32021571 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Irradiating a tumor bed with boost dose after whole breast irradiation helps reducing the probability of local recurrence. However, the success of electron beam treatment with a small area aiming to cover a superficial lesion is a dual challenge as it requires an adequate dosimetry beside a double check for dose coverage with an estimation of various combined uncertainty of tumor location and losing lateral electron equilibrium within small field dimensions. Aim of work this work aims to measure the electron beam fluence within different field dimensions and the deviation from measurement performed in standard square electron applicator beam flatness and symmetry, then to calculate the average range of the correction factor required to overcome the loss of lateral electron equilibrium. Material and method the electron beam used in this work generated from the linear accelerator model ELEKTA Precise and dosimetry system used were a pair of PTW Pin Point ion chambers for electron beam dosimetry at standard conditions and assessment of beam quality at a reference depth of measurement, with an automatic water phantom, then a Roos ion chamber was used for absolute dose measurement, and PTW 2Darray to investigate the beam fluence of four applicators 6, 10, 14 and 20 cm2 and 4 rectangular cutouts 6 × 14, 8 × 14, 6 × 17 and 8 × 17 cm2, the second part was clinical application which was performed in a precise treatment planning system and examined boost dose after whole breast irradiation. Results revealed that lower energy (6MeV and 8MeV) showed the loss of lateral electron equilibrium and deviation from measurements of a standard applicator more than the high energy (15 MeV) which indicated that the treatment of superficial dose with 6MeV required higher monitor unit to allow for the loss of lateral electron equilibrium and higher margin as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayat M Saadeldin
- Radiation Oncology Department, El-Hussein University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Azhar M Elwan
- Biochemistry Department, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
In Reply to Khosla et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:1160-1161. [PMID: 31748135 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
18
|
Photons Without Bolus Versus Electrons With Bolus After Upfront Mastectomy Without Immediate Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:877-884. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
19
|
Caractérisation des rechutes locorégionales chez des patientes atteintes d’un cancer du sein traité par irradiation pariétale par électrons : expérience monocentrique de l’institut Curie. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:38-45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2018.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Revised: 04/01/2018] [Accepted: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
20
|
Cao KI, Salviat F, Laki F, Falcou MC, Carton M, Poortmans P, Fourquet A, Kirova YM. Outcomes of postoperative radiation therapy for breast cancer in older women according to age and comorbidity status: An observational retrospective study in 752 patients. J Geriatr Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
21
|
Loganadane G, Xi Z, Xu HP, Grellier Adedjouma N, Bazire L, Fourquet A, Kirova YM. Patterns of loco regional failure in women with breast cancer treated by Postmastectomy Conformal Electron Beam Radiation Therapy (PMERT): Large scale single center experience. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2017; 4:46-50. [PMID: 29594207 PMCID: PMC5833921 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2017.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2017] [Revised: 03/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate loco regional control and describe the patterns of loco regional failure in women with breast cancer irradiated by a previously described post-mastectomy highly conformal electron beam radiotherapy technique. Materials and methods We included all women irradiated by PMERT for non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) between 2007 and 2011 in our department. All cases of bilateral BC were excluded. All patients who experienced loco regional recurrence have been studied. Mapping patterns of regional recurrences was also performed and compared with the ESTRO and RTOG Guidelines of volume definition and delineation guidelines. Results Among the 796 women included, 10.1% were triple-negative (TN) and 18.8% were HER2-positive and 24.6% of them had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT). Internal mammary chain (IMC), supraclavicular (Level IV), infraclavicular (Levels III and II) and axillary LN (Level I) were treated in 85.6%, 88.3%, 77.9% and 14.9% of cases, respectively. With a median follow-up of 64 months (range: 6-102), 5-year locoregional (RFS and OS were 90% (95% CI: 88.1-92.4) and 90.9% (95% CI: 88.9-93), respectively. Twenty-three patients (2.9%) presented locoregional recurrences. Most of them presented aggressive biological features with grade III tumors in 17 patients (74%) with high mitotic index in 16 cases (70%) and triple negative tumors in 12 (52%). Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was observed in 11 cases (48%). In 14 cases the locoregional recurrences were diagnosed at the same time as the metastatic disease whereas 4 patients presented distant metastases secondarily. Local (Chest wall) recurrences occurred in 13 cases (56%) with the coverage by the isodose of 47.5 Gy (isodose 95%). Fifteen regional recurrences (lymph nodes) were observed in 13 patients. Only 3 regional recurrences occurred within irradiated volumes and 12 regional recurrences occurred outside irradiated areas. Conclusion In presented series, the local recurrences were related mostly to the tumor biological aggressivity and radio resistance. Small number was caused by geographical miss. Further follow-up and careful registration of the recurrences is needed to improve their understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zhen Xi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Hao Ping Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | - Louis Bazire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Alain Fourquet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Youlia M Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|