Patterns of loco regional failure in women with breast cancer treated by Postmastectomy Conformal Electron Beam Radiation Therapy (PMERT): Large scale single center experience

Protein disulfide isomerase family member 4 promotes triple-negative breast cancer tumorigenesis and radiotherapy resistance through JNK pathway

BACKGROUND

Despite radiotherapy ability to significantly improve treatment outcomes and survival in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, acquired resistance to radiotherapy poses a serious clinical challenge. Protein disulfide isomerase exists in endoplasmic reticulum and plays an important role in promoting protein folding and post-translational modification. However, little is known about the role of protein disulfide isomerase family member 4 (PDIA4) in TNBC, especially in the context of radiotherapy resistance.

METHODS

We detected the presence of PDIA4 in TNBC tissues and paracancerous tissues, then examined the proliferation and apoptosis of TNBC cells with/without radiotherapy. As part of the validation process, xenograft tumor mouse model was used. Mass spectrometry and western blot analysis were used to identify PDIA4-mediated molecular signaling pathway.

RESULTS

Based on paired clinical specimens of TNBC patients, we found that PDIA4 expression was significantly higher in tumor tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues. In vitro, PDIA4 knockdown not only increased apoptosis of tumor cells with/without radiotherapy, but also decreased the ability of proliferation. In contrast, overexpression of PDIA4 induced the opposite effects on apoptosis and proliferation. According to Co-IP/MS results, PDIA4 prevented Tax1 binding protein 1 (TAX1BP1) degradation by binding to TAX1BP1, which inhibited c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation. Moreover, PDIA4 knockdown suppressed tumor growth xenograft model in vivo, which was accompanied by an increase in apoptosis and promoted tumor growth inhibition after radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that PDIA4 is an oncoprotein that promotes TNBC progression, and targeted therapy may represent a new and effective anti-tumor strategy, especially for patients with radiotherapy resistance.

Individualized Clinical Target Volume for Irradiation of the Supraclavicular Region in Breast Cancer Based on Mapping of the Involved Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes

PURPOSE

To map supraclavicular fossa-involved lymph nodes (SCF-LNs) in patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer, evaluate the coverage of widely adopted atlases, and propose modified borders for individualized regional irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

M0 patients with biopsy-proven SCF-LNs who were SCF treatment-naïve were included. The SCF was spatially divided into subregions, with each node mapped on the original images. The geographic misses after the borders of multiple atlases were evaluated and factors affecting SCF-LNs' spread pattern were analyzed.

RESULTS

From 1998 to 2022, 209 patients with 1242 SCF-LNs were eligible. Patients had a median of 4 nodes. At least 537 nodes (43.2%) in 147 patients (70.3%) were lateral to the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM), and 403 nodes (32.4%) in 127 patients (60.8%) were dorsal to the anterior scalene muscle (ASM). In the 88 patients with ≤3 SCF-LNs, at least 66 nodes (39.1%) in 40 patients (45.5%) were lateral to the SCM, and 34 nodes (20.1%) in 29 patients (33.0%) were dorsal to the ASM. These nodes were not covered by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) atlas and partly within the Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness atlas. One hundred four patients (49.8%) had 432 SCF-LNs (34.8%) beyond the upper border of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) atlas. In multivariate regression, nodal sizes were associated with wider spread in the primary group. Being triple-negative (TN) subtype was associated with less spread in the recurrent group. Situation-based clinical target volumes (CTVs) were theorized, in which for a sequential spread, the posterior border could be the posterior scalene muscle or even be more constringent; otherwise, it should touch the anterior trapezius surface.

CONCLUSIONS

SCF-LNs tend to spread laterally and dorsally beyond the RTOG borders, even in M0 stages with ≤3 SCF-LNs. The ESTRO upper border does not guarantee coverage with multiple SCF-LNs. Nodal burden and non-TN types are predictive of wider dissemination. A situation-based CTV is possibly feasible. Deciphering the SCF-LN spread route is needed.

Internal mammary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients based on anatomical imaging and functional imaging

Internal mammary lymph node (IMLN) metastasis forms part of the clinical node classification for primary breast cancer, which influences the treatment strategy. However, because of the IMLNs' complicated anatomical structures and relationships with adjacent structures, IMLN biopsy or resection is associated with a limited improvement in prognosis and a high complication rate. The positivity rate also varies broadly according to imaging modality, and there is a low rate of agreement between the imaging and pathological diagnoses, which creates imprecision in the preoperative staging. The IMLN positivity rate also varies remarkably, and there are no clear, accurate, and non-invasive modalities for diagnosing the pre-mastectomy IMLN status. Nevertheless, medical imaging modalities continue to evolve, with functional imaging and image-guided thoracoscopic biopsy of sentinel IMLNs being well established. Thus, personalized decision-making and treatment selection should be based on the modality-specific differences in the diagnosis of IMLN metastasis/recurrence and the patient's specific risk factors.

Comparison of Nodal Target Volume Definition in Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy According to RTOG Versus ESTRO Atlases: A Practical Review From the TransAtlantic Radiation Oncology Network (TRONE)

Regional nodal irradiation has gained interest in recent years with the publication of several important randomized trials and the availability of more conformal techniques. Target volume delineation represents a critical step in the radiation planning process. Adequate coverage of the microscopic tumor spread to regional lymph nodes must be weighed against exposure of critical structures such as the heart and lungs. Among available guidelines for delineating the clinical target volume for the breast/chest wall and regional nodes, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology guidelines are the most widely used internationally. These guidelines have been formulated based on anatomic boundaries of areas historically covered in 2-dimensional field-based radiation therapy but have not been validated by patterns-of-failure studies. In recent years, an important body of data has emerged from mapping studies documenting patterns of local and regional recurrence. We aim to review, discuss, and compare contouring guidelines for breast cancer radiation therapy in the context of contemporary data on locoregional relapse to improve their implementation in modern practice.

Mapping of Metastatic Level I Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

We examined the distribution of pretreatment nodal metastases to the level I axilla (Ax-L1) to assess the appropriateness of current breast atlases and provide guidelines in relationship to easily identifiable anatomic landmarks for accurate delineation of this lymph node (LN) basin.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and biopsy-proven metastatic Ax-L1 LNs were identified. We related the location of each LN to its most adjacent rib and its distance from the bottom of the humeral head, axillary vessels, and a line connecting the anterior aspects of the pectoralis and latissimus dorsi muscles (P-L line). LNs were mapped onto a representative planning computed tomography scan, and their distribution was used to validate the current Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, and Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness breast atlases. Furthermore, we examined metastases to a subregion encompassing the superolateral Ax-L1, irradiation of which correlates highly with lymphedema.

RESULTS

We identified 106 eligible patients with 107 biopsied LNs. All LNs fell between the second and fifth ribs (mean, 3.8 ± 0.56). Mean distance from the inferior aspect of the humeral head was 4.3 ± 1.6 cm (range, 0.3-8.4). Mean distance from the inferior aspect of the axillary vessels was 2.9 ± 1.5 cm (range, -0.6 to 5.4). Mean distance from the P-L line was 0.01 ± 1.9 cm (range, -2.2 to 2.4); negative and positive values denote medial or lateral to the P-L line. A Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-compliant Ax-L1 consensus contour, created from contours by 4 attending breast radiation oncologists, partially or fully missed 45% of mapped LNs. European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology- and Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness-compliant Ax-L1 similarly missed 46% and 34% of mapped LNs, respectively. LNs were most frequently missed in the lateral direction. The superolateral Ax-L1 encompassed 9.3% of the mapped LNs.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant percentage of at-risk Ax-L1 tissue falls outside current contouring atlases. We propose expansion of the recommended Ax-L1 borders, most notably in the lateral direction.

The Impact of a Postmastectomy Chest Wall Scar Boost on Local Recurrence-free Survival in High-risk Patients

INTRODUCTION

A scar boost following postmastectomy radiation to a total dose of > 50 Gy can be considered in cases of invasive breast cancer with high-risk features including advanced tumor stage, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and positive margins. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a scar boost on 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 140 patients with invasive breast cancer treated with mastectomy and postmastectomy radiation at a single institution between 2007 and 2016. Patients received 50 to 50.4 Gy to the chest wall and the majority of scar boosts were 9 to 10 Gy. LRFS was examined using the Kaplan-Meier method and univariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients met inclusion criteria with a median follow-up time of 48 months. Ninety-four (67.1%) patients did receive a scar boost and 46 (32.9%) patients did not. On subset analysis of patients with LVSI or positive margins, 5-year LRFS was 79.3% in patients treated with scar boost compared with 71.1% in patients without a scar boost (P = .537). In patients with T3 or T4 disease, 5-year LRFS was 80.9% in those who received scar boost and 71.6% in patients who did not (P = .967). The use of a scar boost was not associated with a significant improvement in LRFS on Cox regression (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.84; P = .654).

CONCLUSION

Use of a scar boost following postmastectomy radiation decreased the absolute percentages of local recurrences in patients with high-risk features; however, this did not translate into a statistically significant benefit.