Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy Does Not Increase Risk of Anastomotic Leak in Patients With Gastric Cancer

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Long-Term Results and Statistical Algorithm to Predict Individual Risk of Relapse

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (LAGC) intended to receive induction chemotherapy, chemoradiation and surgery and to develop an algorithm to estimate the individual risk of relapse in a population-based setting.

METHODS

Patients with LAGC (cT3-4 and/or N+) were retrospectively evaluated. A pathological response was graded according to the Becker criteria. The nodal regression grade was assessed by a 4-point scale (A-D). A comprehensive analysis of 155 individual patient variables was performed, and logistic regression (LR) was utilized to develop a predictive model for relapse risk.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2024, 48 patients were analyzed. After a median follow-up of 49 months (range, 12-212), the 5-year actuarial PFS and OS rates were 44% and 48%, respectively. Four variables were identified as the most relevant features for training the LR model. Scores for the model accuracy, sensitivity and specificity (mean +/- sd) were 0.79 +/- 0.12, 0.74 +/- 0.221 and 0.88 +/- 0.14, respectively. For a validation dataset, the figures were 0.78, 0.88 and 0.73, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This neoadjuvant strategy seems to correlate with a favorable long-term outcome in a subset of intestinal-type LAGA patients who achieve ypN0 features.

Gastrointestinal Fistula in Radical Distal Gastrectomy: Case-Control Study from a High-Volume Hospital

Background: Postoperative gastrointestinal fistula (PGF) is one of the main causes of abdominal infection and perioperative death. This study was designed to investigate the risk factors of PGF, anastomotic fistula (AF), and duodenal stump fistula (DSF) for patients who underwent radical distal gastrectomy. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective observational study, 2652 gastric cancer cases who received radical distal gastrectomy from 2010 to 2020 were selected as research subjects. Subsequently, we adopted the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis as statistical method to screen the risk factors for PGF, AF, and DSF, respectively. Results: In univariate analysis, gender (P = .022), operative time (P = .013), intraoperative blood loss (P < .001), tumor diameter (P = .002), and tumor stage (P < .001) were related to PGF. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the male (odds ratio [OR] = 2.691, P = .042), massive intraoperative hemorrhage (OR = 1.002, P = .008), and advanced tumor (OR = 2.522, P = .019) as independent predictors for PGF. Moreover, diabetes (OR = 4.497, P = .008) and massive intraoperative hemorrhage (OR = 1.003, P = .010) were proved to be associated with AF, while massive intraoperative hemorrhage (OR = 1.001, P = .050) and advanced tumor (OR = 6.485, P = .005) were independent risk factors of DSF. Conclusions: The gender, intraoperative hemorrhage, tumor stage, and diabetes were expected to be used as predictors of PGF for radical distal gastrectomy.

Effect of Circular Stapler Diameter on Anastomotic Leakage Rate and Stenosis After Open Total Gastrectomy With Esophagojejunostomy: A Substantive Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Series

Background

Anastomotic leakage (AL) and stenosis (AS) are two of the most severe postoperative complications after total gastrectomy with esophagojejunostomy. The stapler diameter can be chosen by the surgeon. Therefore, this study aims to assess the correlation between the stapler size as main independent variable as well as other different risk factors and AL and AS.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 356 patients who underwent open total gastrectomy between 2000 and 2018, mostly due to gastric cancer (96.9%). After propensity score matching the outcome parameters AL and AS were compared between the two stapler size groups. We also assessed different risk factors for AL and AS in cancer patients using multivariate analysis.

Results

Small circular stapler diameter (21/25 mm; n = 147 vs 28/29/31 mm; n = 209) was identified as a significant risk factor for the occurrence of AL (10% vs 4% for smaller vs larger staplers; P = 0.042). In multivariate analysis for the occurrence of AL an ASA score ≥ 3 could be identified as a risk factor (OR 2.85; 95% CI = 1.13-7.15; P = 0.026). Additionally, smaller stapler size could be identified as a risk factor for AS (OR small 1.00, OR large 0.24; 95% CI: 0.06-0.97; P = 0.045). AL was associated with lower survival (18.1 vs 38.16 months; P = 0.0119).

Conclusion

The application of a larger circular stapler for esophagojejunostomy in open total gastrectomy shows significantly lower rates of AL and stenosis. Therefore, the largest possible stapler diameter should be applied.

Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Plus Chemoradiation as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-institutional Analysis

OBJECTIVE

We compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus chemoradiation (CRT) for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GA).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The optimal neoadjuvant therapy regimen for resectable GA is not defined.

METHODS

Utilizing data from 2 high-volume cancer centers, we analyzed patients who underwent surgery for localized GA from 1/1/2000-12/31/2017. Standard CT regimens were used according to treatment period. We compared propensity matched cohorts based on age, sex, race, histology, and clinical stage.

RESULTS

Four-hundred five patients (age 62 ± 12 year, 58% male, 56% White) were analyzed. 231 (57%) received CRT and 174 (43%) received CT. Groups differed based on histopathologic characteristics including preoperative stage (p = 0.013). To control for these differences, propensity matched cohorts of 113 CT and 113 CRT patients were compared. CRT had similar frequencies of microscopically negative resections to CT (93% vs 91%, p = 0.81), but higher rates of complete pathologic response (15% vs 4%, p = 0.003) and lower pathologic stage (p = 0.002). Completion of intended perioperative therapy occurred in 63% of CT and 91% of CRT patients (p < 0.001). Median DFS was 45mo (95%CI: 20-70) in the CT group and 113mo (95%CI: 75-151) in the CRT group (p = 0.018). Median OS was 53mo (95%CI: 30-77) versus 120mo (95%CI: 101-138); p = 0.015.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multi-institutional comparison of neoadjuvant CT and CRT for resectable GA, CRT is associated with higher rates of completed perioperative therapy, higher rates of complete pathologic response, lower pathologic stage, and improved survival.Level of Evidence: Level III.

Tumor Regression Grade in Gastric Cancer After Preoperative Therapy

BACKGROUND

The Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition, now includes post-neoadjuvant therapy (ypTNM) staging for gastric cancer patients. Our purpose was to determine whether the tumor regression grade (TRG) of the primary tumor is useful for predicting the survival of these patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of an institutional database and identified patients with clinically non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy before gastrectomy. Pathology reports were reviewed, and TRG was classified as follows: 0 (complete response), 1 (viable tumor cells ≤ 1-2%), 2 (viable cells ≤ 50%), or 3 (viable cells > 50%).

RESULTS

Of the 356 patients identified, including 80 (23%) with a gastroesophageal junction tumor, 268 (75%) had undergone preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Fifty-six (16%) had TRG 0, 57 (16%) TRG 1, 128 (36%) TRG 2, and 115 (32%) TRG 3. No association between TRG and pretreatment factors was identified, except for signet-ring cell histologic type and tumor location. A higher TRG was associated with more advanced ypT and ypN categories (both p < 0.001), ypM1 (p = 0.004), and R1 resection (p = 0.052). The median overall survival (OS) duration was 6.6 years, and the 5-year OS rate was 54.1%. TRG 3 was associated with a shorter OS duration than were other TRG scores (p = 0.015), while the OS did not differ significantly among the TRG 0-2 groups (p = 0.803). On multivariable analysis, TRG was not associated with OS after adjustment for ypN status.

CONCLUSION

In gastric cancer patients who underwent preoperative therapy, TRG 3 was associated with advanced ypStage and R1 resection. Patients with TRG 3 had a shorter OS duration because of associated advanced ypStage, particularly ypN+ status.

Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Plus Chemoradiation as Preoperative Therapy for Resectable Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large, Single-Institution Experience

BACKGROUND

We compared oncologic outcomes of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with those of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus chemoradiation (CRT) for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

We compared oncologic and survival outcomes of patients who received CT or CRT for gastric adenocarcinoma at our institution between July 1995 and July 2018. We analyzed propensity score-matched cohorts based on age, sex, race, tumor histologic characteristics, and clinical stage.

RESULTS

We identified 440 patients (mean age 61 ± 12 years, 62% male, 55% white); 345 (78%) received CRT, and 95 (22%) received CT. The propensity score-matched cohorts included 65 patients who received CT and 65 who received CRT. The CRT group had similar frequencies of R1 resection margins to the CT group (7.7% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.75) but significantly higher frequency of pathologic complete response (27.7% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001). The CRT group had lower pathologic stages (p = 0.002). Median disease-free survival was 50.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.7-97.2) in the CT group and 122.1 months (95% CI: 69.0-175.1) in the CRT group (p = 0.07). Median overall survival was 70.7 months (95% CI: 23.9-117.5) in the CT group and 122.1 months (95% CI: 68.7-175.4) in the CRT group (p = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CT, CRT for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma is associated with higher rates of pathologic complete response and subsequent lower final pathologic stage, but survival differences are not significant. Ongoing investigation is necessary to better determine the optimal neoadjuvant therapy and identify patients who receive optimal benefit from CRT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Towards Personalization in the Curative Treatment of Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and has a high mortality rate. In the last decades, treatment strategy has shifted from an exclusive surgical approach to a multidisciplinary strategy. Treatment options for patients with resectable gastric cancer as recommended by different worldwide guidelines, include perioperative chemotherapy, pre- or postoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy. Although gastric cancer is a heterogeneous disease with respect to patient-, tumor-, and molecular characteristics, the current standard of care is still according to a one-size-fits-all approach. In this review, we discuss the background of the different treatment strategies in resectable gastric cancer including the current standard, the specific role of radiotherapy, and describe the current areas of research and potential strategies for personalization of therapy.

Impact of tumor regression grade on recurrence after preoperative chemoradiation and gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

It is unknown whether the degree of response to preoperative therapy correlates with locoregional recurrence (LR) or distant recurrence (DR) after resection of gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of gastric adenocarcinoma following chemotherapy and chemoradiation (1995-2015) were reviewed. The tumor regression grade (TRG) was defined by the percentage of viable tumor cells in the specimen (TRG0 = 0%; TRG1 = 1%-2%; TRG2 = 3%-50%; TRG3 ≥ 50%). The relationships among TRG, recurrence-free survival (RFS), LR, and DR were examined.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria (TRG0, 52 [21%]; TRG1, 49 [20%]; TRG2, 98 [40%]; TRG3, 48 [19%]). LR and DR occurred in 6.1% and 32.0% of patients, respectively. No patient with TRG0 experienced LR. R1 resection (6%-15%) and LR (6%-8%) rates were similar among TRG1-3 patients. R1 resection was associated with LR (hazard ratio [HR], 17.85; P < .001). ypN status (HR, 2.44; P = .004) and linitis plastica (HR, 2.90; P < .001) were associated with DR. TRG was not independently associated with RFS, LR, or DR.

CONCLUSIONS

TRG0 imparted excellent local control. However, TRG1-3 patients had similar R1 resection rates and therefore similar LR. DR is associated with ypN status and linitis plastica, not TRG.

Staging laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology in patients with early stage gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Staging laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology can detect occult metastatic disease prior to treatment of gastric cancer. The yield of peritoneal staging in patients with early stage disease is lacking. We assess the yield of peritoneal staging in early stage gastric cancer and its impact on survival.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a prospective database of patients who underwent staging laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology for gastric cancer at our institution between July 1995 and July 2018. Clinical stage was determined by endoscopic ultrasound, and early stage was defined as cT1-2 and cN0. Rates of positive cytology and carcinomatosis at time of laparoscopy were obtained. Univariate analyses were used to compare groups, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to assess survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Eight hundred sixty-seven patients underwent staging laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology; 56 were defined as early stage. Age was 61 ± 12 years, 66.4% were male, and 62.3% were white. Of the patients with early stage disease, 17.9% had either gross carcinomatosis (10.7%) and/or positive peritoneal cytology (10.9%). All cases of peritoneal disease were in patients with cT2 disease. There were no differences in age, gender, or race based on peritoneal disease (all p > 0.05). The presence of carcinomatosis or positive cytology significantly affected overall survival (p < 0.001), regardless of clinical T or N stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal staging identifies metastatic disease in a significant number of patients with early stage disease. Given its poor prognosis and alternate therapy options, independent staging laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology should be considered in patients with early stage gastric adenocarcinoma.

Yield of peritoneal cytology in staging patients with gastric and gastroesophageal cancer

Background

Guidelines for gastric and gastroesophageal (GE) cancer recommend staging laparoscopy (SL) with peritoneal cytology (PC). However, the reliability of PC is unknown. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity of PC.

Methods

We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent SL and PC for gastric and GE cancer. Test sensitivity of PC for detecting peritoneal disease was assessed. Survival analyses were used to examine the implication of PC.

Results

There were 1186 patients that underwent SL and PC; 282 (24%) were found with carcinomatosis. PC was analyzed in 214 (76%) of these patients and 77 (36%) were found to have no malignant cells. In this setting, PC had a sensitivity of 64% for confirming peritoneal disease. Those with peritoneal disease had a poorer 5‐year overall survival (5.8% vs 37.7%; P < .001). Those with positive PC without carcinomatosis had a similar survival to those with gross disease with and without cytological confirmation (both P > .05).

Conclusions

PC has limited sensitivity for detecting peritoneal disease. Positive PC alone carries a similar poor survival as in patients with gross carcinomatosis. Improvements in the identification of microscopic disease in peritoneal washings are needed.

Characteristics and Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients with Pathologic Complete Response to Preoperative Therapy

BACKGROUND

Pathologic complete response of a primary tumor (ypT0) after preoperative therapy is associated with improved overall survival (OS). However, whether other variables are associated with outcome for gastric cancer patients with ypT0 status is unknown.

METHODS

This study reviewed an institutional database of patients who underwent resection of gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma after preoperative therapy and identified patients with ypT0 status. Cox regression models were used to identify clinicopathologic predictors of OS.

RESULTS

Of 77 patients with ypT0 status identified in this study, 36 (47%) had gastroesophageal junction tumors. At presentation, 62 patients (81%) had clinical T3 disease, and 7 (9%) had clinical T4 disease. The clinical nodal status was positive (cN+) for 45 patients (58%). Preoperative chemoradiation was administered to 75 patients (97%). The median follow-up duration was 3.54 years. The median OS was 10 years, and the 5-year OS rate was 61%. Univariable analysis identified age of 65 years or older at the time of diagnosis, histologic grade, and ypN status as significant predictors of OS. Multivariable analysis confirmed age of 65 years or older [hazard ratio (HR), 4.26; p < 0.001] and persistent nodal disease (ypN+ status; HR, 5.12; p < 0.001) to be independently associated with OS. Clinical stage was not associated with survival. In the subset of ypT0N0 patients, no clinicopathologic feature was predictive of survival.

CONCLUSION

For gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients with ypT0 status after preoperative therapy, ypN+ status substantially reduced survival. Pretreatment clinical stage had no impact on OS for patients with a pathologic complete response.

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy induces primary-tumor complete response more frequently than chemotherapy alone in gastric cancer: analyses of the National Cancer Database 2006-2014 using propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

The benefit of preoperative chemoradiation (CXRT) over preoperative chemotherapy alone ("chemotherapy" hereafter) is unknown. By analyzing the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we investigated whether preoperative CXRT improves the incidence of primary tumor pathologic complete response (ypT0) and overall survival (OS) compared with preoperative chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients with non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent CXRT or chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy were included. Propensity score matching with a ratio of 1:1 was implemented to reduce selection bias. A conditional logistic regression model was used to compare incidences of ypT0 between groups, and Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare OS.

RESULTS

We identified 8464 patients. Median patient age was 63 years; 76% were male and 79% were white. ypT0 was observed in 16.1% of patients in the CXRT group and 6.6% in the chemotherapy group (p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, a total of 2408 patients were matched. CXRT was associated with a higher incidence of ypT0 (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.76-2.95; p < 0.0001) and higher frequency of R0 resection (92 vs. 86%; p < 0.001). However, CXRT was not associated with longer OS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.92-1.15; p = 0.63). Safety profiles (30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, and length of hospital stay) were equivalent between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of gastric cancer patients from the NCDB, CXRT was associated with a higher incidence of ypT0 and R0 resection compared with chemotherapy, although it was not associated with a longer OS.

CRITICS-II: a multicentre randomised phase II trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery versus neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in resectable gastric cancer

Background

Although radical surgery remains the cornerstone of cure in resectable gastric cancer, survival remains poor. Current evidence-based (neo)adjuvant strategies have shown to improve outcome, including perioperative chemotherapy, postoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy. However, these regimens suffer from poor patient compliance, particularly in the postoperative phase of treatment. The CRITICS-II trial aims to optimize preoperative treatment by comparing three treatment regimens: (1) chemotherapy, (2) chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy and (3) chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

In this multicentre phase II non-comparative study, patients with clinical stage IB-IIIC (TNM 8th edition) resectable gastric adenocarcinoma are randomised between: (1) 4 cycles of docetaxel+oxaliplatin+capecitabine (DOC), (2) 2 cycles of DOC followed by chemoradiotherapy (45Gy in combination with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin) or (3) chemoradiotherapy. Primary endpoint is event-free survival, 1 year after randomisation (events are local and/or regional recurrence or progression, distant recurrence, or death from any cause). Secondary endpoints include: toxicity, surgical outcomes, percentage radical (R0) resections, pathological tumour response, disease recurrence, overall survival, and health related quality of life. Exploratory endpoints include translational studies on predictive and prognostic biomarkers.

Discussion

The aim of this study is to select the most promising among three preoperative treatment arms in patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma. This treatment regimen will subsequently be compared with the standard therapy in a phase III trial.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov NCT02931890; registered 13 October 2016. Date of first enrolment: 21 December 2017.

Preoperative Therapy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma is Protective for Poor Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Complications After Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative complications (POC) are associated with poor oncologic outcomes in gastric cancer. We sought to evaluate the impact of POC on survival in patients with gastric cancer treated with upfront surgery (UpSurg) versus those treated with preoperative therapy (PreT).

METHODS

We analyzed data from a prospectively maintained database of patients who had undergone resection of their gastric cancer at our institution. Patients with T1N0 or M1 lesions, recurrent disease, and mortality within 90 days were excluded. Survival was compared between patients with and without POC in the UpSurg and PreT groups. Cox regression analyses were used to examine factors associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

A total of 421 patients underwent resection of gastric cancer: 30% underwent upfront surgery, and 51% had a POC. Among patients who had POCs, 71% were infectious and 53% were Clavien-Dindo grade III or IV. UpSurg patients with a POC had shorter OS (5-year, 47 vs. 85%; p < 0.001) and DFS (5-year, 46 vs. 76%; p < 0.001) than those without a POC. In contrast, there was no difference in OS (5-year, 57 vs. 63%; p = 0.77) and DFS (5-year, 52 vs. 52%; p = 0.52) between PreT patients with and without POC. Multivariable Cox regression model demonstrated that a POC in UpSurg patients had significant impact on DFS (2.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48-4.74]), whereas it did not in PreT patients (0.9 [95% CI 0.70-1.33]).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of preoperative therapy negated the impact of POCs on OS and DFS in patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer.

Nodal Downstaging in Gastric Cancer Patients: Promising Survival if ypN0 is Achieved

BACKGROUND

The American Joint Committee on Cancer's 8th edition introduced ypStage, a separate staging system for patients with gastric cancer having undergone preoperative therapy. Overall, ypN0 patients have better survival outcomes than ypN+ patients. However, whether patients with cN+/ypN0 disease ("downstaged N0") and those with cN0/ypN0 disease ("natural N0") have similar survival is unknown.

METHODS

An institutional database was reviewed to identify gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent potentially curative R0 resection after induction chemotherapy or chemoradiation. Patients were categorized into three groups based on nodal status: cN0/ypN0, cN+/ypN0, and ypN+. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to identify clinicopathologic factors associated with overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

We identified 316 patients who met the study criteria. Ninety-four patients (30%) had cN0/ypN0 disease, 93 (29%) had cN+/ypN0 disease, and 129 (41%) had ypN+ disease. The median OS was 7.7 years, and the 5-year OS was 60.3%. In the multivariate analysis, OS did not differ between the cN0/ypN0 and cN+/ypN0 patients (hazard ratio, 0.90 [95% CI 0.54-1.48]; p = 0.666), but it was shorter in ypN+ patients (hazard ratio, 1.82 [95% CI 1.15-2.87]; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In gastric cancer patients who underwent preoperative therapy, we found similar OS in cN0/ypN0 and cN+/ypN0 patients. Because ypN+ patients had poor OS, achieving ypN0 status is an important hallmark demonstrating the effectiveness of preoperative therapy for gastric cancer.