Phase 2 Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Stereotactic Body Proton Therapy for High-Risk, Medically Inoperable, Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical outcomes of proton beam therapy for inoperable stage I-IIA non-small cell lung cancer: Japanese nationwide registry study

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy is the standard treatment for unresectable stage I-IIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). One treatment option within radiotherapy is proton beam therapy (PBT). Currently, a prospective observational study is being conducted at all proton therapy centers in Japan as part of a proton beam all-case registry. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of PBT for inoperable stage I-IIA NSCLC.

METHODS

We included patients with stage I-IIA (UICC 8th) NSCLC who had started PBT between May 2016 and June 2020. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cumulative incidence of local failure (LF), and adverse events were evaluated. Prognostic factors were compared using log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. The cumulative incidence curves were compared using Gray's test.

RESULTS

A total of 309 patients were evaluated. The median follow-up period was 47 months, calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. The 3/5-year OS was 62.7 %/47.7 %, PFS was 52.9 %/40.0 %, and LF was 14.4 %/22.1 %. According to the stage, 3-year OS, PFS, and LF were 69.6 %, 58.7 %, 13.3 %, respectively, for stage IA; 55.3 %, 41.6 %, 15.6 %, respectively, for stage IB; 33.9 %, 41.5 %, 25.6 %, respectively, for stage IIA. Female sex and good performance status, absence of interstitial pneumonia, absence of double cancer, and T1 stage were favorable prognostic factors for OS in a multivariate analysis. Grade ≥ 4 adverse events were not observed.

CONCLUSION

This study provided real-world treatment outcomes of PBT for inoperable stage I-IIA NSCLC in Japan.

The current state of proton radiotherapy

Radiotherapy is indicated for nearly all cancers and at all stages in one form or another. More than half of all cancer patients are treated with radiation at some point in their cancer treatment. Conventional X-ray (photon) based radiotherapy does have a number of physical limitations which were theorized to be overcome by instead employing proton based radiotherapy. The late 1990s and early 2000s saw a rapid adoption in proton therapy as many speculated a greatly improved therapeutic window compared with photon therapy. Only a few randomized clinical trials have been reported, but to-date proton therapy has not shown to improve cancer control metrics. There is improved treatment related toxicity which may be clinically meaningful in some scenarios, but further expansion and wide spread utilization of the technology may be drastically limited by the substantially higher start up and operational costs of a proton center. Nonetheless, proton therapy may be beneficial in select scenarios which warrant individualized consideration.

Increased cell killing effect in neutron capture enhanced proton beam therapy

Thermal neutrons generated in the body during proton beam therapy (PBT) can be used to cause boron neutron capture reactions and have recently been proposed as neutron capture enhanced PBT (NCEPBT). However, the cell killing effect of NCEPBT remains underexplored. Here, we show an increase in the cell killing effect of NCEPBT. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we showed that neutrons generated by proton beam irradiation are uniformly spread on tissue culture plates. Human salivary gland tumor cell line (HSG), human osteosarcoma cell line (MG63), human tongue squamous cell carcinoma cell line (SAS), and human malignant melanoma cell line (G-361) were irradiated with X-rays, proton beams, and proton beams with 10B-enriched boronophenylalanine (boron concentration of 20 and 80 ppm). The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values of proton beams alone, proton beams with 20 ppm boron, and proton beams with 80 ppm boron for HSG, MG63, SAS, and G-361 were 1.02, 1.07, and 1.23; 1.01, 1.08, and 1.44; 1.05, 1.09, and 1.46; and 1.04, 1.13, and 1.63, respectively. NCEPBT with high boron concentration showed high RBE and a high sensitizing effect. Our results confirm an increase in the cell killing effect of NCEPBT, should aid in its clinical use, and warrant its further investigation.

Proton Therapy for Spinal Tumors: A Consensus Statement From the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group

PURPOSE

Proton beam therapy (PBT) plays an important role in the management of primary spine tumors. The purpose of this consensus statement was to summarize safe and optimal delivery of PBT for spinal tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Skull Base/Central nervous system/Sarcoma Subcommittee consisting of radiation oncologists and medical physicists with specific expertise in spinal irradiation developed expert recommendations discussing treatment planning considerations and current approaches in the treatment of primary spinal tumors.

RESULTS

Computed tomography simulation: factors that require significant consideration include (1) patient comfort, (2) setup reproducibility and stability, and (3) accessibility of appropriate beam angles.

SPINE STABILIZATION HARDWARE

If present, hardware should be placed with cross-links well above/below the level of the primary tumor to reduce the metal burden at the level of the tumor bed. New materials that can reduce uncertainties include polyether-ether-ketone and composite polyether-ether-ketone-carbon fiber implants.

FIELD ARRANGEMENT

Appropriate beam selection is required to ensure robust target coverage and organ at risk sparing. Commonly, 2 to 4 treatment fields, typically from posterior and/or posterior-oblique directions, are used.

TREATMENT PLANNING METHODOLOGY

Robust optimization is recommended for all pencil beam scanning plans (the preferred treatment modality) and should consider setup uncertainty (between 3 and 7 mm) and range uncertainty (3%-3.5%). In the presence of metal hardware, use of an increased range uncertainty up to 5% is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

The Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Skull Base/Central nervous system/Sarcoma Subcommittee has developed recommendations to enable centers to deliver PBT safely and effectively for the management of primary spinal tumors.

Advances in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer

ABSTRACT

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivers curative-intent radiation to patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and inoperable thoracic lesions. With improved techniques in tumor delineation, motion management, and delivery of radiation treatments, the therapeutic window within the thorax is able to be maximized. Ongoing technological advances enable highly targeted ablative radiation therapy while sparing adjacent sensitive organs at risk. Further applications of SBRT with combinatorial immunotherapy, the usage of particle therapy, and for patients with more advanced stages of lung cancer and other histologies mark exciting possibilities for the role of SBRT within the thorax.

New diagnostic and nonsurgical local treatment modalities for early stage lung cancer

This paper highlights developments in diagnostic and nonsurgical local treatment modalities that have changed the management of early-stage lung cancer. These innovations aim to enhance diagnostic accuracy, minimize invasiveness, and improve patient outcomes. Liquid biopsies are emerging as promising tools for non-invasive diagnosis and monitoring, enabling earlier intervention without being standardized yet as well as not yet anchored in the guidelines. Endobronchial navigation has emerged as an innovative tool. By combining electromagnetic or GPS-like technology with 3D imaging and a steerable catheter, it enables accurate biopsy of small, peripheral lesions that were once challenging to sample, with a very low pneumothorax rate. Regarding nonsurgical treatments, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) continues to shine as a non-invasive local treatment modality for early-stage lung cancer and is the guideline-recommended standard-of-care for inoperable patients and patients refusing the risk of surgical resection. The low toxicity and excellent local control has made it an attractive alternative to surgery even in fitter patients. Percutaneous ablative techniques utilising energies such as microwave or pulse-field electroporation are options for patients who are not candidates for surgery or SBRT. Bronchoscopic ablation delivers the same energies but with a very lower pneumothorax rate and it is therefore also open to patients with multiple and bilateral lesions.

NRG Oncology and Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group Patterns of Practice Survey and Consensus Recommendations on Pencil-Beam Scanning Proton Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Thoracic Malignancies

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and hypofractionation using pencil-beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy (PBSPT) is an attractive option for thoracic malignancies. Combining the advantages of target coverage conformity and critical organ sparing from both PBSPT and SBRT, this new delivery technique has great potential to improve the therapeutic ratio, particularly for tumors near critical organs. Safe and effective implementation of PBSPT SBRT/hypofractionation to treat thoracic malignancies is more challenging than the conventionally fractionated PBSPT because of concerns of amplified uncertainties at the larger dose per fraction. The NRG Oncology and Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Thoracic Subcommittee surveyed proton centers in the United States to identify practice patterns of thoracic PBSPT SBRT/hypofractionation. From these patterns, we present recommendations for future technical development of proton SBRT/hypofractionation for thoracic treatment. Among other points, the recommendations highlight the need for volumetric image guidance and multiple computed tomography-based robust optimization and robustness tools to minimize further the effect of uncertainties associated with respiratory motion. Advances in direct motion analysis techniques are urgently needed to supplement current motion management techniques.

Temporal Evolution and Diagnostic Diversification of Patients Receiving Proton Therapy in the United States: A Ten-Year Trend Analysis (2012 to 2021) From the National Association for Proton Therapy

PURPOSE

The National Association for Proton Therapy conducted 8 surveys of all operational United States proton centers (2012-2021) and analyzed the patients treated, diagnoses, and treatment complexity to evaluate trends and diversification of patients receiving proton therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Detailed surveys were sent in 2015, which requested data from 2012 to 2014, and then annually thereafter to active proton centers in the United States. The numbers of patient treated at each center for the preceding calendar year(s) were collated for tumors in the following categories: central nervous system, intraocular, pituitary, skull base/skeleton, head/neck, lung, retroperitoneal/soft tissue sarcoma, pediatric (solid tumors in children of age ≤18), gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract, female pelvic, prostate, breast, and "other." Complexity levels were assessed using Current Procedural Terminology codes 77520-77525.

RESULTS

Survey response rates were excellent (100% in 2015 to 94.9% in 2021); additional publicly available information provided near-complete information on all centers. Trend comparisons between 2012 and 2021 showed that the total annual number of patients treated with protons gradually increased from 5377 to 15,829. The largest numeric increases were for head/neck (316 to 2303; 7.3-fold), breast (93 to 1452; 15.6-fold), and gastrointestinal tumors (170 to 1259; 7.4-fold). Patient numbers also increased significantly for central nervous system (598 to 1743; 2.9-fold), pediatric (685 to 1870; 2.7-fold), and skull base tumors (179 to 514; 2.9-fold). For prostate cancer, the percentage of proton-treated patients decreased from 43.4% to 25.0% of the total. Simple compensated treatments decreased from 43% in 2012 to 7% in 2021, whereas intermediate complexity treatments increased from 45% to 73%.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of patients treated with protons is gradually increasing, with a substantial proportionate decline in patients with prostate cancer receiving proton therapy. The number of patients treated for "commonly accepted" indications for protons (eg, pediatric, central nervous system, and skull base tumors) is gradually increasing. Greater proportional increases were observed for breast, lung, head/neck, and gastrointestinal tumors. Treatment complexity is gradually increasing over time.

Long-term survival outcomes and quality of life of image-guided proton therapy for operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A phase 2 study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study evaluated long-term efficacy, safety, and changes in quality of life (QOL) of patients after image-guided proton therapy (IGPT) for operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-institutional prospective phase 2 study enrolled patients with operable histologically confirmed stage IA or IB NSCLC (7th edition of UICC). The prescribed dose was 66 Gy relative biological effectiveness equivalents (GyRBE) in 10 fractions for peripheral lesions, or 72.6 GyRBE in 22 fractions for central lesions. The primary endpoint was the 3-year overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included disease control, toxicity, and changes in QOL score.

RESULTS

We enrolled 43 patients (median age: 68 years; range, 47-79 years) between July 2013 to January 2021, of whom 41 (95 %) had peripheral lesions and 27 (63 %) were stage IA. OS, local control, and progression-free survival rates were 95 % (95 % CI: 83-99), 95 % (82-99), and 86 % (72-94), respectively, at 3 years, and 83 % (66-92), 95 % (82-99), and 77 % (60-88), respectively, at 7 years. Four patients (9 %) developed grade 2, and one patient (2 %) developed grade 3 radiation pneumonitis. No other grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed. In the QOL analysis, global QOL remained favorable; however, approximately 40 % of patients reported dyspnea at 3 and 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that IGPT provides effective disease control and survival in operable stage I NSCLC, particularly for peripheral lesions. Moreover, toxicity associated with IGPT was minimal, and patients reported favorable QOL.

Predicting the Effect of Proton Beam Therapy Technology on Pulmonary Toxicities for Patients With Locally Advanced Lung Cancer Enrolled in the Proton Collaborative Group Prospective Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to predict the probability of grade ≥2 pneumonitis or dyspnea within 12 months of receiving conventionally fractionated or mildly hypofractionated proton beam therapy for locally advanced lung cancer using machine learning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Demographic and treatment characteristics were analyzed for 965 consecutive patients treated for lung cancer with conventionally fractionated or mildly hypofractionated (2.2-3 Gy/fraction) proton beam therapy across 12 institutions. Three machine learning models (gradient boosting, additive tree, and logistic regression with lasso regularization) were implemented to predict Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 grade ≥2 pulmonary toxicities using double 10-fold cross-validation for parameter hyper-tuning without leak of information. Balanced accuracy and area under the curve were calculated, and 95% confidence intervals were obtained using bootstrap sampling.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 70 years (range, 20-97), and they had predominantly stage IIIA or IIIB disease. They received a median dose of 60 Gy in 2 Gy/fraction, and 46.4% received concurrent chemotherapy. In total, 250 (25.9%) had grade ≥2 pulmonary toxicity. The probability of pulmonary toxicity was 0.08 for patients treated with pencil beam scanning and 0.34 for those treated with other techniques (P = 8.97e-13). Use of abdominal compression and breath hold were highly significant predictors of less toxicity (P = 2.88e-08). Higher total radiation delivered dose (P = .0182) and higher average dose to the ipsilateral lung (P = .0035) increased the likelihood of pulmonary toxicities. The gradient boosting model performed the best of the models tested, and when demographic and dosimetric features were combined, the area under the curve and balanced accuracy were 0.75 ± 0.02 and 0.67 ± 0.02, respectively. After analyzing performance versus the number of data points used for training, we observed that accuracy was limited by the number of observations.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest analysis of prospectively enrolled patients with lung cancer assessing pulmonary toxicities from proton therapy to date, advanced machine learning methods revealed that pencil beam scanning, abdominal compression, and lower normal lung doses can lead to significantly lower probability of developing grade ≥2 pneumonitis or dyspnea.

Lobectomy versus proton therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Lobectomy is the standard treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In recent years, an increasing number of patients with lung cancer have been treated using proton therapy (PT). We conducted a propensity score-matched analysis to compare the treatment outcomes of these 2 modalities.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from 275 patients with histologically confirmed clinical stage I NSCLC who underwent lobectomy (n = 206) or PT (n = 69) at our institution from July 2013 to December 2020. The end points were overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival, recurrence-free survival (RFS), local control, regional lymph node control, and distant control. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias in the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The matched cohort consisted of 59 patients who underwent lobectomy and 59 patients who underwent PT with a median follow-up period of 50 months. There were no significant differences in OS (P = .26), cause-specific survival (P = .33), RFS (P = .53), local control (P = .41), regional lymph node control (P = .98), and distant control (P = .31). In the lobectomy and PT groups, the 5-year OS rate was 85.8% and 79.1%, respectively, the RFS rate was 82.3% and 77.8%, and the local control rate was 92.1% and 96.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no difference in survival or disease control between lobectomy and PT in patients with histologically confirmed clinical stage I NSCLC. Despite these findings, the potential for unmeasured confounding factors remains, and randomized control trials are needed to better compare these treatment modalities.

Advances and Challenges in Conducting Clinical Trials With Proton Beam Therapy

Advances in proton therapy have garnered much attention and speculation in recent years as the indications for proton therapy have grown beyond pediatric, prostate, spine, and ocular tumors. To achieve and maintain consistent access to this cancer treatment and to ensure the future viability and availability of proton centers in the United States, a call for evidence has been heard and answered by proton radiation oncologists. Answers provided in this review include the evolution of proton therapy research, rationale for proton clinical trial design, challenges in and barriers to the conduct of proton therapy research, and other unique considerations for the study of proton therapy.

Proton versus photon radiation therapy: A clinical review

While proton radiation therapy offers substantially better dose distribution characteristics than photon radiation therapy in certain clinical applications, data demonstrating a quantifiable clinical advantage is still needed for many treatment sites. Unfortunately, the number of patients treated with proton radiation therapy is still comparatively small, in some part due to the lack of evidence of clear benefits over lower-cost photon-based treatments. This review is designed to present the comparative clinical outcomes between proton and photon therapies, and to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the effectiveness of proton radiation therapy.

An Integrated Physical Optimization Framework for Proton Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy FLASH Treatment Planning Allows Dose, Dose Rate, and Linear Energy Transfer Optimization Using Patient-Specific Ridge Filters

PURPOSE

Patient-specific ridge filters provide a passive means to modulate proton energy to obtain a conformal dose. Here we describe a new framework for optimization of filter design and spot maps to meet the unique demands of ultrahigh-dose-rate (FLASH) radiation therapy. We demonstrate an integrated physical optimization Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) (IPO-IMPT) approach for optimization of dose, dose-averaged dose rate (DADR), and dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET_d).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We developed an inverse planning software to design patient-specific ridge filters that spread the Bragg peak from a fixed-energy, 250-MeV beam to a proximal beam-specific planning target volume. The software defines patient-specific ridge filter pin shapes and uses a Monte Carlo calculation engine, based on Geant4, to provide dose and LET influence matrices. Plan optimization, using matRAD, accommodates the IPO-IMPT objective function considering dose, dose rate, and LET simultaneously with minimum monitor unit constraints. The framework enables design of both regularly spaced and sparse-optimized ridge filters, from which some pins are omitted to allow faster delivery and selective LET optimization. To demonstrate the framework, we designed ridge filters for 3 example patients with lung cancer and optimized the plans using IPO-IMPT.

RESULTS

The IPO-IMPT framework selectively spared the organs at risk by reducing LET and increasing dose rate, relative to IMPT planning. Sparse-optimized ridge filters were superior to regularly spaced ridge filters in dose rate. Depending on which parameter is prioritized, volume distributions and histograms for dose, DADR, and LET_d, using evaluation structures specific to heart, lung, and esophagus, show high levels of FLASH dose-rate coverage and/or reduced LET_d, while maintaining dose coverage within the beam specific planning target volume.

CONCLUSIONS

This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the feasibility of using an IPO-IMPT framework to accomplish proton FLASH stereotactic body proton therapy, accounting for dose, DADR, and LET_d simultaneously.

Research landscape and trends of lung cancer radiotherapy: A bibliometric analysis

BACKGROUND

radiotherapy is one of the major treatments for lung cancer and has been a hot research area for years. This bibliometric analysis aims to present the research trends on lung cancer radiotherapy.

METHOD

On August 31, 2022, the authors identified 9868 articles on lung cancer radiotherapy by the Web of Science (Science Citation Indexing Expanded database) and extracted their general information and the total number of citations. A bibliometric analysis was carried out to present the research landscape, demonstrate the research trends, and determine the most cited papers (top-papers) as well as top-journals on lung cancer radiotherapy. After that, the authors analyzed the recent research hotspots based on the latest publications in top-journals.

RESULTS

These 9868 papers were cited a total of 268,068 times. "Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer" published in 2017 by Antonia et al.was the most cited article (2110 citations). Among the journals, New England Journal of Medicine was most influential. Moreover, J. Clin. Oncol. and Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. was both influential and productive. Corresponding authors represented the USA (2610 articles) and China mainland (2060 articles) took part in most publications and articles with corresponding authors from Netherlands were most cited (46.12 citations per paper). Chemoradiotherapy was the hottest research area, and stereotactic body radiotherapy has become a research hotspot since 2006. Radiotherapy plus immunotherapy has been highly focused since 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

This bibliometric analysis comprehensively and quantitatively presents the research trends and hotspots based on 9868 relevant articles, and further suggests future research directions. The researchers can benefit in selecting journals and in finding potential collaborators. This study can help researchers gain a comprehensive picture of the research landscape, historical development, and recent hotspots in lung cancer radiotherapy and can provide inspiration for future research.

Pan-Canadian consensus recommendations for proton beam therapy access in Canada

PURPOSE

Proton Beam Therapy (PBT)is a treatment option for select cancer patients. It is currently not available in Canada. Assessment and referral processes for out-of-country treatment for eligible patients vary by jurisdiction, leading to variability in access to this treatment for Canadian cancer patients. The purpose of this initiative was to develop a framework document to inform consistent and equitable PBT access for appropriate patients through the creation of pan-Canadian PBT access consensus recommendations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A modified Delphiprocess was used to develop pan-Canadian recommendations with input from 22 PBT clinical and administrative experts across all provinces, external peer-review by provincial cancer and system partners, and feedback from a targeted community consultation. This was conducted by electronic survey and live discussion. Consensus threshold was set at 70% agreement.

RESULTS

Fourconsensus rounds resulted in a final set of 27 recommendations divided into three categories: patient eligibility (n = 9); program level (n = 10); and system level (n = 8). Patient eligibility included: anatomic site (n = 4), patient characteristics (n = 3), clinical efficacy (n = 2). Program level included: regulatory and staff requirements (n = 5), equipment and technologies (n = 4), quality assurance (n = 1). System level included: referral process (n = 5), costing, budget impact and quality adjusted life years (n = 2), eligible patient estimates (n = 1). Recommendations were released nationally in June 2021 and distributed to all 43 cancer programs in Canada.

CONCLUSION

A pan-Canadian consensus-building approach was successful in creating an evidence-based, peer-reviewed suite of recommendations thatsupportapplication of consistent clinical criteria to inform treatment options, facility set-up and access to high quality proton therapy.

Clinical Outcomes Following Proton and Photon Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

The current study reports the clinical outcomes of proton and photon stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage lung cancer. Out of 202 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 34 received proton SBRT and 168 received photon SBRT. Patients at high risk of developing post-SBRT radiation pneumonitis tended to receive proton SBRT. Oncologic outcomes and toxicity profiles were comparable between treatment modalities. Proton SBRT could be considered for patients with high risk of radiation pneumonitis.

Abstract

We aimed to report the clinical outcomes following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using photon or proton equipment in early-stage lung cancer. We retrospectively reviewed 202 cT1-2N0M0 lung cancer patients who underwent SBRT with 60 Gy in four consecutive fractions between 2010 and 2019 at our institution: 168 photon SBRT and 34 proton SBRT. Patients who underwent proton SBRT had relatively poor baseline lung condition compared to those who underwent photon SBRT. Clinical outcomes were comparable between treatment modalities: 5-year local control (90.8% vs. 83.6%, p = 0.602); progression-free survival (61.6% vs. 57.8%, p = 0.370); overall survival (51.7% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.475); and cause-specific survival (70.3% vs. 62.6%, p = 0.618). There was no statistically significant difference in grade ≥ 2 toxicities: radiation pneumonitis (19.6% vs. 26.4%, p = 0.371); musculoskeletal (13.7% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.264); and skin (3.6% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.604). In the binary logistic regression analysis of grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis, poor performance status and poor baseline diffusion capacity of lung for carbon monoxide were significant. To summarize, though patients with high risk of developing lung toxicity underwent proton SBRT more frequently, the SBRT techniques resulted in comparable oncologic outcomes with similar toxicity profiles. Proton SBRT could be considered for patients at high risk of radiation pneumonitis.

Surgical resection, radiotherapy and percutaneous thermal ablation for treatment of stage 1 non-small cell lung cancer: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) makes up the majority of lung cancer cases. Currently, surgical resection is the gold standard of treatment. However, as patients are becoming medically more complex presenting with advanced disease, minimally invasive image-guided percutaneous ablations are gaining popularity. Therefore, comparison of surgical, ablative and second-line external beam therapies will help clinicians, as management of NSCLC changes. We will conduct a meta-analysis, reviewing literature investigating these therapies in adult patients diagnosed with stage 1 NSCLC, with neither hilar nor mediastinal nodal involvement, confirmed either through cytology or histology regardless of type.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane) from their inception to January 2021 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs and cohort studies comparing survival and clinical outcomes between any two interventions (lobectomy, wedge resection, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery/robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation and consolidated radiation therapies (external beam radiation therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and 3D conformal radiation therapy). The primary outcomes will include cancer-specific survival, lung disease-free survival, locoregional recurrence, death, toxicity and non-target organ injury. We will also search published and unpublished studies in trial registries and will review references of included studies for possible inclusion. Risk of bias will be assessed using tools developed by the Cochrane collaboration. Two reviewers will independently assess the eligibility of studies and conduct the corresponding risk of bias assessments. For each outcome, given enough studies, we will conduct a network meta-analysis. Finally, we will use the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis tool to assess quality of the evidence for each of the primary outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

We aim to share our findings through high-impact peer review. As interventional techniques become more popular, it will be important for providers in multidisciplinary teams caring for these patients to receive continuing medical education related to these interventions. Data will be made available to readers.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021276629.

Evaluation of response to stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors

OBJECTIVE

Recommendations for surveillance after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are not well defined. Recently, PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST) have been proposed as a new standardized method to assess radiotherapeutic response both quantitatively and metabolically. The aim of this study was to evaluate therapeutic response following SBRT in early-stage NSCLC patients by comparing PERCIST with the currently widely used RECIST.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-nine patients with early-stage NSCLC who had been prescribed SBRT were studied. Responses of lesion were evaluated using CT and 18F-FDG PET according to the RECIST and PERCIST methods. PET-CT scans were obtained before SBRT and 3-6 months after SBRT. Associations between overall survival (OS) and clinicopathologic results (histology, tumor location, tumor size, lymphatic invasion, clinical stage, and radiotherapeutic responses in RECIST and PERCIST) were statistically analyzed. The median patient follow-up was 30 months.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients had stage IA, 9 stage IB, 10 stage IIA, and 17 stage IIB biopsy-proven NSCLC. Three-year OS was 79.6%. CT scans indicated three regional recurrences. PET-CT/chest indicated three regional recurrences and distant metastasis. Significant differences were observed in response classification between RECIST and PERCIST (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P = 0.0041). Univariate analysis showed that clinical stage, RECIST, and PERCIST were significant factors associated with OS, whereas by multivariate analysis PERCIST was the only predictor of OS. SMD, PMD/PMR, and CMR in PERCIST criteria were indicative of a 9.900-fold increase in the risk of OS in early NSCLC patients [risk ratio, 9.900 (95% CI, 1.040-21.591); P = 0.001].

CONCLUSION

RECIST based on the anatomic size reduction rate did not demonstrate the correlation between radiotherapeutic response and prognosis in patients with early-stage NSCLC receiving SBRT. However, PERCIST was shown as the strongest independent predictor of outcomes. PERCIST might be considered more suitable for the evaluation of NSCLC tumor response to SBRT than RECIST.

GOECP/SEOR radiotheraphy guidelines for non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease accounting for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Only 17% of patients are diagnosed at an early stage. Treatment is multidisciplinary and radiotherapy plays a key role in all stages of the disease. More than 50% of patients with NSCLC are treated with radiotherapy (curative-intent or palliative). Technological advances-including highly conformal radiotherapy techniques, new immobilization and respiratory control systems, and precision image verification systems-allow clinicians to individualize treatment to maximize tumor control while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. Novel therapeutic regimens such as moderate hypofractionation and advanced techniques such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have reduced the number of radiotherapy sessions. The integration of SBRT into routine clinical practice has radically altered treatment of early-stage disease. SBRT also plays an increasingly important role in oligometastatic disease. The aim of the present guidelines is to review the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of localized, locally-advanced, and metastatic NSCLC. We review the main radiotherapy techniques and clarify the role of radiotherapy in routine clinical practice. These guidelines are based on the best available evidence. The level and grade of evidence supporting each recommendation is provided.

Imaging Strategies in Proton Therapy for Thoracic Tumors: A Mini Review

Proton beam therapy (PBT) is often more attractive for its high gradient dose distributions than other treatment modalities with external photon beams. However, in thoracic lesions treated particularly with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton beams, several dosimetric issues are addressed. The PBS approach may lead to large hot or cold spots in dose distributions delivered to the patients, potentially affecting the tumor control and/or increasing normal tissue side effects. This delivery method particularly benefits image-guided approaches. Our paper aims at reviewing imaging strategies and their technological trends for PBT in thoracic lesions. The focus is on the use of imaging strategies in simulation, planning, positioning, adaptation, monitoring, and delivery of treatment and how changes in the anatomy of thoracic tumors are handled with the available tools and devices in PBT. Starting from bibliographic research over the past 5 years, retrieving 174 papers, major key questions, and implemented solutions were identified and discussed; the results aggregated and presented following the methodology of analysis of expert interviews.

Clinical Outcomes After Proton Beam Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis of a Multi-institutional Prospective Registry

Purpose

For most disease sites, level 1 evidence is lacking for proton beam therapy (PBT). By identifying target populations that would benefit most from PBT, prospective registries could overcome many of the challenges in clinical trial enrollment. Herein, we report clinical outcomes of patients treated with PBT for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC).

Methods and Materials

Data were obtained from the multi-institutional prospective database of the Proton Collaborative Group (PCG). Inclusion criteria of our study were stage III de novo or recurrent LA-NSCLC, use of PBT, and availability of follow-up data. Overall survival (OS) time was calculated from the start of treatment until death or last follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for groups of interest and compared with log-rank tests. Cox regression modeling was used to evaluate the multivariate association between selected covariates and OS.

Results

A total of 195 patients were included in the analysis. PBT was given with a median equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) of 63.8 Gy (relative biological effectiveness). Pencil beam scanning was used in 20% of treatments. Treatment-related grade 3 adverse events were rare: 1 pneumonitis, 2 dermatitis, and 3 esophagitis. No grade 4 events were reported. Two cardiac-related grade 5 events occurred in patients with multiple risk factors. The median follow-up time for living patients was 37.1 months and the median OS was 19.0 months. On multivariate analysis, good performance status (hazard ratio, 0.27; [95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.46]; P < .0001), pencil beam scanning use (0.55; [0.31-0.97]; P = .04), and increased EQD2 (0.80; [0.71-0.90] - per 10 Gy increase; P = .0002) were associated with decreased mortality.

Conclusions

PBT appears to yield low rates of adverse events with an OS similar to other retrospective studies on PBT for LA-NSCLC. PBS use and increased EQD2 can potentially improve OS.

A Promising Treatment Strategy for Lung Cancer: A Combination of Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide despite advances in treatment. In the past few decades, radiotherapy has achieved outstanding technical advances and is being widely used as a definitive, prophylactic, or palliative treatment of patients with lung cancer. The anti-tumor effects of radiotherapy are considered to result in DNA damage in cancer cells. Moreover, recent evidence has demonstrated another advantage of radiotherapy: the induction of anti-tumor immune responses, which play an essential role in cancer control. In contrast, radiotherapy induces an immunosuppressive response. These conflicting reactions after radiotherapy suggest that maximizing immune response to radiotherapy by combining immunotherapy has potential to achieve more effective anti-tumor response than using each alone. Immune checkpoint molecules, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1, and their inhibitors, have attracted significant attention for overcoming the immunosuppressive conditions in patients with cancer. Therefore, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy is promising. Emerging preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the rationale for these combination strategies. In this review, we outlined evidence suggesting that combination of radiotherapy, including particle therapy using protons and carbon ions, with immunotherapy in lung cancer treatment could be a promising treatment strategy.

Implementation of MR-linac and proton therapy in two radiotherapy departments in The Netherlands: Recommendations based on lessons learned

Recently, two new treatment techniques, i.e. proton therapy and MR-linac based radiotherapy (RT), have been introduced in Dutch RT centres with major impact on daily practice. The content and context of these techniques are frequently described in scientific literature while little is reported about the implementation phase. This process is complex due to a variety of aspects, such as the involvement of multiple stakeholders, significant unpredictability in the start-up phase, the impact of the learning curve, standard operating procedures under development, new catchment areas, and extensive training programs. Insight about implementation in daily care is utterly important for clinics that are about to introduce these new technologies in order to prevent that every centre needs to reinvent the wheel. This position paper gives an overview of the implementation of proton therapy and MR-linac based RT in two large academic RT centres in the Netherlands, i.e. Maastro and Radboudumc respectively. With this paper we aim to report our lessons learned, in order to facilitate other RT centres that consider introducing these and other new techniques in their departments.

[The role of proton therapy in esophageal cancer]

Because of the physical properties of proton beam radiation therapy (PT), which allows energy to be deposited at a specific depth with a rapid energy fall-off beyond that depth, PT has several theoretical advantages over photon radiation therapy for esophageal cancer (EC). Protons have the potential to reduce the dose to healthy tissue and to more safely allow treatment of tumors near critical organs, dose escalation, trimodal treatment, and re-irradiation. In recent years, larger multicenter retrospective studies have been published showing excellent survival rates, lower than expected toxicities and even better outcomes with PT than with photon radiotherapy even using IMRT or VMAT techniques. Although PT was associated with reduced toxicities, postoperative complications, and hospital stays compared to photon radiation therapy, these studies all had inherent biases in relation with patient selection for PT. These observations were recently confirmed by a randomized phase II study in locally advanced EC that showed significantly reduced toxicities with protons compared with IMRT. Currently, two randomized phase III trials (NRG-GI006 in the US and PROTECT in Europe) are being conducted to confirm whether protons could become the standard of care in locally advanced and resectable esophageal cancers.

Automated robust SBPT planning using EUD-based prediction of SBRT plan for patients with lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the quality of robust stereotactic body proton therapy (RSBPT) plans generated by one-clicking scripting method for patients with lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed on fifty lung cancer patients whose plan with robustly stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Thirty out of fifty patients were used for training to build a regression model, based on robust SBRT reference doses, to predict EUD values of ROIs for robust SBPT planning. Thereafter, robust SBPT plans with both automated EUD-Based mimicking (Automated Robust Proton ARP) and manual (Manual Robust Proton MRP) methods were evaluated in the remaining 20 patients. Plans were compared in terms of dosimetric parameters and planning time.

RESULTS

A statistically significantly improvement in target dose fall off was observed for ARP plans compare to MRP plans (Dose fall off: 135 for MRP and 88 for ARP, p < 0.01), while no differences in target coverage and conformity. A statistically significantly reduce in normal lung tissue were observed for ARP plans compare to MRP plans (Lung [D_mean cGy (RBE)]: MRP: 478 vs. ARP: 351, p < 0.01; Lung [V_{5Gy (RBE)} (%)]: MRP: 16.1 vs. ARP: 12.1, p < 0.01; Lung [V_{20Gy (RBE)} (%)]: MRP: 8.5 vs. ARP: 6.8, p < 0.01). Planning time was reduced for ARP plans compare to MRP plans (optimization time: 12 min for MRP vs. 8 min for ARP; total plan time: 23 min for MRP vs. 18 min for ARP).

CONCLUSION

The automated robust SBPT plans using EUD-Based mimicking of SBRT reference dose improve target dose fall off, reduced the radiation doses to the lungs, reduce planning time, which might be beneficial for patient with lung cancer in clinical.

Normal Tissue Injury Induced by Photon and Proton Therapies: Gaps and Opportunities

Despite technological advances in radiation therapy (RT) and cancer treatment, patients still experience adverse effects. Proton therapy (PT) has emerged as a valuable RT modality that can improve treatment outcomes. Normal tissue injury is an important determinant of the outcome; therefore, for this review, we analyzed 2 databases: (1) clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov and (2) the literature on PT in PubMed, which shows a steady increase in the number of publications. Most studies in PT registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with results available are nonrandomized early phase studies with a relatively small number of patients enrolled. From the larger database of nonrandomized trials, we listed adverse events in specific organs/sites among patients with cancer who are treated with photons and protons to identify critical issues. The present data demonstrate dosimetric advantages of PT with favorable toxicity profiles and form the basis for comparative randomized prospective trials. A comparative analysis of 3 recently completed randomized trials for normal tissue toxicities suggests that for early stage non-small cell lung cancer, no meaningful comparison could be made between stereotactic body RT and stereotactic body PT due to low accrual (NCT01511081). In addition, for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, a comparison of intensity modulated RTwith passive scattering PT (now largely replaced by spot-scanned intensity modulated PT), PT did not provide any benefit in normal tissue toxicity or locoregional failure over photon therapy. Finally, for locally advanced esophageal cancer, proton beam therapy provided a lower total toxicity burden but did not improve progression-free survival and quality of life (NCT01512589). The purpose of this review is to inform the limitations of current trials looking at protons and photons, considering that advances in technology, physics, and biology are a continuum, and to advocate for future trials geared toward accurate precision RT that need to be viewed as an iterative process in a defined path toward delivering optimal radiation treatment. A foundational understanding of the radiobiologic differences between protons and photons in tumor and normal tissue responses is fundamental to, and necessary for, determining the suitability of a given type of biologically optimized RT to a patient or cohort.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: current standards and ongoing research

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allows for the non-invasive and precise delivery of ablative radiation dose. The use and availability of SBRT has increased rapidly over the past decades. SBRT has been proven to be a safe, effective and efficient treatment for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is presently considered the standard of care in the treatment of medically or functionally inoperable patients. Evidence from prospective randomized trials on the optimal treatment of patients deemed medically operable remains owing, as three trials comparing SBRT to surgery in this cohort were terminated prematurely due to poor accrual. Yet, SBRT in early stage NSCLC is associated with favorable toxicity profiles and excellent rates of local control, prompting discussion in regard of the treatment of medically operable patients, where the standard of care currently remains surgical resection. Although local control in early stage NSCLC after SBRT is high, distant failure remains an issue, prompting research interest to the combination of SBRT and systemic treatment. Evolving advances in SBRT technology further facilitate the safe treatment of patients with medically or anatomically challenging situations. In this review article, we discuss international guidelines and the current standard of care, ongoing clinical challenges and future directions from the clinical and technical point of view.

Proton beam radiotherapy for patients with early-stage and advanced lung cancer: a narrative review with contemporary clinical recommendations

Although lung cancer rates are decreasing nationally, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer related death. Despite advancements in treatment and technology, overall survival (OS) for lung cancer remains poor. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is an advanced radiation therapy (RT) modality for treatment of lung cancer with the potential to achieve dose escalation to tumor while sparing critical structures due to higher target conformality. In early and late-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), dosimetric studies demonstrated reduced doses to organs at risk (OARs) such as the lung, spinal cord, and heart, and clinical studies report limited toxicities with PBT, including hypofractionated regimens. In limited-stage SCLC, studies showed that regimens chemo RT including PBT were well tolerated, which may help optimize clinical outcomes. Improved toxicity profiles may be beneficial in post-operative radiotherapy, for which initial dosimetric and clinical data are encouraging. Sparing of OARs may also increase the proportion of patients able to complete reirradiation for recurrent disease. However, there are various challenges of using PBT including a higher financial burden on healthcare and limited data supporting its cost-effectiveness. Further studies are needed to identify subgroups that benefit from PBT based on prognostic factors, and to evaluate PBT combined with immunotherapy, in order to elucidate the benefit that PBT may offer future lung cancer patients.

Where are we with proton beam therapy for thoracic malignancies? Current status and future perspectives

Radiation therapy (RT) plays an important role in the curative treatment of a variety of thoracic malignancies. However, delivery of tumoricidal doses with conventional photon-based RT to thoracic tumors often presents unique challenges. Extraneous dose deposited along the entrance and exit paths of the photon beam increases the likelihood of significant acute and delayed toxicities in cardiac, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal structures. Furthermore, safe dose-escalation, delivery of concomitant systemic therapy, or reirradiation of a recurrent disease are frequently not feasible with photon RT. In contrast, protons have distinct physical properties that allow them to deposit a high irradiation dose in the target, while leaving a negligible exit dose in the adjacent organs at risk. Proton beam therapy (PBT), therefore, can reduce toxicities with similar antitumor effect or allow for dose escalation and enhanced antitumor effect with the same or even lower risk of adverse events, thus potentially improving the therapeutic ratio of the treatment. For thoracic malignancies, this favorable dose distribution can translate to decreases in treatment-related morbidities, provide more durable disease control, and potentially prolong survival. This review examines the evolving role of PBT in the treatment of thoracic malignancies and evaluates the data supporting its use.

Image-Guided Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2 Study

Purpose

Due to the excellent outcomes with image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the low treatment-related toxicities using proton therapy (PT), we investigated treatment outcomes and toxicities when delivering hypofractionated PT.

Materials and Methods

Between 2009 and 2018, 22 patients with T1 to T2 N0M0 NSCLC (45% T1, 55% T2) received image-guided hypofractionated PT. The median age at diagnosis was 72 years (range, 58-90). Patients underwent 4-dimensional computed tomography simulation following fiducial marker placement, and daily image guidance was performed. Nine patients (41%) were treated with 48 GyRBE in 4 fractions for peripheral lesions, and 13 patients (59%) were treated with 60 GyRBE in 10 fractions for central lesions. Patients were assessed for CTCAEv4 toxicities with computed tomography imaging for tumor assessment. The primary endpoint was grade 3 to 5 toxicity at 1 year.

Results

The median follow-up for all patients was 3.5 years (range, 0.2-8.8 years). The overall survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 81% and 49%, respectively. Cause-specific survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 100% and 75%, respectively. The 3-year local, regional, and distant control rates were 86%, 85%, and 95%, respectively. Four patients experienced in-field recurrences between 18 and 45 months after treatment. One patient (5%) developed a late grade 3 bronchial stricture requiring hospitalization and stent.

Conclusion

Image-guided hypofractionated PT for early-stage NSCLC provides promising local control and long-term survival with a low likelihood of toxicity. Regional nodal and distant relapses remain a problem.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for central and ultracentral node-negative lung tumors

Advancements in imaging and radiotherapy (RT) techniques have allowed for remarkably precise delivery of high radiation dose per treatment fraction to intrathoracic targets. As a non-invasive therapeutic modality (compared to surgery), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an attractive option for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancers and oligometastases, especially for older patients with significant comorbidities and pre-existing pulmonary dysfunction. However, the outcomes and side effect profile of SBRT are highly dependent on tumor location, especially if the tumor is located centrally (within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree (PBT)] or ultracentrally (touching or within 1 cm of the mediastinum, esophagus, and PBT). In this focused review, we will examine the contemporary practice and principles of using hypofractionated RT or SBRT for central and ultracentral thoracic tumors. We will identify future directions on how this practice may be incorporated into the increasingly complicated modern paradigm of lung cancer treatments which now include immunotherapy along with proton beam radiotherapy.

Image-guided hypofractionated double-scattering proton therapy in the management of centrally-located early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The treatment of centrally-located early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is challenging due to the proximity of critical normal structures to the tumor target. The purpose of this study was to report the results of our experience in treating centrally-located early-stage NSCLC with hypofractionated proton therapy (PT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2009 and 2018, 23 patients with T1-T2N0M0 NSCLC (T1, 46%; T2, 54%) were treated with image-guided hypofractionated double-scattering PT. The median age at the time of treatment was 74 years (range, 58-88). Patients underwent 4-dimensional computed tomography (CT) simulation following fiducial marker placement, and daily image guidance was performed. All patients were treated with 60 GyRBE in 10 fractions. Patients were assessed for CTCAEv4 toxicities weekly during treatment, and at regular follow-up intervals with CT imaging for tumor assessment. Overall survival, cause-specific survival, local control, regional control, and metastases-free survival were evaluated using cumulative incidence with competing risks.

RESULTS

Median follow-up for all patients was 3.2 years (range, 0.2-9.2 years). Overall survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 81% and 50% (95% CI, 27-79%), respectively. Cause-specific survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 81% and 71% (95% CI, 46-92%). The 3-year local, regional, and distant control rates were 90%, 81%, and 87%, respectively. Three patients (13%) experienced local recurrences as their first recurrence, at a median time of 28 months from completion of radiation (range, 18-61 months). Two patients (9%) experienced late grade 3 toxicities, including 1 patient who developed a bronchial stricture that required stent placement.

CONCLUSION

Image-guided hypofractionated PT for centrally-located early-stage NSCLC provides excellent local control with low rates of grade ≥3 toxicities. For tumors in sensitive locations, PT may provide safer treatment than photon-based treatments due to its dosimetric advantages.

Current radiotherapy techniques in NSCLC: challenges and potential solutions

Introduction: Radiotherapy is an important therapeutic strategy in the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In recent decades, technological implementations and the introduction of image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) have significantly increased the accuracy and tolerability of radiation therapy.Area covered: In this review, we provide an overview of technological opportunities and future prospects in NSCLC management.Expert opinion: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is now considered the standard approach in patients ineligible for surgery, while in operable cases, it is still under debate. Additionally, in combination with systemic treatment, SBRT is an innovative option for managing oligometastatic patients and features encouraging initial results in clinical outcomes. To date, in inoperable locally advanced NSCLC, the radical dose prescription has not changed (60 Gy in 30 fractions), despite the median overall survival progressively increasing. These results arise from technological improvements in precisely hitting target treatment volumes and organ at risk sparing, which are associated with better treatment qualities. Finally, for the management of NSCLC, proton and carbon ion therapies and the recent development of MR-Linac are new, intriguing technological approaches under investigation.

Radiation Therapy for Thoracic Malignancies

Radiotherapy is the most commonly used nonsurgical modality in treatment of lung cancers, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in particular. Radiation therapy has been increasingly used as definitive radical treatment, either alone or in combination with concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced disease. More recently with the advent of novel radiation techniques and modalities such as stereotactic radiotherapy and proton therapy, radiotherapy can now be used as sole radical treatment of small solitary tumors. This article reviews the current indications and future directions of radiotherapy in lung cancer management.

New frontiers in proton therapy: applications in cancers

Proton therapy offers dominant advantages over photon therapy due to the unique depth-dose characteristics of proton, which can cause a dramatic reduction in normal tissue doses both distal and proximal to the tumor target volume. In turn, this feature may allow dose escalation to the tumor target volume while sparing the tumor-neighboring susceptible organs at risk, which has the potential to reduce treatment toxicity and improve local control rate, quality of life and survival. Some dosimetric studies in various cancers have demonstrated the advantages over photon therapy in dose distributions. Further, it has been observed that proton therapy confers to substantial clinical advantage over photon therapy in head and neck, breast, hepatocellular, and non-small cell lung cancers. As such, proton therapy is regarded as the standard modality of radiotherapy in many pediatric cancers from the technical point of view. However, due to the limited clinical evidence, there have been concerns about the high cost of proton therapy from an economic point of view. Considering the treatment expenses for late radiation-induced toxicities, cost-effective analysis in many studies have shown that proton therapy is the most cost-effective option for brain, head and neck and selected breast cancers. Additional studies are warranted to better unveil the cost-effective values of proton therapy and to develop newer ways for better protection of normal tissues. This review aims at reviewing the recent studies on proton therapy to explore its benefits and cost-effectiveness in cancers. We strongly believe that proton therapy will be a common radiotherapy modality for most types of solid cancers in the future.

Proton Beam Therapy for Histologically or Clinically Diagnosed Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): The First Nationwide Retrospective Study in Japan

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy (PBT) for the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Six hundred sixty-nine patients with 682 tumors histologically or clinically diagnosed stage I NSCLC according to the seventh edition of Union for International Cancer Control who received passive-scattering PBT from April 2004 and December 2013 in Japan were retrospectively reviewed to analyze survival, local control, and toxicities.

RESULTS

Of 669 patients, 486 (72.6%) were men, with a median age of 76 years (range, 42-94 years). NSCLC was histologically confirmed in 440 patients (65.7%). Clinical T stages included T1a (n = 265; 38.9%), T1b (n = 216; 31.7%), and T2a (n = 201; 29.4%). The total irradiation doses of PBT ranged from 74.4 to 131.3 biological effective dose GyE (median, 109.6 biological effective dose GyE). The median follow-up period was 38.2 months (range, 0.6-154.5 months) for all patients. The 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates for all patients were 79.5% and 64.1%, respectively. For patients with stage IA tumors, the 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 82.8% and 70.6%, respectively, and the corresponding rates for patients with stage IB tumors were 70.8% and 47.3%, respectively. The 3-year local progression-free rates for all, stage IA, and stage IB patients were 89.8%, 93.5%, and 79.4%, respectively. The incidence of grade 2, 3, 4, and 5 pneumonitis was 9.8%, 1.0%, 0%, and 0.7%, respectively. The incidence of grade ≥3 dermatitis was 0.4%. No grade 4 or severe adverse events, other than pneumonitis, were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

PBT appears to yield acceptable survival rates, with a low rate of toxicities.

Proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: the road ahead

Proton therapy is an evolving radiotherapy modality with indication for numerous cancer types. With the benefits of reducing dose and sparing normal tissue, protons offer a clear physical and dosimetric advantage over photon radiotherapy for many patients. However, its impact on one type of disease, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is still not fully understood. Our review aims to highlight the data for using proton therapy in NSCLC, with a focus on the clinical data-or lack thereof-supporting proton treatment for early and advanced stage disease. In evaluating these data, we consider how future directions and advances in proton technology give rise for hope in defining a role for protons in improving NSCLC outcomes. We close with considerations for next steps and the challenges ahead in using proton therapy for this unique patient population.

Insurance Approval for Proton Beam Therapy and its Impact on Delays in Treatment

PURPOSE

Prior authorization (PA) has been widely implemented for proton beam therapy (PBT). We sought to determine the association between PA determination and patient characteristics, practice guidelines, and potential treatment delays.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A single-institution retrospective analysis was performed of all patients considered for PBT between 2015 and 2018 at a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Differences in treatment start times and denial rates over time were compared, and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of initial denial.

RESULTS

A total of 444 patients were considered for PBT, including 396 adult and 48 pediatric patients. The American Society for Radiation Oncology model policy supported PBT coverage for 77% of the cohort. Of adult patients requiring PA, 64% were initially denied and 32% remained denied after appeal. In patients considered for reirradiation or randomized phase 3 trial enrollment, initial denial rates were 57% and 64%, respectively. Insurance coverage was not related to diagnosis, reirradiation, trial enrollment, or the American Society for Radiation Oncology model policy guidelines, but it was related to insurance category on multivariable analysis (P < .001). Over a 3-year timespan, initial denial rates increased from 55% to 74% (P = .034). PA delayed treatment start by an average of 3 weeks (and up to 4 months) for those requiring appeal (P < .001) and resulted in 19% of denied patients abandoning radiation treatment altogether. Of pediatric patients, 9% were initially denied, all of whom were approved after appeal, and PA requirement did not delay treatment start (P = .47).

CONCLUSIONS

PA requirements in adults represent a significant burden in initiating PBT and cause significant delays in patient care. Insurance approval is arbitrary and has become more restrictive over time, discordant with national clinical practice guidelines. Payors and providers should seek to streamline coverage policies in alignment with established guidelines to ensure appropriate and timely patient care.

Multiple primary lung cancer: a rising challenge

With the use of high-resolution chest imaging system and lung cancer screening program, patients with multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) are becoming a growing population in clinical practice worldwide. The diagnostic criteria for MPLCs has been established and modified by three major lung cancer research institutes. However, due to the fact that the differential diagnosis between MPLCs and a recurrence, metastatic, or satellite lesion arising from the original lesion remains ambiguous and confusing, there is still insufficient evidence to support a uniform guideline. Newly developed molecular and genomic methods have the potential to better define the relationship among multiple lesions and bring the possibility of targeted therapy. Surgical resection remains the first choice for the treatment of MPLCs and detailed strategy should be carefully planned taking characteristics of the tumor and status of patients into consideration. For those who are intolerant to surgery, a new technology called stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is now an optional therapeutic strategy. Furthermore, multiple GGOs are unique MPLCs that need special attentions in the clinical practice.

Final report of survival and late toxicities in the Phase I study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for peripheral T2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG0702)

Purpose

A dose escalation study to determine the recommended dose with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for peripheral T2N0M0 non-small cell carcinomas (JCOG0702) was conducted. The purpose of this paper is to report the survival and the late toxicities of JCOG0702.

Materials and methods

The continual reassessment method was used to determine the dose level that patients should be assigned to and to estimate the maximum tolerated dose. The starting dose was 40 Gy in four fractions at D₉₅ of PTV.

Results

Twenty-eight patients were enrolled. Ten patients were treated with 40 Gy at D₉₅ of PTV, four patients with 45 Gy, eight patients with 50 Gy, one patient with 55 Gy and five patients with 60 Gy. Ten patients were alive at the last follow-up. Overall survival (OS) for all patients was 67.9% (95% CI 47.3–81.8%) at 3 years and 40.8% (95% CI 22.4–58.5%) at 5 years. No Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed after 181 days from the beginning of the SBRT. Compared to the toxicities up to 180 days, chest wall related toxicities were more frequent after 181 days.

Conclusions

The 5-year OS of 40.8% indicates the possibility that SBRT for peripheral T2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer is superior to conventional radiotherapy. The effect of the SBRT dose escalation on OS is unclear and further studies are warranted.

Proton beam therapy for cancer in the era of precision medicine

Precision radiotherapy, which accurately delivers the dose on a tumor and confers little or no irradiation to the surrounding normal tissue and organs, results in maximum tumor control and decreases the toxicity to the utmost extent. Proton beam therapy (PBT) provides superior dose distributions and has a dosimetric advantage over photon beam therapy. Initially, the clinical practice and study of proton beam therapy focused on ocular tumor, skull base, paraspinal tumors (chondrosarcoma and chordoma), and unresectable sarcomas, which responded poorly when treated with photon radiotherapy. Then, it is widely regarded as an ideal mode for reirradiation and pediatrics due to reducing unwanted side effects by lessening the dose to normal tissue. During the past decade, the application of PBT has been rapidly increasing worldwide and gradually expanding for the treatment of various malignancies. However, to date, the role of PBT in clinical settings is still controversial, and there are considerable challenges in its application. We systematically review the latest advances of PBT and the challenges for patient treatment in the era of precision medicine.