A Dose of Reality: How 20 Years of Incomplete Physics and Dosimetry Reporting in Radiobiology Studies May Have Contributed to the Reproducibility Crisis

Characterization of commercial detectors for absolute proton UHDR dosimetry on a compact clinical proton synchrocyclotron

BACKGROUND

Modern compact proton synchrocyclotrons can achieve ultra-high dose rates ( ≥ $ \ge $ 40 Gy/s) to support ultra-high-dose-rate (UHDR) preclinical experiments utilizing pencil beam scanning (PBS) protons. Unique to synchrocyclotrons is a pulsed proton time structure as compared to the quasi-continuous nature of other proton accelerators like isochronous cyclotrons. Thus, high instantaneous proton currents in the order of several µA must be generated to achieve UHDRs. This will lead to high doses-per-pulse (DPP), which may cause significant charge recombination for ionization chambers, which must be characterized for accurate UHDR dosimetry programs.

PURPOSE

In this work, we investigate the suitability of various commercial radiation detectors for accurate proton UHDR dosimetry using PBS proton beams from a compact proton synchrocyclotron (IBA ProteusONE). This is achieved by cross-calibrating them with conventional dose rates, measuring UHDR recombination (Pion) and polarity correction factors (Ppol) for ionization chambers, and determining the absorbed proton UHDR dose delivered for all detectors.

METHODS

An IBA ProteusONE synchrocyclotron was initially tuned to achieve UHDRs with 228 MeV protons at 0° gantry angle. Various detectors, including Razor Chamber, Razor Nano Chamber, Razor Diode, and microDiamond, were cross-calibrated against a PPC05 plane-parallel ionization chamber (PPIC) that had an ADCL calibration coefficient of 59.23 cGy/nC. Then, all ionization chambers were exposed to UHDR protons with the Ppol and Pion subsequently calculated. Pion was calculated using two methods: TRS-398 methods and Niatel's model. Finally, the absolute UHDR proton doses delivered were determined for all detectors and cross-compared.

RESULTS

Faraday cup measurements were performed for a single spot proton UHDR beam, and the nozzle current at the isocenter was determined to be 129.5 nA during UHDR irradiations at 98.61% of the maximum theoretical dose rate. Repeated Faraday cup measurements of the UHDR beam yielded a percentage standard deviation of 0.8%, which was higher than 0.120% when similar repeated measurements were performed with conventional proton beams. Ppol was found to be relatively dose-rate independent for all ionization chambers investigated. Pion was found to be the lowest for the PPC05 ionization chamber (1.0097) compared to corresponding values of 1.0214 and 1.0294 for the Razor and Razor Nano detectors, respectively, for UHDRs. Pion values calculated using Niatel's model closely matched values from TRS-398 if the VH/VL ratio were kept at 2.5 for the PPC05 and Razor detectors and 2.0 for the Razor Nano detector. Absolute proton UHDR doses determined using cross-calibration factors were generally within ± 1% of PPC05 measurements. However, Razor Diode was found to over-respond by up to 3.79% within UHDR proton beams, rendering them unsuitable for proton UHDR dosimetry.

CONCLUSION

In this work, we comprehensively evaluated the suitability of various commercial detectors for absolute dosimetry with a pulsed UHDR beam structure from a proton synchrocyclotron. PPC05 had the lowest ionic recombination correction compared to Razor and Razor Nano ion chambers. Other than the diode detector, all other investigated detectors (PPC05, Razor, Razor Nano, microDiamond) were within ± 1% of one another and can be used for accurate absolute proton UHDR dosimetry.

Establishing a low-dose x-ray irradiation protocol for experimental acute graft-versus-host disease

The investigation of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation heavily relies on the use of experimental animal models and total body irradiation (TBI) as a conditioning regimen. However, 137Cs is gradually being replaced as the main source of radiation due to safety concerns, and the transfer of established irradiation protocols to x-ray irradiators has proven difficult. Here, we describe the establishment of an x-ray-based irradiation protocol in an experimental mouse model for acute GvHD (C57BL6 → BALB/c). Our data show that commonly reported dosages of 6-9 Gy did not result in a viable model. Instead, irradiation with 5 Gy led to the development of clinical symptoms of GvHD in mice after transplantation with allogeneic bone marrow and T cells. Mice with GvHD displayed altered hemograms and increased serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines compared with mice without GvHD, which was accompanied by sequestration of donor lymphocytes within organs. Donor chimerism and hemogram analyses also indicated sufficient myeloablation and hematopoietic reconstitution. Overall, we show that low-dose x-ray TBI effectively promotes acute GvHD in a mismatched mouse model. We also propose that the transfer of previously established gamma-ray TBI protocols should be carefully evaluated according to individual circumstances.

Redefining FLASH Radiation Therapy: The Impact of Mean Dose Rate and Dose Per Pulse in the Gastrointestinal Tract

PURPOSE

The understanding of how varying radiation beam parameter settings affect the induction and magnitude of the FLASH effect remains limited. We sought to systematically evaluate how the magnitude of radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity depends on the interplay between mean dose rate (MDR) and dose per pulse (DPP).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

C57BL/6J mice received total abdominal irradiation (TAI, 11-14 Gy single fraction) through either conventional (CONV) irradiation (low-DPP and low MDR, CONV) or through various combinations of DPP and MDR up to ultra-high-dose-rate beam conditions. DPPs ranging from 1 to 6 Gy were evaluated, while the total dose and MDR (>100 Gy/s) were kept constant; the effects of MDR were evaluated for the range of 0.3 to 1440 Gy/s, while the total dose and DPP were kept constant. Radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity was quantified in nontumor-bearing mice through the regenerating crypt assay and survival assessment. Tumor response was evaluated through tumor growth delay.

RESULTS

Within each tested total dose using a constant MDR (>100 Gy/s), increasing DPP led to an increase in sparing (an increase in the number of regenerating crypts), with a more prominent effect seen at 12- and 14-Gy TAI. Interestingly, at DPPs of >4 Gy, a similar level of crypt sparing was demonstrated irrespective of the MDR used (from 0.3 to 1440 Gy/s). At a fixed high-DPP of 4.7 Gy, survival was equivalently improved relative to CONV irrespective of MDR. However, at a lower DPP of 0.93 Gy, an MDR of 104 Gy/s produced a greater survival effect compared with 0.3 Gy/s. We also confirmed that high-DPP, regardless of MDR, produced the same magnitude of tumor growth delay relative to CONV using a clinically relevant melanoma mouse model.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the strong influence that the beam parameter settings have on the magnitude of the FLASH effect. Both high-DPP and ultra-high-dose-rate appeared independently sufficient to produce FLASH sparing of gastrointestinal toxicity while isoeffective tumor response was maintained across all conditions.

Protocol compliance in a multicentric phase III trial investigating scheduled adaptive radiotherapy and dose painting in head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To report on quality assurance (QA) and protocol adherence (PA) in a multicentre phase III trial for head and neck cancer, evaluate patterns of protocol deviations and investigate the effect of PA on study outcomes.

METHODS

All 221 patients from the ARTFORCE trial (NCT01504815) were included in this study. Pre- and per-treatment QA measures included protocol guidelines, a dummy run, early case reviews and trial meetings. FDG-PET-guided dose painting and scheduled adaptive radiotherapy were reviewed in patients in the experimental arm (eRT). Patient and disease characteristics, as well as institutes' accrual rate and timing were examined for correlation with PA. Cox regression was used to determine the impact of PA on outcome.

RESULTS

The dummy run was completed in all nine institutes and early case reviews were completed in five out of nine institutes that contributed 190 out of 221 patients. Among all patients randomized to eRT, 64 % had at least one deviation of the experimental trial components. Protocol deviations were significantly correlated with the institute patients were treated at (Cramer'sV 0.34-0.48). Despite early identification of institute-specific deviations in QA, these continued during the trial. No significant associations were seen between deviations and accrual timing or rate (P ≥ 0.26). Within eRT, no significant relation was observed between experimental PA and locoregional control (LRC), the primary endpoint of the trial (P≥.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite QA, protocol deviations persisted during the trial, which were mostly institute-specific. However, deviations of the experimental treatment strategy did not significantly impact LRC and therefore the trial conclusion.

Robust Automated Mouse Micro-CT Segmentation Using Swin UNEt TRansformers

Image-guided mouse irradiation is essential to understand interventions involving radiation prior to human studies. Our objective is to employ Swin UNEt TRansformers (Swin UNETR) to segment native micro-CT and contrast-enhanced micro-CT scans and benchmark the results against 3D no-new-Net (nnU-Net). Swin UNETR reformulates mouse organ segmentation as a sequence-to-sequence prediction task using a hierarchical Swin Transformer encoder to extract features at five resolution levels, and it connects to a Fully Convolutional Neural Network (FCNN)-based decoder via skip connections. The models were trained and evaluated on open datasets, with data separation based on individual mice. Further evaluation on an external mouse dataset acquired on a different micro-CT with lower kVp and higher imaging noise was also employed to assess model robustness and generalizability. The results indicate that Swin UNETR consistently outperforms nnU-Net and AIMOS in terms of the average dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the Hausdorff distance (HD95p), except in two mice for intestine contouring. This superior performance is especially evident in the external dataset, confirming the model's robustness to variations in imaging conditions, including noise and quality, and thereby positioning Swin UNETR as a highly generalizable and efficient tool for automated contouring in pre-clinical workflows.

A multi-institutional study to investigate the sparing effect after whole brain electron FLASH in mice: Reproducibility and temporal evolution of functional, electrophysiological, and neurogenic endpoints

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Ultra-high dose-rate radiotherapy (FLASH) has been shown to mitigate normal tissue toxicities associated with conventional dose rate radiotherapy (CONV) without compromising tumor killing in preclinical models. A prominent challenge in preclinical radiation research, including FLASH, is validating both the physical dosimetry and the biological effects across multiple institutions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We previously demonstrated dosimetric reproducibility of two different electron FLASH devices at separate institutions using standardized phantoms and dosimeters. In this study, tumor-free adult female mice were given 10 Gy whole brain FLASH and CONV irradiation at both institutions and evaluated for the reproducibility and temporal evolution of multiple neurobiological endpoints.

RESULTS

FLASH sparing of behavioral performance on novel object recognition (4 months post-irradiation) and of electrophysiologic long-term potentiation (LTP, 5 months post-irradiation) was reproduced between institutions. Differences between FLASH and CONV on the endpoints of hippocampal neurogenesis (Sox2, doublecortin), neuroinflammation (microglial activation), and electrophysiology (LTP) were not observed at early times (48 h to 2 weeks), but recovery of immature neurons by 3 weeks was greater with FLASH.

CONCLUSION

In summary, we demonstrated reproducible FLASH sparing effects on the brain between two different beams at two different institutions with validated dosimetry. FLASH sparing effects on the endpoints evaluated manifested at later but not the earliest time points.

The undeclared use of third-party service providers in academic publishing is unethical: an epistemic reflection and scoping review

There is a substantial body of scientific literature on the use of third-party services (TPS) by academics to assist as "publication consultants" in scholarly publishing. TPS provide a wide range of scholarly services to research teams that lack the equipment, skills, motivation, or time to produce a paper without external assistance. While services such as language editing, statistical support, or graphic design are common and often legitimate, some TPS also provide illegitimate services and send unsolicited e-mails (spam) to academics offering these services. Such illegitimate types of TPS have the potential to threaten the integrity of the peer-reviewed scientific literature. In extreme cases, for-profit agencies known as "paper mills" even offer fake scientific publications or authorship slots for sale. The use of such illegitimate services as well as the failure to acknowledge their use is an ethical violation in academic publishing, while the failure to declare support for a TPS can be considered a form of contract fraud. We discuss some literature on TPS, highlight services currently offered by ten of the largest commercial publishers and expect authors to be transparent about the use of these services in their publications. From an ethical/moral (i.e., non-commercial) point of view, it is the responsibility of editors, journals, and publishers, and it should be in their best interest to ensure that illegitimate TPS are identified and prohibited, while publisher-employed TPS should be properly disclosed in their publications.

Inter-center comparison of proton range verification prototypes with an anthropomorphic head phantom. Phys Med Biol 2024;69:225010. [PMID: 39526382 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad8856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Objective. To compare in reproducible and equalized conditions the performance of two independent proton range verification systems based on prompt gamma-ray detectors from two different proton therapy centers.Approach. An anthropomorphic head phantom with calibrated stopping power, serving as ground truth, was irradiated with comparable treatment plans, spot positions and energies in both facilities. Clinical beam current, tumor contour and dose were used. The absolute range measurement was compared to the expected value according to the ground truth. The statistical precision was assessed by repeating each measurement ten times. Sensitivity to relative range shifts was evaluated by introducing 2 mm and 5 mm plastic slabs on half of the field.Main results. The resulting absolute range accuracy was within 2.4 mm in all cases. Relative range shifts were detected with deviations lower than 14%.Significance. The performance of both systems was deemed worthy of clinical application for the detection of range deviations. This study represents the first comparison of independent prompt gamma-ray-based proton range verification systems under equalized conditions with realistic treatment fields and beam currents.

Recording and reporting of ultra-high dose rate "FLASH" delivery for preclinical and clinical settings

Treatments at ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) have the potential to improve the therapeutic index of radiation therapy (RT) by sparing normal tissues compared to conventional dose rate irradiations. Insufficient and inconsistent reporting in physics and dosimetry of preclinical and translational studies may have contributed to a reproducibility crisis of radiobiological data in the field. Consequently, the development of a common terminology, as well as common recording, reporting, dosimetry, and metrology standards is required. In the context of UHDR irradiations, the temporal dose delivery parameters are of importance, and under-reporting of these parameters is also a concern.This work proposes a standardization of terminology, recording, and reporting to enhance comparability of both preclinical and clinical UHDR studies and and to allow retrospective analyses to aid the understanding of the conditions which give rise to the FLASH effect.

Relative biological effectiveness of clinically relevant photon energies for the survival of human colorectal, cervical, and prostate cancer cell lines

Objective.Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) differs between radiation qualities. However, an RBE of 1.0 has been established for photons regardless of the wide range of photon energies used clinically, the lack of reproducibility in radiobiological studies, and outdated reference energies used in the experimental literature. Moreover, due to intrinsic radiosensitivity, different cancer types have different responses to radiation. This study aimed to characterize the RBE of clinically relevant high and low photon energiesin vitrofor three human cancer cell lines: HCT116 (colon), HeLa (cervix), and PC3 (prostate).Approach.Experiments were conducted following dosimetry protocols provided by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Cells were irradiated with 6 MV x-rays, an192Ir brachytherapy source, 225 kVp and 50 kVp x-rays. Cell survival post-irradiation was assessed using the clonogenic assay. Survival fractions were fitted using the linear quadratic model, and survival curves were generated for RBE calculations.Main results.Cell killing was more efficient with decreasing photon energy. Using 225 kVp x-rays as the reference, the HCT116 RBESF0.1for 6 MV x-rays,192Ir, and 50 kVp x-rays were 0.89 ± 0.03, 0.95 ± 0.03, and 1.24 ± 0.04; the HeLa RBESF0.1were 0.95 ± 0.04, 0.97 ± 0.05, and 1.09 ± 0.03, and the PC3 RBESF0.1were 0.84 ± 0.01, 0.84 ± 0.01, and 1.13 ± 0.02, respectively. HeLa and PC3 cells had varying radiosensitivity when irradiated with 225 and 50 kVp x-rays.Significance.This difference supports the notion that RBE may not be 1.0 for all photons through experimental investigations that employed precise dosimetry. It highlights that different cancer types may not have identical responses to the same irradiation quality. Additionally, the RBE of clinically relevant photons was updated to the reference energy of 225 kVp x-rays.

Modelling radiobiology

Radiotherapy has played an essential role in cancer treatment for over a century, and remains one of the best-studied methods of cancer treatment. Because of its close links with the physical sciences, it has been the subject of extensive quantitative mathematical modelling, but a complete understanding of the mechanisms of radiotherapy has remained elusive. In part this is because of the complexity and range of scales involved in radiotherapy-from physical radiation interactions occurring over nanometres to evolution of patient responses over months and years. This review presents the current status and ongoing research in modelling radiotherapy responses across these scales, including basic physical mechanisms of DNA damage, the immediate biological responses this triggers, and genetic- and patient-level determinants of response. Finally, some of the major challenges in this field and potential avenues for future improvements are also discussed.

Multi-Institutional Audit of FLASH and Conventional Dosimetry With a 3D Printed Anatomically Realistic Mouse Phantom

PURPOSE

We conducted a multi-institutional dosimetric audit between FLASH and conventional dose rate (CONV) electron irradiations by using an anatomically realistic 3-dimensional (3D) printed mouse phantom.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A computed tomography (CT) scan of a live mouse was used to create a 3D model of bony anatomy, lungs, and soft tissue. A dual-nozzle 3D printer was used to print the mouse phantom using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (∼1.02 g/cm3) and polylactic acid (∼1.24 g/cm3) simultaneously to simulate soft tissue and bone densities, respectively. The lungs were printed separately using lightweight polylactic acid (∼0.64 g/cm3). Hounsfield units (HU), densities, and print-to-print stability of the phantoms were assessed. Three institutions were each provided a phantom and each institution performed 2 replicates of irradiations at selected anatomic regions. The average dose difference between FLASH and CONV dose distributions and deviation from the prescribed dose were measured with radiochromic film.

RESULTS

Compared with the reference CT scan, CT scans of the phantom demonstrated mass density differences of 0.10 g/cm3 for bone, 0.12 g/cm3 for lung, and 0.03 g/cm3 for soft tissue regions. Differences in HU between phantoms were <10 HU for soft tissue and bone, with lung showing the most variation (54 HU), but with minimal effect on dose distribution (<0.5%). Mean differences between FLASH and CONV decreased from the first to the second replicate (4.3%-1.2%), and differences from the prescribed dose decreased for both CONV (3.6%-2.5%) and FLASH (6.4%-2.7%). Total dose accuracy suggests consistent pulse dose and pulse number, although these were not specifically assessed. Positioning variability was observed, likely due to the absence of robust positioning aids or image guidance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study marks the first dosimetric audit for FLASH using a nonhomogeneous phantom, challenging conventional calibration practices reliant on homogeneous phantoms. The comparison protocol offers a framework for credentialing multi-institutional studies in FLASH preclinical research to enhance reproducibility of biologic findings.

Metrology for advanced radiotherapy using particle beams with ultra-high dose rates

Dosimetry of ultra-high dose rate beams is one of the critical components which is required for safe implementation of FLASH radiotherapy (RT) into clinical practice. In the past years several national and international programmes have emerged with the aim to address some of the needs that are required for translation of this modality to clinics. These involve the establishment of dosimetry standards as well as the validation of protocols and dosimetry procedures. This review provides an overview of recent developments in the field of dosimetry for FLASH RT, with particular focus on primary and secondary standard instruments, and provides a brief outlook on the future work which is required to enable clinical implementation of FLASH RT.

Navigating the Critical Translational Questions for Implementing FLASH in the Clinic

The "FLASH effect" is an increased therapeutic index, that is, reduced normal tissue toxicity for a given degree of anti-cancer efficacy, produced by ultra-rapid irradiation delivered on time scales orders of magnitude shorter than currently conventional in the clinic for the same doses. This phenomenon has been observed in numerous preclinical in vivo tumor and normal tissue models. While the underlying biological mechanism(s) remain to be elucidated, a path to clinical implementation of FLASH can be paved by addressing several critical translational questions. Technological questions pertinent to each beam type (eg, electron, proton, photon) also dictate the logical progression of experimentation required to move forward in safe and decisive clinical trials. Here we review the available preclinical data pertaining to these questions and how they may inform strategies for FLASH cancer therapy clinical trials.

Commissioning and Assessment of Radiation Field and Dose Inhomogeneity for a Dual X-ray Tube Cabinet Irradiator: To Ensure Accurate Dosimetry in Radiation Biology Experiments

Purpose

Standardization of x-ray cabinet irradiator dose, geometry, and calibration reporting is an ongoing process. Multi-tube designs have been introduced into the preclinical market and give a theoretical benefit but have not been widely assessed for use in preclinical irradiation conditions. The aim of this study was to report our experience commissioning a dual x-ray source cabinet irradiator (CIXD, Xstrahl Limited, United Kingdom) and assess the dose distribution for various experimental conditions.

Methods and Materials

Half-value layer (HVL) measurement, profile measurements, and output calibration were performed using a calibrated ion chamber. Constancy measurements were performed twice daily over 2 weeks to assess output fluctuations. Film measurements were completed using solid water to assess percent depth dose and homogeneity within the field and within variable thicknesses of solid water and phosphate-buffered saline solution. Film measurements were repeated for various arrangements of petri dishes filled with phosphate-buffered saline or water and in a 3D-printed mouse phantom.

Results

The x-ray tubes had a measured in-air output of 1.27 Gy/min. The HVL was 1.7 mm Cu. The upper and lower tubes both exhibited the heel effect, but when operated simultaneously, the effect was reduced. Ion chamber measurements revealed a 15% dose inhomogeneity within the tray area (18 × 18 cm2). Film measurements in the petri dishes indicated minor nonuniformities in the arrangements of the experimental apparatus. Measurements from the mouse phantom with film agreed with ion chamber measurements for various phantom placements and orientations.

Conclusions

X-ray cell culture and animal irradiation with dual tube cabinet irradiation is efficient and robust when using established dosimetric tools to confirm output and homogeneity. The conditions assumed for calibrations are often not maintained during experiments. We have confirmed that inhomogeneities are present for single-tube use; however, they are reduced with simultaneous tube use. Additional dosimetric monitoring should be performed for each unique irradiation setup.

Grid/lattice therapy: consideration of small field dosimetry

Small-field dosimetry used in special procedures such as gamma knife, Cyberknife, Tomotherapy, IMRT, and VMAT has been in evolution after several radiation incidences with very significant (70%) errors due to poor understanding of the dosimetry. IAEA-TRS-483 and AAPM-TG-155 have provided comprehensive information on small-fields dosimetry in terms of code of practice and relative dosimetry. Data for various detectors and conditions have been elaborated. It turns out that with a suitable detectors dose measurement accuracy can be reasonably (±3%) achieved for 6 MV beams for fields >1×1 cm2. For grid therapy, even though the treatment is performed with small fields created by either customized blocks, multileaf collimator (MLC), or specialized devices, it is multiple small fields that creates combined treatment. Hence understanding the dosimetry in collection of holes of small field is a separate challenge that needs to be addressed. It is more critical to understand the scattering conditions from multiple holes that form the treatment grid fields. Scattering changes the beam energy (softer) and hence dosimetry protocol needs to be properly examined for having suitable dosimetric parameters. In lieu of beam parameter unavailability in physical grid devices, MLC-based forward and inverse planning is an alternative path for bulky tumours. Selection of detectors in small field measurement is critical and it is more critical in mixed beams created by scattering condition. Ramification of small field concept used in grid therapy along with major consideration of scattering condition is explored. Even though this review article is focussed mainly for dosimetry for low-energy megavoltage photon beam (6 MV) but similar procedures could be adopted for high energy beams. To eliminate small field issues, lattice therapy with the help of MLC is a preferrable choice.

Radiation-induced gastrointestinal and cutaneous injuries: understanding models, pathologies, assessments, and clinically accepted practices

PURPOSE

A U. S. and European joint effort fostering the development of medical countermeasures (MCMs) operable in case of radiological or nuclear emergencies.

METHODS

Based on the joint engagement between the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the French Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), a Statement of Intent to Collaborate was signed in 2014 and a series of working group meeting were established. In December 2022, the NIAID and IRSN hosted a five-day, U.S./European meeting titled 'Radiation-Induced Cutaneous and Gastrointestinal Injuries: Advances in Understanding Pathologies, Assessment, and Clinically Accepted Practices' in Paris, France. The goals of the meeting were to bring together U.S. and European investigators to explore new research avenues for the medical management of skin and gastrointestinal injuries, including specific diagnostics for each organ system, animal models, and promising medical countermeasures (MCMs) to mitigate radiation damage. There was also an emphasis on exploring additional areas of medicine and response to understand best practices from other emergency scenarios, which could be leveraged to improve radiation preparedness, and the importance of accurate dosimetry in preclinical work.

RESULTS

Subsequent to the workshop, seven collaborative projects, funded by both organizations, were established on topics ranging from MCMs and predictive biomarkers, and using physical methods to assess cutaneous radiation injuries, to mechanistic studies to understand radiation-induced damage in multiple organ systems. The importance of accurate dosimetry in preclinical works was highlighted and two recently published U.S./European commentaries that focus on the need for dosimetry standardization in the reported literature had their origins in this meeting. This commentary summarizes the workshop and open discussions among academic investigators, industry researchers, and U.S. and IRSN program representatives.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the substantive progress made due to these interactions, both groups plan to expand out these meetings by incorporating high-level investigators from across the globe, while endeavoring to maintain the informal setting that was conducive to in-depth scientific discussion and enhanced the state of the science in radiation research.

Minimum reporting standards about dosimetry of radiation sources used in radiation research studies

The necessity of precise dosimetry and its documentation in research is less obvious than in medicine and in radiological protection. However, in radiation research, results can only be validated if experiments were carried out with sufficient precision and described with sufficient details, especially information regarding dosimetry. In order to ensure this, an initiative was launched to establish reproducible dosimetry reporting parameters in published studies. Minimum standards for reporting radiation dosimetry information were developed and published in parallel in the International Journal of Radiation Biology and Radiation Research. As editors of Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, we support this initiative and reproduce the agreed minimum irradiation parameters that should be reported in publications on radiation biology submitted to our journal.

Redefining FLASH RT: the impact of mean dose rate and dose per pulse in the gastrointestinal tract

Background

The understanding of how varying radiation beam parameter settings affect the induction and magnitude of the FLASH effect remains limited.

Purpose

We sought to evaluate how the magnitude of radiation-induced gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (RIGIT) depends on the interplay between mean dose rate (MDR) and dose per pulse (DPP).

Methods

C57BL/6J mice were subjected to total abdominal irradiation (11-14 Gy single fraction) under conventional irradiation (low DPP and low MDR, CONV) and various combinations of DPP and MDR up to ultra-high-dose-rate (UHDR) beam conditions. The effects of DPP were evaluated for DPPs of 1-6 Gy while the total dose and MDR were kept constant; the effects of MDR were evaluated for the range 0.3- 1440 Gy/s while the total dose and DPP were kept constant. RIGIT was quantified in non-tumor-bearing mice through the regenerating crypt assay and survival assessment. Tumor response was evaluated through tumor growth delay.

Results

Within each tested total dose using a constant MDR (>100 Gy/s), increasing DPP led to better sparing of regenerating crypts, with a more prominent effect seen at 12 and 14 Gy TAI. However, at fixed DPPs >4 Gy, similar sparing of crypts was demonstrated irrespective of MDR (from 0.3 to 1440 Gy/s). At a fixed high DPP of 4.7 Gy, survival was equivalently improved relative to CONV for all MDRs from 0.3 Gy/s to 104 Gy/s, but at a lower DPP of 0.93 Gy, increasing MDR produced a greater survival effect. We also confirmed that high DPP, regardless of MDR, produced the same magnitude of tumor growth delay relative to CONV using a clinically relevant melanoma mouse model.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the strong influence that the beam parameter settings have on the magnitude of the FLASH effect. Both high DPP and UHDR appeared independently sufficient to produce FLASH sparing of GI toxicity, while isoeffective tumor response was maintained across all conditions.

Dosimetric validation of SmART-RAD Monte Carlo modelling for x-ray cabinet radiobiology irradiators

Objective. Accuracy and reproducibility in the measurement of radiation dose and associated reporting are critically important for the validity of basic and preclinical radiobiological studies performed with kilovolt x-ray radiation cabinets. This is essential to enable results of radiobiological studies to be repeated, as well as enable valid comparisons between laboratories. In addition, the commonly used single point dose value hides the 3D dose heterogeneity across the irradiated sample. This is particularly true for preclinical rodent models, and is generally difficult to measure directly. Radiation transport simulations integrated in an easy to use application could help researchers improve quality of dosimetry and reporting.Approach. This paper describes the use and dosimetric validation of a newly-developed Monte Carlo (MC) tool, SmART-RAD, to simulate the x-ray field in a range of standard commercial x-ray cabinet irradiators used for preclinical irradiations. Comparisons are made between simulated and experimentally determined dose distributions for a range of configurations to assess the potential use of this tool in determining dose distributions through samples, based on more readily available air-kerma calibration point measurements.Main results. Simulations gave very good dosimetric agreement with measured depth dose distributions in phantoms containing both water and bone equivalent materials. Good spatial and dosimetric agreement between simulated and measured dose distributions was obtained when using beam-shaping shielding.Significance. The MC simulations provided by SmART-RAD provide a useful tool to go from a limited number of dosimetry measurements to detailed 3D dose distributions through a non-homogeneous irradiated sample. This is particularly important when trying to determine the dose distribution in more complex geometries. The use of such a tool can improve reproducibility and dosimetry reporting in preclinical radiobiological research.

Benchmarking proton RBE models

Objective.To biologically optimise proton therapy, models which can accurately predict variations in proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) are essential. Current phenomenological models show large disagreements in RBE predictions, due to different model assumptions and differences in the data to which they were fit. In this work, thirteen RBE models were benchmarked against a comprehensive proton RBE dataset to evaluate predictions when all models are fit using the same data and fitting techniques, and to assess the statistical robustness of the models.Approach.Model performance was initially evaluated by fitting to the full dataset, and then a cross-validation approach was applied to assess model generalisability and robustness. The impact of weighting the fit and the choice of biological endpoint (either single or multiple survival levels) was also evaluated.Main results.Fitting the models to a common dataset reduced differences between their predictions, however significant disagreements remained due to different underlying assumptions. All models performed poorly under cross-validation in the weighted fits, suggesting that some uncertainties on the experimental data were significantly underestimated, resulting in over-fitting and poor performance on unseen data. The simplest model, which depends linearly on the LET but has no tissue or dose dependence, performed best for a single survival level. However, when fitting to multiple survival levels simultaneously, more complex models with tissue dependence performed better. All models had significant residual uncertainty in their predictions compared to experimental data.Significance.This analysis highlights that poor quality of error estimation on the dose response parameters introduces substantial uncertainty in model fitting. The significant residual error present in all approaches illustrates the challenges inherent in fitting to large, heterogeneous datasets and the importance of robust statistical validation of RBE models.

Radiological injuries under low energy x-rays in mice depending on dose and protocol: comparative characterization of lesion severity and impact of thein vivobone response on retrospective dose estimations

Objective. To improve our knowledge about the biological effects of over exposures involving low-energy x-rays, we developed and characterized a preclinical mouse model allowing to mimic different lesion severity degrees induced by 80 kV x-ray depending on the dose and protocol (single or repeated exposure).Approach. Mice were locally exposed (paw) to 80 kV x-rays in a single (15, 30 or 45 Gy inKair) or repeated exposition (2 × 15 or 3 × 15 Gy inKair) to assess different degrees of lesion severity. Six post-irradiation euthanasia time points (0, 7, 14, 21, 42, and 84 days) were determined to follow up the evolution of lesions based on the lesion score, weighing and cutaneous blood perfusion. The bone dose was estimated at the different time points by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy.Main results. The monitoring of the lesion severity allows to classify the exposure protocols according to their severity. EPR spectroscopy measurements allow to determine the bone dose on the day of irradiation which is 7 times higher than the initial dose for single protocols. However, the initial signal measured at the end of the repeated exposure was 27% lower than the signal measured for a single dose. The study of the kinetics of EPR signal showed a decrease of the EPR signal which is dependent on the exposure protocol but not on dose highlighting the impact of bone physiology on the bone dose estimation.Significance: the preclinical model developed allows to assess the impact of the dose and protocol on the lesion severity induced by low-energy x-ray. For the first time, the dynamics of free radicals have been quantified in anin vivomodel, highlighting that the doses actually administered can be underestimated if samples are taken weeks or even months after exposure.

Peripheral blood lymphocytes differ in DNA damage response after exposure to X-rays with different physical properties

Introduction: In radiology, low X-ray energies (<140 keV) are used to obtain an optimal image while in radiotherapy, higher X-ray energies (MeV) are used to eradicate tumor tissue. In radiation research, both these X-ray energies being used to extrapolate in vitro research to clinical practice. However, the energy deposition of X-rays depends on their energy spectrum, which might lead to changes in biological response. Therefore, this study compared the DNA damage response (DDR) in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) exposed to X-rays with varying beam quality, mean photon energy (MPE) and dose rate.Methods: The DDR was evaluated in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) by the ɣ-H2AX foci assay, the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay and an SYTOX-based cell death assay, combined with specific cell death inhibitors. Cell cultures were irradiated with a 220 kV X-ray research cabinet (SARRP, X-Strahl) or a 6 MV X-ray linear accelerator (Elekta Synergy). Three main physical parameters were investigated: beam quality (V), MPE (eV) and dose rate (Gy/min). Additional copper (Cu) filtration caused variation in the MPE (78 keV, 94 keV, 118 keV) at SARRP; dose rates were varied by adjusting tube current for 220 kV X-rays (0.33-3 Gy/min) or water-phantom depth in the 6 MV set-up (3-6 Gy/min).Results: The induction of chromosomal damage and initial (30 min) DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) were significantly higher for 220 kV X-rays compared to 6 MV X-rays, while cell death induction was similar. Specific cell death inhibitors for apoptosis, necroptosis and ferroptosis were not capable of blocking cell death after irradiation using low or high-energy X-rays. Additional Cu filtration increased the MPE, which significantly decreased the amount of chromosomal damage and DSBs. Within the tested ranges no specific effects of dose rate variation were observed.Conclusion: The DDR in PBLs is influenced by the beam quality and MPE. This study reinforces the need for consideration and inclusion of all physical parameters in radiation-related studies.

Effects of ionising radiation exposure in offspring and next generations: dosimetric aspects and uncertainties

PURPOSE

The impact of the exposure to ionizing radiation in the offspring and next generation has been investigated in the last decades and currently is the subject of study of the ICRP Task Group 121. Studying the effects of radiation exposure in pre-conceptional and post-conceptional phases can be a challenge since potential effects to the fetus vary depending on the stage of fetal development. Epidemiology and radiobiology studies are the two sources of information one can use to correlate the radiation dose to the human body and tissues and the resulting effects. For a proper evaluation of the outcomes of such studies, and a correct appraisal of the exposure/dose-effect relationship, (i) reliable dosimetry, (ii) accurate reporting, and (iii) reproducibility of results are required. Although variables related to dose, including for instance source of radiation, geometry of irradiation, dose rate etc., are usually known, especially in radiobiology studies, often important details of the irradiation are not reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on standards developed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), a review of the scientific studies used by the UNSCEAR to estimate the risk of hereditary effects, and by the ICRP in its current recommendations, was conducted to evaluate the way dosimetry was reported. Dosimetry and the related uncertainties were not adequately described in the vast majority of those studies. This does not necessarily mean that they do not provide relevant information, however it prevents from a thorough verification and reproduction of their findings. In order to guarantee the reliability and robustness of the process of revision of the estimates of risk and detriment it is therefore considered mandatory to include a careful check of the new relevant literature with regard to the criteria on the completeness and reproducibility of the dosimetric information.

Minimum reporting standards should be expected for preclinical radiobiology irradiators and dosimetry in the published literature

The cornerstones of science advancement are rigor in performing scientific research, reproducibility of research findings and unbiased reporting of design and results of the experiments. For radiation research, this requires rigor in describing experimental details as well as the irradiation protocols for accurate, precise and reproducible dosimetry. Most institutions conducting radiation biology research in in vitro or animal models do not have describe experimental irradiation protocols in sufficient details to allow for balanced review of their publication nor for other investigators to replicate published experiments. The need to increase and improve dosimetry standards, traceability to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standard beamlines, and to provide dosimetry harmonization within the radiation biology community has been noted for over a decade both within the United States and France. To address this requirement subject matter experts have outlined minimum reporting standards that should be included in published literature for preclinical irradiators and dosimetry.

Framework for Quality Assurance of Ultrahigh Dose Rate Clinical Trials Investigating FLASH Effects and Current Technology Gaps

FLASH radiation therapy (FLASH-RT), delivered with ultrahigh dose rate (UHDR), may allow patients to be treated with less normal tissue toxicity for a given tumor dose compared with currently used conventional dose rate. Clinical trials are being carried out and are needed to test whether this improved therapeutic ratio can be achieved clinically. During the clinical trials, quality assurance and credentialing of equipment and participating sites, particularly pertaining to UHDR-specific aspects, will be crucial for the validity of the outcomes of such trials. This report represents an initial framework proposed by the NRG Oncology Center for Innovation in Radiation Oncology FLASH working group on quality assurance of potential UHDR clinical trials and reviews current technology gaps to overcome. An important but separate consideration is the appropriate design of trials to most effectively answer clinical and scientific questions about FLASH. This paper begins with an overview of UHDR RT delivery methods. UHDR beam delivery parameters are then covered, with a focus on electron and proton modalities. The definition and control of safe UHDR beam delivery and current and needed dosimetry technologies are reviewed and discussed. System and site credentialing for large, multi-institution trials are reviewed. Quality assurance is then discussed, and new requirements are presented for treatment system standard analysis, patient positioning, and treatment planning. The tables and figures in this paper are meant to serve as reference points as we move toward FLASH-RT clinical trial performance. Some major questions regarding FLASH-RT are discussed, and next steps in this field are proposed. FLASH-RT has potential but is associated with significant risks and complexities. We need to redefine optimization to focus not only on the dose but also on the dose rate in a manner that is robust and understandable and that can be prescribed, validated, and confirmed in real time. Robust patient safety systems and access to treatment data will be critical as FLASH-RT moves into the clinical trials.

Varied Photon Radiation Sources Produce Differences in Cellular Response

In vitro studies allow evaluation of normal or cancer cell responses to radiation, either alone or in combination with agents used to modify these biological responses. Ionizing radiation can be produced by a variety of particles and sources, with varying energy spectra, interaction probabilities, linear energy transfer, dose uniformity, dose rates, and delivery methods. Multiple radiation sources have been used to irradiate cells in the published literature. However, the equivalence of response in cell culture models across radiation sources has not been rigorously established. Moreover, current reporting of radiation source parameters lacks consistency and rigor which may impact the reproducibility of pre-clinical data between laboratories. Relevant choices of radiation source are also of high importance due to growing interest in comparing photon versus particle radiation effect on biological responses. Therefore, this study robustly evaluates the cellular response (cell survival, apoptosis, and DNA damage) of three distinct cell lines using four unique photon generating radiation sources. We hypothesize there may be subtle differences across the radiation sources, without an appreciable difference in cellular response. The four photon irradiation energies investigated, 662 keV, 100 kVp, 220 kVp, 6 MV, did produce subtle differences in DNA damage and cell survival when treating three distinct tumor cell lines. These variations in cellular response emphasize the need to carefully consider irradiation source, energy, and dose rate depending on study goal and endpoint.

Roadmap for precision preclinical x-ray radiation studies

This Roadmap paper covers the field of precision preclinical x-ray radiation studies in animal models. It is mostly focused on models for cancer and normal tissue response to radiation, but also discusses other disease models. The recent technological evolution in imaging, irradiation, dosimetry and monitoring that have empowered these kinds of studies is discussed, and many developments in the near future are outlined. Finally, clinical translation and reverse translation are discussed.

Characterization of Inorganic Scintillator Detectors for Dosimetry in Image-Guided Small Animal Radiotherapy Platforms

The purpose of the study was to characterize a detection system based on inorganic scintillators and determine its suitability for dosimetry in preclinical radiation research. Dose rate, linearity, and repeatability of the response (among others) were assessed for medium-energy X-ray beam qualities. The response's variation with temperature and beam angle incidence was also evaluated. Absorbed dose quality-dependent calibration coefficients, based on a cross-calibration against air kerma secondary standard ionization chambers, were determined. Relative output factors (ROF) for small, collimated fields (≤10 mm × 10 mm) were measured and compared with Gafchromic film and to a CMOS imaging sensor. Independently of the beam quality, the scintillator signal repeatability was adequate and linear with dose. Compared with EBT3 films and CMOS, ROF was within 5% (except for smaller circular fields). We demonstrated that when the detector is cross-calibrated in the user's beam, it is a useful tool for dosimetry in medium-energy X-rays with small fields delivered by Image-Guided Small Animal Radiotherapy Platforms. It supports the development of procedures for independent "live" dose verification of complex preclinical radiotherapy plans with the possibility to insert the detectors in phantoms.

GATE/Geant4-based dosimetry for ex vivo in solution irradiation of blood with radionuclides

To establish a dose-response relationship between radiation-induced DNA damage and the corresponding absorbed doses in blood irradiated with radionuclides in solution under ex vivo conditions, the absorbed dose coefficient for 1 ml for 1 h internal ex vivo irradiation of peripheral blood (d_Blood) must be determined. d_Blood is specific for each radionuclide, and it depends on the irradiation geometry. Therefore, the aim of this study is to use the Monte Carlo radiation transport code GATE/Geant4 to calculate the mean absorbed dose rates for ex vivo irradiation of blood with several radionuclides used in Nuclear Medicine.

METHODS

The Monte Carlo simulation reproduces the irradiation geometry of a blood sample of 7 ml mixed with 1 ml of a water equivalent radioactive solution in an 8 ml vial. The simulation was performed for ten different radionuclides: ¹⁸F, ⁶⁸Ga, ⁹⁰Y, ^99mTc, ¹²³I, ¹²⁴I, ¹³¹I, ¹⁷⁷Lu, ²²³Ra, and ²²⁵Ac. Two sets of simulations for each radionuclide were performed with 1x10⁹ histories. The first set was simulated with a mass density of 1.0525 g/cm³ of the blood plus water mixture. The second set of simulations was performed with a mass density of 1 g/cm³ for comparison with previous studies.

RESULTS

The values of d_Blood for ten radionuclides were calculated. The values range from 10.23 mGy∙ml∙MBq^-1 for ^99mTc to 15632.02 mGy∙ml∙MBq^-1 for ²²⁵Ac. The maximum relative change compared to previous studies was 13.0% for ¹²⁴I.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a comprehensive set of absorbed dose coefficients for 1 ml for 1 h internal ex vivo irradiation of peripheral blood in a special vial geometry and radionuclides typically used in Nuclear Medicine. Furthermore, the method proposed by this work can be easily adapted to a variety of internal irradiation conditions and serve as a reference for future studies.

Preclinical modeling of low energy X-rays radiological burn: Dosimetry study by monte carlo simulations and EPR spectroscopy

Interventional radiology has grown considerably over the last decades and become an essential tool for treatment or diagnosis. This technique is mostly beneficial and mastered but accidental overexposure can occur and lead to the appearance of deterministic effects. The lack of knowledge about the radiobiological consequences for the low-energy X-rays used for these practices makes the prognosis very uncertain for the different tissues. In order to improve the radiation protection of patients and better predict the risk of complications, we implemented a new preclinical mouse model to mimic radiological burn in interventional radiology and performed a complete characterization of the dose deposition. A new setup and collimator were designed to irradiate the hind legs of 15 mice at 30 Gy in air kerma at 80 kV. After irradiation, mice tibias were collected to evaluate bone dose by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopy measurements. Monte Carlo simulations with Geant4 were performed in simplified and voxelized phantoms to characterize the dose deposition in different tissues and evaluate the characteristics of secondary electrons (energy, path, momentum). 30 mice tibias were collected for EPR analysis. An average absorbed dose of 194.0 ± 27.0 Gy was measured in bone initially irradiated at 30 Gy in air kerma. A bone to air conversion factor of 6.5 ± 0.9 was determined. Inter sample and inter mice variability has been estimated to 13.9%. Monte Carlo simulations shown the heterogeneity of the dose deposition for these low X-rays energies and the dose enhancement in dense tissue. The specificities of the secondary electrons were studied and showed the influence of the tissue density on energies and paths. A good agreement between the experimental and calculated bone to air conversion factor was obtained. A new preclinical model allowing to perform radiological burn in interventional radiology-like conditions was implemented. For the development of new preclinical radiobiological model where the exact knowledge of the dose deposited in the different tissues is essential, the complementarity of Monte Carlo simulations and experimental measurements for the dosimetric characterization has proven to be a considerable asset.

The Mayo Clinic Florida Microdosimetric Kinetic Model of Clonogenic Survival: Application to Various Repair-Competent Rodent and Human Cell Lines

The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) calculations used during the planning of ion therapy treatments are generally based on the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) and the local effect model (LEM). The Mayo Clinic Florida MKM (MCF MKM) was recently developed to overcome the limitations of previous MKMs in reproducing the biological data and to eliminate the need for ion-exposed in vitro data as input for the model calculations. Since we are considering to implement the MCF MKM in clinic, this article presents (a) an extensive benchmark of the MCF MKM predictions against corresponding in vitro clonogenic survival data for 4 rodent and 10 cell lines exposed to ions from 1H to 238U, and (b) a systematic comparison with published results of the latest version of the LEM (LEM IV). Additionally, we introduce a novel approach to derive an approximate value of the MCF MKM model parameters by knowing only the animal species and the mean number of chromosomes. The overall good agreement between MCF MKM predictions and in vitro data suggests the MCF MKM can be reliably used for the RBE calculations. In most cases, a reasonable agreement was found between the MCF MKM and the LEM IV.

Dose Variations Using an X-Ray Cabinet to Establish in vitro Dose-Response Curves for Biological Dosimetry Assays

In biological dosimetry, dose-response curves are essential for reliable retrospective dose estimation of individual exposure in case of a radiation accident. Therefore, blood samples are irradiated in vitro and evaluated based on the applied assay. Accurate physical dosimetry of the irradiation performance is a critical part of the experimental procedure and is influenced by the experimental setup, especially when X-ray cabinets are used. The aim of this study was to investigate variations and pitfalls associated with the experimental setups used to establish calibration curves in biological dosimetry with X-ray cabinets. In this study, irradiation was performed with an X-ray source (195 kV, 10 mA, 0.5 mm Cu filter, dose rate 0.52 Gy/min, 1st and 2nd half-value layer = 1.01 and 1.76 mm Cu, respectively, average energy 86.9 keV). Blood collection tubes were irradiated with a dose of 1 Gy in vertical or horizontal orientation in the center of the beam area with or without usage of an additional fan heater. To evaluate the influence of the setups, physical dose measurements using thermoluminescence dosimeters, electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry and ionization chamber as well as biological effects, quantified by dicentric chromosomes and micronuclei, were compared. This study revealed that the orientation of the sample tubes (vertical vs. horizontal) had a significant effect on the radiation dose with a variation of -41% up to +49% and contributed to a dose gradient of up to 870 mGy inside the vertical tubes due to the size of the sample tubes and the associated differences in the distance to the focal point of the tube. The number of dicentric chromosomes and micronuclei differed by ~30% between both orientations. An additional fan heater had no consistent impact. Therefore, dosimetric monitoring of experimental irradiation setups is mandatory prior to the establishment of calibration curves in biological dosimetry. Careful consideration of the experimental setup in collaboration with physicists is required to ensure traceability and reproducibility of irradiation conditions, to correlate the radiation dose and the number of aberrations correctly and to avoid systematical bias influencing the dose estimation in the frame of biological dosimetry.

A scoping review of small animal image-guided radiotherapy research: Advances, impact and future opportunities in translational radiobiology

Background and purpose

To provide a scoping review of published studies using small animal irradiators and highlight the progress in preclinical radiotherapy (RT) studies enabled by these platforms since their development and commercialization in 2007.

Materials and methods

PubMed searches and manufacturer records were used to identify 907 studies that were screened with 359 small animal RT studies included in the analyses. These articles were classified as biology or physics contributions and into subgroups based on research aims, experimental models and other parameters to identify trends in the preclinical RT research landscape.

Results

From 2007 to 2021, most published articles were biology contributions (62%) whilst physics contributions accounted for 38% of the publications. The main research areas of physics articles were in dosimetry and calibration (24%), treatment planning and simulation (22%), and imaging (22%) and the studies predominantly used phantoms (41%) or in vivo models (34%). The majority of biology contributions were tumor studies (69%) with brain being the most commonly investigated site. The most frequently investigated areas of tumor biology were evaluating radiosensitizers (33%), model development (30%) and imaging (21%) with cell-line derived xenografts the most common model (82%). 31% of studies focused on normal tissue radiobiology and the lung was the most investigated site.

Conclusions

This study captures the trends in preclinical RT research using small animal irradiators from 2007 to 2021. Our data show the increased uptake and outputs from preclinical RT studies in important areas of biology and physics research that could inform translation to clinical trials.

A preclinical radiotherapy dosimetry audit using a realistic 3D printed murine phantom

Preclinical radiation research lacks standardized dosimetry procedures that provide traceability to a primary standard. Consequently, ensuring accuracy and reproducibility between studies is challenging. Using 3D printed murine phantoms we undertook a dosimetry audit of Xstrahl Small Animal Radiation Research Platforms (SARRPs) installed at 7 UK centres. The geometrically realistic phantom accommodated alanine pellets and Gafchromic EBT3 film for simultaneous measurement of the dose delivered and the dose distribution within a 2D plane, respectively. Two irradiation scenarios were developed: (1) a 10 × 10 mm2 static field targeting the pelvis, and (2) a 5 × 5 mm2 90° arc targeting the brain. For static fields, the absolute difference between the planned dose and alanine measurement across all centres was 4.1 ± 4.3% (mean ± standard deviation), with an overall range of - 2.3 to 10.5%. For arc fields, the difference was - 1.2% ± 6.1%, with a range of - 13.1 to 7.7%. EBT3 dose measurements were greater than alanine by 2.0 ± 2.5% and 3.5 ± 6.0% (mean ± standard deviation) for the static and arc fields, respectively. 2D dose distributions showed discrepancies to the planned dose at the field edges. The audit demonstrates that further work on preclinical radiotherapy quality assurance processes is merited.

A comprehensive and efficient quality assurance program for an image-guided small animal irradiation system

In the field of preclinical radiotherapy, many new developments were driven by technical innovations. To make research of different groups comparable in that context and reliable, high quality has to be maintained. Therefore, standardized protocols and programs should be used. Here we present a guideline for a comprehensive and efficient quality assurance program for an image-guided small animal irradiation system, which is meant to test all the involved subsystems (imaging, treatment planning, and the irradiation system in terms of geometric accuracy and dosimetric aspects) as well as the complete procedure (end-to-end test) in a time efficient way. The suggestions are developed on a Small Animal Radiation Research Platform (SARRP) from Xstrahl (Xstrahl Ltd., Camberley, UK) and are presented together with proposed frequencies (from monthly to yearly) and experiences on the duration of each test. All output and energy related measurements showed stable results within small variation. Also, the motorized parts (couch, gantry) and other geometrical alignments were very stable. For the checks of the imaging system, the results are highly dependent on the chosen protocol and differ according to the settings. We received nevertheless stable and comparably good results for our mainly used protocol. All investigated aspects of treatment planning were exactly fulfilled and also the end-to-end test showed satisfying values. The mean overall time we needed for our checks to have a well monitored machine is less than two hours per month.

Spaceflight Stressors and Skin Health

Traveling to space puts astronauts at risk of developing serious health problems. Of particular interest is the skin, which is vitally important in protecting the body from harmful environmental factors. Although data obtained from long-duration spaceflight studies are inconsistent, there have been indications of increased skin sensitivity and signs of dermal atrophy in astronauts. To better understand the effects of spaceflight stressors including microgravity, ionizing radiation and psychological stress on the skin, researchers have turned to in vitro and in vivo simulation models mimicking certain aspects of the spaceflight environment. In this review, we provide an overview of these simulation models and highlight studies that have improved our understanding on the effect of simulation spaceflight stressors on skin function. Data show that all aforementioned spaceflight stressors can affect skin health. Nevertheless, there remains a knowledge gap regarding how different spaceflight stressors in combination may interact and affect skin health. In future, efforts should be made to better simulate the spaceflight environment and reduce uncertainties related to long-duration spaceflight health effects.

Traceable dosimetry for MeV ion beams

Standard dosimetry protocols exist for highly penetrating photon and particle beams used in the clinic and in research. However, these protocols cannot be directly applied to shallow penetration MeV-range ion beams. The Radiological Research Accelerator Facility has been using such beams for almost 50 years to irradiate cell monolayers, using self-developed dosimetry, based on tissue equivalent ionization chambers. To better align with the internationally accepted standards, we describe implementation of a commercial, NIST-traceable, air-filled ionization chamber for measurement of absorbed dose to water from low energy ions, using radiation quality correction factors calculated using TRS-398 recommendations. The reported dose does not depend on the ionization density in the range of 10-150 keV/μm.

Dose calculations for pre-clinical radiobiology experiments conducted with single-field cabinet irradiators

PURPOSE

To provide percentage depth-dose (PDD) data along the central axis for dosimetry calculations in small-animal radiation biology experiments performed in cabinet irradiators. The PDDs are provided as a function of source-to-surface distance (SSD), field size and animal size.

METHODS

The X-ray tube designs for four biological cabinet irradiators, the RS2000, RT250, MultiRad350 and XRAD320, were simulated using the BEAMnrc Monte Carlo code to generate 160, 200, 250 and 320 kVp photon beams, respectively. The 320 kVp beam was simulated with two filtrations: a soft F1 aluminium filter and a hard F2 thoraeus filter made of aluminium, tin and copper. Beams were collimated into circular fields with diameters of 0.5 - 10 cm at SSDs of 10 - 60 cm. Monte Carlo dose calculations in 1 - 5-cm diameter homogeneous (soft tissue) small-animal phantoms as well as in heterogeneous phantoms with 3-mm diameter cylindrical lung and bone inserts (rib and cortical bone) were performed using DOSXYZnrc. The calculated depth doses in three test-cases were estimated by applying SSD, field size and animal size correction factors to a reference case (40 cm SSD, 1 cm field and 5 cm animal size) and these results were compared with the specifically simulated (i.e., expected) doses to assess the accuracy of this method. Dosimetry for two test-case scenarios of 160 and 250 kVp beams (representative of end-user beam qualities) was also performed, whereby the simulated PDDs at two different depths were compared with the results based on the interpolation from reference data.

RESULTS

The depth doses for three test-cases calculated at 200, 320 kVp F1 and 320 kVp F2, with half value layers (HVL) ranging from ∼0.6 mm to 3.6 mm Cu, agreed well with the expected doses, yielding dose differences of 1.2, 0.1 and 1.0%, respectively. The two end-user test-cases for 160 and 250 kVp beams with respective HVLs of ∼0.8 and 1.8 mm Cu yielded dose differences of 1.4 and 3.2% between the simulated and the interpolated PDDs. The dose increase at the bone-tissue proximal interface ranged from 1.2 to 2.5 times the dose in soft tissue for rib and 1.3 to 3.7 times for cortical bone. The dose drop-off at 1-cm depth beyond the bone ranged from 1.3 - 6.0% for rib and 3.2 - 11.7% for cortical bone. No drastic dose perturbations occurred in the presence of lung, with lung-tissue interface dose of >99% of soft tissue dose and <3% dose increase at 1-cm depth beyond lung.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed dose estimation method can be used to translate the measured dose at a point to dose at any depth in small-animal phantoms, making it feasible for pre-clinical calculation of dose distributions in animals irradiated with cabinet-style irradiators. The dosimetric impact of bone must be accurately quantified as dramatic dose perturbations at and beyond the bone interfaces can occur due to the relative importance of the photoelectric effect at kilovoltage energies. These results will help improve dosimetric accuracy in pre-clinical experiments. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The radiotherapy quality assurance gap among phase III cancer clinical trials

PURPOSE

Quality assurance (QA) practices improve the quality level of oncology trials by ensuring that the protocol is followed and the results are valid and reproducible. This study investigated the utilization of QA among randomized controlled trials that involve radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We searched ClinicalTrials.gov in February 2020 for all phase III oncology randomized clinical trials (RCTs). These trials were screened for RT-specific RCTs that had published primary trial results. Information regarding QA in each trial was collected from the study publications and trial protocol if available. Two individuals independently performed trial screening and data collection. Pearson's Chi-square tests analyses were used to assess factors that were associated with QA inclusion in RT trials.

RESULTS

Forty-two RCTs with RT as the primary intervention or as a mandatory component of the protocol were analyzed; the earliest was started in 1994 and one trial was still active though not recruiting. Twenty-nine (69%) trials mandated RT quality assurance (RTQA) practices as part of the trial protocol, with 19 (45%) trials requiring institutional credentialing. Twenty-one (50%) trials published protocol deviation outcomes. Clinical trials involving advanced radiation techniques (IMRT, VMAT, SRS, SBRT) did not include more RTQA than trials without these advanced techniques (73% vs. 65%, p = 0.55). Trials that reported protocol deviation outcomes were associated with mandating RTQA in their protocols as compared to trials that did not report these outcomes (100% vs. 38%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of RTQA utilization and transparency in RT clinical trials. It is imperative for RT trials to include increased QA for safe, consistent, and high-quality RT planning and delivery.

Evaluation of a micro ionization chamber for dosimetric measurements in image-guided preclinical irradiation platforms

Image-guided small animal irradiation platforms deliver small radiation fields in the medium energy x-ray range. Commissioning of such platforms, followed by dosimetric verification of treatment planning, are mostly performed with radiochromic film. There is a need for independent measurement methods, traceable to primary standards, with the added advantage of immediacy in obtaining results. This investigation characterizes a small volume ionization chamber in medium energy x-rays for reference dosimetry in preclinical irradiation research platforms. The detector was exposed to a set of reference x-ray beams (0.5 to 4 mm Cu HVL). Leakage, reproducibility, linearity, response to detector's orientation, dose rate, and energy dependence were determined for a 3D PinPoint ionization chamber (PTW 31022). Polarity and ion recombination were also studied. Absorbed doses at 2 cm depth were compared, derived either by applying the experimentally determined cross-calibration coefficient at a typical small animal radiation platform "user's" quality (0.84 mm Cu HVL) or by interpolation from air kerma calibration coefficients in a set of reference beam qualities. In the range of reference x-ray beams, correction for ion recombination was less than 0.1%. The largest polarity correction was 1.4% (for 4 mm Cu HVL). Calibration and correction factors were experimentally determined. Measurements of absorbed dose with the PTW 31022, in conditions different from reference were successfully compared to measurements with a secondary standard ionization chamber. The implementation of an End-to-End test for delivery of image-targeted small field plans resulted in differences smaller than 3% between measured and treatment planning calculated doses. The investigation of the properties and response of a PTW 31022 small volume ionization chamber in medium energy x-rays and small fields can contribute to improve measurement uncertainties evaluation for reference and relative dosimetry of small fields delivered by preclinical irradiators while maintaining the traceability chain to primary standards.

Comparison between the results of a recently-developed biological weighting function (V79-RBE10BWF) and thein vitroclonogenic survival RBE10of other repair-competent asynchronized normoxic mammalian cell lines and ions not used for the development of the model

728 simulated microdosimetric lineal energy spectra (26 different ions between 1H and 238U, 28 energy points from 1 to 1000 MeV/n) were used in combination with a recently-developed biological weighting function (Parisi et al., 2020) and 571 published in vitro clonogenic survival curves in order to: 1) assess prediction intervals for the in silico results by deriving an empirical indication of the experimental uncertainty from the dispersion in the in vitro hamster lung fibroblast (V79) data used for the development of the biophysical model; 2) explore the possibility of modeling the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of the 10% clonogenic survival of asynchronized normoxic repair-competent mammalian cell lines other than the one used for the development of the model (V79); 3) investigate the predictive power of the model through a comparison between in silico results and in vitro data for 10 ions not used for the development of the model. At first, different strategies for the assessment of the in silico prediction intervals were compared. The possible sources of uncertainty responsible for the dispersion in the in vitro data were also shortly reviewed. Secondly, also because of the relevant scatter in the in vitro data, no statistically-relevant differences were found between the RBE10 of the investigated different asynchronized normoxic repair-competent mammalian cell lines. The only exception (Chinese Hamster peritoneal fibroblasts, B14FAF28), is likely due to the limited dataset (all in vitro ion data were extracted from a single publication), systematic differences in the linear energy transfer (LET) calculations for the employed very-heavy ions, and the use of reference photon survival curves extracted from a different publication. Finally, the in silico predictions for the 10 ions not used for the model development were in good agreement with the corresponding in vitro data.

Radiation field and dose inhomogeneities using an X-ray cabinet in radiation biology research

PURPOSE

X-ray cabinets are replacing ¹³⁷ Cs/⁶⁰ Co sources in radiation biology research due to advantages in size, handling, and radiation protection. However, because of their different physical properties, X-ray cabinets are more susceptible to experimental influences than conventional sources. The aim of this study was to examine the variations related to the experimental setups typically used to investigate biological radiation effects with X-ray cabinets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A combined approach of physical dose measurements by thermoluminescence dosimetry and detection of biological effects by quantification of γH2AX and 53BP1 foci was used to analyze field inhomogeneity and evaluate the influence of the components of the experimental setup.

RESULTS

Irradiation was performed using an X-ray tube (195 kV, 10 mA, 0.5-mm-thick copper filter, dose rate of 0.59 Gy/min). Thermoluminescence dosimetry revealed inhomogeneity and a dose decrease of up to 42.3% within the beam area (diameter 31.1 cm) compared to the dose at the center. This dose decrease was consistent with the observed decline in the number of radiation-induced foci by up to 55.9 %. Uniform dose distribution was measured after reducing the size of the radiation field (diameter 12.5 cm). However, when using 15-ml test tubes placed at different positions within this field, the dose decreased by up to 17% in comparison to the central position. Analysis of foci number revealed significant differences between the tubes for γH2AX (1 h) and 53BP1 (4 h) at different time points after irradiation. Neither removal of some tubes nor of the caps improved the dose decrease significantly. By contrast, when using 1.5-ml tubes, dose differences were less than 4%, and no significant differences in foci number were detected.

CONCLUSION

X-ray cabinets are user-friendly irradiation units for investigating biological radiation effects. However, field inhomogeneities and experimental setup components considerably affect the delivered irradiation doses. For this reason, strict dosimetric monitoring of experimental irradiation setups is mandatory for reliable studies.