1
|
van den Berg K, Banken E, van Rees JM, Coolen LM, de Vries M, Voogt ELK, Rothbarth J, Rutten HJT, Nederend J, van Hellemond IEG, Creemers GJM, Verhoef C, Burger JWA. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer: A retrospective comparison of two Dutch tertiary referral centres. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2025; 51:109699. [PMID: 39987817 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2024] [Revised: 01/02/2025] [Accepted: 02/12/2025] [Indexed: 02/25/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, at increased risk of failing current treatment regimens, is unknown. This study compared the complete response rate and long-term survival of these patients treated with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to chemoradiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer, who were surgically treated or entered a watch and wait approach after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Erasmus Medical Centre or Catharina Hospital between 2016 and 2020, were retrospectively identified. High-risk was defined as the presence of tumour invasion into the mesorectal fascia, grade 4 extramural venous invasion, enlarged lateral lymph nodes, or tumour deposits. The primary endpoint was complete response rate, which was defined as a histopathological complete response or a sustained (during 12 months) clinical complete response. Long-term oncological outcomes were evaluated based on Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression survival analyses. RESULTS The neoadjuvant chemotherapy group consisted of 64 patients, of whom 61 (95.3 %) were treated with chemotherapy prior to chemoradiotherapy, the chemoradiotherapy group of 194 patients. The complete response rates were 25.0 % and 9.8 %, respectively (P = 0.002). The estimated 3-year overall survival was 92.2 % in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group versus 66.9 % in the chemoradiotherapy group. CONCLUSION Excellent oncological outcomes were observed in patients with high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer selected during a multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. The actual difference with patients treated with chemoradiotherapy alone should be investigated in prospective trials. Pretreatment referral to expert MDTs is encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K van den Berg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| | - E Banken
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - J M van Rees
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Hospital Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L M Coolen
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M de Vries
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Hospital Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E L K Voogt
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - J Rothbarth
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Hospital Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H J T Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - I E G van Hellemond
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - G J M Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Hospital Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bhutiani N, Ochiai K, Peacock O, You YN, Bednarski BK, Messick C, Skibber JM, White MG, Chang GJ, Konishi T, Uppal A. Risk Factors for Regrowth After Nonoperative Management for Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32:3098-3105. [PMID: 39924589 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16838-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2024] [Accepted: 12/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/11/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among patients with rectal cancer who achieve a complete clinical response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy and undergo nonoperative management (NOM), a subset experience tumor regrowth and require salvage surgery. We sought to identify clinicopathologic factors associated with tumor regrowth to assist in patient selection for NOM. METHODS Patients treated for rectal cancer at a single National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center in whom NOM was pursued based on cCR or near-cCR were identified. Patients were stratified based on whether they developed tumor regrowth during follow-up. Tumor and treatment details were compared to identify factors affecting regrowth-free survival (RFS). RESULTS Among 125 patients, 26 (20.8%) experienced local regrowth and 8 (6.4%) experienced distant metastasis at a median follow-up of 35 months. Extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) and clinically positive pelvic sidewall lymph nodes (PSW) were associated with worse RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-5.72, p = 0.03; HR 2.77, 95% CI 1.16-6.61, p = 0.002). Among 107 patients eligible for post hoc endoscopic evaluation, those with cCR (n = 80) at first endoscopic re-evaluation had trended towards higher RFS than those with near-cCR (n = 27; HR 2.12, 95% CI 0.95-4.75, p = 0.07), with a significant difference in patients without regrowth at 1 year (HR 5.58, 95% CI 1.23-25.32, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Rectal cancer patients with high-risk magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, namely EMVI and positive PSW nodes, are more likely to experience tumor regrowth despite an excellent clinical response. Patients with a near-complete endoscopic response may also be at higher risk of later regrowth. The decision to attempt NOM should be carefully weighed against the increased risk of tumor regrowth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Bhutiani
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kentaro Ochiai
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Oliver Peacock
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Y Nancy You
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brian K Bednarski
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Craig Messick
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John M Skibber
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael G White
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tsuyoshi Konishi
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abhineet Uppal
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Emory University Department of Surgery, Atlanta, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beyer K, Lauscher JC. [Rectal Cancer: Optimal Preoperative Diagnostics]. Zentralbl Chir 2025; 150:151-157. [PMID: 40199372 DOI: 10.1055/a-2557-4857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2025]
Abstract
Preoperative diagnostics for rectal cancer aim to determine the extent of local and systemic spread. Local staging includes rectoscopy with accurate height localisation, histological confirmation, MRI of the pelvis and, particularly in the case of localised tumours, endosonography. In addition to tumour height and possible infiltration of adjacent organs, MRI findings should include minimum tumour distance from the mesorectal fascia and MR morphological criteria for extramural vascular invasion. In the case of lower rectal cancer, the relationship to the various components of the sphincter muscle is important in planning the surgical strategy; in the case of upper rectal cancer, the MRI findings should include possible infiltration of the peritoneal fold. As outlined in the German guidelines, the basic diagnostic tests required to detect or exclude distant metastases are a chest X-ray and an abdominal ultrasound. If unclear findings are observed, these should be supplemented by a chest and abdominal CT. In addition to the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) test, which is primarily used for follow-up, a complete colonoscopy should be performed to rule out a second malignancy in the colon. If this is not possible due to an obstructive tumour, the colonoscopy should be performed three months postoperatively. Additionally, a preoperative CT or MR colonoscopy can reliably detect larger polyps and carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Beyer
- Chirurgie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu L, Zhu JJ, Liang XH, Tong H, Song Y. Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging parameters combined with tumor markers for rectal cancer recurrence risk after surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17:101897. [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2024] [Revised: 12/12/2024] [Accepted: 12/25/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing number of studies to date have found preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features valuable in predicting the prognosis of rectal cancer (RC). However, research is still lacking on the correlation between preoperative MRI features and the risk of recurrence after radical resection of RC, urgently necessitating further in-depth exploration.
AIM To investigate the correlation between preoperative MRI parameters and the risk of recurrence after radical resection of RC to provide an effective tool for predicting postoperative recurrence.
METHODS The data of 90 patients who were diagnosed with RC by surgical pathology and underwent radical surgical resection at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University between May 2020 and December 2023 were collected through retrospective analysis. General demographic data, MRI data, and tumor markers levels were collected. According to the reviewed data of patients six months after surgery, the clinicians comprehensively assessed the recurrence risk and divided the patients into high recurrence risk (37 cases) and low recurrence risk (53 cases) groups. Independent sample t-test and χ2 test were used to analyze differences between the two groups. A logistic regression model was used to explore the risk factors of the high recurrence risk group, and a clinical prediction model was constructed. The clinical prediction model is presented in the form of a nomogram. The receiver operating characteristic curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the efficacy of the clinical prediction model.
RESULTS The detection of positive extramural vascular invasion through preoperative MRI [odds ratio (OR) = 4.29, P = 0.045], along with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (OR = 1.08, P = 0.041), carbohydrate antigen 125 (OR = 1.19, P = 0.034), and carbohydrate antigen 199 (OR = 1.27, P < 0.001) levels, are independent risk factors for increased postoperative recurrence risk in patients with RC. Furthermore, there was a correlation between magnetic resonance based T staging, magnetic resonance based N staging, and circumferential resection margin results determined by MRI and the postoperative recurrence risk. Additionally, when extramural vascular invasion was integrated with tumor markers, the resulting clinical prediction model more effectively identified patients at high risk for postoperative recurrence, thereby providing robust support for clinical decision-making.
CONCLUSION The results of this study indicate that preoperative MRI detection is of great importance for predicting the risk of postoperative recurrence in patients with RC. Monitoring these markers helps clinicians identify patients at high risk, allowing for more aggressive treatment and monitoring strategies to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Wu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu 233000, Anhui Province, China
| | - Jing-Jie Zhu
- Department of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu 233000, Anhui Province, China
| | - Xiao-Han Liang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu 233000, Anhui Province, China
| | - He Tong
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu 233000, Anhui Province, China
| | - Yan Song
- Department of Radiology, Jieshou City People’s Hospital, Fuyang 236500, Anhui Province, China
- Department of Radiology, Jieshou Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical College, Fuyang 236500, Anhui Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Modena Heming CA, Alvarez JA, Miranda J, Cardoso D, Almeida Ghezzi CL, Nogueira GF, Costa-Silva L, Damasceno RS, Morita TO, Smith JJ, Horvat N. Mastering rectal cancer MRI: From foundational concepts to optimal staging. Eur J Radiol 2025; 183:111937. [PMID: 39864243 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.111937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2024] [Revised: 01/08/2025] [Accepted: 01/14/2025] [Indexed: 01/28/2025]
Abstract
MRI plays a critical role in the local staging, restaging, surveillance, and risk stratification of patients, ensuring they receive the most tailored therapy. As such, radiologists must be familiar not only with the key MRI findings that influence management decisions but also with the appropriate MRI protocols and structured reporting. Given the complexity of selecting the optimal therapy for each patient-which often requires multidisciplinary discussions-radiologists should be well-versed in relevant treatment strategies and surgical terms, understanding their significance in guiding patient care. In this manuscript, we review the most common treatment options for managing patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, emphasizing key MRI principles and protocol characteristics for accurate staging. We also highlight important anatomical landmarks and essential factors to be described during baseline assessment. Additionally, we discuss crucial information for restaging and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Augusta Modena Heming
- Department of Radiology - Body Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52240, USA.
| | - Janet A Alvarez
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Joao Miranda
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester. 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, R. Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 75 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP 05403-010, Brazil.
| | - Daniel Cardoso
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, R. Dona Adma Jafet, 91- Bela Vista, São Paulo, SP 01308-50, Brazil
| | - Caroline Lorenzoni Almeida Ghezzi
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, R. Ramiro Barcelos, 910, Porto Alegre, RS 90035-000, Brazil; Department of Radiology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, R. Ramiro Barcelos, 2350 -903, Brazil
| | - Gerda F Nogueira
- Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, R. Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 75 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Luciana Costa-Silva
- Radiology Department, Hermes Pardini/Fleury, Belo Horizonte, R. Aimorés, 66 - Funcionários, Belo Horizonte, MG 30140-070, Brazil.
| | - Rodrigo Sanford Damasceno
- Department of Radiology - Body Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52240, USA.
| | - Tiago Oliveira Morita
- Rede Primavera, Av. Ministro Geraldo Barreto Sobral, 2277 - Jardins, Aracaju, SE 49026-010, Brazil
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester. 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, R. Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 75 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP 05403-010, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kanamathareddy HV, Lakhani A, Augustine A, Thanikaivelu S, Eapen A, John R, Simon B, Masih D, Sarvarasan I, Singh A, Chandramohan A. Prevalence of CT-detected extramural vascular invasion in gastric adenocarcinoma and its correlation with other known prognostic factors. Jpn J Radiol 2025; 43:58-67. [PMID: 39207641 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-024-01644-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To study the prevalence of extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) and its association with other prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, consecutive patients with GA who underwent staging CT between January 2021 and December 2022 were included. Two radiologists reviewed the staging CT for EMVI and its grade and documented tumor location, thickness, and TNM stage. Grade 3 and 4 EMVI were reported as ct-EMVI positive and the rest as negative. Similar findings were documented on restaging CT following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) when available. ct-EMVI was compared with imaging findings on staging and restaging CT, staging laparoscopy findings, peritoneal fluid cytology, and surgical histopathology findings. RESULTS A total of 191 patients (140 males, 51 females) with a mean age of 53 ± 9 years (range 23-93 years) were included. 82.2% had poorly differentiated GA and 17.8% had well/moderately differentiated GA. The majority (95.9%) had T3 (n = 34) and T4 (n = 118) disease on baseline CT. The prevalence of ct-EMVI on staging CT was 65% (n = 124), and 34% and 86% among the T3 and T4 GA, respectively. There was a significant association between ct-EMVI and, tumor thickness, tumor extent, ct-T, N, M stages, and especially peritoneal, lymph nodes, and liver metastases and response to NAC (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION EMVI is seen commonly in staging CT of advanced gastric cancer patients and is significantly associated with TNM stage, peritoneal metastases, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, ct-EMVI is a significant prognostic imaging biomarker in GA. IRB min no: 15713.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aisha Lakhani
- Department of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India
| | - Antony Augustine
- Department of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India
| | - Sonia Thanikaivelu
- Department of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India
| | - Anu Eapen
- Department of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India
| | - Reetu John
- Department of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India
| | - Betty Simon
- Department of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India
| | - Dipti Masih
- Department of General Pathology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India
| | - Inian Sarvarasan
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India
| | - Ashish Singh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Taşçi F, Metin Y, Metin NO, Rakici S, Gözükara MG, Taşçi E. Comparative effectiveness of two abbreviated rectal MRI protocols in assessing tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. Oncol Lett 2024; 28:565. [PMID: 39385951 PMCID: PMC11462512 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 10/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols in assessing the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with rectal cancer. Data from the examinations of 62 patients with rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant CRT and standard contrast-enhanced rectal MRI were retrospectively evaluated. Standard contrast-enhanced T2-weighted imaging (T2-WI), post-contrast T1-weighted imaging (T1-WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI, as well as two abbreviated protocols derived from these images, namely protocol AB1 (T2-WI and DWI) and protocol AB2 (post-contrast fat-suppressed (FS) T1-WI and DWI), were assessed. Measurements of lesion length and width, lymph node short-axis length, tumor staging, circumferential resection margin (CRM), presence of extramural venous invasion (EMVI), luminal mucin accumulation (MAIN), mucinous response, mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement, and MRI-based tumor regression grade (mrTRG) were obtained. The reliability and compatibility of the AB1 and AB2 protocols in the evaluation of tumor response were analyzed. The imaging performed according to the AB1 and AB2 protocols revealed significant decreases in lesion length, width and lymph node size after CRT. These protocols also showed reductions in lymph node positivity, CRM, MRF, EMVI.Furthermore, both protocols were found to be reliable in determining lesion length and width. Additionally, compliance was observed between the protocols in determining lymph node size and positivity, CRM involvement, and EMVI after CRT. In conclusion, the use of abbreviated MRI protocols, specifically T2-WI with DWI sequences or post-contrast FS T1-WI with DWI sequences, is effective for evaluating tumor response in patients with rectal cancer following neoadjuvant CRT. The AB protocols examined in this study yielded similar results in terms of lesion length and width, lymph node positivity, CRM involvement, EMVI, MAIN, and MRF involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filiz Taşçi
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53000 Rize, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Metin
- Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, 06230 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nurgül Orhan Metin
- Radiology Unit, Beytepe Murat Erdi Eker State Hospital, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sema Rakici
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53000 Rize, Turkey
| | - Melih Gaffar Gözükara
- Health Directorate, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Faculty of Medicine, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Erencan Taşçi
- Güneysu Physical Therapy Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, 53000 Rize, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shetty AS, Fraum TJ, Ludwig DR, Itani M, Rajput MZ, Strnad BS, Konstantinoff KS, Chang AL, Kapoor S, Parwal U, Balfe DM, Mellnick VM. Imaging of the Inferior Mesenteric Vasculature. Radiographics 2024; 44:e240047. [PMID: 39446611 DOI: 10.1148/rg.240047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2024]
Abstract
The inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) supply and drain blood from the distal colon and rectum, respectively. Routinely imaged at cross-sectional imaging of the abdomen and pelvis, these vessels play a vital role in gastrointestinal tract health but may be neglected due to their diminutive caliber relative to other mesenteric vessels and potential lack of inclusion in routine search patterns. The authors describe and illustrate normal and abnormal appearances of the IMA and IMV and findings that are diagnostic of primary vascular abnormalities or can offer diagnostic clues. After the embryologic features, normal anatomy, and anatomic variants of the IMA and IMV are reviewed, various manifestations of IMA and IMV abnormalities, such as aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm, stenosis, occlusion, dissection, hemorrhage, arteriovenous malformations and fistulas, tumoral invasion, vasculitis, and perivascular lymphatic dilatation, are explored with use of case examples. The role of the IMA and IMV as collateral vasculature, including the clinical scenarios of superior mesenteric arterial occlusion, aortic endoleak, and portosystemic venous shunt, are discussed. Finally, diagnostic clues that the inferior mesenteric vessels and adjacent soft tissues can provide, including mesenteric venous gas, compression or displacement from bowel volvulus or internal hernias, lymphadenopathy, and venous flow artifacts, are highlighted. The authors provide a comprehensive reference for radiologists who evaluate the IMA and IMV on cross-sectional images and shine a spotlight on these neglected but important vessels. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anup S Shetty
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Tyler J Fraum
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Daniel R Ludwig
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Malak Itani
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Mohamed Z Rajput
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Benjamin S Strnad
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Katerina S Konstantinoff
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Andrew L Chang
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Suraj Kapoor
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Utkarsh Parwal
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Dennis M Balfe
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Vincent M Mellnick
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Djuric M, Kožik B, Vasiljevic T, Djermanovic A, Stanulovic N, Djuric M. Prognostic Value of Separate Extramural Vascular Invasion Reporting in Operative Samples of Rectal Cancer: Single-Institutional Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3579. [PMID: 39518020 PMCID: PMC11545365 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16213579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2024] [Revised: 10/13/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Vascular invasion, especially extramural vascular invasion (EMVI), has emerged as a prognostic parameter for rectal cancer (RC) in recent years. Prediction of recurrence and metastasis development poses a significant challenge for oncologists, who need markers for prediction of adverse outcome. The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic significance of pathohistologically detected EMVI in untreated rectal cancer and its implications in separate reporting. METHODS We examined 100 untreated RC patients who underwent curative resection from January 2016 to June 2018 with a follow-up of 5 years. Patients were divided into equal EMVI- and EMVI+ groups based on histological re-examination of H&E-stained postoperative surgical samples. RESULTS The presence of EMVI within the selected cohort was significantly associated with female gender, T3/T4 and N1/N2 post-operative stages, positive lymph nodes, lymph node ratio LNR2 and LNR3 groups, abundant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, positive lympho-vascular invasion (LVI), perineural (PNI), and circumferential resection margin (CRM) (p < 0.05 in all tests). Within EMVI+ patients, local recurrences and/or metastases and death outcomes were more frequent events (p = 0.029 and p = 0.035, respectively), while survival analyses revealed that EMVI+ patients had significantly shorter overall survival (OS, p = 0.040) and disease-free survival (DFS, p = 0.028). Concerning LVI, differences in OS between LVI+ and LVI- patients were not statistically significant (p = 0.068), while LVI+ patients had significantly shorter DFS (p = 0.024). Moreover, univariate COX regression analysis demonstrated the negative impact of EMVI on OS (HR: 2.053, 95% CI: 1.015-4.152; p = 0.045) and DFS (HR: 2.106, 95% CI: 1.066-4.870; p = 0.038), which was not the case for LVI + RC patients. CONCLUSIONS The obtained results strongly suggest the significance of separate reporting of EMVI from lympho-vascular invasion, as it is potentially a surrogate marker for adverse prognosis and outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mladen Djuric
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, 21137 Novi Sad, Serbia; (M.D.); (T.V.); (N.S.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, 21204 Sremska Kamenica, Serbia;
| | - Bojana Kožik
- Laboratory for Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Tijana Vasiljevic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, 21137 Novi Sad, Serbia; (M.D.); (T.V.); (N.S.)
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostic, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, 21204 Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Aleksandar Djermanovic
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, 21204 Sremska Kamenica, Serbia;
| | - Nevena Stanulovic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, 21137 Novi Sad, Serbia; (M.D.); (T.V.); (N.S.)
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostic, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, 21204 Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Marina Djuric
- Department of Gynecology, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, 21204 Sremska Kamenica, Serbia;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li S, Song M, Tie J, Zhu X, Zhang Y, Wang H, Geng J, Liu Z, Sui X, Teng H, Cai Y, Li Y, Wang W. Outcomes and failure patterns after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer with positive lateral pelvic lymph nodes: a propensity score-matched analysis. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:132. [PMID: 39354612 PMCID: PMC11443637 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02529-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/03/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to use propensity score matching (PSM) to explore the long-term outcomes and failure patterns in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients with positive versus negative lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with LARC were retrospectively divided into LPLN-positive and LPLN-negative groups. Clinical characteristics were compared between the groups using the chi-square test. PSM was applied to balance these differences. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and local-regional recurrence (LRR) and distant metastasis (DM) rates were compared between the groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. RESULTS A total of 651 LARC patients were included, 160 (24.6%) of whom had positive LPLN and 491 (75.4%) had negative LPLN. Before PSM, the LPLN-positive group had higher rates of lower location (53.1% vs. 43.0%, P = 0.025), T4 stage (37.5% vs. 23.2%, P = 0.002), mesorectal fascia (MRF)-positive (53.9% vs. 35.4%, P < 0.001) and extramural venous invasion (EMVI)-positive (51.2% vs. 27.2%, P < 0.001) disease than the LPLN-negative group. After PSM, there were 114 patients for each group along with the balanced clinical factors, and both groups had comparable surgery, pathologic complete response (pCR), and ypN stage rates. The median follow-up was 45.9 months, 3-year OS (88.3% vs. 92.1%, P = 0.276) and LRR (5.7% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.172) rates were comparable between LPLN-positive and LPLN-negative groups. Meanwhile, despite no statistical difference, 3-year PFS (78.8% vs. 85.9%, P = 0.065) and DM (20.4% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.061) rates slightly differed between the groups. 45 patients were diagnosed with DM, 11 (39.3%) LPLN-positive and 3 (17.6%) LPLN-negative patients were diagnosed with oligometastases (P = 0.109). CONCLUSIONS Our study indicates that for LPLN-positive patients, there is a tendency of worse PFS and DM than LPLN-negative patients, and for this group patients, large samples are needed to further confirm our conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuai Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Maxiaowei Song
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Jian Tie
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Xianggao Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yangzi Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Hongzhi Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Jianhao Geng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Zhiyan Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Xin Sui
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Huajing Teng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yong Cai
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yongheng Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
| | - Weihu Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Khasawneh H, Khatri G, Sheedy SP, Nougaret S, Lambregts DMJ, Santiago I, Kaur H, Smith JJ, Horvat N. MRI for Rectal Cancer: Updates and Controversies- AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024. [PMID: 39320354 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.24.31523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
Abstract
Rectal MRI is a critical tool in the care of patients with rectal cancer, having established roles for primary staging, restaging, and surveillance. The comprehensive diagnostic and prognostic information provided by MRI helps to optimize treatment decision-making. However, challenges persist in the standardization and interpretation of rectal MRI, particularly in the context of rapidly evolving treatment paradigms, including growing acceptance of nonoperative management. In this AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review, we address recent advances and key areas of contention relating to the use of MRI for rectal cancer. Our objectives include: to discuss concepts regarding anatomic localization of rectal tumors; review the evolving rectal cancer treatment paradigm and implications for MRI assessment; discuss updates and controversies regarding rectal MRI for locoregional staging, restaging, and surveillance; review current rectal MRI acquisition protocols; and discuss challenges in homogenizing and optimizing acquisition parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hala Khasawneh
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Gaurav Khatri
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Shannon P Sheedy
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Stephanie Nougaret
- Department of Radiology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France; Montpellier Research Cancer Institute, PINKcc Lab, U1194, Montpellier, France
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inês Santiago
- Department of Radiology, Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Av. Lusíada 100, 1500-650 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Harmeet Kaur
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St, Unit 1473, Houston, TX 77030
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Associate Member, Associate Attending Surgeon Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, R. Dr. Ovidio Pires de Campos, 75-Cerqueira Cesar, Sao Paulo, 05403-010, SP, Brazil
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee T, Horvat N, Gollub MJ, Garcia-Aguilar J, Kim TH. Prognostic value of lateral lymph node metastasis in pretreatment MRI for rectal cancer in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgical resection without lateral lymph node dissection: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2024; 178:111601. [PMID: 38972182 PMCID: PMC11737601 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically review and meta-analyze the prognostic significance of lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) on pretreatment MRI in patients with rectal cancer who undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative surgical resection without lateral lymph node dissection (LLND). METHODS We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases until September 27, 2023, utilizing the following search terms: (rectal OR rectum OR colorectal) AND (lateral OR sidewall) AND (lymph OR node). The QUIPS tool was employed to evaluate methodological quality. We pooled the association between LLNM on pretreatment MRI and outcomes such as local recurrence, distant metastasis, disease-free survival, and overall survival using hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) based on random effects model. RESULTS We included 9 studies, encompassing 3180 patients. LLNM on pretreatment MRI revealed a significant association with increased local recurrence rates (HR: 4.11; 95 % CI: [1.87, 9.02]) and elevated risks for both disease-free (HR: 1.70; 95 % CI: [1.42, 2.03]) and overall survival (HR: 1.76; 95 % CI: [1.44, 2.15]). As for distant metastasis, our analysis indicated a potential trend towards increased rates, though this did not reach statistical significance (HR: 1.67; 95 % CI: [0.85, 3.27]). CONCLUSIONS Our findings underscore the relationship between LLNM and increased local recurrence and compromised disease-free and overall survival. This emphasizes the potential limitations of relying solely on neoadjuvant chemoradiation and highlights the potential need to intensify treatment in select patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taehee Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tae-Hyung Kim
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Williams H, Omer DM, Thompson HM, Lin ST, Verheij FS, Miranda J, Yuval JB, Buckley J, Marco MR, Qin LX, Dombroski DA, Kedar R, Oto A, Korngold E, Veniero JC, Gandhi S, Krishnaraj A, Jagtiani M, Ohanian K, Vu D, Hope TA, Lee S, Wasnik AP, Madhuripan N, Gollub MJ, Garcia-Aguilar J. MRI Predicts Residual Disease and Outcomes in Watch-and-Wait Patients with Rectal Cancer. Radiology 2024; 312:e232748. [PMID: 39225603 PMCID: PMC11427875 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Background MRI plays a crucial role in restaging locally advanced rectal cancer treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT); however, prospective studies have not evaluated its ability to accurately select patients for nonoperative management. Purpose To evaluate the ability of restaging MRI to predict oncologic outcomes and identify imaging features associated with residual disease (RD) after TNT. Materials and Methods This was a secondary analysis of the Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma (OPRA) trial, which randomized participants from April 2014 to March 2020 with stages II or III rectal adenocarcinoma to undergo either induction or consolidation TNT. Participants enrolled in the OPRA trial who underwent restaging MRI were eligible for inclusion in the present study. Radiologists classified participants as having clinical complete response (cCR), near-complete clinical response (nCR), or incomplete clinical response (iCR) based on restaging MRI at a mean of 8 weeks ± 4 (SD) after treatment. Oncologic outcomes according to MRI response category were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify imaging characteristics associated with RD. Results A total of 277 participants (median age, 58 years [IQR, 17 years]; 179 male) who were randomized in the OPRA trial had restaging MRI forms completed. The median follow-up duration was 4.1 years. Participants with cCR had higher rates of organ preservation compared with those with nCR (65.3% vs 41.6%, log-rank P < .001). Five-year disease-free survival for participants with cCR, nCR, and iCR was 81.8%, 67.6%, and 49.6%, respectively (log-rank P < .001). The MRI response category also predicted overall survival (log-rank P < .001), distant recurrence-free survival (log-rank P = .005), and local regrowth (log-rank P = .02). Among the 266 participants with at least 2 years of follow-up, 129 (48.5%) had RD. At multivariable analysis, the presence of restricted diffusion (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% CI: 1.22, 5.24) and abnormal nodal morphologic features (odds ratio, 5.04; 95% CI: 1.43, 23.9) remained independently associated with RD. Conclusion The MRI response category was predictive of organ preservation and survival. Restricted diffusion and abnormal nodal morphologic features on restaging MRI scans were associated with increased likelihood of residual tumor. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02008656 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Milot in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Williams
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Dana M Omer
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Hannah M Thompson
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Sabrina T Lin
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Floris S Verheij
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Joao Miranda
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Jonathan B Yuval
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - James Buckley
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Michael R Marco
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Li-Xuan Qin
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - David A Dombroski
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Rajendra Kedar
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Aytekin Oto
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Elena Korngold
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Joseph C Veniero
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Sunil Gandhi
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Arun Krishnaraj
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Minal Jagtiani
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Kirk Ohanian
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Dan Vu
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Thomas A Hope
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Sonia Lee
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Ashish P Wasnik
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Nikhil Madhuripan
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Marc J Gollub
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- From the Departments of Surgery, Colorectal Service (H.W., D.M.O., H.M.T., F.S.V., J.B.Y., J.B., M.R.M., J.G.A.), Epidemiology and Biostatistics (S.T.L., L.X.Q.), and Radiology (J.M., M.J.G.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (D.A.D.); Department of Radiology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla (R.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (A.O.); Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore (E.K.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.C.V.); Department of Radiology, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, Calif (S.G.); Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va (A.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (M.J.); Department of Radiology, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, Calif (K.O., D.V.); Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (T.A.H.); Department of Radiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, Calif (S.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.P.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo (N.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Williams H, Yuval JB, Verheij FS, Miranda J, Lin ST, Omer DM, Qin LX, Gollub MJ, Kim TH, Garcia-Aguilar J. Baseline MRI predictors of successful organ preservation in the Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma (OPRA) trial. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae246. [PMID: 39319400 PMCID: PMC11422670 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 07/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prospective randomized trials have not yet identified baseline features predictive of organ preservation in locally advanced rectal cancers treated with total neoadjuvant therapy and a selective watch-and-wait strategy. METHODS This was a secondary analysis of the OPRA trial, which randomized patients with stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma to receive either induction or consolidation total neoadjuvant therapy. Patients were recommended for total mesorectal excision, or watch and wait based on clinical response at 8 ± 4 weeks after completing treatment. Standardized baseline clinical and radiological variables were collected prospectively. Survival outcomes, including total mesorectal excision-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival, were assessed by intention-to-treat analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate associations between baseline variables and survival outcomes. RESULTS Of the 324 patients randomized for the OPRA trial, 38 (11.7%) had cT4 tumours, 230 (71.0%) cN-positive disease, 101 (32.5%) mesorectal fascia involvement, and 64 (19.8%) extramural venous invasion. Several baseline features were independently associated with recommendation for total mesorectal excision on multivariable analysis: nodal disease (HR 1.66, 95% c.i. 1.12 to 2.48), extramural venous invasion (HR 1.57, 1.07 to 2.29), mesorectal fascia involvement (HR 1.45, 1.01 to 2.09), and tumour length (HR 1.11, 1.00 to 1.22). Of these, nodal disease (HR 2.02, 1.15 to 3.53) and mesorectal fascia involvement (HR 2.02, 1.26 to 3.26) also predicted worse disease-free survival. Age (HR 1.03, 1.00 to 1.06) was associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION Baseline MRI features, including nodal disease, extramural venous invasion, mesorectal fascia involvement, and tumour length, independently predict the likelihood of organ preservation after completion of total neoadjuvant therapy. Mesorectal fascia involvement and nodal disease are associated with disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Williams
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jonathan B Yuval
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Floris S Verheij
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joao Miranda
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sabrina T Lin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dana M Omer
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Li-Xuan Qin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tae-Hyung Kim
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Geffen EGMV, Nederend J, Sluckin TC, Hazen SMJA, Horsthuis K, Beets-Tan RGH, Marijnen CAM, Tanis PJ, Kusters M. Prognostic significance of MRI-detected extramural venous invasion according to grade and response to neo-adjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer A national cohort study after radiologic training and reassessment. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108307. [PMID: 38581757 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detection of grade 3-4 extra mural venous invasion (mrEMVI) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is associated with an increased distant metastases (DM)-rate. This study aimed to determine the impact of different grades of mrEMVI and their disappearance after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS A Dutch national retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted, including patients who underwent resection for rectal cancer in 2016 from 60/69 hospitals performing rectal surgery. Patients with a cT3-4 tumour ≤8 cm from the anorectal junction were selected and their MRI-scans were reassessed by trained abdominal radiologists. Positive mrEMVI grades (3 and 4) were analyzed in regard to 4-year local recurrence (LR), DM, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The 1213 included patients had a median follow-up of 48 months (IQR 30-54). Positive mrEMVI was present in 324 patients (27%); 161 had grade 3 and 163 had grade 4. A higher mrEMVI stage (grade 4 vs grade 3 vs no mrEMVI) increased LR-risk (21% vs 18% vs 7%, <0.001) and DM-risk (49% vs 30% vs 21%, p < 0.001) and decreased DFS (42% vs 55% vs 69%, p < 0.001) and OS (62% vs 76% vs 81%, p < 0.001), which remained independently associated in multivariable analysis. When mrEMVI had disappeared on restaging MRI, DM-rate was comparable to initial absence of mrEMVI (both 26%), whereas LR-rate remained high (22% vs 9%, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION The negative oncological impact of mrEMVI on recurrence and survival rates was dependent on grading. Disappearance of mrEMVI on restaging MRI decreased the risk of DM, but not of LR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline G M van Geffen
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life and Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Nederend
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiology, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Tania C Sluckin
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life and Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sanne-Marije J A Hazen
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life and Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karin Horsthuis
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life and Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiology, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Universiteitssingel 40, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Campusvej 55, DK-5230, Odense, Denmark
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- LUMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, the Netherlands; The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life and Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC, Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Miranda Kusters
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life and Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
van den Berg K, Wang S, Willems JMWE, Creemers GJ, Roodhart JML, Shkurti J, Burger JWA, Rutten HJT, Beets-Tan RGH, Nederend J. The diagnostic accuracy of local staging in colon cancer based on computed tomography (CT): evaluating the role of extramural venous invasion and tumour deposits. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:365-374. [PMID: 38019283 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04094-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The shift from adjuvant to neoadjuvant treatment in colon cancer demands the radiological selection of patients for systemic therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the CT-based TNM stage and high-risk features, including extramural venous invasion (EMVI) and tumour deposits, in the identification of patients with histopathological advanced disease, currently considered for neoadjuvant treatment (T3-4 disease). METHODS All consecutive patients surgically treated for non-metastatic colon cancer between January 2018 and January 2020 in a referral centre for colorectal cancer were identified retrospectively. All tumours were staged on CT according to the TNM classification system. Additionally, the presence of EMVI and tumour deposits on CT was evaluated. The histopathological TNM classification was used as reference standard. RESULTS A total of 176 patients were included. Histopathological T3-4 colon cancer was present in 85.0% of the patients with CT-detected T3-4 disease. Histopathological T3-4 colon cancer was present in 96.4% of the patients with CT-detected T3-4 colon cancer in the presence of both CT-detected EMVI and CT-detected tumour deposits. Histopathological T0-2 colon cancer was present in 50.8% of the patients with CT-detected T0-2 disease, and in 32.4% of the patients without CT-detected EMVI and tumour deposits. CONCLUSION The diagnostic accuracy of CT-based staging was comparable with previous studies. The presence of high-risk features on CT increased the probability of histopathological T3-4 colon cancer. However, a substantial part of the patients without CT-detected EMVI and tumour deposits was diagnosed with histopathological T3-4 disease. Hence, more accurate selection criteria are required to correctly identify patients with locally advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K van den Berg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - S Wang
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - J M W E Willems
- Department of Medical Oncology, Anna Hospital, Geldrop, The Netherlands
| | - G J Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - J M L Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Shkurti
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - H J T Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Di Fabio F, Allievi N, Lord A, Bhagwanani A, Venkatasubramaniam A, Arnold S, Moran B. MRI-predicted extramural vascular invasion and tumour deposit are main predictors of disease-free survival in patients undergoing surgical resection for rectal cancer. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrad139. [PMID: 38170894 PMCID: PMC10763995 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND MRI is crucial in staging patients with rectal cancer and planning treatment. The aim was to analyse the prognostic role of MRI-predicted tumour deposits and/or extramural vascular invasion (mrTD/EMVI) in a cohort of patients with rectal cancer undergoing surgical resection, with selective neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). METHOD Retrospective analysis of a single-centre cohort of consecutive patients with rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection or abdominoperineal excision between 2008 and 2020. Unit policy was selective nCRT for MRI-predicted threatened or involved circumferential resection margin (mrCRM), or radiologically involved pelvic sidewall nodes. The primary outcome was disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes were rates of local recurrence, distant recurrence and overall survival. RESULTS A total of 314 patients were analysed. Median age was 65 years (female/male: 114/200). A total of 54/314 (17%) had nCRT and 35 patients (11%) underwent abdominoperineal excision. Median follow-up was 64 months. Overall, local recurrence was detected in 18/314 (5.7%) and distant recurrence in 45/314 (14.3%). In patients not receiving nCRT (n = 260), local recurrence was detected in 11/260 (4.2%) and distant recurrence in 35/260 (13.5%). Disease-free survival was 80.5% at 5 years. Specifically, disease-free survival was 89% in mrTD/EMVI-negative and mrCRM-negative, 67% in mrTD/EMVI-positive and mrCRM-negative, and 64% in the mrCRM-positive rectal cancer (log-rank, P < 0.001). On multivariable Cox-regression analysis mrTD/EMVI was the only MRI variable associated with disease-free survival (hazard ratio 2.95; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION mrTD/EMVI is a major prognostic indicator. Rectal cancer patients with mrCRM-negative and mrTD/EMVI-negative have excellent long-term outcomes with surgery alone. Patients with mrTD/EMVI-positive should be selectively stratified for neoadjuvant treatments in future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Fabio
- Rectal Cancer Unit, Colorectal Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Niccolo Allievi
- Rectal Cancer Unit, Colorectal Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Amy Lord
- Rectal Cancer Unit, Colorectal Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Anisha Bhagwanani
- Radiology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Arcot Venkatasubramaniam
- Rectal Cancer Unit, Colorectal Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Steve Arnold
- Rectal Cancer Unit, Colorectal Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Brendan Moran
- Rectal Cancer Unit, Colorectal Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Miranda J, Causa Andrieu P, Nincevic J, Gomes de Farias LDP, Khasawneh H, Arita Y, Stanietzky N, Fernandes MC, De Castria TB, Horvat N. Advances in MRI-Based Assessment of Rectal Cancer Post-Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Comprehensive Review. J Clin Med 2023; 13:172. [PMID: 38202179 PMCID: PMC10780006 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with neoadjuvant therapy playing a pivotal role in improving resectability and patient outcomes. MRI serves as a critical tool in assessing treatment response. However, differentiating viable tumor tissue from therapy-induced changes on MRI remains a complex task. In this comprehensive review, we explore treatment options for rectal cancer based on resectability status, focusing on the role of MRI in guiding therapeutic decisions. We delve into the nuances of MRI-based evaluation of treatment response following neoadjuvant therapy, paying particular attention to emerging techniques like radiomics. Drawing from our insights based on the literature, we provide essential recommendations for post-neoadjuvant therapy management of rectal cancer, all within the context of MRI-based findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joao Miranda
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; (J.N.); (Y.A.); (M.C.F.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, R. Dr. Ovidio Pires de Campos, 75 Cerqueira Cesar, Sao Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Pamela Causa Andrieu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Josip Nincevic
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; (J.N.); (Y.A.); (M.C.F.)
| | - Lucas de Padua Gomes de Farias
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, Rua Dona Adma Jafet, 91—Bela Vista, Sao Paulo 01308-050, Brazil;
- Department of Radiology, Allianca Saude, Av. Pres. Juscelino Kubitschek, 1830, Sao Paulo 01308-050, Brazil
| | - Hala Khasawneh
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA;
| | - Yuki Arita
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; (J.N.); (Y.A.); (M.C.F.)
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Nir Stanietzky
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Maria Clara Fernandes
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; (J.N.); (Y.A.); (M.C.F.)
| | - Tiago Biachi De Castria
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffit Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
| | - Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; (J.N.); (Y.A.); (M.C.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yacheva A, Dardanov D, Zlatareva D. The Multipurpose Usage of Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Rectal Cancer. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:2162. [PMID: 38138265 PMCID: PMC10744943 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59122162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Colorectal cancer is the third most common oncological disease worldwide. The standard treatment of locally advanced rectal tumors is neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in combination with surgical resection. The choice of specific treatment algorithm is highly dependent on MRI findings. The aim of this study is to show the potential role of ADC measurements in rectal cancer and their usage in different clinical scenarios. Materials and Methods: A total of 135 patients had rectal MRI evaluation. Seventy-five (56%) had histologically proven rectal adenocarcinoma and sixty (44%) were evaluated as rectal disease-free. An ADC measurement in the most prominent region of interest was obtained for all patients. Eighteen patients (24% of the rectal cancer group) had a second MRI after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with comparison of the ADC values at the same region of interest as previously measured. Results: Rectal cancer ADC values were found to be significantly lower than the ones in the control group (p < 0.001). A statistically significant correlation was found when ADC values in rectal tumors of different T stages were compared (p = 0.039)-those with higher T stage as in locally advanced disease showed lower ADC values. Patients with extramural vascular invasion showed significantly lower ADC values (p = 0.01). There was a significant increase in ADC values after treatment (p < 0.001), and a negative correlation was observed (r = -0.6572; p = 0.004)-tumors with low initial ADC values showed a higher increase in ADC. Conclusions: ADC measurements have a complementary role in the assessment of rectal cancer and have the potential to predict the response to chemoradiotherapy and improve the planning of proper treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aneta Yacheva
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital Alexandrovska, Medical University of Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Dragomir Dardanov
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Lozenetz, 1407 Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Dora Zlatareva
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital Alexandrovska, Medical University of Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen M, Ma Y, Song Y, Huang J, Gao Y, Zheng J, He F. Survival outcomes of different neoadjuvant treatment regimens in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and MRI-detected extramural venous invasion. Cancer Med 2023; 12:20523-20537. [PMID: 37864414 PMCID: PMC10660615 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE MRI-detected extramural venous invasion (mrEMVI) is associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). An mrEMVI-positive status is considered a strong indication for neoadjuvant treatment, but the optimal regimen is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively compared pathological and survival outcomes of 584 patients diagnosed with mrEMVI-positive rectal cancer between January 2013 and October 2021, and receiving either neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) alone, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) alone, or nCRT plus NCT, prior to total mesorectal excision. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance clinical bias between groups, which were compared using chi-square testing and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS Median follow-up was 33.9 (range, 10.2-100.4) months. The 3-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) rates for all patients were 90.4%, 57.5%, 61.1%, and 85.7%, respectively. Of 584 mrEMVI-positive patients at the time of diagnosis, 457 (78.3%) were EMVI-negative on surgical pathology, and they had significantly better 3-year OS, DMFS, DFS, and LRFS rates (all p < 0.001) than patients who remained EMVI-positive. After PSM was applied, patients receiving nCRT alone had significantly better 3-year OS (96.8% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.005) and DMFS (67.1% vs. 53.5%, p = 0.03) rates than those receiving NCT alone. Patients receiving NCT plus nCRT had higher pathological complete response (PCR) (10.8% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.04) and downstaging (33.8% vs. 5.3%, p < 0.001) rates than those receiving nCRT alone, but survival rates did not differ (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Most EMVI-positive patients with LARC converted to EMVI-negative after neoadjuvant treatment, resulting in improved OS and DFS. Patients receiving nCRT had more favorable survival outcomes than those receiving NCT, suggesting the importance of including neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Patients receiving NCT in addition to nCRT had higher rates of PCR and downstaging, but their survival rates were not better.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mo Chen
- Department of Genitourinary OncologyThe First People's Hospital of FoshanFoshanGuangdongChina
| | - Yan Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor DiseasesThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated HospitalSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Yi‐wen Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor DiseasesThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated HospitalSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Jinhua Huang
- Department of Minimal Invasive Interventional TherapySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Yuan‐hong Gao
- Department of Radiation OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Jian Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor DiseasesThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated HospitalSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Fang He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor DiseasesThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated HospitalSun Yat‐sen UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongChina
- Department of Radiation OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Méndez RJ, Ayuso JR. Diffusion-weighted MRI for Diagnosing Extramural Venous Invasion in Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Prognostic Biomarker. Radiology 2023; 308:e231661. [PMID: 37581500 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.231661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ramiro J Méndez
- From the Radiology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, C/Profesor Martín Lagos s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain (R.J.M.); and Radiology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (J.R.A.)
| | - Juan R Ayuso
- From the Radiology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, C/Profesor Martín Lagos s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain (R.J.M.); and Radiology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (J.R.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Thompson HM, Widmar M. ASO Author Reflections: Understanding the Association between Extramural Venous Invasion and Survival in Rectal Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3966. [PMID: 37133567 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13357-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah M Thompson
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Widmar
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Thompson HM, Bates DDB, Pernicka JG, Park SJ, Nourbakhsh M, Fuqua JL, Fiasconaro M, Lavery JA, Wei IH, Pappou EP, Smith JJ, Nash GM, Weiser MR, Paty PB, Garcia-Aguilar J, Widmar M. MRI Assessment of Extramural Venous Invasion Before and After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and Its Association with Disease-Free and Overall Survival. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3957-3965. [PMID: 36964328 PMCID: PMC10394736 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13225-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extramural venous invasion (EMVI) on baseline MRI is associated with poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. This study investigated the association of persistent EMVI after total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) (chemoradiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy) with survival. METHODS Baseline MRI, post-TNT MRI, and surgical pathology data from 175 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent TNT and total mesorectal excision between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed for evidence of EMVI. Two radiologists assessed EMVI status with disagreement adjudicated by a third. Pathologic EMVI status was assessed per departmental standards. Cox regression models evaluated the associations between EMVI and disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS EMVI regression on both post-TNT MRI and surgical pathology was associated with disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04-0.64) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.68). In an exploratory analysis of 35 patients with EMVI on baseline MRI, only six had EMVI on pathology compared with 18 on post-TNT MRI; these findings were not associated (p = 0.2). Longer disease-free survival was seen with regression on both modalities compared with remaining positive. Regression on pathology alone, independent of MRI EMVI status, was associated with similar improvements in survival. CONCLUSIONS Baseline EMVI is associated with poor prognosis even after TNT. EMVI regression on surgical pathology is common even with persistent EMVI on post-TNT MRI. EMVI regression on surgical pathology is associated with improved DFS, while the utility of post-TNT MRI EMVI persistence for decision-making and prognosis remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah M Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David D B Bates
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Sun Jin Park
- Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mahra Nourbakhsh
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - James L Fuqua
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Megan Fiasconaro
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica A Lavery
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Iris H Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emmanouil P Pappou
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Philip B Paty
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Widmar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Shi L, Zhang Y, Hu J, Zhou W, Hu X, Cui T, Yue NJ, Sun X, Nie K. Radiomics for the Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Observational Trial. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023; 10:634. [PMID: 37370565 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10060634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: An increasing amount of research has supported the role of radiomics for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment (nCRT) in order to provide better management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. However, the lack of validation from prospective trials has hindered the clinical adoption of such studies. The purpose of this study is to validate a radiomics model for pCR assessment in a prospective trial to provide informative insight into radiomics validation. (2) Methods: This study involved a retrospective cohort of 147 consecutive patients for the development/validation of a radiomics model, and a prospective cohort of 77 patients from two institutions to test its generalization. The model was constructed using T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to understand the associations with pCR. The consistency of physicians' evaluations and agreement on pathological complete response prediction were also evaluated, with and without the aid of the radiomics model. (3) Results: The radiomics model outperformed both physicians' visual assessments in the prospective test cohort, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% confidence interval of 0.70-0.94). With the aid of the radiomics model, a junior physician could achieve comparable performance as a senior oncologist. (4) Conclusion: We have built and validated a radiomics model with pretreatment MRI for pCR prediction of LARC patients undergoing nCRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liming Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310019, China
| | - Yang Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany St., New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| | - Jiamiao Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310019, China
| | - Weiwen Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310019, China
| | - Xi Hu
- Department of Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310019, China
| | - Taoran Cui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany St., New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| | - Ning J Yue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany St., New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| | - Xiaonan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310019, China
| | - Ke Nie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers-Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany St., New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Seo N, Lim JS. [Interpretation of Rectal MRI after Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients with Rectal Cancer]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY 2023; 84:550-564. [PMID: 37325000 PMCID: PMC10265231 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2023.0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
MRI is currently the imaging modality of choice to evaluate rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment. The purposes of restaging MRI are to assess the resectability of rectal cancer and to decide whether organ preservation strategies can be applied in patients with a complete clinical response. This review article indicates the key MRI features needed to evaluate rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment using a systematic approach. Assessment of primary tumor response including MRI findings to predict a complete response is discussed. Additionally, MRI evaluation of the relationship between the primary tumor and adjacent structures, lymph node response, extramural venous invasion, and tumor deposits after neoadjuvant treatment is presented. Knowledge of these imaging features and their clinical relevance may help radiologists provide an accurate and clinically valuable interpretation of restaging rectal MRI.
Collapse
|
26
|
Tian L, Li N, Xie D, Li Q, Zhou C, Zhang S, Liu L, Huang C, Liu L, Lai S, Wang Z. Extramural vascular invasion nomogram before radical resection of rectal cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging. Front Oncol 2023; 12:1006377. [PMID: 36968215 PMCID: PMC10034136 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1006377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PurposeThis study verified the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to construct a nomogram to preoperatively predict extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) in rectal cancer using MRI characteristics.Materials and methodsThere were 55 rectal cancer patients with EMVI and 49 without EMVI in the internal training group. The external validation group consisted of 54 rectal cancer patients with EMVI and 55 without EMVI. High-resolution rectal T2WI, pelvic diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences, and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) were used. We collected the following data: distance between the lower tumor margin and the anal margin, distance between the lower tumor margin and the anorectal ring, tumor proportion of intestinal wall, mrT stage, maximum tumor diameter, circumferential resection margin, superior rectal vein width, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), T2WI EMVI score, DWI and DCE-MRI EMVI scores, demographic information, and preoperative serum tumor marker data. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors of EMVI. A nomogram prediction model was constructed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis verified the predictive ability of the nomogram. P < 0.05 was considered significant.ResultTumor proportion of intestinal wall, superior rectal vein width, T2WI EMVI score, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 were significant independent predictors of EMVI in rectal cancer and were used to create the model. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivities, and specificities of the nomogram were 0.746, 65.45%, and 83.67% for the internal training group, respectively, and 0.780, 77.1%, and 71.3% for the external validation group, respectively.Data conclusionA nomogram including MRI characteristics can predict EMVI in rectal cancer preoperatively and provides a valuable reference to formulate individualized treatment plans and predict prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianfen Tian
- Department of Radiology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Ningqin Li
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Dong Xie
- Department of Radiology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Radiology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Chuanji Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Shilai Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Lijuan Liu
- Department of Radiology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Caiyun Huang
- Department of Radiology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Lu Liu
- Department of Radiology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Shaolu Lai
- Department of Radiology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
- *Correspondence: Zheng Wang, ; Shaolu Lai,
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Radiology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
- *Correspondence: Zheng Wang, ; Shaolu Lai,
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Li ZF, Kang LQ, Liu FH, Zhao M, Guo SY, Lu S, Quan S. Radiomics based on preoperative rectal cancer MRI to predict the metachronous liver metastasis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:833-843. [PMID: 36529807 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03773-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE At present, there are few effective method to predict metachronous liver metastasis (MLM) from rectal cancer. We aim to investigate the efficacy of radiomics based on multiparametric MRI of first diagnosed rectal cancer in predicting MLM from rectal cancer. METHODS From 301 consecutive histopathologically confirmed rectal cancer patients, 130 patients who have no distant metastasis detected at the time of diagnosis were enrolled and divided into MLM group (n = 49) and non-MLM group (n = 81) according to whether liver metastasis be detected later than 6 month after the first diagnosis of rectal cancer within 3 years' follow-up. The 130 patients were divided into a training set (n = 91) and a testing set (n = 39) at a ratio of 7:3 by stratified sampling using SPSS 24.0 software. The DWI model, HD T2WI model, and DWI + HD T2WI model were constructed respectively. The best performing model was selected and combined with the screened clinical features (including non-radiomics MRI features) to construct a fusion model. The testing set was used to evaluate the performance of the models, and the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) was calculated for both the training set and the testing set. RESULTS The AUC of the DWI + HD T2WI model in the testing set was higher than that of the DWI or the HD T2 model alone with statistically significance (P < 0.05). The screened clinical features were extramural vascular invasion (EMVI), T and N stages in MRI (mrT, mrN), and the distance from the lower edge of the tumor to the anal verge. The AUC of the fusion model in the testing set was 0.911. Decision curves and nomogram also showed that the fusion model had excellent clinical performance. CONCLUSION The fusion model of primary rectal cancer MRI based radiomics combing clinical features can effectively predict MLM from rectal cancer, which may assist clinicians in formulating individualized monitoring and treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuo-Fu Li
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cangzhou Central Hospital, No. 16 Xinhua Western Road, Yunhe District, Cangzhou, 061000, China
| | - Li-Qing Kang
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cangzhou Central Hospital, No. 16 Xinhua Western Road, Yunhe District, Cangzhou, 061000, China.
| | - Feng-Hai Liu
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cangzhou Central Hospital, No. 16 Xinhua Western Road, Yunhe District, Cangzhou, 061000, China
| | - Meng Zhao
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cangzhou Central Hospital, No. 16 Xinhua Western Road, Yunhe District, Cangzhou, 061000, China
| | - Su-Yin Guo
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cangzhou Central Hospital, No. 16 Xinhua Western Road, Yunhe District, Cangzhou, 061000, China
| | - Shan Lu
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cangzhou Central Hospital, No. 16 Xinhua Western Road, Yunhe District, Cangzhou, 061000, China
| | - Shuai Quan
- GE HealthCare China (Shanghai), Shanghai, 210000, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Horvat N, El Homsi M, Miranda J, Mazaheri Y, Gollub MJ, Paroder V. Rectal MRI Interpretation After Neoadjuvant Therapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 57:353-369. [PMID: 36073323 PMCID: PMC9851947 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, several key advances in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer have been made, including the implementation of total mesorectal excision as the standard surgical approach; use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in selected patients with a high risk of local recurrence, and finally, adoption of organ preservation strategies, through either local excision or nonoperative management in selected patients with clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This review aims to shed light on the role of rectal MRI in the assessment of treatment response after neoadjuvant therapy, which is especially important given the growing feasibility of nonoperative management. First, an overview of current neoadjuvant therapies and response assessment based on digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and MRI will be provided. Second, the use of a high-quality restaging rectal MRI protocol will be presented. Third, a step-by-step approach to assessing treatment response on restaging rectal MRI following neoadjuvant treatment will be outlined, acknowledging challenges faced by radiologists during MRI interpretation. Finally, research related to response assessment will be discussed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria El Homsi
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joao Miranda
- Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Yousef Mazaheri
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc J. Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Whole-tumor amide proton transfer-weighted imaging histogram analysis to predict pathological extramural venous invasion in rectal adenocarcinoma: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol 2023:10.1007/s00330-023-09418-1. [PMID: 36700956 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09418-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw)-derived whole-tumor histogram analysis parameters in predicting pathological extramural venous invasion (pEMVI) positive status of rectal adenocarcinoma (RA). METHODS Preoperative MR including APTw imaging of 125 patients with RA (mean 61.4 ± 11.6 years) were retrospectively analyzed. Two radiologists reviewed each case's EMVI status based on the MR-based modified 5-point scale system with conventional MR images. The APTw histogram parameters of primary tumors were obtained automatically using whole-tumor volume histogram analysis. The independent risk factors markedly correlated with pEMVI-positive status were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Diagnosis performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. The AUCs were compared using the Delong method. RESULTS Univariate analysis demonstrated that MR-tumor (T) stage, MR-lymph node (N) stage, APTw-10%, APTw-90%, interquartile range, APTw-minimum, APTw-maximum, APTw-mean, APTw-median, entropy, kurtosis, mean absolute deviation (MAD), and robust MAD were significantly related to pEMVI-positive status (all p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that MR-T stage (OR = 4.864, p = 0.018), MR-N stage (OR = 4.967, p = 0.029), interquartile range (OR = 0.892, p = 0.037), APT-minimum (OR = 1.046, p = 0.031), entropy (OR = 11.604, p = 0.006), and kurtosis (OR = 1.505, p = 0.007) were the independent risk factors enabling prediction of pEMVI-positive status. The AUCs for diagnostic ability of conventional MRI assessment, the APTw histogram model, and the combined model (including APTw histogram and clinical variables) were 0.785, 0.853, and 0.918, respectively. The combined model outperformed the APTw histogram model (p = 0.013) and the conventional MRI assessment (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS Whole-tumor histogram analysis of APTw images combined with clinical factors showed better diagnosis efficiency in predicting EMVI involvement in RA. KEY POINTS • Rectal adenocarcinomas with pEMVI-positive status are typically associated with higher APTw-SI values. • APTw-minimum, interquartile range, entropy, kurtosis, MR-T stage, and MR-N stage are the independent risk factors for EMVI involvement. • The best prediction for EMVI involvement was obtained with a combined model of APTw histogram and clinical variables (area under the curve, 0.918).
Collapse
|
30
|
Bogveradze N, Snaebjornsson P, Grotenhuis BA, van Triest B, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ. MRI anatomy of the rectum: key concepts important for rectal cancer staging and treatment planning. Insights Imaging 2023; 14:13. [PMID: 36652149 PMCID: PMC9849549 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01348-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
A good understanding of the MRI anatomy of the rectum and its surroundings is pivotal to ensure high-quality diagnostic evaluation and reporting of rectal cancer. With this pictorial review, we aim to provide an image-based overview of key anatomical concepts essential for treatment planning, response evaluation and post-operative assessment. These concepts include the cross-sectional anatomy of the rectal wall in relation to T-staging; differences in staging and treatment between anal and rectal cancer; landmarks used to define the upper and lower boundaries of the rectum; the anatomy of the pelvic floor and anal canal, the mesorectal fascia, peritoneum and peritoneal reflection; and guides to help discern different pelvic lymph node stations on MRI to properly stage regional and non-regional rectal lymph node metastases. Finally, this review will highlight key aspects of post-treatment anatomy, including the assessment of radiation-induced changes and the evaluation of the post-operative pelvis after different surgical resection and reconstruction techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nino Bogveradze
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.5012.60000 0001 0481 6099GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands ,Department of Radiology, American Hospital Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brechtje A. Grotenhuis
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Baukelien van Triest
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J. Lahaye
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L. Beets
- grid.5012.60000 0001 0481 6099GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands ,grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G. H. Beets-Tan
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.5012.60000 0001 0481 6099GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands ,grid.10825.3e0000 0001 0728 0170Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Doenja M. J. Lambregts
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Peparini N. Oncological outcome after lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for low rectal carcinoma: not only an N-status matter. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:54-58. [PMID: 36190012 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Tumour deposits (TDs), novel pathological entities, should be considered when estimating the regional and systemic spread of rectal carcinoma and formulating treatment strategies. In fact, TDs may have more severe prognostic impact than lymph node positivity or the lymph node ratio. The assessment of the presence of TDs can be performed only through accurate postoperative pathological examination; however, the detection of TDs is not part of any of the procedures currently used to assess preoperative or intraoperative staging. This review aims to analyse and discuss the impact of TDs on the oncological outcome of patients who undergo surgery for advanced low rectal carcinoma. No prospective study has evaluated the impact of lateral pelvic TDs on oncological outcomes following total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Although adequate total mesorectal excision allows for the excision of intramesorectal TDs, lateral pelvic lymph node dissection cannot guarantee the removal of lateral pelvic TDs; moreover, it remains to be determined whether surgical excision of lateral pelvic TDs can impact long-term outcomes. However, the identification of lateral pelvic TDs strengthens the 'staging effect' and limits the 'therapeutic effect' of lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, supporting the rationale for the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. When evaluating the oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, the impact of lateral pelvic TDs should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Peparini
- Distretto 3, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 6, Ciampino (Rome), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
van den Berg K, Schaap DP, Voogt ELK, Buffart TE, Verheul HMW, de Groot JWB, Verhoef C, Melenhorst J, Roodhart JML, de Wilt JHW, van Westreenen HL, Aalbers AGJ, van 't Veer M, Marijnen CAM, Vincent J, Simkens LHJ, Peters NAJB, Berbée M, Werter IM, Snaebjornsson P, Peulen HMU, van Lijnschoten IG, Roef MJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Bloemen JG, Willems JMWE, Creemers GJM, Nederend J, Rutten HJT, Burger JWA. Neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI prior to chemoradiotherapy for high-risk ("ugly") locally advanced rectal cancer: study protocol of a single-arm, multicentre, open-label, phase II trial (MEND-IT). BMC Cancer 2022; 22:957. [PMID: 36068495 PMCID: PMC9446695 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09947-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The presence of mesorectal fascia (MRF) invasion, grade 4 extramural venous invasion (EMVI), tumour deposits (TD) or extensive or bilateral extramesorectal (lateral) lymph nodes (LLN) on MRI has been suggested to identify patients with indisputable, extensive locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), at high risk of treatment failure. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether or not intensified chemotherapy prior to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves the complete response (CR) rate in these patients. Methods This multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial will include 128 patients with non-metastatic high-risk LARC (hr-LARC), fit for triplet chemotherapy. To ensure a study population with indisputable, unfavourable prognostic characteristics, hr-LARC is defined as LARC with on baseline MRI at least one of the following characteristics; MRF invasion, EMVI grade 4, enlarged bilateral or extensive LLN at high risk of an incomplete resection, or TD. Exclusion criteria are the presence of a homozygous DPD deficiency, distant metastases, any chemotherapy within the past 6 months, previous radiotherapy within the pelvic area precluding standard chemoradiotherapy, and any contraindication for the planned treatment. All patients will be planned for six two-weekly cycles of FOLFOXIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) prior to chemoradiotherapy (25 × 2 Gy or 28 × 1.8 Gy with concomitant capecitabine). A resection will be performed following radiological confirmation of resectable disease after the completion of chemoradiotherapy. A watch and wait strategy is allowed in case of a clinical complete response. The primary endpoint is the CR rate, described as a pathological CR or a sustained clinical CR one year after chemoradiotherapy. The main secondary objectives are long-term oncological outcomes, radiological and pathological response, the number of resections with clear margins, treatment-related toxicity, perioperative complications, health-related costs, and quality of life. Discussion This trial protocol describes the MEND-IT study. The MEND-IT study aims to evaluate the CR rate after intensified chemotherapy prior to concomitant chemoradiotherapy in a homogeneous group of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and indisputably unfavourable characteristics, defined as hr-LARC, in order to improve their prognosis. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04838496, registered on 02–04-2021 Netherlands Trial Register: NL9790. Protocol version Version 3 dd 11–4-2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K van den Berg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - D P Schaap
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - E L K Voogt
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - T E Buffart
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J W B de Groot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Isala Oncology Centre, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Melenhorst
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J M L Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - A G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M van 't Veer
- Department of Research and Education, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - C A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J Vincent
- Department of Medical Oncology, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, the Netherlands
| | - L H J Simkens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - N A J B Peters
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Jans Hospital, Weert, the Netherlands
| | - M Berbée
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - I M Werter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - P Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H M U Peulen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - I G van Lijnschoten
- Department of Pathology, PAMM Laboratory for Pathology and Medical Microbiology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M J Roef
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - J G Bloemen
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - J M W E Willems
- Department of Medical Oncology, Anna Hospital, Geldrop, the Netherlands
| | - G J M Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - J Nederend
- Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - H J T Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Massucco P, Fontana AP, Balbo Mussetto A, Desana B, Ricotti A, Gonella F, Mineccia M, Cirillo S, Ferrero A. MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) as the best predictive factor to identify candidates to total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2022; 125:1024-1031. [PMID: 35165905 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is shifting from an adjuvant setting to a total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategy, that relies on distant metastases (DM) risk prediction. This study aims to assess the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) as predictive factor for DM in LARC, compared with other MRI-detected and pathologic factors. METHODS This retrospective single-center study analyzed data extracted from a series of consecutive patients curatively resected for rectal cancer at Mauriziano Hospital in Turin (Italy) from January 2013 to December 2018. RESULTS Data from 69 patients were analyzed. MrEMVI was detected in 31 (44.9%) cases. Median follow-up was 39.9 months. DM and local recurrence occurred in 19 (27.5%) and 4 (5.8%) patients. One- and 3-year cumulative incidence of DM were 32.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.49) and 56.8% (95% CI: 0.35-0.74) in the mrEMVI-positive group and 5.4% (95% CI: 0.01-0.16) and 14.0% (95% CI: 0.05-0.27) in the mrEMVI-negative group (log-rank test, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis of MRI factors, mrEMVI was the only independent predictor of DM (HR: 3.59, CI: 1.21-10.69, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS This study confirmed that mrEMVI is a powerful predictor of DM in LARC. It should be routinely reported and considered during multidisciplinary care strategy planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Massucco
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea P Fontana
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Ricotti
- Medical Direction of Hospital, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
- Department of Public Health and Pediatric, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Federica Gonella
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Michela Mineccia
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Johnson D, Li L, Lee KC, Lam KO, Wong KH, Ho WM, Ma B. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for High Risk Rectal Cancer in Western and Asian Populations – Current Evidence and Clinical Applications. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 21:45-54. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|