Predictors of early polymetastatic relapse following stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for up to 5 oligometastases: a secondary analysis of the phase II SABR-5 trial

Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Infradiaphragmatic Oligometastatic Disease: Disrupting the One-Size-Fits-All Paradigm

PURPOSE

Although recent studies have demonstrated the benefits of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in the treatment of oligometastatic (OM) disease, toxicity remains a concern in the infradiaphragmatic region. This is largely because of challenges in soft tissue visualization, motion management, and the proximity of gastrointestinal organs at risk. Stereotactic magnetic resonance guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) may enhance the safety and efficacy of SABR in abdominopelvic targets.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with infradiaphragmatic OM disease, including up to 5 lesions treated with SMART between May 2018 and September 2023, were evaluated. Progression-free survival, overall survival, and local control (LC) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Fine and Gray proportional subhazards models, whereas treatment-related toxicities were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 criteria.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-three targets in 138 patients with primarily lung, colorectal, and noncolorectal gastrointestinal cancers were prescribed a median dose of 50 Gy in 5 fractions on a 0.35-T magnetic resonance-Linac. Overall, 62.8% of treated metastases were within 5 mm of a dose-limiting organs at risk, necessitating online adaptive planning in 670 of 875 (76.6%) delivered SABR fractions. The 1-year progression-free survival rate was 35.8% for the entire population and significantly differed between OM and oligoprogressive patients (42.4% vs 25.4%, P = .03). There was a trend toward lower LC in colorectal versus noncolorectal histology in the definitive dose group (biologically effective dose10 ≥ 75 Gy) with 2-year LC rates of 74.0% versus 86.0%, respectively, P = .08. Acute and late grade ≥3 toxicities were 0% and 2.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SMART is feasible and effective for treating OM disease lesions in proximity to dose-limited organs at risk. Safe dose escalation is facilitated by online adaptive radiation therapy and is associated with long-term LC. Patient selection is key to identifying which patients with OM or oligoprogressive disease should be considered most appropriate for SMART.

Upfront Versus Delayed Systemic Therapy in Patients With Oligometastatic Cancer Treated With SABR in the Phase 2 SABR-5 Trial

PURPOSE

The optimal sequencing of local and systemic therapy for oligometastatic cancer has not been established. This study retrospectively compared progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and SABR-related toxicity between upfront versus delay of systemic treatment until progression in patients in the SABR-5 trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The single-arm phase 2 SABR-5 trial accrued patients with up to 5 oligometastases across SABR-5 between November 2016 and July 2020. Patients received SABR to all lesions. Two cohorts were retrospectively identified: those receiving upfront systemic treatment along with SABR and those for whom systemic treatment was delayed until disease progression. Patients treated for oligoprogression were excluded. Propensity score analysis with overlap weighting balanced baseline characteristics of cohorts. Bootstrap sampling and Cox regression models estimated the association of delayed systemic treatment with PFS, OS, and grade ≥2 toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 319 patients with oligometastases underwent treatment on SABR-5, including 121 (38%) and 198 (62%) who received upfront and delayed systemic treatment, respectively. In the weighted sample, prostate cancer was the most common primary tumor histology (48%) followed by colorectal (18%), breast (13%), and lung (4%). Most patients (93%) were treated for 1 to 2 metastases. The median follow-up time was 34 months (IQR, 24-45). Delayed systemic treatment was associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% CI, 1.15-2.13; P = .005) but similar OS (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.51-1.59; P = .65) compared with upfront systemic treatment. Risk of grade 2 or higher SABR-related toxicity was reduced with delayed systemic treatment (odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.70; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed systemic treatment is associated with shorter PFS without reduction in OS and with reduced SABR-related toxicity and may be a favorable option for select patients seeking to avoid initial systemic treatment. Efforts should continue to accrue patients to histology-specific trials examining a delayed systemic treatment approach.

Single vs. multiple fraction non-inferiority trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligo-metastases/progression: SIMPLIFY-SABR-COMET

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy delivery regimens can vary between a single fraction (SF) and multiple fractions (MF) given daily for up to several weeks depending on the location of the cancer or metastases. With limited evidence comparing fractionation regimens for oligometastases, there is support to explore toxicity levels to nearby organs at risk as a primary outcome while using SF and MF stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as well as explore differences in patient-reported quality of life and experience.

METHODS

This study will randomize 598 patients in a 1:1 ratio between the standard arm (MF SABR) and the experimental arm (SF SABR). This trial is designed as two randomized controlled trials within one patient population for resource efficiency. The primary objective of the first randomization is to determine if SF SABR is non-inferior to MF SABR, with respect to healthcare provider (HCP)-reported grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) that are related to SABR. Primary endpoint is toxicity while secondary endpoints include lesional control rate (LCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). The second randomization (BC Cancer sites only) will allocate participants to either complete quality of life (QoL) questionnaires only; or QoL questionnaires and a symptom-specific survey with symptom-guided HCP intervention. The primary objective of the second randomization is to determine if radiation-related symptom questionnaire-guided HCP intervention results in improved reported QoL as measured by the EuroQoL-5-dimensions-5levels (EQ-5D-5L) instrument. The primary endpoint is patient-reported QoL and secondary endpoints include: persistence/resolution of symptom reporting, QoL, intervention cost effectiveness, resource utilization, and overall survival.

DISCUSSION

This study will compare SF and MF SABR in the treatment of oligometastases and oligoprogression to determine if there is non-inferior toxicity for SF SABR in selected participants with 1-5 oligometastatic lesions. This study will also compare patient-reported QoL between participants who receive radiation-related symptom-guided HCP intervention and those who complete questionnaires alone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05784428. Date of Registration: 23 March 2023.

Predicting long‑term survival following involved site radiotherapy for oligometastases

The majority of cancer-associated mortalities are due to distant metastases, and systemic therapy alone is generally not curative. Patients with oligometastases are amenable to involved site radiotherapy with the possibility of long-term disease-free survival; however, prognostic factors remain poorly defined. The present retrospective, single institution study consisted of consecutive adult patients with oligometastases from solid tumor malignancy referred to a single high volume radiation oncologist between January 2014 and December 2021. Oligometastases were defined as ≤5 extracranial or intracranial metastatic lesions where all sites of active disease are treatable, including patients requiring treatment of the primary tumor and/or regional lymph nodes. The study population consisted of 130 patients with 207 treated distant metastases. Radical radiotherapy was administered to all areas of known residual disease and included stereotactic radiotherapy (median dose, 27 Gy in 3 fractions) or intensity modulated radiotherapy (median dose, 50 Gy in 15 fractions). At a median follow-up of 28.8 months, the median overall survival was 37.9 months with a 4-year overall survival of 41.1%. The median progression-free survival was 12.3 months and the 4-year progression-free survival was 22.6%. On multivariate an1alysis, the strongest predictors of overall survival were age, ECOG performance status, primary prostate, breast or kidney tumor and pre-radiation serum albumin (P≤0.01 for all). Overall, the present study demonstrated that long-term overall survival was possible after radical treatment for oligometastases and identified potential prognostic factors.

Should organs at risk (OARs) be prioritized over target volume coverage in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases? a secondary analysis of the population-based phase II SABR-5 trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases may improve survival, however concerns about safety remain. To mitigate risk of toxicity, target coverage was sacrificed to prioritize organs-at-risk (OARs) during SABR planning in the population-based SABR-5 trial. This study evaluated the effect of this practice on dosimetry, local recurrence (LR), and progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS

This single-arm phase II trial included patients with up to 5 oligometastases between November 2016 and July 2020. Theprotocol-specified planning objective was to cover 95 % of the planning target volume (PTV) with 100 % of the prescribed dose, however PTV coverage was reduced as needed to meet OAR constraints. This trade-off was measured using the coverage compromise index (CCI), computed as minimum dose received by the hottest 99 % of the PTV (D99) divided by the prescription dose. Under-coverage was defined as CCI < 0.90. The potential association between CCI and outcomes was evaluated.

RESULTS

549 lesions from 381 patients were assessed. Mean CCI was 0.88 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.89), and 196 (36 %) lesions were under-covered. The highest mean CCI (0.95; 95 %CI, 0.93-0.97) was in non-spine bone lesions (n = 116), while the lowest mean CCI (0.71; 95 % CI, 0.69-0.73) was in spine lesions (n = 104). On multivariable analysis, under-coverage did not predict for worse LR (HR 0.48, p = 0.37) or PFS (HR 1.24, p = 0.38). Largest lesion diameter, colorectal and 'other' (non-prostate, breast, or lung) primary predicted for worse LR. Largest lesion diameter, synchronous tumor treatment, short disease free interval, state of oligoprogression, initiation or change in systemic treatment, and a high PTV Dmax were significantly associated with PFS.

CONCLUSION

PTV under-coverage was not associated with worse LR or PFS in this large, population-based phase II trial. Combined with low toxicity rates, this study supports the practice of prioritizing OAR constraints during oligometastatic SABR planning.