A Meta-Analysis of Trials of Partial Breast Irradiation

Implications of omitting sentinel lymph node biopsy on adjuvant decision making for patients with small breast cancers

BACKGROUND

Selective omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with early breast cancer limits surgical morbidity. Adoption of this strategy relies on multidisciplinary consensus. Understanding how SLNB omission influences guideline-based adjuvant treatment decisions, and the proportion of patients impacted, can help guide decision-making.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from the National Cancer Database (2018-2020) was used to estimate the proportions of patients with cT1N0 hormone receptor-positive breast cancer for whom adjuvant chemotherapy, CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy, and regional nodal irradiation decisions would be impacted by the absence of lymph node pathology if national treatment guidelines were followed. Because OncotypeDX score is essential to adjuvant decision-making when SLNB is omitted, inverse probability weighting was used to estimate the proportions of interest had all individuals undergone OncotypeDX testing.

RESULTS

There were 119,312 included patients, with an average age of 63 years, 96,454 (80.8%) having invasive ductal histology, and 52,222 (43.8%) having cT1c tumors. The number of patients with SLNB positivity was 13,211 (11.1%). Among postmenopausal women, 7.9% (95% CI, 7.7-8.1) would have had at least one adjuvant decision impacted by the absence of lymph node pathology. For premenopausal women, the affected proportion was 13.7% (95% CI, 13.0-14.7). When ribociclib decision-making was not considered, these estimates were 2.5% for postmenopausal women and 12.6% for premenopausal women.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB omission has a small - but not negligible - influence on adjuvant decision making in postmenopausal women, whereas a larger proportion of premenopausal women would be impacted. The reported estimates may inform multidisciplinary decision-making related to SLNB omission.

Radiation-induced heart disease in breast cancer patients: a narrative review of epidemiology, risk factors, radiotherapy parameters, and prevention

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women worldwide; nevertheless, the prognosis is good, with a 5-year overall survival of 80-90%. Therefore, it becomes crucial to strive for high quality of life after cure by minimizing treatment-related toxicity. One such concern is radiation-induced heart disease, which remains a significant focus of ongoing investigations.

PURPOSE

The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge on radiation-induced heart disease in breast cancer patients by giving an overview of its epidemiology, risk factors, radiation parameters related to its development, solutions in radiation practice, and prevention. The goal is to raise awareness and maximize prevention of radiation-induced heart disease.

METHODS

The PubMed database was screened for articles published between January 2013 and November 2023 related to the keywords , , , and . Moreover, by screening the literature lists of these publications, additional articles were added.

RESULTS

Ninety-four relevant papers remained for final review.

CONCLUSION

Radiation-induced heart disease is a rare complication after breast cancer radiotherapy and represents a clinical spectrum of various cardiovascular conditions. Several heart-sparing techniques have been developed, and more attention has been paid to early diagnosis and prevention of radiation-induced heart disease. However, further research remains important to refine radiotherapy techniques and deepen our understanding for improved prevention and treatment of this condition in the future. This clinical review summarizes the existing evidence and literature on radiation-induced heart disease following modern breast cancer radiotherapy, offering clinical guidance for physicians.

Stabilised hyaluronic acid gel marker versus surgical clips for tumour bed delineation in breast cancer radiotherapy using MRI-simulation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Compare breast cancer tumour bed (TB) delineation using stabilised hyaluronic acid (sHA) gel and MRI-simulation versus surgical clips and CT-simulation within same patient cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective single arm study of patients undergoing breast conserving surgery. Patients had both clips (≥5) and sHA gel markers inserted to define the TB and underwent MRI and CT simulation scans. Six observers delineated the TB aided by gel on MRI, and clips on CT. The primary measure was the inter-observer variability (inter-OV) of the delineated TB using the overlap difference of using clips and CT versus sHA gel and MRI, measured according to the general definition of the conformity index (CIgen).

RESULTS

Of 35 patients recruited, 30 underwent inter-OV analysis of contours and 5 required further breast surgery for positive margins. There was no significant difference in mean CIgen between TB delineated using gel and MRI versus clips and CT (0.463 vs 0.434, p = 0.235). Observers reported higher usefulness of gel in patients who underwent oncoplastic surgery (median utility score 8.2 vs 6.6, p = 0.024), and higher visibility of gel in patients who had their scans within 6 weeks than beyond post-op (median visibility score 8.1 vs 6.1, p = 0.013). When the cavity visualisation score was higher (4-5), the median utility score of gel was lower (5.54 vs 8.0, p < 0.001), and the mean CIgen of clips and CT delineated TB was higher (0.64 vs 0.37, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

sHA gel has similar inter-OV of TB delineation compared to ≥5 clips, hence is a reliable alternative to clips when MRI-simulation is used.

Navigating through recent evidence on locoregional breast cancer radiotherapy: an initiative by the scientific association of Swiss radiation oncology

PURPOSE

Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer in women and radiotherapy (RT) is an integral part of its treatment. High-level evidence guides clinical decisions, but given the abundance of guidelines, a need to navigate within the evidence has been identified by the board of the Scientific Association of Swiss Radiation Oncology (SASRO). A pilot project was initiated aiming to create an overview of recent clinically relevant evidence for BC RT, to make it easily available to (radiation) oncologists and radiation oncologists in training.

METHODS

A panel of 10 radiation oncology experts for BC RT, one expert in BC surgery, and one expert in BC medical oncology critically reviewed the relevant literature. The panel comprehensively represented different geographical regions of Switzerland as well as university, cantonal, and private institutions. We sought to create a consensual overview of the most relevant questions in BC RT today, accompanied by the most recent and relevant available evidence.

RESULTS

From January 2023 to January 2024, the panel met four times to review and work on an initial draft. The final draft was reviewed and accepted by all panelists. We hereby publish this work to make it available to international audiences. After publication, the work will be made available to all SASRO members on the SASRO website. This work is to be updated every 2 years.

CONCLUSION

The identified need was addressed with a successful pilot project and will be further expanded upon in other tumor pathologies.

Comparative long-term oncological outcomes of intraoperative radiotherapy vs. whole-breast irradiation in early breast cancer: a single institute study

Background

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) and whole breast irradiation (WBI) are both effective adjuvant radiotherapy methods for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or early-stage breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS). We aim to evaluate the long-term oncological efficacy and refine patient selection criteria based on our findings.

Methods

Female patients who underwent either IORT or WBI from January 2016 to December 2019, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were collected. IORT was administered as a single fraction of 20 Gray (Gy) to the lumpectomy cavity using the Axxent electronic brachytherapy system, while WBI consisted of a standard fractionation of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, along with a reduced boost of 10 Gy. The clinicopathologic characteristics and oncological outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

A total of 247 patients were enrolled, comprising 164 with BC and 83 with DCIS. Among them, 112 underwent IORT, and 135 received WBI after BCS. The median age was 62.2 years, with median tumor sizes of 1.5 cm for BC and 1.2 cm for DCIS. At a median follow-up of 64.6 months, IORT demonstrated 11 locoregional recurrences (LRR), 1 metastasis, and 1 death, compared to 4 LRR, 5 metastases, and 2 deaths in the WBI group. WBI yielded significantly higher locoregional control (97.0% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.033), although metastasis-free (96.3% vs. 99.1%, p = 0.166) and overall survival rates (98.4% vs. 99%, p = 0.688) did not differ. The LRR rate was significantly higher in the IORT group among the DCIS or BC patients (p = 0.043). The hazard ratio for locoregional recurrence significantly increased in estrogen-receptor-negative (ER-) patients in both univariate analysis (HR = 4.98, 95% CI = 1.76-14.09, p = 0.002) and multivariate analysis (HR = 40.88, 95% CI = 1.29-1297.84, p = 0.035). Additionally, IORT was associated with increased LRR in the multivariate analysis (HR = 4.71, 95% CI = 1.16-19.06, p = 0.030).

Conclusion

At a long-term follow-up, the LRR rate was higher in the BCS followed by IORT, without significant differences in metastasis-free or overall survival rates. Our data confirmed the importance of exclusion ER- patients for IORT.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of intraoperative electron radiation therapy delivered with a dedicated mobile linac for partial breast irradiation in early breast cancer

• PBI is valid alternative to WBI in patients at low-risk of local relapse. • PBI is delivered by means of various techniques, one of which is IOeRT. • After IOeRT, an unexpectedly high LR rate was observed in the only phase III RCT. • Patient selection impacts on LR rates after IOeRT. • With appropriate patient selection IOeRT outcomes overlap with other RT techniques.

Preliminary report on ultrashort perioperative partial-breast irradiation with multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy for early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

Perioperative partial-breast irradiation (PBI) with multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) is less invasive and more convenient than postoperative one. This study aimed to compare ultrashort perioperative MIB-PBI (uPBI) and conventional perioperative MIB-PBI (cPBI) performed during the same period of time.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria of the study were patients aged ≥ 40 years and those with T0-2 (≤ 3 cm), N0-mi, and negative margins on mammography. The locoregional recurrence (LRR) and toxicity rates were compared between uPBI at a dose of 25.2 Gy in four fractions and cPBI at a dose of 32 Gy in eight fractions.

RESULTS

In total, 198 patients (151 with uPBI and 47 with cPBI) were evaluated. At a median follow-up of 20.1 months, one (0.66%) patient in the uPBI group had LRR. The 2-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence-free survival rates of the uPBI and cPBI groups were 98.7% and 100%, respectively. The highest toxicity grades were grade 1 in 23 (15.2%) and grade 2 in 2 (1.3%) patients in the uPBI group, and grade 1 in 8 (17.0%) and grade 2 in 1 (2.1%) patient in the cPBI group. None of the patients in the two groups presented with grade 3 and higher toxicities. The toxicity rates between the two groups did not significantly differ. Further, 22 (14.6%) patients in the uPBI group and 8 (17.0%) in the cPBI group, and 3 (2.0%) patients in the uPBI group and 1 (2.1%) in the cPBI had acute and late toxicities, respectively. The timing of toxicity development between the two groups did not significantly differ.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this preliminary report included a small sample size and had a short follow-up period, the local control and toxicity rates were similar between the uPBI and cPBI groups. Further research is warranted to investigate the ideal dose schedule of MIB-PBI.

Intraoperative Radiation Therapy Delivered by Brachytherapy in Breast Cancer: An Interim Analysis of a Phase 2 Trial

PURPOSE

Intraoperative breast cancer radiotherapy (IORT) offers an alternative to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The Intraoperative brachytherapy (IOBT) trial applies high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with a new applicator prototype as IORT after BCS. In this interim analysis of the IOBT trial, we present the oncological safety and toxicity of the method METHODS: Eligible patients were women, ≥ 50 years old with an unifocal nonlobular, estrogen-receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, cN0, ≤ 3 cm, treated with BCS and sentinel node biopsy (SNB). Toxicity was registered according to the LENT-SOMA scale. Cumulative incidence of local (LR) and regional recurrence (RR) were calculated through cumulative incidence function whereas overall survival (OS) was illustrated through Kaplan-Meier curve.

RESULTS

Until February 2023, 155 women (median age 68 years) were included in the trial. Twenty-nine women (18.7%) received supplemental EBRT, mostly due to positive SNB. Three-year cumulative incidence of LR and RR were 1.0% (CI 95 % 0.1%-2.3%) and 2.1% (CI 95% 0.8%-4.2%) respectively. Five- year cumulative incidence of LR and RR were 3.9% (CI 95% 1.8%-6.4%) and 2.1% (CI 95% 0.8%-4.2%) respectively. Five-year OS was 96.3% (CI 95% 93.6%-98.4%). Side effects were limited, low grade, and transient.

CONCLUSION

Acknowledging the short median follow-up time at interim analysis, our initial results indicate that delivering IORT through HDR brachytherapy in carefully selected breast cancer patients is feasible and oncological safe so far. A long-term follow-up is essential to confirm the initial results.

Partial Breast Irradiation for Patients With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer or Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on appropriate indications and techniques for partial breast irradiation (PBI) for patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ.

METHODS

ASTRO convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on the appropriate indications and techniques for PBI as an alternative to whole breast irradiation (WBI) to result in similar rates of ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) and toxicity outcomes. Also addressed were aspects related to the technical delivery of PBI, including dose-fractionation regimens, target volumes, and treatment parameters for different PBI techniques. The guideline is based on a systematic review provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Recommendations were created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

PBI delivered using 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy, multicatheter brachytherapy, and single-entry brachytherapy results in similar IBR as WBI with long-term follow-up. Some patient characteristics and tumor features were underrepresented in the randomized controlled trials, making it difficult to fully define IBR risks for patients with these features. Appropriate dose-fractionation regimens, target volume delineation, and treatment planning parameters for delivery of PBI are outlined. Intraoperative radiation therapy alone is associated with a higher IBR rate compared with WBI. A daily or every-other-day external beam PBI regimen is preferred over twice-daily regimens due to late toxicity concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on published data, the ASTRO task force has proposed recommendations to inform best clinical practices on the use of PBI.

Comparison of adverse events in partial- or whole breast radiotherapy: investigation of cosmesis, toxicities and quality of life in a meta-analysis of randomized trials

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

Adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy and systemic therapy are part of the current evidence-based treatment protocols for early breast cancer, after breast-conserving surgery. Numerous randomized trials have investigated the therapeutic effects of partial breast irradiation (PBI) compared to whole breast irradiation (WBI), limiting the treated breast tissue. These trials were designed to achieve equal control of the disease with possible reduction in adverse events, improvements in cosmesis and quality of life (QoL). In this meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the differences between PBI and WBI in side effects and QoL.

MATERIAL/METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review searching for randomized trials comparing WBI and PBI in early-stage breast cancer with publication dates after 2009. The meta-analysis was performed using the published event rates and the effect-sizes for available acute and late adverse events. Additionally, we evaluated cosmetic outcomes as well as general and breast-specific QoL using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were identified (n = 19,085 patients). PBI was associated with a lower prevalence in any grade 1 + acute toxicity and grade 2 + skin toxicity (OR = 0.12; 95% CI 0.09-0.18; p < 0.001); (OR = 0.16; 95% CI 0.07-0.41; p < 0.001). There was neither a significant difference in late adverse events between the two treatments, nor in any unfavorable cosmetic outcomes, rated by either medical professionals or patients. PBI-technique using EBRT with twice-daily fractionation schedules resulted in worse cosmesis rated by patients (n = 3215; OR = 2.08; 95% CI 1.22-3.54; p = 0.007) compared to WBI. Maximum once-daily EBRT schedules (n = 2071; OR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.45-0.79; p < 0.001) and IORT (p = 0.042) resulted in better cosmetic results grade by medical professionals. Functional- and symptom-based QoL in the C30-scale was not different between PBI and WBI. Breast-specific QoL was superior after PBI in the subdomains of "systemic therapy side effects" as well as "breast-" and "arm symptoms".

CONCLUSION

The analysis of multiple randomized trials demonstrate a superiority of PBI in acute toxicity as well breast-specific quality of life, when compared with WBI. Overall, late toxicities and cosmetic results were similar. PBI-technique with a fractionation of twice-daily schedules resulted in worse cosmesis rated by patients.

Real de-escalation or escalation in disguise?

The past two decades have seen an unprecedented trend towards de-escalation of surgical therapy in the setting of early BC, the most prominent examples being the reduction of re-excision rates for close surgical margins after breast-conserving surgery and replacing axillary lymph node dissection by less radical procedures such as sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Numerous studies confirmed that reducing the extent of surgery in the upfront surgery setting does not impact locoregional recurrences and overall outcome. In the setting of primary systemic treatment, there is an increased use of less invasive staging strategies reaching from SLNB and targeted lymph node biopsy (TLNB) to targeted axillary dissection (TAD). Omission of any axillary surgery in the presence of pathological complete response in the breast is currently being investigated in clinical trials. On the other hand, concerns have been raised that surgical de-escalation might induce an escalation of other treatment modalities such as radiation therapy. Since most trials on surgical de-escalation did not include standardized protocols for adjuvant radiotherapy, it remains unclear, whether the effect of surgical de-escalation was valid in itself or if radiotherapy compensated for the decreased surgical extent. Uncertainties in scientific evidence may therefore lead to escalation of radiotherapy in some settings of surgical de-escalation. Further, the increasing rate of mastectomies including contralateral procedures in patients without genetic risk is alarming. Future studies of locoregional treatment strategies need to include an interdisciplinary approach to integrate de-escalation approaches combining surgery and radiotherapy in a way that promotes optimal quality of life and shared decision-making.

Recent Advances in Optimizing Radiation Therapy Decisions in Early Invasive Breast Cancer

Adjuvant whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery is a well-established treatment standard for early invasive breast cancer. Screening, early diagnosis, refinement in surgical techniques, the knowledge of new and specific molecular prognostic factors, and now the standard use of more effective neo/adjuvant systemic therapies have proven instrumental in reducing the rates of locoregional relapses. This underscores the need for reliably identifying women with such low-risk disease burdens in whom elimination of radiation from the treatment plan would not compromise oncological safety. This review summarizes the current evidence for radiation de-intensification strategies and details ongoing prospective clinical trials investigating the omission of adjuvant whole breast irradiation in molecularly defined low-risk breast cancers and related evidence supporting the potential for radiation de-escalation in HER2+ and triple-negative clinical subtypes. Furthermore, we discuss the current evidence for the de-escalation of regional nodal irradiation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Finally, we also detail the current knowledge of the clinical value of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and liquid-based biomarkers as prognostic factors for locoregional relapse.

Linac-Based Ultrahypofractionated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) in Low-Risk Breast Cancer: First Results of a Monoinstitutional Observational Analysis

Purpose: For adjuvant radiotherapy of low-risk breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery, there have been many trials of hypofractionation and partial breast irradiation (PBI) over the years, with proven mild long-term toxicity. The aim of this study was to introduce a short-course dose-adapted concept, proven in whole breast irradiation (WBI) for use in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), while monitoring dosimetric data and toxicity. Methods: From April 2020 to March 2022, 61 patients with low-risk breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were treated at a single institution with percutaneous APBI of 26 Gy in five fractions every other day after breast-conserving surgery. Dosimetric data for target volume and organs at risk were determined retrospectively. Acute toxicity was evaluated. Results: The target volume of radiotherapy comprised an average of 19% of the ipsilateral mamma. The burden on the heart and lungs was very low. The mean cardiac dose during irradiation of the left breast was only 0.6 Gy. Two out of three patients remained without any acute side effects. Conclusions: Linac-based APBI is an attractive treatment option for patients with low-risk breast cancer in whom neither WBI nor complete omission of radiotherapy appears to be an adequate alternative.

Whole Breast Irradiation Versus Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy for Breast Conserving Therapy: A Large Mature Single Institution Matched-Pair Evaluation of True Local Relapse, Progression Free Survival, and Overall Survival

PURPOSE

Comparative outcome data after intraoperative radiation therapy and whole breast irradiation (WBI) for breast cancer at >10 years median follow-up are rare. We present a mature, single-institution, matched-pair comparison reporting survival and relapse rates in patients treated with either modality.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Complete data sets for 258 intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) patients treated between 2000 and 2010 were matched with 258 patients postoperatively treated with WBI by age/histology/tumor size, grading/lymph-node-status/hormone receptors/type of adjuvant therapy/surgical margins, and treatment date. Relapse at surgical intervention site was classified as true local recurrence (LR). All recurrences in the treated breast (any quadrant) were classified as ipsilateral recurrence (IR).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 157 months (12-251) for the IOERT group and 154 months (31-246) for the WBI group. Cumulative incidence of IR at 5, 10, and 15 years was 2.4%, 7.9%, and 12.7% for IOERT and 1.2%, 4.1%, and 5.0% for WBI (P = .02). Cumulative incidence of LR at 5, 10, and 15 years was 1.6%, 5.1%, and 8.3% for IOERT and 0.4%, 2.1%, and 2.5% for WBI (P = .02). No differences in overall survival, disease-free survival, second cancer incidence, or cardiac events were recorded in either treatment group. Outcome was better in the accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI)-suitable group than in the APBI-unsuitable group (2009 criteria) (cumulative incidence of IR at 5, 10, and 15 years was 0% vs 7.3%, 6.1% vs 13.3%, and 7.3% vs 19.9% for IOERT and 0% vs 1.8%, 2.0% vs 3.9%, and 3.1% vs 3.9% for WBI) and in the revised APBI-suitable group than in the APBI-cautionary group (2017 criteria) (cumulative incidence of IR at 5, 10, and 15 years was 1.1% vs 6.4%, 6.2% vs 13.3%, and 7.8% vs 27.5% for IOERT and 1.7% vs 0%, 4.1% vs 4.4%, and 5.4% vs 4.4% for WBI).

CONCLUSIONS

The IR and LR rate were higher after IOERT than after WBI for the American Society for Radiation Oncology suitable patient group, although without reaching statistical significance. Thus, IOERT could be an alternative to WBI upon stringent patient selection, but patients should be counseled carefully about the potential for increased IR rate with IOERT. Second cancer incidence and cardiac events did not differ between IOERT and WBI.