1
|
Leon-Ferre RA, Jonas SF, Salgado R, Loi S, de Jong V, Carter JM, Nielsen TO, Leung S, Riaz N, Chia S, Jules-Clément G, Curigliano G, Criscitiello C, Cockenpot V, Lambertini M, Suman VJ, Linderholm B, Martens JWM, van Deurzen CHM, Timmermans AM, Shimoi T, Yazaki S, Yoshida M, Kim SB, Lee HJ, Dieci MV, Bataillon G, Vincent-Salomon A, André F, Kok M, Linn SC, Goetz MP, Michiels S. Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. JAMA 2024; 331:1135-1144. [PMID: 38563834 PMCID: PMC10988354 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.3056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Importance The association of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) abundance in breast cancer tissue with cancer recurrence and death in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who are not treated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. Objective To study the association of TIL abundance in breast cancer tissue with survival among patients with early-stage TNBC who were treated with locoregional therapy but no chemotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective pooled analysis of individual patient-level data from 13 participating centers in North America (Rochester, Minnesota; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada), Europe (Paris, Lyon, and Villejuif, France; Amsterdam and Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Milan, Padova, and Genova, Italy; Gothenburg, Sweden), and Asia (Tokyo, Japan; Seoul, Korea), including 1966 participants diagnosed with TNBC between 1979 and 2017 (with follow-up until September 27, 2021) who received treatment with surgery with or without radiotherapy but no adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Exposure TIL abundance in breast tissue from resected primary tumors. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was invasive disease-free survival [iDFS]. Secondary outcomes were recurrence-free survival [RFS], survival free of distant recurrence [distant RFS, DRFS], and overall survival. Associations were assessed using a multivariable Cox model stratified by participating center. Results This study included 1966 patients with TNBC (median age, 56 years [IQR, 39-71]; 55% had stage I TNBC). The median TIL level was 15% (IQR, 5%-40%). Four-hundred seventeen (21%) had a TIL level of 50% or more (median age, 41 years [IQR, 36-63]), and 1300 (66%) had a TIL level of less than 30% (median age, 59 years [IQR, 41-72]). Five-year DRFS for stage I TNBC was 94% (95% CI, 91%-96%) for patients with a TIL level of 50% or more, compared with 78% (95% CI, 75%-80%) for those with a TIL level of less than 30%; 5-year overall survival was 95% (95% CI, 92%-97%) for patients with a TIL level of 50% or more, compared with 82% (95% CI, 79%-84%) for those with a TIL level of less than 30%. At a median follow-up of 18 years, and after adjusting for age, tumor size, nodal status, histological grade, and receipt of radiotherapy, each 10% higher TIL increment was associated independently with improved iDFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [0.89-0.94]), RFS (HR, 0.90 [0.87-0.92]), DRFS (HR, 0.87 [0.84-0.90]), and overall survival (0.88 [0.85-0.91]) (likelihood ratio test, P < 10e-6). Conclusions and Relevance In patients with early-stage TNBC who did not undergo adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast cancer tissue with a higher abundance of TIL levels was associated with significantly better survival. These results suggest that breast tissue TIL abundance is a prognostic factor for patients with early-stage TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah Flora Jonas
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Roberto Salgado
- GZA-ZNA-Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vincent de Jong
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jodi M. Carter
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Samuel Leung
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nazia Riaz
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stephen Chia
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gérôme Jules-Clément
- Bioinformatics Core Facility, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm US23, CNRS UMS 3655, Villejuif, France
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Vera J. Suman
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Barbro Linderholm
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, and Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | - Shu Yazaki
- National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Sung-Bae Kim
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Jin Lee
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV—IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | | | | | - Fabrice André
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Marleen Kok
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine C. Linn
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pozner A, Li L, Verma SP, Wang S, Barrott JJ, Nelson ML, Yu JSE, Negri GL, Colborne S, Hughes CS, Zhu JF, Lambert SL, Carroll LS, Smith-Fry K, Stewart MG, Kannan S, Jensen B, John CM, Sikdar S, Liu H, Dang NH, Bourdage J, Li J, Vahrenkamp JM, Mortenson KL, Groundland JS, Wustrack R, Senger DL, Zemp FJ, Mahoney DJ, Gertz J, Zhang X, Lazar AJ, Hirst M, Morin GB, Nielsen TO, Shen PS, Jones KB. ASPSCR1-TFE3 reprograms transcription by organizing enhancer loops around hexameric VCP/p97. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1165. [PMID: 38326311 PMCID: PMC10850509 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45280-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The t(X,17) chromosomal translocation, generating the ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion oncoprotein, is the singular genetic driver of alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) and some Xp11-rearranged renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), frustrating efforts to identify therapeutic targets for these rare cancers. Here, proteomic analysis identifies VCP/p97, an AAA+ ATPase with known segregase function, as strongly enriched in co-immunoprecipitated nuclear complexes with ASPSCR1::TFE3. We demonstrate that VCP is a likely obligate co-factor of ASPSCR1::TFE3, one of the only such fusion oncoprotein co-factors identified in cancer biology. Specifically, VCP co-distributes with ASPSCR1::TFE3 across chromatin in association with enhancers genome-wide. VCP presence, its hexameric assembly, and its enzymatic function orchestrate the oncogenic transcriptional signature of ASPSCR1::TFE3, by facilitating assembly of higher-order chromatin conformation structures demonstrated by HiChIP. Finally, ASPSCR1::TFE3 and VCP demonstrate co-dependence for cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenesis in vitro and in ASPS and RCC mouse models, underscoring VCP's potential as a novel therapeutic target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Pozner
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Li Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Shiv Prakash Verma
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Shuxin Wang
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jared J Barrott
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Mary L Nelson
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jamie S E Yu
- Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gian Luca Negri
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Shane Colborne
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Ju-Fen Zhu
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sydney L Lambert
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lara S Carroll
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kyllie Smith-Fry
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Michael G Stewart
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sarmishta Kannan
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Bodrie Jensen
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Cini M John
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Disease, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Saif Sikdar
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Disease, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Hongrui Liu
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Disease, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ngoc Ha Dang
- Department of Oncology, Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jennifer Bourdage
- Department of Oncology, Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jinxiu Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jeffery M Vahrenkamp
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Katelyn L Mortenson
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - John S Groundland
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Rosanna Wustrack
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Donna L Senger
- Department of Oncology, Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University and Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Franz J Zemp
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Douglas J Mahoney
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jason Gertz
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Xiaoyang Zhang
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Departments of Anatomic Pathology, Translational Molecular Pathology and Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Martin Hirst
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gregg B Morin
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Peter S Shen
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kevin B Jones
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kos Z, Nielsen TO, Laenkholm AV. Breast Cancer Histopathology in the Age of Molecular Oncology. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2023:a041647. [PMID: 38151327 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
For more than a century, microscopic histology has been the cornerstone for cancer diagnosis, and breast carcinoma is no exception. In recent years, clinical biomarkers, gene expression profiles, and other molecular tests have shown increasing utility for identifying the key biological features that guide prognosis and treatment of breast cancer. Indeed, the most common histologic pattern-invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type-provides relatively little guidance to management beyond triggering grading, biomarker testing, and clinical staging. However, many less common histologic patterns can be recognized by trained pathologists, which in many cases can be linked to characteristic biomarker and gene expression patterns, underlying mutations, prognosis, and therapy. Herein we describe more than a dozen such histomorphologic subtypes (including lobular, metaplastic, salivary analog, and several good prognosis special types of breast cancer) in the context of their molecular and clinical features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
- BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
- Molecular and Advanced Pathology Core, Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3Z6, Canada
| | - Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nielsen TO, Leung SCY, Riaz N, Mulligan AM, Kos Z, Bane A, Whelan TJ. Ki67 assessment protocol as an integral biomarker for avoiding radiotherapy in the LUMINA breast cancer trial. Histopathology 2023; 83:903-911. [PMID: 37609778 DOI: 10.1111/his.15032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The LUMINA trial demonstrated a very low local recurrence rate in women ≥55 years with low-risk luminal A breast cancer (defined as grade I-II, T1N0, hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative and Ki67 index ≤13.25%) treated with breast-conserving surgery and endocrine therapy (but no other systemic therapy), supporting the safe omission of radiation in these women. Here we describe the protocol for Ki67 assessment, the companion diagnostic used to guide omission of adjuvant radiotherapy. METHODS Ki67 immunohistochemistry was performed on full-face sections at one of three regional labs. Pathologists trained in the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group (IKWG) method demarcated tumour areas on scanned slides and scored 100 nuclei from each of at least five randomly selected 1-mm fields. For cases with high Ki67 heterogeneity, further virtual cores were selected and scored in order to confidently assign a case as luminal A (≤13.25%) or B (>13.25%). Interlaboratory variability was assessed through an annual quality assurance programme during the study period. RESULTS From the quality assurance programme, the mean Ki67 index across all cases/labs was 13%. The observed intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and kappa statistics were ≥0.9 and ≥0.7, respectively, indicating a substantial level of agreement. Median scoring time was 4 min per case. The IKWG-recommended scoring method, performed directly from slides, requiring up to four scored fields, is concordant with the LUMINA scoring method (ICC ≥ 0.9). CONCLUSION Ki67 is a practical, reproducible, and inexpensive biomarker that can identify low-risk luminal A breast cancers as potential candidates for radiation de-escalation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01791829.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torsten O Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Samuel C Y Leung
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nazia Riaz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anna M Mulligan
- University Health Network, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anita Bane
- University Health Network, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy J Whelan
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Benabdallah NS, Dalal V, Scott RW, Marcous F, Sotiriou A, Kommoss FKF, Pejkovska A, Gaspar L, Wagner L, Sánchez-Rivera FJ, Ta M, Thornton S, Nielsen TO, Underhill TM, Banito A. Aberrant gene activation in synovial sarcoma relies on SSX specificity and increased PRC1.1 stability. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2023; 30:1640-1652. [PMID: 37735617 PMCID: PMC10643139 DOI: 10.1038/s41594-023-01096-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
The SS18-SSX fusion drives oncogenic transformation in synovial sarcoma by bridging SS18, a member of the mSWI/SNF (BAF) complex, to Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) target genes. Here we show that the ability of SS18-SSX to occupy H2AK119ub1-rich regions is an intrinsic property of its SSX C terminus, which can be exploited by fusion to transcriptional regulators beyond SS18. Accordingly, SS18-SSX recruitment occurs in a manner that is independent of the core components and catalytic activity of BAF. Alternative SSX fusions are also recruited to H2AK119ub1-rich chromatin and reproduce the expression signatures of SS18-SSX by engaging with transcriptional activators. Variant Polycomb repressive complex 1.1 (PRC1.1) acts as the main depositor of H2AK119ub1 and is therefore required for SS18-SSX occupancy. Importantly, the SSX C terminus not only depends on H2AK119ub1 for localization, but also further increases it by promoting PRC1.1 complex stability. Consequently, high H2AK119ub1 levels are a feature of murine and human synovial sarcomas. These results uncover a critical role for SSX-C in mediating gene deregulation in synovial sarcoma by providing specificity to chromatin and further enabling oncofusion binding by enhancing PRC1.1 stability and H2AK119ub1 deposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nezha S Benabdallah
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma Research Group, Hopp Children's Cancer Center, Heidelberg (KiTZ), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vineet Dalal
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma Research Group, Hopp Children's Cancer Center, Heidelberg (KiTZ), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Wilder Scott
- Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Fady Marcous
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma Research Group, Hopp Children's Cancer Center, Heidelberg (KiTZ), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Afroditi Sotiriou
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma Research Group, Hopp Children's Cancer Center, Heidelberg (KiTZ), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix K F Kommoss
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma Research Group, Hopp Children's Cancer Center, Heidelberg (KiTZ), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anastasija Pejkovska
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma Research Group, Hopp Children's Cancer Center, Heidelberg (KiTZ), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ludmila Gaspar
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma Research Group, Hopp Children's Cancer Center, Heidelberg (KiTZ), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lena Wagner
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma Research Group, Hopp Children's Cancer Center, Heidelberg (KiTZ), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Francisco J Sánchez-Rivera
- Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Ta
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Shelby Thornton
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - T Michael Underhill
- Department of Cellular and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ana Banito
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma Research Group, Hopp Children's Cancer Center, Heidelberg (KiTZ), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pozner A, Verma SP, Li L, Wang S, Barrott JJ, Nelson ML, Yu JSE, Negri GL, Colborne S, Hughes CS, Zhu JF, Lambert SL, Carroll LS, Smith-Fry K, Stewart MG, Kannan S, Jensen B, Mortenson KL, John C, Sikdar S, Liu H, Dang NH, Bourdage J, Li J, Vahrenkamp JM, Groundland JS, Wustrack R, Senger DL, Zemp FJ, Mahoney DJ, Gertz J, Zhang X, Lazar AJ, Hirst M, Morin GB, Nielsen TO, Shen PS, Jones KB. ASPSCR1-TFE3 reprograms transcription by organizing enhancer loops around hexameric VCP/p97. bioRxiv 2023:2023.09.29.560242. [PMID: 37873234 PMCID: PMC10592841 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.29.560242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
The t(X,17) chromosomal translocation, generating the ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion oncoprotein, is the singular genetic driver of alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) and some Xp11-rearranged renal cell carcinomas (RCC), frustrating efforts to identify therapeutic targets for these rare cancers. Proteomic analysis showed that VCP/p97, an AAA+ ATPase with known segregase function, was strongly enriched in co-immunoprecipitated nuclear complexes with ASPSCR1-TFE3. We demonstrate that VCP is a likely obligate co-factor of ASPSCR1-TFE3, one of the only such fusion oncoprotein co-factors identified in cancer biology. Specifically, VCP co-distributed with ASPSCR1-TFE3 across chromatin in association with enhancers genome-wide. VCP presence, its hexameric assembly, and its enzymatic function orchestrated the oncogenic transcriptional signature of ASPSCR1-TFE3, by facilitating assembly of higher-order chromatin conformation structures as demonstrated by HiChIP. Finally, ASPSCR1-TFE3 and VCP demonstrated co-dependence for cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenesis in vitro and in ASPS and RCC mouse models, underscoring VCP's potential as a novel therapeutic target.
Collapse
|
7
|
Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MCU, Leung S, Voduc D, Vickery T, Davies S, Fauron C, He X, Hu Z, Quackenbush JF, Stijleman IJ, Palazzo J, Marron JS, Nobel AB, Mardis E, Nielsen TO, Ellis MJ, Perou CM, Bernard PS. Supervised Risk Predictor of Breast Cancer Based on Intrinsic Subtypes. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4192-4199. [PMID: 37672882 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To improve on current standards for breast cancer prognosis and prediction of chemotherapy benefit by developing a risk model that incorporates the gene expression-based "intrinsic" subtypes luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and basal-like. METHODS A 50-gene subtype predictor was developed using microarray and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction data from 189 prototype samples. Test sets from 761 patients (no systemic therapy) were evaluated for prognosis, and 133 patients were evaluated for prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) to a taxane and anthracycline regimen. RESULTS The intrinsic subtypes as discrete entities showed prognostic significance (P = 2.26E-12) and remained significant in multivariable analyses that incorporated standard parameters (estrogen receptor status, histologic grade, tumor size, and node status). A prognostic model for node-negative breast cancer was built using intrinsic subtype and clinical information. The C-index estimate for the combined model (subtype and tumor size) was a significant improvement on either the clinicopathologic model or subtype model alone. The intrinsic subtype model predicted neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy with a negative predictive value for pCR of 97%. CONCLUSION Diagnosis by intrinsic subtype adds significant prognostic and predictive information to standard parameters for patients with breast cancer. The prognostic properties of the continuous risk score will be of value for the management of node-negative breast cancers. The subtypes and risk score can also be used to assess the likelihood of efficacy from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel S Parker
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michael Mullins
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Maggie C U Cheang
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Samuel Leung
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David Voduc
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Tammi Vickery
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sherri Davies
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christiane Fauron
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Xiaping He
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Zhiyuan Hu
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John F Quackenbush
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Inge J Stijleman
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Juan Palazzo
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - J S Marron
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Andrew B Nobel
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Elaine Mardis
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Matthew J Ellis
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Charles M Perou
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Philip S Bernard
- From the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Genetics, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Departments of Pathology and Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency; Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genome Sequencing Facility and Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Whelan TJ, Smith S, Parpia S, Fyles AW, Bane A, Liu FF, Rakovitch E, Chang L, Stevens C, Bowen J, Provencher S, Théberge V, Mulligan AM, Kos Z, Akra MA, Voduc KD, Hijal T, Dayes IS, Pond G, Wright JR, Nielsen TO, Levine MN. Omitting Radiotherapy after Breast-Conserving Surgery in Luminal A Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:612-619. [PMID: 37585627 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2302344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant radiotherapy is prescribed after breast-conserving surgery to reduce the risk of local recurrence. However, radiotherapy is inconvenient, costly, and associated with both short-term and long-term side effects. Clinicopathologic factors alone are of limited use in the identification of women at low risk for local recurrence in whom radiotherapy can be omitted. Molecularly defined intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer can provide additional prognostic information. METHODS We performed a prospective cohort study involving women who were at least 55 years of age, had undergone breast-conserving surgery for T1N0 (tumor size <2 cm and node negative), grade 1 or 2, luminal A-subtype breast cancer (defined as estrogen receptor positivity of ≥1%, progesterone receptor positivity of >20%, negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and Ki67 index of ≤13.25%), and had received adjuvant endocrine therapy. Patients who met the clinical eligibility criteria were registered, and Ki67 immunohistochemical analysis was performed centrally. Patients with a Ki67 index of 13.25% or less were enrolled and did not receive radiotherapy. The primary outcome was local recurrence in the ipsilateral breast. In consultation with radiation oncologists and patients with breast cancer, we determined that if the upper boundary of the two-sided 90% confidence interval for the cumulative incidence at 5 years was less than 5%, this would represent an acceptable risk of local recurrence at 5 years. RESULTS Of 740 registered patients, 500 eligible patients were enrolled. At 5 years after enrollment, recurrence was reported in 2.3% of the patients (90% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 3.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.1), a result that met the prespecified boundary. Breast cancer occurred in the contralateral breast in 1.9% of the patients (90% CI, 1.1 to 3.2), and recurrence of any type was observed in 2.7% (90% CI, 1.6 to 4.1). CONCLUSIONS Among women who were at least 55 years of age and had T1N0, grade 1 or 2, luminal A breast cancer that were treated with breast-conserving surgery and endocrine therapy alone, the incidence of local recurrence at 5 years was low with the omission of radiotherapy. (Funded by the Canadian Cancer Society and the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation; LUMINA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01791829.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Whelan
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Sally Smith
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Sameer Parpia
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Anthony W Fyles
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Anita Bane
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Fei-Fei Liu
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Eileen Rakovitch
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Lynn Chang
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Christiaan Stevens
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Julie Bowen
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Sawyna Provencher
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Valerie Théberge
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Anna Marie Mulligan
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Zuzana Kos
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Mohamed A Akra
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - K David Voduc
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Tarek Hijal
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Ian S Dayes
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Gregory Pond
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - James R Wright
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| | - Mark N Levine
- From the Department of Oncology, McMaster University and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON (T.J.W., I.S.D., J.R.W.), the Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria (S.S.), the Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (S. Parpia, G.P., M.N.L.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (A.W.F., F.-F.L.), the Department of Pathology, University of Toronto (A.B.), and the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (E.R.), Toronto, the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa (L.C.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON (C.S.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Laurentian University and Radiation Treatment Program, Northeast Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON (J.B.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (S. Provencher), the Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, QC (V.T.), the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, and the Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto (A.M.M.), the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, and the BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (Z.K.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Manitoba and Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg (M.A.A.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of British Columbia and Radiation Therapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver (K.D.V.), the Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal (T.H.), and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (T.O.N.) - all in Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Asleh K, Lluch A, Goytain A, Barrios C, Wang XQ, Torrecillas L, Gao D, Ruiz-Borrego M, Leung S, Bines J, Guerrero-Zotano Á, García-Sáenz JÁ, Cejalvo JM, Herranz J, Torres R, de la Haba-Rodriguez J, Ayala F, Gómez H, Rojo F, Nielsen TO, Martin M. Triple-Negative PAM50 Non-Basal Breast Cancer Subtype Predicts Benefit from Extended Adjuvant Capecitabine. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:389-400. [PMID: 36346687 PMCID: PMC9873250 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-2191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Predictive biomarkers for capecitabine benefit in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have been recently proposed using samples from phase III clinical trials, including non-basal phenotype and biomarkers related to angiogenesis, stroma, and capecitabine activation genes. We aimed to validate these findings on the larger phase III GEICAM/CIBOMA clinical trial. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Tumor tissues from patients with TNBC randomized to standard (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy followed by capecitabine versus observation were analyzed using a 164-gene NanoString custom nCounter codeset measuring mRNA expression. A prespecified statistical plan sought to verify the predictive capacity of PAM50 non-basal molecular subtype and tested the hypotheses that breast tumors with increased expression of (meta)genes for cytotoxic cells, mast cells, endothelial cells, PDL2, and 38 individual genes benefit from adjuvant capecitabine for distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS; primary endpoint) and overall survival. RESULTS Of the 876 women enrolled in the GEICAM/CIBOMA trial, 658 (75%) were evaluable for analysis (337 with capecitabine and 321 without). Of these cases, 553 (84%) were profiled as PAM50 basal-like whereas 105 (16%) were PAM50 non-basal. Non-basal subtype was the most significant predictor for capecitabine benefit [HRcapecitabine, 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.07-0.54; P < 0.001] when compared with PAM50 basal-like (HRcapecitabine, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.63-1.28; P = 0.55; Pinteraction<0.001, adjusted P value = 0.01). Analysis of biological processes related to PAM50 non-basal subtype revealed its enrichment for mast cells, extracellular matrix, angiogenesis, and features of mesenchymal stem-like TNBC subtype. CONCLUSIONS In this prespecified correlative analysis of the GEICAM/CIBOMA trial, PAM50 non-basal status identified patients with early-stage TNBC most likely to benefit from capecitabine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karama Asleh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Interdisciplinary Oncology Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Ana Lluch
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.,Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Angela Goytain
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Carlos Barrios
- Centro de Pesquisa Clínica Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.,LACOG, Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Xue Q. Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Laura Torrecillas
- LACOG, Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre ISSSTE, CDMX, Mexico
| | - Dongxia Gao
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Manuel Ruiz-Borrego
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.,Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Samuel Leung
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - José Bines
- LACOG, Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil.,National Cancer Institute (INCA), Brazil
| | - Ángel Guerrero-Zotano
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, Spain
| | - Jose Ángel García-Sáenz
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Oncology and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Clinico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Miguel Cejalvo
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.,Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Roberto Torres
- LACOG, Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Instituto Nacional del Cáncer, Santiago, Chile
| | - Juan de la Haba-Rodriguez
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC)–Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.,Oncology Biomedical Research National Network (CIBERONC-ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco Ayala
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.,Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
| | - Henry Gómez
- LACOG, Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil.,Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas (INEN), Lima, Peru.,Universidad Ricardo Palma, Lima, Peru
| | - Federico Rojo
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.,Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.,Oncology Biomedical Research National Network (CIBERONC-ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
| | - Torsten O. Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Miguel Martin
- GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain.,Oncology Biomedical Research National Network (CIBERONC-ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Medicine Department, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.,Corresponding Author: Miguel Martin, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C. Dr. Esquerdo, 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain. Phone: 349-1659-2870; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - David L Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Daniel F Hayes
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Acs B, Leung SCY, Kidwell KM, Arun I, Augulis R, Badve SS, Bai Y, Bane AL, Bartlett JMS, Bayani J, Bigras G, Blank A, Buikema H, Chang MC, Dietz RL, Dodson A, Fineberg S, Focke CM, Gao D, Gown AM, Gutierrez C, Hartman J, Kos Z, Lænkholm AV, Laurinavicius A, Levenson RM, Mahboubi-Ardakani R, Mastropasqua MG, Nofech-Mozes S, Osborne CK, Penault-Llorca FM, Piper T, Quintayo MA, Rau TT, Reinhard S, Robertson S, Salgado R, Sugie T, van der Vegt B, Viale G, Zabaglo LA, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Nielsen TO, Rimm DL. Systematically higher Ki67 scores on core biopsy samples compared to corresponding resection specimen in breast cancer: a multi-operator and multi-institutional study. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:1362-1369. [PMID: 35729220 PMCID: PMC9514990 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-022-01104-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Ki67 has potential clinical importance in breast cancer but has yet to see broad acceptance due to inter-laboratory variability. Here we tested an open source and calibrated automated digital image analysis (DIA) platform to: (i) investigate the comparability of Ki67 measurement across corresponding core biopsy and resection specimen cases, and (ii) assess section to section differences in Ki67 scoring. Two sets of 60 previously stained slides containing 30 core-cut biopsy and 30 corresponding resection specimens from 30 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients were sent to 17 participating labs for automated assessment of average Ki67 expression. The blocks were centrally cut and immunohistochemically (IHC) stained for Ki67 (MIB-1 antibody). The QuPath platform was used to evaluate tumoral Ki67 expression. Calibration of the DIA method was performed as in published studies. A guideline for building an automated Ki67 scoring algorithm was sent to participating labs. Very high correlation and no systematic error (p = 0.08) was found between consecutive Ki67 IHC sections. Ki67 scores were higher for core biopsy slides compared to paired whole sections from resections (p ≤ 0.001; median difference: 5.31%). The systematic discrepancy between core biopsy and corresponding whole sections was likely due to pre-analytical factors (tissue handling, fixation). Therefore, Ki67 IHC should be tested on core biopsy samples to best reflect the biological status of the tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balazs Acs
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | - Kelley M Kidwell
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Indu Arun
- Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Renaldas Augulis
- Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Sunil S Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Yalai Bai
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Anita L Bane
- Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - John M S Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Bayani
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gilbert Bigras
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Annika Blank
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Institute of Pathology, Triemli Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Henk Buikema
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin C Chang
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Robin L Dietz
- Department of Pathology, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrew Dodson
- UK NEQAS for Immunocytochemistry and In-Situ Hybridisation, London, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Cornelia M Focke
- Dietrich-Bonhoeffer Medical Center, Neubrandenburg, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany
| | - Dongxia Gao
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Carolina Gutierrez
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Arvydas Laurinavicius
- Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Richard M Levenson
- Department of Medical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Rustin Mahboubi-Ardakani
- Department of Medical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | - Sharon Nofech-Mozes
- University of Toronto Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C Kent Osborne
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Frédérique M Penault-Llorca
- Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, UMR1240, Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Service de Pathologie, Centre Jean PERRIN, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Tammy Piper
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - Tilman T Rau
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Institute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University and University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Stefan Reinhard
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Robertson
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA, Antwerp, Belgium
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Bert van der Vegt
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lila A Zabaglo
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel F Hayes
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mitch Dowsett
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - David L Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Raquib AR, Hofvander J, Ta M, Nielsen TO. Expanding the Use of an SS18-SSX Antibody for Molecular Assays in Synovial Sarcoma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2022; 30:531-539. [PMID: 35880992 PMCID: PMC9444294 DOI: 10.1097/pai.0000000000001049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Synovial sarcoma is an aggressive malignancy that generally affects adolescents and young adults and is characterized by high rates of recurrence and metastasis, with a 10-year survival rate of about 50%. The fusion oncoprotein SS18-SSX, the product of a pathognomonic chromosomal translocation t(X;18), is the oncogenic driver of this sarcoma, disrupting differentiation through widespread epigenetic dysregulation. Experimental research into SS18-SSX biology has been limited by the lack of an antibody that specifically detects the endogenous fusion oncoprotein as opposed to its native SS18 or SSX components. Recently, a rabbit monoclonal antibody was developed and made commercially available, which specifically detects the fusion junction site epitope of SS18-SSX as found in at least 95% of synovial sarcomas. Here, we characterize a suite of molecular biology assays using this new antibody, both confirming existing and reporting on novel applications. We demonstrate its high sensitivity and specificity for synovial sarcoma diagnosis on patient samples through positive immunohistochemical staining on synovial sarcoma, tissue microarray, and full face sections. In addition, we demonstrate detection of the human SS18-SSX protein when expressed in a genetically engineered mouse model of synovial sarcoma. We also demonstrate nuclear staining of SS18-SSX in synovial sarcoma cells using immunofluorescence, and visualize the interaction between SS18-SSX and the BAF complex member BRG1 through a proximity ligation assay. Lastly, we confirm the interaction between SS18-SSX and promoter regions of target genes through chromatin immunoprecipitation. This antibody represents a breakthrough in sarcoma research and has value in multiple applications to expand the knowledge of synovial sarcoma biology.
Collapse
|
13
|
Brashears CB, Prudner BC, Rathore R, Caldwell KE, Dehner CA, Buchanan JL, Lange SE, Poulin N, Sehn JK, Roszik J, Spitzer D, Jones KB, O'Keefe R, Nielsen TO, Taylor EB, Held JM, Hawkins W, Van Tine BA. Malic Enzyme 1 Absence in Synovial Sarcoma Shifts Antioxidant System Dependence and Increases Sensitivity to Ferroptosis Induction with ACXT-3102. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:3573-3589. [PMID: 35421237 PMCID: PMC9378556 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the metabolism of synovial sarcoma (SS) and elucidate the effect of malic enzyme 1 absence on SS redox homeostasis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN ME1 expression was measured in SS clinical samples, SS cell lines, and tumors from an SS mouse model. The effect of ME1 absence on glucose metabolism was evaluated utilizing Seahorse assays, metabolomics, and C13 tracings. The impact of ME1 absence on SS redox homeostasis was evaluated by metabolomics, cell death assays with inhibitors of antioxidant systems, and measurements of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). The susceptibility of ME1-null SS to ferroptosis induction was interrogated in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS ME1 absence in SS was confirmed in clinical samples, SS cell lines, and an SS tumor model. Investigation of SS glucose metabolism revealed that ME1-null cells exhibit higher rates of glycolysis and higher flux of glucose into the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), which is necessary to produce NADPH. Evaluation of cellular redox homeostasis demonstrated that ME1 absence shifts dependence from the glutathione system to the thioredoxin system. Concomitantly, ME1 absence drives the accumulation of ROS and labile iron. ROS and iron accumulation enhances the susceptibility of ME1-null cells to ferroptosis induction with inhibitors of xCT (erastin and ACXT-3102). In vivo xenograft models of ME1-null SS demonstrate significantly increased tumor response to ACXT-3102 compared with ME1-expressing controls. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate the translational potential of targeting redox homeostasis in ME1-null cancers and establish the preclinical rationale for a phase I trial of ACXT-3102 in SS patients. See related commentary by Subbiah and Gan, p. 3408.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlyn B. Brashears
- Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Bethany C. Prudner
- Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Richa Rathore
- Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Katharine E. Caldwell
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Carina A. Dehner
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Division of Anatomic and Molecular Pathology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jane L. Buchanan
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Sara E.S. Lange
- Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Neal Poulin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jennifer K. Sehn
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Division of Anatomic and Molecular Pathology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jason Roszik
- Departments of Melanoma Medical Oncology and Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dirk Spitzer
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kevin B. Jones
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.,Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Regis O'Keefe
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.,Department of Orthopedics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Torsten O. Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Eric B. Taylor
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.,Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.,Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Jason M. Held
- Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.,Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.,Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - William Hawkins
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Brian A. Van Tine
- Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.,Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.,Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.,Corresponding Author: Brian A. Van Tine, Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8007, St. Louis, MO 63110. Phone: 314-747-3096: E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shenasa E, Stovgaard ES, Jensen MB, Asleh K, Riaz N, Gao D, Leung S, Ejlertsen B, Laenkholm AV, Nielsen TO. Neither Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes nor Cytotoxic T Cells Predict Enhanced Benefit from Chemotherapy in the DBCG77B Phase III Clinical Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153808. [PMID: 35954471 PMCID: PMC9367267 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Apart from the direct killing of cancer cells, cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy has been shown to induce an antitumor immune response, and is being used in combination with immunotherapies in cancer care. We assessed the interaction of chemotherapy with immune biomarkers expressed on primary tumor tissue from a randomized phase III clinical trial, and confirmed that the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is linked to improved survival in premenopausal women with high-risk breast cancer, regardless of their treatment allocation. However, immune biomarkers including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes do not predict extra benefit from cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. This finding applies across the major molecular subgroups, including non-luminal and basal breast cancers that tend to be more immunogenic, and are often considered the most suitable subsets for receiving immunotherapy. Abstract Recent studies have shown that immune infiltrates in the tumor microenvironment play a role in response to therapy, with some suggesting that patients with immunogenic tumors may receive increased benefit from chemotherapies. We evaluated this hypothesis in early breast cancer by testing the interaction between immune biomarkers and chemotherapy using materials from DBCG77B, a phase III clinical trial where high-risk premenopausal women were randomized to receive chemotherapy or no chemotherapy. Tissue microarrays were evaluated for tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) assessed morphologically on hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides, and by immunohistochemistry for CD8, FOXP3, LAG-3, PD-1 and PD-L1. Following REMARK reporting guidelines, data analyses were performed according to a prespecified statistical plan, using 10-year invasive disease-free survival as the endpoint. Differences in survival probabilities between biomarker groups were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard ratio analyses and prediction for treatment benefit by an interaction test. Our results showed that stromal TILs were associated with an improved prognosis (HR = 0.93; p-value = 0.03), consistent with previous studies. However, none of the immune biomarkers predicted benefit from chemotherapy in the full study set nor within major breast cancer subtypes. Our study indicates that primary tumors with higher immune infiltration do not derive extra benefit from cyclophosphamide-based cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elahe Shenasa
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6H 3Z6, BC, Canada
| | | | - Maj-Britt Jensen
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karama Asleh
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6H 3Z6, BC, Canada
| | - Nazia Riaz
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6H 3Z6, BC, Canada
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Dongxia Gao
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6H 3Z6, BC, Canada
| | - Samuel Leung
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6H 3Z6, BC, Canada
| | - Bent Ejlertsen
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Torsten O. Nielsen
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6H 3Z6, BC, Canada
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Asleh K, Lluch A, Goytain A, Barrios C, Wang XQ, Herranz J, Gao D, Caballero R, Leung S, Rojo F, Nielsen TO, Martin M. Abstract 5271: Correlative analysis of RNA biomarkers for adjuvant capecitabine benefit in the CIBOMA/2004-01phase III clinical trial of triple negative breast cancer patients. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-5271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Predictive biomarkers for capecitabine benefit in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) have been recently identified using samples from phase III clinical trials, including immunohistochemical (IHC) non-basal phenotype and RNA biomarkers related to angiogenesis, stroma and capecitabine activation genes. We aimed to validate these findings on the larger phase III CIBOMA clinical trial.
Experimental Design: Tumor tissues from TNBC patients randomized to standard (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine vs. observation were analyzed using a 164 gene NanoString custom nCounter codeset. A prespecified statistical plan sought to verify the predictive capacity of PAM50 non-basal molecular subtype previously found by IHC, and tested the hypotheses that breast tumors with increased expression of (meta)genes for cytotoxic T cells, mast cells, endothelial cells, PDL2 and 38 individual genes benefit from adjuvant capecitabine for distant recurrence free survival (DRFS, primary endpoint) and overall survival. Exploratory analyses investigated (a) predictive capacity of categorical expression of biomarkers, and continuous expression of additional genes included in the codeset; (b) the prognostic capacity of continuous biomarker expression.
Results: Of the 876 women enrolled in the CIBOMA trial, 658 (75%) were evaluable for analysis (337 with capecitabine and 321 without) with similar baseline characteristics relative to the intention-to-treat population. 553 (84%) cases were profiled as PAM50 basal-like while 105 (16%) were PAM50 non-basal. PAM50 non-basal subtype was the most significant predictor for capecitabine benefit (HRcapecitabine=0.19; 95%CI, 0.07-0.54; p=0<0.001) when compared to PAM50 basal-like (HRcapecitabine=0.9; 95%CI, 0.63-1.28; p=0.55) (p-interaction<0.001, adjusted p-value=0.01). Analysis of biological processes related to PAM50 non-basal subtype revealed its enrichment for mast cells, extracellular matrix, angiogenesis and features of the mesenchymal stem-like TNBC subtype. Multivariate analysis showed a significantly lower DRFS on the observation arm for the mast cell metagene (HRobservation=1.35; 95%CI, 1.12-1.62; p=0.002, adjusted p-value=0.006), particularly among PAM50 non-basal tumors (HRobservation=2.70; 95%CI, 0.99-7.35; p=0.01, p-interaction=0.08). Tumors above the median for genes involved in immune response (PDL2, CCR5), capecitabine metabolism (CES1) and angiogenesis (STC1) were significantly associated with favorable survival rates on the capecitabine arm (HRcapecitabine ranged between 0.51-0.60; p=0<0.05).
Conclusions: In this prespecified correlative analysis of the CIBOMA trial, PAM50 non-basal status and the mast cell metagene identified early-stage TNBC patients most likely to benefit from adjuvant capecitabine.
Citation Format: Karama Asleh, Ana Lluch, Angela Goytain, Carlos Barrios, Xue Q. Wang, Jesus Herranz, Dongxia Gao, Rosalia Caballero, Samuel Leung, Federico Rojo, Torsten O. Nielsen, Miguel Martin. Correlative analysis of RNA biomarkers for adjuvant capecitabine benefit in the CIBOMA/2004-01phase III clinical trial of triple negative breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5271.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karama Asleh
- 1Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ana Lluch
- 2GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia and Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Angela Goytain
- 1Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Carlos Barrios
- 3Centro de Pesquisa Clínica Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; LACOG, Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Xue Q. Wang
- 1Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Dongxia Gao
- 1Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Samuel Leung
- 1Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Federico Rojo
- 5GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain; Pathology Department, IIS-Fundación Jimenez Diaz-CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Torsten O. Nielsen
- 1Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Miguel Martin
- 6GEICAM, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Oncología ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Whelan TJ, Smith S, Nielsen TO, Parpia S, Fyles AW, Bane A, Liu FF, Grimard L, Stevens C, Bowen J, Provencher S, Rakovitch E, Theberge V, Mulligan AM, Akra MA, Voduc KD, Hijal T, Dayes IS, Pond GR, Levine MN. LUMINA: A prospective trial omitting radiotherapy (RT) following breast conserving surgery (BCS) in T 1N 0 luminal A breast cancer (BC). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.17_suppl.lba501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
LBA501 Background: Adjuvant breast RT is usually prescribed following BCS to reduce the risk of local recurrence (LR). However, this treatment is inconvenient, costly, and associated with acute and late toxicity. Traditional clinical pathological factors (CPFs) alone are limited in their ability to identify women with a low enough risk of LR to omit RT. Molecular defined intrinsic subtypes of BC provide additional prognostic information with luminal A having the lowest risk of recurrence. A retrospective analysis of a previous trial suggested that women >60 years with luminal A grade 1-2 T1N0 BC treated by BCS and endocrine therapy alone had a low rate of LR ( JCO 2015; 33:2035). The utility of identifying luminal A subtype combined with CPFs has not been prospectively evaluated for its ability to guide RT decision-making. Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study was performed. Eligibility criteria were: women ≥ 55 years; having undergone BCS for grade 1-2 T1N0 BC; ≥ 1mm margins of excision; luminal A subtype (defined as: ER ≥ 1%, PR>20%, HER2 negative and Ki67 ≤ 13.25%); and treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy. ER, PR and HER2 were performed locally as per ASCO guidelines. Patients meeting clinical eligibility with ER ≥ 1%, PR>20%, HER2 negative BC were registered and had Ki67 immunohistochemistry performed centrally in one of three Canadian laboratories using International Ki67 Working Group methods. Proficiency testing between laboratories was performed yearly. Patients with Ki67 ≤ 13.25% were enrolled in the trial and were assigned to not receive RT. The primary outcome was LR defined as time from enrollment to any invasive or non-invasive cancer in the ipsilateral breast. Assuming a 5-year LR rate of 3.5%, 500 patients were required to show that the upper bound of a two sided 90% (one-sided 95%) confidence interval (CI) was <5%. Patients were followed every six months for the first two years and then yearly. The probability of LR was estimated using the cumulative incidence function with death as a competing risk. Secondary outcomes were contralateral BC; relapse free survival (RFS) based on any recurrence; disease free survival (DFS) based on any recurrence, second cancer or death; and overall survival (OS). Results: From August 2013 to July 2017, 501 of 727 registered patients from 26 centers had a Ki67 ≤ 13.25% and were enrolled. Median follow-up was 5 years. Median age was 67 and 442 (88%) patients were <75 years. Median tumor size was 1.1 cm. The 5-year rate of LR satisfied our pre-specified boundary (see Table). Conclusions: Women ≥ 55 years with grade 1-2 T1N0 luminal A BC following BCS treated with endocrine therapy alone had very low rates of LR at 5 years and are candidates for omission of RT. Clinical trial information: NCT01791829. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Torsten O. Nielsen
- University of British Columbia, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sameer Parpia
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Anthony W. Fyles
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anita Bane
- Toronto General Hospital - UHN, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Fei-Fei Liu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre - UHN, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Julie Bowen
- Northeast Cancer Centre/Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | - Sawyna Provencher
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Mohamed A. Akra
- CancerCare Manitoba/University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | | | - Tarek Hijal
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Mark Norman Levine
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Riaz N, Burugu S, Cheng AS, Leung SCY, Gao D, Nielsen TO. Prognostic Significance of CSF-1R Expression in Early Invasive Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5769. [PMID: 34830923 PMCID: PMC8616299 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF-1R) signaling promotes an immune suppressive microenvironment enriched in M2 macrophages. Given that CSF-1R inhibitors are under investigation in clinical trials, including in breast cancer, CSF-1R expression and association with immune biomarkers could identify patients who derive greater benefit from combination with immunotherapies. TIMER2.0 and bc-GenExMiner v4.7 were used to assess the correlation of CSF1R mRNA with immune infiltrates and prognosis. Following a prespecified training-validation approach, an optimized immunohistochemistry assay was applied to assess CSF-1R on carcinoma cells and macrophages on breast cancer tissue microarray series representing 2384 patients, coupled to comprehensive clinicopathological, biomarker, and outcome data. Significant positive correlations were observed between CSF1R mRNA and immune infiltrates. High carcinoma CSF-1R correlated with grade 3 tumors >2 cm, hormone receptor negativity, high Ki67, immune checkpoint biomarkers, and macrophages expressing CSF-1R and CD163. High carcinoma CSF-1R was significantly associated with poor survival in univariate and multivariate analyses. Adverse prognostic associations were retained in ER+ cases regardless of the presence of CD8+ T cells. CSF-1R+ macrophages were not prognostic. High carcinoma CSF-1R is associated with aggressive breast cancer biology and poor prognosis, particularly in ER+ cases, and identifies patients in whom biomarker-directed CSF-1R therapies may yield superior therapeutic responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazia Riaz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z7, Canada; (N.R.); (S.B.); (A.S.C.); (S.C.Y.L.); (D.G.)
- Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Samantha Burugu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z7, Canada; (N.R.); (S.B.); (A.S.C.); (S.C.Y.L.); (D.G.)
| | - Angela S. Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z7, Canada; (N.R.); (S.B.); (A.S.C.); (S.C.Y.L.); (D.G.)
| | - Samuel C. Y. Leung
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z7, Canada; (N.R.); (S.B.); (A.S.C.); (S.C.Y.L.); (D.G.)
| | - Dongxia Gao
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z7, Canada; (N.R.); (S.B.); (A.S.C.); (S.C.Y.L.); (D.G.)
| | - Torsten O. Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z7, Canada; (N.R.); (S.B.); (A.S.C.); (S.C.Y.L.); (D.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Klaric KA, Riaz N, Asleh K, Wang XQ, Atalla T, Strickland S, Nielsen TO, Kos Z. SOX10 is a highly specific biomarker of basal-like breast cancer. Histopathology 2021; 80:589-597. [PMID: 34725848 DOI: 10.1111/his.14592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Basal-like breast cancer is an aggressive molecular subtype associated with younger age and early relapse. Most cases lack expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, limiting targeted therapeutic options. Basal-like breast cancer is defined by expression of genes in the outer/basally-located epithelial layer of mammary glands including those encoding cytokeratins 5 and 14, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). SOX10, a readily available immunohistochemical stain, is expressed in a subset of breast cancers, particularly triple-negative carcinomas. In this study, we sought to (i) assess the association between SOX10 expression and intrinsic molecular subtypes as defined by PAM50 gene expression and (ii) compare the performance of SOX10 to other surrogate markers of basal-like subtype, including CK5, EGFR, nestin and INPP4b. METHODS AND RESULTS SOX10 immunostaining was performed on tissue microarrays constructed from a contemporary series enriched for ER negative and weakly positive cancers, which had also undergone PAM50 gene profiling. A total of 211 cases were informative for both SOX10 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and PAM50 subtype, including 103 basal-like. Staining for SOX10 was positive in 73/103 basal-like cancers and only 2/108 other subtypes (p<0.001), resulting in a sensitivity of 70.9% and a specificity of 98.1%. SOX10 was more specific than the other tested basal-markers and the results were independent of estrogen receptor status. CONCLUSIONS SOX10 is a moderately sensitive, but highly specific IHC biomarker for the basal-like intrinsic subtype of breast cancer, which unlike other commonly used IHC biomarkers, is independent of hormone receptor status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina-Ana Klaric
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nazia Riaz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Aga Khan University, Pakistan
| | - Karama Asleh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Xiu Qing Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Tadros Atalla
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah Strickland
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Pathology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Asleh K, Tu D, Gao D, Bramwell V, Levine MN, Pritchard KI, Shepherd LE, Nielsen TO. Predictive Significance of an Optimized Panel for Basal-like Breast Cancer: Results from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group MA.5 and MA.12 Phase III Clinical Trials. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:6570-6579. [PMID: 34615722 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate IHC biomarkers incorporating nestin positivity or inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphate (INPP4B) loss have recently been optimized to identify the basal-like intrinsic breast cancer subtype regardless of estrogen, progesterone, or Her2 status. We examined the predictive capacity of these basal biomarkers in the CCTG MA.5 chemotherapy and MA.12 endocrine therapy trials. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded blocks of primary tumors from patients randomized in the two trials were used to build tissue microarrays. IHC staining for nestin and INPP4B followed published methods and REMARK criteria. A prespecified statistical plan tested the hypothesis that patients with basal breast cancer (nestin+ or INPP4B-) would not benefit from anthracycline substitution in MA.5 or from tamoxifen in MA.12. RESULTS Nestin positivity or INPP4B loss was observed in 110/453 (24%) interpretable samples from MA.5 and 47/366 (13%) from MA.12, and was associated with high grade, younger age, estrogen receptor negativity, triple-negative, core basal, and PAM50 basal-like subtypes. In the MA.5 trial, patients assigned as basal experienced lower benefit from anthracycline versus nonanthracycline adjuvant chemotherapy [HR, 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-3.10] when compared with non-basal (nestin- and INPP4B+) cases where there was a higher benefit from anthracyclines (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.54-1.04; P interaction = 0.01). In the MA.12 trial, patients assigned as basal did not demonstrate a benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen versus placebo (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.12-1.86; P = 0.29), whereas nonbasal cases displayed significant benefit (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.98; P = 0.04), although the interaction test was not significant. CONCLUSIONS The nestin/INPP4B IHC panel identifies women with basal breast cancers who benefit from nonanthracycline chemotherapy but not endocrine adjuvant treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karama Asleh
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Dongsheng Tu
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dongxia Gao
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Vivien Bramwell
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark N Levine
- Department of Medical Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Lois E Shepherd
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhu C, Rogers A, Asleh K, Won J, Gao D, Leung S, Li S, Vij KR, Zhu J, Held JM, You Z, Nielsen TO, Shao J. Phospho-Ser 784-VCP Is Required for DNA Damage Response and Is Associated with Poor Prognosis of Chemotherapy-Treated Breast Cancer. Cell Rep 2021; 31:107745. [PMID: 32521270 PMCID: PMC7282751 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Spatiotemporal protein reorganization at DNA damage sites induced by genotoxic chemotherapies is crucial for DNA damage response (DDR), which influences treatment response by directing cancer cell fate. This process is orchestrated by valosin-containing protein (VCP), an AAA+ ATPase that extracts polyubiquinated chromatin proteins and facilitates their turnover. However, because of the essential and pleiotropic effects of VCP in global proteostasis, it remains challenging practically to understand and target its DDR-specific functions. We describe a DNA-damage-induced phosphorylation event (Ser784), which selectively enhances chromatin-associated protein degradation mediated by VCP and is required for DNA repair, signaling, and cell survival. These functional effects of Ser784 phosphorylation on DDR correlate with a decrease in VCP association with chromatin, cofactors NPL4/UFD1, and polyubiquitinated substrates. Clinically, high phospho-Ser784-VCP levels are significantly associated with poor outcome among chemotherapy-treated breast cancer patients. Thus, Ser784 phosphorylation is a DDR-specific enhancer of VCP function and a potential predictive biomarker for chemotherapy treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cuige Zhu
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Anna Rogers
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Karama Asleh
- Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Jennifer Won
- Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Dongxia Gao
- Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Samuel Leung
- Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Shan Li
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Kiran R Vij
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Jian Zhu
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Jason M Held
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Zhongsheng You
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Jieya Shao
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nielsen TO, Leung SCY, McShane LM, Dowsett M, Hayes DF. Response to Zhang and Yang. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1597-1598. [PMID: 34003287 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Torsten O Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Samuel C Y Leung
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lisa M McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mitch Dowsett
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Daniel F Hayes
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stovgaard ES, Asleh K, Riaz N, Leung S, Gao D, Nielsen LB, Lænkholm AV, Balslev E, Jensen MB, Nielsen D, O Nielsen T. The immune microenvironment and relation to outcome in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with docetaxel with or without gemcitabine. Oncoimmunology 2021; 10:1924492. [PMID: 34026336 PMCID: PMC8118411 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2021.1924492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Preclinical studies suggest that some effects of conventional chemotherapy, and in particular, gemcitabine, are mediated through enhanced antitumor immune responses. The objective of this study was to use material from a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether patients with preexisting immune infiltrates responded better to treatment with gemcitabine + docetaxel (GD) compared to docetaxel alone. Formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissues from SBG0102 phase 3 trial patients randomly assigned to treatment with GD or docetaxel were used. Immunohistochemical staining for CD8, FOXP3, LAG3, PD-1, PD-L1 and CD163 was performed. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumor associated macrophages were evaluated. Prespecified statistical analyses were performed in a formal prospective-retrospective design. Time to progression was primary endpoint and overall survival secondary endpoint. Correlations between biomarker status and endpoints were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. Biomarker data was obtained for 237 patients. There was no difference in treatment effect according to biomarker status for the whole cohort. In planned subgroup analysis by PAM50 subtype, in non-luminal (basal-like and HER2E) breast cancers FOXP3 was a significant predictor of treatment effect with GD compared to docetaxel, with a HR of 0.22 (0.09–0.52) for tumors with low FOXP3 compared to HR 0.92 (0.47–1.80) for high FOXP3 TILs (Pinteraction = 0.01). Immune biomarkers were not predictive of added benefit of gemcitabine in a cohort of mixed breast cancer subtypes. However, in non-luminal breast cancers, patients with low FOXP3+ TILs may have significant benefit from added gemcitabine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth S Stovgaard
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Karama Asleh
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nazia Riaz
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Samuel Leung
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Dongxia Gao
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lise B Nielsen
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Eva Balslev
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Maj-Britt Jensen
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dorte Nielsen
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chumsri S, Carter JM, Ma Y, Hinerfeld D, Brauer HA, Warren S, Nielsen TO, Asleh K, Joensuu H, Perez EA, Leon-Ferre RA, Hillman DW, Boughey JC, Liu MC, Ingle JN, Kalari KR, Couch FJ, Knutson KL, Goetz MP, Thompson EA. Abstract PS6-02: Spatially defined immune-related proteins and outcome in triple negative breast cancer in the FinXX trial and Mayo Clinic cohort. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-ps6-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Growing data established the pivotal role of preexisting immune response in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Conventionally, preexisting immune response can be evaluated by quantifying tumor infiltrating lymphocytes mainly in the stroma or gene expression analysis from the whole tumor section. Due to technical challenges with these conventional methods, limited data regarding specific subtypes and spatial distribution of these immune infiltrates are currently available. Methods: NanoString IO360 gene expression analysis and Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) were used. DSP was used to quantify 29 immune-related proteins in stromal and tumor-enriched segments from 44 TNBC samples from the FinXX trial (NCT00114816) and 335 samples from the Mayo Clinic (MC) cohort of centrally reviewed TNBC (Leon-Ferre BCRT 2018). In FinXX trial, 22 patients with recurrence and 22 patients without recurrence were included. In MC cohort, 217/335 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy while 118 patients had surgery only without adjuvant chemotherapy. Regions were segmented based on pancytokeratin staining. The general linear model was used for statistical analysis of differential expression with recurrence free survival (RFS) as a categorical variable (recur yes or no). Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates and Cox regression models were also used for analysis. Results: In the FinXX trial, there were 12 out of 29 proteins in tumor epithelial segments (intraepithelial) which were significantly expressed at higher levels among patients who were free of recurrence. These proteins include Beta-2 microglobulin, CD11c, CD20, CD40, CD56, CD8, Granzyme B, HLA-DR, ICOS, PD-L1, PD-L2, and TGFB1. In contrast, merely 5 out of 29 proteins in stromal segments were significantly differentially expressed in these 2 groups of patients. Granzyme B, IDO1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 in stroma were significantly higher and SMA was significantly lower in patients without recurrence. Using Cox regression models, intraepithelial CD56, CD40, and HLA-DR were significantly associated with outcome. When comparing between highest and lowest intraepithelial protein expression by tertile, intraepithelial CD56 (HR 0.12, 95%CI 0.03-0.39, p < 0.001), CD40 (HR 0.13, 95%CI 0.04-0.46, p = 0.002), and HLA-DR (HR 0.24, 95%CI 0.06-0.89, p = 0.032) were significantly associated with improved outcome. However, expression of these same proteins in stroma was not associated with outcome. Using KM estimates, intraepithelial CD56 (p < 0.0001), CD40 (p = 0.0006), and HLA-DR (p = 0.013) were also significantly associated with improved outcome. Nonetheless, RNA expression of these proteins by IO360 from whole tumor sections were not significantly associated with outcome (CD56 p = 0.27, CD40 p = 0.21, HLA-DR p = 0.48). Similar findings with DSP were observed in MC TNBC cohort. Comparing between the highest and lowest quartiles, there were significantly fewer patients who developed recurrence with high protein expression of intraepithelial CD56 (p < 0.001), CD40 (p = 0.002), and HLA-DR (p = 0.006). Conclusions: Using an in-depth analysis with spatially defined context, we identify that there were numerically more intraepithelial immune-related proteins associated with outcome compared to proteins in stroma. Specifically, intraepithelial CD56, CD40, and HLA-DR were significantly associated with improved outcome in both FinXX and MC TNBC cohorts. However, neither expression of these proteins in stroma nor RNA expression from whole tumor were associated with outcome. Our study highlights the impact of spatial biology and the importance of evaluating each potential biomarker in a spatially defined manner. Support: W81XWH-15-1-0292, BCRF 19-161, P50CA116201-9, P50CA015083
Citation Format: Saranya Chumsri, Jodi M. Carter, Yaohua Ma, Douglas Hinerfeld, Heather Ann Brauer, Sarah Warren, Torsten O. Nielsen, Karama Asleh, Heikki Joensuu, Edith A. Perez, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, David W. Hillman, Judy C. Boughey, Minetta C. Liu, James N. Ingle, Krishna R. Kalari, Fergus J. Couch, Keith L. Knutson, Matthew P. Goetz, E. A. Thompson. Spatially defined immune-related proteins and outcome in triple negative breast cancer in the FinXX trial and Mayo Clinic cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS6-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Karama Asleh
- 4University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Asleh K, Negri GL, Miko SES, Colborne S, Hughes CS, Wang XQ, Gao D, Gilks CB, Chia SK, Nielsen TO, Morin GB. Abstract PS18-06: Proteomic analysis of breast cancer formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded clinical specimens identifies biologically-important subtypes with distinct clinical outcomes. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-ps18-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Genomic classification of breast cancer has advanced breast cancer diagnosis and outcomes. However, extensive heterogeneity still exists beyond their DNA or RNA profiles. Newer classifications based on protein profiling are being developed to investigate the molecular oncology of breast cancers at the level where most drugs act. Using a recently-developed technology, we performed global proteomic profiling of 300 breast cancer specimens linked to outcome data. Methods: Sections of 75 samples from each PAM50 intrinsic subtype (Luminal A, Luminal B, Her2-enriched, Basal-like; n = 300) were macrodissected and analyzed using the Single-Pot Solid-Phase enhanced Sample Preparation Clinical Tissue Proteomics, a highly sensitive 11-sample multiplex massspectrometry protocol applicable to formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) specimens. This methodology enables comprehensive quantification of protein expression for classifier and biomarker discovery. Patients were diagnosed during 2008-2013 (n = 178, dataset I) and 1986-1992 (n = 122, dataset II). Results: In-depth proteomic analysis measured 9088 proteins in total, including 4214 proteins quantified in every sample. Consensus clustering of 174 evaluable cases in dataset I identified four distinct groups based on expression values for 1054 highly variant proteins. Cluster 3 (n = 47, mostly basal-like with HER2-Enriched) displayed the most favorable recurrence free survival (RFS) when compared to other clusters (HR = 0.22, 95%CI [0.08-0.63], p = 0.005). This cluster was enriched for immune related pathways including antigen processing and presentation and type I & II interferon signaling, and displayed high tumor infiltrating lymphocyte counts, characterizing this cluster as “immune hot”. In contrast, cluster 2 (n = 50, mostly basal-like) exhibited the poorest RFS (HR = 2.88, 95%CI [1.45-5.70], p = 0.002) and was enriched for proteins related to stromal and extracellular matrix with few immune related peptides. Cluster 1 (n = 34, luminal B and HER2-Enriched) was associated with lipid metabolism, whereas cluster 4 (n = 43, mostly HER2-Enriched with luminal A and luminal B) had a profile enriched for extracellular matrix, blood coagulation and complement activation. Conclusions: Global proteomic analysis on FFPE specimens can characterize the heterogeneity of breast cancer in a reliable and clinically-applicable high throughput manner. Our methodology identifies protein candidates that potentially serve as therapeutic targets and could be adapted to archived clinical specimens from other tumors.
Citation Format: Karama Asleh, Gian Luca Negri, Sandra E. Spencer Miko, Shane Colborne, Christopher S. Hughes, Xiu Q. Wang, Dongxia Gao, C. Blake Gilks, Stephen K.L. Chia, Torsten O. Nielsen, Gregg B. Morin. Proteomic analysis of breast cancer formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded clinical specimens identifies biologically-important subtypes with distinct clinical outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS18-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karama Asleh
- 1Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gian Luca Negri
- 2Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Shane Colborne
- 2Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Xiu Q. Wang
- 1Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Dongxia Gao
- 1Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - C. Blake Gilks
- 1Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Stephen K.L. Chia
- 3Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Gregg B. Morin
- 2Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nielsen TO, Leung SCY, Rimm DL, Dodson A, Acs B, Badve S, Denkert C, Ellis MJ, Fineberg S, Flowers M, Kreipe HH, Laenkholm AV, Pan H, Penault-Llorca FM, Polley MY, Salgado R, Smith IE, Sugie T, Bartlett JMS, McShane LM, Dowsett M, Hayes DF. Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 113:808-819. [PMID: 33369635 PMCID: PMC8487652 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 261] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Ki67 immunohistochemistry (IHC), commonly used as a proliferation marker in breast cancer, has limited value for treatment decisions due to questionable analytical validity. The International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group (IKWG) consensus meeting, held in October 2019, assessed the current evidence for Ki67 IHC analytical validity and clinical utility in breast cancer, including the series of scoring studies the IKWG conducted on centrally stained tissues. Consensus observations and recommendations are: 1) as for estrogen receptor and HER2 testing, preanalytical handling considerations are critical; 2) a standardized visual scoring method has been established and is recommended for adoption; 3) participation in and evaluation of quality assurance and quality control programs is recommended to maintain analytical validity; and 4) the IKWG accepted that Ki67 IHC as a prognostic marker in breast cancer has clinical validity but concluded that clinical utility is evident only for prognosis estimation in anatomically favorable estrogen receptor–positive and HER2-negative patients to identify those who do not need adjuvant chemotherapy. In this T1-2, N0-1 patient group, the IKWG consensus is that Ki67 5% or less, or 30% or more, can be used to estimate prognosis. In conclusion, analytical validity of Ki67 IHC can be reached with careful attention to preanalytical issues and calibrated standardized visual scoring. Currently, clinical utility of Ki67 IHC in breast cancer care remains limited to prognosis assessment in stage I or II breast cancer. Further development of automated scoring might help to overcome some current limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torsten O Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Samuel C Y Leung
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - David L Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Andrew Dodson
- The UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Immunocytochemistry and In-Situ Hybridisation, London, UK
| | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Cancer Centre Karolinska (CCK), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Pathology and Cytology, Karolinska University Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sunil Badve
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Philipps University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Matthew J Ellis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Hans H Kreipe
- Medical School Hannover, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Hongchao Pan
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Mei-Yin Polley
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago Biological Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, GasthuisZusters Antwerpen / Hospital Network Antwerp (GZA-ZNA), Antwerp, Belgium.,Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ian E Smith
- Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Tomoharu Sugie
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Shinmachi, Hirakata City, Osaka Prefecture, Japan
| | - John M S Bartlett
- Diagnostic Development Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lisa M McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mitch Dowsett
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Daniel F Hayes
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang XQ, Wang XQ, Hsu ATYW, Goytain A, Ng TLT, Nielsen TO. A Rapid and Cost-Effective Gene Expression Assay for the Diagnosis of Well-Differentiated and Dedifferentiated Liposarcomas. J Mol Diagn 2020; 23:274-284. [PMID: 33346147 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Histologic examination neither reliably distinguishes benign lipomas from atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma, nor dedifferentiated liposarcoma from other pleomorphic sarcomas, entities with different prognoses and management. Molecular confirmation of pathognomonic 12q13-15 amplifications leading to MDM2 overexpression is a diagnostic gold standard. Currently the most commonly used assay for this purpose is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), but this is labor intensive. This study assessed whether newer NanoString-based technology could allow for more rapid and cost-efficient diagnosis of liposarcomas on standard formalin-fixed tissues through gene expression. Leveraging large-scale transcriptome data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, 20 genes were identified, most from the 12q13-15 amplicon, that distinguish dedifferentiated liposarcoma from other sarcomas and can be measured within a single NanoString assay. Using 21 cases of histologically ambiguous low-grade adipocytic tumors with available MDM2 amplification status, a machine learning-based analytical pipeline was built that assigns a given sample as negative or positive for liposarcoma based on quantitative gene expression. The effectiveness of the assay was validated on an independent set of 100 sarcoma samples (including 40 incident prospective cases), where histologic examination was considered insufficient for clinical diagnosis. The NanoString assay had a 93% technical success rate, and an accuracy of 97.8% versus an MDM2 amplification FISH gold standard. NanoString had a considerably faster turnaround time and was cheaper than FISH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiu Q Wang
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Xue Q Wang
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anika T Y W Hsu
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Angela Goytain
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tony L T Ng
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nielsen TO. Human Germline Gene Therapy. Mcgill J Med 2020. [DOI: 10.26443/mjm.v3i2.546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
28
|
Zhu MMT, Shenasa E, Nielsen TO. Sarcomas: Immune biomarker expression and checkpoint inhibitor trials. Cancer Treat Rev 2020; 91:102115. [PMID: 33130422 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Sarcomas are a heterogenous group of mesenchymal cancers comprising over 100 subtypes. Current chemotherapy for all but a very few subtypes has limited efficacy, resulting in 5-year relative survival rates of 16% for metastatic patients. While sarcomas have often been regarded as an "immune cold" tumor category, recent biomarker studies have confirmed a great deal of immune heterogeneity across sarcoma subtypes. Reports from the first generation of clinical trials treating sarcomas with immunotherapy demonstrate a few positive responses, supporting efforts to stratify patients to optimize response rates. This review summarizes recent advances in knowledge around immune biomarker expression in sarcomas, the potential use of new technologies to complement these study results, and clinical trials particularly of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in sarcomas. Each of the immune biomarkers assessed was reviewed for subtype-specific expression patterns and correlation with prognosis. Overall, there is extensive heterogeneity of immune biomarker presence across sarcoma subtypes, and no consensus on the prognostic effect of these biomarkers. New technologies such as multiplex immunohistochemistry and high plex in situ profiling may offer more insights into the sarcoma microenvironment. To date, clinical trials using immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy have not shown compelling clinical benefits. Combination therapy with dual checkpoint inhibitors or in combinations with other agents has yielded more promising results in dedifferentiated liposarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, angiosarcoma and alveolar soft-part sarcoma. Better understanding of the sarcoma immune status through biomarkers may help decipher the reasons behind differential responses to immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayanne M T Zhu
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elahe Shenasa
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Epigenetic regulation is critical to physiological control of development, cell fate, cell proliferation, genomic integrity and, fundamentally, transcriptional regulation. This epigenetic control occurs at multiple levels including through DNA methylation, histone modification, nucleosome remodelling and modulation of the 3D chromatin structure. Alterations in genes that encode chromatin regulators are common among mesenchymal neoplasms, a collection of more than 160 tumour types including over 60 malignant variants (sarcomas) that have unique and varied genetic, biological and clinical characteristics. Herein, we review those sarcomas in which chromatin pathway alterations drive disease biology. Specifically, we emphasize examples of dysregulation of each level of epigenetic control though mechanisms that include alterations in metabolic enzymes that regulate DNA methylation and histone post-translational modifications, mutations in histone genes, subunit loss or fusions in chromatin remodelling and modifying complexes, and disruption of higher-order chromatin structure. Epigenetic mechanisms of tumorigenesis have been implicated in mesenchymal tumours ranging from chondroblastoma and giant cell tumour of bone to chondrosarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour, synovial sarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma and Ewing sarcoma - all diseases that present in a younger patient population than most cancers. Finally, we review current and potential future approaches for the development of sarcoma therapies based on this emerging understanding of chromatin dysregulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Nacev
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- The Laboratory of Chromatin Biology and Epigenetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin B Jones
- Department of Orthopaedics, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Andrew M Intlekofer
- Human Oncology & Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamie S E Yu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - C David Allis
- The Laboratory of Chromatin Biology and Epigenetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - William D Tap
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc Ladanyi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhu MMT, Burugu S, Gao D, Yu J, Kos Z, Leung S, Horst BA, Nielsen TO. Evaluation of glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor (GITR) expression in breast cancer and across multiple tumor types. Mod Pathol 2020; 33:1753-1763. [PMID: 32350416 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0550-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Revised: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor (GITR) is an emerging immunotherapy target that is expressed at high levels on regulatory T cells. Agonistic anti-GITR antibodies have anti-tumor activity in cancer mouse models, and recent phase 1 trials have demonstrated their safe pharmacological profile. However, there is limited knowledge on the relationship between GITR expression and the tumor microenvironment. GITR protein expression was assayed by immunohistochemistry on 3992 breast cancer surgical excision specimens assembled into tissue microarrays and scored visually by a pathologist for GITR expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and on carcinoma cells. GITR expression by the malignant cells was further surveyed in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (N = 713), lung carcinoma (N = 705), pancreatic cancer (N = 486), ovarian cancer (N = 445), bladder cancer (N = 88), prostate cancer (N = 88), testicular cancer (N = 76), melanoma (N = 75), renal cell carcinoma (N = 68), epithelioid sarcoma (N = 53), and neuroendocrine tumors (N = 41). In breast cancer, GITR expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (12.4%) correlated with other immune response biomarkers (PD-L1+ on tumor cells, and PD-1+, LAG-3+, TIM-3+ lymphocytes; p < 0.001), and T-cell markers (CD8+, FOXP3+; p < 0.001). GITR+ carcinoma cells were observed in 6.0% of breast cancer cases and correlated with worse relapse-free survival (p = 0.015). Among the additional tumor types examined, cancers with GITR+ malignant cells included bladder cancer (5.7%), primary (but not metastatic) melanoma (4.5%), and ovarian cancer (3.2%); no expression was identified among examined sarcomas. To our knowledge, this is the first immunohistochemistry study to report the frequency and pattern of GITR expression in a large breast cancer cohort, or to report membranous GITR expression on malignant cells. The co-infiltration of GITR with other immune biomarkers and T-cell markers supports a potential role for anti-GITR agents in combination immunotherapies. In addition, GITR expression on carcinoma cells could imply the existence of a novel cancer immune evasion strategy worthy of further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayanne M T Zhu
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Samantha Burugu
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Dongxia Gao
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jamie Yu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Samuel Leung
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Basil A Horst
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. .,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cheng AS, Leung SCY, Gao D, Burugu S, Anurag M, Ellis MJ, Nielsen TO. Correction to: Mismatch repair protein loss in breast cancer: clinicopathological associations in a large British Columbia cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 182:765. [PMID: 32564259 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05745-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
In the original publication of the article, the funding statement was published incompletely. The corrected funding statement should read as below.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela S Cheng
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Samuel C Y Leung
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Dongxia Gao
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Samantha Burugu
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. .,Anatomical Pathology JPN1401 Vancouver Hospital, 855 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chumsri S, Carter JM, Ma Y, Hinerfeld D, Brauer HA, Warren S, Nielsen TO, Asleh K, Joensuu H, Perez EA, Leon-Ferre RA, Hillman DW, Boughey JC, Liu MC, Ingle JN, Kalari KR, Couch F, Knutson KL, Goetz MP, Thompson EA. Role of intratumoral NK cells in triple-negative breast cancer in the FinXX trial and Mayo Clinic cohort. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
510 Background: Several studies have established the critical role of preexisting immune response in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Most studies evaluated the tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in stroma. However, limited data are available with regards to the importance of specific subtypes and spatial distribution of these immune infiltrates. Methods: NanoString IO360 gene expression analysis and Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) were used. DSP was used to quantify 39 immune-related proteins in stromal and tumor-enriched segments from 44 TNBC samples from the FinXX trial (NCT00114816) and 335 samples from the Mayo Clinic (MC) cohort of centrally reviewed TNBC (Leon-Ferre BCRT 2018). In FinXX trial, 22 patients with recurrence and 22 patients without recurrence were included. In MC cohort, 217/335 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy while 118 patients had surgery only without adjuvant chemotherapy. Regions were segmented based on pancytokeratin staining. The general linear model was used for statistical analysis of differential expression with recurrence free survival (RFS) as a categorical variable (recur yes or no). Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression models were also used for analysis. Results: In the FinXX trial, using global gene expression analysis with IO360, there was no signature significantly associated with RFS. However, using DSP, high protein expression of CD56 in the tumor-enriched segments was associated with significant improvement in RFS (HR 0.26, 95%CI 0.09-0.78, p 0.01). Nevertheless, CD56 expression in the stroma (HR 0.66, 95%CI 0.29-1.53, p 0.33) and all segments (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.23-1.25, p 0.14) was not significantly associated with improved outcome. We further validated these findings in the MC TNBC cohort where intratumoral CD56 expression was associated with a significant improvement in RFS (HR 0.23, p 0.002) but not stromal CD56 (p 0.79). Interestingly, when evaluating the MC TNBC cohort according to receipt of chemotherapy, intratumoral CD56 was associated with improved outcome only in patients who received chemotherapy (p 0.02 vs. 0.07). In both cohorts, higher expressions of intratumoral PD-L1, HLA-DR, and CD8 were associated with improved outcome. Conclusions: Using an in-depth analysis with spatially defined context, we identify that intratumoral CD56-positive NK cells are associated with improved outcome in TNBC. Our study highlights the potential role of NK cells in TNBC and future implications for biomarkers and therapeutic targets.Support: W81XWH-15-1-0292, P50CA116201-9, P50CA015083. Clinical trial information: NCT00114816 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Karama Asleh
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Heikki Joensuu
- Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Fergus Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kos Z, Roblin E, Kim RS, Michiels S, Gallas BD, Chen W, van de Vijver KK, Goel S, Adams S, Demaria S, Viale G, Nielsen TO, Badve SS, Symmans WF, Sotiriou C, Rimm DL, Hewitt S, Denkert C, Loibl S, Luen SJ, Bartlett JMS, Savas P, Pruneri G, Dillon DA, Cheang MCU, Tutt A, Hall JA, Kok M, Horlings HM, Madabhushi A, van der Laak J, Ciompi F, Laenkholm AV, Bellolio E, Gruosso T, Fox SB, Araya JC, Floris G, Hudeček J, Voorwerk L, Beck AH, Kerner J, Larsimont D, Declercq S, Van den Eynden G, Pusztai L, Ehinger A, Yang W, AbdulJabbar K, Yuan Y, Singh R, Hiley C, Bakir MA, Lazar AJ, Naber S, Wienert S, Castillo M, Curigliano G, Dieci MV, André F, Swanton C, Reis-Filho J, Sparano J, Balslev E, Chen IC, Stovgaard EIS, Pogue-Geile K, Blenman KRM, Penault-Llorca F, Schnitt S, Lakhani SR, Vincent-Salomon A, Rojo F, Braybrooke JP, Hanna MG, Soler-Monsó MT, Bethmann D, Castaneda CA, Willard-Gallo K, Sharma A, Lien HC, Fineberg S, Thagaard J, Comerma L, Gonzalez-Ericsson P, Brogi E, Loi S, Saltz J, Klaushen F, Cooper L, Amgad M, Moore DA, Salgado R. Pitfalls in assessing stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020; 6:17. [PMID: 32411819 PMCID: PMC7217863 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-0156-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are important prognostic and predictive biomarkers in triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive breast cancer. Incorporating sTILs into clinical practice necessitates reproducible assessment. Previously developed standardized scoring guidelines have been widely embraced by the clinical and research communities. We evaluated sources of variability in sTIL assessment by pathologists in three previous sTIL ring studies. We identify common challenges and evaluate impact of discrepancies on outcome estimates in early TNBC using a newly-developed prognostic tool. Discordant sTIL assessment is driven by heterogeneity in lymphocyte distribution. Additional factors include: technical slide-related issues; scoring outside the tumor boundary; tumors with minimal assessable stroma; including lymphocytes associated with other structures; and including other inflammatory cells. Small variations in sTIL assessment modestly alter risk estimation in early TNBC but have the potential to affect treatment selection if cutpoints are employed. Scoring and averaging multiple areas, as well as use of reference images, improve consistency of sTIL evaluation. Moreover, to assist in avoiding the pitfalls identified in this analysis, we developed an educational resource available at www.tilsinbreastcancer.org/pitfalls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology, BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, BC Canada
| | - Elvire Roblin
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Rim S. Kim
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Brandon D. Gallas
- Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability (DIDSR); Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL); Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), Silver Spring, MD USA
| | - Weijie Chen
- Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability (DIDSR); Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL); Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), Silver Spring, MD USA
| | - Koen K. van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Shom Goel
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Medical School, New York, NY USA
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY USA
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Torsten O. Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sunil S. Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA
| | - W. Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David L. Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg and Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Stephen J. Luen
- Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
- Division of Research and Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - John M. S. Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON Canada
- University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter Savas
- Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
- Division of Research and Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS Fondazione Instituto Nazionale Tumori and University of Milan, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Deborah A. Dillon
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Department of Pathology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Maggie Chon U. Cheang
- Institute of Cancer Research Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey, UK
| | - Andrew Tutt
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Marleen Kok
- Department of Medical Oncology and Division of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo M. Horlings
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH USA
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH USA
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Computational Pathology Group, Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Computational Pathology Group, Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Enrique Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | | | - Stephen B. Fox
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Department of Pathology, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | | | - Giuseppe Floris
- KU Leuven- Univerisity of Leuven, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and KU Leuven- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Hudeček
- Department of Research IT, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie Voorwerk
- Division of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Denis Larsimont
- Department of Pathology, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Lajos Pusztai
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Anna Ehinger
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Wentao Yang
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China
| | - Khalid AbdulJabbar
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer; Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer; Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Rajendra Singh
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
| | - Crispin Hiley
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Maise al Bakir
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alexander J. Lazar
- Departments of Pathology, Genomic Medicine, Dermatology, and Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Stephen Naber
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - Stephan Wienert
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Miluska Castillo
- Department of Medical Oncology and Research, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, 15038 Peru
| | | | - Maria-Vittoria Dieci
- Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Fabrice André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Charles Swanton
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- Francis Crick Institute, Midland Road, London, UK
| | - Jorge Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Joseph Sparano
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY USA
| | - Eva Balslev
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - I-Chun Chen
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Oncology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Katherine Pogue-Geile
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Kim R. M. Blenman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | | | - Stuart Schnitt
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Sunil R. Lakhani
- The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research and Pathology Queensland, Brisbane, QLD Australia
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences Lettres Université, Inserm U934, Department of Pathology, Paris, France
| | - Federico Rojo
- Pathology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD) - CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
- GEICAM-Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jeremy P. Braybrooke
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford and Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Matthew G. Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - M. Teresa Soler-Monsó
- Department of Pathology, Bellvitge University Hospital, IDIBELL. Breast Unit. Catalan Institut of Oncology. L ‘Hospitalet del Llobregat’, Barcelona, 08908 Catalonia Spain
| | - Daniel Bethmann
- University Hospital Halle (Saale), Institute of Pathology, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Carlos A. Castaneda
- Department of Medical Oncology and Research, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, 15038 Peru
| | - Karen Willard-Gallo
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Universitè Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ashish Sharma
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Huang-Chun Lien
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY USA
| | - Jeppe Thagaard
- DTU Compute, Department of Applied Mathematics, Technical University of Denmark; Visiopharm A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark
| | - Laura Comerma
- GEICAM-Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group, Madrid, Spain
- Pathology Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paula Gonzalez-Ericsson
- Breast Cancer Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Edi Brogi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Sherene Loi
- Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
- Division of Research and Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Joel Saltz
- Biomedical Informatics Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY USA
| | - Frederick Klaushen
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lee Cooper
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Mohamed Amgad
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - David A. Moore
- Department of Pathology, UCL Cancer Institute, UCL, London, UK
- University College Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Division of Research and Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hudeček J, Voorwerk L, van Seijen M, Nederlof I, de Maaker M, van den Berg J, van de Vijver KK, Sikorska K, Adams S, Demaria S, Viale G, Nielsen TO, Badve SS, Michiels S, Symmans WF, Sotiriou C, Rimm DL, Hewitt SM, Denkert C, Loibl S, Loi S, Bartlett JMS, Pruneri G, Dillon DA, Cheang MCU, Tutt A, Hall JA, Kos Z, Salgado R, Kok M, Horlings HM. Application of a risk-management framework for integration of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in clinical trials. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020; 6:15. [PMID: 32436923 PMCID: PMC7217941 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-0155-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are a potential predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). To incorporate sTILs into clinical trials and diagnostics, reliable assessment is essential. In this review, we propose a new concept, namely the implementation of a risk-management framework that enables the use of sTILs as a stratification factor in clinical trials. We present the design of a biomarker risk-mitigation workflow that can be applied to any biomarker incorporation in clinical trials. We demonstrate the implementation of this concept using sTILs as an integral biomarker in a single-center phase II immunotherapy trial for metastatic TNBC (TONIC trial, NCT02499367), using this workflow to mitigate risks of suboptimal inclusion of sTILs in this specific trial. In this review, we demonstrate that a web-based scoring platform can mitigate potential risk factors when including sTILs in clinical trials, and we argue that this framework can be applied for any future biomarker-driven clinical trial setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hudeček
- Department of Research IT, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie Voorwerk
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje van Seijen
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Nederlof
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel de Maaker
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jose van den Berg
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Karolina Sikorska
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Department of Medicine, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY USA
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY USA
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- International Breast Cancer Study Group Central Pathology Office, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Torsten O. Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada
| | - Sunil S. Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN USA
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Service de Biostatistique et d’Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, CESP, Université-Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- CESP, Fac. de médecine - Univ. Paris-Sud, Fac. de médecine - UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, U-CRC, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David L. Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Stephen M. Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Research and Clinical Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - John M. S. Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON Canada
- IGMM, Edinburgh, UK
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IRCCS Fondazion - Instituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Deborah A. Dillon
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Maggie C. U. Cheang
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey, UK
| | - Andrew Tutt
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Division of Research and Clinical Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marleen Kok
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo M. Horlings
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Amgad M, Stovgaard ES, Balslev E, Thagaard J, Chen W, Dudgeon S, Sharma A, Kerner JK, Denkert C, Yuan Y, AbdulJabbar K, Wienert S, Savas P, Voorwerk L, Beck AH, Madabhushi A, Hartman J, Sebastian MM, Horlings HM, Hudeček J, Ciompi F, Moore DA, Singh R, Roblin E, Balancin ML, Mathieu MC, Lennerz JK, Kirtani P, Chen IC, Braybrooke JP, Pruneri G, Demaria S, Adams S, Schnitt SJ, Lakhani SR, Rojo F, Comerma L, Badve SS, Khojasteh M, Symmans WF, Sotiriou C, Gonzalez-Ericsson P, Pogue-Geile KL, Kim RS, Rimm DL, Viale G, Hewitt SM, Bartlett JMS, Penault-Llorca F, Goel S, Lien HC, Loibl S, Kos Z, Loi S, Hanna MG, Michiels S, Kok M, Nielsen TO, Lazar AJ, Bago-Horvath Z, Kooreman LFS, van der Laak JAWM, Saltz J, Gallas BD, Kurkure U, Barnes M, Salgado R, Cooper LAD. Report on computational assessment of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020; 6:16. [PMID: 32411818 PMCID: PMC7217824 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-0154-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is increasingly recognized as an integral part of the prognostic workflow in triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive breast cancer, as well as many other solid tumors. This recognition has come about thanks to standardized visual reporting guidelines, which helped to reduce inter-reader variability. Now, there are ripe opportunities to employ computational methods that extract spatio-morphologic predictive features, enabling computer-aided diagnostics. We detail the benefits of computational TILs assessment, the readiness of TILs scoring for computational assessment, and outline considerations for overcoming key barriers to clinical translation in this arena. Specifically, we discuss: 1. ensuring computational workflows closely capture visual guidelines and standards; 2. challenges and thoughts standards for assessment of algorithms including training, preanalytical, analytical, and clinical validation; 3. perspectives on how to realize the potential of machine learning models and to overcome the perceptual and practical limits of visual scoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Amgad
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | | | - Eva Balslev
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Jeppe Thagaard
- DTU Compute, Department of Applied Mathematics, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
- Visiopharm A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark
| | - Weijie Chen
- FDA/CDRH/OSEL/Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Silver Spring, MD USA
| | - Sarah Dudgeon
- FDA/CDRH/OSEL/Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Silver Spring, MD USA
| | - Ashish Sharma
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Khalid AbdulJabbar
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Stephan Wienert
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Research and Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Leonie Voorwerk
- Department of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anant Madabhushi
- Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, OH USA
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Cleveland, OH USA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Manu M. Sebastian
- Departments of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Hugo M. Horlings
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Hudeček
- Department of Research IT, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - David A. Moore
- Department of Pathology, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Rajendra Singh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY USA
| | - Elvire Roblin
- Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Marcelo Luiz Balancin
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marie-Christine Mathieu
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Jochen K. Lennerz
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Department of Histopathology, Manipal Hospitals Dwarka, New Delhi, India
| | - I-Chun Chen
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jeremy P. Braybrooke
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Pathology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori and University of Milan, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Sylvia Adams
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Stuart J. Schnitt
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Sunil R. Lakhani
- The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research and Pathology Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Federico Rojo
- Pathology Department, CIBERONC-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD), Madrid, Spain
- GEICAM-Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Comerma
- Pathology Department, CIBERONC-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD), Madrid, Spain
- GEICAM-Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sunil S. Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN USA
| | | | - W. Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- ULB-Cancer Research Center (U-CRC) Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paula Gonzalez-Ericsson
- Breast Cancer Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | | | | | - David L. Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS & State University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stephen M. Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - John M. S. Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON Canada
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Frédérique Penault-Llorca
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- UMR INSERM 1240, Universite Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Shom Goel
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre building, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Huang-Chun Lien
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, c/o GBG-Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
| | - Sherene Loi
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Matthew G. Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Gustave Roussy, Universite Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Sud, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Villejuif, France
| | - Marleen Kok
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alexander J. Lazar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | | | - Loes F. S. Kooreman
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen A. W. M. van der Laak
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY USA
| | - Brandon D. Gallas
- FDA/CDRH/OSEL/Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Silver Spring, MD USA
| | - Uday Kurkure
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Digital Pathology, Santa Clara, CA USA
| | - Michael Barnes
- Roche Diagnostics Information Solutions, Belmont, CA USA
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Division of Research and Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lee A. D. Cooper
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Osako T, Lee H, Turashvili G, Chiu D, McKinney S, Joosten SEP, Wilkinson D, Nielsen TO, Zwart W, Emerman JT, Eaves CJ, Caldas C, Aparicio S. Age-correlated protein and transcript expression in breast cancer and normal breast tissues is dominated by host endocrine effects. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 1:518-532. [DOI: 10.1038/s43018-020-0060-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
37
|
Dancsok AR, Gao D, Lee AF, Steigen SE, Blay JY, Thomas DM, Maki RG, Nielsen TO, Demicco EG. Tumor-associated macrophages and macrophage-related immune checkpoint expression in sarcomas. Oncoimmunology 2020; 9:1747340. [PMID: 32313727 PMCID: PMC7153829 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2020.1747340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Revised: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Early trials for immune checkpoint inhibitors in sarcomas have delivered mixed results, and efforts to improve outcomes now look to combinatorial strategies with novel immunotherapeutics, including some that target macrophages. To enhance our understanding of the sarcoma immune landscape, we quantified and characterized tumor-associated macrophage infiltration and expression of the targetable macrophage-related immune checkpoint CD47/SIRPα across sarcoma types. We surveyed immunohistochemical expression of CD68, CD163, CD47, and SIRPα in tissue microarrays of 1242 sarcoma specimens (spanning 24 types). Non-translocation sarcomas, particularly undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma, had significantly higher counts of both CD68+ and CD163+ macrophages than translocation-associated sarcomas. Across nearly all sarcoma types, macrophages outnumbered tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and CD163+ (M2-like) macrophages outnumbered CD68+ (M1-like) macrophages. These findings were supported by data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, which showed a correlation between increasing macrophage contributions to immune infiltration and several measures of DNA damage. CD47 expression was bimodal, with most cases showing either 0% or >90% tumor cell staining, and the highest CD47 scores were observed in chordoma, angiosarcoma, and pleomorphic liposarcoma. SIRPα scores correlated well with CD47 expression. Given the predominance of macrophage infiltrates over tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, the bias toward M2-like (immunosuppressive) macrophage polarization, and the generally high scores for CD47 and SIRPα, macrophage-focused immunomodulatory agents, such as CD47 or IDO-1 inhibitors, may be particularly worthwhile to pursue in sarcoma patients, alone or in combination with lymphocyte-focused agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda R Dancsok
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Dongxia Gao
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anna F Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sonja Eriksson Steigen
- Clinical Pathology and Institute of Medical Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - David M Thomas
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre and Cancer Theme, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | - Robert G Maki
- Northwell Health Monter Cancer Center and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Elizabeth G Demicco
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Stovgaard ES, Sua LF, Reisenbichler E, Kos Z, Carter JM, Michiels S, Le Quesne J, Nielsen TO, Laenkholm AV, Fox SB, Adam J, Bartlett JM, Rimm DL, Quinn C, Peeters D, Dieci MV, Vincent-Salomon A, Cree I, Hida AI, Balko JM, Haynes HR, Frahm I, Acosta-Haab G, Balancin M, Bellolio E, Yang W, Kirtani P, Sugie T, Ehinger A, Castaneda CA, Kok M, McArthur H, Siziopikou K, Badve S, Fineberg S, Gown A, Viale G, Schnitt SJ, Pruneri G, Penault-Llorca F, Hewitt S, Thompson EA, Allison KH, Symmans WF, Bellizzi AM, Brogi E, Moore DA, Larsimont D, Dillon DA, Lazar A, Lien H, Goetz MP, Broeckx G, El Bairi K, Harbeck N, Cimino-Mathews A, Sotiriou C, Adams S, Liu SW, Loibl S, Chen IC, Lakhani SR, Juco JW, Denkert C, Blackley EF, Demaria S, Leon-Ferre R, Gluz O, Zardavas D, Emancipator K, Ely S, Loi S, Salgado R, Sanders M. The path to a better biomarker: application of a risk management framework for the implementation of PD-L1 and TILs as immuno-oncology biomarkers in breast cancer clinical trials and daily practice. J Pathol 2020; 250:667-684. [PMID: 32129476 DOI: 10.1002/path.5406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 are now the standard of care in oncology across several hematologic and solid tumor types, including triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients with metastatic or locally advanced TNBC with PD-L1 expression on immune cells occupying ≥1% of tumor area demonstrated survival benefit with the addition of atezolizumab to nab-paclitaxel. However, concerns regarding variability between immunohistochemical PD-L1 assay performance and inter-reader reproducibility have been raised. High tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have also been associated with response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer (BC). TILs can be easily assessed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides and have shown reliable inter-reader reproducibility. As an established prognostic factor in early stage TNBC, TILs are soon anticipated to be reported in daily practice in many pathology laboratories worldwide. Because TILs and PD-L1 are parts of an immunological spectrum in BC, we propose the systematic implementation of combined PD-L1 and TIL analyses as a more comprehensive immuno-oncological biomarker for patient selection for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition-based therapy in patients with BC. Although practical and regulatory considerations differ by jurisdiction, the pathology community has the responsibility to patients to implement assays that lead to optimal patient selection. We propose herewith a risk-management framework that may help mitigate the risks of suboptimal patient selection for immuno-therapeutic approaches in clinical trials and daily practice based on combined TILs/PD-L1 assessment in BC. © 2020 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elisabeth S Stovgaard
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Luz F Sua
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fundación Valle del Lili, and Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad ICESI, Cali, Colombia
| | | | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jodi M Carter
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Service, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - John Le Quesne
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- MRC Toxicology Unit, University of Cambridge, Leicester, UK
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Stephen B Fox
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Julien Adam
- Department of Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Grand Paris, France
| | - John Ms Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David L Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Cecily Quinn
- Department of Pathology, St Vincent's University Hospital and University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Dieter Peeters
- HistoGeneX NV, Antwerp, Belgium
- AZ Sint-Maarten Hospital, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Maria V Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Ian Cree
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of Pathology, Matsuyama Shimin Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Justin M Balko
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Harry R Haynes
- Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
- Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Isabel Frahm
- Department of Pathology, Sanatorio Mater Dei, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Gabriela Acosta-Haab
- Department of Pathology, Hospital de Oncología Maria Curie, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Marcelo Balancin
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Enrique Bellolio
- Department of Pathology, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - Wentao Yang
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Department of Histopathology, Manipal Hospitals Dwarka, New Delhi, India
| | - Tomoharu Sugie
- Breast Surgery, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Anna Ehinger
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Carlos A Castaneda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru
| | - Marleen Kok
- Divisions of Medical Oncology, Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heather McArthur
- Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kalliopi Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Breast Pathology Section, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Allen Gown
- PhenoPath Laboratories, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stuart J Schnitt
- Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS Fondazione Instituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- Department of Biology and Pathology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France
- UMR INSERM 1240, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Experimental Pathology Laboratory, Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - William F Symmans
- Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew M Bellizzi
- Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Edi Brogi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David A Moore
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL Cancer Institute, and Department of Cellular Pathology, UCLH, London, UK
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Department of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Deborah A Dillon
- Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander Lazar
- Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Huangchun Lien
- Graduate Institute of Pathology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Khalid El Bairi
- Cancer Biomarkers Working Group, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohamed Ist University, Oujda, Morocco
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of OB&GYN and CCC (LMU), University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ashley Cimino-Mathews
- Department of Pathology and Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Medical School, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - I-Chun Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sunil R Lakhani
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, and Pathology Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia
| | - Jonathan W Juco
- Translational Medicine, Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg and Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Elizabeth F Blackley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Oleg Gluz
- Johanniter GmbH - Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda Mönchengladbach, West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Scott Ely
- Translational Medicine, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Sherene Loi
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Melinda Sanders
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Jensen MB, Lænkholm AV, Balslev E, Buckingham W, Ferree S, Glavicic V, Dupont Jensen J, Søegaard Knoop A, Mouridsen HT, Nielsen D, Nielsen TO, Ejlertsen B. The Prosigna 50-gene profile and responsiveness to adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020; 6:7. [PMID: 32140564 PMCID: PMC7044229 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-0148-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The DBCG89D trial randomized high-risk early breast cancer patients to adjuvant CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil) or CEF (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluorouracil). Prosigna assays were performed by researchers with no access to clinical data. Time to distant recurrence (DR) was the primary endpoint, time to recurrence (TR) and overall survival (OS) secondary. Among the 980 Danish patients enrolled, Prosigna results were obtained in 686. Continuous ROR score was associated with DR for CMF (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.33), and for CEF (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.92-1.18), P interaction = 0.06. DR was significantly longer in CEF compared to CMF treated patients with Her2-enriched tumors (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.86), but not in patients with luminal tumors. Heterogeneity of treatment effect was significant for TR and OS. In this prospective-retrospective analysis, patients with Her2-enriched breast cancer derived substantial benefit from anthracycline chemotherapy whereas anthracyclines are not an essential component of chemotherapy for patients with luminal subtypes. The benefit of CEF vs. CMF correlated with increasing ROR Score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maj-Britt Jensen
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Eva Balslev
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | | | - Sean Ferree
- NanoString Technologies Inc, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Vesna Glavicic
- Department of Oncology, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| | | | - Ann Søegaard Knoop
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henning T. Mouridsen
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dorte Nielsen
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Torsten O. Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada
| | - Bent Ejlertsen
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chumsri S, Hinerfeld D, Kachergus JM, Ma Y, Brauer HA, Warren S, Wang X, Nielsen TO, Asleh K, Joensuu H, Perez EA, Thompson EA. Abstract PD5-06: Digital spatial mapping of the immune landscape of triple negative breast cancer reveals novel features of immune-tumor cell interaction. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-pd5-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Growing evidence supports the critical role of preexisting immune response in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, there are limitations with current evaluation approaches: inability to functionally assess the type of immune infiltration with traditional pathologic evaluation and loss of spatial distribution in conventional high-plex gene or protein expression analyses from the whole tumor section. Here, we report the initial analysis of immune protein expression as a function of spatial distribution and clinical outcomes in TNBC samples. Methods: NanoString GeoMxTM Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) was used to quantify 39 immune-related proteins in stromal and tumor segments from 44 TNBC samples from the FinXX trial. Samples were matched for patient characteristics, treatment arm (capecitabine vs. 5-fluorouracil), and outcome based on recurrence-free survival (RFS) with 22 samples from patients who recurred and 22 samples from patients with durable RFS. Regions of interest (ROIs) were selected based on expression of cytokeratin (tumor), CD45 (leukocytes), or CD68 (macrophages). Each ROI was segmented into tumor (pancytokeratin-positive area) and stroma (pancytokeratin-negative/nuclear SYTO13-positive area). The general linear model was used for statistical analysis of differential expression with RFS as a categorical variable (recur yes or no). Results: A total of 950 tumor and stroma segments were included in this initial analysis. In both tumor and stroma segments, over-expression of T cell activation markers (CD137, GITR) was associated with better outcome, whereas T cell markers (CD3, CD4, CD8) were not significantly associated with outcome. In tumor segments alone, improved outcome was significantly associated with increased protein expression [> 2-fold change (FC) at p<0.001] of CD56, PD-L2, HLA-DR, CD137, GITR, and CD40. In CD45-enriched stroma, improved outcome was associated with elevated expression (FC>2.0, p<0.001) of PD-L2; whereas durable RFS was associated with elevated PD-L2 and IDO1 expression in CD68-enriched stroma. In contrast, macrophage/dendritic cell markers CD68 and CD11c were not associated with outcome. In tumor cells adjacent to CD45-enriched stroma, durable RFS was associated with increased abundance (FC>2.0, p<0.001) of PD-L2, CD56, CD27, GITR, CD20, HLA-DR, and IDO1. Similarly, in tumor segment associated with CD68-enriched stroma, proteins associated with RFS included PD-L2, HLA-DR, CD56, GITR, and CD137. Among 39 immune function proteins, only elevated CTLA4 expression in CD68-enriched stroma was associated with recurrence (FC=0.55, p<0.001), whereas tumor-segment CTLA4 was associated with RFS. Conclusions: Using an in-depth analysis to precisely quantify the abundance of multiple immune function proteins in a spatially defined manner, we observed that PD-L2, IDO1, and T cell activation markers were robustly associated with durable RFS in both tumor and stromal segments. In contrast, MHC components (HLA-DR, beta-2-microglobulin), B cell markers (CD20), and NK cell markers (CD56) were strongly associated with favorable outcome in tumor but not in stromal segments. Our study highlights the conclusion that the immune landscape of TNBC is far too complex to be encompassed by any single molecular marker, and more detailed analyses of the DSP data reported here are ongoing with a view towards using quantitative multiplex analyses to refine our understanding of how therapeutic outcome is influenced by interactions among immune cells and between immune and tumor cells. Acknowledgements: Supported by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF18-161), Bankhead Coley (6BC05 Florida Department of Health), 26.2 with Donna Foundation, US National Cancer Institute (CA15083), and the Canadian Cancer Center
Citation Format: Saranya Chumsri, Douglas Hinerfeld, Jennifer M. Kachergus, Yaohua Ma, Heather A Brauer, Sarah Warren, Xue Wang, Torsten O. Nielsen, Karama Asleh, Heikki Joensuu, Edith A. Perez, E. A. Thompson. Digital spatial mapping of the immune landscape of triple negative breast cancer reveals novel features of immune-tumor cell interaction [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Karama Asleh
- 3The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Acs B, Leung SC, Kidwell KM, Arun I, Augulis R, Badve SS, Bai Y, Bane AL, Bartlett JM, Bayani J, Bigras G, Blank A, Borgquist S, Buikema H, Chang MC, Dietz RL, Dodson A, Ehinger A, Fineberg S, Focke CM, Gao D, Gown AM, Gutierrez C, Hartman J, Hugh JC, Kos Z, Lænkholm AV, Laurinavicius A, Levenson RM, Mahboubi-Ardakani R, Mastropasqua MG, Moriya T, Nofech-Mozes S, Osborne CK, Pantanowitz L, Penault-Llorca FM, Piper T, Quintayo MA, Rau TT, Reinhard S, Robertson S, Sakatani T, Salgado R, Spears M, Starczynski J, Sugie T, van der Vegt B, Viale G, Virk S, Zabaglo LA, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Nielsen TO, Rimm DL. Abstract P5-02-01: Analytical validation and prognostic potential of an automated digital scoring protocol for Ki67: An International Ki67 Working Group study. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p5-02-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The nuclear proliferation biomarker Ki67 has multiple potential roles in breast cancer, including aiding decisions based on prognosis, but has unacceptable between-laboratory variability. Here we tested an open source and calibrated automated digital image analysis (DIA) platform to: (i) Assess inter-laboratory reproducibility of automated Ki67 measurement among 17 participating labs and compare those with standardized pathologist-based visual scoring. (ii) Investigate the comparability of Ki67 measurement across corresponding core biopsy and whole section cases. (iii) Test prognostic potential of the built Ki67 scoring algorithms on an independent cohort.
Methods: Two sets of 60 previously stained slides containing 30 core-cut biopsy and 30 corresponding whole tumor sections from 30 ER+ breast cancer cases were sent to 17 participating labs for automated assessment of average Ki67 expression. The blocks were centrally cut and stained for Ki67 using the Mib-1 antibody. The QuPath (open-source software) DIA platform was used to evaluate tumoral Ki67 expression. Calibration of the DIA method was performed in our previous study (Acs et al, Lab Invest 2019). A detailed guideline for building an automated Ki67 scoring algorithm was sent to the participating labs. Visual scoring of average Ki67 expression was performed by pathologists according to published standardized methods (Leung et al, NPJ Br Cancer 2016; Leung et al, Histopath 2019). Locked down DIA Ki67 scoring algorithms were applied to a validation cohort: 222 breast cancer cases from the Karolinska University Hospital in whole section format. Sufficient reproducibility to declare analytical validity was defined as an Intra Class Correlation (ICC) with lower limit of 95% credible interval (CI) >0.80. Markov Chain Monte Carlo routines for generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate ICCs and calculate corresponding CIs.
Results: The same-section ICC was 0.902 (CI: 0.852-0.949) across 17 labs using calibrated DIA platform on core biopsy slides and 0.845 (CI: 0.778-0.912) on whole sections. The different-section ICC across the 17 labs was 0.873 (CI: 0.806-0.932) scoring on core biopsy slides and 0.777 (CI: 0.670-0.874) on whole sections. The pathologist-based visual Ki67 scoring showed ICC of 0.860 for all comparisons, respectively (CI: 0.795-0.927). Similar to what was observed for visual Ki67 scoring, the DIA scores are higher for core biopsy slides compared to paired whole sections (p≤0.001; median difference: 5.31%; IQR: 11.50%). Ki67 scores of all locked down DIA algorithms correlates significantly (p≤0.023) with outcome on the validation cohort (observed hazard ratios range: 2.518-2.922).
Conclusions: Automated Ki67 evaluation using a calibrated, open-source DIA platform (QuPath) met the pre-specified criterion of success on core biopsies but not on whole sections in the multi-institutional setting. The systematic discrepancy between core biopsy and corresponding whole sections was likely due to pre-analytical factors (tissue handling, fixation) and intratumor heterogeneity. We found that different algorithms built according to calibrated DIA methods had similar prognostic potential. Assessment of clinical utility is planned.
Citation Format: Balazs Acs, Samuel C.Y. Leung, Kelley M. Kidwell, Indu Arun, Renaldas Augulis, Sunil S. Badve, Yalai Bai, Anita L. Bane, John M.S. Bartlett, Jane Bayani, Gilbert Bigras, Annika Blank, Signe Borgquist, Henk Buikema, Martin C. Chang, Robin L. Dietz, Andrew Dodson, Anna Ehinger, Susan Fineberg, Cornelia M. Focke, Dongxia Gao, Allen M. Gown, Carolina Gutierrez, Johan Hartman, Judith C. Hugh, Zuzana Kos, Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm, Arvydas Laurinavicius, Richard M. Levenson, Rustin Mahboubi-Ardakani, Mauro G. Mastropasqua, Takuya Moriya, Sharon Nofech-Mozes, C. Kent Osborne, Liron Pantanowitz, Frédérique M. Penault-Llorca, Tammy Piper, Mary Anne Quintayo, Tilman T. Rau, Stefan Reinhard, Stephanie Robertson, Takashi Sakatani, Roberto Salgado, Melanie Spears, Jane Starczynski, Tomoharu Sugie, Bert van der Vegt, Giuseppe Viale, Shakeel Virk, Lila A. Zabaglo, Daniel F. Hayes, Mitch Dowsett, Torsten O. Nielsen, David L. Rimm, International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group, BIG-NABCG. Analytical validation and prognostic potential of an automated digital scoring protocol for Ki67: An International Ki67 Working Group study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-02-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balazs Acs
- 1Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Kelley M. Kidwell
- 3Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Indu Arun
- 4Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India
| | - Renaldas Augulis
- 5Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Sunil S. Badve
- 6Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Yalai Bai
- 1Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Anita L. Bane
- 7Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jane Bayani
- 8Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gilbert Bigras
- 9Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Annika Blank
- 10Universität Bern Institut für Pathologie, Murtenstrasse, Switzerland
| | | | - Henk Buikema
- 12University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Martin C. Chang
- 13Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT
| | - Robin L. Dietz
- 14Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Andrew Dodson
- 15UK NEQAS for Immunocytochemistry and In-Situ Hybridisation, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Susan Fineberg
- 16Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Dongxia Gao
- 2University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Carolina Gutierrez
- 19Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Zuzana Kos
- 22University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm
- 23Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Arvydas Laurinavicius
- 5Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Richard M. Levenson
- 24Department of Medical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Rustin Mahboubi-Ardakani
- 24Department of Medical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
| | | | | | - Sharon Nofech-Mozes
- 27University of Toronto Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C. Kent Osborne
- 19Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Tammy Piper
- 29Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - Tilman T. Rau
- 10Universität Bern Institut für Pathologie, Murtenstrasse, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Reinhard
- 10Universität Bern Institut für Pathologie, Murtenstrasse, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Melanie Spears
- 8Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jane Starczynski
- 32Birmingham Heart of England, National Health Service, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Shakeel Virk
- 35Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Mitch Dowsett
- 36The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - David L. Rimm
- 1Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Asleh K, Gao D, Bramwell VH, Tu D, Shepherd LE, Nielsen TO. Abstract P2-11-03: Predictive significance of an optimized immunohistochemical panel for basal-like breast cancer on the CCTG MA.12 phase III randomized clinical trial. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p2-11-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors constitute the backbone of treatment for estrogen receptor positive early stage breast cancers based on immunohistochemical (IHC) results. While these therapies significantly reduce the risk of relapse of breast cancer, they have toxicities and add to costs. Gene expression profiling assays are widely used to quantify risk and support targeted therapies for luminal breast cancers treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy. In a prospective-retrospective analysis of the phase III CCTG MA.12 clinical trial (randomizing premenopausal women treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, to either tamoxifen or placebo for 5 years), luminal subtype by PAM50 was significantly predictive for tamoxifen benefit. However, IHC classification (as estrogen receptor positive) could not demonstrate a statistically significant benefit from tamoxifen over placebo. More accurate IHC biomarkers incorporating nestin positivity or loss of inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphate (INPP4B) have recently been optimized to identify the basal-like intrinsic subtype of breast cancer regardless of ER/PR/HER2 status. In this study, we examined the capacity of these basal biomarkers to identify intrinsic subtype and predict benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen vs. placebo in the CCTG MA.12 clinical trial Methods:492 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded blocks of primary tumor from patients randomized in the CCTG MA.12 trial were used to build tissue microarrays. IHC staining for nestin and INPP4B was done according to published methods, and interpretation was performed by pathologists with no access to molecular data. The performance of the nestin and INPP4B panel was assessed against PAM50 gene expression assay as a standard reference. A prespecified statistical plan was executed independently by the Canadian Cancer Trials Group, testing the primary hypothesis that patients with basal breast cancer, when defined as “positive for nestin or negative for INPP4B,” would not benefit from tamoxifen (primary endpoint: disease-free survival).Results: 366 primary tumor samples from the CCTG MA.12 had a full dataset available for IHCbiomarker evaluation, PAM50 subtype and clinical outcomes. Positive staining of nestin or loss of INPP4B was observed in 47 (13%) of the total cases and was significantly associated with poor prognostic factors including high grade, younger age, ER negativity, triple negative and core basal IHC status (p<0.01). “Nestin+ or INPP4B-” status was significantly associated with basal-like PAM50 gene expression subtype, while the other cases (nestin- and INPP4B+) were significantly associated with PAM50 luminal subtype. Patients assigned as basals by “nestin+ or INPP4B-” IHC status did not demonstrate a benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen vs. placebo (HR=1.39, 95%CI [0.37-5.26], p=0.63), whereas “nestin- and INPP4B+” cases displayed a significantly higher benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen vs. placebo (HR=0.67, 95% CI [0.45-0.98], p=0.04), (p-interaction=0.87). While, in this trial, ER clinical status as determined in community hospitals or centrally by single biomarker IHC was not significantly predictive for tamoxifen benefit, patients classified as IHC non-basal “nestin- and INPP4B+” within the ER+ subgroup did benefit from addition of tamoxifen (HR=0.62, 95%CI [0.38-1.01], p=0.05).Conclusions:The nestin/INPP4B IHC panel offers a feasible and inexpensive methodology to accurately identify intrinsic subtype of breast cancer. Patients assigned as IHC basal by this panel did not display a superior survival when treated with tamoxifen vs. placebo in the adjuvant setting. Within the ER+ subgroup, these cases could potentially be spared the side effects of currently recommended endocrine therapies that do not benefit this group of patients.
Citation Format: Karama Asleh, Dongxia Gao, Vivien H Bramwell, Dongsheng Tu, Lois E Shepherd, Torsten O Nielsen. Predictive significance of an optimized immunohistochemical panel for basal-like breast cancer on the CCTG MA.12 phase III randomized clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karama Asleh
- 1Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Dongxia Gao
- 1Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Dongsheng Tu
- 2Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Asleh K, Brauer HA, Sullivan A, Lauttia S, Lindman H, Nielsen TO, Joensuu H, Thompson EA, Chumsri S. Predictive Biomarkers for Adjuvant Capecitabine Benefit in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in the FinXX Clinical Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:2603-2614. [PMID: 32005747 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent studies have demonstrated a benefit of adjuvant capecitabine in early breast cancer, particularly in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, TNBC is heterogeneous and more precise predictive biomarkers are needed. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Tumor tissues collected from TNBC patients in the FinXX trial, randomized to adjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy with or without capecitabine, were analyzed using a 770-gene panel targeting multiple biological mechanisms and additional 30-custom genes related to capecitabine metabolism. Hypothesis-generating exploratory analyses were performed to assess biomarker expression in relation to treatment effect using the Cox regression model and interaction tests adjusted for multiplicity. RESULTS One hundred eleven TNBC samples were evaluable (57 without capecitabine and 54 with capecitabine). The median follow-up was 10.2 years. Multivariate analysis showed significant improvement in recurrence-free survival (RFS) favoring capecitabine in four biologically important genes and metagenes, including cytotoxic cells [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.38; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.16-0.86, P-interaction = 0.01], endothelial (HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.20-2.22, P-interaction = 0.02), mast cells (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.49-1.27, P-interaction = 0.04), and PDL2 (HR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.81, P-interaction = 0.03). Furthermore, we identified 38 single genes that were significantly associated with capecitabine benefit, and these were dominated by immune response pathway and enzymes involved in activating capecitabine to fluorouracil, including TYMP. However, these results were not significant when adjusted for multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS Genes and metagenes related to antitumor immunity, immune response, and capecitabine activation could identify TNBC patients who are more likely to benefit from adjuvant capecitabine. Given the reduced power to observe significant findings when correcting for multiplicity, our findings provide the basis for future hypothesis-testing validation studies on larger clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karama Asleh
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Interdisciplinary Oncology Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Amy Sullivan
- NanoString Technologies Inc., Seattle, Washington
| | - Susanna Lauttia
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Henrik Lindman
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Heikki Joensuu
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, and Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - E Aubrey Thompson
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Saranya Chumsri
- Robert and Monica Jacoby Center for Breast Health, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Dancsok AR, Setsu N, Gao D, Blay JY, Thomas D, Maki RG, Nielsen TO, Demicco EG. Expression of lymphocyte immunoregulatory biomarkers in bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. Mod Pathol 2019; 32:1772-1785. [PMID: 31263176 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0312-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Despite advances in our understanding of the underlying molecular drivers of sarcomas, few treatments are available with proven benefit for advanced metastatic sarcomas. Immunotherapy has value in this setting for some types of cancers, but sarcomas, with their multiplicity of rare types, have not been characterized in detail for their expression of targetable immune biomarkers. This study provides the most systematic evaluation to date of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and immune checkpoint biomarker expression in sarcomas. We examined by morphology and immunohistochemistry 1072 sarcoma specimens representing 22 types, in addition to 236 benign bone and soft-tissue tumors. Genomically-complex sarcoma types-those driven by mutations and/or copy-number alterations-had much higher numbers of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes than translocation-associated sarcomas. Prior exposure to radiotherapy was associated with increased immune infiltrates. Higher lymphocytic infiltration was associated with better overall survival among the non-translocation-associated sarcomas. Expression of PD-1 and CD56 were associated with worse overall survival. LAG-3 and TIM-3, two emerging immune checkpoints, were frequently expressed in most sarcoma types. Indeed, most cases positive for PD-(L)1 coexpressed one or both of these novel biomarkers, providing a potential rationale in support for trials targeting LAG-3 and/or TIM-3 in conjunction with PD-1 inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda R Dancsok
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Nokitaka Setsu
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Dongxia Gao
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard and University Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - David Thomas
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre and Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Robert G Maki
- Northwell Health Monter Cancer Center and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Lake Success, New York, NY, USA
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Elizabeth G Demicco
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Cheng AS, Leung SCY, Gao D, Burugu S, Anurag M, Ellis MJ, Nielsen TO. Mismatch repair protein loss in breast cancer: clinicopathological associations in a large British Columbia cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 179:3-10. [PMID: 31522348 PMCID: PMC6985067 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05438-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Alterations to mismatch repair (MMR) pathways are a known cause of cancer, particularly colorectal and endometrial carcinomas. Recently, checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for use in MMR-deficient cancers of any type (Prasad et al. in JAMA Oncol 4:157–158, 2018). Functional studies in breast cancer have shown associations between MMR loss, resistance to aromatase inhibitors and sensitivity to palbociclib (Haricharan et al. in Cancer Discov 7:1168–1183, 2017). Herein, we investigate the clinical meaning of MMR deficiency in breast cancer by immunohistochemical assessment of MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 and PMS2 on a large series of breast cancers linked to detailed biomarker and long-term outcome data. Methods Cases were classified as MMR intact when all four markers expressed nuclear reactivity, but MMR-deficient when at least one of the four biomarkers displayed loss of nuclear staining in the presence of positive internal stromal controls on the tissue microarray core. Results Among the 1635 cases with interpretable staining, we identified 31 (1.9%) as MMR-deficient. In our cohort, MMR deficiency was present across all major breast cancer subtypes, and was associated with high-grade, low-progesterone receptor expression and high tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte counts. MMR deficiency is significantly associated with inferior overall (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.02–5.17, p = 0.040) and disease-specific survival (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.00–7.35, p = 0.042) in the 431 estrogen receptor-positive patients who were uniformly treated with tamoxifen as their sole adjuvant systemic therapy. Conclusion Overall, this study supports the concept that breast cancer patients with MMR deficiency as assessed by immunohistochemistry may be good candidates for alternative treatment approaches such as immune checkpoint or CDK4 inhibitors. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-019-05438-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela S Cheng
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Samuel C Y Leung
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Dongxia Gao
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Samantha Burugu
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. .,Anatomical Pathology JPN1401 Vancouver Hospital, 855 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ho J, Peters T, Dickson BC, Swanson D, Fernandez A, Frova‐Seguin A, Valentin M, Schramm U, Sultan M, Nielsen TO, Demicco EG. Detection ofCSF1rearrangements deleting the 3′ UTR in tenosynovial giant cell tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2019; 59:96-105. [DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Revised: 08/25/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Ho
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Thomas Peters
- Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research Basel Switzerland
| | - Brendan C. Dickson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineMount Sinai Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - David Swanson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineMount Sinai Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Anita Fernandez
- Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research Basel Switzerland
| | | | | | - Ursula Schramm
- Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research Basel Switzerland
| | - Marc Sultan
- Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research Basel Switzerland
| | - Torsten O. Nielsen
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Elizabeth G. Demicco
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineMount Sinai Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Leung SCY, Nielsen TO, Zabaglo LA, Arun I, Badve SS, Bane AL, Bartlett JMS, Borgquist S, Chang MC, Dodson A, Ehinger A, Fineberg S, Focke CM, Gao D, Gown AM, Gutierrez C, Hugh JC, Kos Z, Laenkholm AV, Mastropasqua MG, Moriya T, Nofech-Mozes S, Osborne CK, Penault-Llorca FM, Piper T, Sakatani T, Salgado R, Starczynski J, Sugie T, van der Vegt B, Viale G, Hayes DF, McShane LM, Dowsett M. Analytical validation of a standardised scoring protocol for Ki67 immunohistochemistry on breast cancer excision whole sections: an international multicentre collaboration. Histopathology 2019; 75:225-235. [PMID: 31017314 DOI: 10.1111/his.13880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The nuclear proliferation marker Ki67 assayed by immunohistochemistry has multiple potential uses in breast cancer, but an unacceptable level of interlaboratory variability has hampered its clinical utility. The International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group has undertaken a systematic programme to determine whether Ki67 measurement can be analytically validated and standardised among laboratories. This study addresses whether acceptable scoring reproducibility can be achieved on excision whole sections. METHODS AND RESULTS Adjacent sections from 30 primary ER+ breast cancers were centrally stained for Ki67 and sections were circulated among 23 pathologists in 12 countries. All pathologists scored Ki67 by two methods: (i) global: four fields of 100 tumour cells each were selected to reflect observed heterogeneity in nuclear staining; (ii) hot-spot: the field with highest apparent Ki67 index was selected and up to 500 cells scored. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the global method [confidence interval (CI) = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.799-0.93] marginally met the prespecified success criterion (lower 95% CI ≥ 0.8), while the ICC for the hot-spot method (0.83; 95% CI = 0.74-0.90) did not. Visually, interobserver concordance in location of selected hot-spots varies between cases. The median times for scoring were 9 and 6 min for global and hot-spot methods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The global scoring method demonstrates adequate reproducibility to warrant next steps towards evaluation for technical and clinical validity in appropriate cohorts of cases. The time taken for scoring by either method is practical using counting software we are making publicly available. Establishment of external quality assessment schemes is likely to improve the reproducibility between laboratories further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Sunil S Badve
- Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Anita L Bane
- Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - John M S Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Signe Borgquist
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Martin C Chang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Andrew Dodson
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Anna Ehinger
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Dongxia Gao
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Carolina Gutierrez
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Zuzana Kos
- University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Sharon Nofech-Mozes
- University of Toronto Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C Kent Osborne
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Tammy Piper
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA, Antwerp, Belgium.,Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jane Starczynski
- Birmingham Heart of England, National Health Service, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Giuseppe Viale
- European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel F Hayes
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yu JSE, Colborne S, Hughes CS, Morin GB, Nielsen TO. The FUS-DDIT3 Interactome in Myxoid Liposarcoma. Neoplasia 2019; 21:740-751. [PMID: 31220736 PMCID: PMC6584455 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2019.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Myxoid liposarcoma is a malignant lipogenic tumor that develops in deep soft tissues. While local control rates are good, current chemotherapy options remain ineffective against metastatic disease. Myxoid liposarcoma is characterized by the FUS-DDIT3 fusion oncoprotein that is proposed to function as an aberrant transcription factor, but its exact mechanism of action has remained unclear. To identify the key functional interacting partners of FUS-DDIT3, this study utilized immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS) to identify the FUS-DDIT3 interactome in whole cell lysates of myxoid liposarcoma cells, and results showed an enrichment of RNA processing proteins. Further quantitative MS analyses of FUS-DDIT3 complexes isolated from nuclear lysates showed that members of several chromatin regulatory complexes were present in the FUS-DDIT3 interactome, including NuRD, SWI/SNF, PRC1, PRC2, and MLL1 COMPASS-like complexes. Co-immunoprecipitation validated the associations of FUS-DDIT3 with BRG1/SMARCA4, BAF155/SMARCC1, BAF57/SMARCE1, and KDM1A. Data from this study provides candidates for functional validation as potential therapeutic targets, particularly for emerging epigenetic drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie S E Yu
- Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| | - Shane Colborne
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada.
| | | | - Gregg B Morin
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada; Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada.
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Patel N, Wang J, Shiozawa K, Jones KB, Zhang Y, Prokop JW, Davenport GG, Nihira NT, Hao Z, Wong D, Brandsmeier L, Meadows SK, Sampaio AV, Werff RV, Endo M, Capecchi MR, McNagny KM, Mak TW, Nielsen TO, Underhill TM, Myers RM, Kondo T, Su L. HDAC2 Regulates Site-Specific Acetylation of MDM2 and Its Ubiquitination Signaling in Tumor Suppression. iScience 2019; 13:43-54. [PMID: 30818224 PMCID: PMC6393697 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Revised: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are promising targets for cancer therapy, although their individual actions remain incompletely understood. Here, we identify a role for HDAC2 in the regulation of MDM2 acetylation at previously uncharacterized lysines. Upon inactivation of HDAC2, this acetylation creates a structural signal in the lysine-rich domain of MDM2 to prevent the recognition and degradation of its downstream substrate, MCL-1 ubiquitin ligase E3 (MULE). This mechanism further reveals a therapeutic connection between the MULE ubiquitin ligase function and tumor suppression. Specifically, we show that HDAC inhibitor treatment promotes the accumulation of MULE, which diminishes the t(X; 18) translocation-associated synovial sarcomagenesis by directly targeting the fusion product SS18-SSX for degradation. These results uncover a new HDAC2-dependent pathway that integrates reversible acetylation signaling to the anticancer ubiquitin response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita Patel
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | - Juehong Wang
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | - Kumiko Shiozawa
- Division of Rare Cancer Research, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Kevin B Jones
- Department of Orthopaedics and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Yanfeng Zhang
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | - Jeremy W Prokop
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA; Department of Pediatrics and Human Development, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA
| | | | - Naoe T Nihira
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Zhenyue Hao
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Derek Wong
- Biomdical Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | | | - Sarah K Meadows
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | - Arthur V Sampaio
- Biomdical Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Ryan Vander Werff
- Biomdical Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Makoto Endo
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Mario R Capecchi
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Kelly M McNagny
- Biomdical Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Tak W Mak
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Torsten O Nielsen
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - T Michael Underhill
- Biomdical Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Richard M Myers
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | - Tadashi Kondo
- Division of Rare Cancer Research, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Le Su
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Acs B, Leung SC, Pelekanou V, Bai Y, Martinez-Morilla S, Toki M, Chang MC, Gholap A, Jadhav A, Hugh JC, Bigras G, Laurinavicius A, Augulis R, Levenson R, Todd A, Piper T, Virk S, van der Vegt B, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Nielsen TO, Rimm DL. Abstract P4-02-01: Analytical validation of an automated digital scoring protocol for Ki67: International multicenter collaboration study. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p4-02-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background/Goal: Ki67 expression has been a valuable prognostic marker in breast cancer, but has not seen broad adoption due to lack of standardization between institutions. Automation could represent a solution. Here we tested 3 automated digital image analysis (DIA) platforms including an open source platform to: (i) Investigate the reproducibility of Ki67 measurement across platforms with supervised classifiers performed by the same operator and by multiple operators. (ii) Compare accuracy of the 3 DIA platforms against outcome (prognostic potential). (iii) Assess inter-laboratory reproducibility of a calibrated DIA tool to evaluate Ki67 in breast cancer among 10 participating labs of the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group (IKWG).
Methods: The Mib-1 antibody (Dako) was used to detect Ki67 (dilution 1:100). HALO (H) (IndicaLabs), QuantCenter (QC) (3DHistech), QuPath (QP) (open-source software) digital image analysis (DIA) platforms were used to evaluate Ki67 expression. As a ground truth, we evaluated Ki67 LI with meticulous manual tissue segmentation using the Spectrum Webscope (SW) (Aperio). Calibration was performed using 30 ER+ breast cancer cases from phase 3 of the IKWG initiative where blocks were centrally cut and stained for Ki67. The inter-laboratory analysis was done with 10 participating laboratories divided into 2 groups where members within the same group were given the same set of images. The outcome cohort consisted of 149 breast cancer cases from the Yale Pathology archives in tissue microarray format. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure reproducibility with the pre-specified criterion for success being to exceed 0.80. Kaplan-Meier analysis supported with log-rank test was performed to assess prognostic potential.
Results: All 3 DIA platforms showed excellent inter-platform reproducibility (ICC: 0.933, CI: 0.879-0.966). Also, excellent reproducibility was found between all DIA platforms and the reference standard Ki67 values of SW (QP ICC: 0.970, CI: 0.936-0.986; H ICC: 0.968, CI: 0.933-0.985; QC ICC: 0.964, CI: 0.919-0.983). The intra-DIA reproducibility was also excellent for all platforms (QP ICC: 0.992, CI: 0.986-0.996; H ICC: 0.972, CI: 0.924-0.988; QC ICC: 0.978, CI: 0.932-0.991). Comparing each DIA against outcome, the hazard ratios were similar (QP=3.309, H=3.077, QC=3.731). The inter-operator reproducibility was particularly high (ICC: 0.962-0.995). As QP is open source software and also showed the lowest intra-DIA platform variability, we selected the QP platform to investigate inter-laboratory reproducibility among 10 IKWG labs. The different-section ICC across the 10 labs was 0.974 (CI: 0.954 - 0.986). The same-section ICC estimate was 0.984 (CI: 0.971-0.992) for group 1 and 0.978 (CI: 0.956-0.989) for group 2.
Conclusions: Our results showed outstanding reproducibility both within and between DIA platforms. We also found the platforms essentially indistinguishable with respect to prediction of breast cancer patient outcome. Automated Ki67 evaluation using a calibrated, open-source DIA platform (QuPath) met the pre-specified criterion of success in the multi-institutional setting. Assessment of clinical utility is planned.
Citation Format: Acs B, Leung SC, Pelekanou V, Bai Y, Martinez-Morilla S, Toki M, Chang MC, Gholap A, Jadhav A, Hugh JC, Bigras G, Laurinavicius A, Augulis R, Levenson R, Todd A, Piper T, Virk S, van der Vegt B, Hayes DF, Dowsett M, Nielsen TO, Rimm DL. Analytical validation of an automated digital scoring protocol for Ki67: International multicenter collaboration study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Acs
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - SC Leung
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - V Pelekanou
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Y Bai
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - S Martinez-Morilla
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Toki
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - MC Chang
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Gholap
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Jadhav
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - JC Hugh
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - G Bigras
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Laurinavicius
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - R Augulis
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - R Levenson
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Todd
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - T Piper
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - S Virk
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - B van der Vegt
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - DF Hayes
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Dowsett
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - TO Nielsen
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - DL Rimm
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Optra Technologies, NeoPro SEZ, BlueRidge, Hinjewadi, India; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine and National Center of Pathology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania; University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; Biomarkers & Companion Diagnostics Group, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|