1
|
Kyalwazi B, Yau C, Campbell MJ, Yoshimatsu TF, Chien AJ, Wallace AM, Forero-Torres A, Pusztai L, Ellis ED, Albain KS, Blaes AH, Haley BB, Boughey JC, Elias AD, Clark AS, Isaacs CJ, Nanda R, Han HS, Yung RL, Tripathy D, Edmiston KK, Viscusi RK, Northfelt DW, Khan QJ, Asare SM, Wilson A, Hirst GL, Lu R, Symmans WF, Yee D, DeMichele AM, van ’t Veer LJ, Esserman LJ, Olopade OI. Race, Gene Expression Signatures, and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With High-Risk Early Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2349646. [PMID: 38153734 PMCID: PMC10755617 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance There has been little consideration of genomic risk of recurrence by breast cancer subtype despite evidence of racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes. Objective To evaluate associations between clinical trial end points, namely pathologic complete response (pCR) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and race and examine whether gene expression signatures are associated with outcomes by race. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used data from the Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response With Imaging and Molecular Analysis 2 (I-SPY 2) multicenter clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with novel agents and combinations for patients with previously untreated stage II/III breast cancer. Analyses were conducted of associations between race and short- and long-term outcomes, overall and by receptor subtypes, and their association with 28 expression biomarkers. The trial enrolled 990 female patients between March 30, 2010, and November 5, 2016, with a primary tumor size of 2.5 cm or greater and clinical or molecular high risk based on MammaPrint or hormone receptor (HR)-negative/ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-positive subtyping across 9 arms. This data analysis was performed between June 10, 2021, and October 20, 2022. Exposure Race, tumor receptor subtypes, and genomic biomarker expression of early breast cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were pCR and DRFS assessed by race, overall, and by tumor subtype using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models. The interaction between 28 expression biomarkers and race, considering pCR and DRFS overall and within subtypes, was also evaluated. Results The analytic sample included 974 participants (excluding 16 self-reporting as American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, or multiple races due to small sample sizes), including 68 Asian (7%), 120 Black (12%), and 786 White (81%) patients. Median (range) age at diagnosis was 47 (25-71) years for Asian, 49 (25-77) for Black, and 49 (23-73) years for White patients. The pCR rates were 32% (n = 22) for Asian, 30% for Black (n = 36), and 32% for White (n = 255) patients (P = .87). Black patients with HR-positive/ERBB2-negative tumors not achieving pCR had significantly worse DRFS than their White counterparts (hazard ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.24-4.21; P = .01), with 5-year DRFS rates of 55% (n = 32) and 77% (n = 247), respectively. Black patients with HR-positive/ERBB2-negative tumors, compared with White patients, had higher expression of an interferon signature (mean [SD], 0.39 [0.87] and -0.10 [0.99]; P = .007) and, compared with Asian patients, had a higher mitotic score (mean [SD], 0.07 [1.08] and -0.69 [1.06]; P = .01) and lower estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor signature (mean [SD], 0.31 [0.90] and 1.08 [0.95]; P = .008). A transforming growth factor β signature had a significant association with race relative to pCR and DRFS, with a higher signature associated with lower pCR and worse DRFS outcomes among Black patients only. Conclusions and Relevance The findings show that women with early high-risk breast cancer who achieve pCR have similarly good outcomes regardless of race, but Black women with HR-positive/ERBB2-negative tumors without pCR may have worse DRFS than White women, highlighting the need to develop and test novel biomarker-informed therapies in diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverly Kyalwazi
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Christina Yau
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Toshio F. Yoshimatsu
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - A. Jo Chien
- Department of Hematology Oncology and Surgery, University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco
| | - Anne M. Wallace
- Division of Breast Surgery and the Comprehensive Breast Health Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| | | | - Lajos Pusztai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Kathy S. Albain
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Anne H. Blaes
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Barbara B. Haley
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | | | | | - Amy S. Clark
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | | | - Rita Nanda
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Hyo S. Han
- Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Rachel L. Yung
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Debasish Tripathy
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Rebecca K. Viscusi
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson
| | | | - Qamar J. Khan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Smita M. Asare
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, California
| | - Amy Wilson
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Ruixiao Lu
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, California
| | - William Fraser Symmans
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Douglas Yee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Angela M. DeMichele
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Laura J. van ’t Veer
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco
| | | | - Olufunmilayo I. Olopade
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rediti M, Fernandez-Martinez A, Venet D, Rothé F, Hoadley KA, Parker JS, Singh B, Campbell JD, Ballman KV, Hillman DW, Winer EP, El-Abed S, Piccart M, Di Cosimo S, Symmans WF, Krop IE, Salgado R, Loi S, Pusztai L, Perou CM, Carey LA, Sotiriou C. Immunological and clinicopathological features predict HER2-positive breast cancer prognosis in the neoadjuvant NeoALTTO and CALGB 40601 randomized trials. Nat Commun 2023; 14:7053. [PMID: 37923752 PMCID: PMC10624889 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42635-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The identification of prognostic markers in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy is crucial for treatment optimization in HER2-positive breast cancer, with the immune microenvironment being a key factor. Here, we investigate the complexity of B and T cell receptor (BCR and TCR) repertoires in the context of two phase III trials, NeoALTTO and CALGB 40601, evaluating neoadjuvant paclitaxel with trastuzumab and/or lapatinib in women with HER2-positive breast cancer. BCR features, particularly the number of reads and clones, evenness and Gini index, are heterogeneous according to hormone receptor status and PAM50 subtypes. Moreover, BCR measures describing clonal expansion, namely evenness and Gini index, are independent prognostic factors. We present a model developed in NeoALTTO and validated in CALGB 40601 that can predict event-free survival (EFS) by integrating hormone receptor and clinical nodal status, breast pathological complete response (pCR), stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels (%) and BCR repertoire evenness. A prognostic score derived from the model and including those variables, HER2-EveNT, allows the identification of patients with 5-year EFS > 90%, and, in those not achieving pCR, of a subgroup of immune-enriched tumors with an excellent outcome despite residual disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Rediti
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - David Venet
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Françoise Rothé
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Katherine A Hoadley
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Joel S Parker
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Jordan D Campbell
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Karla V Ballman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - David W Hillman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Martine Piccart
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Serena Di Cosimo
- Integrated biology platform unit, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - William Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ian E Krop
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Breast Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Charles M Perou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lisa A Carey
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mukhtar RA, Chau H, Woriax H, Piltin M, Ahrendt G, Tchou J, Yu H, Ding Q, Dugan CL, Sheade J, Crown A, Carr M, Wong J, Son J, Yang R, Chan T, Terando A, Alvarado M, Ewing C, Tonneson J, Tamirisa N, Gould R, Singh P, Godellas C, Larson K, Chiba A, Rao R, Sauder C, Postlewait L, Lee MC, Symmans WF, Esserman LJ, Boughey JC. Breast Conservation Surgery and Mastectomy Have Similar Locoregional Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results From 1462 Patients on the Prospective, Randomized I-SPY2 Trial. Ann Surg 2023; 278:320-327. [PMID: 37325931 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) increases rates of successful breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with breast cancer. However, some studies suggest that BCS after NAC may confer an increased risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR). We assessed LRR rates and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) in patients enrolled on I-SPY2 (NCT01042379), a prospective NAC trial for patients with clinical stage II to III, molecularly high-risk breast cancer. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate associations between surgical procedure (BCS vs mastectomy) and LRFS adjusted for age, tumor receptor subtype, clinical T category, clinical nodal status, and residual cancer burden (RCB). In 1462 patients, surgical procedure was not associated with LRR or LRFS on either univariate or multivariate analysis. The unadjusted incidence of LRR was 5.4% after BCS and 7.0% after mastectomy, at a median follow-up time of 3.5 years. The strongest predictor of LRR was RCB class, with each increasing RCB class having a significantly higher hazard ratio for LRR compared with RCB 0 on multivariate analysis. Triple-negative receptor subtype was also associated with an increased risk of LRR (hazard ratio: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.8-4.6, P < 0.0001), regardless of the type of operation. In this large multi-institutional prospective trial of patients completing NAC, we found no increased risk of LRR or differences in LRFS after BCS compared with mastectomy. Tumor receptor subtype and extent of residual disease after NAC were significantly associated with recurrence. These data demonstrate that BCS can be an excellent surgical option after NAC for appropriately selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita A Mukhtar
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Harrison Chau
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Hannah Woriax
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Mara Piltin
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Julia Tchou
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Hongmei Yu
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA
| | - Qian Ding
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA
| | - Catherine Lu Dugan
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jori Sheade
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Angelena Crown
- Department of Surgery, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael Carr
- Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
| | - Jasmine Wong
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jennifer Son
- Department of Surgery, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C
| | - Rachel Yang
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Theresa Chan
- Department of Surgery, Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Alicia Terando
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Cancer at Huntington Hospital Cancer Center, Pasadena, CA
| | - Michael Alvarado
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Cheryl Ewing
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jennifer Tonneson
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Nina Tamirisa
- Department of Surgery and Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rebekah Gould
- Department of Surgery and Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Puneet Singh
- Department of Surgery and Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Kelsey Larson
- Department of Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS
| | - Akiko Chiba
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Roshni Rao
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Candice Sauder
- Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA
| | | | | | - William Fraser Symmans
- Department of Surgery and Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Laura J Esserman
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen H, Ding Q, Khazai L, Zhao L, Damodaran S, Litton JK, Rauch GM, Yam C, Chang JT, Seth S, Lim B, Thompson AM, Mittendorf EA, Adrada B, Virani K, White JB, Ravenberg E, Song X, Candelaria R, Arun B, Ueno NT, Santiago L, Saleem S, Abouharb S, Murthy RK, Ibrahim N, Routbort MJ, Sahin A, Valero V, Symmans WF, Tripathy D, Wang WL, Moulder S, Huo L. PTEN in triple-negative breast carcinoma: protein expression and genomic alteration in pretreatment and posttreatment specimens. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231189422. [PMID: 37547448 PMCID: PMC10399250 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231189422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Recent advances have been made in targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in breast cancer. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is a key component of that pathway. Objective To understand the changes in PTEN expression over the course of the disease in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and whether PTEN copy number variation (CNV) by next-generation sequencing (NGS) can serve as an alternative to immunohistochemistry (IHC) to identify PTEN loss. Methods We compared PTEN expression by IHC between pretreatment tumors and residual tumors in the breast and lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 96 patients enrolled in a TNBC clinical trial. A correlative analysis between PTEN protein expression and PTEN CNV by NGS was also performed. Results With a stringent cutoff for PTEN IHC scoring, PTEN expression was discordant between pretreatment and posttreatment primary tumors in 5% of patients (n = 96) and between posttreatment primary tumors and lymph node metastases in 9% (n = 33). A less stringent cutoff yielded similar discordance rates. Intratumoral heterogeneity for PTEN loss was observed in 7% of the patients. Among pretreatment tumors, PTEN copy numbers by whole exome sequencing (n = 72) were significantly higher in the PTEN-positive tumors by IHC compared with the IHC PTEN-loss tumors (p < 0.0001). However, PTEN-positive and PTEN-loss tumors by IHC overlapped in copy numbers: 14 of 60 PTEN-positive samples showed decreased copy numbers in the range of those of the PTEN-loss tumors. Conclusion Testing various specimens by IHC may generate different PTEN results in a small proportion of patients with TNBC; therefore, the decision of testing one versus multiple specimens in a clinical trial should be defined in the patient inclusion criteria. Although a distinct cutoff by which CNV differentiated PTEN-positive tumors from those with PTEN loss was not identified, higher copy number of PTEN may confer positive PTEN, whereas lower copy number of PTEN would necessitate additional testing by IHC to assess PTEN loss. Trial registration NCT02276443.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Chen
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Qingqing Ding
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laila Khazai
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Li Zhao
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Senthil Damodaran
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer K. Litton
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gaiane M. Rauch
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clinton Yam
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey T. Chang
- Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sahil Seth
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bora Lim
- Department of Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alastair M. Thompson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Section of Breast Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elizabeth A. Mittendorf
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Beatriz Adrada
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kiran Virani
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason B. White
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elizabeth Ravenberg
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xingzhi Song
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rosalind Candelaria
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Banu Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Naoto T. Ueno
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lumarie Santiago
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sadia Saleem
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sausan Abouharb
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rashmi K. Murthy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nuhad Ibrahim
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Aysegul Sahin
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vicente Valero
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Debu Tripathy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stacy Moulder
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lei Huo
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abuhadra N, Sun R, Yam C, Rauch GM, Ding Q, Lim B, Thompson AM, Mittendorf EA, Adrada BE, Damodaran S, Virani K, White J, Ravenberg E, Sun J, Choi J, Candelaria R, Arun B, Ueno NT, Santiago L, Saleem S, Abouharb S, Murthy RK, Ibrahim N, Sahin A, Valero V, Symmans WF, Litton JK, Tripathy D, Moulder S, Huo L. Predictive Roles of Baseline Stromal Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Ki-67 in Pathologic Complete Response in an Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Prospective Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3275. [PMID: 37444385 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
High stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are associated with improved pathologic complete response (pCR) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesize that integrating high sTILs and additional clinicopathologic features associated with pCR could enhance our ability to predict the group of patients on whom treatment de-escalation strategies could be tested. In this prospective early-stage TNBC neoadjuvant chemotherapy study, pretreatment biopsies from 408 patients were evaluated for their clinical and demographic features, as well as biomarkers including sTILs, Ki-67, PD-L1 and androgen receptor. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to generate a computed response score to predict pCR. The pCR rate for the entire cohort was 41%. Recursive partitioning analysis identified ≥20% as the optimal cutoff for sTILs to denote 35% (143/408) of patients as having high sTILs, with a pCR rate of 59%, and 65% (265/408) of patients as having low sTILs, with a pCR rate of 31%. High Ki-67 (cutoff > 35%) was identified as the only predictor of pCR in addition to sTILs in the training set. This finding was verified in the testing set, where the highest computed response score encompassing both high sTILa and high Ki-67 predicted a pCR rate of 65%. Integrating Ki67 and sTIL may refine the selection of early stage TNBC patients for neoadjuvant clinical trials evaluating de-escalation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nour Abuhadra
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ryan Sun
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Clinton Yam
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Gaiane M Rauch
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Qingqing Ding
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Bora Lim
- Department of Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Alastair M Thompson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Section of Breast Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Mittendorf
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Beatriz E Adrada
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Senthil Damodaran
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kiran Virani
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jason White
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Elizabeth Ravenberg
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jia Sun
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jaihee Choi
- Department of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Rosalind Candelaria
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Banu Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Naoto T Ueno
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lumarie Santiago
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sadia Saleem
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sausan Abouharb
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Rashmi K Murthy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Nuhad Ibrahim
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Aysegul Sahin
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Vicente Valero
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - William Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jennifer K Litton
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Debu Tripathy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Stacy Moulder
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lei Huo
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marczyk M, Fu C, Lau R, Du L, Trevarton AJ, Sinn BV, Gould RE, Pusztai L, Hatzis C, Symmans WF. Assessment of stained direct cytology smears of breast cancer for whole transcriptome and targeted messenger RNA sequencing. Cancer Cytopathol 2023; 131:289-299. [PMID: 36650408 PMCID: PMC10614161 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rather than surgical resection, cytologic specimens are often used as first-line clinical diagnostic procedures due to higher safety, speed, and cost-effectiveness. Archival diagnostic cytology slides containing cancer can be equivalent to tissue biopsies for DNA mutation testing, but the accuracy of transcriptomic profiling by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is less understood. METHODS This study compares the results from whole transcriptome RNA-seq and a targeted RNA-seq assay of stained cytology smears (CS) versus matched tumor tissue samples preserved fresh-frozen (FF) and processed as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections. Cellular cytology scrapes from all 11 breast cancers were fixed and stained using three common protocols: Carnoy's (CS_C) or 95% ethanol (CS_E) fixation and then Papanicolaou stain or air-dried then methanol fixation and DiffQuik stain (CS_DQ). Agreement between samples was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. RESULTS Library yield for CS_DQ was too low, therefore it was not sequenced. The distributions of concordance correlation coefficient of gene expression levels in comparison to FF were comparable between CS_C and CS_E, but expression of genes enriched in stroma was lower in cytosmear samples than in FF or FFPE. Six signatures showed similar concordance to FF for all methods and two were slightly worse in CS_C and CS_E. Genomic signatures were highly concordant using targeted RNA-seq. The allele fraction of selected mutations calculated on cytosmear specimens was highly correlated with FF tissues using both RNA-seq methods. CONCLUSION RNA can be reliably extracted from cytology smears and is suitable for transcriptome profiling or mutation detection, except for signatures of tumor stroma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Marczyk
- Yale Cancer Center Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Chunxiao Fu
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rosanna Lau
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lili Du
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alexander J. Trevarton
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bruno V. Sinn
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebekah E. Gould
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Christos Hatzis
- Yale Cancer Center Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - William Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shinn EH, Busch BE, Jasemi N, Lyman CA, Toole JT, Richman SC, Symmans WF, Chavez-MacGregor M, Peterson SK, Broderick G. Network Modeling of Complex Time-Dependent Changes in Patient Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Treatment in ER+ Breast Cancer. Front Psychol 2022; 13:856813. [PMID: 35903747 PMCID: PMC9315289 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.856813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Early patient discontinuation from adjuvant endocrine treatment (ET) is multifactorial and complex: Patients must adapt to various challenges and make the best decisions they can within changing contexts over time. Predictive models are needed that can account for the changing influence of multiple factors over time as well as decisional uncertainty due to incomplete data. AtlasTi8 analyses of longitudinal interview data from 82 estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer patients generated a model conceptualizing patient-, patient-provider relationship, and treatment-related influences on early discontinuation. Prospective self-report data from validated psychometric measures were discretized and constrained into a decisional logic network to refine and validate the conceptual model. Minimal intervention set (MIS) optimization identified parsimonious intervention strategies that reversed discontinuation paths back to adherence. Logic network simulation produced 96 candidate decisional models which accounted for 75% of the coordinated changes in the 16 network nodes over time. Collectively the models supported 15 persistent end-states, all discontinued. The 15 end-states were characterized by median levels of general anxiety and low levels of perceived recurrence risk, quality of life (QoL) and ET side effects. MIS optimization identified 3 effective interventions: reducing general anxiety, reinforcing pill-taking routines, and increasing trust in healthcare providers. Increasing health literacy also improved adherence for patients without a college degree. Given complex regulatory networks’ intractability to end-state identification, the predictive models performed reasonably well in identifying specific discontinuation profiles and potentially effective interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen H. Shinn
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- *Correspondence: Eileen H. Shinn,
| | - Brooke E. Busch
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Neda Jasemi
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Cole A. Lyman
- Center for Clinical Systems Biology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - J. Tory Toole
- Center for Clinical Systems Biology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Spencer C. Richman
- Center for Clinical Systems Biology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - William Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Susan K. Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gordon Broderick
- Center for Clinical Systems Biology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Geyer CE, Sikov WM, Huober J, Rugo HS, Wolmark N, O'Shaughnessy J, Maag D, Untch M, Golshan M, Ponce Lorenzo J, Metzger O, Dunbar M, Symmans WF, Rastogi P, Sohn J, Young R, Wright GS, Harkness C, McIntyre K, Yardley D, Loibl S. Long-term efficacy and safety of addition of carboplatin with or without veliparib to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: 4-year follow-up data from BrighTNess, a randomized phase 3 trial. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:384-394. [PMID: 35093516 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary analyses of the phase 3 BrighTNess trial showed addition of carboplatin with/without veliparib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates with manageable acute toxicity in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Here, we report 4.5-year follow-up data from the trial. DESIGN Women with untreated stage II-III TNBC were randomized (2:1:1) to paclitaxel (weekly for 12 doses) plus either: (a) carboplatin (every 3 weeks for four cycles) plus veliparib (twice daily); (b) carboplatin plus veliparib placebo; or (c) carboplatin placebo plus veliparib placebo. All patients then received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) every 2‒3 weeks for four cycles. The primary endpoint was pCR. Secondary endpoints included event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Since the co-primary endpoint of increased pCR with carboplatin plus veliparib with paclitaxel versus carboplatin with paclitaxel was not met, secondary analyses are descriptive. RESULTS Of 634 patients, 316 were randomized to carboplatin plus veliparib with paclitaxel, 160 to carboplatin with paclitaxel, and 158 to paclitaxel. With median follow-up of 4.5 years, the hazard ratio [HR] for EFS for carboplatin plus veliparib with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43‒0.92, P=0.02), but 1.12 (95% CI 0.72‒1.72, P=0.62) for carboplatin plus veliparib with paclitaxel versus carboplatin with paclitaxel. In post hoc analysis, HR for EFS was 0.57 (95% CI 0.36‒0.91, P=0.02) for carboplatin with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel. OS did not differ significantly between treatment arms, nor did rates of myelodysplastic syndromes, acute myeloid leukemia, or other secondary malignancies. CONCLUSION Improvement in pCR with addition of carboplatin was associated with long-term EFS benefit with a manageable safety profile, and without increasing the risk of second malignancies, while adding veliparib did not impact EFS. These findings support the addition of carboplatin to weekly paclitaxel followed by AC neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early stage TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C E Geyer
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - W M Sikov
- Women, Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, USA
| | - J Huober
- Breast Center Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - H S Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Hellen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - N Wolmark
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA; Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - D Maag
- AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA
| | - M Untch
- HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Golshan
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - J Ponce Lorenzo
- University General Hospital of Alicante, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - O Metzger
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M Dunbar
- AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - P Rastogi
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center/University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - J Sohn
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - R Young
- Division of Breast Oncology, The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Fort Worth, USA
| | - G S Wright
- Florida Cancer Specialists and Sarah Cannon Research Institute, New Port Richey, FL, USA
| | - C Harkness
- Hope Women's Cancer Centers, Asheville, NC, USA
| | - K McIntyre
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - D Yardley
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - S Loibl
- German Breast Group, c/o GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
El Bairi K, Haynes HR, Blackley E, Fineberg S, Shear J, Turner S, de Freitas JR, Sur D, Amendola LC, Gharib M, Kallala A, Arun I, Azmoudeh-Ardalan F, Fujimoto L, Sua LF, Liu SW, Lien HC, Kirtani P, Balancin M, El Attar H, Guleria P, Yang W, Shash E, Chen IC, Bautista V, Do Prado Moura JF, Rapoport BL, Castaneda C, Spengler E, Acosta-Haab G, Frahm I, Sanchez J, Castillo M, Bouchmaa N, Md Zin RR, Shui R, Onyuma T, Yang W, Husain Z, Willard-Gallo K, Coosemans A, Perez EA, Provenzano E, Ericsson PG, Richardet E, Mehrotra R, Sarancone S, Ehinger A, Rimm DL, Bartlett JMS, Viale G, Denkert C, Hida AI, Sotiriou C, Loibl S, Hewitt SM, Badve S, Symmans WF, Kim RS, Pruneri G, Goel S, Francis PA, Inurrigarro G, Yamaguchi R, Garcia-Rivello H, Horlings H, Afqir S, Salgado R, Adams S, Kok M, Dieci MV, Michiels S, Demaria S, Loi S. The tale of TILs in breast cancer: A report from The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:150. [PMID: 34853355 PMCID: PMC8636568 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00346-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in modern oncology has significantly improved survival in several cancer settings. A subgroup of women with breast cancer (BC) has immunogenic infiltration of lymphocytes with expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). These patients may potentially benefit from ICI targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 signaling axis. The use of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as predictive and prognostic biomarkers has been under intense examination. Emerging data suggest that TILs are associated with response to both cytotoxic treatments and immunotherapy, particularly for patients with triple-negative BC. In this review from The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group, we discuss (a) the biological understanding of TILs, (b) their analytical and clinical validity and efforts toward the clinical utility in BC, and (c) the current status of PD-L1 and TIL testing across different continents, including experiences from low-to-middle-income countries, incorporating also the view of a patient advocate. This information will help set the stage for future approaches to optimize the understanding and clinical utilization of TIL analysis in patients with BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid El Bairi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed Ist University, Oujda, Morocco.
| | - Harry R Haynes
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK
- Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Elizabeth Blackley
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey Shear
- Chief Information Officer, WISS & Company, LLP and President J. Shear Consulting, LLC-Ardsley, Ardsley, NY, USA
| | | | - Juliana Ribeiro de Freitas
- Department of Pathology and Legal Medicine, Medical School of the Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
| | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Medicine "I. Hatieganu", Cluj Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Masoumeh Gharib
- Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | | | - Indu Arun
- Department of Histopathology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India
| | - Farid Azmoudeh-Ardalan
- Department of Pathology, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Luciana Fujimoto
- Pathology and Legal Medicine, Amazon Federal University, Belém, Brazil
| | - Luz F Sua
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fundacion Valle del Lili, and Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad ICESI, Cali, Colombia
| | | | - Huang-Chun Lien
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Department of Histopathology, Manipal Hospitals Dwarka, New Delhi, India
| | - Marcelo Balancin
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Prerna Guleria
- Army Hospital Research and Referral, Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Emad Shash
- Breast Cancer Comprehensive Center, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - I-Chun Chen
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Veronica Bautista
- Department of Pathology, Breast Cancer Center FUCAM, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Bernardo L Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, corner Doctor Savage Road and Bophelo Road, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa
| | - Carlos Castaneda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, 15038, Peru
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru
| | - Eunice Spengler
- Departmento de Patologia, Hospital Universitario Austral, Pilar, Argentina
| | - Gabriela Acosta-Haab
- Department of Pathology, Hospital de Oncología Maria Curie, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Isabel Frahm
- Department of Pathology, Sanatorio Mater Dei, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Joselyn Sanchez
- Department of Research, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, 15038, Peru
| | - Miluska Castillo
- Department of Research, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, 15038, Peru
| | - Najat Bouchmaa
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), 43 150, Ben-Guerir, Morocco
| | - Reena R Md Zin
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, UKM Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Ruohong Shui
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Wentao Yang
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Karen Willard-Gallo
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Edith A Perez
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Elena Provenzano
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paula Gonzalez Ericsson
- Breast Cancer Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Eduardo Richardet
- Clinical Oncology Unit, Instituto Oncológico Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- India Cancer Research Consortium-ICMR, Department of Health Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Sandra Sarancone
- Department of Pathology, Laboratorio QUANTUM, Rosario, Argentina
| | - Anna Ehinger
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - David L Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - John M S Bartlett
- Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg and Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of Pathology, Matsuyama Shimin Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Stephen M Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA
| | - William Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rim S Kim
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology, RCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori and University of Milan, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Shom Goel
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Prudence A Francis
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Medical Oncology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Rin Yamaguchi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kurume University Medical Center, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hernan Garcia-Rivello
- Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Hugo Horlings
- Division of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Said Afqir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed Ist University, Oujda, Morocco
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Medical School, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marleen Kok
- Divisions of Medical Oncology, Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
O'Sullivan CC, Ballman KV, McCall L, Kommalapati A, Zemla T, Weiss A, Mitchell M, Blinder V, Tung NM, Irvin WJ, Lee M, Goetz MP, Symmans WF, Borges VF, Krop I, Carey LA, Partridge AH. Alliance A011801 (compassHER2 RD): postneoadjuvant T-DM1 + tucatinib/placebo in patients with residual HER2-positive invasive breast cancer. Future Oncol 2021; 17:4665-4676. [PMID: 34636255 PMCID: PMC8600597 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This report describes the rationale, purpose and design of A011801 (CompassHER2 RD), an ongoing prospective, multicenter, Phase III randomized trial. Eligible patients in the United States (US) and Canada with high-risk (defined as ER-negative and/or node-positive) HER2-positive (HER2+) residual disease (RD) after a predefined course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-directed treatment are randomized 1:1 to adjuvant T-DM1 and placebo, versus T-DM1 and tucatinib. Patients have also received adjuvant radiotherapy and/or endocrine therapy, if indicated per standard of care guidelines. The primary objective of the trial is to determine if the invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) with T-DM1 plus tucatinib is superior to iDFS with T-DM1 plus placebo; other outcomes of interest include overall survival (OS), breast cancer-free survival (BCFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), brain metastases-free survival (BMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Correlative biomarker, quality of life (QoL) and pharmacokinetic (PK) end points are also evaluated.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine/administration & dosage
- Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine/adverse effects
- Adult
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
- Brain Neoplasms/epidemiology
- Brain Neoplasms/prevention & control
- Brain Neoplasms/secondary
- Breast/pathology
- Breast/surgery
- Breast Neoplasms/mortality
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/therapy
- Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects
- Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods
- Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
- Disease-Free Survival
- Double-Blind Method
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Mastectomy
- Middle Aged
- Multicenter Studies as Topic
- Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control
- Neoplasm, Residual
- Oxazoles/administration & dosage
- Oxazoles/adverse effects
- Placebos/administration & dosage
- Placebos/adverse effects
- Prospective Studies
- Pyridines/administration & dosage
- Pyridines/adverse effects
- Quinazolines/administration & dosage
- Quinazolines/adverse effects
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis
- Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karla V Ballman
- Alliance Statistics & Data Center, Weil Cornell Medicine, NY 10065, USA
| | - Linda McCall
- Alliance Statistics & Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | | | - Tyler Zemla
- Alliance Statistics & Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Anna Weiss
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Melissa Mitchell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Victoria Blinder
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY 10065, USA
| | - Nadine M Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - William J Irvin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bon Secours Cancer Institute, Midlothian, VA, USA
| | - Myounghee Lee
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - William Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Virginia F Borges
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ian Krop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa A Carey
- Department of Medical Oncology, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yam C, Yen EY, Chang JT, Bassett RL, Alatrash G, Garber H, Huo L, Yang F, Philips AV, Ding QQ, Lim B, Ueno NT, Kannan K, Sun X, Sun B, Parra Cuentas ER, Symmans WF, White JB, Ravenberg E, Seth S, Guerriero JL, Rauch GM, Damodaran S, Litton JK, Wargo JA, Hortobagyi GN, Futreal A, Wistuba II, Sun R, Moulder SL, Mittendorf EA. Immune Phenotype and Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:5365-5375. [PMID: 34253579 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Increasing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) is associated with higher rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the presence of TILs does not consistently predict pCR, therefore, the current study was undertaken to more fully characterize the immune cell response and its association with pCR. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We obtained pretreatment core-needle biopsies from 105 patients with stage I-III TNBC enrolled in ARTEMIS (NCT02276443) who received NAT from Oct 22, 2015 through July 24, 2018. The tumor-immune microenvironment was comprehensively profiled by performing T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) IHC, multiplex immunofluorescence, and RNA sequencing on pretreatment tumor samples. The primary endpoint was pathologic response to NAT. RESULTS The pCR rate was 40% (42/105). Higher TCR clonality (median = 0.2 vs. 0.1, P = 0.03), PD-L1 positivity (OR: 2.91, P = 0.020), higher CD3+:CD68+ ratio (median = 14.70 vs. 8.20, P = 0.0128), and closer spatial proximity of T cells to tumor cells (median = 19.26 vs. 21.94 μm, P = 0.0169) were associated with pCR. In a multivariable model, closer spatial proximity of T cells to tumor cells and PD-L1 expression enhanced prediction of pCR when considered in conjunction with clinical stage. CONCLUSIONS In patients receiving NAT for TNBC, deep immune profiling through detailed phenotypic characterization and spatial analysis can improve prediction of pCR in patients receiving NAT for TNBC when considered with traditional clinical parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clinton Yam
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Er-Yen Yen
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey T Chang
- Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Roland L Bassett
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gheath Alatrash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Haven Garber
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lei Huo
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Fei Yang
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anne V Philips
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qing-Qing Ding
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bora Lim
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Naoto T Ueno
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kasthuri Kannan
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xiangjie Sun
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Baohua Sun
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Edwin Roger Parra Cuentas
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - William Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jason B White
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth Ravenberg
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sahil Seth
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer L Guerriero
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gaiane M Rauch
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Senthil Damodaran
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer K Litton
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gabriel N Hortobagyi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ryan Sun
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stacy L Moulder
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth A Mittendorf
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. .,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Litton JK, Beck JT, Jones JM, Andersen J, Blum JL, Mina LA, Brig R, Danso MA, Yuan Y, Abbattista A, Noonan K, Chakrabarti J, Czibere A, Symmans WF, Telli ML. Neoadjuvant talazoparib in patients with germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) mutation-positive, early HER2-negative breast cancer (BC): Results of a phase 2 study. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
505 Background: Talazoparib (TALA) is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved as monotherapy for treating adult patients (pts) with g BRCA1/2-mutated HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic BC. Methods: This phase 2, non-randomized, single-arm, open-label study (NCT03499353) evaluated the efficacy and safety of TALA in the neoadjuvant setting for pts with early g BRCA1/2-mutated HER2− BC. Primary endpoint was evaluation of pathologic complete response (pCR) as assessed by Independent Central Review (ICR) after completing 24 weeks of neoadjuvant TALA monotherapy 1 mg QD (0.75 mg for moderate renal impairment) followed by surgery. Secondary endpoints included pCR by investigator (INV) and residual cancer burden (RCB) by ICR (RCB: 0 [pCR], I [minimal], II [moderate], III [extensive]). The evaluable population included pts who received at least 80% of the TALA dose prescribed at treatment start and underwent breast surgery and pCR assessment, plus those who progressed before pCR could be assessed. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all pts who received at least 1 dose of TALA. Results: Of 61 pts treated with TALA (ITT and safety populations), 48 comprised the evaluable population. All pts had triple-negative BC. 60 pts had adenocarcinoma and 1 had squamous cell histology, with the following staging: I=20, II=27, III=14. Mean age was 44.6 years, mean duration of 4.5 wks since disease onset, mean duration of treatment of 23.3 wks, and mean overall relative dose intensity of 84.5% (ITT population). pCR (assessed by ICR and INV) and RCB (by ICR) for the evaluable and ITT populations are shown in the table below. Ten (16.4%) patients discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. One pt had a disruption of treatment as a result of COVID-19 restrictions, 2 pts for other reasons: to undergo surgery early and consent withdrawal; 9 patients received <80% dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported in 98.4% of pts (27.9% grade [G] 1, 23.0% G2, 45.9% G3, 1.6% G4); the most common were fatigue (78.7%; G1 54.1%; G2 21.3%; G3 3.3%), nausea (68.9%; G1 54.1%; G2 13.1%; G3 1.6%), and alopecia (57.4%; G1 54.1%; G2 3.3%). Three (4.9%) pts discontinued treatment due to AEs (G3 anemia [n=2] and G3 vertigo [n=1]) and continued on study. Conclusions: TALA monotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting was active and showed pCR rates comparable to those observed with combination anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens and was generally well tolerated. Clinical trial information: NCT03499353. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jay Andersen
- Compass Oncology, West Cancer Center, Tigard, OR
| | - Joanne Lorraine Blum
- Texas Oncology–Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology Network, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Raymond Brig
- Brig Center for Cancer Care and Survivorship, Knoxville, TN
| | | | - Yuan Yuan
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mayer IA, Zhao F, Arteaga CL, Symmans WF, Park BH, Burnette BL, Tevaarwerk AJ, Garcia SF, Smith KL, Mayer EL, Sikov WM, Rodler ET, Wagner LI, DeMichele A, Sparano JA, Wolff AC, Miller K. A randomized phase III post-operative trial of platinum-based chemotherapy (P) versus capecitabine (C) in patients (pts) with residual triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC): ECOG-ACRIN EA1131. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
605 Background: Pts with TNBC who have residual invasive disease (RD) after completion of NAC have a very high risk for recurrence, which is reduced by adjuvant capecitabine (C). Pre-clinical models support the use of platinum agents (P) in the TNBC basal subtype. EA1131 tested the hypothesis that invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) would not be inferior but improved in pts with basal subtype TNBC after NAC with the adjuvant use of a P instead of C (primary objective). Methods: Pts with clinical stage II/III TNBC post neoadjuvant taxane +/- anthracycline-based chemotherapy with at least 1 cm RD in the surgical specimen were randomized (1:1) to receive P (carboplatin or cisplatin once every 3 weeks for 4 cycles) or C (14/7d every 3 weeks for 6 cycles). TNBC subtype (basal vs. non-basal) was analyzed in the surgical specimen by PAM50. A non-inferiority design (non-inferiority margin of hazard ratio [HR] of 1.154) with superiority alternative (alternative HR of 0.754) was chosen, assuming a 4-year iDFS of 67% for the C arm. Non-inferiority was tested first. If non-inferiority was shown, a formal test for superiority of P compared to C would be conducted. Results: 401 participants were randomized to P or C between 2015 and 2020 (recruitment goal, 775), 310 (77%) had TNBC basal subtype disease (primary analysis population). Pts’ median age was 52 years, 71% were White and 19% Black. At diagnosis, most tumors were high grade (78%), T2 (59%), 47% N0, and 40% N1. Residual tumors were 37% ypT1, 44% ypT2, and 47% ypN0. Overall incidence of any toxicity was similar (83% with P, 80% with C), but grade 3 and 4 toxicities (no grade 5) were more common with P (25% vs 15%). After median follow-up of 18 months, 113 iDFS events (58% of full information) had occurred. 3-year iDFS for P arm was 40% (95%CI, 29%-51%) and 44% (95%CI, 32%-55%) for C arm. The HR for arms P/C was 1.09 (95% Repeated Confidence Interval, 0.62-1.90) and the probability of eventually rejecting the null of inferiority (i.e., conditional power) was 6%. The Data Safety and Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the trial at the 5th interim analysis in March 2021 since it was unlikely that the trial would be able to show non-inferiority or superiority of the P arm. Conclusions: Participants with TNBC with RD after NAC had a lower than expected 3-year iDFS regardless of study treatment. Available data show that it is very unlikely that the study would be able to establish non-inferiority of P to C. In addition, severe toxicities were more common with P. In pts with TNBC, particularly basal subtype, with at least 1 cm RD after NAC and high-risk of recurrence, adjuvant P use does not improve outcomes. Correlative analyses of RD tissue (NGS), circulating markers (ctDNA and CTC pre/post treatment), and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaires will now occur. Clinical trial information: NCT02445391.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ben Ho Park
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | - Sofia F. Garcia
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Karen L. Smith
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | - Angela DeMichele
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Joseph A. Sparano
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Antonio C. Wolff
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kathy Miller
- Indiana University Simon Cancer Center Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
O'Sullivan CCM, Ballman KV, McCall LM, Zemla TJ, Weiss A, Mitchell M, Blinder VS, Tung NM, Irvin WJ, Lee M, Goetz MP, Symmans WF, Borges VF, Krop IE, Partridge AH, Carey LA. A011801 (CompassHER2 RD): Postneoadjuvant T-DM1 + tucatinib/placebo in patients with residual HER2-positive invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.tps595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS595 Background: Patients (pts) with HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC) and invasive residual disease (RD) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) have a higher risk of relapse than pts with a pathologic complete response (pCR). Post neoadjuvant T-DM1 has improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), but pts with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative or nodal RD have suboptimal outcomes and recurrences in the central nervous system are a problem. More effective treatment strategies are needed. The CompassHER2 trials, EA1181 and A011801, leverage pCR to tailor post neoadjuvant therapy in HER2+ EBC. EA1181 is a NAT de-escalation trial of a taxane, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (THP) in clinical stage II-III HER2+ EBC; pts with a pCR complete HP +/- adjuvant radiation (RT) +/- endocrine therapy (ET). A011801 is an escalation trial for pts with high risk HER2+ RD after NAT, examining addition of the HER2 selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) tucatinib to adjuvant T-DM1. Methods: Eligibility and Intervention: Pts. with high-risk HER2+ RD (e.g. ER-,node-positive, or both) after a predefined course of neoadjuvant HER2-directed treatment are randomized 1:1 to adjuvant T-DM1+ placebo (pb), vs. T-DM1 and tucatinib with adjuvant RT +/- ET. Eligibility criteria include completion of ≥ 6 cycles of NAT, including ≥ 9 weeks of T and H +/- P. All chemotherapy (CT) must be completed preoperatively unless participating in EA1181 (̃15-30% enrollees); these pts must receive postoperative CT to complete ≥ 6 cycles prior to enrollment on A011801. Pts who received prior HER2-targeted TKIs or antibody-drug conjugates are ineligible. Objectives: The primary objective is to determine if iDFS is higher with addition of T-DM1 to tucatinib in pts with HER2+ EBC with RD after NAT; secondary endpoints include overall survival, breast cancer free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, brain metastases-free survival and disease-free survival. Correlative objectives include the association of i) tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TILs) levels in the primary tumor and RD with iDFS, ii) TILs with tucatinib benefit, iii) iDFS and circulating tumor cells (CTC) at serial timepoints and iv) the magnitude of benefit of tucatinib (iDFS) in pts with/without detectable pretreatment CTCs. Quality of life and pharmacokinetic endpoints will also be evaluated. Statistics: A011801 is a prospective, double-blind, randomized, phase III superiority trial; stratified by i) receipt of postoperative CT (Y/N), ii) hormone receptor-status (+/-),and iii) pathologic lymph node status (+/-). The study targets an absolute difference of 5% in iDFS (control vs. experimental arm 82% & 87%, HR = 0.7), with a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and power of 80%. The sample size is 981; target accrual = 1031 pts; activation and completion dates are 01/6/21 and ̃ 01/2028. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; Seagen Inc; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04457596 Clinical trial information: NCT04457596.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Anna Weiss
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Myounghee Lee
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Symmans WF, Du L, Hoskin TL, Anurag M, Ma CX, Bedrosian I, Hunt K, Ellis MJ, Suman VJ. Evaluation of sensitivity to endocrine therapy index (SET2,3) for response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) and subsequent prognosis. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
580 Background: Patients (pts) in Cohort A of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 (Alliance) trial of NET for cStage II-III breast cancer were randomized to anastrozole [ANA], letrozole [LET] or exemestane [EXE] for 16-18 weeks (wks). In Cohort B, pts chose between ANA and LET and switched to chemotherapy or surgery if a tumor biopsy after 2-4 wks of NET had Ki67 >10%. Treatments after surgery were not defined by the trial protocol. SET2,3 measures nonproliferation gene expression related to estrogen and progesterone receptors adjusting for a baseline prognostic index that combines clinical tumor and nodal stage and a 4-gene molecular subtype (RNA4) defined by ESR1, PGR, ERBB2 and AURKA. High SET2,3 in a pre-treatment biopsy using cStage information is defined as SET2,3 >1.77. Methods: 379 pts had gene expression data from a research tumor biopsy prior to NET (Agilent 44K microarrays). A bioinformatician blinded to pt treatment and clinical outcomes determined SET2,3. The trial statistician then examined the association between SET2,3 and pharmacodynamic response at 2-4 wks (N=141, Cohort B): Ki67 ≤10% and complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA Ki67 ≤2.7%); pathologic outcomes in pts who completed NET: ypStage 0/1 (N=329, Cohorts A&B), PEPI-0 rate (N=155, Cohort B); and event-free survival (EFS) post-registration (N=244, Cohorts A&B). We used Fisher’s exact tests to assess whether responses, and Cox modeling to evaluate whether EFS, differed with respect to SET2,3 status. Results: High SET2,3 in 48% of pts (183/379) was associated with older age (median: 66 vs 63 years; p=0.012); cStage II (95% vs 75%; p <0.001); and pre-NET Ki67 ≤10% (37% vs 20%; p< 0.001) in pts with low SET2,3. In Cohort B, pts with high SET2,3 had a higher rate of pharmacodynamic response in their tumor at wk 2-4 than pts with low SET2,3 (Table). In the subset of Cohort B pts with wk 2-4 Ki67 ≤10%, pre-treatment SET2,3 trended numerically higher in pts who achieved PEPI-0 score (p=0.049) but the proportion achieving PEPI-0 did not differ by SET2,3 high/low status (Table). EFS was significantly longer for pts with high SET2,3 than pts with low SET2,3 (HR[H/L]: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.34-0.80; p=0.003). Conclusions: An exploratory analysis of Z1031 data demonstrated that the rate of pharmacodynamic suppression of proliferation by NET at 2-4 wks was greater and EFS was longer for pts with breast cancer expressing high SET2,3 disease than pts with low SET2,3. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ; Clinical trial information: NCT00265759. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lili Du
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Cynthia X. Ma
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Kelly Hunt
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Matthew James Ellis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor Clinic, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Marczyk M, Mrukwa A, Yau C, Wolf DM, van 't Veer L, Esserman L, Symmans WF, Pusztai L. Treatment Efficacy Score (TES), a continuous residual cancer burden-based metric to compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy between trial arms in the I-SPY 2 trial. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
587 Background: Residual cancer burden (RCB) is a continuous score that captures the amount of residual cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and predicts disease recurrence and survival across all breast cancer subtypes. RCB score 0 corresponds to pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0, ypN0). We hypothesize that comparison of the distributions of RCB scores between randomized treatment arms of a trial could predict treatment effect on recurrence free survival better than comparison of pCR rates only. Methods: The cancer Treatment Efficacy Score (TES) compares efficacies of two treatments using non-continuous RCB results. We examined (i) area between cumulative distribution (ABC) functions; (ii) density ratio of RCB scores; and (iii) density difference of RCB scores from two treatments, to select the most efficient metric to compute TES. A random permutation procedure was used to estimate the p-value from each test. These methods were applied to data from the durvalumab/olaparib arm and corresponding controls of the I-SPY2 trial, separately by molecular subtype. In subsampling and simulation experiments we assessed robustness of results including power and false positive rate control under variable sample sizes to select the most robust TES metric. The other 11 experimental arms of I-SPY2 were used to assess the performance of the final metric. We calculated correlation between TES and (i) pCR rate difference, and 3- and 5-year (ii) event-free (EFS) and (iii) distant recurrence free survivals (DRFS). Results: RCB scores are multimodal and do not follow normal distribution.In simulated data ABC provided more stable results than the other methods, had good power, performed well with small sample sizes, resulted in low false positive rate, required the least computational time, and therfore was selected as the TES metric for validation in 11 arms of I-SPY2. We found a high correlation between difference in pCR rate and TES value across all molecular subtypes in each of the 11 trial arms (r = 0.92, p = 1.7e-8). There was also significant linear relationship between TES and survival estimates in EFS (r = 0.58, p = 9.3e-3 for 3-years survival; r = 0.62, p = 4.8e-3 for 5-years survival) and DRFS (r = 0.56, p = 1.2e-2 for 3-years survival; r = 0.54, p = 1.8e-2 for 5-years survival). Statistically significant TES score correlated significantly with higher benefit in 3-years survival (p = 9.7e-4 for EFS; p = 5.7e-3 for DRFS) and 5-years survival (p = 9.7e-4 for EFS; p = 3.0e-3 for DRFS). In most instances, this correlation with survival was higher than seen with pCR difference. Conclusions: TES is a novel more optimal metric to identify the more effective cytotoxic neoadjuvant regimen from the entire distribution of pathologic response that significantly correlates with event and recurrence free survival and may serve as a better surrogate than pCR rate difference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Mrukwa
- Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| | | | | | - Laura van 't Veer
- Agendia, and The University of California San Francisco, San Francsico, CA
| | - Laura Esserman
- University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Telli ML, Litton JK, Beck JT, Jones JM, Andersen J, Mina LA, Brig R, Danso MA, Yuan Y, Symmans WF, Abbattista A, Noonan K, Mata M, Laird D, Blum JL. Neoadjuvant talazoparib (TALA) in patients (pts) with germline BRCA1/2 (g BRCA1/2) mutation-positive, early HER2-negative breast cancer (BC): Exploration of tumor BRCA mutational status and zygosity and overall mutational landscape in a phase 2 study. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
554 Background: TALA is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved as monotherapy for adult pts with g BRCA1/2-mutated HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic BC. We report biomarker analyses from a phase 2, nonrandomized, single-arm, open-label study (NEOTALA; NCT03499353) evaluating the efficacy and safety of TALA in the neoadjuvant setting for pts with early g BRCA1/2-mutated HER2− BC. Efficacy and safety results are presented separately. Methods: The biomarker analysis population was all pts treated with TALA for whom biomarker results are available. To support molecular eligibility, blood was tested using BRCAnalysis CDx (Myriad Genetics). Baseline tumor tissue was retrospectively tested using FoundationOne CDx, with BRCA1/2 zygosity assessed using somatic-germline-zygosity (SGZ; Sun et al. JCO PO, 2018). Germline mutational status of 14 non- BRCA DNA damage response (DDR) genes was retrospectively assessed in baseline saliva samples using Ambry CustomNext-Cancer. Mutations were defined as known/likely pathogenic/deleterious variants, including copy number alterations (CNAs). Association between mutational status of MYC or RAD21 and primary endpoint pathological complete response (pCR) as per Independent Central Review was investigated with logistic regression. Results: Of 52 evaluable tumor samples from 61 treated pts, 39 (75%) and 13 (25%) pts exhibited BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, respectively; 1 (2%) pt exhibited mutations in both genes, and 1 (2%) pt had mutations in neither. BRCA loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was seen in 42/43 (98%) evaluable BRCA-mutant tumors. Of 45 pts evaluable centrally for both germline and tumor, 44/45 (98%) pts exhibited the same BRCA mutation in tumor as originally detected in germline, with the remaining pt exhibiting a g BRCA1 mutation, but lacking a tumor BRCA mutation. None of 49 saliva-evaluable pts exhibited non- BRCA germline DDR mutations. TP53 (51 [98%] pts) was the most frequently mutated gene in tumors. MYC and RAD21 (each 14 [27%] pts) were the most frequent CNAs. No evidence of association between mutational status of MYC or RAD21 and pCR was found (odds ratio=0.39, 95% CI 0.12-2.30). Based on a cutoff of ≥16%, genomic LOH was elevated in 24/27 (89%) tumors evaluable for both gLOH and pCR, precluding assessment of the potential association of gLOH high/low status with pCR. Conclusions: Tumor BRCA mutations were evident in nearly all pts in the biomarker analysis population, with BRCA LOH evident in all but 1 BRCA-mutated tumor. No pts had non- BRCA germline DDR gene mutations; tumor TP53 mutations were near-universal. MYC and RAD21 each exhibited CNAs in 27% of tumors, with no association with pCR. These results support the central role of BRCA mutations in tumor pathobiology in this indication. Clinical trial information: NCT03499353.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jay Andersen
- Compass Oncology, West Cancer Center, Tigard, OR
| | | | - Raymond Brig
- Brig Center for Cancer Care and Survivorship, Knoxville, TN
| | | | - Yuan Yuan
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Joanne Lorraine Blum
- Texas Oncology–Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, US Oncology Network, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yam C, Mittendorf EA, Sun R, Huo L, Damodaran S, Rauch GM, Candelaria RP, Adrada BE, Seth S, Symmans WF, Murthy RK, White JB, Ravenberg E, Clayborn A, Prabhakaran S, Valero V, Thompson AM, Tripathy D, Moulder SL, Litton JK. Neoadjuvant atezolizumab (atezo) and nab-paclitaxel (nab-p) in patients (pts) with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with suboptimal clinical response to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
592 Background: Neoadjuvant anti-PD-(L)1 therapy confers an improvement in pathological complete response (pCR) rate in unselected TNBC. However, given the potential for long-term morbidity from immune related adverse events (irAE), it is important to optimize the risk-benefit ratio for the use of these novel agents in the curative neoadjuvant setting. Suboptimal clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) by sonography is associated with low rates of pCR rate (2-5%, GeparTrio and Aberdeen trials). Here, we report the results of a single arm phase II study of atezo and nab-p as the second phase of NAT in pts with TNBC with suboptimal clinical response to AC (NCT02530489). Methods: Pts with stage I-III TNBC showing suboptimal response to 4 cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC), defined as disease progression or a <80% reduction in tumor volume by sonography, were eligible. Pts received atezo (1200mg IV, Q3 weeks x 4), and nab-p (100mg/m2 IV, Q1 week, x 12) as the second phase of NAT before undergoing surgery followed by adjuvant atezo (1200mg IV, Q3 weeks, x 4 cycles). This single arm, two-stage Gehan-type study was designed to detect an improvement in pCR from 5% to 20% in order to deem the regimen worthy of further study in a large, randomized, phase II/III trial; success was defined as pCR in 8 out of 37 pts enrolled. In a subset of pts, sufficient baseline tumor tissue was available for stromal TIL assessment (n=29). Results: 34 pts were enrolled from 2/2016-12/2020. Among the 33 pts who have completed NAT, the pCR rate was 30% (10/33, 95% CI: 16-49%) and the pCR/RCB-I rate was 42% (14/33, 95% CI: 25-61%). Clinicopathological characteristics are described in the table below. Treatment-related adverse events (all grades) occurring in ≥ 20% of pts include fatigue (73%), anemia (55%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (55%), neutropenia (48%), rash (42%), ALT elevation (39%), AST elevation (33%), nausea (30%), anorexia (24%), diarrhea (21%), myalgia (21%). Discontinuation of atezo due to irAEs occurred in 4 pts (12%, nephritis [n=2]; adrenal insufficiency [n=1]; hepatitis [n=1]); 2 of these pts had pCR. Conclusions: This study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating a promising signal of activity in this high risk pt population (pCR=30% vs 5% in historical controls). The 12% discontinuation rate due to irAEs confirms that further evaluation of a strategy administering immunotherapy only to pts with high risk disease not responding to AC warrants further investigation. Exploratory genomic and immunological correlative studies are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02530489. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clinton Yam
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Ryan Sun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lei Huo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Gaiane M Rauch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Sahil Seth
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Jason B White
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Alyson Clayborn
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Vicente Valero
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Debu Tripathy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Du L, Yau C, Brown-Swigart L, Gould R, Krings G, Hirst GL, Bedrosian I, Layman RM, Carter JM, Klein M, Venters S, Shad S, van der Noordaa M, Chien AJ, Haddad T, Isaacs C, Pusztai L, Albain K, Nanda R, Tripathy D, Liu MC, Boughey J, Schwab R, Hylton N, DeMichele A, Perlmutter J, Yee D, Berry D, Van't Veer L, Valero V, Esserman LJ, Symmans WF. Predicted sensitivity to endocrine therapy for stage II-III hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer before chemo-endocrine therapy. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:642-651. [PMID: 33617937 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We proposed that a test for sensitivity to the adjuvant endocrine therapy component of treatment for patients with stage II-III breast cancer (SET2,3) should measure transcription related to estrogen and progesterone receptors (SETER/PR index) adjusted for a baseline prognostic index (BPI) combining clinical tumor and nodal stage with molecular subtype by RNA4 (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and AURKA). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with clinically high-risk, hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer received neoadjuvant taxane-anthracycline chemotherapy, surgery with measurement of residual cancer burden (RCB), and then adjuvant endocrine therapy. SET2,3 was measured from pre-treatment tumor biopsies, evaluated first in an MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) cohort (n = 307, 11 years' follow-up, U133A microarrays), cut point was determined, and then independent, blinded evaluation was carried out in the I-SPY2 trial (n = 268, high-risk MammaPrint result, 3.8 years' follow-up, Agilent-44K microarrays, NCI Clinical Trials ID: NCT01042379). Primary outcome measure was distant relapse-free survival. Multivariate Cox regression models tested prognostic independence of SET2,3 relative to RCB and other molecular prognostic signatures, and whether other prognostic signatures could substitute for SETER/PR or RNA4 components of SET2,3. RESULTS SET2,3 added independent prognostic information to RCB in the MDACC cohort: SET2,3 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, P = 0.004] and RCB (HR 1.77, P < 0.001); and the I-SPY2 trial: SET2,3 (HR 0.27, P = 0.031) and RCB (HR 1.68, P = 0.008). SET2,3 provided similar prognostic information irrespective of whether RCB-II or RCB-III after chemotherapy, and in both luminal subtypes. Conversely, RCB was most strongly prognostic in cancers with low SET2,3 status (MDACC P < 0.001, I-SPY2 P < 0.001). Other molecular signatures were not independently prognostic; they could effectively substitute for RNA4 subtype within the BPI component of SET2,3, but they could not effectively substitute for SETER/PR index. CONCLUSIONS SET2,3 added independent prognostic information to chemotherapy response (RCB) and baseline prognostic score or subtype. Approximately 40% of patients with clinically high-risk HR+/HER2- disease had high SET2,3 and could be considered for clinical trials of neoadjuvant endocrine-based treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Du
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - C Yau
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - L Brown-Swigart
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - R Gould
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - G Krings
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - G L Hirst
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - I Bedrosian
- Department of Breast Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - R M Layman
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - J M Carter
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - M Klein
- Department of Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - S Venters
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - S Shad
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | | | - A J Chien
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - T Haddad
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - C Isaacs
- Department of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, USA
| | - L Pusztai
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - K Albain
- Department of Medicine, Loyola University, Chicago, USA
| | - R Nanda
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - D Tripathy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - M C Liu
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - J Boughey
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - R Schwab
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - N Hylton
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - A DeMichele
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, San Philadelphia, USA
| | | | - D Yee
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - D Berry
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - L Van't Veer
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - V Valero
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - L J Esserman
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - W F Symmans
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Francisco, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Shinn EH, Broderick G, Fellman B, Johnson A, Wieland E, Moulder S, Symmans WF. Simulating Time-Dependent Patterns of Nonadherence by Patients With Breast Cancer to Adjuvant Oral Endocrine Therapy. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2020; 3:1-9. [PMID: 31002563 PMCID: PMC6873985 DOI: 10.1200/cci.18.00091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Nearly 40% of patients with breast cancer discontinue their adjuvant oral endocrine treatment (ET). We measured discontinuation rates of ET at a comprehensive cancer center. We then used an iterative approach to model patterns of determinants associated with discontinuation of ET. METHODS Patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer receiving active adjuvant ET were approached by nurse practitioners to complete an anonymous survey at one time point. We simulated a prospective model by iteratively regressing adverse effects onto adherence status across windowed time periods of 2 to 3 consecutive years, bootstrapping the smaller group of nonadherent patients and subsampling the larger adherent group. RESULTS From February to April 2013, 216 participants were enrolled in the study. Forty patients (18.5%) reported that they had discontinued ET during the first 5 years of ET, and an additional four patients (1.9%) missed > 20% of their doses. Using two-sided significance tests, simulations showed that all 13 ET adverse effects and reasons for discontinuation were significantly related to discontinuation at some time point during ET. Worry about ET cost (odds ratio [OR], 1.79), emotional distress (OR, 1.72), and bone and joint pain (OR, 1.69) were the three most impactful reasons for discontinuation, with varying patterns of influence over time. CONCLUSION These analyses provide preliminary evidence that there are varying patterns of discontinuation of ET. Although some reasons for discontinuation exerted a steady influence over the 6-year ET trajectory (ie, bone and joint pain), other reasons, such as cost, cognitive complaints, and general dislike of pills, became more important in the later years of ET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen H Shinn
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Bryan Fellman
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Stacy Moulder
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abuhadra N, Sun R, Litton JK, Rauch GM, Thompson AM, Lim B, Adrada BE, Mittendorf EA, White JB, Ravenberg E, Damodaran S, Candelaria RP, Arun B, Ueno NT, Santiago L, Murthy RK, Ibrahim NK, Symmans WF, Moulder SL, Huo L. Prognostic impact of high stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) in the absence of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in early stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
583 Background: Pathologic complete response is an excellent surrogate for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in TNBC. High sTIL is associated with improved pCR rates in TNBC. Recent data suggest that high sTIL is also associated with improved outcomes in patients who received no chemotherapy for early stage TNBC (Park, Annals of Oncology, 2019). Thus, we hypothesized that high sTIL may have prognostic impact in patients who do not achieve pCR to NAT. Methods: Pretreatment core biopsies from 182 patients with early-stage TNBC enrolled on the ARTEMIS trial (NCT02276443) were evaluated for sTIL by H&E. Patients were stratified according to sTIL (low < 30%, and high > 30%) and pCR (patients with pCR vs. no pCR). The primary outcome measure was DFS, defined from the date of diagnosis to the first local recurrence, distant metastases or death. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used. During follow-up 33 events for DFS were observed. Results: Among subjects who achieve pCR, DFS was excellent regardless of sTIL status and significantly better than those without pCR (p < 0.05). However, patients with high sTIL and no pCR demonstrated significantly worse DFS compared to all subjects having pCR (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.76, p = 0.02). Additionally, we did not find a significant difference between high and low sTIL patients who did not achieve pCR. Conclusions: In early TNBC receiving NAT, for patients failing to achieve pCR, high sTIL was not associated with improved DFS; outcomes were comparable to those with low sTIL without pCR. Thus, high sTIL at baseline does not appear to confer an intrinsic prognostic benefit in the absence of pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nour Abuhadra
- MD Anderson Hematology/Oncology Fellowship, Houston, TX
| | - Ryan Sun
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Gaiane M Rauch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Bora Lim
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Jason B White
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Senthil Damodaran
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Banu Arun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Naoto T. Ueno
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Lei Huo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lim B, Seth S, Huo L, Layman RM, Valero V, Thompson AM, White JB, Litton JK, Damodaran S, Candelaria RP, Arun B, Rauch GM, Murthy RK, Ding Q, Symmans WF, Zhao L, Zhang J, Tripathy D, Moulder SL, Ueno NT. Comprehensive profiling of androgen receptor-positive (AR+) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients (pts) treated with standard neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) +/- enzalutamide. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
517 Background: The luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype of TNBC has a low pathologic complete response (pCR) rate after NAT. We determined the pCR rate of the enzalutamide and paclitaxel (ZT) regimen for pts with anthracycline-insensitive AR+ TNBC (NCT02689427), and related biomarkers. Methods: ARTEMIS (NCT02276443) is a non-randomized trial to determine if NAT can be used to personalized therapy. Pts received 4 cycles of doxorubicin-based NAT (AC). Pts with insensitive disease by imaging were offered clinical trials as the second phase of NAT based upon molecular profiling of pre-treatment biopsies. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of AR+≥10% was the threshold for selecting ZT (enzalutamide 160 or 120 mg PO qD + paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 qW for 12 cycles). pCR was determined by surgery after NAT. Trial had two-stage Phase II design, and we report the completed first stage. We evaluated the concordance between Vanderbilt LAR subtype by molecular profiling (microarray and RNAseq) and IHC %AR+ cells. Frequency of PI3K pathway alterations within the LAR subtype was assessed. Results: 267 pts had tumors profiled by IHC, 220 by microarray, 187 by RNAseq and 197 by whole exome sequencing. 96 pts had post-AC RNAseq. LAR scores from both RNAseq and microarray profiling (n = 139) were highly concordant (R = 0.89, P < 0.001) and identified ~10% of TNBCs tested as LAR. The %AR+ cells from IHC correlated with LAR subtype scores according to RNAseq (R = 0.6, P < 0.001), with a cut-point of ≥30% AR+ having the best concordance with LAR subtype. Unlike other subtypes, by serial profiling, LAR TNBCs did not change subtype signatures after exposure to AC. LAR TNBCs had low rates of pCR (23%) and high rates of PI3K pathway activating aberrations (85%); however PI3K aberrations did not correlate with pCR. Seventeen patients with AC-insensitive TNBC received ZT. Five of 15 patients (33.3%) had responses (pCR or RCB-I). Toxicities are Grade (Gr) 4 syncope (n = 1), Gr3 abnormal liver function (n = 2), Gr3 neutropenia (n = 4). IHC & LAR subtype scores did not statistically associate with response to ZT (P = 0.8, P = 0.9). However, all responders to ZT had an upregulated androgen response pathway (ssGSEA Z > 1) as measured by transcriptomic analysis in pre-treatment biopsies analysis (P = 0.05, ppv = 0.56, npv = 1). Conclusions: The LAR TNBC subtype has a low pCR rate to NAT. Among pts with AC-insensitive TNBC, baseline upregulated androgen response pathway and LAR subtype may benefit from the ZT regimen, potentially by PI3K targeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02689427 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bora Lim
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sahil Seth
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lei Huo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rachel M. Layman
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Vicente Valero
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Jason B White
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Senthil Damodaran
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Banu Arun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gaiane M Rauch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Qingqing Ding
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Li Zhao
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jianjun Zhang
- Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Department of Genomic Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Debu Tripathy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Naoto T. Ueno
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yam C, Alatrash G, Yen EY, Garber H, Philips AV, Huo L, Yang F, Bassett RL, Sun X, Parra Cuentas ER, Symmans WF, Seth S, White JB, Rauch GM, Damodaran S, Litton JK, Wargo JA, Hortobagyi GN, Moulder SL, Mittendorf EA. Immune phenotype and response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
509 Background: In TNBC patients (pts) receiving NAST, increasing tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is associated with higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. However, since the presence of TIL do not consistently predict pCR, the current study was undertaken to more fully characterize the immune cell response and its association with pCR. Methods: T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunofluorescence were performed on prospectively collected pre-NAST tumor samples from 98 pts with stage I-III TNBC enrolled in ARTEMIS (NCT: 02276443). TCR clonality was calculated using Shannon’s entropy. PD-L1+ was defined as ≥1% immune cell staining. Response to NAST was defined using the residual cancer burden (RCB) index. Associations between TCR clonality, immune phenotype, and response were examined with the Wilcoxon rank sum test, Spearman’s rank correlation and multivariable logistic regression using stepwise elimination (threshold p > 0.2), as appropriate. Results: The pCR rate was 39% (38/98). pCR was associated with higher TCR clonality (median = 0.2 [in pts with pCR] vs 0.1 [in pts with residual disease], p = 0.05). Notably, the association between pCR and higher TCR clonality was observed in pts with ≥5% TIL (n = 61; p = 0.05) but not in pts with < 5% TIL (n = 37; p = 0.87). Among pts with ≥5% TIL, TCR clonality emerged as the only independent predictor of response in a multivariable model of tumor immune characteristics (odds ratio/0.1 increase in TCR clonality: 3.0, p = 0.021). PD-L1+ status was associated with higher TCR clonality (median = 0.2 [in PD-L1+] vs 0.1 [in PD-L1-], p = 0.004). Higher TCR clonality was associated with higher CD3+ (rho = 0.32, p = 0.0018) and CD3+CD8+ (rho = 0.33, p = 0.0013) infiltration but lower expression of PD-1 on CD3+ (rho = -0.24, p = 0.021) and CD3+CD8+ cells (rho = -0.21, p = 0.037). Conclusions: In TNBC, a more clonal T cell population is associated with an immunologically active microenvironment (higher CD3+ and CD3/8+ T cell; lower PD-1+CD3+ and PD-1+CD3/8+ T cell; PD-L1+) and favorable response to NAST, especially in pts with ≥5% TIL, suggesting a role for deep immune phenotyping in further refining the predictive value of TILs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clinton Yam
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gheath Alatrash
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Er-Yen Yen
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Haven Garber
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Anne V. Philips
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lei Huo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Fei Yang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Xiangjie Sun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Sahil Seth
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jason B White
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gaiane M Rauch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Senthil Damodaran
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hudeček J, Voorwerk L, van Seijen M, Nederlof I, de Maaker M, van den Berg J, van de Vijver KK, Sikorska K, Adams S, Demaria S, Viale G, Nielsen TO, Badve SS, Michiels S, Symmans WF, Sotiriou C, Rimm DL, Hewitt SM, Denkert C, Loibl S, Loi S, Bartlett JMS, Pruneri G, Dillon DA, Cheang MCU, Tutt A, Hall JA, Kos Z, Salgado R, Kok M, Horlings HM. Application of a risk-management framework for integration of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in clinical trials. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020; 6:15. [PMID: 32436923 PMCID: PMC7217941 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-0155-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are a potential predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). To incorporate sTILs into clinical trials and diagnostics, reliable assessment is essential. In this review, we propose a new concept, namely the implementation of a risk-management framework that enables the use of sTILs as a stratification factor in clinical trials. We present the design of a biomarker risk-mitigation workflow that can be applied to any biomarker incorporation in clinical trials. We demonstrate the implementation of this concept using sTILs as an integral biomarker in a single-center phase II immunotherapy trial for metastatic TNBC (TONIC trial, NCT02499367), using this workflow to mitigate risks of suboptimal inclusion of sTILs in this specific trial. In this review, we demonstrate that a web-based scoring platform can mitigate potential risk factors when including sTILs in clinical trials, and we argue that this framework can be applied for any future biomarker-driven clinical trial setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hudeček
- Department of Research IT, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie Voorwerk
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje van Seijen
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Nederlof
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel de Maaker
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jose van den Berg
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Karolina Sikorska
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Department of Medicine, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY USA
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY USA
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- International Breast Cancer Study Group Central Pathology Office, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Torsten O. Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada
| | - Sunil S. Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN USA
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Service de Biostatistique et d’Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, CESP, Université-Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- CESP, Fac. de médecine - Univ. Paris-Sud, Fac. de médecine - UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, U-CRC, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David L. Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Stephen M. Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Research and Clinical Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - John M. S. Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON Canada
- IGMM, Edinburgh, UK
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IRCCS Fondazion - Instituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Deborah A. Dillon
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Maggie C. U. Cheang
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey, UK
| | - Andrew Tutt
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Division of Research and Clinical Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marleen Kok
- Division of Tumor Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo M. Horlings
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Seth S, Huo L, Vasaikar S, Rauch G, Lim B, White J, Adrada B, Piwnica-Worms H, Ueno NT, Thompson AM, Mittendorf E, Tripathy D, Litton JK, Symmans WF, Draetta G, Futreal A, Chang J, Moulder S. Abstract P2-16-08: Longitudinal response and selection under neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Profiling results from a randomized, TNBC enrolling trial to confirm molecular profiling improves survival (ARTEMIS; NCT02276443). Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p2-16-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The heterogeneity of TNBC results in a spectrum of responses to NAST: 30-40% of patients (pts) have pathologic complete response (pCR) with excellent prognosis. Several methods have been used to measure and evaluate residual disease, including ultrasound, MRI scans, histo-pathology and transcriptional profiling (Seth, ASCO 2019). In addition, we hypothesize that integrative understanding of sub-clonal selection and changes in molecular pathways would lead to better stratification as a biomarker for chemotherapy, and subsequent targeted therapy trials. Methods: Pts with stage I-III TNBC began a planned 4 cycles of Adriamycin-based chemo (AC). Biopsies were performed pre (mandatory) and post (optional) AC. Volumetric change by ultrasound (VUS) at completion of AC (or progression) was calculated. Pts with sensitive disease received subsequent taxane-based (T) therapy. Pts with insensitive disease were offered phase II trials. Pathologic response was assessed at surgical resection in 55 pts. Matched samples, pre and post AC (N = 55 pts) underwent transcriptomic and genomic profiling. Samples were classified into six previously identified ARTEMIS subtypes of TNBC (ART-Type) and immune deconvolution and estimation was performed using RNA-Seq profiles. Somatic mutations and copy-number changes were evaluated using, Mutect, FACETS, and PyClone. Results: Predominately, tumors reacted to AC in 4 different patterns with variation in immune and EMT related pathways. Enrichment of EMT (Group 4) was associated with poor prognosis and higher RCB (10.3% vs 42% pCR rates, p<0.05). The global changes in transcription led to ART-Type switching in all subtypes (44% of pts), except LAR subtype. MYC amplification was more prevalent (40%) in Group 4, associated with higher EMT and poor prognosis than other groups (28%). Phylogenetic evaluation of selection revealed, sub-clonal selection in 22% of evaluable cases with pre and post biopsies. Conclusions: Molecular profiling of longitudinal TNBC samples reveals distinct response patterns in tumors and their micro-environments upon treatment with AC. Integrative analysis of genomic and transcriptomic changes can lead to better stratification of response to NAST. These patterns were indicative of pathologic response in this cohort; however, they require validation in a separate cohort.
Citation Format: Sahil Seth, Lei Huo, Suhas Vasaikar, Gaiane Rauch, Bora Lim, Jason White, Beatriz Adrada, Helen Piwnica-Worms, Naoto T Ueno, Alastair Mark Thompson, Elizabeth Mittendorf, Debashish Tripathy, Jennifer Keating Litton, William Fraser Symmans, Giulio Draetta, Andrew Futreal, Jeffrey Chang, Stacy Moulder. Longitudinal response and selection under neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Profiling results from a randomized, TNBC enrolling trial to confirm molecular profiling improves survival (ARTEMIS; NCT02276443) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-16-08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lei Huo
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Bora Lim
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sinn BV, Weber KE, Schmitt WD, Fasching PA, Symmans WF, Blohmer JU, Karn T, Taube ET, Klauschen F, Marmé F, Schem C, Stickeler E, Ataseven B, Huober J, von Minckwitz G, Seliger B, Denkert C, Loibl S. Human leucocyte antigen class I in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: association with response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res 2019; 21:142. [PMID: 31829264 PMCID: PMC6907189 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-019-1231-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical application of cancer immunotherapy requires a better understanding of tumor immunogenicity and the tumor microenvironment. HLA class I molecules present antigens to CD8+ cytotoxic cells. Their loss or downregulation is frequently found in tumors resulting in reduced T cell responses and worse prognosis. Methods We evaluated HLA class I heavy chain expression by immunohistochemistry in 863 biopsies (GeparTrio trial). Patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant endocrine treatment if tumors were hormone receptor-positive (HR+). In parallel, the expression of HLA-A was analyzed using a microarray cohort of 320 breast cancer patients from the MD Anderson Cancer Center. We evaluated its association with clinical outcome, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and immune cell metagenes. Results In HR+/HER2− breast cancer, HLA class I heavy chain expression was associated with increased TILs and better response to chemotherapy (7% vs. 14% pCR rate, P = 0.029), but worse disease-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 1.6 (1.1–2.4); P = 0.024). The effect was significant in a multivariate model adjusted for clinical and pathological variables (HR 1.7 (1.1–2.6); P = 0.016) and was confirmed by analysis of HLA-A in a microarray cohort. HLA-A was correlated to most immune cell metagenes. There was no association with response or survival in triple-negative or HER2+ disease. Conclusions The study confirms the negative prognostic role of lymphocytes in HR+ breast cancer and points at a complex interaction between chemotherapy, endocrine treatment, and tumor immunogenicity. The results point at a subtype-specific and potentially treatment-specific role of tumor-immunological processes in breast cancer with different implications in triple-negative and hormone receptor-positive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Valentin Sinn
- Department of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt - Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany. .,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
| | | | - Wolfgang Daniel Schmitt
- Department of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt - Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - William Fraser Symmans
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Cancer, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt - Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Karn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Eliane Tabea Taube
- Department of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt - Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frederick Klauschen
- Department of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt - Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frederik Marmé
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Schem
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.,Mammazentrum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Department of Gynecology and Breast Medical Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Barbara Seliger
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Department of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt - Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hurvitz SA, Martin M, Jung KH, Huang CS, Harbeck N, Valero V, Stroyakovskiy D, Wildiers H, Campone M, Boileau JF, Beckmann MW, Afenjar K, Spera G, Lopez Valverde V, Song C, Boulet T, Sparano JA, Symmans WF, Thompson AM, Slamon DJ. Neoadjuvant trastuzumab (H), pertuzumab (P), and chemotherapy versus trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and P in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC): Final outcome results from the phase III KRISTINE study. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
500 Background: KRISTINE compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus dual HER2- blockade (HP) with T-DM1 plus P (T-DM1+P), a targeted regimen that omits standard chemotherapy. T-DM1+P resulted in a lower pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, but a more favorable safety profile. Here we present the final outcomes from KRISTINE. Methods: KRISTINE (NCT02131064) was a randomized study of T-DM1+P versus docetaxel, carboplatin, and H plus P (TCHP). Patients with HER2-positive stage II–III BC received 6 cycles of neoadjuvant T-DM1+P or TCHP q3w. Patients receiving T-DM1+P continued adjuvant T-DM1+P; patients receiving TCHP received adjuvant HP, for 12 cycles in each arm. Patients in the T-DM1+P arm without pCR were encouraged to receive standard adjuvant chemotherapy before adjuvant T-DM1+P. Secondary endpoints, analyzed with descriptive statistics, included event-free survival (EFS; all events pre- and post-surgery), invasive disease-free survival (IDFS; invasive events post-surgery), overall survival and safety. Results: At median follow-up of 37 months, EFS favored TCHP (HR = 2.61 [95% CI: 1.36–4.98]), due to more locoregional progression events in the T-DM1+P arm before surgery (6.7% vs 0; Table). pCR was associated with reduced risk of an IDFS event (HR = 0.24 [95% CI: 0.09– 0.60]) regardless of treatment arm. There were 5 deaths (2.3%) in the TCHP arm and 6 (2.7%) in the T-DM1+P arm. There were more grade ≥3 AEs with TCHP but a higher rate of AEs leading to treatment discontinuation with T-DM1+P. Conclusions: EFS numerically favors TCHP due to locoregional progression events with T-DM1+P prior to surgery. T-DM1+P was associated with fewer grade ≥3 AEs but increased treatment discontinuation. Clinical trial information: NCT02131064. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara A. Hurvitz
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Miguel Martin
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Ciberonc, Geicam, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Kyung Hae Jung
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chiun-Sheng Huang
- National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Vicente Valero
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Mario Campone
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, René Gauducheau, St Herblain, France
| | | | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Gonzalo Spera
- Translational Research In Oncology, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | | | | | | | - Joseph A. Sparano
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | | | | | - Dennis J. Slamon
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Seth S, Crespo J, Huo L, Thompson AM, Mittendorf EA, Hess KR, Litton JK, Rauch GM, Adrada BE, Damodaran S, Candelaria RP, Arun B, Yang WT, Santiago L, Murthy RK, Sahin AA, Symmans WF, Moulder SL, Ueno NT, Lim B. Evaluation of predictive biomarkers for AR therapy and to identify the LAR subtype of TNBC. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
595 Background: Androgen-receptor-like (LAR) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype identified using Vanderbilt’s molecular signature. LAR subtype has the lowest pCR rate for NACT among all TNBC subtypes (10% vs. 28% for TNBC in general). We launched a clinical trial to determine the effectiveness of enzalutamide and paclitaxel (ZT) in improving this poor chemo. response in the neoadjuvant setting for pts with anthracycline-refractory, androgen receptor (AR)+ TNBC (NCT02689427). However, we do not yet have a robust predictive biomarker to detect an activated AR pathway and have not seen a robust correlation between molecular LAR subtype and AR IHC staining intensity. Methods: Molecular profiling and immunohistochemical analysis of key biomarkers (LAR, Ki67, and vimentin) was performed for all pts enrolled in A Randomized triple negative breast cancer enrolling Trial to Confirm Molecular Profiling Improves Survival (ARTEMIS; NCT02276443). Patients receive 4 cycles of AC, followed by an experimental arm or standard taxane, tailored using nuclear IHC staining. IHC staining of ≥30% AR+ was used as a threshold for selection for enzalutamide combination arm. We evaluated the concordance between LAR-subtype using molecular profiling vs % AR+ cells via IHC. Results: As part of the clinical trial, tumors with ≥30% AR+ cells were classified as LAR. In addition, we used RNA profiling to assign Vanderbilt subtype scores, resulting in classification of 15 tumors as LAR+. We observed a significant correlation (r=0.75) between LAR score and %AR+ cells, with 13 of 15 LAR tumors having ≥30% AR+ cells. Among patients with high % of AR+ tumor cells, 11 received enzalutamide, with 43% (3/7) having responses (pCR or RCB-I). Conclusions: Comparison on numerical scores for Vanderbilt subtype and IHC scores suggests ≥30% AR+ IHC staining as the threshold (ppv=0.65, npv=0.98, Table) to identify the molecular LAR subtype. We observed a trend where response rate was higher in patients with ≥ AR+ IHC scores treated with enzalutamide; however, these results need confirmation in a larger cohort of patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02689427, NCT02276443. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahil Seth
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - James Crespo
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lei Huo
- The Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Program and Clinic, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Kenneth R. Hess
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Gaiane M Rauch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Banu Arun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wei Tse Yang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Naoto T. Ueno
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bora Lim
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Metzger Filho O, Stover DG, Asad S, Ansell PJ, Watson M, Loibl S, Geyer CE, O'Shaughnessy J, Untch M, Rugo HS, Huober JB, Golshan M, Sikov WM, Von Minckwitz G, Rastogi P, Maag D, Wolmark N, Denkert C, Symmans WF. Immunophenotype and proliferation to predict for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC: Results from BrighTNess phase III study. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
510 Background: In TNBC, the interplay between immunophenotype, tumor proliferation (prolif) and achievement of pathologic complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains unknown. Methods: RNA seq was performed on pre-tx research biopsies of stage II/III TNBC enrolled in BrighTNess. NAC regimens included paclitaxel alone or with carboplatin (Cb) or Cb plus veliparib, followed by AC. Computational analysis included subtyping (i.e. PAM50, Pietenpol), prolif (PAM50) and GeparSixto immune signature (GSIS). Cb-containing arms were combined due to similar pCR. Results: High quality RNA seq data was obtained from 482 of 634 pts. PAM50 classified 80.1% of tumors as basal-like. TNBC subtypes were mostly BL1 or BL2 (23.3%), IM (22.4%) or M/MSL (31.7%); 6% were LAR. pCR was higher for basal vs non-basal tumors (52.3% vs 35.4%, p = 0.003). IM had the highest pCR rate (64.2%, 95% CI 59.9%,68.5%). Basal-like was not a significant predictor for Cb benefit (p-interaction = 0.8). Prolif (OR = 0.30 p < 0.001) and GSIS (OR 0.68 p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with pCR but did not correlate with each other (Pearson’s r2 = 0.027). In multivariate analysis, prolif (HR = 0.36 95% CI, 0.21-0.61 p = 0.0002) and GSIS (HR = 0.62 95% CI, 0.49-0.79 p < 0.0001) increased the ability to predict pCR beyond standard clinico-pathologic variables (likelihood ratio = 14.9, p = 0.0001115). Among all pts, those above the median for both prolif. and GSIS had the highest pCR (67%; 84/125) while those below the median for both had the lowest pCR rate (34%; 42/125). Tumors with higher inferred CD8+ T-cell infiltration demonstrated greater benefit from Cb using either TIMER (HR = 0.83 [0.73-0.95]) or CIBERSORT (HR = 0.83 [0.76-0.91]). Tumors with higher inferred total macrophages, particularly immune suppressive M2 macrophages had a higher pCR rate on the non-Cb arm (AC-T) using CIBERSORT (HR = 1.27 [1.07,1.50]). Conclusions: Immunophenotype and proliferation are independent predictors of pCR to standard NAC regimens in TNBC. PAM50 is not a significant predictor of Cb benefit. Exploratory findings suggest that tumor infiltrating immunophenotype (i.e. CD8 T cells and macrophages) may predict response to specific NAC regimens in TNBC. Clinical trial information: NCT02032277.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel G. Stover
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Columbus, OH
| | - Sarah Asad
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Mark Watson
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group (GBG) and Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Charles E. Geyer
- NSABP Foundation and Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA
| | | | | | - Hope S. Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jens Bodo Huober
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mehra Golshan
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Priya Rastogi
- NSABP Foundation and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abuhadra N, Hess KR, Litton JK, Rauch GM, Thompson AM, Lim B, Adrada BE, Mittendorf EA, Damodaran S, Candelaria RP, Arun B, Yang WT, Ueno NT, Santiago L, Murthy RK, Ibrahim NK, Sahin AA, Symmans WF, Moulder SL, Huo L. Beyond TILs: Predictors of pathologic complete response (pCR) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with moderate tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) receiving neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
572 Background: Increased TIL in TNBC is associated with higher rates of pCR. High TIL is also associated with improved disease free survival and overall survival. The aim of this study is to identify data cut-points of pre-treatment low, moderate and high TIL count based on pCR and to identify clinical and pathological predictors of pCR in patients with moderate TIL. Methods: We evaluated the relationship between pCR and TIL in 180 patients with stage I-III TNBC enrolled in the ARTEMIS trial (NCT02276443). Recursive portioning was used to identify cut-points. Clinical and pathological variables such as age at diagnosis, stage, race, histology as well as Ki-67, vimentin, and androgen receptor (AR) by immunohistochemistry, were evaluated in pts with moderate TIL. A multivariable logistic regression model identified variables independently, significantly associated with pCR. Results: Four TIL groups were identified with pCR rates of 23%, 31%, 48% and 78% respectively (p < 0.0001) (Table A). In the two combined moderate TIL groups, 90 (97%) pts were evaluable for the multivariate model. Stage I-II disease, high Ki-67 and low AR were associated with increased probability of pCR (Table B). The multivariable logistic regression model area under the ROC curve was 0.78 (95% CI=0.68-0.88; p<0.0001). A model of computed risk score [ Stage I-II (score 2)+Ki-67≥ 50% (score 1)+AR<10% (score 1)] predicted a probability of 67% for pCR when all three variables were favorable (Table). Conclusions: Four TIL groups were identified. In pts with moderate TIL levels, early stage disease, high Ki-67 and low AR were associated with increased probability of pCR with neoadjuvant therapy. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nour Abuhadra
- MD Anderson Hematology/Oncology Fellowship, Houston, TX
| | - Kenneth R. Hess
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Gaiane M Rauch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Bora Lim
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Banu Arun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wei Tse Yang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Naoto T. Ueno
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Nuhad K. Ibrahim
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Lei Huo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Seth S, Huo L, Rauch GM, Adrada BE, Piwnica-Worms H, Thompson AM, Mittendorf EA, Litton JK, Symmans WF, Draetta GF, Futreal A, Moulder SL, Chang J. Delineating longitudinal patterns of response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Profiling results from a randomized, TNBC enrolling trial to confirm molecular profiling improves survival (ARTEMIS; NCT02276443). J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
586 Background: The heterogeneity of TNBC results in varied responses to NAST: 30-40% of patients (pts) have pathologic complete response (pCR) with excellent prognosis. Those with residual disease, have a much higher risk of recurrence. Longitudinal profiling assesses biologic response to NAST and mechanisms of resistance. Methods: Pts with stage I-III TNBC began a planned 4 cycles of Adriamycin-based chemo (AC). Biopsies were performed pre (mandatory) and post (optional) AC. Volumetric change by ultrasound (VUS) at completion of AC (or progression) was calculated. Pts with sensitive disease received subsequent taxane-based (T) therapy. Pts with insensitive disease were offered phase II trials. Pathologic response was assessed at surgical resection in 47 pts. Matched samples, pre and post AC (N = 48 pts) underwent transcriptomic and genomic profiling. Samples were classified into six previously identified ARTEMIS subtypes of TNBC (ART-Type). Immune deconvolution and estimation was performed using RNA-Seq profiles. Differential pathway-level analysis was performed comparing pre and post AC samples. Results: There was heterogeneity in response to AC with 4 predominate patterns of biologic response (Table). In 48% of cases the ART-Type of the tumor switched after AC, with androgen receptor like (LAR) and immune modulatory (IM) showing greatest stability. Tumors with enrichment in EMT or those with no significant dysregulation after AC (Groups C + D) were associated with less immune modulation and lower rates of pCR compared to those with depleted EMT (A and B) (8.7% vs 45.8%, p = 0.0078). Conclusions: Molecular profiling of longitudinal TNBC samples reveals distinct response patterns in tumors and their micro-environments upon treatment with AC. These patterns were indicative of pathologic response in this cohort; however, they require validation in a separate cohort. Clinical trial information: NCT02276443. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahil Seth
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lei Huo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gaiane M Rauch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrew Futreal
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Genomic Medicine, Houston, TX
| | | | - Jeff Chang
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Echeverria GV, Ge Z, Seth S, Jeter-Jones SL, Zhang X, Zhou X, Cai S, Tu Y, McCoy A, Peoples M, Lau R, Shao J, Sun Y, Bristow C, Carugo A, Ma X, Harris A, Wu Y, Moulder S, Symmans WF, Marszalek JR, Heffernan TP, Chang JT, Piwnica-Worms H. Abstract GS5-05: Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer mediated by a reversible drug-tolerant state. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-gs5-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Approximately 50% of patients with localized triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) have substantial residual cancer burden following treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), resulting in distant metastasis and death for most of these patients. While genomic and phenotypic intra-tumor heterogeneity are pervasive features of TNBCs at the time of diagnosis, the functional contributions of heterogeneous tumor cell populations to chemoresistance have not been elucidated.
To investigate tumor evolution accompanying NACT, we employed orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of treatment-naïve TNBC, which retain intra-tumor heterogeneity characteristic of human TNBC. We discovered that some PDX models initially exhibited partial sensitivity to standard front-line NACT (Adriamycin plus Cytoxan, AC). Following AC, residual tumors were resistant to chemotherapy but repopulated tumors with chemo-sensitive cells if left untreated, indicating that tumor cells possessed inherent plasticity. To identify the tumor cell subpopulation(s) conferring chemoresistance, we conducted barcode-mediated clonal tracking in three independent PDX models by introducing a high-complexity pooled lentiviral barcode library into PDX tumor cells which were then orthotopically engrafted into recipient mice. Strikingly, residual tumors maintained the same heterogeneous clonal architecture as naïve tumors. Concordantly, whole-exome sequencing revealed conservation of genomic subclonal architecture throughout treatment. These results were corroborated by genomic sequencing of serial biopsies pre- and post-AC obtained directly from TNBC patients enrolled on an ongoing clinical trial at MD Anderson (ARTEMIS; NCT02276443). Together, these studies revealed that genomically distinct pre-treatment subclones were equally capable of surviving AC to reconstitute tumors after treatment.
To identify functional addictions of residual tumor cells, we conducted histologic and transcriptomic profiling. Residual tumors following AC-treatment exhibited extensive fibrotic desmoplasia and tumor cell pleomorphism in both PDX models and in serial biopsies obtained from TNBC patients enrolled on the ARTEMIS trial. Strikingly, these AC-induced features were reverted upon regrowth of residual tumors in PDXs and in patients' tumors. Similarly, residual tumors exhibited unique transcriptomic features, many of which are also de-regulated in cohorts of human TNBCs undergoing chemotherapy treatment. These features were nearly completely reverted after tumors regrew, suggesting that the residual tumor state may be a unique and transient therapeutic window. Gene set enrichment analyses revealed that residual tumors had increased activation of oxidative phosphorylation and decreased glycolytic signaling. Pharmacologic targeting of oxidative phosphorylation with a small-molecule inhibitor of mitochondrial electron transport chain complex I (IACS-010759) significantly delayed the regrowth of AC-treated residual tumors in three independent PDX models. Collectively, these studies reveal that a reversible phenotypic state can confer chemoresistance in the absence of genomic selection and that the residual tumor state is a novel therapeutic window for chemo-refractory TNBC.
Citation Format: Echeverria GV, Ge Z, Seth S, Jeter-Jones SL, Zhang X, Zhou X, Cai S, Tu Y, McCoy A, Peoples M, Lau R, Shao J, Sun Y, Bristow C, Carugo A, Ma X, Harris A, Wu Y, Moulder S, Symmans WF, Marszalek JR, Heffernan TP, Chang JT, Piwnica-Worms H. Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer mediated by a reversible drug-tolerant state [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS5-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- GV Echeverria
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Z Ge
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Seth
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - SL Jeter-Jones
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - X Zhang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - X Zhou
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Cai
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Y Tu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - A McCoy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - M Peoples
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - R Lau
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - J Shao
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Y Sun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - C Bristow
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - A Carugo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - X Ma
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - A Harris
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Y Wu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Moulder
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - WF Symmans
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - JR Marszalek
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - TP Heffernan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - JT Chang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - H Piwnica-Worms
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Seth S, Huo L, Rauch G, Lau R, Gilcrease M, Adrada B, Piwnica-Worms H, Symmans WF, Draetta G, Futreal AP, Moulder S, Chang JT. Abstract P3-07-01: Towards a therapeutically relevant subtyping scheme for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), profiling results from A Randomized, TNBC Enrolling trial to confirm Molecular profiling Improves Survival (ARTEMIS). Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p3-07-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer is a highly diverse group of cancers, with poor prognosis, and currently, there are no targeted drugs available in the clinic. In TNBC around 50% percent of the patients respond to chemotherapy, while, the other 50% percent relapse with poor prognosis. There is a need to understand better the targetable mechanisms driving TNBC via integrative analysis of gene-expression, copy-number, and mutational data.
Samples from 220 triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) pts treated with NACT were prioritized for transcriptomic and genomic profiling. Non-negative matrix factorization was used on array-based profiling to identify six robust (ARTEMIS) subtypes. Comparing ARTEMIS subtypes with Vanderbilt subtypes, revealed significant overlap with 4/6 clusters while identifying two new clusters. Logistic regression on ssGSEA scores vs. subtypes revealed several pathways, selectively enriched specific subtypes. CL1/IM (Immune subtype), was enriched in INFg and INFa, while CL2 (MYC/mTOR), showed enrichment of several proliferation-related pathways. In addition, LAR and M (Mesenchymal) pts formed overlapping clusters, using either method.
Two new subtypes did not associate significantly with any of the previous subtypes. The majority of the tumors from the Vanderbilt BL2 and MSL were reclassified into a CL5 (ANGIO) cluster, which was enriched in angiogenesis geneset, including targetable genes like VEGF and FGFR. Also, an MYO (CL3) subtype was identified, with myogenesis-related genes. Of note, TIL (tumor infiltrating lymphocytes) and LAR quantification using IHC were associated with respective ARTEMIS subtypes. Finally, the IM subtype was significantly associated with higher rates of RCB 0-I and the M (CL4) subtype was associated with higher rates of RCB II-III, irrespective of the neoadjuvant treatment regimen.
ARTEMIS subtypes are a novel classification system for TNBC that is focused on therapeutic translation. Further, we show a possibility to classify previously un-classified (UNS) tumors, which will be validated using additional cohorts (TCGA/METABRIC).
Citation Format: Seth S, Huo L, Rauch G, Lau R, Gilcrease M, Adrada B, Piwnica-Worms H, Symmans WF, Draetta G, Futreal AP, Moulder S, Chang JT. Towards a therapeutically relevant subtyping scheme for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), profiling results from A Randomized, TNBC Enrolling trial to confirm Molecular profiling Improves Survival (ARTEMIS) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Seth
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; UT Health McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - L Huo
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; UT Health McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - G Rauch
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; UT Health McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - R Lau
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; UT Health McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - M Gilcrease
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; UT Health McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - B Adrada
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; UT Health McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - H Piwnica-Worms
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; UT Health McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - WF Symmans
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; UT Health McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - G Draetta
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; UT Health McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - AP Futreal
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; UT Health McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - S Moulder
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; UT Health McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| | - JT Chang
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; UT Health McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hylton NM, Symmans WF, Yau C, Li W, Hatzis C, Isaacs C, Albain KS, Chen YY, Krings G, Wei S, Harada S, Datnow B, Fadare O, Klein M, Pambuccian S, Chen B, Adamson K, Sams S, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Magliocco A, Feldman M, Rendi M, Sattar H, Zeck J, Ocal I, Tawfik O, Grasso LeBeau L, Sahoo S, Vinh T, Yang S, Adams A, Chien AJ, Ferero-Torres A, Stringer-Reasor E, Wallace A, Boughey JC, Ellis ED, Elias AD, Lang JE, Lu J, Han HS, Clark AS, Korde L, Nanda R, Northfelt DW, Khan QJ, Viscusi RK, Euhus DM, Edmiston KK, Chui SY, Kemmer K, Wood WC, Park JW, Liu MC, Olopade O, Tripathy D, Moulder SL, Rugo HS, Schwab R, Lo S, Helsten T, Beckwith H, Haugen PK, van't Veer LJ, Perlmutter J, Melisko ME, Wilson A, Peterson G, Asare AL, Buxton MB, Paoloni M, Clennell JL, Hirst GL, Singhrao R, Steeg K, Matthews JB, Sanil A, Berry SM, Abe H, Wolverton D, Crane EP, Ward KA, Nelson M, Niell BL, Oh K, Brandt KR, Bang DH, Ojeda-Fournier H, Eghtedari M, Sheth PA, Bernreuter WK, Umphrey H, Rosen MA, Dogan B, Yang W, Joe B, Yee D, Pusztai L, DeMichele A, Asare SM, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. Abstract P2-07-03: Refining neoadjuvant predictors of three year distant metastasis free survival: Integrating volume change as measured by MRI with residual cancer burden. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p2-07-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Patients achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy have significantly improved event-free survival relative to those who do not; and pCR is an FDA-accepted endpoint to support accelerated approval of novel agents/combinations in the neoadjuvant treatment of high risk early stage breast cancer. Previous studies have shown that recurrence risk increased with increasing burden of residual disease (as assessed by the RCB index). As well, these studies suggest that patients with minimum residual disease (RCB-I class) also have favorable outcomes (comparable to those achieving a pCR) within high risk tumor subtypes. In this study, we assess whether integrating RCB with MRI functional tumor volume (FTV), which in itself is prognostic, can improve prediction of distant recurrence free survival (DRFS); and identify a subset of patients with minimal residual disease with comparable DRFS as those who achieved a pCR. Imaging tools can then be used to identify the subset that will do well early and guide the timing of surgical therapy.
Method: We performed a pooled analysis of 596 patients from the I-SPY2 TRIAL with RCB, pre-surgical MRI FTV data and known follow-up (median 2.5 years). We first assessed whether FTV predicts residual disease (pCR or pCR/RCB-I) using ROC analysis. We applied a power transformation to normalize the pre-surgical FTV distribution; and assessed its association with DRFS using a bi-variate Cox proportional hazard model adjusting for HR/HER2 subtype. We also fitted a bivariate Cox model of RCB index adjusting for subtype; and assessed whether adding pre-surgical FTV to this model further improves association with DRFS using a likelihood ratio (LR) test. For the Cox modeling, penalized splines approximation of the transformed FTV and RCB index with 2 degrees of freedom was used to allow for non-linear effects of FTV and RCB on DRFS.
Result: Pre-surgical MRI FTV is significantly associated with DRFS (Wald p<0.00001), and more effective at predicting pCR/RCB-I than predicting pCR alone (AUC: 0.72 vs. 0.65). Larger pre-surgical FTV remains associated with worse DRFS adjusting for subtype (Wald p <0.00001). The RCB index is also significantly associated with DRFS adjusting for subtype (Wald p<0.00001). Adding FTV to a model containing RCB and subtype further improves association with DRFS (LR p=0.0007). RCB-I patients have excellent DRFS (94% at 3 years compared to 95% in the pCR group). Efforts are underway to identify an optimal threshold for dichotomizing pre-surgical FTV and FTV change measures for use in combination with pCR/RCB-I class to generate integrated RCB (iRCB) groups as a composite predictor of DRFS.
Conclusion: Pre-surgical MRI FTV is effective at predicting minimal residual disease (RCB0/I) in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. Despite the association between FTV and RCB, FTV appears to provide independent added prognostic value (to RCB and subtype), suggesting that integrating MRI volume measures and RCB into a composite predictor may improve DRFS prediction.
Citation Format: Hylton NM, Symmans WF, Yau C, Li W, Hatzis C, Isaacs C, Albain KS, Chen Y-Y, Krings G, Wei S, Harada S, Datnow B, Fadare O, Klein M, Pambuccian S, Chen B, Adamson K, Sams S, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Magliocco A, Feldman M, Rendi M, Sattar H, Zeck J, Ocal I, Tawfik O, Grasso LeBeau L, Sahoo S, Vinh T, Yang S, Adams A, Chien AJ, Ferero-Torres A, Stringer-Reasor E, Wallace A, Boughey JC, Ellis ED, Elias AD, Lang JE, Lu J, Han HS, Clark AS, Korde L, Nanda R, Northfelt DW, Khan QJ, Viscusi RK, Euhus DM, Edmiston KK, Chui SY, Kemmer K, Wood WC, Park JW, Liu MC, Olopade O, Tripathy D, Moulder SL, Rugo HS, Schwab R, Lo S, Helsten T, Beckwith H, Haugen PK, van't Veer LJ, Perlmutter J, Melisko ME, Wilson A, Peterson G, Asare AL, Buxton MB, Paoloni M, Clennell JL, Hirst GL, Singhrao R, Steeg K, Matthews JB, Sanil A, Berry SM, Abe H, Wolverton D, Crane EP, Ward KA, Nelson M, Niell BL, Oh K, Brandt KR, Bang DH, Ojeda-Fournier H, Eghtedari M, Sheth PA, Bernreuter WK, Umphrey H, Rosen MA, Dogan B, Yang W, Joe B, I-SPY 2 TRIAL Consortium, Yee D, Pusztai L, DeMichele A, Asare SM, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. Refining neoadjuvant predictors of three year distant metastasis free survival: Integrating volume change as measured by MRI with residual cancer burden [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-07-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- NM Hylton
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - WF Symmans
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - C Yau
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - W Li
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - C Hatzis
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - C Isaacs
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - KS Albain
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - Y-Y Chen
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - G Krings
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - S Wei
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - S Harada
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - B Datnow
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - O Fadare
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - M Klein
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - S Pambuccian
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - B Chen
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - K Adamson
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - S Sams
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - P Mhawech-Fauceglia
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - A Magliocco
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - M Feldman
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - M Rendi
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - H Sattar
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - J Zeck
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - I Ocal
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - O Tawfik
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - L Grasso LeBeau
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - S Sahoo
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - T Vinh
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - S Yang
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - A Adams
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - AJ Chien
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - A Ferero-Torres
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - E Stringer-Reasor
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - A Wallace
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - JC Boughey
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - ED Ellis
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - AD Elias
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - JE Lang
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - J Lu
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - HS Han
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - AS Clark
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - L Korde
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - R Nanda
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - DW Northfelt
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - QJ Khan
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - RK Viscusi
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - DM Euhus
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - KK Edmiston
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - SY Chui
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - K Kemmer
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - WC Wood
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - JW Park
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - MC Liu
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - O Olopade
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - D Tripathy
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - SL Moulder
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - HS Rugo
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - R Schwab
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - S Lo
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - T Helsten
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - H Beckwith
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - PK Haugen
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - LJ van't Veer
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - J Perlmutter
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - ME Melisko
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - A Wilson
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - G Peterson
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - AL Asare
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - MB Buxton
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - M Paoloni
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - JL Clennell
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - GL Hirst
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - R Singhrao
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - K Steeg
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - JB Matthews
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - A Sanil
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - SM Berry
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - H Abe
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - D Wolverton
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - EP Crane
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - KA Ward
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - M Nelson
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - BL Niell
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - K Oh
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - KR Brandt
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - DH Bang
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - H Ojeda-Fournier
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - M Eghtedari
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - PA Sheth
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - WK Bernreuter
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - H Umphrey
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - MA Rosen
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - B Dogan
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - W Yang
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - B Joe
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - D Yee
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - L Pusztai
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - A DeMichele
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - SM Asare
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - DA Berry
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | - LJ Esserman
- Avera Cancer Institute Center for Precision Oncology, Sioux Falls, ND; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA; Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Loyola University, Maywood, IL; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Arizona, Tuczon, AZ; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Kansas, Westwood, KS; University of Pennsylvania, Philade
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schwab R, Clark A, Yau C, Wolf D, Chien AJ, Majure M, Ewing C, Wallace A, Roesch E, Helsten T, Forero A, Stringer-Reasor E, Vaklavas C, Nanda R, Jaskowiak N, Boughey J, Haddad T, Han H, Lee C, Albain K, Isaacs C, Elias A, Ellis E, Shah P, Lang J, Lu J, Tripathy D, Kemmer K, Yee D, Haley B, Korde L, Edmiston K, Northfelt D, Viscusi R, Khan Q, Symmans WF, Perlmutter J, Hylton N, Rugo H, Melisko M, Wilson A, Singhrao R, Asare S, van't Veer L, DeMichele A, Berry D, Esserman L. Abstract P1-15-02: Withdrawn. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p1-15-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.
Citation Format: Schwab R, Clark A, Yau C, Wolf D, Chien AJ, Majure M, Ewing C, Wallace A, Roesch E, Helsten T, Forero A, Stringer-Reasor E, Vaklavas C, Nanda R, Jaskowiak N, Boughey J, Haddad T, Han H, Lee C, Albain K, Isaacs C, Elias A, Ellis E, Shah P, Lang J, Lu J, Tripathy D, Kemmer K, Yee D, Haley B, Korde L, Edmiston K, Northfelt D, Viscusi R, Khan Q, I-SPY 2 Consortium, Symmans WF, Perlmutter J, Hylton N, Rugo H, Melisko M, Wilson A, Singhrao R, Asare S, van't Veer L, DeMichele A, Berry D, Esserman L. Withdrawn [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-15-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Schwab
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - A Clark
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - C Yau
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - D Wolf
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - AJ Chien
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - M Majure
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - C Ewing
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - A Wallace
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - E Roesch
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - T Helsten
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - A Forero
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - E Stringer-Reasor
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - C Vaklavas
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - R Nanda
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - N Jaskowiak
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - J Boughey
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - T Haddad
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - H Han
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - C Lee
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - K Albain
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - C Isaacs
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - A Elias
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - E Ellis
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - P Shah
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - J Lang
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - J Lu
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - D Tripathy
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - K Kemmer
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - D Yee
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - B Haley
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - L Korde
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - K Edmiston
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - D Northfelt
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - R Viscusi
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - Q Khan
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - WF Symmans
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - J Perlmutter
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - N Hylton
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - H Rugo
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - M Melisko
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - A Wilson
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - R Singhrao
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - S Asare
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - L van't Veer
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - A DeMichele
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - D Berry
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | - L Esserman
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA; University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Mayo Rochester, Rochester, MN; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Loyola University, Chicago, IL; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO; Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; CTEP, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Washington DC; Mayo Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ; University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Berry Consultants, LLC, Houston, TX; Gemini Group, Ann Arbor; Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Marczyk M, Fu C, Lau R, Du L, Trevarton AJ, Sinn BV, Gould RE, Symmans WF, Hatzis C. Abstract P4-08-20: Pre-analytical effects of FFPE extraction methods on targeted and whole transcriptome sequencing assays for endocrine sensitivity in metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p4-08-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The clinical management of patients with metastatic HR-positive breast cancer is often uncertain due to decreased sensitivity to anti-estrogen therapy over time. Recently, we developed a targeted RNAseq based 18-transcript SET ER/PR assay of endocrine sensitivity from biopsies of metastatic cancer. In this work we assess the effect of pre-analytical factors, specifically RNA extraction methods for FFPE tissue samples, on the reliability of the targeted RNAseq assay.
Methods: FFPE blocks and matched fresh frozen (FF) sections from 12 tumors were collected at MD Anderson Cancer Center. RNA from FFPE slides was extracted in duplicate using three kits (Norgen, Qiagen, Roche), and RNAseq libraries from all samples were prepared using Kapa Total RNAseq kit. Targeted RNA libraries were prepared using droplet-based PCR (RainDance), and also by transcriptome-wide RNAseq for comparison. Reads were mapped to genomic sequence using STAR and expression was quantified using RSEM. Expression data were normalized based on expression of 10 reference genes. The effect of FFPE RNA extraction kit on the reliability of the SET index was assessed using linear mixed effects model (LME) analysis, and agreement with FF was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).
Results: Analysis of the whole transcriptome RNAseq data confirmed minimal 3'-end transcript bias from FFPE samples, irrespective of transcript size or FFPE kit. All 18 genes included in the SET index had high overall concordance between FFPE and FF (median CCC percentile=98.8, range 57.2-99.9 for Norgen; similar for the other two kits) and relatively consistent bias across genes, as estimated by the random effects of the LME model. Furthermore, compared to random 18-gene indices, concordance in the SET index values between FF and FFPE was higher than 99.8% of the random samples, verifying the analytical reliability of the selected genes. For the targeted RNAseq assay, RNA from FFPE extracted with the Norgen kit showed the highest concordance compared to FF (CCC=0.956, 95%CI 0.871-0.985). In general, the analytical variation of SET from FFPE samples was greater than that from FF (1.71-2.71 fold greater), with the lowest variation associated with the Norgen kit. The SET index values from targeted RNAseq for both FF and FFPE samples were consistently lower compared to transcriptome-wide RNAseq but were highly correlated, with the Norgen kit having the highest correlation between targeted and transcriptome-wide RNAseq (rho=0.915).
Conclusions: All three FFPE RNA extraction kits have excellent analytical performance compared to FF samples. The Norgen kit may be marginally better yielding higher concordance with FF and lower analytical variation between replicates. All genes in the SET ER/PR showed very good analytical performance in comparison to random indices and individual genes. Targeted gene RNA sequencing appears very promising as a platform for clinical deployment of quantitative assays, showing only a small (fixable) bias compared to RNAseq.
Citation Format: Marczyk M, Fu C, Lau R, Du L, Trevarton AJ, Sinn BV, Gould RE, Symmans WF, Hatzis C. Pre-analytical effects of FFPE extraction methods on targeted and whole transcriptome sequencing assays for endocrine sensitivity in metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-08-20.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Marczyk
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - C Fu
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - R Lau
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - L Du
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - AJ Trevarton
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - BV Sinn
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - RE Gould
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - WF Symmans
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - C Hatzis
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Luen SJ, Salgado R, Dieci MV, Vingiani A, Curigliano G, Gould RE, Castaneda C, D'Alfonso T, Sanchez J, Cheng E, Andreopoulou E, Castillo M, Adams S, Demaria S, Symmans WF, Michiels S, Loi S. Prognostic implications of residual disease tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and residual cancer burden in triple-negative breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:236-242. [PMID: 30590484 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For primary triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), higher pretreatment tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) correlates with increased pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, and improved survival. We evaluated the added prognostic value of residual disease (RD) TILs to residual cancer burden (RCB) in predicting survival post-NAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We combined four TNBC NAC patient cohorts who did not achieve pCR. RD TILs were investigated for associations with recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) using Cox models with stromal TILs as a continuous variable (per 10% increment). The likelihood ratio test was used to evaluate added prognostic value of RD TILs. RESULTS A total of 375 RD TNBC samples were evaluable for TILs and RCB. The median age was 50 years, with 62% receiving anthracycline/taxane chemotherapy. The RCB class after NAC was 11%, 50%, and 39% for I, II, and III, respectively. The median RD TIL level was 20% (IQR 10-40). There was a positive correlation between RD TIL levels and CD8+ T-cell density (ρ = 0.41). TIL levels were significantly lower with increasing post-NAC tumor (P = 0.005), nodal stage (P = 0.032), but did not differ by RCB class (P = 0.84). Higher RD TILs were significantly associated with improved RFS (HR: 0.86; 95% CI 0.79-0.92; P < 0.001), and improved OS (HR: 0.87; 95% CI 0.80-0.94; P < 0.001), and remained significant predictors in multivariate analysis (RFS P = 0.032; OS P = 0.038 for OS). RD TILs added significant prognostic value to multivariate models including RCB class (P < 0.001 for RFS; P = 0.021 for OS). The positive prognostic effect of RD TILs significantly differed by RCB class for RFS (PInt=0.003) and OS (PInt=0.008) with a greater magnitude of positive effect observed for RCB class II than class III. CONCLUSIONS TIL levels in TNBC RD are significantly associated with improved RFS and OS and add further prognostic information to RCB class, particularly in RCB class II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Luen
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - R Salgado
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - M V Dieci
- University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - A Vingiani
- European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - G Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - R E Gould
- MD Anderson Cancer Centre, Houston, USA
| | - C Castaneda
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru
| | - T D'Alfonso
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - J Sanchez
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru
| | - E Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - E Andreopoulou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | - M Castillo
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru
| | - S Adams
- New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - S Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA
| | | | - S Michiels
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Sud, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - S Loi
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Moulder SL, Hess KR, Candelaria RP, Rauch GM, Santiago L, Adrada B, Yang WT, Gilcrease MZ, Huo L, Stauder MC, Arun B, Layman RM, Murthy RK, Damodaran S, Ueno NT, Thompson AM, Lim B, Mittendorf EA, Litton JK, Symmans WF. Precision neoadjuvant therapy (P-NAT): A planned interim analysis of a randomized, TNBC enrolling trial to confirm molecular profiling improves survival (ARTEMIS). J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kenneth R. Hess
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Gaiane M Rauch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Beatriz Adrada
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wei Tse Yang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Lei Huo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Banu Arun
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rachel M. Layman
- The Ohio State University Medical Center James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | - Naoto T. Ueno
- Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Program and Clinic, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Bora Lim
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Basho RK, Trevarton A, Hess KR, Fu C, Lau R, Lin CH, Lichtarge O, Yang WT, Symmans WF, Moulder SL. Incidence of PI3K pathway aberrations and their impact on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alex Trevarton
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kenneth R. Hess
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Chunxiao Fu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Rosanna Lau
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Wei Tse Yang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Symmans WF, Yau C, Chen YY, Datnow B, Wei S, Feldman MD, Ritter J, Duan X, Chen B, Tickman R, Sattar H, Magliocco AM, Kallakury B, Troxell M, Asare S, Liu MC, DeMichele A, Yee D, Berry DA, Esserman L. Residual cancer burden (RCB) as prognostic in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Shi Wei
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - Jon Ritter
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | | | | | - Husain Sattar
- The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | - Smita Asare
- Quantum Leap Health Care Collaborative, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Douglas Yee
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Donald A. Berry
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Laura Esserman
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Luen SJ, Salgado R, Dieci MV, Vingiani A, Curigliano G, Hubbard R, Castaneda Altamirano C, Sanchez J, D'Alfonso T, Cheng E, Castillo Garcia M, Adams S, Ahmed F, Rimm DL, Demaria S, Symmans WF, Michiels S, Loi S. Prognostic implications of residual disease (RD) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Rebekah Hubbard
- Division of Pathology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Sandra Demaria
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Sherene Loi
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sinn BV, Weber K, Denkert C, Fasching PA, Schmitt WD, Thomas K, Ingold-Heppner B, van Mackelenbergh M, Symmans WF, Marmé F, Taube E, Müller V, Kunze CA, Schem C, Pfitzner BM, Stickeler E, von Minckwitz G, Loibl S. Abstract P1-07-01: HLA class I expression is associated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p1-07-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Interactions between cancer cells and the host immune system influence tumor biology, response to therapy and patient survival and their modulation offers promising new approaches for cancer therapy. The downregulation or loss of HLA class I expression in breast cancer cells might be an effective mechanism to evade the recognition by the immune system facilitating malignant behavior.
Aim: To evaluate the association of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) with HLA class I expression and its theranostic value for therapy response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Methods: HLA class I expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 732 pre-therapeutic core biopsies from breast cancer patients treated within the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial. Patients received anthracycline- and taxane-based neoadjuvant therapy and adjuvant endocrine treatment if hormone receptor-positive (HR+). A publicly available microarray dataset of pre-therapeutic core biopsies from 508 breast cancer patients that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine treatment if HR+ was used for validation of the results. The association of HLA class I expression with predefined genomic signatures for immune cell populations was evaluated in publicly available data from the cancer genome atlas.
Results: HLA class I expression was associated with TILs (p < 0.001) and was predictive of better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the subgroup of patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer (14 % in tumors with high HLA vs. 7 % in tumors with low HLA, p = 0.029). Interestingly, high HLA was also predictive for shorter progression-free survival in univariate analysis (HR 1.590, 95 % CI 1.062—2.380; p = 0.024) and after adjustment to clinical and pathological parameters (HR 1.701, 95 % CI 1.105—2.618; p = 0.016). The results could be validated in the independent microarray-based dataset (HR 1.521, 95% CI 1.088 – 2.129; p = 0.0142). HLA class I was not associated with therapy response or survival in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. HLA class I was associated with a predefined signature for T-cells and cytotoxic T- cells in the cancer genome atlas dataset (rho = 0.546).
Conclusion: HLA class I expression is associated with better response but shorter progression-free survival in HR+/HER2- breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The underlying mechanisms warrant further investigation.
Citation Format: Sinn BV, Weber K, Denkert C, Fasching PA, Schmitt WD, Thomas K, Ingold-Heppner B, van Mackelenbergh M, Symmans WF, Marmé F, Taube E, Müller V, Kunze CA, Schem C, Pfitzner BM, Stickeler E, von Minckwitz G, Loibl S. HLA class I expression is associated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- BV Sinn
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - K Weber
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - C Denkert
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - PA Fasching
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - WD Schmitt
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - K Thomas
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - B Ingold-Heppner
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - M van Mackelenbergh
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - WF Symmans
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - F Marmé
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - E Taube
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - V Müller
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - CA Kunze
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - C Schem
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - BM Pfitzner
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - E Stickeler
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - G von Minckwitz
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - S Loibl
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; The University of Texas – MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Yam C, Santiago L, Candelaria RP, Adrada BE, Rauch GM, Hess KR, Litton JK, Piwnica-Worms H, Mittendorf EA, Ueno NT, Lim B, Murthy RK, Damodaran S, Helgason T, Huo L, Thompson AM, Gilcrease MZ, Symmans WF, Moulder SL, Yang W. Abstract P6-03-05: Risk of needle-track seeding with serial ultrasound guided biopsies in triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p6-03-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the breast is a common procedure. In breast cancer patients (pts) undergoing core biopsies and surgical resection on the same day, the rate of tumor cell displacement along the needle track has been reported to be up to 50%. However, the clinical significance of this finding in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients (pts) undergoing serial biopsies while receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is unknown. Here we report the incidence of needle-track seeding (NTS) in a cohort of TNBC pts enrolled on a molecular triaging protocol involving serial biopsies of the index breast lesion.
Methods: We reviewed the clinical records of 144 consecutive TNBC pts enrolled on a molecular triaging protocol at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Per protocol, all pts underwent a pre-treatment research biopsy and were initiated on anthracycline based NACT (AC). Pts with inadequate response to front-line NACT were encouraged to undergo additional biopsies of the index breast lesion prior to switching therapies. Serial breast ultrasound (US) was performed to monitor therapeutic response and incidental evidence of needle-track seeding noted on US was documented.
Results: Clinicopathological characteristics of the pts are summarized in Table 1. 89% (128/144) of pts had a diagnostic breast biopsy done at another center prior to presenting at MDACC. To date, we have performed 209 US guided biopsies of index breast lesions in 144 pts. 92% (193/209) of these biopsies were done mainly for research purposes. 1.4% (2/144) of pts were found to have evidence of NTS on follow up US. The first pt had a T1N0 (1.9cm), grade 3, invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) at diagnosis. She underwent a diagnostic biopsy followed by a research biopsy before initiating AC. She was found to have NTS as well as progression of disease (PD) on follow up US after 2 cycles of AC. The second pt had a T2N0 (3cm), grade 3 IDC at diagnosis. She underwent a diagnostic biopsy at another center, followed by a research biopsy before initiating AC. Like the first pt, she was found to have NTS and PD on follow up US after 2 cycles of AC. Both pts are currently on neoadjuvant clinical trials of novel agents.
Conclusion: The rate of NTS detected on US in TNBC pts undergoing serial biopsies of index breast lesions while receiving NACT is low and further studies are needed to determine the impact of serial biopsies on long term outcomes in TNBC.
Table 1: Patient CharacteristicsCharacteristicN=144Age - Median (years, interquartile range)55 (46-62)Tumor Size Mean (cm, standard deviation)3.4 (2.2)T1 – n(%)35 (24)T2 – n(%)89 (62)T3 – n(%)19 (13)T4 – n(%)1 (1)Clinical Nodal Status Negative – n(%)74 (51)Positive – n(%)70 (49)Grade 1 – n(%)1 (1)2 – n(%)17 (12)3 – n(%)124 (86)Unknown – n(%)2 (1)Histologic Subtype Invasive ductal carcinoma – n(%)121 (84)Invasive lobular carcinoma – n(%)2 (1)Mixed ductal and lobular carcinoma – n(%)3 (2)Metaplastic carcinoma – n(%)13 (9)Not specified – n(%)5 (3)Laterality Right – n(%)72 (50)Left – n(%)72 (50)
Citation Format: Yam C, Santiago L, Candelaria RP, Adrada BE, Rauch GM, Hess KR, Litton JK, Piwnica-Worms H, Mittendorf EA, Ueno NT, Lim B, Murthy RK, Damodaran S, Helgason T, Huo L, Thompson AM, Gilcrease MZ, Symmans WF, Moulder SL, Yang W. Risk of needle-track seeding with serial ultrasound guided biopsies in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-03-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Yam
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - L Santiago
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - RP Candelaria
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - BE Adrada
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - GM Rauch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - KR Hess
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - JK Litton
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - H Piwnica-Worms
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - EA Mittendorf
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - NT Ueno
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - B Lim
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - RK Murthy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Damodaran
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - T Helgason
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - L Huo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - AM Thompson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - MZ Gilcrease
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - WF Symmans
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - SL Moulder
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - W Yang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Powell E, Shao J, Picon HM, Ge Z, Echeverria GV, Peoples M, Bristow C, Cai S, Tu Y, McCoy AM, Piwnica-Worms D, Draetta G, Edwards JR, Moulder SL, Symmans WF, Heffernan TP, Liang H, Piwnica-Worms H. Abstract GS6-06: Identifying metastatic drivers in patient-derived xenograft models of triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-gs6-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Metastases are responsible for the vast majority of deaths due to breast cancer. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer characterized by high rates of metastasis and poor prognosis. We are employing patient derived xenograft (PDX) models of TNBC to identify drivers of metastasis. Tumor samples are obtained from the breast tumors of patients with TNBC and engrafted immediately into the humanized mammary fat pads of immune compromised mice. Lentiviral transduction was employed to express bioluminescent and fluorescent markers in two independent PDX models of TNBC. Using these models, we demonstrated that human breast tumors are capable of completing all stages of the metastatic cascade in mice, and metastatic lesions are observed in organs normally found in patients with metastatic breast cancer including lung, liver, bone, brain, and lymph nodes. Dynamic and reversible epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) was observed as tumors metastasized to lung and were re-passaged to recipient mouse mammary glands. Lung metastases were isolated using bioluminescence imaging and lung metastasis gene expression signatures were generated. Metastasis signatures from two independent PDX models were compared to identify genes that were commonly de-regulated in lung metastases relative to corresponding mammary tumors. Comprehensive gain-of-function screens were then conducted in vivo to identify functional drivers of TNBC metastasis. Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (CEACAM5) was identified as a metastatic driver in this screen. CEACAM5 mRNA and protein levels were elevated in lung metastases relative to corresponding mammary gland tumors in mice. In addition, we demonstrated that CEACAM5 expression was upregulated in the lung metastases of breast cancer patients, and its expression inversely correlated with patient survival. Our data indicate that the metastatic function of CEACAM5 is to promote growth of breast tumors in the lung by inducing MET (mesenchymal to epithelial transition).
Citation Format: Powell E, Shao J, Picon HM, Ge Z, Echeverria GV, Peoples M, Bristow C, Cai S, Tu Y, McCoy AM, Piwnica-Worms D, Draetta G, Edwards JR, Moulder SL, Symmans WF, Heffernan TP, Liang H, Piwnica-Worms H. Identifying metastatic drivers in patient-derived xenograft models of triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Powell
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - J Shao
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - HM Picon
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - Z Ge
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - GV Echeverria
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - M Peoples
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - C Bristow
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - S Cai
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - Y Tu
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - AM McCoy
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - D Piwnica-Worms
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - G Draetta
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - JR Edwards
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - SL Moulder
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - WF Symmans
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - TP Heffernan
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - H Liang
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| | - H Piwnica-Worms
- MD Anderson Cancer Center; Washington University in St. Louis
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Yam C, Huo L, Hess KR, Litton JK, Yang W, Piwnica-Worms H, Mittendorf EA, Ueno NT, Lim B, Murthy RK, Damodaran S, Helgason T, Thompson AM, Santiago L, Candelaria RP, Rauch GM, Adrada BE, Symmans WF, Gilcrease MZ, Moulder SL. Abstract P1-07-22: Androgen receptor positivity is associated with nodal disease in triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p1-07-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Gene expression profiling (GEP) has identified several molecularly distinct subtypes of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Currently, GEP-based molecular diagnostics are not routinely used in clinical decision making due to the lack of proven benefit, costs involved and long turnaround time. However, two molecularly distinct subtypes of TNBC, the luminal androgen receptor (AR) and mesenchymal subtypes, have surrogate CLIA-certified immunohistochemical (IHC) markers, AR and vimentin (VM), respectively, which have the potential for application in the clinic. Here we report the rates of AR and VM positivity and their association with clinicopathological characteristics in a cohort of TNBC pts receiving NACT.
Methods: As part of an ongoing molecular triaging protocol, 144 pts with stage I-III TNBC underwent a pretreatment biopsy for molecular characterization (MC) prior to initiating neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). IHC for AR and VM were performed using commercially available antibodies. AR+ and VM+ were defined as ≥10% and ≥50% staining, respectively. Pts were randomized 2:1 to know (intervention arm, n=93) and not know (control arm, n=51) the MC results. The charts of pts randomized to the intervention arm were reviewed. Categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. Ordinal and continuous variables were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Student's t test as appropriate.
Results: 31% (29/93) and 16% (15/93) of pts were AR+ and VM+, respectively. Only 4% (4/93) of pts were both AR+ and VM+. Clinicopathological characteristics are summarized in Table 1. AR+ pts were more likely to have clinically node positive disease as compared to AR- pts (66% vs 34%, p=0.007). There were no significant differences in clinical tumor size or grade between AR+ and AR- pts. VM+ and VM- pts had similar clinicopathological characteristics.
Conclusion: Pts with AR+ TNBC were more likely to have node positive disease. The impact of AR+ on long term outcomes should be investigated in prospective studies.
Table 1: Association between patient characteristics and AR/VM status AR VM AR+ (n=29)AR- (n=64)p-valueVM+ (n=15)VM- (n=78)p-valueAge - Median (years, interquartile range)58 (48-65)52 (46-61)0.05855 (48-64)56 (47-62)0.88Clinical Tumor Size Mean (cm, standard deviation)3.5 (1.8)3.0 (1.8)0.2872.7 (1.7)3.3 (1.9)0.31T1 – n(%)5 (17)21 (33)0.2307 (47)19 (24)0.098T2 – n(%)21 (72)36 (56) 7 (47)50 (64) T3 – n(%)3 (10)7 (11) 1 (7)9 (12) Clinical Nodal Status Negative – n(%)10 (34)42 (66)0.0078 (53)44 (56)1.00Positive – n(%)19 (66)22 (34) 7 (47)34 (44) Grade 2 – n(%)6 (21)5 (8)0.0763 (20)8 (10)0.293 – n(%)23 (79)59 (92) 12 (80)70 (90)
Citation Format: Yam C, Huo L, Hess KR, Litton JK, Yang W, Piwnica-Worms H, Mittendorf EA, Ueno NT, Lim B, Murthy RK, Damodaran S, Helgason T, Thompson AM, Santiago L, Candelaria RP, Rauch GM, Adrada BE, Symmans WF, Gilcrease MZ, Moulder SL. Androgen receptor positivity is associated with nodal disease in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-22.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Yam
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - L Huo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - KR Hess
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - JK Litton
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - W Yang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - H Piwnica-Worms
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - EA Mittendorf
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - NT Ueno
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - B Lim
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - RK Murthy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Damodaran
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - T Helgason
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - AM Thompson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - L Santiago
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - RP Candelaria
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - GM Rauch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - BE Adrada
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - WF Symmans
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - MZ Gilcrease
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - SL Moulder
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Yam C, Hess KR, Litton JK, Yang WT, Piwnica-Worms H, Mittendorf EA, Ueno NT, Lim B, Murthy RK, Damodaran SK, Helgason T, Huo L, Thompson AM, Gilcrease M, Santiago L, Candelaria RP, Rauch G, Adrada B, Symmans WF, Moulder SL. A randomized, triple negative breast cancer enrolling trial to confirm molecular profiling improves survival (ARTEMIS). J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.tps590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS590 Background: Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), patients (pts) with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) achieving pathologic complete response/residual cancer burden-0 (pCR/RCB-0) or minimal residual disease (RCB-I) have an improved relapse free survival when compared to pts with more extensive residual disease (RCB-II/III) (Symmans et al, JCO 2017). Pts with chemo-resistant TNBC have a poor prognosis as there are currently no FDA-approved targeted agents available for TNBC. We previously reported the ability of a novel gene expression signature (GES) to predict sensitivity to NACT (Hatzis et al, JAMA 2011). Here we seek to prospectively validate the use of this GES in combination with imaging to predict response to NACT and establish the clinical impact of selecting pts predicted to have non-responsive disease (NRD) for enrollment in clinical trials of targeted therapy. Methods: All pts will undergo a biopsy of the primary tumor for molecular characterization (MC) and will be randomized 2:1 to know their MC results (intervention arm) or not (control arm). A maximum of 360 pts will be enrolled and randomized using a group sequential design with one-sided O’Brien-Fleming boundaries, with two equally spaced binding interim tests for futility and superiority and one final test, having an overall Type I error of 0.05 and power of 0.80 to detect an improvement in pCR/RCB-I from 50% to 64%. Secondary endpoints include rates of clinical trial enrollment, disease free survival and integrated biomarker analyses. All pts will receive 4 cycles of anthracycline-based NACT with imaging done every 2 cycles to assess response. After completion or progression on anthracycline-based NACT, pts predicted to have NRD based on MC/imaging (intervention arm) or imaging alone (control arm) will be offered enrollment on a clinical trial. Pts are eligible if they have stage I-III TNBC with a primary tumor that is ≥1.5cm. Pts with contraindications to anthracyclines and/or taxanes are excluded. Enrollment began in November 2015. 105 pts have been enrolled to date with 71 and 34 pts randomized to the intervention and control arms, respectively. Clinical trial information: NCT02276443.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clinton Yam
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kenneth R. Hess
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Wei Tse Yang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Naoto T. Ueno
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bora Lim
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Lei Huo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Gaiane Rauch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Beatriz Adrada
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Geyer CE, O'Shaughnessy J, Untch M, Sikov W, Rugo HS, McKee MD, Huober JB, Golshan M, Giranda VL, Von Minckwitz G, Maag D, Sullivan DM, Wolmark N, McIntyre K, Ponce Lorenzo JJ, Metzger Filho O, Rastogi P, Symmans WF, Liu X, Loibl S. Phase 3 study evaluating efficacy and safety of veliparib (V) plus carboplatin (Cb) or Cb in combination with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients (pts) with early stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
520 Background: Clinical studies suggest that TNBC is sensitive to DNA-damaging agents, including Cb. V is a potent PARP inhibitor that may enhance the antitumor activity of such agents. We present primary response data from a phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled study (NCT02032277) evaluating the addition of V + Cb or Cb to neoadjuvant paclitaxel (P) followed by doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide (AC). Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed, invasive TNBC (T2–T4 N0–2 or T1 N1–2) amenable to surgical resection were randomized 2:1:1 to (Arm A) P 80 mg/m2 weekly + Cb AUC 6 mg/mL/min q3 weeks + V 50 mg PO BID; (Arm B) P + Cb + PO placebo; or (Arm C) P + IV placebo + PO placebo, for 12 weeks followed by AC (60 mg/m2 or 600 mg/m2 q2 or 3 weeks) × 4. Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast and nodes with > 80% power at 2-sided α of 0.05 using pair-wise comparisons for A vs B and A vs C to detect significant treatment effects using Χ2 test; secondary endpoint was rate of conversion to eligibility for breast conservation surgery (BCS). Adverse events (AEs) were assessed with NCI CTCAE V4.0. Results: Six hundred thirty-four pts (median age 50 years; range 22–79) were randomized to Arms A (n = 316), B (n = 160), or C (n = 158). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. No pCR difference was observed between Arms A and B (53.2% vs 57.5% p = 0.36), but pCR in Arm A was higher than Arm C (53.2% vs 31.0% p < 0.001). In non-prespecified analysis, pCR in Arm B was also higher than Arm C (57.5% vs 31.0% p < 0.001). Among pts ineligible for BCS at screening (n = 141), 62% were eligible after NAC in Arm A vs 44% each in Arms B (p = 0.13) and C (p = 0.14). Grade 3–4 AEs (Arms A/B/C, 86%/85%/45%) and serious AEs (30%/27%/14%) neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, nausea, and vomiting were increased with the addition of Cb; V did not impact toxicity. Median cycles of NAC were not reduced with V + Cb + P or Cb + P vs P. Conclusions: Addition of V to neoadjuvant Cb + P followed by AC did not increase pCR rate in breast and nodes in stage II–III TNBC, while addition of V + Cb or Cb alone to P followed by AC did. Cb (+/– V) increased toxicity but did not impact delivery of NAC. Clinical trial information: NCT02032277.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles E. Geyer
- Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA
| | | | | | - William Sikov
- Women and Infants Hospital in Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | - Hope S. Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Mehra Golshan
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | - Norman Wolmark
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Kristi McIntyre
- Texas Oncology, The US Oncology Network, McKesson Specialty Health, Dallas, TX
| | - Jose Juan Ponce Lorenzo
- Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, GEICAM (Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama), Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bayar MA, Criscitiello C, Curigliano G, Symmans WF, Desmedt C, Bonnefoi HR, Sinn BV, Pruneri G, Vicier C, Pierga JY, Denkert C, Loibl S, Sotiriou C, Michiels S, Andre F. A gene signature of chemo-immunization to predict outcome in patients with triple negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
575 Background: In patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the extent of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the residual disease after anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is associated with a better prognosis. We aimed to develop a genomic signature from pre-treatment samples to predict the extent of TILs after NACT, and then to test its prognostic value on survival. Methods: Using 99 pre-treatment samples (training set), we generated a four-gene signature that predicts post-NACT TILs using the LASSO technique. Prognostic value of the signature on survival was assessed on the training set (n=99) and then evaluated on an independent validation set including 185 patients with TNBC treated with NACT. Results: A four-gene signature, assessed on pre-treatment samples and combining the expression levels of HLF, CXCL13, SULT1E1, and GBP1 predicted the extent of lymphocytic infiltration after NACT. In a multivariate analysis performed on the training set, a one-unit increase in the signature value was associated with distant-relapse free survival (DRFS) (HR: 0.28, 95%CI: 0.13-0.63, p=0.002). For the validation set, the four-gene signature was significantly associated with DRFS in the entire set (HR: 0.26, 95%CI: 0.11-0.59, p=0.001) and in the subset of patients with residual disease (HR: 0.23, 95%CI: 0.10-0.55, p< 0·001). Conclusions: We developed a four-gene signature of chemotherapy-induced immune-activation, which predicts outcome in patients with TNBC treated with NACT. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed-Amine Bayar
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Bruno Valentin Sinn
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Fabrice Andre
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Candelaria RP, Bassett RL, Symmans WF, Ramineni M, Moulder SL, Kuerer HM, Thompson AM, Yang WT. Performance of Mid-Treatment Breast Ultrasound and Axillary Ultrasound in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by Breast Cancer Subtype. Oncologist 2017; 22:394-401. [PMID: 28314842 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2016] [Accepted: 12/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary objective was to determine whether mid-treatment ultrasound measurements of index breast tumors and index axillary nodes of different cancer subtypes associate with residual cancer burden (RCB). METHODS Patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had pre-treatment and mid-treatment breast and axillary ultrasound were included in this single-institution, retrospective cohort study. Linear regression analysis assessed associations between RCB with (a) change in index breast tumor size, (b) change in index node size, and (c) absolute number of abnormal nodes at mid-treatment. Multivariate linear regression was used to calculate best-fit models for RCB. RESULTS One hundred fifty-nine patients (68 triple negative breast cancer [TNBC], 45 hormone receptor [HR]+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-, and 46 HR-/HER2+) were included. Median age at diagnosis was 50 years, range 30-76. Median tumor size was 3.4 cm, range 0.9-10.4. Pathological complete response/RCB-I rates were 36.8% (25/68) for TNBC patients, 24.4% (11/45) for HR+/HER2- patients, and 71.7% (33/46) for HR-/HER2+ patients. Linear regression analyses demonstrated associations between percent change in tumor ultrasound measurements at mid-treatment with RCB index score in TNBC and HR+/HER2- (p < .05) but not in HR-/HER2+ (p > .05) tumors and an association between axillary ultrasound assessment of number of abnormal nodes at mid-treatment with RCB index score across all subtypes (p < .05). CONCLUSION Performance characteristics of breast ultrasound associated with RCB vary by cancer subtype, whereas the performance characteristics of axillary ultrasound associated with RCB are consistent across cancer subtype. Breast and axillary ultrasound may be valuable in monitoring response to neoadjuvant therapy. The Oncologist 2017;22:394-401 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The differential performance characteristics of breast ultrasound by molecular subtype and the consistent performance characteristics of axillary ultrasound across molecular subtypes can have clinical utility in monitoring response to neoadjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Henry M Kuerer
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Unit 1434, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alastair M Thompson
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Unit 1434, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sandberg LJ, Clemens MW, Symmans WF, Valero V, Caudle AS, Smith B, Kuerer HM, Hsu L, Kronowitz SJ. Molecular Profiling Using Breast Cancer Subtype to Plan for Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139:586e-596e. [PMID: 28234813 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000003050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Molecular profiling using breast cancer subtype has an increasing role in the multidisciplinary care of the breast cancer patient. The authors sought to determine the role of breast cancer subtyping in breast reconstruction and specifically whether breast cancer subtyping can determine the need for postmastectomy radiation therapy and predict recurrence-free survival to plan for the timing and technique of breast reconstruction. METHODS The authors reviewed prospectively collected data from 1931 reconstructed breasts in breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy between November of 1999 and December of 2012. Reconstructed breasts were grouped by breast cancer subtype and examined for covariates predictive of recurrence-free survival and need for postmastectomy radiation therapy. RESULTS Of the reconstructed breasts, 753 (39 percent) were luminal A, 538 (27.9 percent) were luminal B, 224 (11.6 percent) were luminal HER2, 143 (7.4 percent) were HER2-enriched, and 267 (13.8 percent) were triple-negative breast cancer. Postmastectomy radiation therapy was delivered in 69 HER2-enriched patients (48.3 percent), 94 luminal HER2 patients (42 percent), 200 luminal B patients (37.2 percent), 99 triple-negative breast cancer patients (37.1 percent), and 222 luminal A patients (29.5 percent) (p < 0.0001). Luminal A cases had better recurrence-free survival than HER2-enriched cases, and triple-negative breast cancer cases had worse recurrence-free survival than HER2-enriched cases. Luminal B and luminal HER2 cases had recurrence-free survival similar to that for HER2-enriched cases. Luminal A subtype was associated with the best recurrence-free survival. Subtyping may have improved the breast surgery planning for 33.1 percent of delayed reconstructions that did not require postmastectomy radiation therapy and 37 percent of immediate reconstructions that did require postmastectomy radiation therapy. CONCLUSION This study is the first publication in the literature to evaluate breast cancer subtype to stratify risk for decision making in breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Risk, III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Johan Sandberg
- Houston, Texas
- From the Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Biostatistics, Pathology, Breast Medical Oncology, Surgical Oncology, and Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Mark W Clemens
- Houston, Texas
- From the Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Biostatistics, Pathology, Breast Medical Oncology, Surgical Oncology, and Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - W F Symmans
- Houston, Texas
- From the Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Biostatistics, Pathology, Breast Medical Oncology, Surgical Oncology, and Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Vicente Valero
- Houston, Texas
- From the Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Biostatistics, Pathology, Breast Medical Oncology, Surgical Oncology, and Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Abigail S Caudle
- Houston, Texas
- From the Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Biostatistics, Pathology, Breast Medical Oncology, Surgical Oncology, and Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Benjamin Smith
- Houston, Texas
- From the Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Biostatistics, Pathology, Breast Medical Oncology, Surgical Oncology, and Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Henry M Kuerer
- Houston, Texas
- From the Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Biostatistics, Pathology, Breast Medical Oncology, Surgical Oncology, and Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Limin Hsu
- Houston, Texas
- From the Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Biostatistics, Pathology, Breast Medical Oncology, Surgical Oncology, and Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Steven J Kronowitz
- Houston, Texas
- From the Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Biostatistics, Pathology, Breast Medical Oncology, Surgical Oncology, and Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|