Treatment optimization in early triple negative breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has radically changed in recent years. Response to neoadjuvant treatment has provided prognostic information, and the achievement of a pathological complete response (pCR) is associated with improved prognosis. An exact treatment algorithm that embraces the trade-off of efficacy and toxicity in a risk-adapted manner has, however, not been consolidated.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we focused on the current treatments used for patients with early triple negative breast cancer, aiming at framing a therapeutic approach toward risk-adapted treatment optimization. We reviewed the clinical trials and other evidence at the foundation of the current clinical practice in early TNBC and identified possible areas of clinical implementation.

EXPERT OPINION

In our opinion, treatment optimization will ensure improved patient-centric outcomes, with less toxicities, better long-term quality of life and risk-adapted treatment modulation. Presently, treatment modulation can be applied in some patients through de-intensification, for small TNBC, informed by novel biomarkers and based on the response to neoadjuvant treatments, especially in the case of pCR. Innovative approaches should incorporate baseline risk and cancer biology, treatment response, and post-surgery biomarkers of prognosis, to deliver risk-adapted treatments for patients with early TNBC.

OUP accepted manuscript

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 15%-20% of breast cancers diagnosed worldwide, which amounts to almost 200 000 cases each year. Although historically TNBC is considered difficult to treat with a poor prognosis, there is emerging evidence showing excellent response rates in a subset of TNBC patients. Attempts to de-escalate chemotherapy in hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) and HER2-neu amplified breast cancer subtypes have been successful. At present, robust strategies to personalize therapy in early-stage TNBC do not exist, and despite excellent response rates in a subset of patients, all patients are exposed to the same several cycles of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Personalizing therapy in TNBC represents a challenge due to the scarcity of treatment options outside of cytotoxic chemotherapy and limited predictive and prognostic biomarkers to tailor treatment. Recent developments in understanding TNBC biology have sparked interest in exploring treatment optimization and personalization with the goal of achieving excellent response rates and long-term clinical outcomes, while simultaneously reducing physical, psychological, and financial toxicities for select patients. Here, we provide an update on the current evidence to support future studies examining de-escalating chemotherapy in patients with low-risk TNBC and adjuvant intensification strategies to improve outcomes for patients who are at high risk for systemic failure despite current standard-of-care treatments.