Multicentric Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of Combinatorial Adjuvant Brain Metastasis Treatment by Intraoperative Radiation Therapy and Immunotherapy

A dosimetric comparison of different radiotherapy modalities for Non-Resected oligometastatic liver Disease

Purpose

The role of radiotherapy in the context of limited liver metastases is emerging rapidly with a variety of available technical approaches. Here, we provide a dosimetric comparison of three different radiotherapy modalities for non-resected liver metastases.

Methods

This multicentric study included 30 patients previously treated for solitary liver metastases. Interstitial high dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and kilovoltage electronic brachytherapy (eBT) with a single dwelling point, as an in this context novel modality, were planned with a 25-Gy single fraction and dosimetrically compared. The primary endpoint was difference in healthy liver tissue exposure. Secondary endpoints included target volume coverage, dose to the surrounding organs at risk (OARs), and radiation treatment time.

Results

The median (range) lesion volume was 9.3 (2.5 - 29.7) cm3. Electronic BT yielded a significantly better OAR dose sparing compared to SBRT. Radiation exposure to the healthy liver was significantly lower with eBT (V9.1 Gy 13.8 [3.4-41.6] cm3) and HDR (49.2 [12.7-116.8] cm3) when compared with SBRT (98.8 [54.3-303.7] cm3; p < 0.001 for both). Mean treatment time was shortest for SBRT (6.1 min vs. 7.8 min for HDR [p = 0.003] vs. 16.1 min for eBT [p < 0.001]). Equally, CTV D90% and D95% were superior for SBRT (p < 0.001 vs. HDR and eBT).

Conclusion

Minimally invasive single-catheter eBT provides a new potential approach in the context of unresectable liver metastases, with optimal OAR dose sparing, yet suboptimal target volume coverage. Combining the advantages of both modalities, a multi-dwelling eBT approach as in HDR might ease applicability in clinical routine with optimized target coverage while maintaining excellent OAR doses. Future prospective investigations are required to further define its role within well-established liver-directed therapies.

Boswellia serrata for the Management of Radiation-Induced Cerebral Edema and Necrosis: A Systematic Meta-Narrative Review of Clinical Evidence

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) yields excellent local control in patients with a limited number of brain metastases (BMs), but radiation-induced cerebral edema and radiation necrosis (RN) in particular may cause dose-limiting late toxicity, with the same holding true after fractionated radiation therapy for glioma. In symptomatic patients, the first-line standard of care includes corticosteroids, which may, however, be counterproductive in the evolving era of immunotherapy. Boswellic acid (BA), available as an over-the-counter dietary supplement, has been suggested as a potential corticosteroid-sparing alternative because of its anti-inflammatory and antiangiogenic effects.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, identifying publications reporting on the use of BA during or after brain irradiation in humans. Using the Realist and Meta-Narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards framework, relevant data are summarized using a meta-narrative approach.

RESULTS

Six records (3 for edema reduction in large irradiated volumes and 3 for RN after SRS) were identified, encompassing 130 patients. Roughly half of patients benefited from BA (radiographically or clinically) and about one third could successfully taper dexamethasone or prevent its long-term intake. Tolerability of BA was favorable, with mild gastrointestinal discomfort being reported most frequently. Current drawbacks include unknown optimal formulation as well as timing and dosing, a considerably large number of required daily capsules, and uncertain interactions with other drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the clinical evidence on the use of BA for radiation-induced cerebral edema and RN is lacking and well-designed prospective trials are warranted to further investigate this potential low-cost corticosteroid-sparing option.

Short-term survivors with brain metastases have modest benefits from focal and systemic therapies and remain frequent despite improving treatment landscape

Purpose

Therapeutic options for patients with brain metastases (BM) increase. While these lead to considerable survival effects in subgroups, there is limited knowledge about characteristics, prognosticators and treatment effects in patients with BM and short survival.

Methods

Patients with a survival time of ≤ 6 months (short-term survivors, STS), diagnosed with BM between 2009-2021 at a large tertiary cancer center were analysed. Clinical and treatment characteristics, pathological data and causes of death were documented. Descriptive statistics, treatment-specific univariate Kaplan-Meier estimator analyses and multivariate Cox regression were performed.

Results

Among 1248 patients with BM, 480 (38 %) were STS. 256 STS with detailed clinical records were included in this analysis. In univariate and multivariate analysis, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (p < 0.001) and number of BM (p = 0.004) were prognostic. In 75 % of patients, the ds-GPA score predicted short-term survival. Use of resection with focal radiotherapy (p < 0.001) and systemic treatment (p < 0.001) appeared prognostically favourable compared to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone. However, survival benefits were very modest, with a median gain of 6 weeks following resection and focal radiotherapy compared to whole-brain radiotherapy, and 3 weeks from systemic treatment. Systemic tumor progression was documented as the cause of death in the majority of patients. Over the examined time period, the ratio between STS and other patients remained without significant change.

Conclusion

Within STS, KPS and number of BM are of prognostic relevance. There is benefit from local and systemic therapy to a limited extent. Shared and carefully discussed individual therapy decisions are necessary.

International collaboration of neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: The INTERNEO individual patient data pooled analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (NaSRS) is an emerging treatment option for brain metastases (BrM) planned for resection. The aim of this study was to report on the efficacy and safety of NaSRS in an individual patient data pooled analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing single- and multi-fraction NaSRS for BrM at nine institutions in five countries (Australia, Canada, South Korea, Switzerland and USA) were included. Eligibility criteria included BrM from any primary malignancy and no prior local therapy. The primary endpoint was a composite of local recurrence (LR), any grade radionecrosis (RN), and/or nodular leptomeningeal disease (nLMD). Secondary endpoints included these endpoints and Grade ≥ 2 RN. Endpoints were evaluated using cumulative incidence functions.

RESULTS

NaSRS was delivered to 179 patients with 189 BrM. Median follow-up was 28.4 months. Primary malignancies included non-small cell lung carcinoma (44 %) and melanoma (17 %). The median BrM diameter was 29 mm (IQR 21-36 mm). Single- and multi-fraction NaSRS was utilised in 100 (53 %) and 89 BrM (47 %) respectively. The median single-fraction dose was 18 Gy (IQR 16-20 Gy). Multi-fraction doses included 24 Gy in three fractions (55 %) and 27 Gy in three fractions (25 %). The 12-month incidence for the composite endpoint was 8.0 %. The 12-month incidence of LR was 4.6 %, any grade RN was 3.6 %, Grade ≥ 2 RN was 1.8 % and nLMD was 1.2 %.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant SRS results in favourable rates of LR, RN and nLMD. We provide a global experience of this treatment approach with long-term data and the largest cohort of patients undergoing multi-fraction SRS.

Efficacy and safety of combining anti-angiogenic therapy, radiotherapy, and PD-1 inhibitors in patients with driver gene-negative non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic combination therapy in patients with driver gene-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM) are uncertain.

METHODS

Eighty-eight records of driver gene-negative patients with NSCLC treated with craniocerebral radiotherapy (RT) and programmed death factor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors between May 2021 and May 2023 were collected. Based on whether anti-angiogenic therapy (AT) is combined or not, patients are categorized into the AT group and the non anti-angiogenic therapy (NAT) group. The NAT group patients received craniocerebral RT and PD-1 inhibitor and those in the AT group received craniocerebral RT and PD-1 inhibitor with ≥ 4 cycles of AT. Comparing the clinical efficacy and safety in these two patient cohorts was the main goal of the study.

RESULTS

By May 1, 2024, the iORR was 94.0% and 63.2% for AT and NAT group, respectively. The 1- and 2-year iLPFS for AT and NAT group were 93.6%, 80.9% and 69.7%, 36.4%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year iDPFS were 86.7%, 56.3% and 59.1%, 48.3%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year OS were 82.0%, 36.6% and 68.4%, 34.6%, respectively. Compared to the standard treatment (RT and PD-1 inhibitors), the addition of AT prolonged the median iLPFS (NR vs. 22.0 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 11.004, P < 0.001) and the median iDPFS (NR vs. 20.0 months, HR = 8.732, P = 0.003), but was not significant in the extension of the OS (21.0 vs. 19.0 months, HR = 1.601, P = 0.206). Multivariable analysis showed that combination therapy with AT is significantly associated with prolonged iLPFS (HR = 4.233, P = 0.002) and iDPFS (HR = 2.824, P = 0.007), whereas only GPA score is significantly associated with improved OS (HR = 0.589, P = 0.019). The incidence of hypertension in the AT group showed an increasing trend, and no significant increased risk of radiation-induced brain necrosis was found. No drug-related intracranial hemorrhage events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Combining AT, RT, and PD-1 inhibitors can substantially improve iLPFS and iDPFS for patients with driver gene-negative NSCLC with BM; however, it is not significantly associated with better OS.

Intraoperative radiotherapy after neurosurgical resection of brain metastases as institutional standard treatment- update of the oncological outcome form a single center cohort after 117 procedures

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is the predominant method for the irradiation of resection cavities after resection of brain metastases (BM). Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with 50 kV x-rays is an alternative way to irradiate the resection cavity focally. We have already reported the outcome of our first 40 IORT patients treated until 2020. Since then, IORT has become the predominant cavity treatment in our center due to patients´ choice.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of all patients who underwent resection of BM and IORT between 2013 and August 2023 at Augsburg University Medical Center (UKA).

RESULTS

We identified 105 patients with 117 resected BM treated with 50 kV x-ray IORT. Median diameter of the resected metastases was 3.1 cm (range 1.3 - 7.0 cm). Median applied dose was 20 Gy. All patients received standardized follow-up (FU) including three-monthly MRI of the brain. Mean FU was 14 months, with a median MRI FU for patients alive of nine months. Median overall survival (OS) of all treated patients was 18.2 months (estimated 1-year OS 57.7%). The observed local control (LC) rate of the resection cavity was 90.5% (estimated 1-year LC 84.2%). Distant brain control (DC) was 61.9% (estimated 1-year DC 47.9%). Only 16.2% of all patients needed WBI in the further course of disease. The observed radio necrosis rate was 2.6%.

CONCLUSION

After 117 procedures IORT still appears to be a safe and appealing way to perform cavity RT after neurosurgical resection of BM with low toxicity and excellent LC.