Irreversible electroporation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer through a minimally invasive surgery supported by laparoscopic ultrasound

Modeling of a single bipolar electrode with tines for irreversible electroporation delivery

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a non-thermal tumor ablation technology employed to treat solid tumors not amenable to resection or thermal ablation. The IRE systems currently in clinical use deliver electrical pulses via multiple monopolar electrodes. This approach can present significant technical challenges due to the requirement for accurate placement of multiple electrodes and maintenance of parallel electrode alignment during pulse delivery. In this study, we sought to evaluate a novel IRE electrode configuration consisting of a single bipolar electrode with deployable tines. Using commercial finite element software predicted ablation outcomes, thermal damage, ablation sphericity, and energy delivery were calculated for existing monopolar and bipolar electrodes, and bipolar electrodes with either 4 or 8 deployable tines. The bipolar electrodes with tines generated larger predicted ablations compared to existing monopolar (>100%) and bipolar (>10%) arrangements, and the ablation shape using bipolar electrodes with tines were more spherical than those modeled for bipolar electrodes. Thermal damage modeled for bipolar electrodes and bipolar electrodes with tines was less than that of monopolar electrodes (using identical pulse parameters), and bipolar electrodes with tines delivered less energy than monopolar or bipolar electrodes. These studies using a single point of device insertion suggest the potential for developing alternative IRE delivery techniques, and may simplify clinical use and increase the predicted ablation shape/volume.

Minimally invasive image-guided therapy of primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a challenging malignancy with limited treatment options and poor life expectancy. The only curative option is surgical resection, but only 15%-20% of patients are resectable at presentation because more than 50% of patients has distant metastasis at diagnosis and the rest of them has locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The standard of care first line treatment for LAPC patients is chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy. Recent developments in minimally invasive ablative techniques may add to the treatment armamentarium of LAPC. There are increasing number of studies evaluating these novel ablative techniques, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation and irreversible electroporation. Most studies which included pancreatic tumor ablation, demonstrated improved overall survival in LAPC patients. However, the exact protocols are yet to set up to which stage of the treatment algorithm ablative techniques can be added and in what kind of treatment combinations. Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer has dismal prognosis with 5-year survival is only 3%. The most common metastatic site is the liver as 90% of pancreatic cancer patients develop liver metastasis. Chemotherapy is the primary treatment option for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, when the tumor is not responding to chemotherapy or severe drug toxicity develops, locoregional liver-directed therapies can provide an opportunity to control intrahepatic disease progression and improve survival in selected patients. During the last decade new therapeutic options arose with the advancement of minimally invasive technologies to treat pancreatic cancer patients. These new therapies have been a topic of increasing interest due to the severe prognostic implications of locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer and the low comorbid risk of these procedures. This review summarizes new ablative options for patients with LAPC and percutaneous liver-directed therapies for patients with liver-dominant metastatic disease.

Local ablation of pancreatic tumors: State of the art and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

Currently, the technologies most commonly used to treat locally advanced pancreatic cancer are radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation, and irreversible (IRE) or reversible electroporation combined with low doses of chemotherapeutic drugs.

AIM

To report an overview and updates on ablative techniques in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Several electronic databases were searched. The search covered the years from January 2000 to January 2021. Moreover, the reference lists of the found papers were analysed for papers not indexed in the electronic databases. All titles and abstracts were analysed.

RESULTS

We found 30 studies (14 studies for RFA, 3 for microwave therapy, 10 for IRE, and 3 for electrochemotherapy), comprising 1047 patients, which were analysed further. Two randomized trials were found for IRE. Percutaneous and laparotomy approaches were performed. In the assessed patients, the median maximal diameter of the lesions was in the range of 2.8 to 4.5 cm. All series included patients unfit for surgical treatment, but Martin et al assessed a subgroup of patients with borderline resectable tumours who underwent resection with margin attenuation with IRE. Most studies administered chemotherapy prior to ablative therapies. However, several studies suggest that the key determinant of improved survival is attributable to ablative treatment alone. Nevertheless, the authors suggested chemotherapy before local therapies for several reasons. This strategy may not only downstage a subgroup of patients to curative-intent surgery but also support to recognize patients with biologically unfavourable tumours who would likely not benefit from ablation treatments. Ablation therapies seem safe based on the 1047 patients assessed in this review. The mortality rate ranged from 1.8% to 2%. However, despite the low mortality, the reported rates of severe post procedural complications ranged from 0%-42%. Most reported complications have been self-limiting and manageable. Median overall survival varied between 6.0 and 33 mo. Regarding the technical success rate, assessed papers reported an estimated rate in the range of 85% to 100%. However, the authors reported early recurrence after treatment. A distinct consideration should be made on whether local treatments induce an immune response in the ablated area. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown that RFA is a promising mechanism for inducing antigen-presenting cell infiltration and enhancing the systemic antitumour T-cell immune response and tumour regression.

CONCLUSION

In the management of patients with pancreatic cancer, the possibility of a multimodal approach should be considered, and conceptually, the combination of RFA with immunotherapy represents a novel angle of attack against this tumour.

Irreversible electroporation of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) constitutes approximately one-third of all pancreatic cancer, with standard of care inconsistently defined and achieving modest outcomes at best. While resection after downstaging offers the chance for cure, only a fraction of patients with LAPC become candidates for resection. Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for the remainder. In these patients, ablative therapy may be given for local control of the tumor. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an attractive ablative technique. IRE changes the permeability of tumor cell membranes to induce apoptosis. Unlike other ablative therapies, IRE causes little thermal injury to the target area, making it ideal for LAPC involving major vessels. Compared to systemic chemotherapy alone, IRE seems to offer some survival benefit. Although early studies reported notable morbidity and mortality rates, IRE presents opportunities for those who cannot undergo resection and who otherwise have limited options. Another role of IRE is to extend the margins of resected tumors when there is a concern for R1 resection. Perhaps most exciting, IRE is thought to have effects beyond local ablation. IRE has immunomodulatory effects, which may induce in vivo vaccination and may potentially synergize with immunotherapy. Through electrochemotherapy, IRE may enhance drug delivery to residual tumor cells. Ultimately the role of IRE in the treatment of LAPC still needs to be validated through well designed randomized trials. Investigations of its future possibilities are in the early stages. IRE offers the potential to provide more options to LAPC patients.

Feasibility of Electroacoustic Tomography: A Simulation Study

The feasibility of electroacoustic tomography (EAT) was investigated for in situ monitoring the electric field distribution in soft tissue. EAT exploits the phenomenon that the amplitude of acoustic emission generated by an electric field is proportional to the electrical energy deposition in tissue. After detecting these acoustic waves with ultrasound transducers, an image of the electric field distribution can be reconstructed in real-time. In our computer simulations, the electric field distribution in soft tissue was generated by solving general partial differential equations (PDEs) using finite element analysis (FEA). The electric field distributions were converted into initial pressure distributions, and the propagation of the induced acoustic waves was simulated using K-Wave simulation. A circular array of 128 ultrasound transducers was placed around the target to detect the acoustic waves, and a time reversal reconstruction algorithm was used to reconstruct the EAT image. A different number of electrodes set at different distances with different voltage inputs on the electrodes were performed to simulate different electric field distributions during electroporation. It was found that the electrical energy deposition in reconstructed EAT imaging is decreased as the distance of the electrodes increases. We also have investigated the sensitivity of the EAT imaging with different voltage inputs. The minimal voltage we can detect with EAT is 970 V at the pulsewidth of 180 ns. The results of this study demonstrated that EAT is a feasible technique for monitoring the electric field distribution and guiding the electrotherapy in future clinical practice.

Irreversible Electroporation of the Pancreas

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a relatively recent method of ablation. In contrast to many ablation devices that use thermal methods to induce cell death, IRE employs the use of an electric field to cause irreversible permeability of the cell membrane, thus inducing apoptosis. Since its use in the pancreas was first described in 2012, IRE has become established as part of the armamentarium of ablation devices currently available. The crucial advantage of IRE compared with other devices employing thermal ablation is the safety around vital structures such as vessels and ducts. This is especially important in the pancreas due to the close proximity of multiple major vascular structures, biliary ducts, and adjacent gastrointestinal organs. This article will explore the current evidence regarding the use of IRE in the pancreas.

Systematic Review of Surgical and Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present systematic review was to collect, analyze, and critically evaluate the role of irreversible electroporation (IRE) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Furthermore, we sought to analyze the different approaches of IRE (open, laparoscopic, and percutaneous) and assess the relative outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Using the MEDLINE (1966-2018), Scopus (2004-2018), Google Scholar (2004-2018) and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, eligible articles published up to August 2018 were included. The following keywords were applied: 'irreversible electroporation', 'IRE', 'LAPC', 'unresectable pancreatic cancer', 'palliative treatment', 'locally advanced pancreatic cancer', 'ablation' and 'ablative treatment'.

RESULTS

IRE for LAPC was feasible and safe; however, it was associated with morbidity in approximately one in three patients, some of whom experienced serious complications, particularly after surgical IRE. In addition, while mortality following IRE was uncommon, it did occur in 2% of patients. While some studies suggested a survival benefit, others failed to note an improvement in long-term outcomes following IRE compared with other therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers and patients need to be aware of the potential morbidity and mortality associated with IRE. In addition, based on the literature to date, the survival benefit of IRE for LAPC remains to be elucidated. Conclusive and definitive evidence to support a survival benefit of IRE does not currently exist. Future multicenter, randomized, prospective trials are needed to clarify the role of IRE in patients with LAPC.