Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumours-Case series of a rare malignancy

A Case of a Neuroendocrine Tumor in a Liver Transplant Patient: Diagnostic and Management Difficulties

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the liver are a rare entity. NETs are often poorly recognized, with diagnostic difficulties and differential challenges between primary tumors of the liver and metastases from other organs, mainly from the gastrointestinal tract. Multidisciplinary and multi-technical diagnosis is mandatory to properly treat these tumors. This case describes the complex history and the treatment course of a 68-year-old man with a history of NET onset after liver transplantation. Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with advanced liver disease or acute liver failure, but careful pre- and post-transplant patient monitoring is required. Liver transplant patients receive immunosuppressive therapy, and donor livers should be screened to exclude potential malignancies. This clinical case, in addition to emphasizing the diagnostic and therapeutic difficulty of hepatic NET, underlines the role of post-transplant immunosuppressive therapy and pre-transplant screening, which includes a thorough evaluation of donor and recipient history, physical examination, and laboratory tests. Moreover, post-transplant immunosuppressive therapy is essential to maintain the viability of the transplanted organ, but it is not free from potential risks, including an increased risk of cancer. Therefore, close monitoring of therapy is necessary to optimize long-term results and the patient's quality of life.

Diagnostic dilemma in a patient with history of medullary thyroid carcinoma and abnormal serum liver enzymes; a case report with six years follow up

BACKGROUND

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a neuroendocrine tumor that originates from parafollicular C-cells. Calcitonin (Ctn) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are useful biomarkers for monitoring MTC cases.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we describe a 48-year-old woman, who presented in 2014 with bilateral thyroid nodules. Report of fine needle aspiration was suspicious for MTC; initial laboratory evaluation showed serum Ctn level of 1567 pg/mL. After excluding type 2 multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome clinically, total thyroidectomy and neck lymph node dissection were performed. The final histopathological diagnosis was right lobe MTC with neither vascular invasion nor lymph node involvement. On regular follow-up visits, Ctn and CEA levels have been undetectable, and repeated cervical ultrasonographic exams were unremarkable from 2014 to 2021. As liver enzymes became elevated in 2016, the patient was further evaluated by a gastroenterologist. Abdominopelvic ultrasonography revealed a coarse echo pattern of the liver parenchyma with normal bile ducts. A liver fibroscan showed a low fibrosis score (7kPa). The patient was recommended to use ursodeoxycholic acid. According to the progressive rise of liver enzymes with a cholestatic pattern in October 2020, a liver biopsy was performed that showed tiny nests of neuroendocrine-like cells with a background of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Immunohistochemical stainings were positive for chromogranin A (CgA), and synaptophysin and negative for Ctn, CEA, and thyroglobulin. Further imaging investigations did not reveal any site of a neuroendocrine tumor in the body. Considering normal physical exam, imaging findings, as well as normal serum levels of Ctn, CEA, CgA, and procalcitonin, the patient was managed as a PBC.

CONCLUSION

In follow-up of a patient with MTC, we reported progressively increased liver enzymes with a cholestatic pattern. Liver biopsy revealed nests of neuroendocrine-like cells with a background of PBC, the findings that might suggest acquiring neuroendocrine phenotype by proliferating cholangiocytes.

A rare primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumour with laparoscopic resection: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumours (PHNETs) are a rare form of hepatic neoplasms, and it is difficult to differentiate them from common hepatic malignancies in routine imaging studies.

PRESENTATION OF THE CASE

We describe the case of a 60-year-old Indian male patient with a tentative preoperative diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nevertheless, the definitive post-operative diagnosis was made by Histopathological and immunohistochemical assessment, which revealed a grade II neuroendocrine tumour (NET) of moderate differentiation. Surgical resection was performed through a minimally invasive approach with a favourable postoperative course and a short hospital stay. One-month Post-operative Octreotide scan showed no extrahepatic primary origin of the tumour.

DISCUSSION

PHNET is a rare entity, and multi modalities investigations, including imaging, serology, endoscopy series, and histopathology findings, aside from long-term follow-up to rule out another primary origin, are essential for the final diagnosis of PHNET. Surgical resection stands as the mainstay of treatment of PHNETs.

CONCLUSION

The absence of primary liver diseases should expand our possible differential diagnosis. Laparoscopic surgical resection of PHNETs carries a favourable outcome.

Primary neuroendocrine tumors and primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the liver: a proposal for a multidiscipline definition

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors and primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare and pose challenges for both diagnosis and for determining whether the tumor is primary to the liver versus metastatic disease. The lack of a uniform definition for primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is also a limitation to understanding and treating these rare tumors. Recently, there have been significant histological advances in the diagnosis and classification of neuroendocrine tumors in general, as well as significant advances in imaging for neuroendocrine neoplasms, all of which are important for their treatment. This article presents a multiple disciplinary definition and proposed guidelines for diagnosing a neuroendocrine tumor/neuroendocrine carcinomas as being primary to the liver.

PET/CT Variants and Pitfalls in Liver, Biliary Tract, Gallbladder and Pancreas

A wide variety of pathological anomalies may occur in the liver, biliary system, and pancreas. It is a necessity to use many different imaging techniques in order to distinguish such varied pathologies, especially those from malignant processes. Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) is an imaging method that has proven its diagnostic value in oncology and can be used for different clinical purposes. Fluoro-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose has a wide range of uses as a dominant radiopharmaceutical in routine molecular imaging, however, molecular imaging has started to play a more important role in personalized cancer treatment in recent years with new Fluoro-18 and Gallium-68 labeled tracers. Although molecular imaging has a strong diagnostic effect, the surprises and pitfalls of molecular imaging can lead us to unexpected and misleading results. Prior to PET/CT analysis and reporting, information about possible technical and physiological pitfalls, normal histological features of tissues, inflammatory pathologies, specific clinical features of the case, treatment-related complications and past treatments should be evaluated in advance to avoid misinterpretation. In this review, the physiological and pathophysiological variants as well as pitfalls encountered in PET/CT imaging of the liver, biliary tract, gallbladder, and pancreas will be examined. Other benign and malignant pathologies that have been reported to date and that have led to incorrect evaluation will be listed. It is expected that the devices, software, and artificial intelligence applications that will be developed in the near future will enable much more effective and faster imaging that will reduce the potential causes of error. However, as a result of the dynamic and evolving structure of the information obtained by molecular imaging, the inclusion of the newly developed radiopharmaceuticals in routine practice will continue to carry new potentials as well as new troubles. Although molecular imaging will be the flagship of diagnostic oncology in the 21st century, the correct analysis and interpretation by the physician will continue to form the basis of achieving optimal performance.

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumour masquerading as a giant haemangioma: an unusual presentation of a rare disease

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumour is an exceedingly rare entity. We hereby delineate the case of a 45-year-old Balti descent woman who hails from a land-locked village situated in the foothills of the Pakistani Himalayas. The patient presented to our medical centre with a hepatic mass. She underwent extensive diagnostic workup. The consistent findings of an abdominal CT scan, coupled with her clinical history, insinuated a preoperative diagnosis of atypical hepatic haemangioma. After a detailed discussion in a multidisciplinary meeting, a standard right hemihepatectomy was performed. She had an uneventful postoperative recovery and was discharged in stable condition after 1 week. Surprisingly, pathological examination and immunohistochemistry of the resected specimen divulged the diagnosis of a grade II primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumour. Her somatostatin-receptor scintigraphy and Gallium-68 DOTATATE positron emission tomography scan excluded residual hepatic or additional body lesions. Regular follow-ups over the past 4 years demonstrated unremarkable radiological findings with no recurrence to date.

Primary neuroendocrine tumor of liver: An eye opener for a pathologist

Introduction:

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are neoplasms that arise from cells of the endocrine (hormonal) and nervous systems. Many are benign, while some are malignant. They most commonly occur in the intestine. While the liver is a common site of metastases.

Case Presentation:

We describe a 73-year-old female who reported to our center with complains of swelling and pain in the right upper quadrant of stomach. CECT revealed large well-localized multicystic mass in the right lobe of the liver. A suspicion of hydatid cyst was given. However, immunogenic tests results were negative for hydatid cyst. The AFP level was also unremarkable.

Conclusion:

Histopathological examination with immunohistochemical panel along with other serological and radiological investigations made the diagnosis possible due to its vague clinical presentation.