Surgical excision of a lactating adenoma with rapid enlargement: A case report

Clinical utility of quantitative ultrasonography parameters combined with serum cancer antigen 15‑3, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and soluble E‑cadherin in diagnosing mass‑type breast cancer

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), a newly developed imaging technique, holds certain value in differentiating benign from malignant tumors. Additionally, serum tumor markers also exhibit significant clinical importance in the diagnosis and monitoring of malignant tumors. Reports have indicated abnormal expression of HER-2, CA153 and sE-cad in breast cancer. Early diagnosis of breast cancer facilitates early clinical intervention and enhances the overall quality of life for patients. Therefore, this study aims to explore the clinical value of quantitative CEUS parameters combined with serum levels of CA153, HER-2 and sE-cad in diagnosing mass-type breast cancer. In total, 49 patients with breast cancer (breast cancer group) and 56 patients with benign breast tumors (benign group) were selected as the study participants, while 50 healthy women served as the control group. Ultrasonography was performed on the patients in the breast cancer and benign groups using diagnostic color Doppler ultrasonography. The serum CA15-3, HER-2 and sE-cad levels in all three study groups were measured using a fully automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Pearson's correlation test was used to analyze the correlation between the quantitative ultrasonography parameters and serum CA15-3, HER-2 and sE-cad levels. Logistic multivariate regression analysis was performed to analyze the independent risk factors, and a receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to assess the diagnostic value of these factors. The peak intensity (PI), wash-in slope (WIS), gradient (Grad) and local mean transit time (mTTI), along with the CA15-3, HER-2 and sE-cad levels in the breast cancer group were significantly higher, and the time to peak (TTP) was significantly lower, compared with those values in the benign and control groups. CA15-3, HER-2 and sE-cad were negatively correlated with TTP in the breast cancer group (all P<0.05) and positively correlated with PI, WIS, Grad and mTTI (all P<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) values for CA15-3, HER-2, sE-cad, PI, WIS, Grad, mTTI and TTP for the diagnosis of malignant breast cancer were 0.640, 0.730, 0.687, 0.683, 0.692, 0.737, 0.697 and 0.671, respectively. The AUC for the combined diagnosis was 0.919, with a sensitivity of 0.857 and a specificity of 0.911, outperforming each index alone for a single diagnosis. Logistic multivariate regression analysis revealed that HER-2, TTP, PI, WI and Grad were independent risk factors for malignant breast cancer. In conclusion, combining the quantitative ultrasonography parameters with the CA15-3, HER-2 and sE-cad levels facilitated the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions, and may provide a reference for clinical treatment in the future.

Lactating Adenoma in Pregnancy: Report of Three Cases

BACKGROUND

Lactating adenoma is an infrequent benign stromal breast tumor mostly seen during pregnancy and lactation. This report seeks to enhance the literature by presenting three cases diagnosed with this condition, while also highlighting its histological subtypes, immunohistochemical characteristics, and differential diagnoses. Case Presentation: In all three patients, a circumscribed, painless, and mobile mass was found in the breast in the third trimester of pregnancy. Pathohistological examination revealed hyperplastic lobules with glandular formations in back-to-back arrangements showing more or less abundant hobnailing phenomena with intraluminal eosinophilic secretions and inconspicuous myoepithelial cell layer separated by fibrovascular stroma. The immune profile showed positive reaction for cytokeratin 14 and p40 markers, indicating the presence of myoepithelial cells and distinguishing these cases from other breast lesions.

CONCLUSION

Pathohistological and immunohistochemical analysis should be performed to differentiate these lesions from other benign lesions and malignant tumors.

MRI of the Lactating Breast

The breasts undergo marked physiologic changes during lactation that can make conventional imaging evaluation with mammography and US challenging. MRI can be a valuable diagnostic aid to differentiate physiologic and benign processes from malignancy in patients who are lactating. In addition, MRI may allow more accurate delineation of disease involvement than does conventional imaging and assists in locoregional staging, screening of the contralateral breast, assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and surgical planning. Although the American College of Radiology recommends against patients undergoing contrast-enhanced MRI during pregnancy because of fetal safety concerns, contrast-enhanced MRI is safe during lactation. As more women delay childbearing, the incidence of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) and breast cancer in lactating women beyond the 1st year after pregnancy is increasing. Thus, MRI is increasingly being performed in lactating women for diagnostic evaluation and screening of patients at high risk. PABC is associated with a worse prognosis than that of non-PABCs, with delays in diagnosis contributing to an increased likelihood of advanced-stage disease at diagnosis. Familiarity with the MRI features of the lactating breast and the appearance of various pathologic conditions is essential to avoid diagnostic pitfalls and prevent delays in cancer diagnosis and treatment. The authors review clinical indications for breast MRI during lactation, describe characteristic features of the lactating breast at MRI, and compare MRI features of a spectrum of benign and malignant breast abnormalities. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Chikarmane in this issue.

A ultrasonic nomogram of quantitative parameters for diagnosing breast cancer

This study aimed to develop a nomogram through the collection of quantitative ultrasound parameters to predict breast cancer. From March 2021 to September 2022, a total of 313 breast tumors were included with pathological results. Through collecting quantitative ultrasound parameters of breast tumors and multivariate regression analysis, a nomogram was developed. The diagnostic performances, calibration and clinical usefulness of the nomogram for predicting breast cancer were assessed. A total of 182 benign and 131 malignant breast tumors were included in this study. The nomogram indicated excellent predictive properties with an AUC of 0.934, sensitivity of 0.881, specificity of 0.848, PPV of 0.795 and NPV of 0.841. The calibration curve showed the predicted values are basically consistent with the actual observed values. The optimum cut-off for the nomogram was 0.310 for predicting cancer. The decision curve analysis results corroborated good clinical usefulness. The model including BI-RADS score, SWE and VI is potentially useful for predicting breast cancer.

MRI Evaluation of the Lactating Breast

Purpose of Review

To review the MRI appearance of physiologic lactational changes, common benign pathologies, and malignancies in the lactating breast.

Recent Findings

The prevalence of pregnancy-associated breast cancer has increased as more women delay childbirth and lactation. There is a transient increase in breast cancer risk after delivery when women may be lactating. MRI is more sensitive than mammography and ultrasound for the evaluation of the extent of disease in lactating women.

Summary

Understanding the key MRI findings of benign and malignant pathologies in the lactating breast is critical for accurate diagnosis and prompt evaluation of pregnancy-associated breast cancer.