Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with transit loop bi-partition: A novel bariatric procedure

Outcomes of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass as an Alternative Procedure in Treating Obesity: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) bypass is a novel bariatric procedure that simplifies Santoro's procedure, balancing functional restriction and neuroendocrine modulation while preserving anatomy. We aim to conduct a single-arm meta-analysis of the SASI bypass to explore its moderate-term efficacy, as this might expand the available choices for surgeons to choose the best bariatric surgery that suits the patient's condition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane to identify studies for the SASI bypass surgery focusing on outcomes such as %EWL, %TWL, remission rate of comorbidities, and complications. The statistical analysis was carried out using RStudio version 4.3.2. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics.

RESULTS

Our findings illuminate SASI's potency by undertaking a single-arm meta-analysis involving 1873 patients across 26 studies. At 12 months, we report a noteworthy % Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) (Mean 84.13; 95% CI 78.41-89.85; I2 = 95%), and % Total Weight Loss (%TWL) (Mean 35.17; 95% CI 32.30-38.04; I2 = 97%), highlighting SASI's efficacy on weight loss. Cumulative meta-analyses supported these findings. More weight loss was observed with a 250 cm common limb and a greater than 3 cm anastomosis. An 88.28% remission rate in type 2 diabetes mellitus (95% CI 79.74-95.03; I2 = 84%) at 12 months was observed. Beyond weight outcomes, SASI impacts comorbidities with a good safety profile.

CONCLUSION

Our study positions the SASI bypass as a good alternative option. However, long-term efficacy is yet to be explored in the future.

Efficiency and safety of single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass in the treatment of obesity and associated comorbidities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) bypass is a new bariatric surgery corresponding to an adaptation of the Santoro approach, consisting of a sleeve gastrectomy (SG) followed by loop gastroileostomy. Therefore, we aimed to systematically assess all the current literature on SASI bypass in terms of safety, weight loss, improvement in associated comorbidities, and complications.

METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). We performed a meta-analysis of risk ratios and mean differences to compare surgical approaches for excessive weight loss, improvement/remission in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension (HT), dyslipidemia (DL), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and complications. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis and four in the quantitative analysis, comparing SASI bypass with SG and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB). A comparison between Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and SASI bypass could not be performed. Compared to SG, the SASI bypass was associated with improved weight loss (MD = 11.32; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) [7.89;14.76]; p < 0.0001), and improvement or remission in T2DM (RR = 1.35; 95%CI [1.07;1.69]; p = 0.011), DL (RR = 1.41; 95%CI [1.00;1.99]; p = 0.048) and OSA (RR = 1.50; 95%CI [1.01;2.22]; p = 0.042). No statistically significant differences in any of the assessed outcomes were observed when compared with OAGB. When compared to both SG and OAGB, the complication rate of SASI was similar.

CONCLUSION

Although studies with longer follow-up periods are needed, this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that SASI bypass has a significant effect on weight loss and metabolic variables. Variations in outcomes between studies reinforce the need for standardization.

Laparoscopic single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass in the surgical management of morbid obesity: A single‐centre experience

Background

Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass is a recently developed two‐step bariatric operation that involves a sleeve gastrectomy followed by a side‐to‐side sleeve‐ileal anastomosis. While the primary outcomes are promising, more evidence is required before SASI can be considered a standard bariatric procedure.

Objective

This study aims to evaluate short‐term outcomes of SASI bypass regarding safety, efficacy and complications.

Methods

This retrospective study involved the analysis of 75 patients who underwent SASI between January 2019 and January 2022. The study examined patients’ characteristics, comorbidities, surgical technique, operative details, post‐operative weight loss and complications.

Results

Of the 88 patients who underwent SASI, 13 were excluded, leaving 75 participants for analysis. The mean age was 36.9 ± 8.3 years, and the mean body mass index was 49.23 ± 5.5 kg/m2. Among the participants, 19 patients (25.3%) had diabetes and 8 patients (10.6%) had hypertension. The mean operative time was 78.42 ± 13.18 min. The mean excess weight loss percentage was 25.53 ± 3.63, 43.33 ± 8.78, 63.51 ± 10.85, 82.11 ± 11.42 and 88.95 ± 8.69 at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. The diabetic remission rate was 100%, and the hypertension remission rate was 75%. Post‐operative complications were observed in 12 patients (16%), with most being minor. Notably, two patients underwent SASI reversal to sleeve gastrectomy due to excessive weight loss, and one patient experienced weight regain in the second post‐operative year.

Conclusion

SASI bypass emerges as a straightforward and highly effective bariatric procedure, with an acceptable complication rate. It is easy to perform and revise, offering not only excellent and sustained weight loss outcomes during short‐term follow‐up but also the resolution or improvement of obesity‐associated comorbidities.

Outcomes of single anastomosis duodeno ileal bypass and single anastomosis stomach ileal bypass for type II diabetes: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery has demonstrated long-term effectiveness in inducing weight loss and improving metabolic parameters for obesity. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal (SADI) bypass and single anastomosis sleeve-ileal (SASI) bypass have both emerged as new promising bariatric procedures. In this paper, we review the existing literature and compare the outcomes of SADI and SASI bypass procedures in regard to weight loss, complication rate, and improvement of type II diabetes (T2DM). This has not yet been done in the preexisting literature.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a systematic literature search of electronic databases focusing on weight loss outcomes, rate of complications and remission, or improvement of T2DM and other obesity-related comorbidities. Seventeen studies on SADI and nine studies on SASI were included. Both are similar in terms of surgical technique and have demonstrated fewer complications when compared to other bariatric procedures. Mean preoperative BMI was similar in both study groups: 46.4 kg/m2 in SADI and 48.8 kg/m2 in SASI. Mean %EWL at 12 months in the SADI group was 74.1% compared to 77.4% in the SASI group. Preoperative severity of T2DM appeared to be higher in the SASI patient group, with a higher preoperative HbA1c and fasting blood glucose levels. T2DM resolution was achieved in a significant proportion of both SADI and SASI patient populations (78.5% in SADI and 89.0% in SASI). Complication rates were comparable for both procedures.

EXPERT OPINION

Both SADI and SASI are effective in inducing weight loss at 12 months, with a low rate of major complications and mortality. From the studies included in this review, the SASI procedure had a higher impact on T2DM resolution compared to SADI.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With Transit Loop Bipartition and Transit Bipartition in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Obesity: A Retrospective Analysis

AIM

We aimed to compare 1-year postoperative results of patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (LSG-TB) and transit loop bipartition (LSG-TLB) and mini gastric bypass (MGB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective comparison of 2 novel bariatric surgery techniques with MGB. Primary outcome measure of the study was a rate of T2DM remission. Secondary outcomes included excess body mass index (BMI) loss, improvement in hepatosteatosis, and duration of operation. Revision surgery needs were also assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 32 patients underwent the LSG-TLB, 15 underwent LSG-TB, and 50 underwent MGB. Mean age and sex distribution were comparable for all groups. Presurgical BMI was similar in MGB and LSG + TB groups, whereas LSG + TLB group had significantly lower BMI values compared with the MGB group. In both groups, BMI values reduced significantly compared with respective baseline values. Excess BMI loss was significantly higher in patients who underwent LSG-TLB compared with patients treated with LSG-TB and MGB. Bariatric surgery procedures lasted shorter in LSG-TLB than in LSG-TB. However, the shortest of all was MGB. The remission of T2DM rates were 71% and 73.3% in LSG-TLB and LSG-TB groups, respectively ( P > 9.999). The rate of revision surgeries was comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, LSG-TLB took less time and provided significantly higher excess BMI loss compared with LSG-TB. T2DM remission and improvement rates were similar in both groups. LSG-TLB seemed like a promising bariatric surgery technique in patients with obesity and T2DM.

Optimal Length of Biliopancreatic Limb in Single Anastomosis Sleeve Gastrointestinal Bypass for Treatment of Severe Obesity: Efficacy and Concerns

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to compare two newly introduced procedures, single anastomosis sleeve jejunal (SASJ) with ileal (SASI) bypass in terms of weight loss, remission of obesity-associated medical problems, complications, and nutritional status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was carried out with 162 patients who underwent single anastomosis sleeve gastrointestinal bypass from October 2017 to September 2021, either single anastomosis sleeve jejunal bypass (SASJ) or single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI). The main outcome measures were weight loss and improvement in obesity-associated medical problems, nutritional status, and complications at 12 months post-surgery.

RESULTS

At 12 months, both groups showed significant weight loss and remission in obesity-associated medical problems. There were significant differences in body mass index (BMI), total weight loss (TWL), and excess weight loss (EWL) between SASI and SASJ bypass (P < 0.05). Improvements in associated medical problems after the two procedures were similar except for hypertension. The reversal surgery rate of the SASI group was significantly higher than that of the SASJ group (5.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

SASJ and SASI bypass achieved satisfactory weight loss and improvement in obesity-associated medical problems that were comparable between the two groups. SASI bypass was followed by a significant difference in the rate of reversal surgery at 1 year due to a short common channel, which was not observed after SASJ bypass.

Systematic review of the outcome of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass in treatment of morbid obesity with proportion meta-analysis of improvement in diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass has emerged as a promising bariatric and metabolic procedure. We aimed to review the current literature on the outcome of SASI procedure in terms of weight loss, improvement in comorbidities, and complications.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search, querying electronic databases and Google Scholar, for studies that reported the outcome of the SASI bypass. The main outcome measures of the review were change in body mass index (BMI), % of excess weight loss (%EWL), improvement in comorbidities, and complications after SASI bypass.

RESULTS

This systematic review comprised ten studies including 941 patients with a median BMI of 45.6 kg/m2. The median %EWL at 6 months was 59.4% and significantly (p = 0.04) increased to 90.1% at 12 months. The weighted mean rate of improvement in diabetes mellitus was 99.1 (95%CI: 98.2-99.9, I2 = 0). The crude percentages of patients with improvement in hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease were 51%, 76.6%, and 92%, respectively. The median operation time was 111.3, ranging between 75 and 148.4 min. Complications were recorded in 116 (12.3%) patients. Longer common limb was associated with less %EWL at 6 months and less complications whereas larger anastomosis size was associated with higher weight loss and greater improvement in hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

SASI bypass was associated with good short-term outcomes in regard to weight loss and improvement in comorbidities, namely diabetes mellitus with an acceptably low complication rate.