The role of a multidisciplinary approach in the choice of the best surgery approach in a super-super-obesity case

Liraglutide effectiveness in preoperative weight-loss for patients with severe obesity undergoing bariatric-metabolic surgery

Preoperative management of patients living with severe obesity can be challenging; in this context, the preoperative weight loss may help to obtain better outcomes and less morbidity for bariatric surgery. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness of GLP-1 analogue Liraglutide in preoperative weight loss. We performed a single-center, quasi-experimental prospective study. Eligible participants were adults in preoperative management for bariatric-metabolic surgery with body-mass index ≥ 48 kg/m2. All patients were assigned liraglutide treatment, with an initial dose of 0.6 mg subcutaneous per day, the dose was increased each week until reaching 3.0 mg for 12 weeks. Weight loss and body composition were evaluated monthly using bioelectric impedance (BIA) (InBody 770 Scale®). We analyzed data using descriptive statistics, central tendency measures and dispersion for quantitative variables and absolute and relative frequencies for qualitative variables. A total of 37 individuals were included in this study, 28 (76%) were female and 9 (24%) were males, with an average age of 44 years. About the BMI, 19 patients (51%) had a BMI > 50 kg/m2, 10 (27%) > 40 kg/m2 and 8 (22%) > 60 kg/m2; with a total average BMI of 56.04 kg/m2. The initial weight was 147.4 ± 14.9 kg which decreased to 139.3 ± 16.8 kg; after 3 months of liraglutide administration. A total of 35 patients had some degree of weight loss (94.6%), while 2 (5.40%) had no weight changes. The total weight loss was 5.50% at 3 months of liraglutide treatment. Liraglutide could be an effective adjuvant therapy for preoperative weight loss in patients living with severe obesity.

The current status and challenges of perioperative management of patients with a BMI of greater than or equal to 50 kg/m 2 undergoing bariatric surgery in China: a multicenter cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Performing bariatric surgery on patients with a BMI of over 50 kg/m 2 is challenging. This study aimed to explore the status and challenges related to the perioperative management of such patients in China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective survey was designed to investigate the perioperative management of patients with a BMI of greater than or equal to 50 kg/m 2 undergoing bariatric surgery in China. The questionnaire of our survey included general information, preoperative management measures, surgical procedures performed, technical details regarding anaesthesia, and postoperative management measures. A response from only one attending physician per bariatric centre was accepted.

RESULTS

Physicians from a total of 101 hospitals responded to the questionnaire, and the questionnaire data from 98 hospitals were complete. These centres had completed a total of 44 702 bariatric surgeries since the launch of such surgery to December 2021. A total of 3280 patients had a BMI exceeding 50 kg/m 2 . The preferred surgical procedures for patients with super obesity were sleeve gastrectomy by 62 centres, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass by 11 centres, sleeve gastrectomy plus jejunojejunal bypass by 19 centres, one anastomosis gastric bypass by 1 centre, and duodenal switch by 1 centre. The most worrying issues were cardiopulmonary failure and difficulty in extubation. 91 centres believed that preoperative weight loss was beneficial. A low-calorie diet was the specific measure mainly implemented, only three centres considered using intragastric balloon placement. Postoperative management measures varied greatly.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery has seen rapid development. Chinese physicians show significant differences regarding the perioperative management for patients with a BMI of over 50 kg/m 2 . The perioperative risks of these patients remain relatively high, making further development of clinical pathways is necessary.

Intragastric balloons for obesity: critical review of device design, efficacy, tolerability, and unmet clinical needs

INTRODUCTION

Sustaining a healthy weight is a challenge and obesity, with associated risk of co-morbidities, is a major public health concern. Bariatric surgery has shown a great promise for many where pharmacological and lifestyle interventions failed to work. However, challenges and limitations associated with bariatric surgery has pushed the demand for less invasive, reversible (anatomically) interventions, such as intragastric balloons (IGBs).

AREAS COVERED

This review critically appraises IGBs used in the past, present, and those in clinical trials, discussing the device designs, limitations, placement and removal techniques, patient eligibility, efficacy, and safety issues.

EXPERT OPINION

Several intragastric balloons were developed over the years that brought excitement to patients and healthcare professionals alike. Albeit good efficacy, there had been several safety issues reported with IGBs such as spontaneous deflation, intestinal occlusion, gut perforation, and mucosal ulcerations. This led to evolution of IGBs design; device material, filling mechanism, fluid type, inflation volume, and further innovations to ease ingestion and removal of device. There are some IGB devices under development aimed to swallow like a conventional pill and excrete naturally through defecation, however, how successful they will be in clinical practice in terms of their efficacy and tolerability remains to be seen in the future.

Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery: Patients with Body Mass Index 60 or Greater

Introduction:

Perioperative outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with super super obesity (SSO) (BMI ≥ 60 kg/m²) merit further investigation.

Methods:

A retrospective review was conducted of patients with SSO who underwent surgery from Jun 2005 through Jun 2018 at a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Center of Excellence. Quantitative demographic data was summarized using descriptive statistics; categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test.

Results:

Two hundred fourteen procedures were performed, of which 208 were eligible for inclusion. Majority were female (65.4%). The mean age and BMI was 43 (17–68 years) and 65.9 kg/m² (60 95 kg/m²), respectively. Comorbidities included: obstructive sleep apnea (74%), hypertension (59%), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (43%), osteoarthritis (41%), and diabetes mellitus (30%). Surgical approach: 97 Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses (46%), 88 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies (42%), and 23 adjustable gastric bands (11%). Additional subset included: primary (87%), conversion (7.7%), and revision (5.3%); majority being laparoscopic (75%) and robotic (24%). Complications via Clavien-Dindo classification: one Grade I, one Grade II, three Grade IIIa, three Grade IIIb, and three Grade IVa. Thirty-day events: 11 complications (5.3%; one leak [0.5%], one deep vein thrombosis [0.5%]), six re-admissions (3%), four re-operations (2%): repair of staple-line leak, repair of incisional hernia, uterine dilation and curettage, and cholecystectomy. No mortalities occurred. Complications occurred in 14.8% of conversion/revision cases, 3.9% in primary cases (p = 0.0395) with no difference observed between laparoscopic (4.5%) and robotic (6.1%) modalities (p = 0.7051).

Conclusion:

Bariatric surgery is feasible in patients with SSO. Revision procedures may increase risk of operative complications.

Optimising the Bariatric Patients' Outcome through Cardiac Rehabilitation Approach

Bariatric surgery offers a therapeutic alternative with favourable weight management, cardiovascular, metabolic and functional outcomes. Bariatric individuals often have functional impairments pre-operatively that can be addressed to improve post-operative results and eventual functional independence. Multidisciplinary team offers the best approach to address peri-operative needs and sustainable weight loss thereafter. We exemplified the application of cardiac rehabilitation therapeutic model in managing two bariatric clients with specific bariatric-related challenges. Our approach focuses on adaptive physical activity, sustainable lifestyle changes to promote post-operative weight loss through education and problem solving as well as secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Putting emphasis on addressing physical and psychosocial barriers towards physical activity alongside nutritional aspects potentially confers sustained if not better outcomes on weight reduction and functional improvement.

Evaluation of Weight Loss Indicators and Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Outcomes

Mini-gastric bypass/One-anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) is an effective bariatric technique for treating overweight and obesity, controlling and improving excess-weight-related comorbidities. Our study evaluated OAGB characteristics and resulting weight evolution, plus surgical success criteria based on various excess weight loss indicators. A prospective observational study of 100 patients undergoing OAGB performed by the same surgical team (two-year follow-up). Surgical characteristics were: surgery duration, associated complications, bowel loop length, hospital stay, and weight loss at 6 postoperative points. 100 patients were treated (71 women, 29 men); mean initial age was 42.61 years and mean BMI, 42.61 ± 6.66 kg/m². Mean surgery duration was 97.84 ± 12.54 minutes; biliopancreatic loop length was 274.95 ± 23.69 cm. Average hospital stay was 24 hours in 98% of patients; no surgical complications arose. Weight decreased significantly during follow-up (P < 0.001). Greatest weight loss was observed at 12 months postsurgery (68.56 ± 13.10 kg). Relative weight loss showed significant positive correlation, with greatest weight loss at 12 months and %excess BMI loss > 50% achieved from the 3-month follow-up in 92.46% of patients. OAGB seems to be effective in treating obesity, with short hospital stays. Relative weight loss correlates optimally with absolute outcomes, but both measures should be used to evaluate surgical results.

One-Stage vs Two-Stage Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Obese Patients with Body Mass Index >55 Kg/m2; 5-YEAR FOLLOW UP

BACKGROUND

Surgical strategies in patients with BMI > 55 kg/m² are not well established.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to compare the long term results and complications of 1- vs. 2-stage laparoscopic "Roux-en-Y″ gastric bypass (LRYGB) for patients with BMI > 55 kg/m².

METHODS

Retrospective review of the complications and outcomes, between January 2007 and January 2010, for patients with a BMI > 55 kg/m² who underwent directly a LRYGB (1-stage) or a LRYGB as a 2nd stage of a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled (no patient was lost during the 5-year follow-up). In the 1-stage LRYGB group, two patients had grade II complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification. In the 2-stage LRYGB group, complications of the first and the second surgery were summed. There were no differences between the two groups despite being heterogenous (more men with a higher BMI in the 2-stage group). There was a statistically significant difference in the final BMI in 1-stage LRYGB group compared to the 2-stage LRYGB group (34.46 ± 6.29 vs. 40.40 ± 3.47; p = 0.01, respectively) and in percentage of excess of BMI loss (%EBMIL; 69.80 ± 19.96 vs. 54.54 ± 13.93; p = 0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a BMI > 55 kg/m², both 1- and 2-stage LRYGB give good long-term results. If feasible, a 1-stage LRYGB obtains a better percentage of excess of BMI loss but if not possible, the strategy of initially performing a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy followed by a LRYGB is safe and there were no differences in complications.

Robot-assisted surgery in elderly and very elderly population: our experience in oncologic and general surgery with literature review

BACKGROUND

Although there is no agreement on a definition of elderly, commonly an age cutoff of ≥65 or 75 years is used. Nowadays most of malignancies requiring surgical treatment are diagnosed in old population. Comorbidities and frailty represent well-known problems during and after surgery in elderly patients. Minimally invasive surgery offers earlier postoperative mobilization, less blood loss, lower morbidity as well as reduction in hospital stay and as such represents an interesting and validated option for elderly population. Robot-assisted surgery is a recent improvement of conventional minimally invasive surgery.

AIMS

We provided a complete review of old and very old patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery for oncologic and general surgery interventions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery in our General Surgery Unit from September 2012 to June 2016 was conducted. Analysis was performed for the entire cohort and in particular for three of the most performed surgeries (gastric resections, right colectomy, and liver resections) classifying patients into three age groups: ≤64, 65-79, and ≥80. Data from these three different age groups were compared and examined in respect of different outcomes: ASA score, comorbidities, oncologic outcomes, conversion rate, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, geriatric events, mortality, etc.

RESULTS

Using our in-patient robotic surgery database, we retrospectively examined 363 patients, who underwent robot-assisted surgery for different diseases (402 different robotic procedures): colorectal surgery, upper GI, HPB, etc.; the oncologic procedures were 81%. Male were 56%. The mean age was 65.63 years (18-89). Patients aged ≥65 years represented 61% and ≥80 years 13%. Overall conversion rate was of 6%, most in the group 65-79 years (59% of all conversions). The more frequent diseases treated were colorectal surgery 43%, followed by hepatobilopancreatic surgery 23.4%, upper gastro-intestinal 23.2%, and others 10.4%.

DISCUSSION

Robot-assisted surgery is a safe and effective technique in aging patient population too. There was no increased risk of death or morbidity compared to younger patients in the three groups examined. A higher conversion rate was observed in our experience for patients aged 65-79. Prolonged operative time and in any cases steep positions (Trendelenburg) have not represented a problem for the majority of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In any case, considering the high direct costs, minimally invasive robot-assisted surgery should be performed on a case-by-case basis, tailored to each patient with their specific histories and comorbidities.

Sleeve Gastrectomy in Different Age Groups: a Comparative Study of 5-Year Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been used more frequently over the past 10 years. As the population ages, a larger number of older people will suffer from weight-related comorbidities, resulting in bariatric surgery becoming a dominant solution for improving health and quality of life. We assessed the long-term outcomes of LSG in elderly patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent LSG between January 2007 and August 2009. We subdivided 123 patients into <35 (n = 43), 35-55 (n = 59), and >55 (n = 21) age groups.

RESULTS

The respective mean excess body mass index loss and excess weight loss were 42.5% ± 3.1% and 41.3% ± 12.3% for the <35 age group, 48.7% ± 4.1% and 45.6% ± 10.6% for the 35-55 age group, and 53.6% ± 4.6% and 52.1% ± 11.1% for the >55 age group. The follow-up compliance rates at the 5-year visit were 23.85, 31.11, and 47.61% for the <35, 35-55, and >55 age groups, respectively. The corresponding Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System scores were 3.7 ± 1.1, 4.0 ± 0.7, and 5.3 ± 1.3. The comorbidities of all the patients improved significantly, with a non-significant distribution between the three groups for each comorbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

LSG is a useful tool for people who want to modify their eating habits and lose weight healthily. This study suggests that long-term weight loss, improvements in comorbidity, and compliance to follow-up are significant for patients >55 years old.

Tailored treatment of intestinal angiodysplasia in elderly

BACKGROUND

Angiodysplasia of the gastrointestinal tract is an uncommon, but not rare, cause of bleeding and severe anemia in elderly. Different treatments exist for this kind of pathology.

METHODS

The aim of this work was to study 40 patients treated for intestinal angiodysplasia with two different kind of endoscopic treatments: argon plasma coagulation (APC) and bipolar electrocoagulation (BEC).

RESULTS

Age of patients was similar in both groups (76,2 ± 10.8 years vs 74,8 ± 8,7 years, P = 0,005). Angiodysplasia treated were located in small bowel, right colon, left colon, transverse colon and cecum. We analysed number of treatment, recurrence, hospital discharge, needs of blood transfusions before and after endoscopic treatment. Number of treatment was the same in both groups (1,2 ± 0,2 vs 1,1 ± 0,1, P < 0,001). We had more recurrence in patients treated with BEC (4/20 vs 2/20, P < 0,001). Hospital discharge was comparable in both groups (5,3 ± 3,1 days vs 5,4 ± 2,8 years, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of angiodysplasia in elderly is not easy. Different kinds of treatment could be adopted. APC and BEC are both safe and effective. The choice of a treatment should consider several factors: age, comorbidity, source of bleeding. In conclusion we think that treatment of bleeding for angiodysplasia in elder population should be a tailored treatment.

WHEN AND WHY OPERATE ELDERLY OBESE

INTRODUCTION

Concurrently with the pandemic obesity is observed global aging phenomenon, with a significant increase of obesity in the elderly population.

AIM

To review the indications for bariatric surgery for the elderly, mainly focusing on the morbidity and mortality of procedures.

METHOD

Review of the literature in PubMed/Medline and Scielo focusing on the relationship of risk factors with different techniques of bariatric surgery in the elderly. The following descriptors were crossed in the form of AND/OR: Obesity; Bariatric surgery; Complications; Elderly.

CONCLUSION

In people older than 60 years bariatric procedures represent acceptable and effective treatment option. The elderly should be treated in specialized centers with experience in major surgical procedures and low morbimortality. Going in this way, they experience the benefits of bariatric surgery with acceptable morbidity and mortality. However, age alone should not be considered as an absolute impediment for surgical indication.

Bariatric surgery in elderly patients. A comparison between gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy with five years of follow up

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of obesity is rising progressively, even among elderly patients. Many studies investigated about safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery among aged obese patients. The objective of this review is to assess the benefits relative to risks of weight loss that may be obtained by performing two common bariatric procedures in obese elderly patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 10 morbid obese patients older than 60 years reaching 5 years of follow up who respectively underwent Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) or Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB). Eventual changes in comorbidities, weight loss, EWL% were investigated.

RESULTS

Although LSG patients required a longer postoperative hospital stay than LAGB patients (p < 0.001), both procedures have shown to be safe and equally effective for weight loss achievement in elderly patients. Whereas all patients showed comorbidities resolution, no significant difference in weight loss between LAGB group and LSG group was found at 1 year (EWL% p = 0.87; BMI p = 0.32), 3 years (EWL% p = 0.62; BMI p = 0.79) and 5 years (EWL% p = 0.52; BMI p = 0.46) of follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric surgery is safe and effective to reach obesity related comorbidities resolution among elderly obese patients. Both LAGB and LSG determine a weight loss lesser than observed in a standard bariatric population. In this study LSG is significantly less cost effective than LAGB. Larger studies with longer follow up are however needed to evaluate the real impact of bariatric surgery on weight loss, resolution of comorbidities and improvement of quality of life in elderly obese patients.