Redefining major hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: Analysis of 1111 liver resections

Preoperative risk score for 90-day mortality after major liver resection

BACKGROUND

Major liver resection is frequently performed for primary and secondary liver tumors. However, 90-day mortality rates can exceed 10% in high-risk patients. This study aimed to develop a preoperative risk score for postoperative mortality after major liver resection.

METHODS

All major liver resections between 2014 and 2019 in 2 Dutch tertiary referral centers were identified. A validation cohort consisted of all consecutive patients who underwent a major liver resection in the nationwide Dutch Hepato Biliary Audit from 2014 to 2020. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify prognostic factors and develop a mortality risk score.

RESULTS

Major liver resection was performed in 513 patients, of whom 238 (46.4%) had a primary liver cancer, and in 148 patients (28.8%), a hepaticojejunostomy was performed; 90-day mortality occurred in 56 patients (10.8%). Mortality was independently predicted by 5 risk factors: age ≥ 65 years, diabetes mellitus type 2, diagnosis of primary liver cancer, American Society of Anesthesiologists ≥ 3, and extended hemihepatectomy. A risk score with 1 point assigned to each risk factor showed good discrimination (area under the curve [AUC], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.83). The predicted 90-day mortality was 3.5% for low-risk (0 or 1 points; 53.8% of all patients), 11.1% for intermediate-risk (2 points; 25.3%), and 29.7% for high-risk patients (3-5 points; 20.9%). External validation in the nationwide cohort with 1617 patients showed similar concordance (AUC, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.64-0.75).

CONCLUSION

The proposed and validated risk score can aid in shared decision making.

Propensity score matching analysis of perioperative outcomes during Hub&Spoke training program in hepato-biliary surgery

This study aims to verify the safety and effectiveness of complex surgical procedures like hepato-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgery also in General Surgery Units when performing an Hub&Spoke Learning Program (H&S) with a referral center. This approach leads reduction of health migration and related costs for patients and health system granting the same standard of medical and surgical care in Spoke Units. Implementation of H&S through a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected database comparing, after a Propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis, baseline characteristics and peri-operative outcomes of patients undergone HPB surgery in a referral center (Hub) and in three peripheral centers (Spokes) under the mentoring program. Hub Hospital was represented by the Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Center in Pineta Grande Hospital (Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy), while the Spoke Units were the General Surgery Unit of Padre Pio Hospital (Mondragone, Caserta, Italy), the General Surgery Unit of C.T.O. Hospital (Naples, Italy) and the General and Emergency Surgery Unit of A. Cardarelli Hospital, University of Molise (Campobasso, Italy). During the partnership program, from January 2016 to June 2023, H&S enrolled 298 and 156 consecutive patients respectively. After PSM, data of 150 patients for each group were analyzed. After PSM no differences were found concerning patients baseline characteristics. Hub group selected more often primary liver cancers versus benign lesions and liver metastasis more frequent in the Spoke group. All peri-operative data were superimposable except for blood transfusion, Pringle maneuver and length of hospital stay that were more frequent in the Hub group. We can conclude that the treatment of liver cancers in peripheral centers is possible, safe and effective especially under a H&S. There are some requisites to be successful like experienced surgeon(s), interdisciplinary meetings to discuss and minimum requirements in each hospital such as Intensive Care Unit, interventional radiology and emergency facilities.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications Following Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases and the Impact on Long-Term Survival: A Population-Based National Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative complications (POCs) following resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are common. The objective of this study was to evaluate risk factors for developing complications and their impact on survival considering prognostic factors of the primary tumor, metastatic pattern and treatment in a well-defined national cohort.

METHODS

Patients treated with resection for CRLM that was also radically resected for their primary colorectal cancer (diagnosed in 2009-2013) were identified in Swedish national registers. Liver resections were categorized according to extent of surgery (Category I-IV). Risk factors for developing POCs as well as prognostic impact of POCs were evaluated in multivariable analyses. A subgroup analysis of minor resections was performed to evaluate POCs after laparoscopic surgery.

RESULTS

POCs were registered for 24% (276/1144) of all patients after CRLM resection. Major resection was a risk factor for POCs in multivariable analysis (IRR 1.76; P = 0.001). Comparing laparoscopic and open resections in the subgroup analysis of small resections, 6% (4/68) in the laparoscopic group developed POCs compared to 18% (51/289) after open resection (IRR 0.32; P = 0.024). POCs were associated with a 27% increased excess mortality rate (EMRR 1.27; P = 0.044). However, primary tumor characteristics, tumor burden in the liver, extrahepatic spread, extent of liver resection and radicality had higher impact on survival.

CONCLUSION

Minimal invasive resections were associated with a decreased risk of POCs following resection of CRLM which should be considered in surgical strategy. Postoperative complications were associated with a moderate risk for inferior survival.

Association of Simultaneous vs Delayed Resection of Liver Metastasis With Complications and Survival Among Adults With Colorectal Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Simultaneous or delayed resection of synchronous liver metastasis (SLM) with primary colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a controversial topic.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcomes of simultaneous vs delayed resection in patients with resectable SLM.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This comparative effectiveness research study included 1569 patients with resectable SLM who underwent curative-intent liver resection at 3 independent centers in China between January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed. Follow-up was completed on August 31, 2021, and the data were analyzed from April 1 to 30, 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcome was the percentage of patients with at least 1 major complication within 60 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates.

RESULTS

Among the 1569 patients included, 1057 (67.4%) underwent delayed resection (719 men [68.0%] with a mean [SD] age of 57.4 [11.2] years), and 512 patients (310 men [60.5%] with a mean [SD] age of 57.1 [10.5] years) underwent simultaneous resection. Matching yielded 495 pairs of patients underwent simultaneous resection. The percentage of major perioperative complications did not differ between the simultaneous and delayed resection groups (34.1% vs 30.0%; P = .89). The OS rates were 65.2% at 3 years, 47.1% at 5 years, and 38.0% at 8 years for the delayed resection group and 78.0% at 3 years, 65.4% at 5 years, and 63.1% at 8 years for the simultaneous resection group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.10-1.85, P = .003). The CSS rates were 68.3% at 3 years, 48.5% at 5 years, and 37.1% at 8 years for the delayed resection group and 79.2% at 3 years, 67.2% at 5 years, and 65.9% at 8 years for the simultaneous resection group (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.14-1.98; P = .004). On subgroup analysis comparing the 2 strategies according to the KRAS sequence variation status, the OS rates (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.45-2.18; P < .001) and CSS rates (HR, 1.62; 95 CI, 1.40-1.87; P = .003]) in the simultaneous resection group were significantly better than those in the delayed resection group in patients with KRAS wild-type tumors.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Results of this study suggest that complication rates did not differ when CRC and SLM were resected simultaneously and that the survival benefits of simultaneous resection were restricted to patients with KRAS wild-type tumors. Integrating molecular features into the treatment decision is a basis for accurate, individualized treatments.

The efficacy and safety of acetaminophen use following liver resection: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Acetaminophen is commonly used for post-operative analgesia following liver resection. It is metabolised by the liver and appropriate administration and dosage is in question in in patients undergoing hepatectomy. A systematic review was conducted to investigate safety and efficacy of acetaminophen use.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for instances of toxicity, liver dysfunction, and analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing hepatectomy.

RESULTS

Two randomised controlled trials and four prospective observational studies were included. The studies were of moderate quality. Four studies investigated post-operative levels of acetaminophen and its urinary metabolites, finding no evidence of toxicity. One study noted that glutathione levels decreased but not to clinically deficient levels. Administration of acetaminophen plus morphine versus morphine alone did not increase adverse events and a morphine sparing effect of acetaminophen was demonstrated in two studies.

CONCLUSION

Use of acetaminophen for adult patients undergoing liver resection surgery as post-operative analgesia at a standard dosage is safe for baseline analgesia. All studies analysed support that toxicity is not reached; and that acetaminophen provides a morphine sparing effect without adverse effects. Acetaminophen dose reduction should be considered in patients where extra risk factors for hepatotoxicity are present.

Stratification of Major Hepatectomies According to Their Outcome: Analysis of 2212 Consecutive Open Resections in Patients Without Cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

To stratify major hepatectomies (MajHs) according to their outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

MajHs are associated with non-negligible operative risks, but they include a wide range of procedures. Detailed depiction of the outcomes of different MajHs is the basis for a new classification of liver resections.

METHODS

We retrospectively considered patients that underwent hepatectomy in 17 high-volume centers. Patients with an associated digestive/biliary resection were excluded. We analyzed open MajHs in non-cirrhotic patients. MajHs were classified according to the Brisbane nomenclature. Right hepatectomies (RHs) were reference standards. Outcomes were adjusted for potential confounders, including indication, liver function, preoperative portal vein embolization, and enrolling center.

RESULTS

We analyzed a series of 2212 patients. In comparison with RH, left hepatectomy had lower mortality [0.6% vs 2.2%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.25], severe morbidity (11.7% vs 14.4%, OR = 0.62), and liver failure rates (2.1% vs 11.6%, OR = 0.16). Left hepatectomy+Sg1 and mesohepatectomy+/-Sg1 had outcomes similar to RH, except for higher bile leak rate (31.3% and 13.5% vs 6.7%, OR = 4.36 and OR = 2.29). RH + Sg1 had slightly worse outcomes than RH. Right and left trisectionectomies had higher mortality (5.0% and 7.3% vs 2.2%, OR = 2.07 and OR = 2.71) and liver failure rates than RH (19.0% and 22.0% vs 11.6%, OR = 2.03 and OR = 2.21). Left trisectionectomy had even higher severe morbidity (25.6% vs 14.4%, OR = 2.07) and bile leak rates (14.6% vs 6.7%, OR = 2.31).

CONCLUSIONS

The term "major hepatectomy" includes resections having heterogeneous outcome. Different MajHs can be stratified according to their mortality, severe morbidity, liver failure, and bile leak rates.

Comparison of the Extent Classification and the New Complexity Classification of Hepatectomy for Prediction of Surgical Outcomes: a Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

In predicting the risk for posthepatectomy complications, hepatectomy is traditionally classified into minor or major resection based on the number of resected segments. Recently, a new hepatectomy complexity classification was proposed. This study aimed to compare the value of the traditional and that of the new classification in perioperative outcomes prediction.

METHODS

Demographics, perioperative laboratory tests, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and follow-up data of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent liver resection were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 302 patients were included in our study. Multivariable analysis of intraoperative variables showed that the complexity classification could independently predict the occurrence of blood loss > 800 mL, operation time > 4 h, intraoperative transfusion, and the use of Pringle's maneuver (all p < 0.05). For postoperative outcomes, the high-complexity group was independently associated with severe complications, and hepatic-related complications (all p < 0.05); the traditional classification was independently associated only with posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Complexity classification could be used to assess the difficulty of surgery and was independently associated with postoperative complications. The traditional classification did not reflect operation complexity and was associated only with PHLF.

The Post-SIR-Spheres Surgery Study (P4S): Retrospective Analysis of Safety Following Hepatic Resection or Transplantation in Patients Previously Treated with Selective Internal Radiation Therapy with Yttrium-90 Resin Microspheres

BACKGROUND

Reports show that selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) may downsize inoperable liver tumors to resection or transplantation, or enable a bridge-to-transplant. A small-cohort study found that long-term survival in patients undergoing resection following SIRT appears possible but no robust studies on postsurgical safety outcomes exist. The Post-SIR-Spheres Surgery Study was an international, multicenter, retrospective study to assess safety outcomes of liver resection or transplantation following SIRT with yttrium-90 (Y-90) resin microspheres (SIR-Spheres^®; Sirtex).

METHODS

Data were captured retrospectively at participating SIRT centers, with Y-90 resin microspheres, surgery (resection or transplantation), and follow-up for all eligible patients. Primary endpoints were perioperative and 90-day postoperative morbidity and mortality. Standard statistical methods were used.

RESULTS

The study included 100 patients [hepatocellular carcinoma: 49; metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): 30; cholangiocarcinoma, metastatic neuroendocrine tumor, other: 7 each]; 36% of patients had one or more lines of chemotherapy pre-SIRT. Sixty-three percent of patients had comorbidities, including hypertension (44%), diabetes (26%), and cardiopathy (16%). Post-SIRT, 71 patients were resected and 29 received a liver transplant. Grade 3+ peri/postoperative complications and any grade of liver failure were experienced by 24 and 7% of patients, respectively. Four patients died <90 days postsurgery; all were trisectionectomies (mCRC: 3; cholangiocarcinoma: 1) and typically had one or more previous chemotherapy lines and presurgical comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

In 100 patients undergoing liver surgery after receiving SIRT, mortality and complication rates appeared acceptable given the risk profile of the recruited patients.

Imaging oligometastatic cancer before local treatment

With the advent of novel treatment strategies to help widen the therapeutic window for patients with oligometastatic cancer, improved biomarkers are needed to reliably define patients who can benefit from these treatments. Multimodal imaging is one such option and should be optimised to comprehensively assess metastatic sites, disease burden, and response to neoadjuvant treatment in each disease setting. These features will probably remain important prognostic biomarkers, and are crucial in planning multidisciplinary treatment. There are opportunities to extract additional phenotypic information from conventional imaging, while novel imaging techniques can also reveal specific aspects of tumour biology. Imaging can both characterise and localise the phenotypic heterogeneity of multiple tumour sites. Novel approaches to existing imaging datasets and correlation with tumour biology will be important in realising the potential of imaging to guide treatment in the oligometastatic setting. In this Personal View, we discuss the current status and future directions of imaging before treatment in patients with extracranial oligometastases.

Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery for Hepatic Colorectal Metastases

Minimally invasive surgery has been cautiously introduced in surgical oncology over the last two decades due to a concern of compromised oncological outcomes. Recently, it has been adopted in liver surgery for colorectal metastases. Colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related death in the USA. In addition, liver metastasis is the most common site of distant disease and its resection improves survival. While open resection was the standard of care, laparoscopic liver surgery has become the standard of care for minor liver resections. Laparoscopic liver surgery provides equivalent oncological outcomes with better perioperative results compared to open liver surgery. Robotic liver surgery has been introduced as it is believed to overcome some of the limitations of laparoscopy. Finally, laparoscopic radio-frequency ablation and microwave coagulation can be used as adjuncts in minimally invasive surgery to complement or replace surgical resection when not possible.