Hysterectomy and salphingoopherectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery(NOTES): Turkish surgeons' initial experience

vNOTES chromopertubation: a new method for assessing tubal patency and peritubal anatomy

BACKGROUND

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with suspected tubal factor infertility who underwent vaginal natural orifice endoluminal surgery (vNOTES) chromopertubation and adnexal anatomy assessment at a large referral hospital.

METHODS

Twelve women aged between 29 and 38 years with suspected tubal factor infertility who underwent vNOTES chromopertubation were retrospectively examined. Demographic data, as well as clinical and surgical characteristics, were reviewed and the surgical technique was defined.

RESULTS

The mean BMI was 34.2 ± 7.12 kg/m2 (range 24.7-42.6). No conversion to laparotomy or laparoscopy was required. The median operative time was 39 (26.5-42) minutes. The median VAS scores at six and 12 h postoperatively were 3.5 (3-4) and 2 (1-2), respectively. There were no complications and all patients were discharged at the 12th postoperative hour.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the increased risk of surgical morbidity and mortality associated with increasing BMI and the difficulty in gaining access to the abdominal cavity not only in obese women but also in cases with previous extensive midline incisions, where dense intra-abdominal adhesions are likely, or in cases where esthetic considerations are important, vNOTES appears to be a useful alternative to assess tubal patency and adnexal anatomy and even to perform concomitant adnexal surgery.

Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) in Benign Gynaecology: A Systematic Review of Adnexal, Myomectomy and Prolapse Procedures

OBJECTIVE

Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is utilised for gynecological procedures globally, however evidence to support its application aside from hysterectomy is lacking. A systematic review to determine feasibility and safety profile of vNOTES for benign gynaecology was conducted.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL was conducted, including all types of studies reporting vNOTES for gynecological indications. After excluding cases with concurrent hysterectomy, the review focuses on procedures for benign indications and oncological procedures are reported separately. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were reported, with pooled analysis for sufficiently powered categories.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Fifty-four articles were analyzed, including 7 comparative studies (n = 439) and 1 RCT (n = 34), reporting 2469 cases of vNOTES, including adnexal (tubal and/or ovarian) (43 articles, n = 2261), myomectomy (10 articles, n = 136) and prolapse repair (6 articles, n = 72) in predominantly premenopausal women with BMI <30 kg/m2 on pooled analysis.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS

The overall conversion rate was low (1.38%, n = 34) with procedure specific conversion rates of 0.45 to 6.8% for adnexal procedures, 1.47% for myomectomy and none reported for prolapse repair. Overall complication rates were low (3.44%, n = 85) with no associated mortality. Five (0.20%) adhesion-related rectal injuries at colpotomy were noted, all repaired intraoperatively without long-term sequelae.

CONCLUSION

vNOTES appears feasible based on limited evidence, for uterine-sparing gynecological indications, despite a notable rate of rectal injury at colpotomy. There is a negligible risk of rectal injury observed at conventional laparoscopy and robotically assisted surgery, but similar rate of entry-related gastrointestinal injury. This may be due to the learning-curve or suboptimal case selection, necessitating careful training, assessment, and appropriate patient selection. Surgeons should continue registering prospective vNOTES cases via iNOTESs, to evaluate emerging perioperative trends with global uptake of this novel technique.

The feasibility and short-term safety of single-site hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study of a novel robotic platform

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic single-site hysterectomy is popular among patients and surgeons due to good cosmetic outcomes and fast recovery. However, questions remain such as loss of triangulation and instrument collision. Our aim is to test the feasibility and safety of a purpose-designed single-site robotic surgical platform mainly in hysterectomies.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected patients who had undergone hysterectomy by SHURUI (SR-ENS-600) robotic surgical system in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University. Initial cases as control were also collected including da Vinci single-site (IS4000) and multi-port (IS3000 and IS4000) hysterectomies performed by the same surgical team. The main outcome was surgical feasibility rate (valid surgeries/total cases × 100%). Short-term post-operative outcomes and complications were recorded and compared between three groups.

RESULTS

From Dec, 2nd, 2023 to Mar, 1st, 2024, 19 cases of hysterectomies were enrolled, including 6 myomas, 2 adenomyosis, 9 cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/stage Ia1 cancers, and 2 stage Ia endometrial cancers. Seventeen cases of da Vinci single-site surgeries and 20 cases of multi-ports surgeries were also included for comparation. Intra-operative bleeding volume was significantly lower in SHURUI group compared with da Vinci single-site and multi-ports groups (40.5 mL vs 47.4 mL vs 58.5 mL, P = 0.046 and 0.028). Post-operative time to flatus was also shorter in SHURUI group compared with da Vinci single-site and multi-port surgeries (22.9 h vs. 33.5 h vs. 28.6 h, P = 0.054 and 0.001). Follow-up for SHURUI group lasted for 3 months with no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

SHURUI robotic surgery was feasible and safe in hysterectomies. It also had comparable outcomes with da Vinci robotic platform and approaches.

Feasibility and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) panhysterectomy: a polycentric retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the feasibility and safety of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES) panhysterectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 75 patients who underwent panhysterectomy for hysteromyoma in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Tongxiang Maternal and Child Health Hospital; Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Changzhou Second People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC from June 2019 to June 2020. According to the operation mode, the patients were divided into two groups: the traditional multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) group (n = 45) and the Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES) group (n = 30). The operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exsufflation time, postoperative activity time, hospital stay, treatment cost, 6 h activities of daily living (ADL) score after the operation, cosmetic score, visual analog score, and complications were observed in the two groups.

RESULTS

Perioperative period related indicators: Compared with the MPLS group, the total treatment cost and cosmetic score of the V-NOTES group were significantly better than those of the MPLS group, but the operation duration was longer, and the HB decreased more significantly (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exsufflation time, postoperative activity time, 6 h ADL score after the operation, and hospital stay between the two groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative pain: The VAS score 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h after the operation was lower in the V-NOTES group than in the MPLS group (P < 0.05). Postoperative complications: The complication rate of the V-NOTES group was significantly lower than that of the MPLS group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In treating panhysterectomy patients, both V-NOTES and MPLS can achieve satisfactory efficacy and prognosis, and both have advantages and disadvantages. Specifically, the V-NOTES surgery has significant advantages such as a lower treatment cost, lower incidence of postoperative complications, less pain, and more beautiful wounds.

Perioperative outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in hysterectomy: A comparative study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic diseases using transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) or transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS).

METHODS

A total of 314 patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign uterine disease at West China Second University Hospital between October 2018 and December 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. vNOTES (n = 157) and TU-LESS (n = 157) recipients were matched 1:1 in terms of uterine volume. The operation time, blood loss, postoperative decrease in hemoglobin, uterus weight, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative pain score at 12 h, postoperative indwelling catheter time, and other clinical indicators were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

All 314 patients successfully completed the surgery, and the two groups had similar baseline characteristics, with no statistical difference. Regarding intraoperative outcomes, the operation time was shorter in the vNOTES group than in the TU-LESS group (80 vs 100 min, P = 0.04), and there were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion rate, postoperative decrease in hemoglobin, or uterine weight. Concerning postoperative outcomes, vNOTES hysterectomy was significantly superior to TU-LESS hysterectomy in terms of the length of hospital stay (3 vs 4 days, P < 0.001), visual analog scale score for pain at 12 h after surgery (P = 0.04), postoperative indwelling catheter time (39.5 vs 64.0 h, P < 0.001), and postoperative exhaust time (24.0 vs 42.0 h, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

vNOTES and TU-LESS seem safe and feasible for hysterectomy, but vNOTES hysterectomy was more conducive to the postoperative rehabilitation of patients, with less trauma, less pain, and better cosmetic effects than TU-LESS hysterectomy. As an emerging surgical approach, more studies, including large-sample, multicenter, randomized controlled trials, are needed to validate our findings.

Discharge within 24 h, transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery- more suitable for ambulatory surgery in gynecology procedures: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is an achievement in the field of minimally invasive surgery. However, the vantage point of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologicalprocedures remains unclear. The main purpose of this study was to compare vNOTES with laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery, and to determine which procedure is more suitable for ambulatory surgery in gynecologic procedures.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital. The 207 enrolled patients had accepted vNOTES and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology procedures from February 2021 to March 2022. Surgically relevant information regarding patients who underwent ambulatory surgery was collected, and 64 females underwent vNOTES.

RESULTS

Multiple outcomes were analyzed in 207 patients. The Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test showed that there were statistically significant differences between the vNOTES and laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery groups in terms of postoperative pain score (0 vs. 1 scores, p = 0.026), duration of anesthesia (90 vs. 101 min, p = 0.025), surgery time (65 vs. 80 min, p = 0.015), estimated blood loss (20 vs. 40 mL, p < 0.001), and intestinal exhaustion time (12.20 vs. 17.14 h, p < 0.001). Treatment with vNOTES resulted in convenience, both with respect to time savings and hemorrhage volume in surgery and with respect to the quality of the prognosis.

CONCLUSION

These comprehensive data reveal the capacity of vNOTES to increase surgical efficiency. vNOTES in gynecological procedures may demonstrate sufficient feasibility and provide a new medical strategy compared with laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery for ambulatory surgery in gynecological procedures.

Comparison of hysterectomy cases performed by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: A paired sample cross-sectional study

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility, indications, and benefits of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (v-NOTES) hysterectomy for nonmalignant gynecological diseases. The clinical data, including the baseline information and surgical conditions of 81 patients who underwent v-NOTES hysterectomy for nonmalignant gynecological diseases in a tertiary university hospital from October 2018 to August 2022, were retrospectively analyzed and compared with the total laparoscopic hysterectomy group (200 cases) and the transumbilical laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgery group (150 cases). In comparison with the other 2 groups, the highest proportion of patients in the v-NOTES group had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Accordingly, mean preoperative uterine volume measured by sonography was significantly smaller in the v-notes group. In the v-NOTES group, the mean number of vaginal deliveries and age were significantly higher, while the mean number of previous abdominal surgeries was lower compared to the other 2 groups. The V-NOTES group had a shorter operation time, shorter postoperative urinary catheter insertion time, earlier intestinal recovery days, shorter hospital stay, and lower visual analogue scale scores after surgery, and the differences were statistically significant. When indicated appropriately, v-NOTES hysterectomy can be a feasible and advantageous surgical modality. In particular, in comparison to the laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgery and total laparoscopic hysterectomy groups, the v-NOTES group had advantages in postoperative recovery and had more aesthetic surgical results.

Does transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery affect female sexual function?: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effect of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) on female sexual function.

METHODS

The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100050887, 07/09/2021). In this prospective cohort study, we prospectively analyzed the data of the female sexual function index (FSFI) questionnaire of 130 patients who underwent laparoscopy in Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital due to gynecological benign diseases. The patients were assigned to the vNOTES group and the control group (underwent traditional laparoscopic surgery or transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery).

RESULTS

There were 4 cases dropout in the vNOTES group and 2 cases dropout in the control group. There was no difference in the ages (31.70 ± 5.02 vs. 30.37 ± 5.74, P>0.05), BMI (body mass index, 21.76 ± 3.16 vs. 23.30 ± 2.69, P>0.05), Education level, surgical types, and FSFI scores (22.31 ± 2.25 vs. 21.55 ± 3.38) between the vNOTES group and the control group before surgery. There was no difference in FSFI scores six months postoperation between the vNOTES group and the control group (21.61 ± 3.22 vs. 20.99 ± 3.26, P>0.05), and there was no difference in FSFI scores pre- and six months postoperation in vNOTES group (21.61 ± 3.22 vs. 22.31 ± 2.25, P>0.05). The time to start sexual life after surgery in the vNOTES group was later than that in the control group (39.34 ± 0.71 d versus 37.86 ± 0.69 d, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

vNOTES has no significant adverse effect on female sexual function, however, the time to start sexual life after vNOTES is later than that after trans-abdominal laparoscopy.

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus conventional vaginal surgery for sacrospinous ligament fixation of apical compartment prolapse: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

To objectively assess the safety, feasibility, advantages, and disadvantages of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) versus conventional vaginal (CV) surgery for sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent hysterectomy for SSLF via vNOTES or CV surgery due to apical compartment prolapse between April 2019 and April 2020 at our hospital. The patients were classified into the vNOTES group (n = 31) and CV surgery group (n = 51) based on surgical approach and their general characteristics and perioperative outcomes compared.

RESULTS

The two groups had similar general characteristics. The anatomical success and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy rates were higher in the vNOTES than CV surgery group, while the postoperative stay was shorter in the vNOTES than CV surgery group. All differences were statistically significant. However, there were no statistically significant intergroup differences in operation time, bilateral salpingectomy rate, colporrhaphy rate, postoperative visual analog scale score, estimated blood loss, hemoglobin decrease at 72 h postoperative, maximum body temperature at 72 h postoperative, complication rate, buttock pain, or Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire-20 scores at 1 year postoperative.

CONCLUSIONS

VNOTES for SSLF was safe and feasible and resulted in superior objective and subjective outcomes versus CV surgery for SSLF. These findings suggest that vNOTES could be an alternative to CV surgery for SSLF.

V-NOTES hysterectomy under spinal anaesthesia: A pilot study

Background: Spinal anaesthesia has not been widely adopted for laparoscopic surgeries until now. There are a few studies that have shown that spinal anaesthesia is at least as safe as general anaesthesia. The need for additional analgesics can be reduced by utilising early postoperative analgesic effects of spinal anaesthesia, and maximum benefit can be obtained from minimally invasive approaches when V-NOTES surgery is performed under spinal anaesthesia. Objective: Combining V-NOTES with spinal anaesthesia to improve minimally invasive surgical techniques and provide maximum benefit to patients. Materials and methods: Patients who were found to have benign pelvic organ pathologies, required a hysterectomy and were considered suitable for V-NOTES hysterectomy under spinal anaesthesia were included in this study. Spinal anaesthesia was achieved with 12.5 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in the sitting position. Perioperative events and complications related to spinal anaesthesia were noted. Postoperatively, the pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale at the 6th, 12th, and 24th hours. Main outcome measures: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of spinal anaesthesia in VNOTES hysterectomy and to increase the advantages of minimally invasive surgical procedures. Results: No conversion to conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy was required in all six operated patients. Conversion from spinal anaesthesia to general anaesthesia was unnecessary, and no major perioperative incident occurred in any of the cases. Conclusion: In the current study by our team, we demonstrated that V-NOTES hysterectomy could be performed safely under spinal anaesthesia in well-selected patients. The need for additional analgesics can be reduced by utilising early postoperative analgesic effects of spinal anaesthesia, and maximum benefit can be obtained from minimally invasive approaches when VNOTES surgery is performed under spinal anaesthesia. What is new? V-NOTES hysterectomy could be performed safely under spinal anaesthesia in well-selected patients.

A New and Alternative Route: Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Scarless Surgery (vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery) For Class 2 and Class 3 Obese Patients Suffering From Benign and Malignant Gynecologic Pathologies

Background. This study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) gynecologic scarless surgery in benign and malignant class 2 and class 3 obese patients. Materials and methods. The class 2 and class 3 obese women undergoing vNOTES scarless surgery for benign and malign indications at a tertiary referral medical center between January 2019 and April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and surgical outcomes were measured. Results. In this study, 81 class 2 and class 3 obese patients underwent gynecological procedures using vNOTES scarless surgery. Of the 81 operations, 55 of the class 2 obese patients with benign pathologies, and 26 of the class 3 obese patients had malign pathologies. No conversion to conventional laparoscopy or even laparotomy was needed in any of the procedures. All of the surgeries were performed by the same surgeon (Prof. Dr Ahmet Kale). vNOTES scarless surgery was performed on 26 class 3 obese patients with malign pathologies. Of the 26 class 3 obese patients, 22 of the class 3 obese patients with early-stage endometrial carcinoma had very high mean body mass index 41.5 kg/m2 (range 20.6-56) and 4 of the class 3 obese patients had ascites with unknown cause and diagnosed with peritoneal carcinomatosis. The mean postoperative pain VAS scores of class 2 obese patients undergoing vNOTES scarless surgery with benign pathology at 6, 12, and 24 h were 3.19, 1.11, and .66, respectively, and the mean postoperative pain VAS scores of class 3 obese patients underwent vNOTES scarless surgery with malign pathology at 6, 12, and 24 h were 3.30, 1.76, and 1.03, respectively. Conclusion. vNOTES scarless surgery is an alternative surgical method for diagnosis and treatment not only in benign obese cases, but also in severely obese patients with early stage endometrial cancer and patients had with ascites with unknown cause. In the near future, vNOTES scarless surgery will become more preferable by experienced surgeons in benign and malignant obese cases as it has increased satisfaction with esthetic results such as less pain, and improved postoperative quality of life in the short and long term.

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic versus conventional vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension for apical compartment prolapse

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare surgical and short-term postoperative outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) versus conventional vaginal (CV) uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 135 patients who underwent hysterectomy with USLS via CV (n = 70) or via vNOTES (n = 65). Patients' baseline characteristics, surgical characteristics, and surgical outcomes were retrieved. The primary outcome was total operative time. Secondary outcomes include intra- and post-operative complications.

RESULTS

Salpingectomy was performed in all vNOTES procedures and in only 27 % of conventional vaginal procedures (p < 0.005). Compared to the conventional vaginal procedures (n = 65), the vNOTES (n = 70) showed lower mean operative time and mean anesthesia time (101.4 ± 22.3 vs 125.5 ± 27.6 min and 141.4 ± 29.6 vs. 174.0 ± 32.9 min, respectively); and slightly longer median hospital stay (3 [range 2-4] vs. 2 [range 2-4] days, p < 0.05). Compared to women who underwent conventional vaginal hysterectomy with USLS, women who underwent vNOTES hysterectomy with USLS had lower incidences of intraoperative complications (6% vs. 18 %, p < 0.05) and intraoperative ureteral obstruction (0% vs. 8%, p < 0.05); and less estimated blood loss (58 ± 68 ml vs. 143 ± 87 ml, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

vNOTES hysterectomy with USLS is associated with reduced incidence of intraoperative complications, shorter surgical and anesthesia time, and slightly longer hospital stay, compared to the traditional vaginal surgical approach. Post-operative complications during hospital stay were similar and infrequent following the two procedures.

vNOTES for adnexal procedures

This work aims to describe the technique and review all transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for adnexal procedures performed and to acknowledge vNOTES as an alternative to conventional laparoscopy. The procedure consisted of an incision in the Pouch of Douglas, insertion of a single port device, laparoscopic surgery through the device, extraction of specimens through the vagina and closure of the vaginal apex with a direct suture. Eighteen procedures have been successfully completed, 1 patient required conversion to conventional abdominal surgery due to intolerance to pneumoperitoneum. Surgeries' length range was 45-210 minutes. The estimated blood loss was less than 100 mL. The patients required minimal analgesia, were discharged the day after and had no postoperative complications. No patients complained of dyspareunia. Two patients conceived after surgery. vNOTES is a safe and desirable approach to the adnexa and a reasonable alternative to conventional laparoscopy or vaginal surgery.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Natural Orifice Transluminal Surgery (NOTES) is a technique used to access the abdominal cavity through natural orifice. Compared to conventional laparoscopy, it's expected to have fewer complications.What do the results of this study add? This is one of the few works addressing vNOTES adnexal surgery, which appears to be a good alternative to conventional laparoscopy.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? vNOTES may be a desirable approach to the adnexa. This work opens a door to new research regarding vNOTES in more complex gynaecologic procedures.

Hysterectomy and Adnexal Procedures by Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (VNH): Initial Findings From a Korean Surgeon

Objective: To evaluate feasibility and safety of hysterectomy and adnexal procedures by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES).

Study Design: This is a prospective observational study at a tertiary center and teaching University hospital. We enrolled prospectively 34 patients with benign diseases sequentially.

Results: We measured baseline characteristics, surgical data, and pain score (VAS) after surgery. We surveyed before/after surgery. The time of port installation and each stage of surgery was measured. The learning curve was assessed through the graph according to the number of operations using linear and logarithmic regression curve estimation. The complications of surgery were investigated. The median age of the patients was 47.5 years (38–73). Median BMI was 22.4 (18.2–30.0). 20 cases of leiomyoma, four cases of adenomyosis, three cases of uterine prolapse, four cases of endometrial hyperplasia, and three cases of CIN were diagnosed. The median uterine weight was 180.0 g. The median port-installation time was 15.0 min (range, 4–35 min) and median total operation time was 85.5 min (range 43.0–132.0). Complications occurred in three patients. Two cases of bladder injury happened during vesicovaginal space dissection before the installation of the Wound Retractor (WR). One patient underwent transumbilical single-port surgery because of late-onset postoperative bleeding on the 13th postoperative day. The mean postoperative VAS scores were 3.36 immediately after surgery and 3.06, 2.79, and 2.45 at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery, respectively. In continuous variable analysis, we detected a correlation between port-installation time and postoperative VAS ≥4 (pain score as need for medication). Based on a learning curve, port-installation time and total operation time appeared to reach the proficiency level by the 10th case.

Conclusions: Although there were three complications, vNOTES offers advantages to patients and surgeons. More surgical techniques will be developed in vNOTES.

Comparative analysis of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in ovarian cystectomy

AIM

To objectively assess the safety, feasibility, advantages and disadvantages and health economics benefits of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) versus transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) in ovarian cystectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of all patients in our hospital who had undergone vNOTES and TU-LESS ovarian cystectomy due to 'unilateral ovarian cyst' from March 2019 to May 2020. Patients were classified into vNOTES group (86) and TU-LESS group (210) based on surgical paths. The patients' general characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

All 296 patients completed surgery with no need to switch to conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy procedures. There were no complications of Grade III, IV, V in Clavien-Dindo classification. There were two patients in the vNOTES group and four patients in the TU-LESS group with complications of Grade I, all of whom were treated with antipyretic drugs for postoperative fever. One patient in the TU-LESS group presented the complication of Grade II and was treated with blood transfusion due to postoperative anemia. The two groups had similar general characteristics. Perioperative outcomes: The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores 24 h postoperation were significantly lower in the vNOTES group than in the TU-LESS group. The cosmetic scores were significantly higher in the vNOTES group than in the TU-LESS group. Postoperative stay and time of flatus after surgery were significantly shorter in the vNOTES group than in the TU-LESS group. There was not significant statistical differences between the two groups in operation time, estimated blood loss, Hb decrease at 48 h postoperation, maximum body temperature in 48 h after surgery and hospital costs.

CONCLUSION

It was proved to be safe and feasible in ovarian cystectomy by vNOTES. It worked better than TU-LESS in relieving postoperative pain, shortening postoperative stay and improving cosmetic effects and so on. As an emerging surgical path, large sample multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to further verify its safety and advantages.

Alternative method for the diagnosis of acid cases of unknown cause: Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and reliability of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) technique in making the diagnosis of ascites with unknown cause.

METHODS

Seven patients with ascites with unknown cause and diagnosed with vNOTES between November 2018 and May 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The following data were collected retrospectively: body mass index, age, parity, previous abdominal or pelvic surgery, total operating time, perioperative complications and visual analog scale scores for evaluation of postoperative pain. After general anesthesia and disinfection, a 2-3 cm incision was made in the posterior fornix of the vagina. In all of the vNOTES procedures, a handmade glove port system comprised of a glove-wound retractor NOTES port was used.

RESULTS

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for diagnostic peritoneoscopy was successfully performed in seven patients. Following postoperative pathological examination; three patients were established to have peritoneal carcinomatosis, one patient abdominal tuberculous, one patient ovarian fibroma, one patient ovarian mature cystic teratoma and one patient stomach cancer. In 1-year follow-up period after vNOTES procedure, no adverse events occurred in patients.

CONCLUSION

In making histological diagnosis of ascites with unknown cause, vNOTES is a feasible, safe and efficient technique. Due to its high performance in diagnosis, this technique helps to initiate treatment early in some diseases in addition to preventing unnecessary treatment and examination in benign diseases. Besides, via obtaining a detailed and enlarged image of abdominal cavity, this procedure also guides the clinician in the evaluation of the suitability of patient for operation.

A Simple Gasless Direct Suturing Technique to Achieve Ovarian Hemostasis During Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Ovarian Cystectomy

Background: Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) was introduced in 2012, but the technique is not yet widely used for ovarian cystectomy. We aim to introduce a new gasless ovarian hemostatic suturing technique for ovarian cystectomy using vNOTES. Methods: We conducted a prospective study using a novel technique for vNOTES ovarian cystectomy. Our vNOTES port (a wound retractor and a disposable glove) was inserted transvaginally through a posterior colpotomy. After ovarian cystectomy, removal of the glove created a gasless state. Hemostatic suturing of the ovary was performed through a vaginal speculum inserted through the wound retractor, under direct observation. Results: Twenty ovarian cystectomies were performed through vNOTES at our institution between June 2019 and February 2020. The mean patient age was 34.2 years (range, 24-51 years). Four patients (20%) underwent bilateral cystectomy and 16 patients (80%) underwent unilateral cystectomy. The mean operative time was 58.7 minutes (bilateral, 57.5 minutes; unilateral, 58.9 minutes), and the mean ovarian hemostatic suturing time was 4.3 minutes (bilateral, 5 minutes; unilateral, 4.1 minutes). Ten patients (50%) received additional medication for pain control within 30 minutes of surgery. All patients were discharged within 24 hours, and 11 were discharged within 12 hours. Conclusion: The gasless hemostatic suturing technique for vNOTES, using a speculum to observe the suturing process, is easy to perform and allows for rapid ovarian hemostasis.

Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for extremely obese patients with early-stage endometrial cancer

AIM

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (v-NOTES) staging surgery for extreme obese patients with early-stage type-1 endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Study included cases of extreme obese patients with early-stage endometrial cancer who underwent v-NOTES between January 2019 and June 2019 at a tertiary referral medical center. The following parameters were noted: patient age, body mass index (BMI), operating time, conversion to conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy, any intraoperative or postoperative complications, estimated blood loss, pre- and postoperative hemoglobin levels, postoperative pain scores of the patients using visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6th, 12th and 24th h, length of hospital stay and final pathology report.

RESULTS

Six cases of extreme obese patients with early-stage endometrial cancer underwent hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy via the transvaginal NOTES. These six patients had a mean body mass index of 51.4 kg/m² (SD = 6,13). No conversion to conventional laparoscopy or even laparotomy was needed in any of these patients. No adjuvant therapy was needed since all of the patients had early-stage endometrial carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Given the increased risk of surgical morbidity and mortality associated with increasing BMI, it is paramount importance to establish safe surgical approaches to gynecological pathologies. We think that v-NOTES offers greater benefit to obese patients when performed by an experienced surgeon and v-NOTES is a safe, effective and feasible minimally invasive surgery in extreme obese patients with early endometrial cancer.

Application of the prone position in myomectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery

Introduction

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a new concept of minimally invasive surgery. It could prevent complications related to the trocar in laparoscopic surgery, and help achieve ideal cosmetic outcomes.

Aim

To describe the safety and feasibility of the prone position in transvaginal NOTES (V-NOTES) resection of posterior uterine myoma.

Material and methods

Seventeen patients were included in the study from February to December 2019. All the patients were diagnosed with solitary posterior uterine myoma and underwent V-NOTES myomectomy in the prone position. We measured the characteristics and the surgical outcomes of these patients, to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the prone position in V-NOTES myomectomy.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 38.71 ±7.68 years and the mean body mass index was 22 ±2.02 kg/m². Five patients had a cesarean section once, and 1 patient had a history of two operations (cesarean section and laparoscopic cholecystectomy). The remaining patients had no history of surgery. The mean myoma volume in the ultrasound report was 121.99 ±125.24 cm³. The mean operation time was 107.48 ±34.16 min. The mean hemoglobin decrease 48 h after the operation was 1.37 ±0.66 g/dl. The mean weight of the myoma was 183.88 ±144.29 g. The mean VAS score 12 h and 24 h after surgery was 2 ±0.87 and 1.18 ±0.73, respectively. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.18 ±0.39 days. One patient was converted to TU-LESS. No other complications such as massive hemorrhage, infection or injury occurred.

Conclusions

The prone position in V-NOTES myomectomy is safe and feasible. It expands the operative space and reduces the difficulty of surgery. Perhaps it can be used as a standard position for posterior uterine myomectomy by V-NOTES.

Learning curve analysis of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy

Background

No data are available to assess the learning curve for transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy for non-prolapsed uteri in benign gynecologic diseases. The lack of exposure to transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy during training, in addition to a poorly defined learning curve, further deters interested physicians from applying this technique to daily practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve and perioperative outcome of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy by an experienced endoscopist.

Methods

A total of 240 cases of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomies with or without adnexectomy for various benign gynecologic diseases were included. Demographic data and various perioperative parameters were reviewed from the prospectively collected database. Operative time was set as a surrogate marker for surgical competency. The learning curve was evaluated using the cumulative sum method.

Results

The overall mean operative time (OT) was 76.5 min ± 22.4. Four unique phases of the learning curve were derived using cumulative sum analysis: the mean OT of phase I (the initial learning curve of 20 cases) was 86.3 ± 23.7 min, phase II (acquisition of competence of 80 cases) was 71.0 ± 21.4 min, phase III (proficiency and plateau of 80 cases) was 76.0 ± 20.4 min, and phase IV (post-learning in which more challenging cases were managed) was 81.3 ± 23.6 min. No major complications were encountered. One case in phase III converted to laparoscopy due to difficulty in performing anterior colpotomy.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrated four distinct phases of the learning curve of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy. In a well-trained endoscopist, surgical competence in transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy can be reached after 20 cases.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12893-019-0554-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) assisted by an umbilical camera: Case report and new hybrid technique in gynecology

•

Hybrid-Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) makes us to perform NOTES more safer with the direct visualization of the abdominal cavity.

•

Hybrid NOTES can lesser the exclusion criterias for NOTES.

•

Hybrid NOTES can lesser the complications; by capability of seeing all the major structures such as ureters, uterine vessels, bowels and pelvic adhesions.

Introduction

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a new development in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this study was to demonstrate a new hybrid NOTES technique in gynecology which can be used for hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in patients with adnexal pathology and multiple operation histories.

Presentation of case

A 50-year-old woman with gravida 2 para 2 was referred to our clinic with left-sided abdominal pain. She had a history of two previous abdominal surgeries and a persistent ovarian cyst for 2 years. An ultrasound examination revealed a left complex hypoechoic ovarian cyst of 10 cm. Tumor markers were normal and the patient had no suspicion for malignancy. The hybrid NOTES technique assisted by an umbilical camera was planned due to the possibility of pelvic adhesions and her concerns about cosmesis.

Discussion

The major difference between NOTES and umbilical camera assisted NOTES is seeing all of the major structures, such as the ureters, uterine vessels, bowels, and pelvic adhesions, which can lead to complications during the surgery. In fact, hybrid NOTES can make surgeries more feasible.

Conclusion

This new hybrid NOTES offers effective and safer surgical management in patients who have had previous surgery and adnexal masses.