1
|
Tong Y, Gu Q, Dong B, Ying H, Ji T, Shen X, Shen B, Yu H, Feng L, Cai X, Li Z. Beta-catenin/sirtuin 1/farnesoid X receptor pathway promotion of portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced rapid liver regeneration. Surgery 2025; 182:109343. [PMID: 40157124 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2025] [Revised: 02/25/2025] [Accepted: 03/02/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND By accelerating the regeneration of the future liver remnant, portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection allows for more extensive hepatectomy. Given that the mechanism remains poorly understood, the aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism of portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration. METHODS A portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration mouse model was established, followed by RNA microarray analysis to identify candidate molecules. Genomic deletion and chemical manipulation of target molecules were used to explore their functions in portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration. Validation was conducted using a diseased liver model and human samples. RESULTS Portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration was significantly accelerated compared with that in sham-operated mice (P < .05). An RNA microarray revealed that Sirtuin 1 is a crucial molecule in the proliferation of the future liver remnant. Regardless of whether Sirtuin 1 is inhibited chemically or through genetic deletion, portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration is distinctly attenuated. Further investigation revealed that Sirtuin 1 promoted portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration via the farnesoid X receptor. In addition, beta-catenin also was found to participate in the process of future liver remnant proliferation. Chemical inhibition of beta-catenin markedly impaired but activation of WNT/beta-catenin mildly enhanced portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration (P < .05). Deletion of Sirtuin 1 blocked the facilitating effect of beta-catenin on portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration. These findings were validated in diseased liver models and patient samples, confirming the correlation between the beta-catenin/Sirtuin 1/farnesoid X receptor pathway and portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration. CONCLUSION Activation of the beta-catenin/Sirtuin 1/farnesoid X receptor pathway offers critical mechanistic insights into accelerating portal vein ligation and parenchymal transection-induced liver regeneration. Modulation of beta-catenin/Sirtuin 1/farnesoid X receptor may therefore improve clinical outcomes in patients receiving staged hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Tong
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Provincial Key Laboratory of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Infection, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qiuxia Gu
- Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of Pathology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Bingzhi Dong
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Provincial Key Laboratory of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Infection, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hanning Ying
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Tong Ji
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiaoyun Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Bo Shen
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Provincial Key Laboratory of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Infection, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hong Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Provincial Key Laboratory of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Infection, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lifeng Feng
- Department of Biomedical Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiujun Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zheyong Li
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Liver Regeneration and Metabolism Study Group, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of General Surgery, Alaer Hospital, School of Medicine, Tarim University, Alar, Xinjiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li AY, Ahmad MU, Sofilos MC, Lee RM, Maithel SK, Lee TC, Chadalavada S, Shah SA, Acher AW, Abbott DE, Wong P, Kessler J, Melstrom LG, Kirks R, Rocha FG, Delitto DJ, Lee B, Visser BC, Poultsides GA. Postoperative hepatic insufficiency despite preoperative portal vein embolization: Not just about the volumetrics. Surgery 2025; 182:109345. [PMID: 40157125 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2025] [Accepted: 03/02/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Future liver remnant hypertrophy is the primary endpoint of portal vein embolization before major hepatectomy. However, even when adequate future liver remnant is achieved, postoperative hepatic insufficiency is not universally averted. We aimed to identify preoperative risk factors of postoperative hepatic insufficiency despite the use of portal vein embolization. METHODS Patients who underwent portal vein embolization followed by major hepatectomy at 6 academic medical centers were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative hepatic insufficiency was defined as postoperative peak bilirubin >7 mg/dL. Preoperative variables associated with postoperative hepatic insufficiency were analyzed. RESULTS From 2008 to 2019, 164 patients underwent portal vein embolization followed by major hepatectomy. Twenty (12%) patients developed postoperative hepatic insufficiency. On univariate analysis, postoperative hepatic insufficiency was associated with older age, performance status, preoperative biliary drainage, smaller pre- and post-portal vein embolization future liver remnant volumes, diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma/gallbladder cancer, and preoperative cholangitis. There was significant future liver remnant hypertrophy noted even in the setting of postoperative hepatic insufficiency (from 27% to 39%); however, degree of hypertrophy >5% (100% vs 93%, P = .6) and kinetic growth rate >2%/week (95% vs 82%, P = .3) did not differ between the postoperative hepatic insufficiency and non-postoperative hepatic insufficiency groups. On multivariate analysis, the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma/gallbladder cancer and preoperative cholangitis (postoperative hepatic insufficiency incidence 34% and 62%, respectively), but not future liver remnant volumetrics, were independently associated with postoperative hepatic insufficiency. Postoperative hepatic insufficiency raised post-hepatectomy 90-day mortality from 3.5% to 45% and hospitalization from 7 days to 16 days (both P < .001). CONCLUSION Postoperative hepatic insufficiency still occurs in 12% of patients after major hepatectomy despite preoperative portal vein embolization. In addition to traditional volumetric information, surgeons should be aware of preoperative cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma/gallbladder cancer as powerful predictors of this fatal complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Y Li
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - M Usman Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Marc C Sofilos
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Rachel M Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Tiffany C Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Seetharam Chadalavada
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Shimul A Shah
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Alexandra W Acher
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Paul Wong
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Jonathan Kessler
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Laleh G Melstrom
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Russell Kirks
- Department of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Flavio G Rocha
- Department of General, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Daniel J Delitto
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Byrne Lee
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Brendan C Visser
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - George A Poultsides
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fujisawa M, Yoshioka R, Takahashi A, Irie S, Takeda Y, Ichida H, Imamura H, Kotera Y, Mise Y, Saiura A. Central hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: an alternative technique for parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy to prevent post-hepatectomy liver failure. HPB (Oxford) 2025; 27:599-606. [PMID: 39965983 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2025.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2024] [Revised: 10/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/05/2025] [Indexed: 02/20/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) often requires major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection, carrying the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Central hepatectomy (CH), an alternative technique, aims to preserve functional liver reserve. This study evaluated the feasibility of CH and outcomes for patients with PHC within the paradigm of parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy. METHODS A retrospective analysis included PHC patients who underwent CH between March 2019 and January 2023. Preoperative evaluations involved multimodality imaging and assessment of future remnant liver volume. RESULTS Fourteen patients underwent CH for PHC. Tumor locations were perihilar bile duct (10 patients), and entire extrahepatic bile duct involvement (four patients). Median operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 679.5 min and 450 mL, respectively. Clinically-relevant PHLF occurred in two patients, with one sepsis-related death. Nine patients achieved R0 resection. Functional liver reserve parameters exceeded the standard procedure (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION CH for PHC preserves functional liver reserve, potentially reducing PHLF risk. Adequate preoperative evaluation is crucial, and oncological outcomes require further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Fujisawa
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryuji Yoshioka
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Takahashi
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoichi Irie
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Takeda
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Ichida
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Imamura
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Kotera
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Mise
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akio Saiura
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu JJ, Zhou M, Yuan T, Huang ZY, Zhang ZY. Conversion treatment for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Opportunities and challenges. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31:104901. [PMID: 40309227 PMCID: PMC12038554 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i15.104901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2025] [Revised: 02/22/2025] [Accepted: 03/26/2025] [Indexed: 04/18/2025] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is increasing globally. Despite advancements in comprehending this intricate malignancy and formulating novel therapeutic approaches over the past few decades, the prognosis for ICC remains poor. Owing to the high degree of malignancy and insidious onset of ICC, numerous cases are detected at intermediate or advanced stages of the disease, hence eliminating the chance for surgical intervention. Moreover, because of the highly invasive characteristics of ICC, recurrence and metastasis postresection are prevalent, leading to a 5-year survival rate of only 20%-35% following surgery. In the past decade, different methods of treatment have been investigated, including transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and combination therapies. For certain patients with advanced ICC, conversion treatment may be utilized to facilitate surgical resection and manage disease progression. This review summarizes the definition of downstaging conversion treatment and presents the clinical experience and evidence concerning conversion treatment for advanced ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun-Jie Liu
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China
| | - Mi Zhou
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China
| | - Tong Yuan
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China
| | - Zhi-Yong Huang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China
| | - Zun-Yi Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang W, Qin Z, Wang JL, Zhang L, Xu BH, Zhu H, Guo Y, Wen Z. Spleen volume after stage-I associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy predicts future liver remnant. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2025; 410:128. [PMID: 40232515 PMCID: PMC12000165 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-025-03698-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2025] [Indexed: 04/16/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The spleen has been reported to inhibit liver regeneration following hepatectomy; however, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In particular, its role in future liver remnant (FLR) regeneration after associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) warrants investigation. AIM To evaluate the relationship between splenic volume changes and FLR regeneration following ALPPS-stage I in patients with massive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Clinical data from 65 HCC patients who underwent ALPPS between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Liver and spleen volumes were measured pre- and post-ALPPS-stage I use the IQQA-Liver system. The kinetic growth rate (KGR) of the FLR was calculated. Pearson correlation and logistic regression were used to identify predictors of FLR hypertrophy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine cutoff values for splenic predictors. RESULTS Following ALPPS-stage I, FLR volume significantly increased from 35.57%±8.51-54.31%±11.19% of standard liver volume (SLV) (P < 0.001), with a median KGR of 4.65%/day. Splenic volume also increased (218.65 ± 84.77 cm³ vs. 252.69 cm³, P < 0.001). Preoperative splenic volume and spleen volume/SLV ratio negatively correlated with KGR (r = -0.240, P = 0.027; r = -0.218, P = 0.041). Multivariate analysis identified splenic volume (OR = 0.991, P = 0.043), platelet count (OR = 1.014, P = 0.013), Indocyanine Green Retention Rate at 15 min (ICG-R15) (OR = 0.670, P = 0.010), and CNLC stage (P = 0.001) as independent predictors of FLR regeneration. ROC analysis showed that splenic volume > 265.29 cm³ (AUC = 0.645) and spleen volume/SLV ratio > 0.1997 (AUC = 0.646) predicted poor FLR hypertrophy. One- and two-year survival rates were 80.77% and 68.18%, respectively. CONCLUSION Preoperative splenic volume is an independent predictor of FLR regeneration after ALPPS. Combined evaluation of splenic volume, platelet count, and liver function may improve patient selection, reduce the risk of postoperative liver failure, and optimize surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No. 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
| | - Zhi Qin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No. 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
| | - Ji-Long Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No. 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
| | - Ling Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
| | - Bang-Hao Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No. 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
| | - Hai Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No. 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
| | - Ya Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No. 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China
| | - Zhang Wen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No. 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China.
- Guangxi Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hinojosa Arco LC, Roldán de la Rua JF, Gómez Pérez R, Suárez Muñoz MÁ. Response to: laparoscopic hybrid mini-ALPPS using transmesenteric intra-operative portal embolization for locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cir Esp 2024; 102:465-466. [PMID: 38851319 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rocío Gómez Pérez
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestiva, Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Magistri P, Guidetti C, Catellani B, Caracciolo D, Odorizzi R, Frassoni S, Bagnardi V, Guerrini GP, Di Sandro S, Di Benedetto F. Robotic ALPPS for primary and metastatic liver tumours: short-term outcomes versus open approach. Updates Surg 2024; 76:435-445. [PMID: 38326663 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01680-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is one of the strategies available for patients initially unresectable. High risk of peri-operative morbidity and mortality limited its application and diffusion. We aimed to analyse short-term outcomes of robotic ALPPS versus open approach, to assess safety and reproducibility of this technique. A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained databases at University of Modena and Reggio Emilia on patients that underwent ALPPS between January 2015 and September 2022 was conducted. The main aim of the study was to evaluate safety and feasibility of robotic approach, either full robotic or only first-stage robotic, compared to a control group of patients who underwent open ALPPS in the same Institution. 23 patients were included. Nine patients received a full open ALPPS (O-ALPPS), 7 received a full robotic ALPPS (R-ALPPS), and 7 underwent a robotic approach for stage 1, followed by an open approach for stage 2 (R + O-ALPPS). PHLF grade B-C after stage 1 was 0% in all groups, rising to 58% in the R + O-ALPPS group after stage 2 and remaining 0% in the R-ALPPS group. 86% of R-ALPPS cases were discharged from the hospital between stages 1 and 2, and median total in-hospital stay and ICU stay favoured full robotic approach as well. This contemporary study represents the largest series of robotic ALPPS, showing potential advantages from full robotic ALPPS over open approach, resulting in reduced hospital stay and complications and lower incidence of 90-day mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Cristiano Guidetti
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Barbara Catellani
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Daniela Caracciolo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberta Odorizzi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Gian Piero Guerrini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moga DFC, Gavrilă GA, Dan AA, Smarandache CG. Complete regression of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after right portal vein ligation. Case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2024; 117:109580. [PMID: 38547696 PMCID: PMC11010678 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spontaneous tumor regression is an extremely rare phenomenon in the oncology field. PRESENTATION OF CASE We present the case of a 72-years-old male patient presenting with a bulky hepatic tumor mass located in segment V and extending into segments IVb and VI with MRI features of atypical cholangiocarcinoma with a liver metastasis in segment III. In first surgical step, excision of the metastasis, and ligation of the right portal vein was done. A new MRI examination performed 5 weeks later shows significant tumor regression, and 2 weeks later, during the second surgery, the tumor was not found. Under these conditions we performed a limited segment V liver resection, in the area indicated by the radiologist as the site of the tumor. No viable malignant cells existed in the tumor specimen, and a third MRI examination didn't identify any residual tumor. DISCUSSION From our literature study this is the only case of complete tumor regression of an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following portal vein ligation. We believe the portal vein ligation resulted in a marked regression/deficiency in the tumor blood supply. CONCLUSION Serial MRI examinations demonstrated the regression of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after portal vein ligation. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma should be included in the tumors that could extremely rarely spontaneously regress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doru-Florian-Cornel Moga
- Clinical Department of Surgery, Military Clinical Emergency Hospital Sibiu and Lucian Blaga University Sibiu, Romania.
| | - Gabriela-Ariadna Gavrilă
- Medical Analysis Laboratory, Military Clinical Emergency Hospital Sibiu and Lucian Blaga University Sibiu, Romania
| | - Andreea-Alina Dan
- Department of Radiology, Military Clinical Emergency Hospital Sibiu, Romania
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fard-Aghaie MH, Stern L, Ghadban T, Apostolova I, Lehnert W, Klutmann S, Hackert T, Izbicki JR, Li J, von Kroge PH, Heumann A. Decreased mebrofenin uptake in patients with non-colorectal liver tumors requiring liver volume augmentation-a single-center analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:92. [PMID: 38467934 PMCID: PMC10927876 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03280-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains a life-threatening complication after hepatectomy. To reduce PHLF, a preoperative assessment of liver function is indispensable. For this purpose, 99mTc-mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy with SPECT (MSPECT) can be used. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the predictive value of MSPECT for PHLF in patients with non-colorectal liver tumors (NCRLT) compared to patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) undergoing extended liver resection. METHODS We included all patients undergoing extended liver resections via two-stage procedures between January 2019 and December 2021 at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. All patients received a preoperative MSPECT. RESULTS Twenty patients were included. In every fourth patient, PHLF was observed. Four patients had PHLF grade C. There were no differences between patients with CRLM and NCRLT regarding PHLF rate and future liver remnant (FLR) volume. Patients with CRLM had higher mebrofenin uptake in the FLR compared to those with NCRLT (2.49%/min/m2 vs. 1.51%/min/m2; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION Mebrofenin uptake in patients with NCRLT was lower compared to those patients with CRLM. However, there was no difference in the PHLF rate and FLR volume. Cut-off values for the mebrofenin uptake might need adjustments for different surgical indications, surgical procedures, and underlying diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M H Fard-Aghaie
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - L Stern
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - T Ghadban
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - I Apostolova
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - W Lehnert
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - S Klutmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - T Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - J R Izbicki
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - J Li
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - P H von Kroge
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Heumann
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Khatkov IE, Alikhanov RB, Bedin VV, Breder VV, Britskaya NN, Voskanyan SE, Vishnevsky VA, Granov DA, Zhukova LG, Zagainov VE, Kovalenko DE, Koroleva AA, Kulezneva YV, Melekhina OV, Nazarenko AV, Odintsova MV, Petrov LO, Pogrebnyakov IV, Podluzhny DV, Polyakov AN, Porshennikov IA, Rutkin IO, Semenov NN, Sudakov MA, Tarakanov PV, Feoktistova PS, Tsvirkun VV, Zhao AV, Shabunin AV, Efanov MG. [The Russian consensus on the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2024:7-20. [PMID: 39422002 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia20241017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2024]
Abstract
The Russian consensus on the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was prepared by the group of experts consisting of surgeons, interventional radiologists, radiation therapists and oncologists. The purposes of this consensus are clarification and consolidation of opinions of multidisciplinary team on the following issues of management of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: indications for surgical treatment, features of therapeutic tactics for mechanical jaundice, technical aspects of liver resection, prevention of post-resection liver failure, indications for liver resection using transplantation technologies, laparoscopic and robot-assisted liver resection, perioperative systemic chemotherapy, local non-resection/non-radiotherapy methods of treatment, radiotherapy, follow-up and choice of treatment for recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I E Khatkov
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - R B Alikhanov
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - V V Bedin
- Burnazyan State Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - V V Breder
- Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
| | - N N Britskaya
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - S E Voskanyan
- Granov Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - V A Vishnevsky
- Vishnevsky National Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russia
| | - D A Granov
- Blokhin National Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - L G Zhukova
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - V E Zagainov
- National Medical Research Radiological Center, Obninsk, Russia
| | - D E Kovalenko
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A A Koroleva
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Yu V Kulezneva
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - O V Melekhina
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Nazarenko
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - M V Odintsova
- Blokhin National Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - L O Petrov
- Novosibirsk Regional State Hospital, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | | | - D V Podluzhny
- Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
| | - A N Polyakov
- Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia
| | - I A Porshennikov
- Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - I O Rutkin
- Blokhin National Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - N N Semenov
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - P V Tarakanov
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - P S Feoktistova
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - V V Tsvirkun
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Zhao
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Shabunin
- Burnazyan State Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - M G Efanov
- Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Practical Center, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nevermann N, Bode J, Vischer M, Krenzien F, Lurje G, Pelzer U, Fehrenbach U, Auer TA, Schmelzle M, Pratschke J, Schöning W. Perioperative outcome and long-term survival for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after portal vein embolization and subsequent resection: A propensity-matched study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:107100. [PMID: 37918318 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In view of the high therapeutic value of surgical resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICC), our study addresses the question of clinical management and outcome in case of borderline resectability requiring hypertrophy induction of the future liver remnant prior to resection. METHODS Clinical data was collected of all primary ICC cases receiving major liver resection with or without prior portal vein embolization (PVE) from a single high-volume center. PVE was performed via a percutaneous transhepatic access. Propensity score matching was performed. Perioperative morbidity was assessed as well as long-term survival with a minimum follow-up of 36 months. RESULTS No significant difference in perioperative morbidity was seen between the PVE and the control group. For the PVE group, median OS was 28 months vs. 37 months for the control group (p = 0.418), median DFS 18 and 14 months (p = 0.703). Disease progression during hypertrophy was observed in 38% of cases. Here, OS and DFS was reduced to 18 months (p = 0.479) and 6 months (p = 0.013), respectively. In case of positive N-status or multifocal tumor (MF+) OS was also reduced (18 vs. 26 months, p = 0.033; MF+: 9 vs. 36months p = 0.013). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the surgical therapy in case of borderline resectability offers acceptable results with non-inferior OS rates compared to cases without preoperative hypertrophy induction and comparable oncological features. In the presence of additional risk factors (multifocal tumor, lymph node metastasis, PD during hypertrophy) the OS is notably reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Nevermann
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité-Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Germany
| | - J Bode
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité-Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Germany
| | - M Vischer
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité-Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Germany
| | - F Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité-Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Germany; Clinical Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany
| | - G Lurje
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité-Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Germany
| | - U Pelzer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - U Fehrenbach
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - T A Auer
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité-Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Germany
| | - J Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité-Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Germany
| | - W Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité-Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mehrabi A, Golriz M, Ramouz A, Khajeh E, Hammad A, Hackert T, Müller-Stich B, Strobel O, Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh S, Ghamarnejad O, Al-Saeedi M, Springfeld C, Rupp C, Mayer P, Mieth M, Goeppert B, Hoffmann K, Büchler MW. Promising Outcomes of Modified ALPPS for Staged Hepatectomy in Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5613. [PMID: 38067316 PMCID: PMC10705795 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a two-stage procedure that can potentially cure patients with large cholangiocarcinoma. The current study evaluates the impact of modifications on the outcomes of ALPPS in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. In this single-center study, a series of 30 consecutive patients with cholangiocarcinoma (22 extrahepatic and 8 intrahepatic) who underwent ALPPS between 2011 and 2021 was evaluated. The ALPPS procedure in our center was modified in 2016 by minimizing the first stage of the surgical procedure through biliary externalization after the first stage, antibiotic administration during the interstage phase, and performing biliary reconstructions during the second stage. The rate of postoperative major morbidity and 90-day mortality, as well as the one- and three-year disease-free and overall survival rates were calculated and compared between patients operated before and after 2016. The ALPPS risk score before the second stage of the procedure was lower in patients who were operated on after 2016 (before 2016: median 6.4; after 2016: median 4.4; p = 0.010). Major morbidity decreased from 42.9% before 2016 to 31.3% after 2016, and the 90-day mortality rate decreased from 35.7% before 2016 to 12.5% after 2016. The three-year survival rate increased from 40.8% before 2016 to 73.4% after 2016. Our modified ALPPS procedure improved perioperative and postoperative outcomes in patients with extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Minimizing the first step of the ALPPS procedure was key to these improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammad Golriz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ali Ramouz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elias Khajeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ahmed Hammad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Omid Ghamarnejad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammed Al-Saeedi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Springfeld
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Rupp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Mayer
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Mieth
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Goeppert
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katrin Hoffmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W. Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kawano F, Yoshioka R, Ichida H, Mise Y, Saiura A. Essential updates 2021/2022: Update in surgical strategy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:848-855. [PMID: 37927920 PMCID: PMC10623956 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Resection is the only potential curative treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC); however, complete resection is often technically challenging due to the anatomical location. Various innovative approaches and procedures were invented to circumvent this limitation but the rates of postoperative morbidity (20%-78%) and mortality (2%-15%) are still high. In patients diagnosed with resectable PHC, deliberate and coordinated preoperative workup and optimization of the patient and future liver remnant are crucial. Biliary drainage is recommended to relieve obstructive jaundice and optimize the clinical condition before liver resection. Biliary drainage for PHC can be performed either by endoscopic biliary drainage or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. To date there is no consensus about which method is preferred. The volumetric assessment of the future remnant liver volume and optimization mainly using portal vein embolization is the gold standard in the management of the risk to develop post hepatectomy liver failure. The improvement of systemic chemotherapy has contributed to prolong the survival not only in patients with unresectable PHC but also in patients undergoing curative surgery. In this article, we review the literature and discuss the current surgical treatment of PHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumihiro Kawano
- Department of Hepatobiliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryJuntendo University Graduate School of MedicineHongo, TokyoJapan
| | - Ryuji Yoshioka
- Department of Hepatobiliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryJuntendo University Graduate School of MedicineHongo, TokyoJapan
| | - Hirofumi Ichida
- Department of Hepatobiliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryJuntendo University Graduate School of MedicineHongo, TokyoJapan
| | - Yoshihiro Mise
- Department of Hepatobiliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryJuntendo University Graduate School of MedicineHongo, TokyoJapan
| | - Akio Saiura
- Department of Hepatobiliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryJuntendo University Graduate School of MedicineHongo, TokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Balci D, Nadalin S, Mehrabi A, Alikhanov R, Fernandes ESM, Di Benedetto F, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Björnsson B, Efanov M, Capobianco I, Clavien PA, Kirimker EO, Petrowsky H. Revival of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: An international multicenter study with promising outcomes. Surgery 2023; 173:1398-1404. [PMID: 36959071 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma has been considered to be contraindicated due to the initial poor results. Given the recent reports of improved outcomes, we aimed to collect the recent experiences of different centers performing associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma to analyze factors related to improved outcomes. METHODS This proof-of-concept study collected contemporary cases of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and analyzed for morbidity, short and long-term survival, and factors associated with outcomes. RESULTS In total, 39 patients from 8 centers underwent associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma from 2010 to 2020. The median preoperative future liver remnant volume was 323 mL (155-460 mL). The median future liver remnant increase was 58.7% (8.9% -264.5%) with a median interstage interval of 13 days (6-60 days). Post-stage 1 and post-stage 2 biliary leaks occurred in 2 (7.7%) and 4 (15%) patients. Six patients (23%) after stage 1 and 6 (23%) after stage 2 experienced grade 3 or higher complications. Two patients (7.7%) died within 90 days after stage 2. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 92%, 69%, and 55%, respectively. A subgroup analysis revealed poor survival for patients undergoing additional vascular resection and lymph node positivity. Lymph node-negative patients showed excellent survival demonstrated by 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival of 86%, 86%, and 86%. CONCLUSION This study highlights that the critical attitude toward associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma needs to be revised. In selected patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy can achieve favorable survival that compares to the outcome of established surgical treatment strategies reported in benchmark studies for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma including 1-stage hepatectomy and liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniz Balci
- Department of Surgery, Bahcesehir University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ruslan Alikhanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Center Named After Loginov A.S., Russia
| | - Eduardo S M Fernandes
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Hospital Adventista Silvestre, and Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Center Named After Loginov A.S., Russia
| | - Ivan Capobianco
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplant Center Zürich, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Henrik Petrowsky
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplant Center Zürich, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Patrono D, Colli F, Colangelo M, De Stefano N, Apostu AL, Mazza E, Catalano S, Rizza G, Mirabella S, Romagnoli R. How Can Machine Perfusion Change the Paradigm of Liver Transplantation for Patients with Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12052026. [PMID: 36902813 PMCID: PMC10004136 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12052026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas (pCCA) are rare yet aggressive tumors originating from the bile ducts. While surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, only a minority of patients are amenable to curative resection, and the prognosis of unresectable patients is dismal. The introduction of liver transplantation (LT) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for unresectable pCCA in 1993 represented a major breakthrough, and it has been associated with 5-year survival rates consistently >50%. Despite these encouraging results, pCCA has remained a niche indication for LT, which is most likely due to the need for stringent candidate selection and the challenges in preoperative and surgical management. Machine perfusion (MP) has recently been reintroduced as an alternative to static cold storage to improve liver preservation from extended criteria donors. Aside from being associated with superior graft preservation, MP technology allows for the safe extension of preservation time and the testing of liver viability prior to implantation, which are characteristics that may be especially useful in the setting of LT for pCCA. This review summarizes current surgical strategies for pCCA treatment, with a focus on unmet needs that have contributed to the limited spread of LT for pCCA and how MP could be used in this setting, with a particular emphasis on the possibility of expanding the donor pool and improving transplant logistics.
Collapse
|
16
|
Di Benedetto F, Magistri P, Catellani B, Guerrini GP, Di Sandro S. Robotic Left Hepatectomy with en bloc Caudatectomy and Multiple Biliary Anastomosis for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2832-2833. [PMID: 36790730 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-13091-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Barbara Catellani
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Gian Piero Guerrini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vashist Y, Aigner K, Gailhofer S, Aigner KR. Therapeutic Effect of Regional Chemotherapy in Diffuse Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153701. [PMID: 35954364 PMCID: PMC9367530 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Cholangiocarcinoma are mostly diagnosed at a late stage and early recurrence is also very common with 5-year survival rates of <5% in unresectable, and 33% in resectable disease. Systemic therapy options are limited with unsatisfactory outcome. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of regional chemotherapy in diffuse metastatic cholangiocarcinoma. In 36 diffuse metastatic cholangiocarcinoma patients 189 cycles of regional chemotherapy using arterial infusion and perfusion techniques have been applied. Regional chemotherapy provided an excellent outcome with a median therapy specific survival of 12 months. Regional chemotherapy is effective and superior to current available and proposed therapy options in diffuse metastatic cholangiocarcinoma. Abstract Background: Current therapeutic options in diffuse metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) are limited with unsatisfactory results. We evaluated the efficacy of regional chemotherapy (RegCTx) using arterial infusion (AI), hypoxic stop-flow abdominal perfusion (HAP), upper abdominal perfusion (UAP) and isolated-thoracic perfusion (ITP) in 36 patients with metastatic perihilar and intrahepatic CCC. Methods: Ten patients had previously undergone a liver resection and in 14 patients the previous systemic chemotherapy (sCTx) approach had failed. A total of 189 RegCTx cycles (90 AI, 74 UAP, 13 HAP and 12 ITP) were applied using cisplatin alone or with Adriamycin and Mitomycin C. A minimum of three cycles were applied in 75% of the study population. The response was evaluated using RECIST criteria with MediasStat 28.5.14. Mortality, morbidity and survival analysis were performed using a prospective follow-up database and SPSS–28.0. Results: No procedure related mortality occurred. The overall morbidity was 56% and dominated by lymph fistulas at the inguinal access site. No grade III or IV haematological complication occurred. The overall response rate was 38% partial response, 41% stable and 21% progressive disease. Median overall survival was 23 months (95%CI 16.3–29.7). The RegCTx specific survival was 12 months (95%CI 6.5–17.5) in completely therapy naive patients but also in patients who had failed a sCTx attempt previously. Conclusion: RegCTx is feasible, safe and superior to the current proposed therapeutic options in metastatic CCC. The role of RegCTx should be determined in a larger cohort of diffuse metastatic CCC patients but also at early stages especially in initially not resectable but potentially resectable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yogesh Vashist
- Clinic for Surgical Oncology, Medias Klinikum Burghausen, Krankenhausstrasse 3a, 84489 Burghausen, Germany; (Y.V.); (S.G.)
- Correspondence: (Y.V.); (K.R.A.)
| | - Kornelia Aigner
- Department of Tumor Biology, Medias Klinikum Burghausen, Krankenhausstrasse 3a, 84489 Burghausen, Germany;
| | - Sabine Gailhofer
- Clinic for Surgical Oncology, Medias Klinikum Burghausen, Krankenhausstrasse 3a, 84489 Burghausen, Germany; (Y.V.); (S.G.)
| | - Karl R. Aigner
- Clinic for Surgical Oncology, Medias Klinikum Burghausen, Krankenhausstrasse 3a, 84489 Burghausen, Germany; (Y.V.); (S.G.)
- Correspondence: (Y.V.); (K.R.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vaghiri S, Alaghmand Nejad S, Kasprowski L, Prassas D, Safi SA, Schimmöller L, Krieg A, Rehders A, Lehwald-Tywuschik N, Knoefel WT. A single center comparative retrospective study of in situ split plus portal vein ligation versus conventional two-stage hepatectomy for cholangiocellular carcinoma. Acta Chir Belg 2022:1-12. [PMID: 35317718 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2022.2056680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCA) has a poor prognosis and the goldstandard even in locally advanced cases remains radical surgical resection. This approach however is limited by the future liver remnant volume (FLRV) after extensive parenchymal dissection leading to post-operative liver failure and high mortality rates. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of in situ liver transection with portal vein ligation (ISLT) procedure and conventional two-stage hepatectomy with portal vein embolization (PVE/TSH) in patients with CCA. METHODS All patients with CCA and insufficient FLR considered for either ISLT or PVE/TSH were analyzed for outcomes including post-operative morbidity, mortality, and overall survival rates (OS). RESULTS Sixteen patients received ISLT and eight patients underwent PVE/TSH. The completion rate of the second stage in the PVE/TSH group was 62% and 100% in the ISLT group (p = 0.027). The overall 90-day morbidity rates including severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3b) were comparable (PVE/TSH 40% vs. ISLT 69%, p = 0.262). The median OS (PVE/TSH 7 months vs. ISLT 3 months) and the 90-day mortality rates (PVE/TSH 0% vs. ISLT 50%) did not significantly differ between the two groups (p > 0.05). In multivariate analysis, biliary resection and reconstruction was the only risk factor independently associated with 90-day post-operative morbidity [HR = 20.0; 95%CI (1.68-238.63); p = 0.018]. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate comparable outcomes in both groups in a rather prognostically unfavorable disease. The completion rate in the ISLT group was significantly higher than in the PVE/TSH cohort. This work encourages specialized hepato-biliary-pancreatic centers in applying the ISLT procedure in selected cases with CCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha Vaghiri
- Department of Surgery A, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Laszlo Kasprowski
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Prassas
- Department of Surgery A, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Sami-Alexander Safi
- Department of Surgery A, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Lars Schimmöller
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas Krieg
- Department of Surgery A, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Alexander Rehders
- Department of Surgery A, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Manzia TM, Parente A, Lenci I, Sensi B, Milana M, Gazia C, Signorello A, Angelico R, Grassi G, Tisone G, Baiocchi L. Moving forward in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:1939-1955. [PMID: 35070034 PMCID: PMC8713313 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i12.1939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite being the second most frequent primary liver tumor in humans, early diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are still unsatisfactory. In fact, survival after 5 years is expected in less than one fourth of patients diagnosed with this disease. Rare incidence, late appearance of symptoms and heterogeneous biology are all factors contributing to our limited knowledge of this cancer and determining its poor prognosis in the clinical setting. Several efforts have been made in the last decades in order to achieve an improved classification/understanding with regard to the diverse CCA forms. Location within the biliary tree has helped to distinguish between intrahepatic, perihilar and distal CCA types. Sequence analysis contributed to identifying several characteristic genetic aberrations in CCA that may also serve as possible targets for therapy. Novel findings are expected to significantly improve the management of this malignancy in the near future. In this changing scenario our review focuses on the current and future strategies for CCA treatment. Both systemic and surgical treatments are discussed in detail. The results of the main studies in this field are reported, together with the ongoing trials. The current findings suggest that an integrated multidisciplinary approach to this malignancy would be helpful to improve its outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso M Manzia
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Alessandro Parente
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Ilaria Lenci
- Hepatology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Martina Milana
- Hepatology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Carlo Gazia
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | | | - Roberta Angelico
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Grassi
- Hepatology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tisone
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Di Benedetto F, Magistri P, Guerrini GP, Di Sandro S. Robotic liver partition and portal vein embolization for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Updates Surg 2021; 74:773-777. [PMID: 34846695 PMCID: PMC8630284 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01209-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is one of the most complex challenges for hepatobiliary surgeons. Poor results and high incidence of morbidity after Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for pCCA discouraged this indication. It has been proposed that minimally invasive approach for ALPPS first stage, as well as combination of surgical liver partition and radiologic portal vein embolization (PVE), may improve outcomes reducing interstage morbidity. We report a case of right trisectionectomy with enbloc caudatectomy ALPPS scheduled for pCCA with robotic approach at stage-1, the full video is provided as supplementary material. Due to intraoperative presence of portal vein tumor infiltration during hilar dissection (no evidence in the pre-operative work-up), a radiologic right PVE was performed after stage-1 instead of portal vein ligation, followed by portal vein resection and biductal hepatico-jejunostomy at stage-2 with open approach. The patient was a 74-year-old female diagnosed with 3-cm mass-forming pCCA. The total clean liver volume was 1231 cc, with future liver remnant (FLR) volume of 25.1% (segments II and III). She was discharged in the interstage interval on postoperative day (POD) 4; CT scan on POD 12 showed that FLR increased up to 33% (369 cc) (Fig. 1). ALPPS was completed on POD 17, the postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged in good general condition on POD 19 after stage-2. Besides the already demonstrated advantages in terms of reduced interstage morbidity, robotic ALPPS represents a promising strategy to expand surgical indication in patients with pCCA. The combination of liver partition and PVE may increase the opportunities to perform radical resections in selected patients with pCCA and portal vein infiltration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy.
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Gian Piero Guerrini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Largo del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nooijen LE, Swijnenburg RJ, Klümpen HJ, Verheij J, Kazemier G, van Gulik TM, Erdmann JI. Surgical Therapy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: State of the Art. Visc Med 2021; 37:18-25. [PMID: 33708815 PMCID: PMC7923954 DOI: 10.1159/000514032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical therapy still offers the only chance of long-term survival for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the current standards and challenges in the surgical treatment of pCCA. SUMMARY After imaging and defining resectability, the first step towards optimal surgical treatment is optimizing biliary drainage and preventing cholangitis, followed by securing adequate future liver remnant volume and/or function. The main goal of resection for pCCA is achieving radical resection and ultimately long-term survival. In order to achieve radical resection, several points will be addressed (e.g., vascular resection and reconstruction, intraoperative frozen sections, right versus left hemihepatectomy, and the usefulness of preoperative [chemo]therapy). KEY MESSAGES In order to optimize long-term outcomes for patients with pCCA, collaboration between leading centers should be increased. In addition, this collaboration is necessary to design large prospective randomized controlled trials, as the incidence of pCCA is low and the number of resectable patients is even lower. Currently, most results are based on small retrospective cohort studies resulting in low evidence. In order to properly investigate how to improve long-term survival, we need to set up trials to confirm the results of small series suggesting the positive effect of preoperative chemotherapy and extended lymph node resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn E. Nooijen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas M. van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joris I. Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ekser B, Halazun KJ, Petrowsky H, Balci D. Liver transplantation and hepatobiliary surgery in 2020. Int J Surg 2020; 82S:1-3. [PMID: 32698032 PMCID: PMC7369005 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Burcin Ekser
- Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Karim J Halazun
- Department of Surgery, Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Henrik Petrowsky
- Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Deniz Balci
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|