A meta-analysis on surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy to treat squamous cell esophageal carcinoma

Survival benefits of postoperative radiotherapy in esophageal cancer during the immunotherapy era:a retrospective cohort study based on the SEER database and a single-center registry in China

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the survival benefits of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with resectable esophageal cancer (EC) after neoadjuvant therapy in the Immunotherapy era.

Methods

The study was designed as a retrospective cohort study, which included a total of 733 patients with EC from the SEER database and a single-center cohort. We used propensity score matching (PSM) to equilibrate patient characteristics. The investigation incorporated Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the Cox proportional risk regression model to assess outcomes.

Results

PORT did not significantly improve survival in the overall cohort, with a median overall survival of 38 months (p=0.56) in the SEER cohort and 39 months (p=0.75) in the Chinese cohort. However, in the immunotherapy subgroup, the Chinese cohort demonstrated that immunotherapy combined with PORT significantly improved survival (p=0.044).Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that patients aged 50-59 years (HR=5.93, 95% CI: 1.67-21.06) and those aged ≥70 years (HR=10.96, 95% CI:3.04-39.56) had increased survival risks compared to patients aged <50 years. Additionally, ypT3-4 stage patients exhibited a higher risk than those with ypT1-2 stage (HR=2.12, 95% CI: 1.14-3.93, p=0.017).Similar trends were observed in cT3-4 staging, R1/R2 and no immunotherapy. Lymph node metastasis also showed a progressive relationship with survival risk, with patients categorized as ypN1 (HR=1.90), ypN2 (HR=4.24), and ypN3 (HR=6.68) experiencing increasingly higher risks (p<0.05).

Conclusions

The collaborative effect of immunotherapy and PORT potentially enhances survival outcomes for patients with EC. However, further prospective research is essential to confirm our results.

Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy Benefits Non-pCR Patients Rather Than pCR Patients for Locally Advanced ESCC: A Multicenter Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

There is no unified standard in adjuvant therapy (AT) for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery. We evaluated the significance of AT for these patients and explored its influencing factors.

METHODS

ESCC patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and surgery from 2019 to 2022 at three centers were divided into AT (n = 227) and non-AT groups (n = 435). Baseline characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM). Primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Subgroup analyses and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify the prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period is 36 (2-72) months. After PSM, the total population had 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates of 71.3%, 66.0%, and 64.1%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in DFS (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.55-1.14, p = 0.21) or OS (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.49-1.13, p = 0.17) between AT and non-AT groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that non-pCR patients benefited from AT in DFS (p = 0.042) and OS (p = 0.033). Moreover, in non-pCR patients who received AT, BMI ≥ 21.5 kg/m2 and ypN0 were independent protective factors of DFS. ypN0 was an independent protective factor of OS. In terms of AT regimens, the Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that adjuvant immunochemotherapy (AICT) provided superior survival benefits than adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative AT benefited ESCC patients with non-pCR, while AICT may be a relatively better AT regimen in real-world data, which deserves further exploration.

Comparison of long-term survival of neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery versus upfront surgery and the role of adjuvant therapy for T1b-2N0-1 esophageal cancer: a population study of the SEER database and Chinese cohort

BACKGROUND

For stage T1b-2N0-1 esophageal cancer, the impact of neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery (NS), surgery alone (SA), and surgery plus adjuvant therapy (ST) on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) is uncertain.

METHODS

Stage T1b-2N0-1 esophageal cancer patients from the SEER database and two Chinese cancer centers were included in this study. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival curves, which were compared using the log-rank test. Propensity score matching was used to equalize differences between the groups. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze prognostic factors. A nomogram for OS was developed after screening the variables using the Cox proportional hazards regression model and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The performance of the nomogram was assessed by the Harrell concordance index (C-index), the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching analysis, the 3-year CSS and OS rates in the NS group compared to the SA group were 80.3% versus 62.1% ( P =0.016) and 75.8% versus 55.5% ( P =0.006), the 3-year CSS and OS rates in the NS group compared to the ST group were 71.3% versus 68.3% ( P =0.560) and 69.8% versus 62.9% ( P =0.330), the 3-year CSS and OS rates in the SA group compared to the ST group were 54.6% versus 66.7% ( P =0.220) and 50.2% versus 57.9% ( P =0.290), respectively. The predictive nomogram for OS in T1b-2N0-1 patients ultimately incorporated five clinicopathological variables: T stage, N stage, age, examined lymph nodes, and therapy modality. The nomogram C-index for predicting OS was 0.648, 0.663, and 0.666 in the training group, external validation group-1, and external validation group-2, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year predicted AUC values of the OS prediction model were 0.659, 0.639, and 0.612 for the training group, and 0.786, 0.758, and 0.692 for validation group-1, and 0.805, 0.760, and 0.693 for validation group-2, respectively.

CONCLUSION

For patients with stage T1b-2N0-1 esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant therapy significantly improves prognosis compared to surgery alone, those presenting with positive lymph nodes after upfront surgery can achieve survival benefits from adjuvant therapy.

Postoperative adjuvant immunotherapy for pathological stage II-IVa esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical surgery does not improve disease-free recurrence rates

Background/objectives

Postoperative adjuvant therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) primarily includes chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. The survival benefits of postoperative adjuvant therapy for R0-resected ESCC remain controversial. Immunotherapy is being gradually applied perioperatively for esophageal cancer, but the efficacy of postoperative immunotherapy in ESCC is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative immunotherapy for esophageal cancer. Toward this goal, we explored the differences between postoperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy alone.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent radical surgery for esophageal cancer at Gaozhou People's Hospital between January 2020 and August 2022 and received postoperative adjuvant therapy. Patients were divided into two groups according to the adjuvant treatment regimens: postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) and postoperative adjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (aICT) groups. Data on baseline characteristics, surgical-related indicators, adverse event rates during adjuvant therapy, and 2-year postoperative follow-up were collected for both groups.

Results

A total of 76 patients were included: 36 and 40 patients in the aICT and aCT groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups. During the adjuvant treatment period, the incidence of hypothyroidism was significantly higher in the aICT group than in the aCT group (25.0% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.007). During the 2-year follow-up, local and recurrence rates were 17.5 and 12.5% in the aCT group and 13.9 and 5.6% in the aICT group, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.489).

Conclusion

For patients with pathologically confirmed locally advanced ESCC after surgery, postoperative immunotherapy did not confer better disease-free recurrence rates compared to postoperative adjuvant therapy. Nonetheless, with research advancements, the role of immunotherapy in the treatment of ESCC is likely to expand, offering new hope for these patients.

Propensity-matched study on locally advanced esophageal cancer: surgery versus post-operative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study aims to delineate the long-term outcomes and recurrence patterns of locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) patients managed with or without postoperative radiotherapy (PORT).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort from two academic centers, encompassing patients who initially underwent esophagectomy and were pathologically staged T3-4, was analyzed. Survival outcomes were constructed using Kaplan-Meier method, with survival significance was evaluated using the log-rank test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to balance potential selection bias.

RESULTS

Among the 506 patients, 251 underwent surgery alone and 255 received radiotherapy following radical surgery. With a median follow-up of 49.1 months, PORT significantly improved 5-year overall survival (53.8% vs. 25.3%; p < 0.001) and 5-year disease-free survival rates (45.3% vs. 8.5%; p < 0.001) compared to surgery alone. These differences in survival outcomes persisted even after PSM (p < 0.001 for both). Treatment failure was significantly less frequent in the PORT group (46.7%) compared to the surgery-only group (90.0%; p < 0.001), with corresponding reductions in locoregional recurrence (9.4% vs. 54.1%; p < 0.001). This underscores the significant association between PORT and disease control.

CONCLUSION

The absence of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy highlights the importance of PORT in improving survival and reducing recurrence in advanced T3-4 TESCC patients. This study underscores the importance of PORT as a salvage treatment for locally advanced TESCC patients without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Vasculogenic mimicry triggers early recidivation and resistance to adjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of vasculogenic mimicry (VM) and postoperative adjuvant therapy on the prognosis and survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), as well as to assess whether VM affects the clinical benefit of postoperative adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective analysis included patients who underwent radical surgery for ESCC, which was documented in the medical record system. The presence or absence of VM in surgical specimens was determined using double staining with PAS/CD31. Stratification was applied based on adjuvant therapy and VM status. Survival curves and COX modeling were used to analyze the impact of the presence or absence of VM on the benefit of adjuvant therapy and the survival prognosis of patients.

RESULTS

VM-positive patients were more prone to postoperative recurrence and metastasis. VM was identified as an independent risk factor for progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.001, 95% CI:1.809-3.852) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001, 95% CI:1.603-2.786) in postoperative ESCC. Postoperative adjuvant therapy significantly prolonged PFS (p = 0.008) and OS time (p < 0.001) in patients with stage II and III ESCC, with concurrent chemoradiotherapy being the most effective. However, the presence of VM significantly reduced the benefits of postoperative adjuvant therapy (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

VM negatively impacts the prognosis of postoperative ESCC patients and reduces the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Predictive potential of preoperative Naples prognostic score-based nomogram model for the prognosis in surgical resected thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: A retrospective cohort study

The present study aimed to establish an effective prognostic nomogram model based on the Naples prognostic score (NPS) for resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). A total of 277 patients with ESCC, who underwent standard curative esophagectomy and designated as study cohort, were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into different groups, including NPS 0, NPS 1, NPS 2, and NPS 3 or 4 groups, for further analysis, and the results were validated in an external cohort of 122 ESCC patients, who underwent surgery at another cancer center. In our multivariate analysis of the study cohort showed that the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, systemic inflammation score, and NPS were the independent prognostic factors for the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) durations. In addition, the differential grade was also an independent prognostic factor for the OS in the patients with ESCC after surgery (all P < .05). The area under the curve of receiver operator characteristics for the PFS and OS prediction with systemic inflammation score and NPS were 0.735 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.676-0.795, P < .001) and 0.835 (95% CI 0.786-0.884, P < .001), and 0.734 (95% CI 0.675-0.793, P < .001) and 0.851 (95% CI 0.805-0.896, P < .001), respectively. The above independent predictors for OS or PFS were all selected in the nomogram model. The concordance indices (C-indices) of the nomogram models for predicting OS and PFS were 0.718 (95% CI 0.681-0.755) and 0.669 (95% CI 0.633-0.705), respectively, which were higher than that of the 7th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system [C-index 0.598 (95% CI 0.558-0.638) for OS and 0.586 (95% CI 0.546-0.626) for PFS]. The calibration curves for predicting the 5-year OS or PFS showed a good agreement between the prediction by nomogram and actual observation. In the external validation cohort, the nomogram discrimination for OS was better than that of the 7th edition of TNM staging systems [C-index: 0.697 (95% CI 0.639-0.755) vs 0.644 (95% CI 0.589-0.699)]. The calibration curves showed good consistency in predicting the 5-year survival between the actual observation and nomogram predictions. The decision curve also showed a higher potential of the clinical application of predicting the 5-years OS of the proposed nomogram model as compared to that of the 7th edition of TNM staging systems. The preoperative NPS-based nomogram model had a certain potential role for predicting the prognosis of ESCC patients.

Esophageal cancer - French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, SFP, RENAPE, SNFCP, AFEF, SFR)

INTRODUCTION

This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of esophageal cancer (EC) published in July 2022, available on the website of the French Society of Gastroenterology (SNFGE) (www.tncd.org).

METHODS

This collaborative work was conducted under the auspices of several French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of EC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B and C), according to the level of evidence found in the literature until April 2022.

RESULTS

EC diagnosis and staging evaluation are mainly based on patient's general condition assessment, endoscopy plus biopsies, TAP CT-scan and 18F FDG-PET. Surgery alone is recommended for early-stage EC, while locally advanced disease (N+ and/or T3-4) is treated with perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT) or preoperative chemoradiation (CROSS regimen) followed by immunotherapy for adenocarcinoma. Preoperative chemoradiation (CROSS regimen) followed by immunotherapy or definitive chemoradiation with the possibility of organ preservation are the two options for squamous cell carcinoma. Salvage surgery is recommended for incomplete response or recurrence after definitive chemoradiation and should be performed in an expert center. Treatment for metastatic disease is based on systemic therapy including chemotherapy, immunotherapy or combined targeted therapy according to biomarkers testing such as HER2 status, MMR status and PD-L1 expression.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines are intended to provide a personalised therapeutic strategy for daily clinical practice and are subject to ongoing optimization. Each individual case should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team.

Low versus high dose of postoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the effect of different postoperative radiotherapy doses on the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

A total of 199 patients (aged 18-75 years) with locally advanced ESCC who underwent esophagectomy and postoperative radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy at the Fujian Cancer Hospital between July 2008 and January 2018 were included. Based on the postoperative radiotherapy dose, the patients were divided into a low-dose group (50-50.4 Gy; median dose 50 Gy) and a high-dose group (>50.4 Gy; median dose 60 Gy). Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens included PF (fluorouracil and cisplatin) and TP (paclitaxel and cisplatin) regimens. Patients were followed-up every 3 months in the first 2 years after surgery, every 6 months for the next 3 years, and then subsequently once a year. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. The propensity-score matching (PSM) method was applied to identify a 1:1, well-balanced matched cohort with 33 patients in each group for survival comparison.

Results

Among the 199 patients enrolled in this study, 144 and 55 were in the low-dose and high-dose groups, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that pathological N classification, vascular tumor emboli, and postoperative radiotherapy dose were independent prognostic factors for both OS and PFS, all p < 0.05. Before PSM, the OS and the PFS of the low-dose group were significantly longer than those of the high-dose group, both p < 0.05. After PSM, better OS and PFS rates were observed in the low-dose group, both p < 0.05. The results showed that patients with pathological stages N0-2 or N3, negative surgical margins, and no vascular tumor emboli could obtain a significant benefit in both OS and PFS after treatment with a low dose of postoperative radiotherapy (50-50.4 Gy). In the subgroup with positive surgical margins, treatment with a low dose of postoperative radiotherapy offered a non-significant survival benefit compared to treatment with a high dose of postoperative radiotherapy.

Conclusions

Our study revealed that for patients with ESCC, the low-dose group (50-50.4 Gy) had a significantly higher OS and PFS than the high-dose group (>50.4 Gy). It was suggested that 50-50.4 Gy might be the recommended postoperative radiotherapy dose for ESCC patients.

Management of Esophago-Gastric Junction Carcinoma: A Narrative Multidisciplinary Review

Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) carcinoma represents a specific site of disease, given the opportunities for multimodal clinical care and management and the possibilities of combined treatments. It encompasses various clinical subgroups of disease that are heterogeneous and deserve different treatments; therefore, the guidelines have progressively evolved over time, considering the evidence provided by clinical trials. The aim of this narrative review was to summarize the main evidence, which orientates the current guidelines, and to collect the main ongoing studies to address existing gray areas.

Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy affect the prognosis of esophageal cancer: A SEER analysis

The principal treatment modalities for esophageal cancer are radiation, chemotherapy and surgery or a combination of them. In some sense, technological advances have tremendously heightened patients' survival rates. Nevertheless, the debate on the prognostic value of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) has never ceased. On that account, this study made an effort to probe deep into the effects of PORT and surgery on the prognosis of stage III esophageal cancer. Our study included patients diagnosed with stage III esophageal cancer between 2004 and 2015 through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) on the basis of whether surgery was carried out and whether PORT conducted. We identified the independent risk factors by multivariate Cox regression and constructed a nomogram model. In this research, we included 3940 patients, and the median follow-up is 14 months: 1932 cases without surgery; 2008 cases with surgery, and 322 cases of them underwent PORT. In the postPSM patient cohort, patients who underwent surgery had a median overall survival rate (OS) of 19.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.2-20.8) and a median cancer-specific survival rate (CSS) of 23.0 (95% CI 20.6-25.3) months, which were remarkably higher than those without surgery (P < .001). The OS（P < .05）and CSS（P < .05）of the patients who underwent PORT were lower than those who did not. Similar results were obtained in the groups of N0 and N1. This study revealed surgery can heighten patients' survival rate, while PORT could not elevate patients' survival rate in stage III esophageal cancer patients.

Expression of Polyadenylate-binding Protein Cytoplasmic 1 (PABPC1) in Combination With RAD51 as Prognostic Biomarker in Patients Who Underwent Postoperative Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Molecular markers in the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who received postoperative treatments are lacking. This research aims to evaluate the prognostic value of polyadenylate-binding protein cytoplasmic 1 (PABPC1) alone and in combination with RAD51 in ESCC patients who underwent postoperative chemotherapy (CT). A total of 103 ESCC patients who underwent postoperative CT and 103 matched ones who received surgery alone were analyzed in this study. PABPC1 and RAD51 expression was assessed in cancer samples by immunohistochemistry. PABPC1 high expression (PABPC1-HE) but not that of RAD51 was associated with poor patients' survival, regardless of the postoperative treatment or node status. Patients with PABPC1 low expression and RAD51 negative expression [RAD51- (PABPC1-LE/RAD51-)] tumor had good overall survival (OS) in both the CT treated and untreated groups. Patients with PABPC1-LE/RAD51+ and PABPC1-HE/RAD51+ tumors had longer OS in the CT treated group than in the untreated group. However, PABPC1-HE/RAD51- was associated with a poor outcome in both groups and the patients with PABPC1-HE/RAD51- tumor had hardly any benefit from CT in N+ status. PABPC1 alone and in combination with RAD51 was a prognostic biomarker for OS in ESCC patients who received postoperative CT.

Repurposed pizotifen malate targeting NRF2 exhibits anti-tumor activity through inducing ferroptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Targeted therapy attempts are needed to enhance esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients' overall survival and satisfaction of life. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), as a high-confidence cancer driver gene, controls the antioxidant response, metabolic balance and redox homeostasis in cancer and is regarded as a potent molecular target for cancer treatment. Here, we attempted to find a new NRF2 inhibitor and study the underlying molecular mechanism in ESCC. We found that up-regulated NRF2 protein was negatively correlated with patient prognosis and promoted tumor proliferation in ESCC. Moreover, Pizotifen malate (PZM), a FDA-approved medication, bound to the Neh1 domain of NRF2 and prevented NRF2 protein binding to the ARE motif of target genes, suppressing transcription activity of NRF2. PZM treatment suppressed tumor development in ESCC PDX model by inducing ferroptosis via down-regulating the transcription of GPX4, GCLC, ME1 and G6PD. Our study illustrates that the over expression of NRF2 indicates poor prognosis and promotes tumor proliferation in ESCC. PZM, as a novel NRF2 inhibitor, inhibits the tumor growth by inducing ferroptosis and elucidates a potent NRF2-based therapy strategy for patients with ESCC.

Is Adjuvant Therapy a Better Option for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With Esophagectomy? A Prognosis Prediction Model Based on Multicenter Real-World Data

OBJECTIVE

To construct a prediction model for more precise evaluation of prognosis which will allow personalized treatment recommendations for adjuvant therapy in patients following resection of ESCC.

BACKGROUND

Marked heterogeneity of patient prognosis and limited evidence regarding survival benefit of various adjuvant therapy regimens pose challenges in the clinical treatment of ESCC.

METHODS

Based on comprehensive clinical data obtained from 4129 consecutive patients with resected ESCC in a high-risk region in China, we identified predictors for overall survival through a 2-phase selection based on Cox proportional hazard regression and minimization of Akaike information criterion. The model was internally validated using bootstrapping and externally validated in 1815 patients from a non-high-risk region in China.

RESULTS

The final model incorporates 9 variables: age, sex, primary site, T stage, N stage, number of lymph nodes harvested, tumor size, adjuvant treatment, and hemoglobin level. A significant interaction was also observed between N stage and adjuvant treatment. N1+ stage patients were likely to benefit from addition of adjuvant therapy as opposed to surgery alone, but adjuvant therapy did not improve overall survival for N0 stage patients. The C -index of the model was 0.729 in the training cohort, 0.723 after bootstrapping, and 0.695 in the external validation cohort. This model outperformed the seventh edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system in prognostic prediction and risk stratification.

CONCLUSIONS

The prediction model constructed in this study may facilitate precise prediction of survival and inform decision-making about adjuvant therapy according to N stage.

Effect of Adjuvant Radiation Dose on Survival in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background: For patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with surgery alone, the incidence of local-regional recurrence remains unfavorable. Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) has been associated with increased local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), although its application is limited by concerns of PORT-related toxicities. Methods: Among 3591 patients with ESCC analyzed in this study, 2765 patients with T3-4N0 and T1-4N1-3 lesions and specific local-regional status information were analyzed in a subsequent analysis of adjuvant radiation dose (aRTD) effect. Application of the restricted cubic spline regression model revealed a non-linear relationship between aRTD and survival/radiotoxicity. Linear regression analysis (LRA) was performed to evaluate correlations between LRFS and overall survival (OS)/ disease-free survival (DFS). Results: For patients staged T1−2N0, T1−2N1−3, T3−4N0, and T3−4N1−3, 5-year OS in PORT and non-PORT groups were 77.38% vs. 72.91%, p = 0.919, 52.35% vs. 46.60%, p = 0.032, 73.41% vs. 61.19%, p = 0.005 and 38.30% vs. 25.97%, p < 0.001. With aRTD escalation, hazard ratios (HRs) of OS/DFS declined until aRTD exceeded 50Gy, then increased, whereas that of LRFS declined until aRTD exceeded 50 Gy, then remained steady. HR of treatment-related mortality was stable until aRTD exceeded 50 Gy, then increased. LRA revealed strong correlations between LRFS and OS/DFS (r = 0.984 and r = 0.952, respectively). An absolute 1% advancement in LRFS resulted in 0.32% and 0.34% improvements in OS and DFS. Conclusions: An aRTD of 50Gy was well-tolerated, with favorable survival resulting from PORT-related LRFS improvement in patients staged T3−4N0 or T1-4N1−3. Further stratification analyses based on tumor burden would help determine potential PORT-beneficiaries.

The usefulness of pretreatment controlling nutritional status score for predicting recurrence in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: A real-world study

Background

The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, as an immune-nutritional index, has been reported to be related to prognosis in several cancers. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) is an emerging pattern for cancer treatment in recent years. However, the usefulness of CONUT in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with nICT has not been reported so far. This study attempted to clarify the usefulness of CONUT in predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in ESCC with nICT.

Methods

Two hundred sixteen ESCC patients receiving nICT between 2019 and 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Based on CONUT, the patients were divided into two groups: low groups (score ≤ 2) and high (score ≥ 3) groups. The relationships between CONUT and clinical characteristics were estimated. Cox regression analyses with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also performed to evaluate the prognostic factors of DFS.

Results

Fifty-nine (27.3%) patients achieved pathologic complete response (pCR), and 30 (13.9%) cases had a recurrence. There were 150 cases (69.4%) in low CONUT group and 66 cases (30.6%) in high CONUT group, respectively. The results revealed that vessel invasion (P = 0.037), postoperative pneumonia (P = 0.001), advanced ypT stage (P = 0.011), cTNM stage (P = 0.007), and ypTNM stage (P < 0.001) were significantly related to patients with a high CONUT score. A high pCR rate was found in patients with a low CONUT score (33.3% vs. 13.6%, P = 0.003), and a high recurrence rate was found in patients with a high CONUT score (24.2% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.004), respectively. Patients with a low CONUT score had a better 1-year DFS than those with a high CONUT score (90.7% vs. 75.8%, P = 0.004). Multivariate analyses indicated that the pretreatment CONUT score was an independent predictor regarding DFS (HR = 2.221, 95% CI: 1.067-4.625, P = 0.033).

Conclusion

A better response and a lower recurrence were found in ESCC patients with a lower pretreatment CONUT. As a useful index for immune-nutritional status, the CONUT might be a reliable prognostic indicator in ESCC patients with nICT.

Anti-CXCL8 Autoantibody: A Potential Diagnostic Biomarker for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background and Objectives: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most common malignancies. Anti-tumor associated antigen autoantibodies (TAAbs) can be used as biomarkers for tumor detection. The aim of this study was to identify a reliable TAAb as the diagnostic marker for ESCC. Materials and Methods: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was used to screen candidate genes. The mRNA expression of the key gene was then verified by micro array dataset GSE44021 from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and the diag nostic value of the corresponding autoantibody to the key gene in ESCC was detected by enzyme-linked im muno sorbent assay (ELISA). Results: CXCL8 was identified as the key gene. The dataset GSE44021 showed that CXCL8 mRNA expression was prominently over-expressed in ESCC tissues compared with normal tissues. ELISA results showed that the level of anti-CXCL8 autoantibody in ESCC patients was significantly higher than in normal controls and the receiver operating char ac teristic (ROC) curve indicated that anti-CXCL8 autoantibody could discriminate ESCC patients from normal controls, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the verification cohort, and the validation cohort were 0.713 and 0.751, respectively. Conclusions: Our study illustrated that anti-CXCL8 autoantibody had good diagnostic value, and may become a candidate biomarker for ESCC.

No survival benefit could be obtained from adjuvant radiotherapy in esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery: A SEER-based analysis

Background

The aim of this study is to assess the clinical benefit of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery via a national population-based database.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with EC between 2004 and 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to compare the overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) difference between PORT vs. no-radiotherapy (RT) groups before and after propensity score matching (PSM). After PSM for baseline characteristics, Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to investigate the factors associated with OS.

Results

A total of 321 patients were included in the analysis. Of them, 91 patients (28%) received PORT. In the unmatched population, the no-RT group had improved OS compared with PORT (44 vs. 25 months, p = 0.002), and CSS was similar in patients undergoing NAC with or without PORT (42 vs. 71 months, p = 0.17). After PSM for baseline characteristics, the OS benefit of the no-RT group over the PORT group remained significant with a median OS of 46 vs. 27 months (p = 0.02), and CSS remained comparable between groups (83 vs. 81 months, p = 0.49). In subgroup analyses, PORT did not improve the OS among patients with adenocarcinoma in the subgroups of cN0, cN1, and cN2–3 (all p &gt; 0.05). In Cox regression, aged ≥71 years old, cT3–4, cN2–3, and receiving PORT were independent predictors of worse OS, whereas cT4 and cN2–3 were independent predictors of worse CSS (all p &lt; 0.05).

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated that no survival benefit could be obtained from the additional use of PORT after NAC and surgery in patients with EC. Well-designed prospective trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Machine Learning and Novel Biomarkers Associated with Immune Infiltration for the Diagnosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) accounts for the main esophageal cancer type, which is related to advanced stage and poor survivals. Therefore, novel diagnostic biomarkers are critically needed. In the current research, we aimed to screen novel diagnostic biomarkers based on machine learning. The expression profiles were obtained from GEO datasets (GSE20347, GSE38129, and GSE75241) and TCGA datasets. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened between 47 ESCC and 47 nontumor samples. The LASSO regression model and SVM-RFE analysis were carried out for the identification of potential markers. ROC analysis was carried out to assess discriminatory abilities. The expressions and diagnostic values of the candidates in ESCC were demonstrated in the GSE75241 datasets and TCGA datasets. We also explore the correlations between the critical genes and cancer immune infiltrates using CIBERSORT. In this study, we identified 27 DEGs in ESCC: 5 genes were significantly elevated, and 22 genes were significantly decreased. Based on the results of the SVM-RFE and LASSO regression model, we identified five potential diagnostic biomarkers for ESCC, including GPX3, COL11A1, EREG, MMP1, and MMP12. However, the diagnostic values of only GPX3, MMP1, and MMP12 were confirmed in GSE75241 datasets. Moreover, in TCGA datasets, we further confirmed that GPX3 expression was distinctly decreased in ESCC specimens, while the expression of MMP1 and MMP12 was noticeably increased in ESCC specimens. Immune cell infiltration analysis revealed that the expression of GPX3, MMP1, and MMP12 was associated with several immune, such as T cells CD8, macrophages M2, macrophages M0, and dendritic cells activated. Overall, our findings suggested GPX3, MMP1, and MMP12 as novel diagnostic marker and correlated with immune infiltrates in ESCC patients.

Exosomal circRNA FNDC3B promotes the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by sponging miR-490-5p and regulating thioredoxin reductase 1 expression

Exosomal circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been reported to play critical roles in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We aimed to investigate the function of exosomal circRNA FNDC3B (circFNDC3B). The RNA levels and protein levels were examined using RT-qPCR and western blot (WB) assays. Colony formation and EdU assays were used to assess cell proliferative ability. Cell migratory and invasive abilities were detected by wound healing and transwell assays. Cell apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry. Glycolysis was measured using commercial kits. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) were applied to examine the morphology and size of exosomes. Dual-luciferase reporter, RIP and RNA pull-down assays assessed the interaction of miR-490-5p with circFNDC3B or thioredoxin reductase 1 (TXNRD1). Xenograft tumor model determined the role of exosomal circFNDC3B in vivo. We observed that circFNDC3B was upregulated in ESCC samples and cells, as well as ESCC-derived exosomes. CircFNDC3B could be delivered via exosomes in tumor cells, and the colony formation, proliferation, migration, invasion, glycolysis, and in vivo growth ability of recipient cells were weakened after co-incubation with exosomal circFNDC3B-knockdown donor cells. CircFNDC3B was a miR-490-5p sponge, and miR-490-5p inhibition reversed the role of exosomal circFNDC3B-downregulating in ESCC cells. TXNRD1 was a miR-490-5p target, and TXNRD1 elevation weakened the anti-cancer function of miR-490-5p upregulation in ESCC cells. CircFNDC3B mediated TXNRD1 expression by interacting with miR-490-5p. In conclusion, exosomal circFNDC3B drove ESCC progression via regulating the miR-490-5p/TXNRD1 axis.AbbreviationsEC: esophageal cancer; ESCC: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; circRNA: circular RNA; WB: western blot; TEM: transmission electron microscopy; NTA: nanoparticle tracking analysis; TXNRD1: thioredoxin reductase 1; IHC: immunohistochemistry; RT-qPCR: reverse transcription-polymerase quantitative chain reaction; GLUT1: glucose transport protein type 1; LDHA: lactate dehydrogenase A.

Esophagectomy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy as initial treatment for clinical stage I esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy and definitive chemoradiotherapy are commonly used in the treatment of stage I esophageal cancer (EC). The present study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of esophagectomy and definitive chemoradiotherapy as the initial treatment for clinical stage I EC.

METHODS

This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020197203). Relevant studies were identified through PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from database inception to June 30, 2020. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was employed to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was employed to compare treatment-related death, complications, and tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 13 non-randomized controlled studies involving 3,346 patients were included. Compared with definitive chemoradiotherapy, esophagectomy showed an improved OS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.86; P < 0.001), PFS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33-0.67; P < 0.001), and a lower risk of tumor recurrence (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.61; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.75-1.65; P = 0.60) and treatment-related death (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.31-4.30; P = 0.84) between the two treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence shows esophagectomy has superior survival benefits as the initial treatment for clinical stage I EC. It is still the preferred choice for patients with clinical stage I EC. However, future high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this conclusion.

Modern Management of Esophageal Cancer: Radio-Oncology in Neoadjuvancy, Adjuvancy and Palliation

The modern management of esophageal cancer is crucially based on a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach. Radiotherapy is involved in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings; moreover, it includes radical and palliative treatment intention (with a focus on the use of a stent and its potential integration with radiotherapy). In this review, the above-mentioned settings and approaches will be described. Referring to available international guidelines, the background evidence bases will be reviewed, and the ongoing, more relevant trials will be outlined. Target definitions and radiotherapy doses to administer will be mentioned. Peculiar applications such as brachytherapy (interventional radiation oncology), and data regarding innovative approaches including MRI-guided-RT and radiomic analysis will be reported. A focus on the avoidance of surgery for major clinical responses (particularly for SCC) is detailed.

Modern Management of Esophageal Cancer: Radio-Oncology in Neoadjuvancy, Adjuvancy and Palliation

The modern management of esophageal cancer is crucially based on a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach. Radiotherapy is involved in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings; moreover, it includes radical and palliative treatment intention (with a focus on the use of a stent and its potential integration with radiotherapy). In this review, the above-mentioned settings and approaches will be described. Referring to available international guidelines, the background evidence bases will be reviewed, and the ongoing, more relevant trials will be outlined. Target definitions and radiotherapy doses to administer will be mentioned. Peculiar applications such as brachytherapy (interventional radiation oncology), and data regarding innovative approaches including MRI-guided-RT and radiomic analysis will be reported. A focus on the avoidance of surgery for major clinical responses (particularly for SCC) is detailed.

Modern Management of Esophageal Cancer: Radio-Oncology in Neoadjuvancy, Adjuvancy and Palliation

The modern management of esophageal cancer is crucially based on a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach. Radiotherapy is involved in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings; moreover, it includes radical and palliative treatment intention (with a focus on the use of a stent and its potential integration with radiotherapy). In this review, the above-mentioned settings and approaches will be described. Referring to available international guidelines, the background evidence bases will be reviewed, and the ongoing, more relevant trials will be outlined. Target definitions and radiotherapy doses to administer will be mentioned. Peculiar applications such as brachytherapy (interventional radiation oncology), and data regarding innovative approaches including MRI-guided-RT and radiomic analysis will be reported. A focus on the avoidance of surgery for major clinical responses (particularly for SCC) is detailed.

Trichostatin A enhances radiosensitivity and radiation-induced DNA damage of esophageal cancer cells

Background

Trichostatin A (TSA) is emerging as a potential component of anticancer therapy. In this study, we aimed to identify the radiosensitizing effects of TSA in esophageal squamous carcinoma cell lines and identify the genomic alteration of histone acetylation associated with TSA treatment.

Methods

EC109 and KYSE450 cells were pretreated with TSA (0.1 µM) for 12 hours prior to irradiation, and the cell viability, flow cytometry, and comet assays were performed to analyze cell growth, cell apoptosis, and DNA damage, respectively. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-Seq) was performed to identify the acetylation sites of histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9), which was altered by TSA.

Results

Our data showed that TSA could sensitize esophageal cancer cells to radiation by inducing cell cycle arrest and increasing cell apoptosis. DNA damage induced by radiation was enhanced by TSA treatment. In addition, a total of 105 differential peak-related genes were found to be associated with TSA treatment, which was identified using ChIP-Seq with specific antibodies against acetylated histone H3K9.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that pretreatment with TSA can enhance ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage of esophageal cancer cells, which was associated with the altered histone modification of whole genome. TSA has potential implications for clinical use in increasing the anticancer efficacy of radiation.

Aurora kinase inhibitor VX-680 enhances sensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells to cisplatin chemotherapy

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is malignant cancer with a high mortality rate. Cisplatin is one of the most potent chemotherapy agents used in the treatment of ESCC. However, chemoresistance and severe adverse effects of cisplatin become major obstacles to clinical utility. The combination treatment with molecule-targeted drugs and chemotherapy agents is a promising treatment strategy for cancer to improve antineoplastic responses. VX-680 is a potent inhibitor of Aurora kinases. This study was performed to investigate if VX-680 and cisplatin can synergistically inhibit the malignant behavior of ESCC cells. The results obtained from 3-(4,5)-dimethylthiahiazo (-z-y1)-3,5-di- phenytetrazoliumromide assay and combination index analysis demonstrated that the combination of VX-680 and cisplatin synergistically enhanced cytotoxic effects in ESCC cells. 2-(4-Amidinophenyl)-6-indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride staining and western blot analysis suggested that VX-680 increased cisplatin-mediated cell apoptosis. Further analysis revealed that VX-680 combined with cisplatin could attenuate cell migration and angiogenesis confirmed by wound-healing assay and tube formation assay. Subsequently, VX-680 and cisplatin combined treatment significantly promoted cell-cell cohesion, and reduced cell-extracellular matrix interaction, as analyzed by the cell dissociation assay and cell-matrix attachment assay. In addition, the combination of VX-680 and cisplatin markedly decreased the expressions of matrix metalloproteinases-2 (MMP-2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), p-extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase and p-RAC-α serine/threonine-protein kinase compared to VX-680 or cisplatin only treatment. Altogether, these findings strongly suggest that the combination of VX-680 and cisplatin could exert a synergistic antitumor effect in ESCC cells and this combination might represent a promising therapeutic strategy against ESCC.

RNA-Binding Proteins CLK1 and POP7 as Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The abnormality of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) is closely related to the tumorigenesis and development of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and has been an area of interest for research recently. In this study, 162 tumors and 11 normal samples are obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database, among which 218 differentially expressed RBPs are screened. Finally, a prognostic model including seven RBPs (CLK1, DDX39A, EEF2, ELAC1, NKRF, POP7, and SMN1) is established. Further analysis reveals that the overall survival (OS) rate of the high-risk group is lower than that of the low-risk group. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of the training group and testing group is significant (AUCs of 3 years are 0.815 and 0.694, respectively, AUCs of 5 years are 0.737 and 0.725, respectively). In addition, a comprehensive analysis of seven identified RBPs shows that most RBPs are related to OS in patients with ESCC, among which EEF2 and ELCA1 are differentially expressed at the protein level of ESCC and control tissues. CLK1 and POP7 expressions in esophageal cancer tumor samples are undertaken using the tissue microarray, and show that CLK1 mRNA levels are relatively lower, and POP7 mRNA levels are higher compared with non-cancerous esophageal tissues. Survival analysis reveals that a higher expression of CLK1 predicts a significant worse prognosis, and a lower expression of POP7 predicts a worse prognosis in esophageal cancer. These results suggest that CLK1 may promote tumor progression, and POP7 may hinder the development of esophageal cancer. In addition, gene set enrichment analysis reveals that abnormal biological processes related to ribosomes and abnormalities in classic tumor signaling pathways such as TGF-β are important driving forces for the occurrence and development of ESCC. Our results provide new insights into the pathogenesis of ESCC, and seven RBPs have potential application value in the clinical prognosis prediction of ESCC.