Laparoscopic Anatomical Versus Non-anatomical hepatectomy in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A randomised controlled trial

Intersegmental veins between segments 5 and 8 as a landmark along the intersegmental planes during laparoscopic anatomical segmentectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy (LAH) of segments 5 and 8 (LAHSg5/Sg8) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the most challenging procedures due to the difficulty in exposing the main vascular structure. The aim of our study was to investigate the anatomical characteristics of inter-SVs based on the three-dimensional (3D) visualization technology exploring its safety and feasibility during LAHSg5/Sg8. A total of 110 patients who underwent LAHSg5/Sg8 in our center between January 2019 and August 2022 were enrolled and analyzed retrospectively. During the operation, the inter-SVs of the first 10 patients were observed. Subsequently, 100 patients were included based on the previous intraoperative understanding. The anatomical parameters of inter-SVs and the perioperative outcomes were recorded and evaluated. The safety and short-term efficacy of LAHSg5/Sg8 were assessed. All the patients underwent preoperative 3D processing software analysis. Of the included patients, 74.6% had inter-SVs in Sg5/Sg8, which could be classified into three types: trunk type, double branch type and multi branch type, accounting for 35.4%, 22.2% and 17.0%, respectively. The concordance between pre-operation and intra-operation in terms of portal vein territory of Sg5/Sg8 was 82 ± 31%. The inlet point diameter was 3.3 ± 1.0 mm. The distance between the inter-SVs in Sg5/Sg8 and P8, point "B" were 17.7 ± 6.2 mm, 6.1 ± 17 mm, respectively. The confluence of inter-SVs in Sg5/Sg8 at "point B" and below accounted for 10.2%. Preoperative 3D reconstruction and personalized surgical planning based on individual anatomical variations are crucial for successful LAHSg5/Sg8. Inter-SVs between Sg5/Sg8 as a landmark along the ISP during LAHS for HCC may be safe and feasible.

Precision surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma arises in the setting of cirrhosis in most cases, requiring multidisciplinary input to define resectability. In this regard, more precise surgical management considers patient factors and anatomical states, including resection margins, tumour biology, and perioperative therapy. Together with advances in surgical techniques, this integrated approach has resulted in considerable improvements in patient morbidity and oncological outcomes. Despite this, recurrence rates in hepatocellular carcinoma remain high. As the systemic treatment landscape in hepatocellular carcinoma continues to evolve and locoregional options are increasingly used, we review current and future opportunities to individualise the surgical management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Right Intrahepatic Portal Vein Classification Based on Three-Dimensional Visualization With Particular Attention to the Relevance of the Right Anterior and the Right Posterior Portal Vein

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to investigate the branching pattern of the right intrahepatic portal vein, with a particular focus on the third-order portal vein branches, and their clinical implications, utilizing three-dimensional visualization technology. This technology has the potential to assist clinicians in performing hepatectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis on the branching pattern of the third-order portal branch of the right intrahepatic portal vein was conducted in 711 patients, spanning from June 2019 to June 2021, utilizing three-dimensional visualization techniques.

RESULTS

With regard to the anatomy of the right anterior portal vein, the cranio-caudal type was found in 353 patients, the ventro-dorsal type in 171 patients, the trifurcation type in 61 patients, and the quadfurcation type in 9 patients. Additionally, the right posterior portal vein was categorized into three types based on the third-order branches: the bow-shaped type was observed in 294 cases, the bifurcation type in 286 cases, and the trifurcation type in 14 cases. Consequently, the branching pattern of the right intrahepatic portal vein was classified into 12 distinct types and four special types, considering the variations in the number and course of the third-order branches originating from the right anterior and posterior portal veins.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study offer valuable insights into the structure of the right intrahepatic portal vein, enhancing clinicians' rational understanding and contributing to the safe execution of hepatic operative planning and decision-making.

Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic portal territory fluorescence navigation-guided anatomical liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

The clinical effectiveness of classic anatomical resection (CAR) of the liver for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been controversial. Laparoscopic Portal Territory fluorescence navigation-guided anatomical liver resection (LPTAR) has been increasingly applied in clinical practice. However, evidence on the safety and efficacy of LPTAR is lacking.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy from December 2018 to December 2022 was conducted. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to match patients who underwent LPTAR with patients who underwent CAR. Differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and perioperative data were evaluated between the LPTAR and CAR groups. Cox regression models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses, as well as subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 234 patients included in this study, 70 underwent LRTAR, and 164 underwent CAR. After 1:1 PSM, each group contained 59 patients, and perioperative parameters were better in the LPTAR group. Specifically, the LPTAR group had wider resection margins (13.00 cm vs. 11.00 cm, P = 0.023), less blood loss (200 ml vs. 320 ml, P = 0.010), and fewer postoperative complications (33.90% vs. 57.62%, P = 0.016) than did the CAR group. The RFS rates of patients with HCC was also increased by LPTAR. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates of the LPTAR group were significantly higher than those of the CAR group (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Accurate preoperative planning and standardized LPTAR technical criteria prolonged RFS in HCC patients, improved the safety of surgery, and reduced surgical stress.

TRAIL REGISTRATION

The study has been prospective registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/, ChiCTR2400087661).

Establishment of a clinical model based on vessels encapsulating tumour clusters that could efficiently predict recurrence of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy

According to previous studies, vessels encapsulating tumour clusters (VETC) could promote metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a manner independent from epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). However, the prognostic significance of VETC among patients undergoing curative hepatectomy has not been fully explored. This study was performed to assess the prognostic significance of VETC among patients with HCC undergoing curative hepatectomy. A total of 81 patients were included in this study. A predictive model based on VETC was established, then this model was compared with the American Joint Committee on Cancer, Tumor Node Metastasis (AJCC TNM) stage and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system. It was revealed by multivariate Cox regression analysis that a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) [p=0.013, hazard ratio (HR)=6.175, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.468-25.977], number of tumours (p<0.001, HR=4.119, 95% CI 1.886-8.995) and VETC positivity (p=0.010, HR=2.440, 95% CI 1.235-4.821) were independent predictive factors for disease-free survival (DFS). Additionally, by Kaplan-Meier analysis, we revealed that VETC positivity was associated with worse DFS (p=0.018). The clinical predictive model combining the NLR, number of tumours, and VETC was compared with AJCC TNM stage and BCLC classification system by performing time-dependent receiver operating curve (td-ROC) analysis, revealing that the clinical predictive model was superior to AJCC TNM stage and BCLC system at different timepoints. Additionally, we demonstrated that the clinical model could well predict DFS by plotting calibration curves. VETC could be utilised as an efficient prognostic factor for HCC and the clinical predictive model combining the NLR, number of tumours, and VETC was superior to AJCC TNM stage and BCLC system in predicting cancer recurrence.

Laennec approach for anatomical liver resection assisted by laparoscopy or robotics: a multicenter cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Laennec's capsule serves as a critical anatomical landmark in liver resection. Despite its potential, a lack of large-scale prospective studies limits the widespread use of the Laennec approach for minimally invasive hepatectomy. This multicenter cohort study aimed to compare the outcomes of the traditional and Laennec approaches in minimally invasive anatomical hepatectomy across multiple centers in China.

METHODS

A total of 445 patients from 11 centers were included, with 339 undergoing the Laennec approach and 106 receiving the traditional approach. Intraoperative parameters such as the duration of hepatic pedicle isolation, hepatic vein exposure, parenchymal transection, and liver mobilization were analyzed. Postoperative outcomes, including recurrence-free survival and R0 resection rates, were also assessed. Additionally, a series of subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the Laennec approach.

RESULTS

The Laennec approach demonstrated notable intraoperative advantages, including reduced durations for hepatic pedicle isolation, liver mobilization, hepatic vein exposure, and parenchymal transection. Robotic-assisted procedures, in particular, showed superior outcomes when compared with laparoscopic platform. The Laennec approach proved highly effective across various liver diseases, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma, hemangioma, and hepatolithiasis. The Laennec gap, a distinct gap between the liver parenchyma and surrounding vasculature, played a key role in identifying candidates for the Laennec approach. Subgroup analysis revealed that although the Laennec approach provides significant intraoperative benefits, these advantages do not seem not to translate into substantial postoperative improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

The Laennec approach offers clear intraoperative advantages over the traditional approach when utilizing laparoscopic or robotic systems. These findings support the Laennec approach as a standardized technique for anatomical liver resection.

Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy: A Retrospective Propensity Score-matched Study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this investigation was to ascertain the effectiveness of an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) administered to patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma who were subjected to laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 172 patients, comparing 2 groups: one comprising 90 individuals who were administered intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) simultaneously with ESPB, and a second group of 82 patients who received PCA monotherapy. To equilibrate covariates across the groups, propensity score matching was executed, yielding 25 matched pairs as a result.

RESULTS

At 12 and 24 hours postprocedure, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, both at rest and during movement, were significantly reduced in the group receiving PCA in conjunction with ESPB. Furthermore, this group exhibited a substantially lower incidence of rescue analgesia utilization, a significantly abbreviated duration to ambulation, a reduced hospitalization period, and a significantly elevated level of patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

ESPB serves as an efficacious ancillary analgesic for laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy, offering superior pain management and recuperation relative to the administration of intravenous analgesia in isolation. The implementation of ESPB as an adjunct to PCA in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy proved to be both safe and efficacious. Notably, PCA augmented with ESPB demonstrated greater efficacy in mitigating postoperative pain compared with PCA as a standalone therapy.

Unraveling the therapeutic potential of Calculus Bovis in liver cancer: A novel step for targeted cancer treatment

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths globally, and effective treatments are urgently needed. The present study aimed to investigate the inhibitory effect of Calculus Bovis (CB) on liver cancer and the underlying mechanisms. CB inhibited M2 tumor-associated macrophage polarization and modulated the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, thereby suppressing the proliferation of liver cancer cells. The inhibitory effect on liver cancer growth was confirmed by both in vivo and in vitro experiments (detailed by Huang et al). The present study provides a theoretical basis for the application of CB for the treatment of liver cancer, providing new avenues for liver cancer treatment.

Significance of anatomical resection and wide surgical margin for HCC patients with MVI undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy: A multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of surgical resection margin and hepatic resection type on prognosis and compare their prognostic significance on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with or without microvascular invasion (MVI) who underwent laparoscopic liver resection (LLR).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 320 patients with HCC who underwent LLR. According to the grading of MVI, patients were classified as M0, M1 and M2. Patients were divided into the anatomical resection (AR) and nonanatomical resection (NAR) groups according to the hepatic resection type. Survival and Cox regression analyses were performed to explore the effects of AR and NAR, wide and narrow resection margin on overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR).

RESULTS

In the whole cohort, narrow resection margin was an independent risk factor for OS and TTR, whereas NAR was not. Subgroup analysis showed that narrow resection margin and NAR were both independent risk factors for OS and TTR in HCC patients with MVI. The 5-year OS and TTR rates of the two groups (NAR-wide resection margin and AR-narrow resection margin) with M1 were 85.3 % versus 62 % and 34.4 % versus 60.2 %. Similarly, the 5-year OS and TTR rates of the two groups (NAR-wide resection margin and AR-narrow resection margin) with M2 were 80.2 % versus 47.9 % and 30.8 % versus 64.8 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical hepatectomy and wide resection margin were independent protective factors for HCC patients with MVI receiving LLR. Nonetheless, wide resection margin had a greater impact on prognosis than anatomical hepatectomy.

Anatomic versus nonanatomic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The value of anatomic resection (AR) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains controversial. This study compares the perioperative safety and long-term outcomes of AR versus nonanatomic resection (NAR) in ICC patients.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), and Wanfang database for prospective or retrospective studies comparing the efficacy of AR and NAR in, ICC published to 1 June 2024. Meta-analyses were performed on surgical factors, perioperative outcomes, and long-term prognosis for both the entire cohort and the propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort. The primary outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Seven studies, including 1801 ICC patients, were analyzed. In both the entire and the PSM cohort, the AR group demonstrated superior OS (HR=0.71, 95% CI=0.57-0.88, P=0.002 and HR=0.70, 95% CI=0.59-0.83, P<0.0001, respectively) and DFS (HR=0.75, 95% CI=0.62-0.91, P=0.004 and HR=0.68, 95% CI=0.58-0.79, P<0.00001, respectively) compared to the NAR group. AR significantly improves 1-year, 3-year, 5-year DFS, and 5-year OS(all P<0.05). In the PSM cohort, AR and NAR groups showed comparable blood loss, operative times, overall complications, and major complications (all P>0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that among patients with tumor >5 cm, AR achieved better OS and DFS, whereas patients with tumors ≤5 cm did not experience survival benefits from AR.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that AR, compared to NAR, can improve OS and DFS without increasing perioperative risks, particularly in ICC patients with tumors larger than 5 cm.

Novel techniques of liver segmental and subsegmental pedicle anatomy from segment 1 to segment 8

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic anatomical liver resection has become more challenging because some subsegmental Glissonean pedicles are hard to dissect. Here, we introduce how to dissect every (sub) segmental Glissonean pedicle from the first porta hepatis and perform standardized (sub) segmentectomy [from segment 1 (S1) to S8].

AIM

To summarize our methods of laparoscopic anatomical segmental and subsegmental liver resection.

METHODS

The Glisson sheath and liver capsule were separated along the Laennec membrane. The Glissonean pedicle could be isolated and transected with little or no parenchymal damage through this extra-Glissonean dissection approach. The basin of the (sub) segment was determined by the ischemia demarcation line or indocyanine green staining. The hepatic vein or intersegmental vein was also used to guide the plane of parenchymal transection.

RESULTS

All segmental or subsegmental pedicles or even the pedicle of the cone unit could be dissected along the Laennec membrane using our novel technique through the first porta hepatis. The dorsal branches of S8, the branches of S4a and the paracaval portion branches (b/c vein) of the caudate lobe were the most difficult to dissect.

CONCLUSION

The novel techniques of liver segmental and subsegmental pedicle anatomy is feasible for laparoscopic liver resection and can help accurately guide (sub) segmentectomy from S1 to S8.

Evolution of Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Change Point Analysis of Textbook Outcome over Twenty Years

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to comprehensively analyze the evolution in textbook outcome (TO) achievement after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over two decades at a single tertiary referral center. Materials and Methods: All consecutive liver resections for HCC at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2003 to 2022 were analyzed. The included 1334 patients were divided into four groups by time intervals identified through change point analysis. TO was defined as no intraoperative transfusions, positive margins, major complications, 30-day readmission or mortality, and prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS). Results: Multiple change point analysis identified three change points (2006, 2012, 2017), and patients were divided into four groups. More recent time interval groups were associated with older age (59 vs. 59 vs. 61 vs. 63 years, p < 0.0001) and more comorbidities. Minimally invasive procedures were increasingly performed (open/laparoscopic/robotic 37.0%/63.0%/0%) vs. 43.8%/56.2%/0% vs. 17.1%/82.4%/0.5% vs. 22.9%/75.9%/1.2%, p < 0.0001). TO achievement improved over time (1.9% vs. 18.5% vs. 47.7% vs. 62.5%, p < 0.0001), and LOS was the greatest limiting factor. Conclusions: TO after liver resection improved with advances in minimally invasive techniques and parenchymal sparing procedures, even in older patients with more comorbidities and advanced tumors.

Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Anatomical versus Non-Anatomical Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes between laparoscopic anatomical liver resection (LAR) and laparoscopic non-anatomical liver resection (LNAR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

In this single-center retrospective cohort study, 1773 patients, from January 2009 to December 2017, were assessed for inclusion. After exclusions, 661 patients were included: 304 patients received LAR and 357 patients received LNAR. Propensity score matching (PSM) with 1:1 ratio was used to eliminate the selection bias between LAR and LNAR groups. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used for survival analysis.

Results

After PSM, 250 patients were in LAR or LNAR group, respectively. The overall survival (OS) had no significant difference between LAR and LNAR by Kaplan-Meier analysis. While, LAR had better disease-free survival (DFS) compared with LNAR (Log-rank P=0.035). The cumulative 5-year DFS rates were 48% for LAR, and 38% for LNAR. By Cox analysis, LAR was an independent risk factor of DFS (HR=1.308, P=0.030). In subgroup analysis for tumor size ≤ 5 cm, 207 patients were in LAR or LNAR subgroup after PSM. LAR had better DFS compared with LNAR (Log-rank P=0.033). LAR was an independent risk factor of DFS (HR=1.333, P=0.036). The cumulative 5-year DFS rates were 50% for LAR, and 39% for LNAR. In another subgroup analysis for tumor size > 5 cm, 43 patients were in LAR or LNAR subgroup after PSM. The DFS had no significant difference between LAR and LNAR (Log-rank P=0.912).

Conclusion

LAR is preferred for HCC patients with tumor size ≤5cm compared with LNAR because of the better DFS. For patients with tumor size >5cm, LAR and LNAR might be alternative procedures with comparable long-term outcomes.

Grading severity of MVI impacts long-term outcomes after laparoscopic liver resection for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study

PURPOSE

To examine the relationship between microvascular invasion (MVI) grading severity and long-term outcomes in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR).

METHODS

Patients who had LLR for early-stage HCC were enrolled. According to the grading severity of MVI, patients were classified into M0, M1 and M2. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) among the groups were compared. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors of OS and RFS.

RESULTS

Among 233 patients, MVI grading as M0, M1, and M2 accounts for 122 (52.4 ​%), 84 (36 ​%), and 27 (11.6 ​%) patients, respectively. The median OS and RFS in patients with M0, M1, and M2 were 84.9, 40.1, and 25.2 months; and 76.9, 27.0, and 18.8 months, respectively. Multivariable analyses identified both M1 and M2 to be independent risk factors for OS and RFS.

CONCLUSION

Grading severity of MVI was independently associated with RFS and OS after LLR for early-stage HCC. Patients with MVI, especially those with M2, should receive stringent recurrence surveillance and active adjuvant therapy.

Use of indocyanine green-human serum albumin complexes in fluorescence image-guided laparoscopic anatomical liver resection: a case series study (with video)

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of near-infrared fluorescence-guided laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy (LAH) using a novel indocyanine green (ICG)-human serum albumin complex (HSA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

Clinical data of hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent ICG-HSA fluorescence-guided LAH at our center from January 2024 to April 2024 were prospectively collected and analyzed. Ultraviolet absorption spectroscopy was used to test the absorption and stability of ICG-HSA complex solutions under different conditions. After determining the optimal ratio, the complex was administered intravenously during surgery to perform negative staining via Glissonean pedicle isolation. LAH was performed along the fluorescence-demarcated boundaries.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included (24 men; mean age, 54.61 ± 13.54 years). The median maximum tumor diameter was 2.80 (interquartile range [IQR], 2.00-4.00) cm. S8 segmentectomy (22.6%) and right posterior segmentectomy (19.4%) were the most common resections performed. Successful fluorescence negative staining was achieved in all patients using ICG and HSA at a 1:6 molar ratio at room temperature. Mean operation time was 297.58 ± 85.53 min, Median intraoperative blood loss was 100.0 mL (IQR, 50.0-200.0). The median surgical margin distance was 0.90 cm (IQR, 0.40-1.50). The postoperative complication rate was 45.2% (35.5% Clavien-Dindo grade I and 9.7% grade II). The median length of hospital stay was 5.0 days (IQR, 4.0-5.0).

CONCLUSION

ICG-HSA-assisted LAH is safe and feasible. Compared with free ICG, the novel ICG-HSA complex exhibits better optical properties and in vivo stability, which can improve the accuracy of intraoperative liver segment localization and optimize the anatomical dissection plane. It has the potential to become an ideal fluorescent imaging agent for anatomical hepatectomy.

Efficiency and safety of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy: A study of intrathecal vs extrathecal Glissonean pedicle techniques

BACKGROUND

Selective hemihepatic vascular occlusion is utilized in both right and left hemihepatectomies to preserve blood supply to the intact lobe, maintain hemodynamic stability, and mitigate surgical risks. While this technique encompasses both intrathecal and extrathecal Glissonean pedicle transection methods, there is a lack of systematic comparative reports on these two approaches.

AIM

To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy in our hospital to explore the feasibility, safety, and short- and long-term efficacy of extrathecal and intrathecal Glissonean pedicle transection methods in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed to analyze the clinical data of 49 HCC patients who underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy from January 2019 to December 2022 in our hospital. These patients were divided into extrathecal Glissonean pedicle transection (EGP) group (n = 24) and intrathecal Glissonean pedicle transection (IGP) group (n = 25) according to the different approaches used for selective hemihepatic vascular occlusion. The perioperative indicators, liver function indexes, complications, and follow-up findings were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

The surgeries were smooth in both groups, and no perioperative death was noted. The hepatic pedicle transection time and the operation time were (16.1 ± 2.3) minutes and (129.6 ± 19.0) minutes, respectively, in the EGP group, which were significantly shorter than those in the IGP group [(25.5 ± 2.4) minutes and (184.8 ± 26.0) minutes, respectively], both P < 0.01. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, time to anal exhaust, hospital stay, drain indwelling time, and postoperative liver function between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications showed no significant difference [16.67% (4/24) vs 16.0% (4/25), P > 0.05). All the 49 HCC patients were followed up after surgery (range: 11.2-53.3 months; median: 36.4 months). The overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate were not significantly different (both P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both extrathecal and intrathecal Glissonean pedicle approaches are effective and safe hepatic inflow occlusion techniques in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy for HCC. However, the extrathecal approach simplifies the hepatic pedicle transection, shortens the operation time, and increases the surgical efficiency, making it a more feasible technique.

Pay attention to the application of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging technology in laparoscopic liver cancer resection

Traditional laparoscopic liver cancer resection faces challenges, such as difficulties in tumor localization and accurate marking of liver segments, as well as the inability to provide real-time intraoperative navigation. This approach falls short of meeting the demands for precise and anatomical liver resection. The introduction of fluorescence imaging technology, particularly indocyanine green, has demonstrated significant advantages in visualizing bile ducts, tumor localization, segment staining, microscopic lesion display, margin examination, and lymph node visualization. This technology addresses the inherent limitations of traditional laparoscopy, which lacks direct tactile feedback, and is increasingly becoming the standard in laparoscopic procedures. Guided by fluorescence imaging technology, laparoscopic liver cancer resection is poised to become the predominant technique for liver tumor removal, enhancing the accuracy, safety and efficiency of the procedure.

Current Trends and Advancements in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a significant global health burden with a high mortality rate. Over the past 40 years, significant progress has been achieved in the prevention and management of HCC.

SUMMARY

Hepatitis B vaccination programs, the development of direct acting antiviral drugs for Hepatitis C, and effective surveillance strategies provide a profound basis for the prevention of HCC. Advanced surgery and liver transplantation along with local ablation techniques potentially offer cure for the disease. Also, just recently, the introduction of immunotherapy opened a new chapter in systemic treatment. Finally, the introduction of the BCLC classification system for HCC, clearly defining patient groups and assigning reasonable treatment options, has standardized treatment and become the basis of almost all clinical trials for HCC. With this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of HCC management and also touch on current challenges.

KEY MESSAGE

A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach is crucial for effective HCC management. Continued research and clinical trials are imperative to further enhance treatment options and will ultimately reduce the global burden of this devastating disease.

Laparoscopic-assisted microwave ablation in treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: safety and efficacy in comparison with laparoscopic hepatectomy

Laparoscopic-assisted microwave ablation (LAMWA), as one of the locoregional therapies, has been employed to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of LAMWA and laparoscopic hepatectomy in the treatment of small HCC.This study included 140 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 68 patients received LAMWA and 72 patients underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy. The perioperative condition, liver function recovery, the alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level, morbidities, hospitalization time, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence rate between the two groups were compared. The rate of complete elimination of tumor tissue was 100% and the AFP level was returned to normal within 3 months after surgery in both groups (P > 0.05). The mean alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) peak in the LAMWA group was lower than that in the laparoscopic hepatectomy group (259.51 ± 188.75 VS 388.9 ± 173.65, P = 0.000) and (267.34 ± 190.65 VS 393.1 ± 185.67, P = 0.000), respectively. The mean operation time in the LAMWA group was shorter than that in the laparoscopic hepatectomy group (89 ± 31 min VS 259 ± 48 min, P = 0.000). The blood loss in the LAMWA group was less than that in the laparoscopic hepatectomy group (58.4 ± 64.0 ml VS 213.0 ± 108.2 ml, P = 0.000). Compared with the laparoscopic hepatectomy group, patients in the LAMWA group had lower mean hospital stay (4.8 ± 1.2d VS 11.5 ± 2.9d, P = 0.000). The morbidities of the LAMWA group and the hepatectomy group were 14.7%(10/68) and 34.7%(25/72), respectively (P = 0.006). The one-, three-, and five-year OS rates were 88.2%, 69.9%, 45.6% for the LAMWA group and 86.1%, 72.9%, 51.4% for the laparoscopic hepatectomy group (P = 0.693). The corresponding DFS rates for the two groups were 76.3%, 48.1%, 27.9% and 73.2%, 56.7%, 32.0% (P = 0.958). Laparoscopic-assisted microwave ablation is a safe and effective therapeutic option for selected small HCC.

Impact of three-dimensional reconstruction visualization technology on short-term and long-term outcomes after hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity-score-matched and inverse probability of treatment-weighted multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional reconstruction visualization technology (3D-RVT) is an important tool in the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing liver resection. However, it is not clear whether this technique can improve short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with two-dimensional (2D) imaging.

METHOD

A total of 3402 patients from five centers were consecutively enrolled from January 2016 to December 2020, and grouped based on the use of 3D-RVT or 2D imaging for preoperative assessment. Baseline characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM, 1:1) and stabilized inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) to reduce potential selection bias. The perioperative outcomes, long-term overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the two groups. Cox-regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors associated with RFS.

RESULTS

A total of 1681 patients underwent 3D-RVT assessment before hepatectomy (3D group), while 1721 patients used 2D assessment (2D group). The PSM cohort included 892 patient pairs. In the IPTW cohort, there were 1608.3 patients in the 3D group and 1777.9 patients in the 2D group. In both cohorts, the 3D group had shorter operation times, lower morbidity and liver failure rates, as well as shorter postoperative hospital stays. The 3D group had more margins ≥10 mm and better RFS than the 2D group. The presence of tumors with a diameter ≥5 cm, intraoperative blood transfusion and multiple tumors were identified as independent risk factors for RFS, while 3D assessment and anatomical resection were independent protective factors.

CONCLUSION

In this multicenter study, perioperative outcomes and RFS of HCC patients following 3D-RVT assessment were significantly different from those following 2D imaging assessment. Thus, 3D-RVT may be a feasible alternative assessment method before hepatectomy for these patients.

Intrahepatic Glisson Intrathecal Dissection via a Hepatic Parenchymal Transection-First Approach for Laparoscopic Anatomical Hemihepatectomy in Patients with Left/Right Glisson Pedicle Involvement

Background: Because of lack of an appropriate surgical approach, laparoscopic surgery in patients with left/right Glisson pedicle involvement is still rarely conducted. This study aimed to discusses the methods of intrahepatic Glisson intrathecal dissection via a hepatic parenchymal transection-first approach for laparoscopic hemihepatectomy in patients with left/right Glisson pedicle involvement. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 21 patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy in the Second Affiliated Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) from March 2021 to May 2022. Results: The mean age of the patients was 53.1 ± 11.6 years; mean operation time, 191.9 ± 22.3 minutes; median intraoperative blood loss, 205 mL (160-300 mL); and median length of hospital stay, 8 days (7-9 days). None of the patients underwent conversion to open procedure. Thirteen patients had pathologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal tumor thrombi (PVTT), and 8 was confirmed hepatolithiasis. Intraoperative frozen pathology and final pathology showed tumor free surgical margins in HCC with PVTT patients. After conservative treatment, all the complications such as postoperative liver section effusion, pleural effusion, pneumonia, intra-abdomen bleeding, and bile leak were cured. During outpatient follow-up examination, no other abnormality was detected. All HCC with PVTT patients were treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor after the operation and survived tumor-free. Conclusions: Proposed here is a more safe and feasible method of laparoscopic hemihepatectomy in patients with left/right Glisson pedicle involvement, but many problems still needs further exploration.

What Is the Role of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery in Treating Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Cirrhosis?

Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) has been slowly introduced in the past two decades and today represents a major weapon in the fight against HCC, for several reasons. This narrative review conveys the major emerging concepts in the field. The rise in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)-related HCC means that patients with significant cardiovascular risk will benefit more profoundly from MILS. The advent of efficacious therapy is leading to conversion from non-resectable to resectable cases, and therefore more patients will be able to undergo MILS. In fact, resection outcomes with MILS are superior compared to open surgery both in the short and long term. Furthermore, indications to surgery may be further expanded by its use in Child B7 patients and by the use of laparoscopic ablation, a curative technique, instead of trans-arterial approaches in cases not amenable to radiofrequency. Therefore, in a promising new approach, multi-parametric treatment hierarchy, MILS is hierarchically superior to open surgery and comes second only to liver transplantation.

Effect of anatomical liver resection on early postoperative recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma assessed based on a nomogram: a single-center study in China

Introduction

We aimed to investigate risk factors for early postoperative recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and determine the effect of surgical methods on early recurrence to facilitate predicting the risk of early postoperative recurrence in such patients and the selection of appropriate treatment methods.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data concerning 428 patients with HCC who had undergone radical surgery at Mianyang Central Hospital between January 2015 and August 2022. Relevant routine preoperative auxiliary examinations and regular postoperative telephone or outpatient follow-ups were performed to identify early postoperative recurrence. Risk factors were screened, and predictive models were constructed, including patients' preoperative ancillary tests, intra- and postoperative complications, and pathology tests in relation to early recurrence. The risk of recurrence was estimated for each patient based on a prediction model, and patients were categorized into low- and high-risk recurrence groups. The effect of anatomical liver resection (AR) on early postoperative recurrence in patients with HCC in the two groups was assessed using survival analysis.

Results

In total, 353 study patients were included. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis findings suggested that tumor diameter (≥5/<5 cm, odds ratio [OR] 2.357, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.368-4.059; P = 0.002), alpha fetoprotein (≥400/<400 ng/L, OR 2.525, 95% CI 1.334-4.780; P = 0.004), tumor number (≥2/<2, OR 2.213, 95% CI 1.147-4.270; P = 0.018), microvascular invasion (positive/negative, OR 3.230, 95% CI 1.880-5.551; P < 0.001), vascular invasion (positive/negative, OR 4.472, 95% CI 1.395-14.332; P = 0.012), and alkaline phosphatase level (>125/≤125 U/L, OR 2.202, 95% CI 1.162-4.173; P = 0.016) were risk factors for early recurrence following radical HCC surgery. Model validation and evaluation showed that the area under the curve was 0.813. Hosmer-Lemeshow test results (X 2 = 1.225, P = 0.996 > 0.05), results from bootstrap self-replicated sampling of 1,000 samples, and decision curve analysis showed that the model also discriminated well, with potentially good clinical utility. Using this model, patients were stratified into low- and high-risk recurrence groups. One-year disease-free survival was compared between the two groups with different surgical approaches. Both groups benefited from AR in terms of prevention of early postoperative recurrence, with AR benefits being more pronounced and intraoperative bleeding less likely in the high-risk recurrence group.

Discussion

With appropriate surgical techniques and with tumors being realistically amenable to R0 resection, AR is a potentially useful surgical procedure for preventing early recurrence after radical surgery in patients with HCC.

From Conversion to Resection for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of the Latest Strategies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in China, accounting for the majority of primary liver cancer cases. Liver resection is the preferred curative method for early-stage HCC. However, up to 80-85% of patients have already missed the opportunity of radical surgery due to tumor advances at the time of consultation. Conversion therapies are a series of medications and treatments for initially inoperable patients. For early-stage unresectable HCC (uHCC) patients, conversion therapies are designed to meet surgical requirements by increasing the volume of the residual liver. Meanwhile, for advanced cases, conversion therapies strive for tumor shrinkage and down-staging, creating the opportunity for liver resection or liver transplantation. This review summarizes the latest advances in conversion therapies and highlights their potential for improving the survival benefit of patients with uHCC.

The Comparison of Surgical Margins and Type of Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Microvascular Invasion

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of surgical margin and hepatic resection on prognosis and compare their importance on prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

The clinical data of 906 patients with HCC who underwent hepatic resection in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2015 were collected retrospectively. All patients were divided into anatomical resection (AR) (n = 234) and nonanatomical resection (NAR) group (n = 672) according to type of hepatic resection. The effects of AR and NAR and wide and narrow margins on overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR) were analyzed.

RESULTS

In all patients, narrow margin (1.560, 1.278-1.904; 1.387, 1.174-1.639) is an independent risk factor for OS and TTR, and NAR is not. Subgroup analysis showed that narrow margins (2.307, 1.699-3.132; 1.884, 1.439-2.468), and NAR (1.481, 1.047-2.095; 1.372, 1.012-1.860) are independent risk factors for OS and TTR in patients with microvascular invasion (MVI)-positive. Further analysis showed that for patients with MVI-positive HCC, NAR with wide margins was a protective factor for OS and TTR compared to AR with narrow margins (0.618, 0.396-0.965; 0.662, 0.448-0.978). The 1, 3, and 5 years OS and TTR rate of the two group were 81%, 49%, 29% versus 89%, 64%, 49% (P = .008) and 42%, 79%, 89% versus 32%, 58%, 74% (P = .024), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with MVI-positive HCC, AR and wide margins were protective factors for prognosis. However, wide margins are more important than AR on prognosis. In the clinical setting, if the wide margins and AR cannot be ensured at the same time, the wide margins should be ensured first.

Adjuvant therapy with Jianpi Huayu decoction improves overall and recurrence-free survival after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective propensity score-matching study

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients experience high rates of recurrence following hepatectomy. Many herbal preparations used in traditional Chinese medicine have been shown to improve the postoperative condition of cancer patients. This retrospective study examined the efficacy and safety of Jianpi Huayu decoction (JPHYD) as adjuvant therapy for HCC following hepatectomy. HCC patients received postoperative management according to Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations, either alone (Control group) or in addition to daily JPHYD (1 week in hospital and 3 months after release). To reduce selection bias, we performed 1:1 propensity score matching between the Control and JPHYD groups. The main endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and adverse event frequency. A total of 207 patients meeting inclusion criteria were enrolled, 127 in the Control group and 80 in the JPHYD group. Patients were then propensity score-matched, yielding each group of 80. Recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in the JPHYD group than in the Control group at 1 year (67.9% vs. 38.1%), 2 years (39.1% vs. 26.2%), and 3 years (31.3% vs. 26.2%) following hepatectomy (HR 0.5666 [95%CI, 0.3655 to 0.8784]; p = 0.0066). Additionally, OS was significantly higher in the JPHYD group than the Control group at 1 year (94.3% vs. 81.9%), 2 years (76.4% vs. 58.8%), and 3 years (66.3% vs. 51.4%) following hepatectomy (HR 0.5199 [95%CI, 0.2849 to 0.9490]; p = 0.027). Adverse events frequencies did not differ between the two groups. In conclusion, JPHYD can safely improve RFS and OS following hepatectomy for HCC.

Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for early-stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matching and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis

BACKGROUND

Radical resection is still the most cost-effectiveness curative strategy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), but it remains controversial on the survival benefit of anatomic resection (AR). In this study, we sought to compare the oncologic outcomes between AR versus non-AR (NAR) as the primary treatment for early-stage ICC patients.

METHODS

Data of ICC patients who underwent hepatectomy and staged at AJCC I were retrospectively collected from 12 hepatobiliary centers in China between Dec 2012 and Dec 2015. Propensity score matching (PSM) and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis were performed to minimize the effect of potential confounders, and the perioperative and long-term outcomes between AR and NAR groups were compared.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-eight ICC patients staged at AJCC I were eligible for this study, including 126 patients receiving AR and 152 patients receiving NAR. Compared to the NAR group, the AR group experienced more intraoperative blood loss before and after PSM or stabilized IPTW (all P > 0.05); AR group also experienced more intraoperative transfusion after stabilized IPTW (P > 0.05). In terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), no significant differences were observed between the two groups before and after PSM or stabilized IPTW (all P > 0.05). Multivariable Cox regression analyses found that AR was not an independent prognostic factor for either DFS or OS (all P > 0.05). Further analysis also showed that the survival benefit of AR was not found in any subgroup stratified by Child-Pugh grade (A or B), cirrhosis (presence or absence), tumor diameter (≤ 5 cm or > 5 cm) and pathological type (mass-forming or non-mass-forming) with all P > 0.05.

CONCLUSION

Surgical approach does not influence the prognosis of patients with stage I primary ICC, and NAR might be acceptable and oncological safety.

Effect of anatomical liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite retrospective studies comparing anatomical liver resection (AR) and non-anatomical liver resection (NAR), the efficacy and benefits of AR for hepatocellular carcinoma remain unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors systemically reviewed MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for propensity score matched cohort studies that compared AR and NAR for hepatocellular carcinoma. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes were recurrence patterns and perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 22 propensity score matched studies (AR, n =2,496; NAR, n =2590) were included. AR including systemic segmentectomy was superior to NAR regarding the 3-year and 5-year OS. AR showed significantly better 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year RFS than NAR, with low local and multiple intrahepatic recurrence rates. In the subgroup analyses of tumour diameter less than or equal to 5 cm and tumours with microscopic spread, the RFS in the AR group was significantly better than that in the NAR group. Patients with cirrhotic liver in the AR group showed comparable 3-year and 5-year RFS with the NAR group. Postoperative overall complications were comparable between AR and NAR.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that AR showed better OS and RFS with a low local and multiple intra-hepatic recurrence rate than NAR, especially in patients with tumour diameter less than or equal to 5 cm and non-cirrhotic liver.

Resection Margin Width Does Not Influence the Prognosis of Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Anatomic Resection: A Real-World Study from China

PURPOSE

The influence of resection margin (RM) width on the prognosis of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following anatomical resection (AR) has yet to be determined. Therefore, we conducted a real-world study to identify the optimal RM width and assess its impact on the outcomes of solitary HCC patients undergoing AR.

METHODS

The data pertaining to patients diagnosed with solitary HCC who underwent AR between December 2012 and December 2015 were retrospectively collected. The optimal cutoff value for the width of the RM was determined using X-tile software. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to compare the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the narrow and wide RM groups. Additionally, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize potential bias in the data.

RESULTS

Of the 1033 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 293 (28.4%) were categorized into the narrow RM group (≤4 mm) and 740 (71.6%) into the wide RM group (> 4mm). Before and after PSM, there were no significant differences in OS and DFS between the two groups (before PSM: OS, HR=0.78, P=0.071; DFS, HR=0.95, P=0.620; after PSM: OS, HR=0.77, P=0.150; DFS, HR=0.90, P=0.470). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that RM width was not an independent risk factor for DFS and OS both before and after PSM (all P>0.05). However, subgroup analyses revealed that patients with ALBI grade 1, absence of cirrhosis, and AJCC stage II significantly benefited from wide RM in OS (all P< 0.05). Similarly, patients without HBV infection and absence of cirrhosis also exhibited significant benefits from wide RM in DFS (both P< 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients with solitary HCC undergoing AR, the width of the RM does not appear to have a significant impact on their prognosis. However, in certain selected patients, a wider RM may confer benefits.

Survival Benefits From Adjuvant Lenvatinib for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Microvascular Invasion After Curative Hepatectomy

Background

The long-term prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgery remains far from satisfactory, especially in patients with microvascular invasion (MVI). This study aimed to evaluate the potential survival benefit from adjuvant lenvatinib for patients with HCC and MVI.

Methods

Patients with HCC after curative hepatectomy were reviewed. All patients were divided into 2 groups according to adjuvant lenvatinib. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce selection bias and make the results more robust. Survival curves are shown by the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis and compared by the Log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the independent risk factors.

Results

Of 179 patients enrolled in this study, 43 (24%) patients received adjuvant lenvatinib. After PSM analysis, 31 pairs of patients were enrolled for further analysis. Survival analysis before and after PSM analysis showed a better prognosis in the adjuvant lenvatinib group (all P < .05). The adverse events associated with oral lenvatinib were acceptable. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that adjuvant lenvatinib was an independent protective factor for improving overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.455, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.249-0.831, P = .001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 0.523, 95% CI = 0.308-0.886, P = .016).

Conclusions

Postoperative adjuvant targeted therapy can improve the long-term prognosis of patients with HCC and MVI. Therefore, in clinical practice, oral lenvatinib should be recommended for patients with HCC and MVI to decrease tumor recurrence and improve long-term survival.

Minimally Invasive Anatomic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using the Extrahepatic Glissonian Approach: Surgical Techniques and Comparison of Outcomes with the Open Approach and between the Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches

Surgical techniques and outcomes of minimally invasive anatomic liver resection (AR) using the extrahepatic Glissonian approach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are undefined. In 327 HCC cases undergoing 185 open (OAR) and 142 minimally invasive (MIAR; 102 laparoscopic and 40 robotic) ARs, perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between the approaches, using propensity score matching. After matching (91:91), compared to OAR, MIAR was significantly associated with longer operative time (643 vs. 579 min, p = 0.028); less blood loss (274 vs. 955 g, p < 0.0001); a lower transfusion rate (17.6% vs. 47.3%, p < 0.0001); lower rates of major 90-day morbidity (4.4% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.0008), bile leak or collection (1.1% vs. 11.0%, p = 0.005), and 90-day mortality (0% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.043); and shorter hospital stay (15 vs. 29 days, p < 0.0001). On the other hand, laparoscopic and robotic AR cohorts after matching (31:31) had comparable perioperative outcomes. Overall and recurrence-free survivals after AR for newly developed HCC were comparable between OAR and MIAR, with potentially improved survivals in MIAR. The survivals were comparable between laparoscopic and robotic AR. MIAR was technically standardized using the extrahepatic Glissonian approach. MIAR was safe, feasible, and oncologically acceptable and would be the first choice of AR in selected HCC patients.

Survival benefit of adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after anatomical hepatectomy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Although anatomical hepatectomy (AH) is widely used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the prognosis is still unsatisfactory. The present study aimed to evaluate the survival benefit of adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with HCC after AH.

METHODS

A total of 832 patients were stratified into with adjuvant TACE (443, 53.2%) and without adjuvant TACE group (389, 46.8%) AH. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control for confounding factors, and multivariable Cox regression was performed to determine the independent risk factors.

RESULTS

After PSM, the results showed that the adjuvant TACE group had better overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Among the patients with tumor recurrence, adjuvant TACE was associated with a high rate of early-stage tumor at recurrence, a lower recurrence rate around the frontal margin and extrahepatic metastases, and a higher rate of receiving curative treatment. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that adjuvant TACE was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 0.673, P = 0.001) and RFS (HR 0.650, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HCC after AH can benefit from postoperative adjuvant TACE. Therefore, adjuvant TACE should be considered for patients with a high risk of recurrence.

Counterclockwise modular laparoscopic anatomical mesohepatectomy using combined glissonean pedicle (Takasaki approach) and hepatic vein-guided approaches

Background

Although laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy (LAH) is widely adopted today, laparoscopic anatomic mesohepatectomy (LAMH) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains technically challenging.

Methods

In this study, 6 patients suffering from solitary liver tumors located in the middle lobe of the liver underwent counterclockwise modular LAMH using combined Glissonean pedicle (Takasaki approach) and hepatic vein-guided approaches. In this process, the Glissonean pedicle approach (Takasaki approach) was first used to transect the liver pedicles of segment right anterior (G58) and segment 4 (G4). Second, the hepatic vein-guided approach was performed along the umbilical fissure vein (UFV) to sever the liver parenchyma from the caudal to cranial direction, and the middle hepatic vein (MHV) and anterior fissure vein (AFV) were then disconnected at the root. Last, the hepatic vein-guided approach was once more performed along the ventral side of the right hepatic vein (RHV) to transect the liver parenchyma from the cranial to anterior direction, and the middle lobe of the liver, including the tumor, was removed completely. The entire process was applied in a counterclockwise fashion, and the exposure or transection sequence was G58, and G4, followed by UFV, MHV, AFV, and finally, the liver parenchyma along the ventral side of RHV.

Results

The counterclockwise modular LAMH using combined Glissonean pedicle (Takasaki approach) and hepatic vein-guided approaches was feasible in all 6 cases. The median duration of the operation was 275 ± 35.07 min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 283.33 ml. All of the 6 patients recovered smoothly. The Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II complications rate was up to 33.33%, mainly characterized by postoperative pain and a small amount of ascites. No Clavien-Dindo Grade III-V complications occurred, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.83 ± 1.47 days. Follow-up results showed that the average disease-free survival (DFS) was 12.17 months, and the 21-months OS rate, DFS rate and tumor recurrent rate were 100%, 83.33% and 16.67% respectively.

Conclusions

Counterclockwise modular LAMH using combined Glissonean pedicle (Takasaki approach) and hepatic vein-guided approaches takes the advantages of the two approaches, is a novel protocol for LAMH. It is thought to be technically feasible for patients with a centrally located solitary HCC. The oncologic feasibility of this technique needs to be investigated based on long-term follow-up. A multicenter, large-scale, more careful study is necessary.

Laparoscopic vs. open anatomical hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a highly malignant and invasive cancer originating from biliary epithelial cells. The current study was designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

After screening, 95 patients who underwent anatomical hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma at our center were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the surgical approach; the baseline characteristics, pathological findings, surgical outcomes, and long-term outcomes were compared. Moreover, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or pathological findings between the two groups. Regarding short-term outcomes, the intraoperative blood loss, incision length, and length of postoperative hospital stay were more favorable in the laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy group than the open anatomical hepatectomy group (P < 0.05). The two groups differed significantly in the extent of liver resection, with a lower lymph node dissection rate and lymph node yield in the laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the postoperative complication rate was similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). The median postoperative follow-up times were 10.7 and 13.8 months in the laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy and open anatomical hepatectomy groups, respectively. Regarding the long-term follow-up results, OS and DFS were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors for OS were CA-199, CEA, HGB, tumor diameter, and T stage, and those for DFS were CA-199 (P < 0.05), and T stage (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is safe and feasible when performed by experienced surgeons. Compared with open anatomical hepatectomy, laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy provides better short-term outcomes and a comparable long-term prognosis.