1
|
Lorenzini T, Faigle W, Ruder J, Docampo MJ, Opitz L, Martin R. Alterations of Thymus-Derived Tregs in Multiple Sclerosis. NEUROLOGY(R) NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2024; 11:e200251. [PMID: 38838284 PMCID: PMC11160584 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000200251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Multiple sclerosis (MS) is considered a prototypic autoimmune disease of the CNS. It is the leading cause of chronic neurologic disability in young adults. Proinflammatory B cells and autoreactive T cells both play important roles in its pathogenesis. We aimed to study alterations of regulatory T cells (Tregs), which likely also contribute to the disease, but their involvement is less clear. METHODS By combining multiple experimental approaches, we examined the Treg compartments in 41 patients with relapsing-remitting MS and 17 healthy donors. RESULTS Patients with MS showed a reduced frequency of CD4+ T cells and Foxp3+ Tregs and age-dependent alterations of Treg subsets. Treg suppressive function was compromised in patients, who were treated with natalizumab, while it was unaffected in untreated and anti-CD20-treated patients. The changes in natalizumab-treated patients included increased proinflammatory cytokines and an altered transcriptome in thymus-derived (t)-Tregs, but not in peripheral (p)-Tregs. DISCUSSION Treg dysfunction in patients with MS might be related to an altered transcriptome of t-Tregs and a proinflammatory environment. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of Tregs and their subtypes in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiziana Lorenzini
- From the Neuroimmunology and MS Research (T.L., W.F., J.R., M.J.D., R.M.), Neurology Clinic, University Hospital Zurich; Division of Immunology (T.L.), University Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich; Cellerys AG (W.F., R.M.), Schlieren, Switzerland; Immunity and Cancer (U932) (W.F.), Immune Response to Cancer Laboratory, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, CEDEX 05, Paris, France; Functional Genomics Center Zurich (L.O.), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and University of Zurich; Institute of Experimental Immunology (R.M.), University of Zurich, Switzerland; and Therapeutic Design Unit (R.M.), Center for Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Wolfgang Faigle
- From the Neuroimmunology and MS Research (T.L., W.F., J.R., M.J.D., R.M.), Neurology Clinic, University Hospital Zurich; Division of Immunology (T.L.), University Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich; Cellerys AG (W.F., R.M.), Schlieren, Switzerland; Immunity and Cancer (U932) (W.F.), Immune Response to Cancer Laboratory, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, CEDEX 05, Paris, France; Functional Genomics Center Zurich (L.O.), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and University of Zurich; Institute of Experimental Immunology (R.M.), University of Zurich, Switzerland; and Therapeutic Design Unit (R.M.), Center for Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Josefine Ruder
- From the Neuroimmunology and MS Research (T.L., W.F., J.R., M.J.D., R.M.), Neurology Clinic, University Hospital Zurich; Division of Immunology (T.L.), University Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich; Cellerys AG (W.F., R.M.), Schlieren, Switzerland; Immunity and Cancer (U932) (W.F.), Immune Response to Cancer Laboratory, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, CEDEX 05, Paris, France; Functional Genomics Center Zurich (L.O.), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and University of Zurich; Institute of Experimental Immunology (R.M.), University of Zurich, Switzerland; and Therapeutic Design Unit (R.M.), Center for Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - María José Docampo
- From the Neuroimmunology and MS Research (T.L., W.F., J.R., M.J.D., R.M.), Neurology Clinic, University Hospital Zurich; Division of Immunology (T.L.), University Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich; Cellerys AG (W.F., R.M.), Schlieren, Switzerland; Immunity and Cancer (U932) (W.F.), Immune Response to Cancer Laboratory, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, CEDEX 05, Paris, France; Functional Genomics Center Zurich (L.O.), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and University of Zurich; Institute of Experimental Immunology (R.M.), University of Zurich, Switzerland; and Therapeutic Design Unit (R.M.), Center for Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lennart Opitz
- From the Neuroimmunology and MS Research (T.L., W.F., J.R., M.J.D., R.M.), Neurology Clinic, University Hospital Zurich; Division of Immunology (T.L.), University Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich; Cellerys AG (W.F., R.M.), Schlieren, Switzerland; Immunity and Cancer (U932) (W.F.), Immune Response to Cancer Laboratory, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, CEDEX 05, Paris, France; Functional Genomics Center Zurich (L.O.), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and University of Zurich; Institute of Experimental Immunology (R.M.), University of Zurich, Switzerland; and Therapeutic Design Unit (R.M.), Center for Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Roland Martin
- From the Neuroimmunology and MS Research (T.L., W.F., J.R., M.J.D., R.M.), Neurology Clinic, University Hospital Zurich; Division of Immunology (T.L.), University Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich; Cellerys AG (W.F., R.M.), Schlieren, Switzerland; Immunity and Cancer (U932) (W.F.), Immune Response to Cancer Laboratory, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, CEDEX 05, Paris, France; Functional Genomics Center Zurich (L.O.), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and University of Zurich; Institute of Experimental Immunology (R.M.), University of Zurich, Switzerland; and Therapeutic Design Unit (R.M.), Center for Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Blinova VG, Zhdanov DD. Many Faces of Regulatory T Cells: Heterogeneity or Plasticity? Cells 2024; 13:959. [PMID: 38891091 PMCID: PMC11171907 DOI: 10.3390/cells13110959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are essential for maintaining the immune balance in normal and pathological conditions. In autoimmune diseases and transplantation, they restrain the loss of self-tolerance and promote engraftment, whereas in cancer, an increase in Treg numbers is mostly associated with tumor growth and poor prognosis. Numerous markers and their combinations have been used to identify Treg subsets, demonstrating the phenotypic diversity of Tregs. The complexity of Treg identification can be hampered by the unstable expression of some markers, the decrease in the expression of a specific marker over time or the emergence of a new marker. It remains unclear whether such phenotypic shifts are due to new conditions or whether the observed changes are due to initially different populations. In the first case, cellular plasticity is observed, whereas in the second, cellular heterogeneity is observed. The difference between these terms in relation to Tregs is rather blurred. Considering the promising perspectives of Tregs in regenerative cell-based therapy, the existing confusing data on Treg phenotypes require further investigation and analysis. In our review, we introduce criteria that allow us to distinguish between the heterogeneity and plasticity of Tregs normally and pathologically, taking a closer look at their diversity and drawing the line between two terms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varvara G. Blinova
- Laboratory of Medical Biotechnology, Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Pogodinskaya st. 10/8, 119121 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Dmitry D. Zhdanov
- Laboratory of Medical Biotechnology, Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Pogodinskaya st. 10/8, 119121 Moscow, Russia;
- Department of Biochemistry, People’s Friendship University of Russia Named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya st. 6, 117198 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mensink M, Verleng LJ, Schrama E, Janssen GM, Tjokrodirijo RT, van Veelen PA, Jiang Q, Pascutti MF, van der Hoorn ML, Eikmans M, de Kivit S, Borst J. Tregs from human blood differentiate into nonlymphoid tissue-resident effector cells upon TNFR2 costimulation. JCI Insight 2024; 9:e172942. [PMID: 38341270 PMCID: PMC10972588 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.172942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Tregs can facilitate transplant tolerance and attenuate autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Therefore, it is clinically relevant to stimulate Treg expansion and function in vivo and to create therapeutic Treg products in vitro. We report that TNF receptor 2 (TNFR2) is a unique costimulus for naive, thymus-derived Tregs (tTregs) from human blood that promotes their differentiation into nonlymphoid tissue-resident (NLT-resident) effector Tregs, without Th-like polarization. In contrast, CD28 costimulation maintains a lymphoid tissue-resident (LT-resident) Treg phenotype. We base this conclusion on transcriptome and proteome analysis of TNFR2- and CD28-costimulated CD4+ tTregs and conventional T cells (Tconvs), followed by bioinformatic comparison with published transcriptomic Treg signatures from NLT and LT in health and disease, including autoimmunity and cancer. These analyses illuminate that TNFR2 costimulation promoted tTreg capacity for survival, migration, immunosuppression, and tissue regeneration. Functional studies confirmed improved migratory ability of TNFR2-costimulated tTregs. Flow cytometry validated the presence of the TNFR2-driven tTreg signature in effector/memory Tregs from the human placenta, as opposed to blood. Thus, TNFR2 can be exploited as a driver of NLT-resident tTreg differentiation for adoptive cell therapy or antibody-based immunomodulation in human disease.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mensink M, Schrama E, Cuadrado E, Amsen D, de Kivit S, Borst J. Proteomics reveals unique identities of human TGF-β-induced and thymus-derived CD4 + regulatory T cells. Sci Rep 2022; 12:20268. [PMID: 36434024 PMCID: PMC9700829 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23515-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The CD4+ regulatory T (Treg) cell lineage, defined by FOXP3 expression, comprises thymus-derived (t)Treg cells and peripherally induced (p)Treg cells. As a model for Treg cells, studies employ TGF-β-induced (i)Treg cells generated from CD4+ conventional T (Tconv) cells in vitro. Here, we describe how human iTreg cells relate to human blood-derived tTreg and Tconv cells according to proteomic analysis. Each of these cell populations had a unique protein expression pattern. iTreg cells had very limited overlap in protein expression with tTreg cells, regardless of cell activation status and instead shared signaling and metabolic proteins with Tconv cells. tTreg cells had a uniquely modest response to CD3/CD28-mediated stimulation. As a benchmark, we used a previously defined proteomic signature that discerns ex vivo naïve and effector Treg cells from Tconv cells and includes conserved Treg cell properties. iTreg cells largely lacked this Treg cell core signature and highly expressed e.g. STAT4 and NFATC2, which may contribute to inflammatory responses. We also used a proteomic signature that distinguishes ex vivo effector Treg cells from Tconv cells and naïve Treg cells. iTreg cells contained part of this effector Treg cell signature, suggesting acquisition of pTreg cell features. In conclusion, iTreg cells are distinct from tTreg cells and share limited features with ex vivo Treg cells at the proteomic level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Mensink
- Department of Immunology and Oncode Institute, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Schrama
- Department of Immunology and Oncode Institute, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Eloy Cuadrado
- Department of Hematopoiesis, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Derk Amsen
- Department of Hematopoiesis, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander de Kivit
- Department of Immunology and Oncode Institute, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Jannie Borst
- Department of Immunology and Oncode Institute, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Agosto‐Burgos C, Wu EY, Iannone MA, Hu Y, Hogan SL, Henderson CD, Kennedy KB, Blazek L, Herrera CA, Munson D, Falk RJ, Ciavatta DJ, Free ME. The frequency of Treg subsets distinguishes disease activity in ANCA vasculitis. Clin Transl Immunology 2022; 11:e1428. [PMID: 36381498 PMCID: PMC9652144 DOI: 10.1002/cti2.1428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives T regulatory cells (Tregs) are a heterogeneous group of immunoregulatory cells that dampen self-harming immune responses and prevent the development of autoimmune diseases. In anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA) vasculitis, Tregs possess diminished suppressive capacity, which has been attributed to the expression of a FOXP3 splice-variant lacking exon 2 in T cells (FOXP3Δ2 CD4+ T cells). However, the suppressive capacity of Tregs varies between subsets. We evaluated the frequency of Treg subsets in ANCA vasculitis as a potential explanation for diminished suppressive capacity. Methods We developed a custom mass cytometry panel and performed deep immune profiling of Tregs in healthy controls, patients with active disease and in remission. Using these data, we performed multidimensional reduction and discriminant analysis to identify associations between Treg subsets and disease activity. Results Total Tregs were expanded in ANCA vasculitis, which was associated with remission and the administration of rituximab and/or prednisone. The frequency of FOXP3Δ2 CD4+ T cells did not distinguish disease activity and this population had high expression levels of CD127 and lacked both CD25 and Helios, suggesting that they are not conventional Tregs. The frequency of CXCR3+, CD103+ and CCR7+ Tregs distinguished disease activity, and the combination of the frequency of these three Treg subsets segregated active patients from patients in remission and healthy controls. From these three subsets, the frequency of CXCR3+ Tregs distinguished patients with active disease with renal involvement. Conclusion Treg heterogeneity can discriminate disease activity and should be explored as a biomarker of disease activity in ANCA vasculitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Agosto‐Burgos
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC Kidney CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Eveline Y Wu
- Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of PediatricsUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Marie A Iannone
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Yichun Hu
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC Kidney CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Susan L Hogan
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC Kidney CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Candace D Henderson
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC Kidney CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Kristin B Kennedy
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC Kidney CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Lauren Blazek
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC Kidney CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Carolina A Herrera
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC Kidney CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Dominique Munson
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC Kidney CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Ronald J Falk
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC Kidney CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
- Department of MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Dominic J Ciavatta
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC Kidney CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
- Department of GeneticsUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Meghan E Free
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, UNC Kidney CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
- Department of MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pham MN, Khoryati L, Jamison BL, Hayes E, Sullivan JM, Campbell DJ, Gavin MA. In Vivo Expansion of Antigen-Specific Regulatory T Cells through Staggered Fc.IL-2 Mutein Dosing and Antigen-Specific Immunotherapy. Immunohorizons 2021; 5:782-791. [PMID: 34583939 PMCID: PMC11034776 DOI: 10.4049/immunohorizons.2100051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In mice, Ag administration in the absence of adjuvant typically elicits tolerogenic immune responses through the deletion or inactivation of conventional CD4 T cells and the formation or expansion of regulatory CD4 T cells (Treg). Although these "Ag-specific immunotherapy" (ASI) approaches are currently under clinical development to treat autoinflammatory conditions, efficacy and safety may be variable and unpredictable because of the diverse activation states of immune cells in subjects with autoimmune and allergic diseases. To reliably induce Ag-specific tolerance in patients, novel methods to control T cell responses during ASI are needed, and strategies that permanently increase Treg frequencies among Ag-specific CD4 T cells may provide long-lasting immunosuppression between treatments. In this study, we present an approach to durably increase the frequency of Ag-specific Treg in mice by administering ASI when Treg numbers are transiently increased with individual doses of a half-life-extended Treg-selective IL-2 mutein. Repeated weekly cycles of IL-2 mutein doses (day 0) followed by ASI (day 3) resulted in a 3- to 5-fold enrichment in Treg among Ag-responsive CD4 T cells. Expanded Ag-specific Treg persisted for more than 3 wk following treatment cessation, as well as through an inflammatory T cell response to an Ag-expressing virus. Combining Treg enrichment with ASI has the potential to durably treat autoimmune disease or allergy by increasing the Treg/conventional CD4 T cell ratio among autoantigen- or allergen-specific T cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minh N Pham
- Benaroya Research Institute, Seattle, WA; and
| | | | | | - Erika Hayes
- Benaroya Research Institute, Seattle, WA; and
| | | | | | - Marc A Gavin
- Benaroya Research Institute, Seattle, WA; and
- Omeros Corp., Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|