1
|
Dada S, Cocoman O, Portela A, De Brún A, Bhattacharyya S, Tunçalp Ö, Jackson D, Gilmore B. What's in a name? Unpacking 'Community Blank' terminology in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health: a scoping review. BMJ Glob Health 2023; 8:bmjgh-2022-009423. [PMID: 36750272 PMCID: PMC9906186 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Engaging the community as actors within reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) programmes (referred to as 'community blank') has seen increased implementation in recent years. While evidence suggests these approaches are effective, terminology (such as 'community engagement,' 'community participation,' 'community mobilisation,' and 'social accountability') is often used interchangeably across published literature, contributing to a lack of conceptual clarity in practice. The purpose of this review was to describe and clarify varying uses of these terms in the literature by documenting what authors and implementers report they are doing when they use these terms. METHODS Seven academic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Global Health), two grey literature databases (OAIster, OpenGrey) and relevant organisation websites were searched for documents that described 'community blank' terms in RMNCH interventions. Eligibility criteria included being published between 1975 and 1 October 2021 and reports or studies detailing the activities used in 'community blank.' RESULTS: A total of 9779 unique documents were retrieved and screened, with 173 included for analysis. Twenty-four distinct 'community blank' terms were used across the documents, falling into 11 broader terms. Use of these terms was distributed across time and all six WHO regions, with 'community mobilisation', 'community engagement' and 'community participation' being the most frequently used terms. While 48 unique activities were described, only 25 activities were mentioned more than twice and 19 of these were attributed to at least three different 'community blank' terms. CONCLUSION Across the literature, there is inconsistency in the usage of 'community blank' terms for RMNCH. There is an observed interchangeable use of terms and a lack of descriptions of these terms provided in the literature. There is a need for RMNCH researchers and practitioners to clarify the descriptions reported and improve the documentation of 'community blank' implementation. This can contribute to a better sharing of learning within and across communities and to bringing evidence-based practices to scale. Efforts to improve reporting can be supported with the use of standardised monitoring and evaluation processes and indicators. Therefore, it is recommended that future research endeavours clarify the operational definitions of 'community blank' and improve the documentation of its implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Dada
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland .,UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Olive Cocoman
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Anayda Portela
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aoife De Brún
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland,UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Özge Tunçalp
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Debra Jackson
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK
| | - Brynne Gilmore
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland,UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Joiner A, Lee A, Chowa P, Kharel R, Kumar L, Caruzzo NM, Ramirez T, Reynolds L, Sakita F, Van Vleet L, von Isenburg M, Yaffee AQ, Staton C, Vissoci JRN. Access to care solutions in healthcare for obstetric care in Africa: A systematic review. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0252583. [PMID: 34086753 PMCID: PMC8177460 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emergency Medical Services (EMS) systems exist to reduce death and disability from life-threatening medical emergencies. Less than 9% of the African population is serviced by an emergency medical services transportation system, and nearly two-thirds of African countries do not have any known EMS system in place. One of the leading reasons for EMS utilization in Africa is for obstetric emergencies. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide a qualitative description and summation of previously described interventions to improve access to care for patients with maternal obstetric emergencies in Africa with the intent of identifying interventions that can innovatively be translated to a broader emergency context. METHODS The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) under the number CRD42018105371. We searched the following electronic databases for all abstracts up to 10/19/2020 in accordance to PRISMA guidelines: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and African Index Medicus. Articles were included if they were focused on a specific mode of transportation or an access-to-care solution for hospital or outpatient clinic care in Africa for maternal or traumatic emergency conditions. Exclusion criteria included in-hospital solutions intended to address a lack of access. Reference and citation analyses were performed, and a data quality assessment was conducted. Data analysis was performed using a qualitative metasynthesis approach. FINDINGS A total of 6,457 references were imported for screening and 1,757 duplicates were removed. Of the 4,700 studies that were screened against title and abstract, 4,485 studies were excluded. Finally, 215 studies were assessed for full-text eligibility and 152 studies were excluded. A final count of 63 studies were included in the systematic review. In the 63 studies that were included, there was representation from 20 countries in Africa. The three most common interventions included specific transportation solutions (n = 39), community engagement (n = 28) and education or training initiatives (n = 27). Over half of the studies included more than one category of intervention. INTERPRETATION Emergency care systems across Africa are understudied and interventions to improve access to care for obstetric emergencies provides important insight into existing solutions for other types of emergency conditions. Physical access to means of transportation, efforts to increase layperson knowledge and recognition of emergent conditions, and community engagement hold the most promise for future efforts at improving emergency access to care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjni Joiner
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Austin Lee
- Division of Global Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Phindile Chowa
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Ramu Kharel
- Division of Global Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Lekshmi Kumar
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Nayara Malheiros Caruzzo
- Physical Education Department, State University of Maringá, Maringá, PR, United States of America
| | - Thais Ramirez
- Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Lindy Reynolds
- University of Alabama School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Francis Sakita
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania
| | - Lee Van Vleet
- Durham County Emergency Services, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Megan von Isenburg
- Medical Center Library, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Anna Quay Yaffee
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Catherine Staton
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gram L, Fitchett A, Ashraf A, Daruwalla N, Osrin D. Promoting women's and children's health through community groups in low-income and middle-income countries: a mixed-methods systematic review of mechanisms, enablers and barriers. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4:e001972. [PMID: 31908874 PMCID: PMC6936553 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Revised: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Community mobilisation through group activities has been used to improve women's and children's health in a range of low-income and middle-income contexts, but the mechanisms through which it works deserve greater consideration. We did a mixed-methods systematic review of mechanisms, enablers and barriers to the promotion of women's and children's health in community mobilisation interventions. METHODS We searched for theoretical and empirical peer-reviewed articles between January 2000 and November 2018. First, we extracted and collated proposed mechanisms, enablers and barriers into categories. Second, we extracted and synthesised evidence for them using narrative synthesis. We assessed risk of bias with adapted Downs and Black and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists. We assigned confidence grades to each proposed mechanism, enabler and barrier. RESULTS 78 articles met the inclusion criteria, of which 39 described interventions based on a participatory group education model, 19 described community-led structural interventions to promote sexual health in marginalised populations and 20 concerned other types of intervention or multiple interventions at once. We did not have high confidence in any mechanism, enabler or barrier. Two out of 15 proposed mechanisms and 10 out of 12 proposed enablers and barriers reached medium confidence. A few studies provided direct evidence relating proposed mechanisms, enablers or barriers to health behaviours or health outcomes. Only two studies presented mediation or interaction analysis for a proposed mechanism, enabler or barrier. CONCLUSION We uncovered multiple proposed mechanisms, enablers and barriers to health promotion through community groups, but much work remains to provide a robust evidence base for proposed mechanisms, enablers and barriers. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018093695.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Gram
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Adam Fitchett
- Faculty of Life Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Asma Ashraf
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nayreen Daruwalla
- Society for Nutrition, Education & Health Action (SNEHA), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - David Osrin
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morrison J, Osrin D, Alcock G, Azad K, Bamjan J, Budhathoki B, Kuddus A, Mala MA, Manandhar D, Nkhata A, Pathak S, Phiri T, Rath S, Tripathy P, Costello A, Houweling TAJ. Exploring the equity impact of a maternal and newborn health intervention: a qualitative study of participatory women's groups in rural South Asia and Africa. Int J Equity Health 2019; 18:55. [PMID: 30971254 PMCID: PMC6458781 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-019-0957-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A consensus is developing on interventions to improve newborn survival, but little is known about how to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in newborn mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Participatory learning and action (PLA) through women's groups can improve newborn survival and home care practices equitably across socioeconomic strata, as shown in cluster randomised controlled trials. We conducted a qualitative study to understand the mechanisms that led to the equitable impact of the PLA approach across socioeconomic strata in four trial sites in India, Nepal, Bangladesh, and Malawi. METHODS We conducted 42 focus group discussions (FGDs) with women who had attended groups and women who had not attended, in poor and better-off communities. We also interviewed six better-off women and nine poor women who had delivered babies during the trials and had demonstrated recommended behaviours. We conducted 12 key informant interviews and five FGDs with women's group facilitators and fieldworkers. RESULTS Women's groups addressed a knowledge deficit in poor and better-off women. Women were engaged through visual learning and participatory tools, and learned from the facilitator and each other. Facilitators enabled inclusion of all socioeconomic strata, ensuring that strategies were low-cost and that discussions and advice were relevant. Groups provided a social support network that addressed some financial barriers to care and gave women the confidence to promote behaviour change. Information was disseminated through home visits and other strategies. The social process of learning and action, which led to increased knowledge, confidence to act, and acceptability of recommended practices, was key to ensuring behaviour change across social strata. These equitable effects were enabled by the accessibility, relevance, and engaging format of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS Participatory learning and action led to increased knowledge, confidence to act, and acceptability of recommended practices. The equitable behavioural effects were facilitated by the accessibility, relevance, and engaging format of the intervention across socioeconomic groups, and by reaching-out to parts of the population usually not accessed. A PLA approach improved health behaviours across socioeconomic strata in rural communities, around issues for which there was a knowledge deficit and where simple changes could be made at home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Morrison
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
| | - David Osrin
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Glyn Alcock
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Kishwar Azad
- BADAS, Room No-390, BIRDEM Building 122,Kazi Nazrul Islam Avenue,Shahbagh, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh
| | | | | | - Abdul Kuddus
- BADAS, Room No-390, BIRDEM Building 122,Kazi Nazrul Islam Avenue,Shahbagh, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anthony Costello
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gram L, Daruwalla N, Osrin D. Understanding participation dilemmas in community mobilisation: can collective action theory help? J Epidemiol Community Health 2018; 73:90-96. [PMID: 30377247 PMCID: PMC6839791 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2018-211045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2018] [Revised: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 10/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Community mobilisation interventions have been used to promote health in many low-income and middle-income settings. They frequently involve collective action to address shared determinants of ill-health, which often requires high levels of participation to be effective. However, the non-excludable nature of benefits produced often generates participation dilemmas: community members have an individual interest in abstaining from collective action and free riding on others’ contributions, but no benefit is produced if nobody participates. For example, marches, rallies or other awareness-raising activities to change entrenched social norms affect the social environment shared by community members whether they participate or not. This creates a temptation to let other community members invest time and effort. Collective action theory provides a rich, principled framework for analysing such participation dilemmas. Over the past 50 years, political scientists, economists, sociologists and psychologists have proposed a plethora of incentive mechanisms to solve participation dilemmas: selective incentives, intrinsic benefits, social incentives, outsize stakes, intermediate goals, interdependency and critical mass theory. We discuss how such incentive mechanisms might be used by global health researchers to produce new questions about how community mobilisation works and conclude with theoretical predictions to be explored in future quantitative or qualitative research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Gram
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nayreen Daruwalla
- SNEHA (Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action), Mumbai, India
| | - David Osrin
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beck DC, Munro-Kramer ML, Lori JR. A scoping review on community mobilisation for maternal and child health in sub-Saharan Africa: Impact on empowerment. Glob Public Health 2018; 14:375-395. [PMID: 30182808 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1516228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
This review integrates evidence on community mobilisation (CM) for maternal and child health in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to identify the impact on empowerment. For the purposes of this review we use the following definition of CM: 'a capacity-building process through which community members, groups or organizations plan, carry out and evaluate activities on a participatory and sustained basis to improve their health and other conditions, either on their own initiative or stimulated by others', [Howard-Grabman, L., Storti, C., Hummer, P., Pooler, B., & Geneva: USAID (2007). Demystifying community mobilization: An effective strategy to improve maternal and newborn health. Retrieved from http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnadi338.pdf, p. 5]. A scoping review was chosen to conduct a search and analysis of the literature due to the broad, complex nature of the topic. The search yielded 136 articles, and 19 met the inclusion criteria. This review illustrates CM as an important research process for engaging the community, ensuring that interventions are meeting the needs of the community, take context into account and are sustainable. Community mobilisation was associated with positive behaviour change and/or health outcomes. However, community mobilisation was not defined or operationalised consistently among the identified studies. Empowerment was also not defined, measured, or reported on in the articles. This review provides recommendations for the reporting of CM and its influence on empowerment in communities in sub-Saharan Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana C Beck
- Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michelle L Munro-Kramer
- Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jody R Lori
- Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gram L, Skordis-Worrall J, Manandhar DS, Strachan D, Morrison J, Saville N, Osrin D, Tumbahangphe KM, Costello A, Heys M. The long-term impact of community mobilisation through participatory women's groups on women's agency in the household: A follow-up study to the Makwanpur trial. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0197426. [PMID: 29758071 PMCID: PMC5951552 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Women's groups practicing participatory learning and action (PLA) in rural areas have been shown to improve maternal and newborn survival in low-income countries, but the pathways from intervention to impact remain unclear. We assessed the long-term impact of a PLA intervention in rural Nepal on women's agency in the household. In 2014, we conducted a follow-up study to a cluster randomised controlled trial on the impact of PLA women's groups from 2001-2003. Agency was measured using the Relative Autonomy Index (RAI) and its subdomains. Multi-level regression analyses were performed adjusting for baseline socio-demographic characteristics. We additionally adjusted for potential exposure to subsequent PLA groups based on women's pregnancy status and conduct of PLA groups in areas of residence. Sensitivity analyses were performed using two alternative measures of agency. We analysed outcomes for 4030 mothers (66% of the cohort) who survived and were recruited to follow-up at mean age 39.6 years. Across a wide range of model specifications, we found no association between exposure to the original PLA intervention with women's agency in the household approximately 11.5 years later. Subsequent exposure to PLA groups was not associated with greater agency in the household at follow-up, but some specifications found evidence for reduced agency. Household agency may be a prerequisite for actualising the benefits of PLA groups rather than a consequence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Gram
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | | | | | - Daniel Strachan
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joanna Morrison
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Naomi Saville
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Osrin
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anthony Costello
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health (MCA), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Michelle Heys
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sharma S, Teijlingen EV, Belizán JM, Hundley V, Simkhada P, Sicuri E. Measuring What Works: An Impact Evaluation of Women's Groups on Maternal Health Uptake in Rural Nepal. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0155144. [PMID: 27214032 PMCID: PMC4877042 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2015] [Accepted: 04/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a need for studies evaluating maternal health interventions in low-income countries. This paper evaluates one such intervention designed to promote maternal health among rural women in Nepal. METHODS AND RESULTS This was a five-year controlled, non-randomised, repeated cross-sectional study (2007, 2010, 2012) of a participatory community-based maternal health promotion intervention focusing on women's groups to improve maternal health services uptake. In total 1,236 women of childbearing age, who had their last child ≤ two years ago, were interviewed. Difference-in-Difference estimation assessed the effects of the intervention on selected outcome variables while controlling for a constructed wealth index and women's characteristics. In the first three years (from 2007 to the 2010), the intervention increased women's likelihood of attending for antenatal care at least once during pregnancy by seven times [OR = 7.0, 95%CI (2.3; 21.4)], of taking iron and folic acid by three times [OR = 3.0, 95%CI (1.2; 7.8)], and of seeking four or more antenatal care visits of two times, although not significantly [OR = 2.2, 95%CI (1.0; 4.7)]. Over five years, women were more likely to seek antenatal care at least once [OR = 3.0, 95%CI (1.5; 5.2)], to take iron/folic acid [OR = 1.9, [95% CI (1.1; 3.2)], and to attend postnatal care [OR = 1.5, [95% CI (1.1; 2.2)]. No improvement was found on attending antenatal care in the first trimester, birthing at an institution or with a skilled birth attendant. CONCLUSION Community-based health promotion has a much stronger effect on the uptake of antenatal care and less on delivery care. Other factors not easily resolved through health promotion interventions may influence these outcomes, such as costs or geographical constraints. The evaluation has implications for policy and practice in public health, especially maternal health promotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheetal Sharma
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, United Kingdom
| | - Edwin van Teijlingen
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, United Kingdom
| | - José M Belizán
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Vanora Hundley
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, United Kingdom
| | - Padam Simkhada
- Centre for Public Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Elisa Sicuri
- ISGlobal, Barcelona Ctr. Int. Health Res. (CRESIB), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Health Economics Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|