Clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients operated for complex open tibial pilon fractures

Management of complex pilon fractures: Is it necessary to fix all the columns in AO/OTA type 43-C fractures?

INTRODUCTION

Surgical treatment of AO/OTA 43-C pilon fractures has not yet taken a standard form. We aimed to evaluate whether patients that appeared to be labelled as unsupported columns according to the four-column theory would affect long-term clinical and radiological outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with AO/OTA 43-C type who were treated surgically between January 2010 and December 2019 were included in the study. 53 fractures in 52 patients who received osteosynthesis were categorized based on the fixed columns. These groups were formed as fully supported columns (FSC- Group A), partly supported columns (PSC-Group B), Ankle range of motions (ROM), Burwell Charnley's reduction evaluation criteria, Kellgren-Lawrence ankle osteoarthritis staging system, and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Scoring System, Olerud-Molander Ankle Score, Visual Analog Scale were used for evaluating radiological and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 72.6 (12-131) months. Mean age was 42.6 (18-76). Two groups were homogenously distributed in terms of age (p = 0.785), sex (p = 0.376), laterality (p = 0.732), smoking status (p = 0.488) and reduction quality. There was no difference in AOFAS score (p = 0.452), Olerud-Molander score (p = 0.354) and VAS scores (p = 0.589). TAS, TLS and TT angle measurements suggested no difference between groups (p = 0.493, p = 0.834, p = 0.577). There was no difference between groups in terms of infection (p = 0.734), malunion (p = 0.688) and arthritis (p = 0.483) CONCLUSION: We presented findings that contradicted the hypothesis positing the existence of four distinct columns in pilon fractures, as well as the notion that each fractured column requires support from distinct implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

An Examination of Personalized Approaches in the Management of Ankle Fractures: A Thorough Evaluation of Soft Tissue Factors, Treatment Methods, and Patient Adherence

This study offers a thorough analysis of tibial pilon fractures, accounting for patient compliance, diverse treatment options, and soft tissue implications. The article discusses varied treatment pathways, ranging from single-stage interventions to two-stage methods for open fractures by presenting seven clinical cases. The emphasis is on the intricate interplay of trauma intensity, bone damage, and adjacent soft tissue in dictating treatment plans and patient outcomes. The challenges posed by non-compliant patients rejecting advised treatments are underscored, illuminating the inherent risks. Drawing from varied patient demographics, comorbidities, and fracture types, a comprehensive guide for clinicians emerges. The findings underscore the importance of a tailored, patient-centric approach, considering the multifaceted nature of ankle fractures, local soft tissue health, patient's overall well-being, and their adherence to the proposed treatment regimen.

Management of High-Energy Tibial Pilon Fractures

➤ Pilon fractures in the younger patient population are frequently high-energy, intra-articular injuries and are associated with devastating, long-term impacts on patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life, as well as high rates of persistent disability.➤ Judicious management of associated soft-tissue injury, including open fractures, is essential to minimizing complications. Optimizing medical comorbidities and negative social behaviors (e.g., smoking) should be addressed perioperatively.➤ Delayed internal fixation with interval temporizing external fixation represents the preferred technique for managing most high-energy pilon fractures presenting with characteristically substantial soft-tissue trauma. In some cases, surgeons elect to utilize circular fixation for these scenarios.➤ Although there have been treatment advances, the results have been generally poor, with high rates of posttraumatic arthritis, despite expert care.➤ Primary arthrodesis may be indicated in cases with severe articular cartilage injury that, in the opinion of the treating surgeon, is likely unsalvageable at the time of the index management.➤ The addition of intrawound vancomycin powder at the time of definitive fixation represents a low-cost prophylactic measure that appears to be effective in reducing gram-positive deep surgical site infections.

Orthoplastic Treatment of Open Lower-Limb Fractures Improves Outcomes: A 12-Year Review

BACKGROUND

The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Orthopaedics and Trauma 4 (BOAST 4) inform the management of open lower-limb fractures. The authors conducted repeated reviews of performance against these standards over a 12-year period. This latest iteration has shown further improvements in outcomes concomitant with changes in service delivery.

METHODS

Data on Gustilo-Anderson grade IIIB or IIIC open lower-limb fractures were collected from a prospectively constructed departmental database and analyzed using Excel. Outcomes assessed included time to stabilization, time to definitive soft-tissue coverage, and deep infection rates.

RESULTS

A total of 69% of patients in our cohort received care that aligned with BOAST 4 guidelines. Median time to stabilization was 14.2 hours and to soft-tissue coverage was 47 hours, with 71% of cases compliant with BOAST 4 guidelines. The overall deep infection rate was 6.5% in our cohort. There was a significantly lower deep infection rate in BOAST 4-compliant cases (2%) versus noncompliant cases (16%), respectively (P = 0.05). A total of 41 of 61 patients had fixation and soft-tissue coverage in a single operation (fix and flap), eight had staged operations, and 12 required local flap closure. There was no significant difference in deep infection rates among these approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance with the BOAST 4 guidelines and time to definitive soft-tissue coverage have improved at our center since the last review. Deep infection rates were significantly lower in BOAST 4-compliant cases, further validating this approach. The fix and flap technique was introduced during the study period and reduces operative burden for patients. These results support a joint orthoplastic approach as the optimal management for these complex injuries.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Comparison of prone-supine versus supine position for the treatment of pilon fractures via modified posteromedial approach combined with anterolateral approach

BACKGROUND

Most of modified posteromedial approaches require prone position for the treatment of pilon fractures. We describe the technique of modified posteromedial approach under supine position. The goal of the study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of prone-supine versus supine position for the treatment of pilon fractures via modified posteromedial approach combined with anterolateral approach.

METHODS

A total of 50 retrospectively consecutive pilon fractures that underwent open reduction internal fixation via modified posteromedial approach combined with anterolateral approach from 2016 to 2019 were reviewed at least a two-year follow up. The positions of patients were divided into two groups: prone-supine versus supine position (26 vs 24, respectively). The operation time, radiographic outcomes including bone union time and ratio of congruent articular reduction were evaluated. The post-operative function was evaluated using the Manchester Oxford score (MOXFQ) and the visual analogue score (VAS). The motion of ankle joint and complications and were also compared.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 42.2(24.7-73.0) months in the prone-supine group and 42.7(37.3-56.5) months in the supine group (P = .87). The mean operation time was 141.9 ± 10.1 min in the prone-supine group and 107.5 ± 18.9 min in the supine group (P = .00). There was no significant difference in the bone union time and ratio of congruent articular reduction between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the final MOXFQ score, VAS score, and the mean range of ankle motion between the two groups (P > .05). The total incidence of complications was 11.5% in the prone-supine group and 16.6% in the supine group (P = .66).

CONCLUSION

The patient in the prone-supine position versus supine position for pilon fractures via modified posteromedial approach combined with anterolateral approach contributed comparable quality of reduction, bone union time functional outcomes and complications. The supine technique was significantly shorter in terms of operation time.

Tibial pilon fractures treated with a periarticular external fixator: Retrospective study of 47 cases

INTRODUCTION

Tibial pilon fractures are a treatment challenge, since there is no true gold standard treatment, and because of potential skin complications. Periarticular external fixation (PAEF) appears to produce good results, but the outcomes with the TL-HEX Trauma™ (Orthofix®, Verona, Italy) have not yet been evaluated. We performed a study with the following objectives: 1) evaluate time to union and union rate; 2) determine clinical and radiological results; 3) detect complications.

HYPOTHESIS

PAEF will produce comparable fracture union to other external fixator techniques for tibial pilon fractures.

METHODS

A single center, retrospective study, was done between June 2016 and December 2018. Patients who had a tibial pilon fracture operated with a PAEF were included if they had a minimum of 12 months' follow-up. Forty-seven patients were included; the mean follow-up was 2.45 years (1.2-3.7). The primary endpoint was the time to union and union rate at the final assessment. The secondary endpoints were the joint range of motion, residual pain (VAS), functional scores (AOFAS and SF12) and complication rate.

RESULTS

The union rate was 70% (33/47) and the mean time to union was 201±79 days (89-369). The range of motion was significantly reduced relative to the contralateral side. Twenty patients had residual pain that averaged 2.9 (1-6) on the VAS. The mean AOFAS score was 74 points (51-95). Twenty patients (43%) suffered at least one complication.

DISCUSSION

While a PAEF helps to avoid skin complications, in our study, it was associated with a lower union rate and longer time to union than in other published studies. This difference is likely due to a higher rate of open fractures and high-energy trauma in our study, different protocol for return to weightbearing and a different external fixator than other studies. This is the first study reporting the results of the TL-HEX Trauma in this indication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

Open versus closed pilon fractures: Comparison of management, outcomes, and complications

BACKGROUND

Despite the low incidence of pilon fractures amongst lower limb injuries, their high impact nature presents difficulties in surgical management and recovery. The high complication rate and long recovery times presents a challenge for surgeons and patients. Current literature is varied, with no universal treatment algorithm. We aim to highlight differences in outcomes and complications between open and closed pilon fractures, and between patients treated by open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or fine wire fixator (FWF) for open and closed fracture subgroups.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at a major trauma centre including 135 patients over a 6-year period. Primary outcome was AOFAS score at 3, 6, and 12-months post-injury. Secondary outcomes included time to partial weight-bear (PWB) and full weight-bear (FWB), bone union time, and complications during the follow-up time. AO/OTA classification was used (43A: n = 23, 43B: n = 30, 43C: n = 82). Interobserver agreement was high for bone union time (kappa=0.882) and AO/OTA class (kappa=0.807).

RESULTS

Higher AOFAS scores were seen in ORIF groups of both open and closed fractures, compared to FWF groups. The difference was not statistically significant apart from 12-month AOFAS score of 43C open fractures (p = 0.003) and in 43B closed fractures 3 and 6 months post-injury (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). The majority of ORIF subgroups, open and closed fractures, also had shorter time to PWB, FWB, time to union, and follow-up. Statistically significant differences were seen in the following cases: ORIF-treated 43B closed fracture subgroup had shorter time to PWB and FWB (p<0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively), ORIF-treated 43C closed fractures had shorter time to union (p = 0.005). Common complications for open fractures were non-union (24%), post-traumatic arthritis (16%); for closed fractures they were post-traumatic arthritis (24%), superficial infection (21%). All occurred more frequently in FWF-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Most ORIF-treated subgroups in either open or closed pilon fractures showed better primary and secondary outcomes than FWF-treated subgroups, yet few were statistically significant. Overall, our use of a two-staged approach involving temporary external fixation, followed with ORIF or FWF achieved low complication rates and good functional recovery.

Instagram and Pilon Fractures: An Analysis of Social Media and Its Relationship to Patient Injury Perception

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate social media posts regarding pilon fractures and its relationship to patient injury perception. We evaluated Instagram media posts in patients who have suffered pilon fractures for the following variables: gender, tone, discussion of rehabilitation, activities of daily living (ADL) reference, incision/scar reference, pain, post of radiograph/imaging, external fixation reference, discussion of bracing/splinting, pre- or postoperative swelling, and need for reoperation. Results were determined by comparing each variable to gender and tone of the post to study patient injury perception. Methods: Public Instagram posts from within a 1-year time period were isolated and evaluated using the hashtag "#pilonfracture." Individual posts were analyzed by authors. In total, 241 patient posts were included for investigation and analysis of patient injury perception via social media. Results: Of all included posts, 88% of posts had a positive tone. A majority of the posts (66.8%) mentioned rehabilitation and postoperative progress. There were significant associations between positive tone and rehabilitation (P = .0001), as well as positive tone and ADLs (P = .0361). Conclusion: Reported outcomes after surgical management of pilon fractures are generally poor. Nonetheless, this analysis of patients sharing their experience on social media after open reduction internal fixation of pilon fractures demonstrates a mostly positive attitude toward the injury and recovery. A positive tone of the post was significantly associated with mentions of rehabilitation and ADLs.Levels of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective comparative study.

Ankle joint salvage and reconstruction by limited ORIF combined with an Ilizarov external fixator for complex open tibial pilon fractures (AO 43-C3.3) with segmental bone defects

Background

Open pilon fractures combined with sizeable segmental bone defects are rare, difficult to treat, and often result in the loss of ankle joint function. The purpose of this study was to determine clinical outcomes in patients with open pilon fractures and sizeable segmental bone defects treated by limited ORIF combined with an Ilizarov external fixator.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of open pilon fractures with sizeable segmental bone defects treated by limited ORIF combined with the Ilizarov external fixator strategy between July 2014 and August 2019. All patients were included for assessments of fracture healing and infection rates. Ankle functional outcomes were assessed in all patients according to the Paley criteria and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) at least 24 months post-injury.

Results

All patients were followed up for a mean of 41.09 months. The mean bone defect size was 5.64 ± 1.21 cm. The average EFI and BTI were 1.56 ± 0.28 months/cm and 11.12 ± 0.74 days/cm, respectively. According to the Paley evaluation system, the success rate of ankle joint reconstruction was 64% (7/11). The mean score based on the AOFAS functional assessment was 77.73 ± 8.87. Five patients showed posttraumatic arthritis, one of whom required ankle arthrodesis. Three patients developed pin site infections, and one patient developed a deep infection after bone grafting.

Conclusion

The strategy of limited ORIF combined with an Ilizarov external fixator can restore ankle function in most patients with complex open tibial pilon fractures. Ankle stiffness, pin tract infection, and traumatic arthritis were the most common complications associated with this therapy.

Complications and Soft-Tissue Coverage After Complete Articular, Open Tibial Plafond Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incidence of nonunion and wound complications after open, complete articular pilon fractures. Second, to study the effect that both timing of fixation and timing of flap coverage have on deep infection rates.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Three Academic Level 1 Trauma Centers.

PATIENTS

One hundred sixty-one patients with open OTA/AO type 43C distal tibia fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) between 2002 and 2018. The mean (SD) age was 46 (14) years, 70% male, with median (interquartile range) follow-up of 2.1 (1.3-5.0) years (minimum 1 year). There were 133 (83%) type 3A and 28 (17%) type 3B open fractures.

INTERVENTION

Fracture fixation: acute, primary (<24 hours) versus delayed, staged ORIF (>24 hours). Soft-tissue coverage: rotational or free flap.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

Primary outcomes included deep infection and nonunion. Secondary outcomes included rates of soft-tissue coverage and reoperation.

RESULTS

Acute fixation (<24 hours) was performed in 36 (22%) patients; 125 (78%) underwent delayed, staged fixation. Deep infection occurred in 27% patients and was associated with men (33% vs. 16%, P = 0.029), smoking (38% vs. 23%, P = 0.047), and type 3B fractures (39% vs. 25%, P = 0.046). Acute fixation of type 3A fractures demonstrated a higher rate of infection (38% vs. 20% P = 0.036) than delayed, staged fixation. In type 3B fractures, early flap coverage (<1 week) demonstrated a lower rate of infection (18% vs. 53%, P = 0.066) and 20% (vs. 43%) with a single-staged "fix and flap" procedure (P = 0.408). Nonunion occurred in 36 (22%) and was associated with deep infection (43% vs. 15%, P < 0.001). Fifteen (42%) were septic nonunions. Twenty-nine of the 36 (81%) nonunions achieved radiographic union after median (interquartile range) 27 (20-41) weeks and median (range) 1 (1-3) revision ORIF procedures. There was no difference in the rate of secondary union between septic and aseptic nonunions (85% vs. 86%, P = 1.00). There was a high rate of secondary procedures (47%): revision ORIF (17%), irrigation and debridement (15%), and removal of implants (11%).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete articular, open pilon fractures are associated with a high rate of complications after ORIF. Early fixation carries a high risk of deep infection; however, early flap coverage for 3B fractures seems to play a protective role. We advocate for aggressive management including urgent surgical debridement and very early soft-tissue cover combined with definitive fixation during single procedure if possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A systematic review of the "Logsplitter" injury: how much do we know?

BACKGROUND

As an emerging proposed type of ankle joint injury, the concept of logsplitter injury is a unified overview of the high-energy ankle fracture and dislocation accompanied by distal tibiofibular syndesmosis separation and displacement. Since the concept of logsplitter injury is still relatively novel, there is no uniform standard for its clinical classification, diagnosis and treatment currently. Thus, we reviewed previous literatures here to provide certain references for its better clinical diagnosis and treatment in future.

METHODS

The available literatures from January 1985 to June 2020 in five medical databases were searched and analyzed. The original articles that evaluated the outcomes of patients treated surgically for the logsplitter injury were included. The detailed data were then extracted from each research, including the researchers, type of study, level of evidence, type of center research, groups, number of patients, gender, age, causes of injury, time from injury to surgery, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of follow-up, postoperative complications and clinical outcomes. The overall search procedures were performed by the two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Seven pieces of researches (199 patients) were eligible for inclusion. All researches were either retrospective or prospective study, and all but one was single center study. Falling from height ranked first in the causes of injury (52.8%), and followed by the traffic accidents (29.6%). Clinical outcomes were all measured using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the mean AOFAS score at the final follow-up was 77.9 points.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the definitive consensuses exists on how logsplitter injury should be diagnosed and surgically managed. In light of the novel concept, short presentation time and numerous postoperative complications, the logsplitter injury has not been well understood by most surgeons currently, and its overall situation still needs to be supported by a larger sample size of multicenter research in the future.

Definitive management of open pilon fractures with fine wire fixation

INTRODUCTION

The BOAST (British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma) guidelines advise that open pilon fractures amongst other open lower limb fractures need to be treated at a specialist centre with Orthoplastic care. The purpose of this study was to determine clinical outcomes in patients with open pilon fractures treated as per BOAST guidelines alongside a treatment protocol which consisted of early wound debridement and spanning external fixation, delayed soft tissue coverage with a flap when necessary and delayed definitive fixation with the use of a Fine Wire Fixator.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of open pilon fractures treated between 2014 and 2019. All patients were included for the assessment of the rate of infection and fracture healing. Functional outcome assessment was performed in all patients according to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) at 12 months post injury.

RESULTS

There were 20 patients including 16 males and 4 females. The mean age was 50.45 years. Initial wound with bone debridement and application of a spanning external fixator was performed within an average of 13.5 hours. The mean time from primary surgery to definitive fixation was 24.5 days. There were 3 patients with Gustilo Type I injuries, 6 with Type II, 4 Type with type IIIa and 7 with Type IIIb injuries. Average time to bone union was 10.4 (Range: 2-18) months. The mean AOFAS score was 74.2 (Range: 28-97). A Taylor Spatial Frame was used on 18 patients, while 2 patients had an Ilizarov frame. A corticotomy was performed on 4 patients with critical bone defect post debridement. There was 1 case of deep infection and 9 cases of superficial infection. There were also 4 cases of delayed union which required bone grafting from their femur using a RIA (Reamer Irrigation Aspirator).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the use of staged wound debridement including relatively aggressive bone debridement in conjunction with systemic and local antibiotics, external fixators and patient tailored conversion from spanning external fixator to fine wire frame achieves low rates of wound infection and complications for patients with open pilon fractures.