Starr frame-assisted and minimally invasive internal fixation for pelvic fractures: Simultaneous anterior and posterior ring stability

Evolution of the reduction technique for unstable pelvic ring fractures: a narrative review

Unstable pelvic ring fractures are associated with high mortality and morbidity, and the quality of reduction is critical to the prognosis. While previous reviews have examined general fracture reduction techniques, there is limited focus on the specific advancements and challenges in the reduction technique of unstable pelvic ring fractures. The pelvic fracture reduction technique has undergone a four-stage evolution: open reduction, conventional closed reduction, navigation-assisted closed reduction, and robot-assisted automatic closed reduction. This review discusses and compares the features, effectiveness, and safety of each reduction technique. Open reduction improves clinical outcomes compared to nonsurgical management; however, it is no longer commonly practiced due to its association with extensive soft tissue damage. Although conventional closed reduction is minimally invasive and reduces intraoperative blood loss, surgical duration, and the length of hospital stay, frequent fluoroscopy is required to assess the reduction position, imposing a high risk of radiation exposure. Computer-aided navigation technology has advanced closed reduction techniques by allowing better visualization of the fracture site and surgical instruments, thereby enhancing the quality of pelvic fracture reduction and reducing radiation exposure. The recently developed robot-assisted automatic reduction technique relieves the burden on orthopedic surgeons and further reduces intraoperative radiation exposure. Future advancements in the pelvic reduction technique may involve big data-based intelligent reduction to enable broader indications such as bilateral pelvic fractures.

A Countertraction Closed Reduction Technique in Minimally Invasive Fixation of Recent Type C Pelvic Ring Injuries

OBJECTIVE

Closed reduction of pelvic injuries is a prerequisite and critical step in minimally invasive treatment. Achieving non-invasive closed reduction of pelvic injuries is a challenging clinical problem. This study demonstrated a non-invasive traction technique for closed reduction called countertraction closed reduction technique (CCRT) and evaluated its effectiveness for type C pelvic ring injuries.

METHOD

The data of patients with unstable pelvic fractures treated with CCRT and minimally invasive fixation were retrospectively reviewed from January 2017 to February 2022. Sacroiliac screws were placed to fix the posterior pelvic ring, and internal or external fixation was used to fix the anterior pelvic ring. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of hospital stay, fracture union and postoperative complications were recorded. Fracture reduction quality was evaluated using the Matta scoring criteria. Functional recovery and general quality of life were evaluated using the Majeed functional scoring criteria.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (nine males and four females), with an average age of 49.6 years were treated with CCRT and followed up for a mean of 18.5 months. The average operation time was 137.2 minutes (range 92-195 minutes), the average intraoperative blood loss was 31.2 mL (range 10-120 mL) and the average duration of hospital stay was 14.3 days (range 4-32 days). All patients achieved bony union with an average union time of 11.9 weeks (range 10-16 weeks). According to the Matta radiographic criteria, the quality of fracture reduction was excellent in eight patients, good in four, and fair in one. The average Majeed functional score was 89.7 (range 78-100). The functional evaluation revealed that the outcomes were excellent in nine patients, and good in four patients. Complications included incision fat liquefaction in one patient, and heterotopic ossification in another patient. There were no surgical complications as a result of CCRT.

CONCLUSION

CCRT is a non-invasive closed reduction method for minimally invasive fixation of fresh Tile C1 and C2 pelvic fractures. The advantages of CCRT combined with minimally invasive treatment include a small surgical incision, reduced intraoperative bleeding, satisfactory fracture reduction, bone healing and functional recovery.

Clinical study of modified INFIX combined with sacroiliac joint screws for pelvic instable injuries

OBJECTIVE

The INFIX technique is becoming one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures for anterior pelvic ring instability injuries. The purpose of this article is to compare the clinical outcomes of modified anterior subcutaneous internal fixation (M-INFIX) with conventional anterior subcutaneous internal fixation (C-INFIX) for anterior pelvic ring instability injuries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 36 cases of unstable pelvic injuries treated operatively at our institution, 20 of which were treated with C-INFIX and 16 with M-INFIX. Data collected included age, gender, ISS score, fracture typing, operative time, operative bleeding, postoperative complications, fracture healing time, Matta score, Majeed score, and follow-up time. Statistical sub-folding of each variable between the two groups was performed.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between the C-INFIX and M-INFIX groups in terms of age, gender, ISS (Injury Severity Score), follow-up time, fracture typing, fracture healing time, and Majeed score (P > 0.05). the M-INFIX had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications than the C-INFIX group, especially in the incidence of Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) injury (P < 0.05). In contrast, the M-INFIX group had statistically higher operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and Matta score than the C-INFIX group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study was based on a modified application of the surgical experience with C-INFIX and showed better clinical outcomes in terms of complication rates and quality of repositioning than the conventional surgical approach. These findings indicate that further analytical studies of this study would be valuable.

Comparison of Computer-Assisted Navigation and 3D Printed Patient-Specific Template for the Iliosacral Screw Placement

BACKGROUND

Iliosacral screw insertion by computer-assisted navigation gradually became the main technique in some hospitals, but the expensive price limited the extensive application. But other techniques such as 3D printed template was used to place iliosacral screw as novel method. This study was to compare the efficiency of percutaneous iliosacral screw placement by using patient-specific template and computer-assisted navigation.

METHODS

Total of 58 patients from September 2017 to September 2021 with sacral injury were treated operatively with percutaneous screw technique, which was selected for this retrospective analysis and divided into two groups (template and computer-assisted navigation). There were 31 patients in template group and 27 patients in computer-assisted navigation group. The surgical details (operation time, blood loss, number of screw placements, and number of fluoroscopies), complications, radiographic and clinical results were recorded. The quality of reduction was assessed by the Matta scoring system. T-test and rank-sum test was used in this study.

RESULTS

Operation time in template group was less (33.97 ± 16.61 < 60.31 ± 11.46 min, p < 0.01), but the preoperative preparation time was more (6.35 ± 1.60 > 5.41 ± 1.58, p < 0.05). The quality of reduction in both groups was no difference (p = 0.352). A patient was complicated with gluteal vessel injury in operation in navigation group, which was treated with ligation, but the same injury was not observed in template group. The related surgical data of patient with gluteal injury was ignored in statistical analysis.

CONCLUSION

Both of the two techniques could improve surgical efficiency, the operation time in template was less than computer-assisted navigation group, but the preoperative preparation time was more.