1
|
Bijker L, Scholten-Peeters GGM, Donker MH, Coppieters MW, Cuijpers P, Busink V, Poolman EY, de Wit LM. 'Leaving my comfort zone'. A qualitative study of physiotherapists' experiences blending an eHealth psychosocial intervention with face-to-face physiotherapy. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2024; 73:103121. [PMID: 38936263 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many physiotherapists do not feel adequately equipped to address psychosocial risk factors in people with complex pain states. Hence, a biopsychosocial blended intervention (Back2Action) was developed to assist physiotherapists to manage people with persistent spinal pain and coexisting psychosocial risk factors associated with the development or maintenance of persistent pain. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to gain insight into the experiences of physiotherapists with this blended psychosocial intervention. DESIGN and methods: This was an interpretative qualitative study with a reflexive thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with physiotherapists (N = 15) who delivered Back2Action. The interview started with the grand-tour question: "What was your experience in using Back2Action?" Physiotherapist were encouraged to provide examples, and follow-up questions were posed to ensure a deeper understanding could be reached. RESULTS Four themes were constructed: Physiotherapists became increasingly aware of (1) their own implicit expectations, biases and skills, and underlying treatment paradigms, and (2) the implicit expectations from their patients towards them. This led to (3) creating a deeper and stronger therapeutic alliance with the patient, but also (4) an understanding that implementation of a true biopsychosocial intervention - even if offered in a blended form - requires more practice, confidence and resources. CONCLUSIONS Back2Action is considered a valuable treatment to deliver a biopsychosocial intervention in primary care. Considering the high level of knowledge, skills and competency of the participating physiotherapists, the perceived barriers may be more difficult to overcome for more junior physiotherapists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Bijker
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Program Musculoskeletal Health, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - G G M Scholten-Peeters
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Program Musculoskeletal Health, the Netherlands.
| | - M H Donker
- Department of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - M W Coppieters
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Program Musculoskeletal Health, the Netherlands; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane & Gold Coast, Australia.
| | - P Cuijpers
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - V Busink
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E Y Poolman
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Program Musculoskeletal Health, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - L M de Wit
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hurmuz-Bodde MZ, Jansen-Kosterink SM, Hermens HJ, van Velsen L. Attrition of older adults in web-based health interventions: Survival analysis within an observational cohort study. J Health Psychol 2024:13591053241274097. [PMID: 39276083 DOI: 10.1177/13591053241274097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/16/2024] Open
Abstract
To identify demographics and personal motivation types that predict dropping out of eHealth interventions among older adults. We conducted an observational cohort study. Participants completed a pre-test questionnaire and got access to an eHealth intervention, called Stranded, for 4 weeks. With survival and Cox-regression analyses, demographics and types of personal motivation were identified that affect drop-out. Ninety older adults started using Stranded. 45.6% participants continued their use for 4 weeks. 32.2% dropped out in the first week and 22.2% dropped out in the second or third week. The final multivariate Cox-regression model which predicts drop-out, consisted of the variables: perceived computer skills and level of external regulation. Predicting the chance of dropping out of an eHealth intervention is possible by using level of self-perceived computer skills and level of external regulation (externally controlled rewards or punishments direct behaviour). Anticipating to these factors can improve eHealth adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian Zm Hurmuz-Bodde
- Roessingh Research and Development, The Netherlands
- University of Twente, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hermie J Hermens
- Roessingh Research and Development, The Netherlands
- University of Twente, The Netherlands
| | - Lex van Velsen
- Roessingh Research and Development, The Netherlands
- University of Twente, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lappalainen P, Keinonen K, Lappalainen R, Selinheimo S, Vuokko A, Sainio M, Liesto S, Tolvanen A, Paunio T. Online acceptance and commitment therapy (iACT) for adults with persistent physical symptoms - 3-month follow-up study of a randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res 2024; 183:111830. [PMID: 38878337 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Persistent physical symptoms (PPS) represent a major health problem affecting daily functioning. This RCT aimed to examine whether a guided Internet-based treatment based on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) provided additional benefits compared to Treatment as Usual (TAU) in reducing somatic complaints and psychological distress in adults with PPS. METHODS A total of 103 adults with PPS related to indoor environments, chronic fatigue or both conditions were assigned to receive either either a 14-week intervention (video-based case conceptualization + Internet-based ACT) combined with TAU (iACT + TAU; n = 50) or TAU alone (n = 53). Somatic symptoms, depression, anxiety, insomnia, and psychological flexibility were assessed from pre-intervention to a 3-month follow-up. Additionally, the association between changes in psychological flexibility from pre- to post-intervention and changes in symptoms from pre to 3-month follow-up was explored. Analyses were conducted using a multigroup method with full information maximum likelihood estimator. RESULTS The results revealed a significant interaction effect, indicating reductions in somatic symptoms and symptoms of depression and anxiety with moderate to large between-group effects (d = 0.71-1.09). No significant interaction effect was observed in insomnia and measures of psychological flexibility. CONCLUSION Internet-based ACT, when combined with Treatment as Usual, demonstrated efficacy for individuals with PPS associated with indoor environments and chronic fatigue. These findings are pertinent for primary healthcare providers, suggesting that the current treatment model could serve as a low-threshold first-line treatment option. THE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04532827.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Aki Vuokko
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Markku Sainio
- Outpatient Clinic for Persistent Symptom Rehabilitation, HUS Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sanna Liesto
- Outpatient Clinic for Persistent Symptom Rehabilitation, HUS Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Asko Tolvanen
- Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Tiina Paunio
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Psychiatry and SleepWell Research Programme, Faculty of Medicine University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sanabria-Mazo JP, D'Amico F, Cardeñosa E, Ferrer M, Edo S, Borràs X, McCracken LM, Feliu-Soler A, Sanz A, Luciano JV. Economic Evaluation of Videoconference Group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Behavioral Activation Therapy for Depression Versus Usual Care Among Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain Plus Comorbid Depressive Symptoms. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2024; 25:104472. [PMID: 38242333 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.01.337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
Chronic pain and depression are frequently comorbid conditions associated with significant health care and social costs. This study examined the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of videoconference-based group forms of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Behavioral Activation Therapy for Depression (BATD), as a complement to treatment-as-usual (TAU), for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) plus depressive symptoms, compared to TAU alone. A trial-based economic evaluation (n = 234) was conducted from a governmental and health care perspective with a time horizon of 12 months. Primary outcomes were the Brief Pain Inventory-Interference Scale (BPI-IS) and Quality Adjusted Life Year. Compared to TAU, ACT achieved a significant reduction in total costs (d = .47), and BATD achieved significant reductions in indirect (d = .61) and total costs (d = .63). Significant improvements in BPI-IS (d = .73 and d = .66, respectively) and Quality Adjusted Life Year scores (d = .46 and d = .28, respectively) were found in ACT and BATD compared to TAU. No significant differences in costs and outcomes were found between ACT and BATD. In the intention-to-treat analyses, from the governmental and health care perspective, no significant differences in cost reduction and incremental effects were identified in the comparison between ACT, BATD, and TAU. However, in the complete case analysis, significant incremental effects of ACT (∆BPI-IS = -1.57 and -1.39, respectively) and BATD (∆BPI-IS = -1.08 and -1.04, respectively) compared with TAU were observed. In the per-protocol analysis, only the significant incremental effects of ACT (∆BPI-IS = -1.68 and -1.43, respectively) compared to TAU were detected. In conclusion, ACT and BATD might be efficient options in the management of CLBP plus comorbid depression symptoms as compared to usual care. However, no clear difference was found in the comparison between the 2 active therapies regarding cost-effectiveness or cost-utility. PERSPECTIVE: The economic evaluation of psychological therapies for the management of complex conditions can be used in decision-making and resource allocation. This study provides evidence that ACT and BATD are more effective and involve a greater reduction in costs than usual care in the management of CLBP plus comorbid depressive symptoms. TRIAL NUMBER: NCT04140838.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan P Sanabria-Mazo
- Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain; Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Francesco D'Amico
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eugenia Cardeñosa
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Basic Health Area (ABS) Maria Bernades, Direcció d'Atenció Primària Metropolitana Sud, Institut Català de la Salut, Viladecans, Spain
| | - Montse Ferrer
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Institut de Recerca Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sílvia Edo
- Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Xavier Borràs
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | | | - Albert Feliu-Soler
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Antoni Sanz
- Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Juan V Luciano
- Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain; Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
You DS, Chong JL, Mackey SC, Poupore-King H. Utilizing a learning health system to capture real-world patient data: Application of the reliable change index to evaluate and improve the outcome of a pain rehabilitation program. Pain Pract 2024; 24:856-865. [PMID: 38465804 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The learning healthcare system (LHS) has been developed to integrate patients' clinical data into clinical decisions and improve treatment outcomes. Having little guidance on this integration process, we aim to explain (a) an applicable analytic tool for clinicians to evaluate the clinical outcomes at a group and an individual level and (b) our quality improvement (QI) project, analyzing the outcomes of a new outpatient pain rehabilitation program ("Back-in-Action": BIA) and applying the analysis results to modify our clinical practice. METHODS Through our LHS (CHOIR; https://choir.stanford.edu), we administered the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMIS)® before and after BIA. After searching for appropriate analytic tools, we decided to use the Reliable Change Index (RCI) to determine if an observed change in the direction of better (improvement) or worse (deterioration) would be beyond or within the measurement error (no change). RESULTS Our RCI calculations revealed that at least a 9-point decrease in the PCS scores and 10-point increase in the CPAQ scores would indicate reliable improvement. RCIs for the PROMIS measures ranged from 5 to 8 T-score points (i.e., 0.5-0.8 SD). When evaluating change scores of the PCS, CPAQ, and PROMIS measures, we found that 94% of patients showed improvement in at least one domain after BIA and 6% showed no reliable improvement. CONCLUSIONS Our QI project revealed RCI as a useful tool to evaluate treatment outcomes at a group and an individual level, and RCI could be incorporated into the LHS to generate a progress report automatically for clinicians. We further explained how clinicians could use RCI results to modify a clinical practice, to improve the outcomes of a pain program, and to develop individualized care plans. Lastly, we suggested future research areas to improve the LHS application in pain practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dokyoung S You
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jeanette L Chong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Sean C Mackey
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Heather Poupore-King
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
López-Soler C, Vicente-Escudero JL, López-López JA, Alcántara M, Martínez A, Castro M, Fernández V, Sánchez-Meca J. Effectiveness of internet-delivered psychological treatments for children and adolescents with anxiety and/or depressive disorders: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Clin Health Psychol 2024; 24:100487. [PMID: 39114408 PMCID: PMC11304886 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Anxiety and depression symptomatology has increased in the child and adolescent population. Internet-delivered psychological treatments (IDPT) can help to reduce this symptomatology, attending to the largest possible population. Aim To conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis of IDPT to reduce anxiety and depression symptoms in children and adolescents. Methods The search for studies was conducted in SCOPUS, PsycINFO, PSICODOC, PsycARTICLES and Medline, between 2000 and 2022, in December 2022. Studies were selected if they were conducted with a sample of children and/or adolescents with previous symptoms of anxiety and depression, had applied IDPT, and included at least two comparative groups with pretest-posttest measures. Network meta-analyses were separately performed for anxiety and depression outcomes. Publication bias was analyzed using Egger's test and funnel plots, and mixed-effects meta-regression models were applied to account for heterogeneity. Results 37 studies were included in the meta-analysis, providing a total of 74 comparative groups. IDPT exhibited low-to-moderate, statistically significant average effect sizes when compared to both inactive and active controls. No statistical significance was found when IDPT was compared with other types of interventions. Discussion IDPT is recommended to reduce anxiety and depression symptomatology in children and adolescents, but more studies are needed which compare treatments with other types of interventions, such as face-to-face therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Concepción López-Soler
- Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, University of Murcia, Espinardo Campus, 31, Murcia, Spain
| | - Jose Luis Vicente-Escudero
- Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, University of Murcia, Espinardo Campus, 31, Murcia, Spain
| | - Jose Antonio López-López
- Department of Basic Psychology and Methodology, University of Murcia, Espinardo Campus, 31, Murcia Spain
| | - Mavi Alcántara
- Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, University of Murcia, Espinardo Campus, 31, Murcia, Spain
| | - Antonia Martínez
- Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, University of Murcia, Espinardo Campus, 31, Murcia, Spain
| | - Maravillas Castro
- Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, University of Murcia, Espinardo Campus, 31, Murcia, Spain
| | - Visitación Fernández
- Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, University of Murcia, Espinardo Campus, 31, Murcia, Spain
| | - Julio Sánchez-Meca
- Department of Basic Psychology and Methodology, University of Murcia, Espinardo Campus, 31, Murcia Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Delage N, Cantagrel N, Soriot-Thomas S, Frost M, Deleens R, Ginies P, Eschalier A, Corteval A, Laveyssière A, Phalip J, Bertin C, Pereira B, Chenaf C, Doreau B, Authier N, Kerckhove N. Mobile Health App and Web Platform (eDOL) for Medical Follow-Up of Patients With Chronic Pain: Cohort Study Involving the French eDOL National Cohort After 1 Year. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024; 12:e54579. [PMID: 38865173 PMCID: PMC11208841 DOI: 10.2196/54579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain affects approximately 30% of the general population, severely degrades quality of life and professional life, and leads to additional health care costs. Moreover, the medical follow-up of patients with chronic pain remains complex and provides only fragmentary data on painful daily experiences. This situation makes the management of patients with chronic pain less than optimal and may partly explain the lack of effectiveness of current therapies. Real-life monitoring of subjective and objective markers of chronic pain using mobile health (mHealth) programs could better characterize patients, chronic pain, pain medications, and daily impact to help medical management. OBJECTIVE This cohort study aimed to assess the ability of our mHealth tool (eDOL) to collect extensive real-life medical data from chronic pain patients after 1 year of use. The data collected in this way would provide new epidemiological and pathophysiological data on chronic pain. METHODS A French national cohort of patients with chronic pain treated at 18 pain clinics has been established and followed up using mHealth tools. This cohort makes it possible to collect the determinants and repercussions of chronic pain and their evolutions in a real-life context, taking into account all environmental events likely to influence chronic pain. The patients were asked to complete several questionnaires, body schemes, and weekly meters, and were able to interact with a chatbot and use educational modules on chronic pain. Physicians could monitor their patients' progress in real time via an online platform. RESULTS The cohort study included 1427 patients and analyzed 1178 patients. The eDOL tool was able to collect various sociodemographic data; specific data for characterizing pain disorders, including body scheme; data on comorbidities related to chronic pain and its psychological and overall impact on patients' quality of life; data on drug and nondrug therapeutics and their benefit-to-risk ratio; and medical or treatment history. Among the patients completing weekly meters, 49.4% (497/1007) continued to complete them after 3 months of follow-up, and the proportion stabilized at 39.3% (108/275) after 12 months of follow-up. Overall, despite a fairly high attrition rate over the follow-up period, the eDOL tool collected extensive data. This amount of data will increase over time and provide a significant volume of health data of interest for future research involving the epidemiology, care pathways, trajectories, medical management, sociodemographic characteristics, and other aspects of patients with chronic pain. CONCLUSIONS This work demonstrates that the mHealth tool eDOL is able to generate a considerable volume of data concerning the determinants and repercussions of chronic pain and their evolutions in a real-life context. The eDOL tool can incorporate numerous parameters to ensure the detailed characterization of patients with chronic pain for future research and pain management. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04880096; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04880096.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noémie Delage
- Centre d'évaluation et de Traitement de la douleur, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Nathalie Cantagrel
- Centre d'évaluation et de Traitement de la douleur, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Marie Frost
- Centre d'évaluation et de Traitement de la douleur, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Rodrigue Deleens
- Centre d'évaluation et de Traitement de la douleur, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Patrick Ginies
- Centre d'évaluation et de Traitement de la douleur, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | - Jules Phalip
- Analgesia Institute, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Service de pharmacologie médicale, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Célian Bertin
- Service de pharmacologie médicale, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Bruno Pereira
- Direction de la recherche clinique et de l'innovation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Chouki Chenaf
- Service de pharmacologie médicale, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Bastien Doreau
- Laboratoire d'Informatique, de Modélisation et d'Optimisation des Systèmes, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Nicolas Authier
- Service de pharmacologie médicale, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Nicolas Kerckhove
- Service de pharmacologie médicale, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hurmuz MZM, Jansen-Kosterink SM, Mork PJ, Bach K, Hermens HJ. Factors influencing the use of an artificial intelligence-based app (selfBACK) for tailored self-management support among adults with neck and/or low back pain. Disabil Rehabil 2024:1-10. [PMID: 38853677 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2361811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tailored self-management support is recommended as first-line treatment for neck and low back pain, for which mHealth applications could be promising. However, there is limited knowledge about factors influencing the engagement with such apps. The aim of this study was to assess barriers and facilitators for engaging with a self-management mHealth app among adults suffering from neck and/or low back pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS We carried out a qualitative descriptive study among adults with neck and/or low back pain. The artificial intelligence-based selfBACK app supports tailored self-management of neck and low back pain and was used for 6 weeks. After these 6 weeks, participants were interviewed by phone. RESULTS Thirty-two adults (17 males) with neck and/or low back pain participated (mean age = 54.9 (SD = 15.8)). Our results show that the mode of delivery and the novelty of the selfBACK app were perceived most often as a barrier to use the app. The action plans of the app and health-related factors were perceived most often as facilitating factors. CONCLUSIONS This study provides insight into possible strategies to improve an mHealth service. Furthermore, it shows that adults with neck and/or low back pain are willing and ready to receive blended treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Z M Hurmuz
- Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Biomedical Signal and Systems group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - S M Jansen-Kosterink
- Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Biomedical Signal and Systems group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - P J Mork
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - K Bach
- Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - H J Hermens
- Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Biomedical Signal and Systems group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ang DC, Davuluri S, Kaplan S, Keefe F, Rini C, Miles C, Chen H. Duloxetine and cognitive behavioral therapy with phone-based support for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: study protocol of the PRECICE randomized control trial. Trials 2024; 25:330. [PMID: 38762720 PMCID: PMC11102257 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08158-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is the most common, disabling, and costly of all pain conditions. While evidence exists for the efficacy of both duloxetine and web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as monotherapy, there is a clear need to consider study of treatment components that may complement each other. In addition, given the reported association between patient's adherence and treatment outcomes, strategies are needed to enhance participant's motivation to adopt and maintain continued use of newly learned pain coping skills from CBT. METHODS Two hundred eighty participants will be recruited from the primary care clinics of a large academic health care system in North Carolina. Participants with CMP will be randomized to one of three treatment arms: (1) combination treatment (duloxetine + web-based self-guided CBT) with phone-based motivational interviewing (MI), (2) combination treatment without phone-based MI, and (3) duloxetine monotherapy. Participants will be in the study for 24 weeks and will be assessed at baseline, week 13, and week 25. The primary outcome is the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-Global Pain Severity score, which combines BPI pain severity and BPI pain interference. Secondary measures include between-group comparisons in mean BPI pain severity and BPI pain interference scores. Data collection and outcome assessment will be blinded to treatment group assignment. DISCUSSION This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will determine if combination treatment with duloxetine and web-based CBT is superior to duloxetine monotherapy for the management of CMP. Furthermore, this RCT will determine the effectiveness of phone-based motivational interviewing in promoting the continued practice of pain coping skills, thereby enhancing treatment outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04395001 ClinicalTrials.gov. Registered on May 15, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis C Ang
- Department of Medicine/Rheumatology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
| | - Swetha Davuluri
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Sebastian Kaplan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Francis Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christine Rini
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christopher Miles
- Department of Family Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Haiying Chen
- Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yoshino A, Yokoyama S, Kurata A, Nakamura R, Nagami T, Taguchi S, Yamawaki S. Clinical effects of online cognitive behavioral group therapy for chronic pain patients and developing a therapeutic alliance: A pre-post pilot trial. Health Sci Rep 2024; 7:e2141. [PMID: 38784247 PMCID: PMC11112632 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Research suggests that various psychosocial factors influence chronic pain, with psychotherapies like cognitive behavioral therapy proving effective. However, the limited availability and accessibility have prolonged suffering among patients with chronic pain. This challenge has led to a growing demand for accessible online interventions. We developed an online cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT) program, building upon our existing face-to-face CBGT program. We compared the scores obtained by patients during the treatment-as-usual (TAU) period with those collected at the beginning and at the end of the intervention. Methods Patients with chronic pain (N = 22) agreed to participate in the online CBGT program, which was conducted once a week for 12 sessions. The sample size was decided based on the effect sizes of our past face-to-face CBGT. We assessed pain intensity [Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)], pain catastrophizing [pain catastrophizing scale (PCS)] and psychiatric assessment [Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI)-II], State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at three points: entry, pretreatment, and posttreatment. We also evaluated the participants' therapeutic alliance with the treatment staff [short-form version of the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-S)]. We utilized analyses of variance, Friedman test, paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Pearson correlation analysis for data evaluation. Results Results indicated a significant posttreatment improvement in VAS, PCS, and BDI-II scores compared to the TAU period. Furthermore, posttreatment WAI-S scores increased significantly compared to pretreatment scores. Also, positive correlations were observed among pre- and posttreatment changes in WAI-S, pain intensity, and pain catastrophizing scores. Conclusion There is a possibility that a therapeutic alliance can be established, and therapeutic effects achieved through an online CBGT intervention; however, additional research is required to substantiate this potential. We have registered this clinical trial in UMIN-CTR on 04/21/2021 with the number UMIN000043982.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsuo Yoshino
- Health Service CenterHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
- Center for Brain, Mind and KANSEI Sciences ResearchHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | | | - Akiko Kurata
- Department of Psychiatry and NeurosciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Ryuji Nakamura
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical CareHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | | | - Shima Taguchi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical CareHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
- Department of AnesthesiologyShimura HospitalHiroshimaJapan
| | - Shigeto Yamawaki
- Center for Brain, Mind and KANSEI Sciences ResearchHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kelly M, Fullen BM, Martin D, Bradley C, McVeigh JG. eHealth interventions to support self-management: Perceptions and experiences of people with musculoskeletal disorders and physiotherapists - 'eHealth: It's TIME': A qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract 2024; 40:1011-1021. [PMID: 36426843 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2151334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing interest in the potential role of eHealth interventions to support self-management in people with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). The COVID-19 pandemic appears to have been a significant catalyst for the implementation of eHealth modalities into routine practice, providing a unique opportunity for real-world evaluation of this underutilized method of delivering physiotherapy. OBJECTIVE To explore the perceptions of eHealth-mediated supported self-management from the perspective of people with MSDs and physiotherapists who work in this clinical area. METHODS A qualitative interpretive descriptive approach was used. Semi-structured telephone interviews with 13 musculoskeletal physiotherapists and 13 people with musculoskeletal disorders were undertaken. Transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS Three main themes were identified: 1) Flexibility within a blended care model; 2) eHealth as a facilitator of self-management support; and 3) Technology: Getting it right. Participants expressed concerns about assessment and diagnosis, establishing a therapeutic relationship and felt eHealth should be reserved for follow-up purposes. There was a consistent view expressed that eHealth could facilitate aspects of self-management support. A lack of resources and suboptimal user experience remains a challenge. CONCLUSIONS eHealth-mediated self-management support interventions were broadly acceptably, predominately as a follow-up option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Kelly
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Therapies, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- Department of Physiotherapy, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Brona M Fullen
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Denis Martin
- School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Colin Bradley
- Department of General Practice, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Joseph G McVeigh
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Therapies, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ang DC, Davuluri S, Kaplan S, Keefe F, Rini C, Miles C, Chen H. Duloxetine and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with Phone-based Support for the Treatment of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Study Protocol of the PRECICE Randomized Control Trial. RESEARCH SQUARE 2024:rs.3.rs-3924330. [PMID: 38699346 PMCID: PMC11065058 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3924330/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
Background Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is the most common, disabling, and costly of all pain conditions. While evidence exists for the efficacy of both duloxetine and web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as monotherapy, there is a clear need to consider study of treatment components that may complement each other. In addition, given the reported association between patient's adherence and treatment outcomes, strategies are needed to enhance participant's motivation to adopt and maintain continued use of newly learned pain coping skills from CBT. Methods Two hundred eighty participants will be recruited from the primary care clinics of a large academic health care system in North Carolina. Participants with CMP will be randomized to one of 3 treatment arms: (1) combination treatment (duloxetine + web-based self-guided CBT) with phone-based motivational interviewing (MI), (2) combination treatment without phone-based MI and (3) duloxetine monotherapy. Participants will be in the study for 24 weeks and will be assessed at baseline, week 13, and week 25. The primary outcome is the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-Global Pain Severity score, which combines BPI pain severity and BPI pain interference. Secondary measures include between-group comparisons in mean BPI pain severity and BPI pain interference scores. Data collection and outcome assessment will be blinded to treatment group assignment. Discussion This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will determine if combination treatment with duloxetine and web-based CBT is superior to duloxetine monotherapy for the management of CMP. Furthermore, this RCT will determine the effectiveness of phone-based motivational interviewing in promoting the continued practice of pain coping skills; thereby, enhancing treatment outcomes. Trial Registration NCT04395001. Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on May 15, 2020.
Collapse
|
13
|
Day MA, Ciol MA, Mendoza ME, Borckardt J, Ehde DM, Newman AK, Chan JF, Drever SA, Friedly JL, Burns J, Thorn BE, Jensen MP. The effects of telehealth-delivered mindfulness meditation, cognitive therapy, and behavioral activation for chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Med 2024; 22:156. [PMID: 38609994 PMCID: PMC11015654 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03383-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a significant problem affecting millions of people worldwide. Three widely implemented psychological techniques used for CLBP management are cognitive therapy (CT), mindfulness meditation (MM), and behavioral activation (BA). This study aimed to evaluate the relative immediate (pre- to post-treatment) and longer term (pre-treatment to 3- and 6-month follow-ups) effects of group, videoconference-delivered CT, BA, and MM for CLBP. METHODS This is a secondary analysis of a three-arm, randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of three active treatments-CT, BA, and MM-with no inert control condition. Participants were N = 302 adults with CLBP, who were randomized to condition. The primary outcome was pain interference, and other secondary outcomes were also examined. The primary study end-point was post-treatment. Intent-to-treat analyses were undertaken for each time point, with the means of the changes in outcomes compared among the three groups using an analysis of variance (ANOVA). Effect sizes and confidence intervals are also reported. RESULTS Medium-to-large effect size reductions in pain interference were found within BA, CT, and MM (ds from - .71 to - 1.00), with gains maintained at both follow-up time points. Effect sizes were generally small to medium for secondary outcomes for all three conditions (ds from - .20 to - .71). No significant between-group differences in means or changes in outcomes were found at any time point, except for change in sleep disturbance from pre- to post-treatment, improving more in BA than MM (d = - .49). CONCLUSIONS The findings from this trial, one of the largest telehealth trials of psychological treatments to date, critically determined that group, videoconference-delivered CT, BA, and MM are effective for CLBP and can be implemented in clinical practice to improve treatment access. The pattern of results demonstrated similar improvements across treatments and outcome domains, with effect sizes consistent with those observed in prior research testing in-person delivered and multi-modal psychological pain treatments. Thus, internet treatment delivery represents a tool to scale up access to evidence-based chronic pain treatments and to overcome widespread disparities in healthcare. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03687762.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A Day
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, 330 McElwain Building, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Marcia A Ciol
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - M Elena Mendoza
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Borckardt
- Departments of Psychiatry, Anesthesia, and Stomatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Dawn M Ehde
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrea K Newman
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joy F Chan
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sydney A Drever
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Janna L Friedly
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John Burns
- Department of Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Beverly E Thorn
- Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
| | - Mark P Jensen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Javier SJ, Carey EP, Gunzburger E, Chen HYP, Zeliadt SB, Williams EC, Chen JA. Pain Care Disparities and the Use of Virtual Care Among Racial-Ethnic Minority Groups During COVID-19. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:68-78. [PMID: 38252245 PMCID: PMC10937888 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08473-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE COVID-19 led to an unprecedented reliance on virtual modalities to maintain care continuity for patients living with chronic pain. We examined whether there were disparities in virtual specialty pain care for racial-ethnic minority groups during COVID-19. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS This was a retrospective national cohort study with two comparison groups: primary care patients with chronic pain seen immediately prior to COVID-19 (3/1/19-2/29/20) (N = 1,649,053) and a cohort of patients seen in the year prior (3/1/18-2/28-19; n = 1,536,954). MAIN MEASURES We assessed use of telehealth (telephone or video) specialty pain care, in-person care specialty pain care, and any specialty pain care for both groups at 6 months following cohort inclusion. We used quasi-Poisson regressions to test associations between patient race and ethnicity and receipt of care. KEY RESULTS Prior to COVID-19, there were Black-White (RR = 0.64, 95% CI [0.62, 0.67]) and Asian-White (RR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.54, 0.75]) disparities in telehealth use, and these lessened during COVID-19 (Black-White: RR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.73, 0.77], Asian-White: RR = 0.81, 95% CI [0.74, 0.89]) but did not disappear. Individuals identifying as American Indian/Alaska Native used telehealth less than White individuals during early COVID-19 (RR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.85, 1.13] to RR = 0.87, 95% CI [0.79, 0.96]). Hispanic/Latinx individuals were less likely than non-Hispanic/Latinx individuals to use telehealth prior to COVID-19 but more likely during early COVID-19 (RR = 0.70, 95% CI [0.66, 0.75] to RR = 1.06, 95% CI [1.02, 1.09]). Disparities in virtual pain care occurred over the backdrop of overall decreased specialty pain care during the early phase of the pandemic (raw decrease of n = 17,481 specialty care encounters overall from pre-COVID to COVID-era), including increased disparities in any VA specialty pain care for Black (RR = 0.81, 95% CI [0.80, 0.83] to RR = 0.79, 95% CI [0.77, 0.80]) and Asian (RR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.86, 0.97] to RR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.82, 0.94]) individuals. CONCLUSIONS Disparities in virtual specialty pain care were smaller during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic than prior to the pandemic but did not disappear entirely, despite the rapid growth in telehealth. Targeted efforts to increase access to specialty pain care need to be concentrated among racial-ethnic minority groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J Javier
- Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, 795 Willow Road (152-MPD), Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Evan P Carey
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Elise Gunzburger
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Huang-Yuan P Chen
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Steven B Zeliadt
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Emily C Williams
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jessica A Chen
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bendelin N, Gerdle B, Andersson G. Hurdles and potentials when implementing internet-delivered Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a retrospective appraisal using the Quality implementation framework. Scand J Pain 2024; 24:sjpain-2022-0139. [PMID: 37855128 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2022-0139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Internet-delivered psychological interventions can be regarded as evidence-based practices and have been implemented in psychiatric and somatic care at primary and specialist levels. However, challenges as low adherence and poor routinization, have arisen during attempts to implement internet-delivered interventions in chronic pain settings. Internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (IACT) has been found to be helpful for chronic pain patients and might aid in developing pain rehabilitation services. However, the integration of IACT into standard health care has not yet been described from an implementation science perspective. The aim of this hybrid 1 effectiveness-implementation study was to evaluate the process of implementing IACT in a pain rehabilitation setting, to guide future implementation initiatives. METHODS In this retrospective study we described actions taken during an implementation initiative, in which IACT was delivered as part of an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (IPRP) at a specialist level clinic. All documents relevant to the study were reviewed and coded using the Quality Improvement Framework (QIF), focusing on adoption, appropriateness and sustainability. RESULTS The QIF-analysis of implementation actions resulted in two categories: facilitators and challenges for implementation. Sustainability may be facilitated by sensitivity to the changing needs of a clinical setting and challenged by unfitting capacity building. Appropriateness might be challenged by an insufficient needs assessment and facilitated by aligning routines for communication with the clinic's existing infrastructure. Adoption may be facilitated by staff key champions and an ability to adapt to occurring hurdles. Possible influential factors, hypotheses and key process challenges are presented in a logic model to guide future initiatives. CONCLUSIONS Sustainable implementation may depend on both the continuity of facilitating implementation actions and flexibility to the changing needs and interests of patients, caregivers and organization. We conclude that the use of theories, models and frameworks (TMF) as well as a logic model may ease design, planning and evaluation of an implementation process. Lastly, we suggest that IACT may be appropriate for IPRP when given before or after IPRP, focusing on psychiatric comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Bendelin
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Björn Gerdle
- Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Gerhard Andersson
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fisher L, Fortmann A, Knaebel J, Stuhr A. Can a Basic Management App Paired With A Glucose Meter Help Reduce Glucose Levels Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes? The REALL Study. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024; 18:99-105. [PMID: 35533145 PMCID: PMC10899840 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221096163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluations of technology to help adults manage type 2 diabetes (T2D) have yielded mixed results. We analyzed the effectiveness of a free app linked to a glucose meter to study reductions in glucose levels over time among a self-selected sample of adults with T2D. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Adults with T2D >12 months, >21 years, ability to read English (insulin using-IU and non-insulin using-NIU) who independently elected to pair their CONTOUR NEXT ONE meter with the CONTOUR DIABETES App were invited to participate. Glucose data from baseline to 16 weeks were uploaded to the cloud (N = 461). Assessment of diabetes distress, medication taking, quality of life, and hypoglycemia concerns occurred at baseline, six, and 16 weeks. RESULTS Findings indicated a significant decrease in weekly glucose levels over time: baseline mean = 169 (62.0) (9.4 mmol/L; 3.44); 16-week mean = 146.5 (36.0) (8.1 mmol/L; 2.0) (P < .001), with no IU and NIU differences. Largest reductions occurred during the first six weeks, with no later rebound effects. Significant, though modest, improvements in global quality of life (P = .03), hypoglycemia concerns (P = .01), and diabetes distress (P < .001) occurred over 16 weeks. CONCLUSIONS Making an App for monitoring glucose easily available for download with a glucose meter can be helpful for self-selected adults with T2D. Effective utilization assumes that users are sufficiently motivated and engaged, are comfortable and trusting of the technology, and have sufficient knowledge of how to make use of the glucose data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence Fisher
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Addie Fortmann
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, Scripps Health, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sanabria-Mazo JP, Colomer-Carbonell A, Fernández-Vázquez Ó, Noboa-Rocamora G, Cardona-Ros G, McCracken LM, Montes-Pérez A, Castaño-Asins JR, Edo S, Borràs X, Sanz A, Feliu-Soler A, Luciano JV. A systematic review of cognitive behavioral therapy-based interventions for comorbid chronic pain and clinically relevant psychological distress. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1200685. [PMID: 38187407 PMCID: PMC10766814 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1200685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Chronic pain frequently co-occurs with clinically relevant psychological distress. A systematic review was conducted to identify the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy-based interventions for patients with these comorbid conditions. Methods The systematic search was carried out in Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus up to March 18th, 2023. Four reviewers independently conducted screenings, extraction, and quality assessment. Results Twelve randomized controlled trials and one non-randomized controlled trial involving 1,661 participants that examined the efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (nine studies), Mindfulness-based Interventions (three studies), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (one study), and Behavioral Activation Therapy for Depression (one study) were included. Compared to treatment as usual, six out of eight studies of traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy reported significant differences in the reduction of depressive symptoms at post-treatment (d from 1.31 to 0.18) and four out of six at follow-up (d from 0.75 to 0.26); similarly, five out of six reported significant differences in the reduction of anxiety symptoms at post-treatment (d from 1.08 to 0.19) and three out of four at follow-up (d from 1.07 to 0.27). Overall, no significant differences between traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and treatment as usual were reported at post-treatment and follow-up in the studies exploring pain intensity and pain catastrophizing. Conclusion The available evidence suggests that traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy may produce significant benefits for the improvement of depression, anxiety, and quality of life, but not for pain intensity and pain catastrophizing. More evidence is needed to determine the effects of MBI, ACT, and BATD. Systematic review registration PROSPERO, CRD42021219921.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan P. Sanabria-Mazo
- Teaching, Research, and Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
- Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ariadna Colomer-Carbonell
- Teaching, Research, and Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
- Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Óscar Fernández-Vázquez
- Teaching, Research, and Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Georgina Noboa-Rocamora
- Teaching, Research, and Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Cardona-Ros
- Teaching, Research, and Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Sílvia Edo
- Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Borràs
- Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Antoni Sanz
- Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Albert Feliu-Soler
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan V. Luciano
- Teaching, Research, and Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Huguet A, Rozario S, Wozney L, McGrath PJ. An Online Psychological Program for Adolescents and Young Adults With Headaches: Iterative Design and Rapid Usability Testing. JMIR Hum Factors 2023; 10:e48677. [PMID: 38085567 PMCID: PMC10751633 DOI: 10.2196/48677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Headache disorders are common, debilitating health problems. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is recommended but rarely easily available. With the use of the internet and communication technologies among youth and young adults, these individuals could be self-trained in CBT skills. There is an increasing number of internet-based interventions for headaches, but there has been little research into the usability of these interventions because evaluating usability across the intervention development life cycle is costly. We developed an internet-based CBT program, the Specialized Program for Headache Reduction (SPHERE). While developing it, we aimed to improve SPHERE through rapid usability testing cycles. OBJECTIVE This study aims to presents a rapid and affordable usability testing approach that can be performed throughout the intervention development life cycle. This paper also provides evidence of the usability of SPHERE. METHODS We used the "think aloud" usability testing method based on Krug's approach to test user interaction within a lab setting. This was followed by a short posttest interview. We planned to test SPHERE with 3-5 participants testing the same part of the program each cycle. Both the design and development team and the research team actively participated in the usability testing process. Observers independently identified the top 3 usability issues, rated their severity, and conducted debriefing sessions to come to consensus on major issues and generate potential solutions. RESULTS The testing process allowed major usability issues to be identified and rectified rapidly before piloting SPHERE in a real-world context. A total of 2 cycles of testing were conducted. Of the usability issues encountered in cycles 1 and 2, a total of 68% (17/25) and 32% (12/38), respectively, were rated as major, discussed, and fixed. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that rapid usability testing is an essential part of the design process that improves program functionality and can be easy and inexpensive to undertake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Huguet
- Department of Psychology, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
- Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | - Lori Wozney
- Mental Health and Addictions, Izaak Walton Killam Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Patrick J McGrath
- Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Buhrman M, Tillfors M, Holländare F, Lekström E, Håkansson A, Boersma K. Psychological Treatment Targeting Acceptance and Compassion in Patients With Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled, Internet-delivered, Treatment Trial. Clin J Pain 2023; 39:672-685. [PMID: 37712248 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Chronic pain is often associated with lower function. Self-criticism is associated with depressive symptoms. The purpose of this study was to explore if fusing Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and compassion-focused therapy could improve psychological well-being and disability in individuals with chronic pain with high levels of self-criticism in comparison to a wait-list control group. METHODS Individuals with chronic pain (n=71) were randomly assigned to an 8-week internet-based intervention focused on acceptance and compassion or a wait-list condition. Primary treatment outcomes were the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, Self-Compassion Scale, and Pain Disability Index. Secondary outcomes were the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Anxiety Sensitivity Index, Quality of Life Inventory, Multidimensional Pain Inventory, and Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire. RESULTS Missing data at postintervention were 22.5%. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted using linear mixed models. The results revealed greater levels of acceptance and self-compassion for the treatment group, which were primary outcomes, with effect sizes ranging from small to large, and these results were maintained at 6-month follow-up. The rates of clinically significant improvements were also greater for the treatment group in comparison to the wait-list control group on acceptance and compassion. The treatment group also improved in the third primary outcome, pain disability. Significant differences were found in several of the secondary outcomes, in favor of the treatment group. DISCUSSION Internet-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with compassion-focused therapy components shows promise as a viable treatment option in the management of chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria Tillfors
- Department of Social and Psychological Studies, Section of Psychology, Karlstad University, Karlstad
| | | | | | | | - Katja Boersma
- School of Medical Sciences
- Center for Health and Medical Psychology, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Scott W, Park C, Christopoulos G, Vogel S, Draper-Rodi J. [Remote management of musculoskeletal pain : A pragmatic approach to the implementation of video and phone consultations in musculoskeletal practice. German version]. Schmerz 2023; 37:360-371. [PMID: 35834004 PMCID: PMC9281242 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-022-00659-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Remote consultations through phone or video are gaining in importance for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain across a range of health care providers. However, there is a plethora of technical options for practitioners to choose from, and there are various challenges in the adaptation of clinical processes as well as several special considerations regarding regulatory context and patient management. Practitioners are faced with a lack of high-quality peer-reviewed resources to guide the planning and practical implementation of remote consultations. OBJECTIVES This Clinical Update seeks to provide practical guidance for the planning and implementation of remote consultations for the management and treatment of people with musculoskeletal pain. METHODS Recommendations are based on a brief overview of the relevant research regarding phone and video consultations for musculoskeletal practice and derived from the literature, relevant guidelines, and practical experience. RESULTS The technical feasibility of remote consultations for musculoskeletal complaints is good, patient satisfaction is high, and a growing body of evidence supports its comparative effectiveness to in-person consultations in some circumstances for improving pain and functioning. We consider in detail practical aspects such as the choosing of hardware and software, we touch on the legal and regulatory context, and we focus on the adaptation of clinical processes and communication. CONCLUSION This Clinical Update draws together best-practice evidence in a practically applicable format, enabling therapists who are working with people with pain to directly apply this knowledge to their individual clinical settings and the requirements of their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Hohenschurz-Schmidt
- Department, Surgery and Cancer, Pain Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, 4th Floor, 369 Fulham Road, SW10 9NH, London, Großbritannien.
| | - Whitney Scott
- Psychology Department, Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, Großbritannien
- INPUT Pain Management Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, Großbritannien
| | - Charlie Park
- IPRS Triage and Remote Management Team, IPRS Health Limited, Little Blakenham, Suffolk, Großbritannien
| | - Georgios Christopoulos
- First Contact Practitioner, MSc Neuromusculoskeletal Care, BSc (Hons) Physiotherapy, HCPC CSP, Staffordshire, Großbritannien
| | - Steven Vogel
- Research Centre, University College of Osteopathy, London, Großbritannien
| | - Jerry Draper-Rodi
- Research Centre, University College of Osteopathy, London, Großbritannien
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hollyfield S, Travers W, Sondh SK, Wilczek A, Jacobs C, McCracken LM, Scott W. An Observational Study of Outcomes Associated With Virtual Pain Management Programs Based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Implemented During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Clin J Pain 2023; 39:524-536. [PMID: 37449794 PMCID: PMC10498868 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In response to COVID-19, virtual, group-based interdisciplinary pain management programs (PMPs) were rapidly implemented. This included implementing different intensities and formats of virtual PMPs to address a range of patient needs and complexity. This observational study investigated outcomes associated with virtual high and low-intensity and pre-neuromodulation PMPs based on acceptance and commitment therapy as part of routine care during the pandemic. METHODS Depending on patients' needs, participants completed a virtual high-intensity or low-intensity PMP, or a virtual PMP in preparation for neuromodulation, from June 2020 to June 2022. Participants completed standardized measures of pain intensity and interference, work and social adjustment, depression, and pain acceptance before and after treatment. Data from 2018 to 2019 for in-person residential ( n= 561), outpatient ( n =123), and pre-neuromodulation ( n =207) PMPs were also examined to provide a historical benchmark of performance. RESULTS The virtual high-intensity PMP ( n =294) showed significant improvements in all variables, with small effects. There were significant improvements with small effects for pain interference, depression, and acceptance for the virtual pre-neuromodulation PMP ( n =129). No statistically significant improvements were observed for the virtual low-intensity PMP ( n =90). The improvements associated with prepandemic in-person PMPs were generally larger relative to the virtual PMPs of comparable intensity delivered during the pandemic. DISCUSSION These data provide preliminary support for the potential benefits of high, but not low, intensity virtual acceptance and commitment therapy-based PMPs, including in the context of neuromodulation. Research is needed to maximize the impact of virtual PMPs and match patients with the most appropriate delivery format.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Warren Travers
- INPUT Pain Management Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - Angelika Wilczek
- INPUT Pain Management Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Clair Jacobs
- INPUT Pain Management Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - Whitney Scott
- INPUT Pain Management Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust
- King’s College London, Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Harrer M, Ebert DD, Kuper P, Paganini S, Schlicker S, Terhorst Y, Reuter B, Sander LB, Baumeister H. Predicting heterogeneous treatment effects of an Internet-based depression intervention for patients with chronic back pain: Secondary analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Internet Interv 2023; 33:100634. [PMID: 37635949 PMCID: PMC10457531 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Depression is highly prevalent among individuals with chronic back pain. Internet-based interventions can be effective in treating and preventing depression in this patient group, but it is unclear who benefits most from this intervention format. Method In an analysis of two randomized trials (N = 504), we explored ways to predict heterogeneous treatment effects of an Internet-based depression intervention for patients with chronic back pain. Univariate treatment-moderator interactions were explored in a first step. Multilevel model-based recursive partitioning was then applied to develop a decision tree model predicting individualized treatment benefits. Results The average effect on depressive symptoms was d = -0.43 (95 % CI: -0.68 to -0.17; 9 weeks; PHQ-9). Using univariate models, only back pain medication intake was detected as an effect moderator, predicting higher effects. More complex interactions were found using recursive partitioning, resulting in a final decision tree with six terminal nodes. The model explained a large amount of variation (bootstrap-bias-corrected R2 = 45 %), with predicted subgroup-conditional effects ranging from di = 0.24 to -1.31. External validation in a pilot trial among patients on sick leave (N = 76; R2 = 33 %) pointed to the transportability of the model. Conclusions The studied intervention is effective in reducing depressive symptoms, but not among all chronic back pain patients. Predictions of the multivariate tree learning model suggest a pattern in which patients with moderate depression and relatively low pain self-efficacy benefit most, while no benefits arise when patients' self-efficacy is already high. If corroborated in further studies, the developed tree algorithm could serve as a practical decision-making tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Harrer
- Psychology & Digital Mental Health Care, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - David Daniel Ebert
- Psychology & Digital Mental Health Care, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Paula Kuper
- Psychology & Digital Mental Health Care, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
- Clinical Psychology, Institute for Psychology, Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sarah Paganini
- Department of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sports and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sandra Schlicker
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yannik Terhorst
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Benedikt Reuter
- Clinical Psychology, Institute for Psychology, Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department Humanmedizin, Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lasse B. Sander
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Harald Baumeister
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, University Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Haller K, Becker P, Niemeyer H, Boettcher J. Who benefits from guided internet-based interventions? A systematic review of predictors and moderators of treatment outcome. Internet Interv 2023; 33:100635. [PMID: 37449052 PMCID: PMC10336165 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
To our knowledge, no systematic review has been conducted on predictors or moderators of treatment outcome across diagnoses in guided internet-based interventions (IBIs) for adults. To identify who benefits from this specific format and therein inform future research on improving patient-treatment fit, we aimed to aggregate results of relevant studies. 2100 articles, identified by searching the databases PsycInfo, Ovid Medline, and Pubmed and through snowballing, were screened in April/May 2021 and October 2022. Risk of bias and intra- and interrater reliability were assessed. Variables were grouped by predictor category, then synthesized using vote counting based on direction of effect. N = 60 articles were included in the review. Grouping resulted in 88 predictors/moderators, of which adherence, baseline symptoms, education, age, and gender were most frequently assessed. Better adherence, treatment credibility, and working alliance emerged as conclusive predictors/moderators for better outcome, whereas higher baseline scores predicted more reliable change but higher post-treatment symptoms. Results of all other predictors/moderators were inconclusive or lacked data. Our review highlights that it is currently difficult to predict, across diagnoses, who will benefit from guided IBIs. Further rigorous research is needed to identify predictors and moderators based on a sufficient number of studies. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021242305.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrin Haller
- Clinical Psychological Interventions, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pauline Becker
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Helen Niemeyer
- Clinical Psychological Interventions, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johanna Boettcher
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lutsch AG, Baumeister H, Paganini S, Sander LB, Terhorst Y, Domhardt M. Mechanisms of change in digital cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in patients with chronic back pain: A mediation analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Behav Res Ther 2023; 168:104369. [PMID: 37531807 DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While there is evolving knowledge on change processes of digital cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in the treatment of depression, little is known about how these interventions produce therapeutic change in the comorbid constellation of chronic back pain (CBP). Here, we examined whether the effects of a digital intervention to treat depression in patients with CBP are mediated by three pain-related variables (i.e., pain self-efficacy, pain-related disability, pain intensity). METHODS This study is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial conducted in routine care at 82 orthopedic clinics across Germany. In total, 209 adults with CBP and diagnosed depression (SCID interview) were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 104) or treatment-as-usual (n = 105). Cross-lagged mediation models were estimated to investigate longitudinal mediation effects of putative mediators with depression symptom severity (PHQ-9) as primary outcome at post-treatment. RESULTS Longitudinal mediation effects were observed for pain self-efficacy (ß = -0.094, 95%-CI [-0.174, -0.014], p = 0.021) and pain-related disability (ß = -0.068, 95%-CI [-0.130, -0.001], p = 0.047). Furthermore, the hypothesized direction of the mediation effects was supported, reversed causation did not occur. Pain intensity did not reveal a mediation effect. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest a relevant role of pain self-efficacy and pain-related disability as change processes in the treatment of depression for patients with CBP in routine care. However, further research is needed to disclose potential reciprocal relationships of mediators, and to extend and specify our knowledge of the mechanisms of change in digital CBT for depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne G Lutsch
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Germany
| | - Harald Baumeister
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Germany
| | - Sarah Paganini
- Department of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sports and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lasse B Sander
- Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Yannik Terhorst
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Germany
| | - Matthias Domhardt
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rosser BA, Fisher E, Janjua S, Eccleston C, Keogh E, Duggan G. Psychological therapies delivered remotely for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 8:CD013863. [PMID: 37643992 PMCID: PMC10476013 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013863.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain (pain lasting three months or more) is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage. Common types (excluding headache) include back pain, fibromyalgia, and neuropathic pain. Access to traditional face-to-face therapies can be restricted by healthcare resources, geography, and cost. Remote technology-based delivery of psychological therapies has the potential to overcome treatment barriers. However, their therapeutic effectiveness compared to traditional delivery methods requires further investigation. OBJECTIVES To determine the benefits and harms of remotely-delivered psychological therapies compared to active control, waiting list, or treatment as usual for the management of chronic pain in adults. SEARCH METHODS We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO to 29 June 2022. We also searched clinical trials registers and reference lists. We conducted a citation search of included trials to identify any further eligible trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included RCTs in adults (≥ 18 years old) with chronic pain. Interventions included psychological therapies with recognisable psychotherapeutic content or based on psychological theory. Trials had to have delivered therapy remote from the therapist (e.g. Internet, smartphone application) and involve no more than 30% contact time with a clinician. Comparators included treatment as usual (including waiting-list controls) and active controls (e.g. education). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. MAIN RESULTS We included 32 trials (4924 participants) in the analyses. Twenty-five studies delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to participants, and seven delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). Participants had back pain, musculoskeletal pain, opioid-treated chronic pain, mixed chronic pain, hip or knee osteoarthritis, spinal cord injury, fibromyalgia, provoked vestibulodynia, or rheumatoid arthritis. We assessed 25 studies as having an unclear or high risk of bias for selective reporting. However, across studies overall, risk of bias was generally low. We downgraded evidence certainty for primary outcomes for inconsistency, imprecision, and study limitations. Certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low. Adverse events were inadequately reported or recorded across studies. We report results only for studies in CBT here. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) versus treatment as usual (TAU) Pain intensity Immediately after treatment, CBT likely demonstrates a small beneficial effect compared to TAU (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.39 to -0.16; 20 studies, 3206 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Participants receiving CBT are probably more likely to achieve a 30% improvement in pain intensity compared to TAU (23% versus 11%; risk ratio (RR) 2.15, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.85; 5 studies, 1347 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). They may also be more likely to achieve a 50% improvement in pain intensity (6% versus 2%; RR 2.31, 95% CI 1.14 to 4.66; 4 studies, 1229 participants), but the evidence is of low certainty. At follow-up, there is likely little to no difference in pain intensity between CBT and TAU (SMD -0.04, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.09; 8 studies, 959 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence comparing CBT to TAU on achieving a 30% improvement in pain is very uncertain (40% versus 24%; RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.53; 1 study, 69 participants). No evidence was available regarding a 50% improvement in pain. Functional disability Immediately after treatment, CBT may demonstrate a small beneficial improvement compared to TAU (SMD -0.38, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.22; 14 studies, 2672 participants; low-certainty evidence). At follow-up, there is likely little to no difference between treatments (SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.23 to 0.14; 3 studies, 461 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Quality of life Immediately after treatment, CBT may not have resulted in a beneficial effect on quality of life compared to TAU, but the evidence is very uncertain (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.11; 7 studies, 1423 participants). There is likely little to no difference between CBT and TAU on quality of life at follow-up (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.05; 3 studies, 352 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events Immediately after treatment, evidence about the number of people experiencing adverse events is very uncertain (34% in TAU versus 6% in CBT; RR 6.00, 95% CI 2.2 to 16.40; 1 study, 140 participants). No evidence was available at follow-up. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) versus active control Pain intensity Immediately after treatment, CBT likely demonstrates a small beneficial effect compared to active control (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.04; 3 studies, 261 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence at follow-up is very uncertain (mean difference (MD) 0.50, 95% CI -0.30 to 1.30; 1 study, 127 participants). No evidence was available for a 30% or 50% pain intensity improvement. Functional disability Immediately after treatment, there may be little to no difference between CBT and active control on functional disability (SMD -0.26, 95% CI -0.55 to 0.02; 2 studies, 189 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence at follow-up is very uncertain (MD 3.40, 95% CI -1.15 to 7.95; 1 study, 127 participants). Quality of life Immediately after treatment, there is likely little to no difference in CBT and active control (SMD -0.22, 95% CI -1.11 to 0.66; 3 studies, 261 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence at follow-up is very uncertain (MD 0.00, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.06; 1 study, 127 participants). Adverse events Immediately after treatment, the evidence comparing CBT to active control is very uncertain (2% versus 0%; RR 3.23, 95% CI 0.13 to 77.84; 1 study, 135 participants). No evidence was available at follow-up. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Currently, evidence about remotely-delivered psychological therapies is largely limited to Internet-based delivery of CBT. We found evidence that remotely-delivered CBT has small benefits for pain intensity (moderate certainty) and functional disability (moderate to low certainty) in adults experiencing chronic pain. Benefits were not maintained at follow-up. Our appraisal of quality of life and adverse events outcomes post-treatment were limited by study numbers, evidence certainty, or both. We found limited research (mostly low to very low certainty) exploring other psychological therapies (i.e. ACT). More high-quality studies are needed to assess the broad translatability of psychological therapies to remote delivery, the different delivery technologies, treatment longevity, comparison with active control, and adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emma Fisher
- Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group, Pain Research Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Sadia Janjua
- Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group, Pain Research Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Edmund Keogh
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Geoffrey Duggan
- Bath Centre for Pain Services, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bostrøm K, Børøsund E, Eide H, Varsi C, Kristjansdottir ÓB, Schreurs KMG, Waxenberg LB, Weiss KE, Morrison EJ, Stavenes Støle H, Cvancarova Småstuen M, Stubhaug A, Solberg Nes L. Short-Term Findings From Testing EPIO, a Digital Self-Management Program for People Living With Chronic Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e47284. [PMID: 37624622 PMCID: PMC10492177 DOI: 10.2196/47284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain conditions involve numerous physical and psychological challenges, and while psychosocial self-management interventions can be of benefit for people living with chronic pain, such in-person treatment is not always accessible. Digital self-management approaches could improve this disparity, potentially bolstering outreach and providing easy, relatively low-cost access to pain self-management interventions. OBJECTIVE This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the short-term efficacy of EPIO (ie, inspired by the Greek goddess for the soothing of pain, Epione), a digital self-management intervention, for people living with chronic pain. METHODS Patients (N=266) were randomly assigned to either the EPIO intervention (n=132) or a care-as-usual control group (n=134). Outcome measures included pain interference (Brief Pain Inventory; primary outcome measure), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), self-regulatory fatigue (Self-Regulatory Fatigue 18 scale), health-related quality of life (SF-36 Short Form Health Survey), pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), and pain acceptance (Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire). Linear regression models used change scores as the dependent variables. RESULTS The participants were primarily female (210/259, 81.1%), with a median age of 49 (range 22-78) years and a variety of pain conditions. Analyses (n=229) after 3 months revealed no statistically significant changes for the primary outcome of pain interference (P=.84), but significant reductions in the secondary outcomes of depression (mean difference -0.90; P=.03) and self-regulatory fatigue (mean difference -2.76; P=.008) in favor of the intervention group. No other statistically significant changes were observed at 3 months (all P>.05). Participants described EPIO as useful (ie, totally agree or agree; 95/109, 87.2%) and easy to use (101/109, 92.7%), with easily understandable exercises (106/109, 97.2%). CONCLUSIONS Evidence-informed, user-centered digital pain self-management interventions such as EPIO may have the potential to effectively support self-management and improve psychological functioning in the form of reduced symptoms of depression and improved capacity to regulate thoughts, feelings, and behavior for people living with chronic pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03705104; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03705104.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrine Bostrøm
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elin Børøsund
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Hilde Eide
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Cecilie Varsi
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Ólöf Birna Kristjansdottir
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Learning and Mastery in Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Mental Health Team West, Primary Care of the Capital area, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Karlein M G Schreurs
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Lori B Waxenberg
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Karen E Weiss
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Eleshia J Morrison
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Hanne Stavenes Støle
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Child Health and Development, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Audun Stubhaug
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Regional Advisory Unit on Pain, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lise Solberg Nes
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sanabria-Mazo JP, Colomer-Carbonell A, Borràs X, Castaño-Asins JR, McCracken LM, Montero-Marin J, Pérez-Aranda A, Edo S, Sanz A, Feliu-Soler A, Luciano JV. Efficacy of Videoconference Group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Behavioral Activation Therapy for Depression (BATD) for Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) Plus Comorbid Depressive Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial (IMPACT Study). THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:1522-1540. [PMID: 37105508 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
This study examined the efficacy of adding a remote, synchronous, group, videoconference-based form of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) or behavioral activation therapy for depression (BATD) to treatment-as-usual (TAU) in 234 patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) plus comorbid depressive symptoms. Participants were randomly assigned to ACT, BATD, or TAU. Compared to TAU, ACT produced a significant reduction in pain interference at posttreatment (d = .64) and at follow-up (d = .73). BATD was only superior to TAU at follow-up (d = .66). A significant reduction in pain catastrophizing was reported by patients assigned to ACT and BATD at posttreatment (d = .45 and d = .59, respectively) and at follow-up (d = .59, in both) compared to TAU. Stress was significantly reduced at posttreatment by ACT in comparison to TAU (d = .69). No significant between-group differences were found in depressive or anxiety symptoms. Clinically relevant number needed to treat (NNT) values for reduction in pain interference were obtained at posttreatment (ACT vs TAU = 4) and at follow-up (ACT vs TAU = 3; BATD vs TAU = 5). In both active therapies, improvements in pain interference at follow-up were significantly related to improvements at posttreatment in psychological flexibility. These findings suggest that new forms of cognitive-behavioral therapy are clinically useful in improving pain interference and pain catastrophizing. Further research on evidence-based change processes is required to understand the therapeutic needs of patients with chronic pain and comorbid conditions. TRIAL NUMBER: NCT04140838. PERSPECTIVE: Group videoconference-based ACT and BATD showed greater efficacy than TAU for reducing pain interference and pain catastrophizing in patients with CLBP plus clinically relevant depression. Psychological flexibility appeared to be the main contributor to treatment effects for both ACT and BATD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan P Sanabria-Mazo
- Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain; Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Ariadna Colomer-Carbonell
- Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain; Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Xavier Borràs
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | | | | | - Jesus Montero-Marin
- Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain; Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Adrián Pérez-Aranda
- Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain; Institute of Health Research of Aragon (IIS Aragon), Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Sílvia Edo
- Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Antoni Sanz
- Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Albert Feliu-Soler
- Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Juan V Luciano
- Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain; Centre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Borsutzky S, Moritz S, Hottenrott B, Gehlenborg J. A self-guided Internet-based intervention for individuals with chronic pain and depressive symptoms: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:453. [PMID: 37434163 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07440-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the existence of evidence-based therapy options for the treatment of chronic pain and comorbid depressive symptoms (e.g., CBT), many individuals remain untreated. Treatment gaps result from a lack of specialists, patient fear of stigmatization, or patient immobility. Internet-based self-help interventions could serve as an anonymous and flexible alternative treatment option. In a pilot study, chronic pain patients with comorbid depressive symptoms who used a generic Internet-based depression program showed a significant reduction in depressive symptoms (but not pain symptoms) compared to a waitlist control group. Based on these findings, we developed the low-threshold, anonymous, and cost-free Internet-based self-help intervention Lenio that is tailored to the specific needs of chronic pain patients with comorbid depressive symptoms. Lenio is accompanied by the smartphone application (app) COGITO designed to increase therapeutic success. With Lenio and COGITO addressing both chronic pain and depressive symptoms, the trial aims to increase treatment effects of online interventions for chronic pain patients by reducing both depressive symptoms and pain. METHODS The effectiveness of the Internet-based self-help intervention and accompanying smartphone app will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). A total of 300 participants will be randomized into an intervention group (Lenio/COGITO), an active control group (depression-focused smartphone app), or a waitlist control group. Assessments will be done at baseline, after an 8-week intervention period (post), and after 16 weeks (follow-up). The primary outcome is the post-assessment reduction in "pain impairment" (mean value of impairment in daily life, free time, and work) as assessed by the DSF (German pain questionnaire). Secondary outcomes will include the reduction in depressive symptoms as well as in the severity of pain. DISCUSSION Lenio is one of the first Internet-based interventions to reduce chronic pain and depression that will be empirically evaluated. Internet-based interventions could offer a promising alternative to conventional face-to-face psychotherapy in the treatment of chronic pain patients. The primary objective of the current study is to add essential insight into the feasibility, effectiveness, and acceptance of Internet-based interventions for people with chronic pain and depressive symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION DRKS-ID DRKS00026722, Registered on October 6th, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swantje Borsutzky
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Steffen Moritz
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Birgit Hottenrott
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Josefine Gehlenborg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Donisi V, De Lucia A, Pasini I, Gandolfi M, Schweiger V, Del Piccolo L, Perlini C. e-Health Interventions Targeting Pain-Related Psychological Variables in Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:1845. [PMID: 37444679 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11131845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
There is growing evidence to support the potential benefit of e-Health interventions targeting psychosocial outcomes and/or pain-related psychological variables for chronic pain conditions, including fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). This systematic review aims at providing an in-depth description of the available e-Health psychological and/or multicomponent interventions for patients with FMS. Searches were made in PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and PsycINFO up to 15 May 2023, finally including twenty-six articles. The quality of the included articles was medium-high (average quality assessment score of 77.1%). 50% of studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 13), and the majority of them focused exclusively on adult patients with FMS (n = 23) who were predominantly female. Four categories of e-Health modalities were identified: web-based (n = 19), mobile application (m-Health) (n = 3), virtual reality (VR) (n = 2), and video consulting (n = 2). Interventions were mainly based on the cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approach (n = 14) and mostly involved contact with a healthcare professional through different digital tools. Overall, a growing number of psychological and multicomponent interventions have been created and delivered using digital tools in the context of FMS, showing their potentiality for improving psychosocial outcomes and pain-related psychological variables. However, some digital tools resulted as underrepresented, and the literature on this topic appears highly heterogeneous precluding robust conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Donisi
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Annalisa De Lucia
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Ilenia Pasini
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Marialuisa Gandolfi
- UOC Neurorehabilitation, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRRNC), University of Verona, Policlinico GB Rossi, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Vittorio Schweiger
- Pain Therapy Centre, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Maternal and Infant Sciences, Verona University Hospital, Policlinico GB Rossi, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Lidia Del Piccolo
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Cinzia Perlini
- Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sturgeon JA, Ehde DM, Darnall BD, Barad MJ, Clauw DJ, Jensen MP. Psychological Approaches for Migraine Management. Anesthesiol Clin 2023; 41:341-355. [PMID: 37245946 PMCID: PMC10513739 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2023.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
Migraine headaches are among the most prevalent and disabling pain conditions worldwide. Best-practice migraine management is multidisciplinary and includes the psychological approaches to address cognitive, behavioral, and affective factors that worsen pain, distress, and disability. The psychological interventions with the strongest research support are relaxation strategies, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and biofeedback, though the quality of clinical trials for all psychological interventions needs continued improvement. The efficacy of psychological interventions may be improved by validating technology-based delivery systems, developing interventions for trauma and life stress, and precision medicine approaches matching treatments to patients based on specific clinical characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Sturgeon
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.
| | - Dawn M Ehde
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359612, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
| | - Beth D Darnall
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 430 Broadway Street, Pavilion C, 3rd Floor MC6343, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
| | - Meredith J Barad
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 1070 Arastradero, Suite 200, MC 5596, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Daniel J Clauw
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA; Department of Internal Medicine-Rheumatology, University of Michigan Medical School, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA
| | - Mark P Jensen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359612, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Choe K, Zinn E, Lu K, Hoang D, Yang LH. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on chronic pain and opioid use in marginalized populations: A scoping review. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1046683. [PMID: 37139395 PMCID: PMC10150088 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1046683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has had a variable effect on vulnerable populations, including patients with chronic pain who rely on opioid treatment or have comorbid opioid use disorder. Limited access to care due to isolation measures may lead to increased pain severity, worse mental health symptoms, and adverse opioid-related outcomes. This scoping review aimed to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the dual epidemics of chronic pain and opioids in marginalized communities worldwide. Methods Searches of primary databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO were performed in March 2022, restricting the publication date to December 1, 2019. The search yielded 685 articles. After title and abstract screening, 526 records were screened by title and abstract, 87 through full-text review, of which 25 articles were included in the final analysis. Results Our findings illuminate the differential distribution of pain burden across marginalized groups and how it serves to heighten existing disparities. Service disruptions due to social distancing orders and infrastructural limitations prevented patients from receiving the care they needed, resulting in adverse psychological and physical health outcomes. Efforts to adapt to COVID-19 circumstances included modifications to opioid prescribing regulations and workflows and expanded telemedicine services. Conclusion Results have implications for the prevention and management of chronic pain and opioid use disorder, such as challenges in adopting telemedicine in low-resource settings and opportunities to strengthen public health and social care systems with a multidisciplinary and multidimensional approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Choe
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Eleanor Zinn
- Teachers College Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kevin Lu
- Teachers College Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Dung Hoang
- Teachers College Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Lawrence H. Yang
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kassinopoulos O, Vasiliou V, Karekla M. Overcoming challenges in adherence and engagement digital interventions: The development of the ALGEApp for chronic pain management. Internet Interv 2023; 32:100611. [PMID: 36910302 PMCID: PMC9999164 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the growing body of evidence for the effectiveness of clinic-based interventions in increasing daily functioning in individuals with chronic pain, many sufferers still remain untreated or inadequately treated. Digital psychological interventions have been proposed as a means to overcome many of the barriers to face-to-face treatment (e.g., access, mobility, transportation problems) with the aim to improve health care for persons with chronic conditions in the convenience of their own space and time (home care). The main challenge of digital interventions however, is low user engagement and adherence. Focusing on users' engagement during the design phase of a digital intervention development can increase adherence, effectiveness, and acceptability. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how we leveraged a recently proposed four-dimensional framework with evidence-based best practices and recommendations to develop a new digital intervention for chronic pain management, called the ALGEApp. A detailed presentation of how ALGEApp was designed and developed to adopt the recommendations and how this can aid engagement within digital interventions is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vasilis Vasiliou
- NHS South Wales Clinical Psychology (PsyD) Programme, School of Psychology, University of Cardiff & Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mattocks KM, LaChappelle KM, Krein SL, DeBar LL, Martino S, Edmond S, Ankawi B, MacLean RR, Higgins DM, Murphy JL, Cooper E, Heapy AA. Pre-implementation formative evaluation of cooperative pain education and self-management expanding treatment for real-world access: A pragmatic pain trial. Pain Pract 2023; 23:338-348. [PMID: 36527287 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain (CBT-CP) is an evidence-based treatment for improving functioning and pain intensity for people with chronic pain with extensive evidence of effectiveness. However, there has been relatively little investigation of the factors associated with successful implementation and uptake of CBT-CP, particularly clinician and system level factors. This formative evaluation examined barriers and facilitators to the successful implementation and uptake of CBT-CP from the perspective of CBT-CP clinicians and referring primary care clinicians. METHODS Qualitative interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research were conducted at nine geographically diverse Veterans Affairs sites as part of a pragmatic clinical trial comparing synchronous, clinician-delivered CBT-CP and remotely delivered, technology-assisted CBT-CP. Analysis was informed by a grounded theory approach. RESULTS Twenty-six clinicians (CBT-CP clinicians = 17, primary care clinicians = 9) from nine VA medical centers participated in individual qualitative interviews conducted by telephone from April 2019 to August 2020. Four themes emerged in the qualitative interviews: (1) the complexity and variability of referral pathways across sites, (2) referring clinician's lack of knowledge about CBT-CP, (3) referring clinician's difficulty identifying suitable candidates for CBT-CP, and (4) preference for interventions that can be completed from home. CONCLUSIONS This formative evaluation identified clinician and system barriers to widespread implementation of CBT-CP and allowed for refinement of the subsequent implementation of two forms of CBT-CP in an ongoing pragmatic trial. Identification of relative difference in barriers and facilitators in the two forms of CBT-CP may emerge more clearly in a pragmatic trial that evaluates how treatments perform in real-world settings and may provide important information to guide future system-wide implementation efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin M Mattocks
- VA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System, Leeds, Massachusetts, USA
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathryn M LaChappelle
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sarah L Krein
- VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Lynn L DeBar
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Washington, USA
| | - Steve Martino
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sara Edmond
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Brett Ankawi
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - R Ross MacLean
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Diana M Higgins
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer L Murphy
- US Department of Veterans Affairs Central Office, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Emily Cooper
- VA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System, Leeds, Massachusetts, USA
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alicia A Heapy
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Joy D, Caddle A. A service evaluation to examine the effectiveness of chronic pain management programmes delivered using video conferencing technology compared to in-person. Br J Pain 2023; 17:142-151. [PMID: 37057256 PMCID: PMC10088418 DOI: 10.1177/20494637221135125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The Covid-19 pandemic required rapid substitution of in-person Pain Management Programmes (PMP) delivery with delivery via videoconferencing technologies (VCT). No prior published VCT-PMP effectiveness findings were found, so an evaluation was conducted to explore effectiveness of this method and to compare psychometric outcomes with pre-pandemic, in-person- PMPs, delivered in routine clinical settings. Methods Participants were routinely attending PMPs. A consecutive series of six in-person-PMPs (n = 61) immediately prior to the pandemic were compared with the first series of six VCT-PMPs (n = 64) delivered in the same services. A within-subjects comparison of clinical outcomes (pre-post for VCT-PMP and in-person PMP) and a between-subjects comparison of delivery type was conducted (two-way mixed ANOVA). Reliable change indices examined reliable improvements and deteriorations by delivery type. Results Both PMP delivery format groups made significant improvements in anxiety, depression, pain self-efficacy, chronic pain acceptance and pain catastrophising. No significant difference was found between VCT-PMP and in-person-PMP on each of the measures. Reliable change indices indicated similar levels of improvement and deterioration with each delivery format with improvements far outweighing deteriorations. Attrition was greater in the VCT format (33%) versus in-person-PMP (18%). Conclusion This study indicates that meaningful change as measured by standard psychometric questionnaires can occur in PMPs delivered via VCT and appear broadly equivalent to that achieved through in-person delivery. Physical performance outcomes such as quality and amount of movement were not measured or explored.
Collapse
|
35
|
Hurmuz MZM, Jansen-Kosterink SM, van Velsen L. How to Prevent the Drop-Out: Understanding Why Adults Participate in Summative eHealth Evaluations. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS RESEARCH 2023; 7:125-140. [PMID: 36910916 PMCID: PMC9995638 DOI: 10.1007/s41666-023-00131-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate why adults participate in summative eHealth evaluations, and whether their reasons for participating affect their (non-)use of eHealth. A questionnaire was distributed among adults (aged ≥ 18 years) who participated in a summative eHealth evaluation. This questionnaire focused on participants' reason to enroll, their expectations, and on whether the study met their expectations. Answers to open-ended questions were coded by two researchers independently. With the generalized estimating equations method we tested whether there is a difference between the type of reasons in use of the eHealth service. One hundred and thirty-one adults participated (64.9% female; mean age 62.5 years (SD = 10.5)). Their reasons for participating were mainly health-related (e.g., being more active). Between two types of motivations there was a difference in the use of the eHealth service: Participants with an intellectual motivation were more likely to drop out, compared to participants with an altruistic motivation. The most prevalent expectations when joining a summative eHealth evaluation were health-related (like expecting to improve one's health). 38.6% of the participants said their expectation was fulfilled by the study. In conclusion, We encourage eHealth evaluators to learn about adults' motivation to participate in their summative evaluation, as this motivation is very likely to affect their results. Including altruistically motivated participants biases the results by their tendency to continue participating in a study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian Z M Hurmuz
- Roessingh Research and Development, Roessinghsbleekweg 33B, 7522 AH Enschede, The Netherlands.,Biomedical Signal and Systems Group, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Stephanie M Jansen-Kosterink
- Roessingh Research and Development, Roessinghsbleekweg 33B, 7522 AH Enschede, The Netherlands.,Biomedical Signal and Systems Group, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Lex van Velsen
- Roessingh Research and Development, Roessinghsbleekweg 33B, 7522 AH Enschede, The Netherlands.,Biomedical Signal and Systems Group, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lyon RY, Schuster NM. Rate and Predictors of Patients with Chronic Pain Establishing Care with Pain Psychology Following Pain Physician Referral. PAIN MEDICINE 2023; 24:188-196. [PMID: 35861428 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnac107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine, among patients with chronic pain who had received pain physician referral to pain psychology, the rate of establishing care and factors related to establishing care with pain psychology. DESIGN Retrospective study. SETTING Academic tertiary care center. SUBJECTS Patients from the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Center for Pain Medicine. METHODS This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective study of 150 consecutive referrals of unique patients from UCSD Pain Medicine to UCSD Pain Psychology. RESULTS Of 150 patients referred to pain psychology, 74 (49.3%) established care with pain psychology. Of 98 patients who had previously seen mental health services, 58 established care with pain psychology (59.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 49% to 69%), whereas of 52 patients who had not previously seen mental health services, 16 established care with pain psychology (30.8%; 95% CI: 18% to 43%) (odds ratio [OR] 3.26; 95% CI: 1.60 to 6.66). In the patient subset with depression and/or anxiety, of 82 patients who had previously seen mental health services, 47 established care with pain psychology (57.3%; 95% CI: 47% to 68%), whereas of 20 patients who had not previously seen mental health services, three established care with pain psychology (15%; 95% CI: -1% to 31%) (OR 7.61; 95% CI: 2.07 to 28.01). Of 96 patients referred for general pain psychology evaluations, 43 established care (45%; 95% CI: 35% to 55%), whereas of 38 patients referred for preprocedural evaluation for an implantable device, 24 established care (63%; 95% CI: 48% to 78%). CONCLUSION Patients are significantly more likely to establish care with pain psychology if they have previously seen a mental health professional. This was even more marked among the patient subset with a history of depression and/or anxiety who had engaged in mental health services than among those with a history of depression and/or anxiety who had not engaged in mental health services. Whether referral was for general psychological evaluation or preprocedural evaluation for an implantable device did not significantly influence whether patients established care. Targeted interventions are needed to improve the likelihood of patients engaging with pain psychology services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronit Y Lyon
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nathaniel M Schuster
- Center for Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Li C, Hou W, Ding D, Yang Y, Gu S, Zhu Y. Evidence Mapping Based on Systematic Reviews of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Neuropathic Pain. Neural Plast 2023; 2023:2680620. [PMID: 36994240 PMCID: PMC10041341 DOI: 10.1155/2023/2680620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This evidence mapping is aimed at identifying, summarizing, and analyzing the available evidence on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for neuropathic pain (NP). Methods This study was conducted following the methodology of Global Evidence Mapping (GEM). Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO to identify systematic reviews (SRs) with or without meta-analysis published before February 15, 2022. The authors independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality of the included SRs using AMSTAR-2. The results were presented in the tables and a bubble plot based on the identified population-intervention-comparison-outcome (PICO) questions. Results A total of 34 SRs met the eligibility criteria. According to the AMSTAR-2, 2 SRs were rated "high," 2 SRs were rated "moderate," 6 SRs were rated "low," and 24 SRs were rated "critically low." The most common study design utilized to evaluate the efficacy of CBT for NP was the randomized controlled trial. In total, 24 PICOs were identified. Migraine was the most studied population. CBT for NP usually reaches the "potentially better" result at follow-up. Conclusions Evidence mapping is a useful way to present existing evidence. Currently, the existing evidence on CBT for NP is limited. Overall, the methodological quality of the included SRs was low. Further improvements in the methodological quality of SRs and more research on the most efficient CBT formats for NP are recommended in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conghui Li
- 1The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
- 2Academy of Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
| | - Weiqian Hou
- 1The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
- 2Academy of Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
| | - Dongfang Ding
- 1The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
- 2Academy of Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
| | - Yujie Yang
- 3University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong 266000, China
| | - Shanshan Gu
- 4Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yi Zhu
- 1The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Terpstra JA, van der Vaart R, van Beugen S, van Eersel RA, Gkika I, Erdős D, Schmidt J, Radstake C, Kloppenburg M, van Middendorp H, Evers AW. Guided internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with chronic pain: A meta-analytic review. Internet Interv 2022; 30:100587. [PMID: 36406977 PMCID: PMC9672957 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic pain has a large individual and societal burden. Previous reviews have shown that internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (iCBT) can support patients' pain coping. However, factors related to participant experience of iCBT and effective and safe iCBT delivery for chronic pain have not recently been summarized. Objective The aim of this review was to give an overview of the efficacy of guided iCBT for chronic pain on psychological, physical, and impact on daily life outcomes, including factors that inform optimal delivery. Methods Cochrane, Emcare, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase were systematically searched from inception to 11 February 2022. Randomized controlled trials on guided iCBTs for adults with chronic pain were included with a broad range of outcomes. Results The search yielded 7406 studies of which 33 studies were included totaling 5133 participants. ICBT was more effective than passive control conditions for psychological (ES = 0.34-0.47), physical (ES = 0.26-0.29), and impact outcomes (ES = 0.38-0.41). ICBT was more effective than active control conditions for distress (ES = 0.40), pain acceptance (ES = 0.15), and pain interference after outlier removal (ES = 0.30). Longer treatments were associated with larger effects for anxiety and quality of life than shorter treatments. Mode of therapist contact (synchronous, asynchronous or a mix of both) was not related to differences in effect sizes in most outcomes. However, studies with mixed and synchronous contact modes had higher effects on pain self-efficacy than studies with asynchronous contact modes. Treatment satisfaction was high and adverse events were minor. Dropout was related to time, health, technical issues, and lack of computer skills. Conclusions Guided iCBT is an effective and potentially safe treatment for chronic pain. Future research should more consistently report on iCBT safety and detail the effectiveness of individual treatment components to optimize iCBT in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessy A. Terpstra
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Rheumatology, C1-R, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rosalie van der Vaart
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sylvia van Beugen
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Roxy A. van Eersel
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ioanna Gkika
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Dorottya Erdős
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jana Schmidt
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline Radstake
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet Kloppenburg
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Rheumatology, C1-R, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Henriët van Middendorp
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea W.M. Evers
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, B1-P, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
- Medical Delta, Huismansingel 4, 2629 JH Delft, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hennemann S, Böhme K, Kleinstäuber M, Ruckes C, Baumeister H, Daniel Ebert D, Küchler AM, Witthöft M. Is Therapist Support Needed? Comparing Therapist- and Self-Guided Internet-Based CBT for Somatic Symptom Distress (iSOMA) in Emerging Adults. Behav Ther 2022; 53:1205-1218. [PMID: 36229117 DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2022.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Persistent somatic symptoms of varying etiology are very common in emerging adults and can lead to distress and impairment. Internet-delivered interventions could help to prevent the burden and chronicity of persistent somatic symptoms. This study investigated the impact of therapist guidance on the effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral Internet intervention for somatic symptom distress (iSOMA) in emerging adults, as a secondary analysis of a two-armed randomized controlled trial. We included 149 university students (83.2% female, 24.60 yrs) with varying degrees of somatic symptom distress who were either allocated to the 8-week intervention with regular, written therapeutic guidance (iSOMA guided) or to the control group (waitlist), which was afterwards crossed over to receive iSOMA with guidance-on-demand (iSOMA-GoD). Primary outcomes were somatic symptom distress (assessed by the PHQ-15) and psychobehavioral symptoms of the somatic symptom disorder (assessed by the SSD-12) at pre- and post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included depression, anxiety, and disability. Both treatments showed statistically significant pre-post improvements in primary (iSOMA-guided: d = 0.86-0.92, iSOMA-GoD: d = 0.55-0.63) and secondary outcomes. However, intention-to-treat analysis revealed non-significant between-group effects for all outcomes (ps ≥ .335), after controlling for confounding variables, and effect sizes were marginal (d = -0.06 to 0.12). Overall, our findings indicate that Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy with regular guidance is not unequivocally superior to guidance-on-demand in alleviating somatic symptom distress and associated psychopathology in emerging adults. As a next step, non-inferiority studies are needed to test the robustness of these findings and their impact on clinical populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Maria Kleinstäuber
- Utah State University, Emma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services
| | - Christian Ruckes
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Braun L, Terhorst Y, Titzler I, Freund J, Thielecke J, Ebert DD, Baumeister H. Lessons Learned from an Attempted Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial for Improvement of Chronic Pain-Associated Disability in Green Professions: Long-Term Effectiveness of a Guided Online-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (PACT-A). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:13858. [PMID: 36360738 PMCID: PMC9655679 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192113858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Musculoskeletal symptoms are increased in farmers, whereas the prevalence of chronified pain is unknown. Online interventions based on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) have shown encouraging results in the general population, representing a promising approach for reducing pain interference in green professions (i.e., farmers, foresters, gardeners). We conducted a pragmatic RCT comparing a guided ACT-based online intervention to enhanced treatment-as-usual in entrepreneurs, contributing spouses, family members and pensioners in green professions with chronic pain (CPG: ≥grade II, ≥6 months). Recruitment was terminated prematurely after 2.5 years at N = 89 (of planned N = 286). Assessments were conducted at 9 weeks (T1), 6 months (T2) and 12 months (T3) post-randomization. The primary outcome was pain interference (T1). The secondary outcomes encompassed pain-, health- and intervention-related variables. No treatment effect for reduction of pain interference was found at T1 (β = -0.16, 95%CI: -0.64-0.32, p = 0.256). Improvements in cognitive fusion, pain acceptance, anxiety, perceived stress and quality of life were found only at T3. Intervention satisfaction as well as therapeutic and technological alliances were moderate, and uptake and adherence were low. Results are restricted by low statistical power due to recruitment issues, high study attrition and low intervention adherence, standing in contrast to previous studies. Further research is warranted regarding the use of ACT-based online interventions for chronic pain in this occupational group. Trial registration: German Clinical Trial Registration: DRKS00014619. Registered: 16 April 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Braun
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Yannik Terhorst
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Department of Research Methods, Institute of Psychology and Education, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Ingrid Titzler
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91052 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johanna Freund
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91052 Erlangen, Germany
- Faculty TUM Department of Sport and Health Sciences, TU Munich, 80992 Munich, Germany
| | - Janika Thielecke
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91052 Erlangen, Germany
- Faculty TUM Department of Sport and Health Sciences, TU Munich, 80992 Munich, Germany
| | - David Daniel Ebert
- Faculty TUM Department of Sport and Health Sciences, TU Munich, 80992 Munich, Germany
| | - Harald Baumeister
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Patterns of patient outcomes following specialist pain management in Australasia: a latent class analysis using the ePPOC database. Pain 2022; 164:967-976. [PMID: 36448970 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The increasing demand for pain management and limited resources available highlight the need to measure treatment effectiveness. We analysed data collected at 75 specialist persistent pain services located in Australia and New Zealand to calculate overall treatment outcome for patients receiving care during 2014-2020. Socio-demographic and clinical information was provided for 23,915 patients, along with patient-reported measures assessing pain, pain interference, depression, anxiety, stress, pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy. Latent Class Analysis identified four distinct outcomes based on patients' pattern of responses across the assessment tools at treatment end. Group 1 (n=8,369, 35%) reported low/mild severity across all clinical domains at the end of care, while Group 4 (n= 7,081, 30%) were more likely to report moderate/high severity on all domains. Group 2 (n=1,991, 8%) reported low/mild pain with moderate/high psychological distress at treatment end, and Group 3 (n=6,474, 27%) reported moderate/high pain with low/mild psychological distress. Multi-variable logistic regression identified those factors associated with the different groups. In particular, factors most predictive of a poor (Group 4) vs. good outcome (Group 1) were unemployment (due to pain or other reasons), requiring an interpreter, widespread pain, pain of longer duration and attributing the pain to an injury at work. The results may allow identification of those most likely to benefit from the services currently provided, and inform development of alternative or enhanced services for those at risk of a poor outcome.
Collapse
|
42
|
Serrat M, Albajes K, Navarrete J, Almirall M, Lluch Girbés E, Neblett R, Luciano JV, Moix J, Feliu-Soler A. Effectiveness of two video-based multicomponent treatments for fibromyalgia: The added value of cognitive restructuring and mindfulness in a three-arm randomised controlled trial. Behav Res Ther 2022; 158:104188. [PMID: 36116229 DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of two video-based multicomponent programs (FIBROWALK) and the Multicomponent Physiotherapy Program (MPP) for patients with fibromyalgia (FM) compared to treatment-as-usual (TAU) only. We posit that FIBROWALK, due to inclusion of specific psychological ingredients (cognitive restructuring and mindfulness), can produce additional clinical benefits when compared to TAU or MPP alone. METHODS A total of 330 patients with FM were recruited and randomly allocated (1:1:1) to TAU only, TAU + FIBROWALK, or TAU + MPP. FIBROWALK and MPP consisted of weekly videos on pain neuroscience education, therapeutic exercise and self-management patient education, but only the FIBROWALK intervention provided cognitive restructuring and mindfulness. Both programs were structurally equivalent. Between-group differences in functional impairment, pain, kinesiophobia, anxious-depressive symptoms and physical functioning were evaluated at post-treatment following Intention-To-Treat and complete-case approaches. RESULTS Compared to TAU only, individuals in the FIBROWALK arm showed larger improvements in all clinical outcomes; similarly, participants in the MPP program also showed greater improvements in functional impairment, perceived pain, kinesiophobia, depressive symptoms compared to TAU only. The FIBROWALK intervention showed superior effects in improving pain, anxiety and depressive symptoms and physical functioning compared to MPP. CONCLUSIONS This RCT supports the short-term effectiveness of the video-based multicomponent programs FIBROWALK and MPP for FM and provides evidence that cognitive-behavioural and mindfulness-based techniques can be clinically useful in the context of physiotherapeutic multicomponent treatment programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04571528.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayte Serrat
- Unitat d'Expertesa en Síndromes de Sensibilització Central, Servei de Reumatologia, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, 08035, Barcelona, Spain; Escoles Universitàries Gimbernat, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Klara Albajes
- Department of Basics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Jaime Navarrete
- Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, 08950, Barcelona, Spain; Psychological Research in Fibromyalgia and Chronic Pain (AGORA Research Group), Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain.
| | - Miriam Almirall
- Unitat d'Expertesa en Síndromes de Sensibilització Central, Servei de Reumatologia, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | - Juan V Luciano
- Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, 08950, Barcelona, Spain; Psychological Research in Fibromyalgia and Chronic Pain (AGORA Research Group), Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Jenny Moix
- Department of Basics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Albert Feliu-Soler
- Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, 08950, Barcelona, Spain; Psychological Research in Fibromyalgia and Chronic Pain (AGORA Research Group), Teaching, Research & Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, St. Boi de Llobregat, Spain; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
de la Coba P, Rodríguez-Valverde M, Hernández-López M. Online ACT intervention for fibromyalgia: An exploratory study of feasibility and preliminary effectiveness with smartphone-delivered experiential sampling assessment. Internet Interv 2022; 29:100561. [PMID: 35855947 PMCID: PMC9287477 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is an effective treatment for chronic pain conditions. ACT seeks to produce clinical change by enhancing Psychological Flexibility (PF). This exploratory (feasibility and preliminary effectiveness) study presents a pilot application of an online ACT group intervention for fibromyalgia (FM) with an extensive Experiential Sampling (ES) assessment of outcome and process variables via smartphone. METHOD 5-weekly ACT online group sessions were applied to 9 female FM patients. Questionnaire-based assessments of several clinical outcomes and PF processes were conducted pre- and post-intervention, and at 6-month follow-up. Extensive (6 weeks pre- and 6 weeks post-intervention) smartphone-delivered ES was implemented to gather process and outcome data in the patients' usual contexts. Clinically significant change was evaluated both at the group level and individually. RESULTS This treatment format appears to be feasible and acceptable to participants, with good adoption and completion rates (75 %) and excellent rates of treatment completion and clinical adherence (100 %). Participants showed significant reductions in affective pain, distress and biopsychosocial impact of FM both post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up (as measured with questionnaires), as well as significant improvements in satisfaction with actions and emotional discomfort (as measured through ES). Multilevel regression analyses indicated that PF-related processes assessed through ES had a significant impact on clinical outcomes and predicted the impact of FM at the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS A brief online group ACT intervention for FM was both feasible and acceptable to participants. Also, there was preliminary evidence of effectiveness in enhancing pain-related PF and producing clinical benefits in FM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo de la Coba
- Corresponding author at: Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ernstzen D, Keet J, Louw KA, Park-Ross J, Pask L, Reardon C, Zway M, Parker R. "So, you must understand that that group changed everything": perspectives on a telehealth group intervention for individuals with chronic pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:538. [PMID: 35658929 PMCID: PMC9166594 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05467-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Patient Education Empowerment Programme (PEEP) is an interdisciplinary group intervention for people living with chronic pain. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown and restrictions on in-person group-based health care delivery in South Africa, PEEP was modified to a telehealth electronic format (ePEEP) and offered to patients on a waiting list at two interdisciplinary chronic pain clinics in Cape Town, South Africa. The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility and acceptability of ePEEP through the perspectives of individuals with chronic pain who participated in ePEEP. METHODS: A qualitative, exploratory descriptive study was conducted. One month after completion of the 6-week ePEEP programme, individuals who participated, were recruited for the study. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Data analysis followed an iterative process of inductive content analysis. RESULTS: Six individuals, all women, consented and participated in the study. Three main themes emerged from the data. Theme one focussed on how ePEEP initiated a journey of personal development and discovery within the participants. In theme two, participants reflected on the importance and value of building peer and therapeutic relationships as part of ePEEP. In theme 3, participants shared that the online learning environment had features which influenced learning about pain in different ways. CONCLUSION ePEEP was found to be acceptable, feasible and valuable for the participants. ePEEP facilitated self-discovery, empowerment, relationship building and transformation in the participants, through experiential learning. Although barriers and facilitators to learning were present, both enhanced the learning experience. The positive reception of this telehealth initiative indicates potential for enhanced access to chronic pain management services in the South African setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn Ernstzen
- Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Janet Keet
- Pain Management Unit, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Kerry-Ann Louw
- Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Jocelyn Park-Ross
- Pain Management Unit, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Lorien Pask
- Pain Management Unit, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Cameron Reardon
- Division of Physiotherapy, Ukwanda Centre for Rural Health Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Maia Zway
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Tygerberg Hospital, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Romy Parker
- Pain Management Unit, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
MacPherson M, Bakker AM, Anderson K, Holtzman S. Do pain management apps use evidence-based psychological components? A systematic review of app content and quality. Can J Pain 2022; 6:33-44. [PMID: 35694141 PMCID: PMC9176230 DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2030212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background With hundreds of pain management apps on the Canadian marketplace, it can be challenging for patients and clinicians to select effective and evidence-based mobile health (mHealth) apps that address pain from a biopsychosocial perspective. Aims The aim of this study is to identify pain management apps within the Canadian app marketplaces to aid clinicians in recommending apps. Methods The iOS and Android marketplaces were systematically searched to identify pain management apps that included at least one core component of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or mindfulness- and acceptance-based therapies. Selected apps were assessed using a researcher developed psychological components checklist, and the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). These two measures provided a robust assessment of the apps' technical abilities and psychological principles being implemented. Results Five hundred eight pain management apps were identified, yet only 12 included a psychological component and were available for evaluation. On average, apps contained 8.10 out of 18 psychological components (SD = 2.77) with a MARS quality rating of 4.02 out of 5 (SD = 0.32). The most common psychological components were grounded in CBT, including psychoeducation, sleep hygiene, behavioral activation, coping skills training, and social support. Among the least commonly included components were goal setting, values, and culture/diversity. Two-thirds of the apps involved health care practitioners in their development, but independent scientific review of apps was scarce. Conclusion The highest scoring apps (Curable, Pathways, Vivify) are highlighted for health care practitioners who may wish to recommend mHealth technologies to their patients for pain management. Future directions for research and app development are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan MacPherson
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia,Okanagan Campus; 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V, Canada,CONTACT Megan MacPherson School of Health and Exercise Sciences; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada
| | - A. Myfanwy Bakker
- Department of Psychology, Universiy of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Koby Anderson
- Department of Psychology, Universiy of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Susan Holtzman
- Department of Psychology, Universiy of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Menzies RE, Sharpe L, Richmond B, Dudeney J, Todd J, Szabo M, Sesel AL, Dear B. Randomised controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy versus mindfulness for people with rheumatoid arthritis with and without a history of recurrent depression: study protocol and design. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e056504. [PMID: 35589354 PMCID: PMC9121498 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Psychosocial treatments have been shown to benefit people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on various outcomes. Two evidence-based interventions are cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). However, these interventions have been compared only once. Results showed that CBT outperformed MBSR on some outcomes, but MBSR was more effective for people with RA with a history of recurrent depression, with efficacy being moderated by history of depressive episodes. However, this was a post-hoc finding based on a small subsample. We aim to examine whether a history of recurrent depression will moderate the relative efficacy of these treatments when delivered online. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study is a randomised controlled trial comparing CBT and MBSR delivered online with a waitlist control condition. History of recurrent depressive episodes will be assessed at baseline. The primary outcome will be pain interference. Secondary outcomes will include pain intensity, RA symptoms, depressive symptoms and anxiety symptoms. Outcome measures will be administered at baseline, post-treatment and at 6 months follow-up. We aim to recruit 300 participants, and an intention-to-treat analysis will be used. Linear mixed models will be used, with baseline levels of treatment outcomes as the covariate, and group and depressive status as fixed factors. The results will demonstrate whether online CBT and MBSR effectively improve outcomes among people with RA. Importantly, this trial will determine whether one intervention is more efficacious, and whether prior history of depression moderates this effect. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Sydney (2021/516). The findings will be subject to publication irrespective of the final results of the study, and based on the outcomes presented in this protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000997853p).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel E Menzies
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louise Sharpe
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bethany Richmond
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joanne Dudeney
- Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jemma Todd
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marianna Szabo
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amy-Lee Sesel
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Blake Dear
- Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Morcillo-Muñoz Y, Sánchez-Guarnido AJ, Calzón-Fernández S, Baena-Parejo I. Multimodal Chronic Pain Therapy for Adults via Smartphone: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e36114. [PMID: 35373 PMCID: PMC9133987 DOI: 10.2196/36114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combination therapies delivered remotely via the internet or mobile devices are increasingly being used to improve and promote the self-management of chronic conditions. However, little is known regarding the long-term effects of these interventions. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodal intervention program that measures associated variables such as catastrophizing, pain acceptance, and quality of life using a mobile device in people with chronic pain in an outpatient setting. METHODS A randomized controlled clinical trial was performed using parallel treatment groups. A total of 209 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain were randomly assigned to one of the two study arms. The intervention group received a standard web-based psychosocial therapy-type program of activities through a smartphone for 6 weeks. The control group only had access to the Find out more section of the app, which contained audiovisual material for pain management based on a self-help approach. The primary outcome was catastrophizing measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Secondary outcomes were pain acceptance measured using the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire and health-related quality of life measured using the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale. Assessments were conducted at baseline (T1), after treatment (T2), and at the 3-month follow-up (T3). The variations between the different phases were assessed using the percentage change rescaled with log base 2. The Cohen d was calculated based on the results of the linear mixed model. The investigators of the study who evaluated the results were not involved in patient recruitment and were blinded to the group assignment. RESULTS Positive effects were found in the intervention group (T2-T1) in catastrophizing between the baseline and posttreatment phases (P<.001) and in helplessness (-0.72 vs 0.1; P=.002), rumination (-1.59 vs -0.53; P<.001), acceptance (0.38 vs 0.05; P=.001), and quality of life (0.43 vs -0.01; P=.002), although no significant changes were found for magnification (0.2 vs 0.77; P=.14) and satisfaction with health (0.25 vs -0.27; P=.13). Three months after treatment, significant differences were observed in the intervention group for the outcome variable of catastrophizing (PCS; -0.59 vs 0.2; P=.006) and the PCS subscales of helplessness (-0.65 vs 0.01; P=.07), rumination (1.23 vs -0.59; P=.04), and magnification (0.1 vs 0.86; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS The results of our study suggest that app-based mobile multidimensional treatments for adults with chronic pain improve catastrophizing, quality of life, and psychological flexibility immediately after treatment and that the effects are maintained for the primary outcome of catastrophizing for at least 3 months following treatment. Moreover, they promote self-management and can be used to complement face-to-face pain treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04509154; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04509154.
Collapse
|
48
|
Gasslander N, Andersson G, Boström F, Brandelius L, Pelling L, Hamrin L, Gordh T, Buhrman M. Tailored internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for individuals with chronic pain and comorbid psychological distress: a randomized controlled trial. Cogn Behav Ther 2022; 51:408-434. [PMID: 35533363 DOI: 10.1080/16506073.2022.2065528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Comorbid psychological problems are commonly related to chronic pain but addressing heterogeneous comorbidities in traditional settings is often difficult. Delivering individually tailored treatment using the internet could be a viable alternative. The present study investigates whether a guided, individually tailored and internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) could improve mood and reduce disability in individuals suffering from chronic pain and comorbid psychological distress.Participants were recruited from a pain clinic and randomized to either ICBT or waiting list. The participants (n = 187) individually tailored treatments included 6-13 modules targeting different types of psychological distress. Modules were designed to be completed weekly, and feedback was provided by clinicians. Participants completed an average of 5.1 (49.7%) modules, with 22.9% completing all assigned modules. Intention-to-treat analyses showed significantly larger improvements in depression, disability, pain acceptance, catastrophizing, and quality of life in the ICBT-group compared to the control group. Between-group effect sizes were very small or small at post for the primary outcomes depression (d = 0.18) and pain interference (d = 0.22). Other effect sizes ranged from very small to small, with the largest effect being improvements in pain acceptance (d = 0.3). All significant changes were stable at 12-month follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils Gasslander
- Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Gerhard Andersson
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Frida Boström
- Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lisa Brandelius
- Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lotta Pelling
- Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lovisa Hamrin
- Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Torsten Gordh
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Pain Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Monica Buhrman
- Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cheng DK, Lai KSP, Pico-Espinosa OJ, Rice DB, Chung C, Modarresi G, Sud A. Interventions for Depressive Symptoms in People Living with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2022; 23:934-954. [PMID: 34373915 PMCID: PMC9071227 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnab248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This review investigated the effectiveness of clinical interventions on depressive symptoms in people with all types of chronic pain. METHODS We searched seven electronic databases and reference lists on September 15, 2020, and included English-language, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of trials that examined the effects of clinical interventions on depressive outcomes in chronic pain. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and assessed the risk of bias. PROSPERO registration: CRD42019131871. RESULTS Eighty-three reviews were selected and included 182 meta-analyses. Data were summarized visually and narratively using standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals as the primary outcome of interest. A large proportion of meta-analyses investigated fibromyalgia or mixed chronic pain, and psychological interventions were most commonly evaluated. Acceptance and commitment therapy for general chronic pain, and fluoxetine and web-based psychotherapy for fibromyalgia showed the most robust effects and can be prioritized for implementation in clinical practice. Exercise for arthritis, pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain, self-regulatory psychotherapy for axial pain, and music therapy for general chronic pain showed large, significant effects, but estimates were derived from low- or critically low-quality reviews. CONCLUSIONS No single intervention type demonstrated substantial superiority across multiple pain populations. Other dimensions beyond efficacy, such as accessibility, safety, cost, patient preference, and efficacy for non-depressive outcomes should also be weighed when considering treatment options. Further effectiveness research is required for common pain types such as arthritis and axial pain, and common interventions such as opioids, anti-inflammatories and acupuncture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren K Cheng
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Golale Modarresi
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Canada
| | - Abhimanyu Sud
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bostrøm K, Varsi C, Eide H, Børøsund E, Kristjansdottir ÓB, Schreurs KMG, Waxenberg LB, Weiss KE, Morrison EJ, Nordang EF, Stubhaug A, Nes LS. Engaging with EPIO, a digital pain self-management program: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:577. [PMID: 35488295 PMCID: PMC9052507 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07963-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic pain conditions entail significant personal and societal burdens and improved outreach of evidence-based pain self-management programs are needed. Digital cognitive-behavioral self-management interventions have shown promise. However, evidence is still scarce and several challenges with such interventions for chronic pain exist. Exploring patients' experiences and engagement with digital interventions may be an essential step towards developing meaningful digital self-management interventions for those living with chronic pain. Objectives This study aimed to gain insight into the experiences of people with chronic pain when engaging with EPIO, an application (app)-based cognitive-behavioral pain self-management intervention program. Methods Participants (N = 50) living with chronic pain received access to the EPIO intervention in a feasibility pilot-study for 3 months. During this time, all participants received a follow-up phone call at 2–3 weeks, and a subsample (n = 15) also participated in individual semi-structured interviews after 3 months. A qualitative design was used and thematic analysis was employed aiming to capture participants’ experiences when engaging with the EPIO intervention program. Results Findings identifying program-related experiences and engagement were organized into three main topics, each with three sub-themes: (1) Engaging with EPIO; motivation to learn, fostering joy and enthusiasm, and helpful reminders and personalization, (2) Coping with pain in everyday life; awareness, practice and using EPIO in everyday life, and (3) The value of engaging with the EPIO program; EPIO – a friend, making peace with the presence of pain, and fostering communication and social support. Conclusions This qualitative study explored participants’ experiences and engagement with EPIO, a digital self-management intervention program for people living with chronic pain. Findings identified valued aspects related to motivation for engagement, and showed how such a program may be incorporated into daily life, and encourage a sense of acceptance, social support and relatedness. The findings highlight vital components for facilitating digital program engagement and use in support of self-management for people living with chronic pain. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03705104. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07963-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrine Bostrøm
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Varsi
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Hilde Eide
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Centre for Health and Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Elin Børøsund
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ólöf B Kristjansdottir
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian National Advisory Unit On Learning and Mastery in Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karlein M G Schreurs
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Lori B Waxenberg
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Karen E Weiss
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Eleshia J Morrison
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Elise Flakk Nordang
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Audun Stubhaug
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Regional Advisory Unit On Pain, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lise Solberg Nes
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. .,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. .,Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|