Cardiometabolic Adverse Effects and Its Predictors in Children and Adolescents With First-Episode Psychosis During Treatment With Quetiapine-Extended Release Versus Aripiprazole: 12-Week Results From the Tolerance and Effect of Antipsychotics in Children and Adolescents With Psychosis (TEA) Trial

Systematic review and meta-analysis of weight gain and metabolic changes in children and adolescents using second-generation antipsychotics

The use of second-generation antipsychotics in children and adolescents has significantly increased in recent decades, raising concerns about side effects such as weight gain, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance. These effects are concerning during development, as they may predispose individuals to adult obesity and metabolic complications. Therefore, the aim of this review is to update the evidence on associations between the use of these medications, weight gain, BMI changes, and major metabolic alterations in children and adolescents. This review was conducted following the PRISMA protocol and registered in PROSPERO under the number: CRD42024549448. The search was carried out in March 2024 using the terms "child," "adolescent," "weight gain," "metabolism disorders," and "antipsychotics," combined with the AND operator in the MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, and PubMed databases. The main findings of this review included weight gain, increased BMI, and metabolic alterations, such as insulin resistance and increased abdominal circumference. The meta-analysis highlighted a positive association between one of the investigated second-generation antipsychotics and weight gain. Therefore, prescriptions may be accompanied by strict guidelines for nutritional monitoring and metabolic control interventions.

Drugs used in psychiatry causing an increase in body weight in children-a review

Body weight gain is a prevalent adverse effect observed in psychiatric medication therapy. With the notable increase in mental health diagnoses among children and adolescents over the last decade, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of medications associated with weight gain poses an additional risk for obesity development. This study aimed to identify psychiatric drugs that may induce weight gain in children as a side effect. Twenty-nine publications were included in this systematic review, investigating the effects of nineteen different drugs on children's weight. The majority of these drugs belonged to atypical antipsychotics and anticonvulsants. Nearly all included articles reported that the examined substances resulted in weight gain in children. As childhood obesity has become a significant problem with various metabolic, psychological and social consequences, it is crucial to carefully consider therapy options. In addition to evaluating effectiveness, it is important to also assess the potential for weight gain. Clinicians and nutrition specialists should individually evaluate patients' nutritional needs, evaluate obesity risk, and provide appropriate dietary guidance to minimalize the risk of weight gain.

Comparative physiological effects of antipsychotic drugs in children and young people: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The degree of physiological responses to individual antipsychotic drugs is unclear in children and adolescents. With network meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the effects of various antipsychotic medications on physiological variables in children and adolescents with neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental conditions.

METHODS

For this network meta-analysis, we searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus from database inception until Dec 22, 2023, and included randomised controlled trials comparing antipsychotics with placebo in children or adolescents younger than 18 years with any neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental condition. Primary outcomes were mean change from baseline to end of acute treatment in bodyweight, BMI, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, prolactin, heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) for patients receiving either active treatment or placebo. For multigroup trials reporting several doses, we calculated a summary value for each physiological variable for all doses. After transitivity assessment, we fitted frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses for all comparisons in the network. A Kilim plot was used to summarise the results for all treatments and outcomes, providing information regarding the strength of the statistical evidence of treatment effects, using p values. Network heterogeneity was assessed with τ, risk of bias of individual trials was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias, and the credibility of findings from each network meta-analysis was assessed with the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINEMA) app. This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021274393).

FINDINGS

Of 6676 studies screened, 47 randomised controlled trials were included, which included 6500 children (mean age 13·29 years, SD 2·14) who received treatment for a median of 7 weeks (IQR 6-8) with either placebo (n=2134) or one of aripiprazole, asenapine, blonanserin, clozapine, haloperidol, lurasidone, molindone, olanzapine, paliperidone, pimozide, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone (n=4366). Mean differences for bodyweight change gain compared with placebo ranged from -2·00 kg (95% CI -3·61 to -0·39) with molindone to 5·60 kg (0·27 to 10·94) with haloperidol; BMI -0·70 kg/m2 (-1·21 to -0·19) with molindone to 2·03 kg/m2 (0·51 to 3·55) with quetiapine; total cholesterol -0·04 mmol/L (-0·39 to 0·31) with blonanserin to 0·35 mmol/L (0·17 to 0·53) with quetiapine; LDL cholesterol -0·12 mmol/L (-0·31 to 0·07) with risperidone or paliperidone to 0·17 mmol/L (-0·06 to 0·40) with olanzapine; HDL cholesterol 0·05 mmol/L (-0·19 to 0·30) with quetiapine to 0·48 mmol/L (0·18 to 0·78) with risperidone or paliperidone; triglycerides -0·03 mmol/L (-0·12 to 0·06) with lurasidone to 0·29 mmol/L (0·14 to 0·44) with olanzapine; fasting glucose from -0·09 mmol/L (-1·45 to 1·28) with blonanserin to 0·74 mmol/L (0·04 to 1·43) with quetiapine; prolactin from -2·83 ng/mL (-8·42 to 2·75) with aripiprazole to 26·40 ng/mL (21·13 to 31·67) with risperidone or paliperidone; heart rate from -0·20 bpm (-8·11 to 7·71) with ziprasidone to 12·42 bpm (3·83 to 21·01) with quetiapine; SBP from -3·40 mm Hg (-6·25 to -0·55) with ziprasidone to 10·04 mm Hg (5·56 to 14·51) with quetiapine; QTc from -0·61 ms (-1·47 to 0·26) with pimozide to 0·30 ms (-0·05 to 0·65) with ziprasidone.

INTERPRETATION

Children and adolescents show varied but clinically significant physiological responses to individual antipsychotic drugs. Treatment guidelines for children and adolescents with a range of neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental conditions should be updated to reflect each antipsychotic drug's distinct profile for associated metabolic changes, alterations in prolactin, and haemodynamic alterations.

FUNDING

UK Academy of Medical Sciences, Brain and Behaviour Research Foundation, UK National Institute of Health Research, Maudsley Charity, the Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, National Institute of Health and Care Research Biomedical Centre at King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, the Italian Ministry of University and Research, the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan, and Swiss National Science Foundation.

Comparative analysis of third-generation antipsychotics in first-episode schizophrenia: efficacy, safety, and cognitive impacts. A narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Schizophrenia is a chronic, complex mental health disorder requiring effective management to mitigate its broad personal and societal impacts. This narrative review assesses the efficacy, effectiveness, and side effects of third-generation antipsychotics (TGAs) like aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine, focusing on their use in first-episode schizophrenia. These drugs aim to reduce side effects typical of earlier antipsychotics while more effectively addressing positive and cognitive symptoms.

METHODS

Our extensive literature review, using PubMed and Scopus, includes randomized controlled trials and observational studies, showing TGAs may match older antipsychotics in efficacy with fewer side effects, notably in reducing extrapyramidal symptoms and enhancing cognitive outcomes.

RESULTS

Aripiprazole appears effective in both acute and maintenance phases of schizophrenia, while brexpiprazole and cariprazine show potential in managing negative symptoms and improving social functioning, essential for patient recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

This review emphasizes the need for personalized treatment and further research to fully determine the long-term benefits and safety of TGAs. These findings can inform clinical decisions and underline the ongoing need for innovation in schizophrenia pharmacotherapy.

Cardiac and metabolic safety profile of antipsychotics in youths: A WHO safety database analysis

A significant heterogeneity prevails in antipsychotics (APs) safety monitoring recommendations. Youths are deemed more vulnerable to cardiometabolic side effects. We aimed to assess age-dependent reporting of cardiac and metabolic disorders in youths, relying on the WHO safety database (VigiBase®). VigiBase® was queried for all reports of cardiac, glucose, lipid and nutritional disorders involving APs. Patients <18 years were classified as pediatric population. Disproportionality analyses relied on the Information Component (IC): the positivity of the lower end of its 95 % confidence interval was required to suspect a signal. We yielded 4,672 pediatric reports. In disproportionality analysis, nutritional disorders were leading in youths (IC 3.9 [3.9-4.0]). Among healthcare professionals' reports, stronger signals were detected in youths than in adults. Children had the greatest signal with nutritional disorders (IC 4.7 [4.6-4.8]). In adolescents, aripiprazole was ascribed to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Our findings, based on real-world data, support the hypothesis of a greater propensity for nutritional disorders in youths, despite limitations of pharmacovigilance studies. We suggest specific safety profiles, such as aripiprazole and NASH. Pending more answers from population-based studies, a careful anamnesis should seek for risk factors before AP initiation. A cautious monitoring is warranted to allow earlier identification of side effects.

Antipsychotic Medication Use In Medicaid-Insured Children Decreased Substantially Between 2008 And 2016

After the rapid growth of pediatric antipsychotic prescribing in the early 2000s, especially in the Medicaid population, concerns regarding the safety and appropriateness of such prescribing increased. Many states implemented policy and educational initiatives aimed at safer and more judicious antipsychotic use. Antipsychotic use leveled off in the late 2000s, but there have been no recent national estimates of trends in antipsychotic use in children enrolled in Medicaid, and it is unclear how use varied by race and ethnicity. This study observed a sizable decline in antipsychotic use among children ages 2-17 between 2008 and 2016. Although the magnitude of change varied, declines were observed across foster care status, age, sex, and racial and ethnic groups studied. The proportion of children with an antipsychotic prescription who received any diagnosis associated with a pediatric indication that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration increased from 38 percent in 2008 to 45 percent in 2016, which may indicate a trend toward more judicious prescribing.

Editorial: Safer Use of Antipsychotics in Youth (SUAY): Should Treatment Be Guided by Symptoms?

Child and adolescent psychiatrists have company as they wrestle with clinical decision making regarding when it is appropriate to prescribe an antipsychotic. Pediatricians face a similar challenge in trying to determine under what circumstances to prescribe an antibiotic. Both classes of medications are powerful and can be lifesaving, but they are not without the risk of associated adverse events and cumulative exposure. Concerns regarding the widespread use of antipsychotics in children and adolescents have been supported by national trends indicating predominance of prescriptions for conditions (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and impulsive aggression)^1,2 other than those approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder with mania, irritability associated with autism spectrum disorder, and tic disorders); the risks of weight gain, diabetes mellitus, and other adverse effects to which youths appear to be more vulnerable than adults³; and potential disparities related to the absence of race and ethnicity in large administrative datasets.⁴ Previous studies of antipsychotic prescribing patterns predate the widespread use of the diagnosis of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder. A recent study found that 58.9% of youths given a diagnosis of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder were prescribed antipsychotics compared with 51% of youths with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder.⁵ In this issue of the Journal, Penfold et al.⁶ report on a novel approach to antipsychotic prescribing focused on symptoms rather than diagnoses developed as the initial phase of a pragmatic clinical trial, Targeted and Safer Use of Antipsychotics in Youth (SUAY), funded by the National Institute of Mental Health and designed to test the effectiveness of targeted interventions on the use of antipsychotics for youth 4 to 17 years old in large health care systems. We offer some perspectives on differences that distinguish this approach; the process used in its development; and its promise, potential pitfalls, and policy and clinical implications.

CYP2D6 Genotyping and Antipsychotic-Associated Extrapyramidal Adverse Effects in a Randomized Trial of Aripiprazole Versus Quetiapine Extended Release in Children and Adolescents, Aged 12-17 Years, With First Episode Psychosis

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to examine the association between genetically predicted CYP2D6 phenotypes and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs).

METHODS/PROCEDURES

Data from the Tolerability and Efficacy of Antipsychotics trial of adolescents with first-episode psychosis randomized to aripiprazole versus quetiapine extended release were studied. Extrapyramidal symptom assessments included the Simpson-Angus Scale and the Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale. Patients were CYP2D6 genotyped. Plasma concentrations of antipsychotics and antidepressants were analyzed.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

One hundred thirteen youths (age, 12-17 years; males, 30%; antipsychotic naive, 51%) were enrolled. Poor metabolizers had a significantly higher dose-adjusted aripiprazole plasma concentration (±SD) compared with normal metabolizers at week 4 (24.30 ± 6.40 ng/mL per milligram vs 14.85 ± 6.15 ng/mL per milligram; P = 0.019), but not at week 12 (22.15 ± 11.04 ng/mL per milligram vs 14.32 ± 4.52 ng/mL per milligram; P = 0.067). This association was not found in the quetiapine extended release group. No association between CYP2D6 genotype groups and global Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale score or Simpson-Angus Scale score was found in any of the treatment arms.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not support routine use of CYP2D6 testing as a predictor of drug-induced parkinsonism or akathisia risk in clinical settings. Further studies with larger samples of CYP2D6 poor metabolizers are needed.

Efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole versus D2 antagonists in the early course of schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Early intervention is essential for favorable long-term outcomes in schizophrenia. However, there is limited guidance in the scientific literature on how best to choose between dopamine D₂ receptor (D₂R) partial agonists and D₂R antagonists in early stages of schizophrenia. The aim of this meta-analysis was to directly compare D₂R partial agonists with D₂R antagonists for efficacy and tolerability, using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved participants diagnosed with first-episode psychosis, schizophrenia, or related psychotic disorders with a duration of illness ≤5 years. Fourteen RCTs, involving 2494 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Aripiprazole was the only identified D₂R partial agonist, and was not significantly different from pooled D₂R antagonists for overall symptom reduction or all-cause discontinuation. However, aripiprazole was more favorable than pooled D₂R antagonists for depressive symptoms, prolactin levels, and triglyceride levels. Specifically, aripiprazole was more favorable than paliperidone for triglyceride levels and more favorable than risperidone and olanzapine, but less favorable than ziprasidone, for weight gain. In addition, aripiprazole was less favorable for akathisia compared with second-generation D₂R antagonists, in particular olanzapine and quetiapine, and less favorable for discontinuation due to inefficacy than risperidone. Lastly, aripiprazole was more favorable than haloperidol for various efficacy and tolerability outcomes. In conclusion, aripiprazole’s efficacy did not differ substantially from D₂R antagonists in the early course of schizophrenia, whereas differential tolerability profiles were noted. More double-blind RCTs are required comparing the efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole as well as other D₂R partial agonists with D₂R antagonists in early stages of schizophrenia.

Current strategies for predicting side effects from second generation antipsychotics in youth

Introduction: Antipsychotic medications are used to treat a number of conditions in children and adolescents. While side effect profiles from second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) may differ from older antipsychotics, they do not come without risk. Knowing which children may be at higher risk for specific outcomes is important clinical information for prescribers. Common side effects and toxicities of SGAs in children include movement disorders, weight gain, and hormonal changes. There are also rare, but potentially dangerous adverse events including neuroleptic malignant syndrome, hypersensitivity and suicidal ideation.Areas covered: This review will summarize and comment on clinical, pharmacological, and genetic factors having evidence as predictors of SGA-associated side effects and toxicities in children.Expert opinion: Observations across studies note that older children and those that do not respond early in treatment may be more at risk for movement disorders, while younger, antipsychotic naive children are at increased risk for weight gain. Relatively fewer studies have looked at pharmacogenetic relationships, although variations in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic genes hold promise to advance drug dosing or selection strategies. Future efforts to assimilate multiple clinical, pharmacological, and genetic factors to facilitate predictive analytics and clinical decision support for prescribers will advance precision care to patients.

The Burden of Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain and Metabolic Syndrome in Children

Antipsychotic medications are critical to child and adolescent psychiatry, from the stabilization of psychotic disorders like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and psychotic depression to behavioral treatment of autism spectrum disorder, tic disorders, and pediatric aggression. While effective, these medications carry serious risk of adverse events-most commonly, weight gain and cardiometabolic abnormalities. Negative metabolic consequences affect up to 60% of patients and present a major obstacle to long-term treatment. Since antipsychotics are often chronically prescribed beginning in childhood, cardiometabolic risk accumulates. An increased susceptibility to antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) has been repeatedly documented in children, particularly rapid weight gain. Associated cardiometabolic abnormalities include central obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and systemic inflammation. Lifestyle interventions and medications such as metformin have been proposed to reduce risk but remain limited in efficacy. Furthermore, antipsychotic medications touted to be weight-neutral in adults can cause substantial weight gain in children. A better understanding of the biological underpinnings of AIWG could inform targeted and potentially more fruitful treatments; however, little is known about the underlying mechanism. As yet, modest genetic studies have nominated a few risk genes that explain only a small percentage of the risk. Recent investigations have begun to explore novel potential mechanisms of AIWG, including a role for gut microbiota and microbial metabolites. This article reviews the problem of AIWG and AP metabolic side effects in pediatric populations, proposed mechanisms underlying this serious side effect, and strategies to mitigate adverse impact. We suggest future directions for research efforts that may advance the field and lead to improved clinical interventions.

Evaluation of initial atypical antipsychotic monitoring parameters in children and adolescents

Introduction

Atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) are associated with serious cardiometabolic disturbances, including hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, and weight gain. The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Practice parameter for the use of AAPs in children and adolescents encourages that the same monitoring schedule as recommended by the American Diabetes Association be applied to the pediatric population. This study assessed adherence to these monitoring recommendations for AAPs in children and adolescents admitted to a community teaching hospital's inpatient child and adolescent psychiatry unit.

Methods

Patients age <18 years were included if therapy was initiated with an AAP during an inpatient admission to the child and adolescent psychiatry unit. Patients were excluded if prescribed an AAP prior to admission or if the AAP was ordered as needed. The presence of the following was collected upon initiation: body mass index (BMI), fasting blood glucose (FBG), blood pressure (BP), fasting lipids, heart rate (HR), waist circumference, electrocardiogram when indicated, and assessment of efficacy and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Any adverse effects and means of mitigation of those adverse effects were also collected.

Results

In the 45 patients included, the following monitoring parameters were collected: 91.1% had BMI, 84.4% had FBG, 46.6% had fasting lipids, and 0% had waist circumference recorded. Additionally, 100% of patients had an assessment of efficacy and EPS and BP and HR documented.

Discussion

Although this study included a small number of patients, there is area for improvement in obtaining baseline monitoring parameters in children and adolescents initiated on AAPs during an inpatient admission.

Unmetabolized quetiapine exerts an in vitro effect on innate immune cells by modulating inflammatory response and neutrophil extracellular trap formation

Quetiapine is an antipsychotic drug that is used to treat psychiatric and neurological disorders. Despite its efficiency and low-toxicity, quetiapine administration has been associated with undesirable side effects such as the development of low-grade inflammatory disorders and neutropenia states. As the liver rapidly metabolizes quetiapine to metabolites, the non-metabolized part of this molecule might play a role in immune alterations. In an in vitro study, this hypothesis was tested by exposing activated and inactivated RAW-264.7 macrophages and human neutrophils to unmetabolized quetiapine (u-QUE). Based on our findings, u-QUE was not cytotoxic to these cells. u-QUE differentially modulates macrophages according to their activation states. In inactivated macrophages, u-QUE induced a proinflammatory state as observed by an increase in cellular proliferation; increased levels of oxidative molecules (nitric oxide and superoxide), protein levels, and gene overexpression of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α); and decreased levels of IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine. Conversely, on phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-activated macrophages, u-QUE exerted an anti-inflammatory effect. u-QUE induced neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation and increased the sensitivity of the neutrophils previously activated by exposure to dead yeast cells for NET formation. These results confirm the effect of quetiapine on macrophage and neutrophil function, which may be associated with the side effects of this psychopharmaceutical agent.

Oxidative-Antioxidant Imbalance and Impaired Glucose Metabolism in Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a neurodevelopmental disorder featuring chronic, complex neuropsychiatric features. The etiology and pathogenesis of schizophrenia are not fully understood. Oxidative-antioxidant imbalance is a potential determinant of schizophrenia. Oxidative, nitrosative, or sulfuric damage to enzymes of glycolysis and tricarboxylic acid cycle, as well as calcium transport and ATP biosynthesis might cause impaired bioenergetics function in the brain. This could explain the initial symptoms, such as the first psychotic episode and mild cognitive impairment. Another concept of the etiopathogenesis of schizophrenia is associated with impaired glucose metabolism and insulin resistance with the activation of the mTOR mitochondrial pathway, which may contribute to impaired neuronal development. Consequently, cognitive processes requiring ATP are compromised and dysfunctions in synaptic transmission lead to neuronal death, preceding changes in key brain areas. This review summarizes the role and mutual interactions of oxidative damage and impaired glucose metabolism as key factors affecting metabolic complications in schizophrenia. These observations may be a premise for novel potential therapeutic targets that will delay not only the onset of first symptoms but also the progression of schizophrenia and its complications.

Editorial: Making Use of What We Know: Medical Decision-Making and Antipsychotics

Minimizing the duration of untreated psychosis and providing comprehensive early intervention including the use of antipsychotics reflects best practice in the treatment of first-episode psychosis (FEP).¹ The adverse effects of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are well known, namely, weight gain, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia that are associated with an increased risk of obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Youth appear to be more vulnerable to deleterious cardiometabolic effects than adults.² Child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAPs) treating FEP have an ethical duty to carefully select an effective antipsychotic medication, being cognizant of the metabolic profile of the considered SGAs and of the likelihood of prolonged antipsychotic exposure. Which is the "right" antipsychotic medication for the young person in front of me? What is known about the adverse effects of available antipsychotics and how do they compare to each other, not just to placebo? Does information exist to help me anticipate whether my patient is more or less susceptible to adverse cardiometabolic effects?