Clinical Update: Child and Adolescent Behavioral Health Care in Community Systems of Care

An Evaluation Pilot Study of Amplify, a headspace-Inspired Early Intervention Clinic

OBJECTIVE

The United States is experiencing a mental health crisis among youths and young adults. Most serious mental health conditions emerge during the transition to adulthood, and unmet mental health needs continue to rise among young adults. Following Australia's success with headspace, several countries are implementing integrated youth mental health programs, which warrant evaluation in the United States. The purpose of this study was to detail the service engagement, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of the Amplify integrated youth mental health clinic during its first year of operation.

METHODS

The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School implemented Amplify in a community college setting. Participants completed online standardized self-report measures at enrollment and 60 and 180 days later. Staff recorded service delivery in an electronic health record. Data were analyzed for Amplify's first year of operation (January 1-December 31, 2023).

RESULTS

During year 1, Amplify employed a program director, licensed clinical program manager, therapist, supported employment and education specialist, community navigator, part-time psychiatrist, and receptionist. Amplify delivered 1,308 services to 74 youths, 60 of whom consented to participate in the study. Most participated in two types of services. Mean±SD use per participant was 18±18 service units (i.e., sessions). Service satisfaction was high at 60 and 180 days. Mental distress significantly decreased from enrollment to 60 and to 180 days.

CONCLUSIONS

More research on Amplify is needed to further operationalize the model and demonstrate its value to U.S. public and private health care systems and payers.

Stepping Down from Inpatient and Stepping up from Partial Hospitalization Programs

The complexity of child behavioral health and the importance of transitioning from the most restrictive to an intermediate level of care such as a partial hospitalization program (PHP) for high-risk youth is highlighted in this study. While inpatient hospitalization stabilizes youth in imminent danger, PHPs offer intensive treatment of those requiring more support than traditional outpatient care but less intensive than inpatient hospitalization. The transition between levels of care is determined by the severity of symptoms, high-risk behaviors, and clinical progress with planned step-downs from inpatient settings to a PHP and crisis-driven step-ups from a PHP to inpatient.

Anxiety, Depressive, and Eating Disorders in Adolescents

Adolescent anxiety, depressive, and eating disorders are a worsening population health issue that primary care clinicians play a critical role in addressing. Implementing universal screening into clinical practices for depression at age 12 years and anxiety at age 8 years is the first step to diagnosis. Referencing 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders diagnostic criteria is essential to making the correct diagnosis after ruling out underlying medical conditions. The evidence-based mainstays of treatment are unique to each specific disorder.

The Child Welfare System's Response to the National Mental Health Crisis

The nation's child welfare system serves the most vulnerable youth and families and so has been impacted dramatically by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic with decreases of abuse reporting, delayed toward permanency, and increased disproportionality. Youth in foster care have increased likelihood of boarding in hospital emergency rooms or nontraditional placements. These issues are magnified in exceptional vulnerable populations such as American Indian and Alaska Native children. The child welfare response to the national mental health crisis offers opportunities to redress chronic gaps and vulnerabilities within the systems of care serving these youth.

Coordinated System of Care Approaches for Pediatric Emergency and Crisis Stabilization, Mobile Treatment, and Wraparound Services

Youth have been increasingly struggling with their mental health, leading to an unprecedented rise in emergency room visits and inpatient psychiatric admissions. It is prudent for mental health providers to be familiar with all services within a continuum of care that can address the early phases of a crisis, allowing youth to remain in the community while being treated. The system of care (SOC) approach has demonstrated positive effects in mitigating the need for hospital-based services. There is a call among experts to integrate SOC concepts during inpatient psychiatric admissions to promote youth remaining within a community after discharge.

Community Health Workers: Bridge to Pediatric Mental Health Equity

We currently face a national crisis1 in youth mental health and well-being and significant child behavioral health inequities. There is a growing recognition among health care institutions, policymakers, researchers, and communities that major health problems of our time, including this crisis, must be confronted by addressing the underlying "causes of the causes,"2 or social determinants of health. Social determinants of health3 are defined by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as the conditions in which people live, learn, work, play, worship, and age and highlight the role that power and privilege occupy in shaping societal access to these resources. Social determinants of mental health (SDoMH) encompass the same conditions of social determinants of health, with the addition of the stigma often associated with mental health and substance use disorders. SDoMH focus on the social/environmental factors that place certain groups at increased risk for mental health concerns and worsening outcomes for individuals who already have mental health concerns.4 Addressing SDoMH is a key strategy to toward Healthy People 2030 goals and "the attainment of the highest level of health for all people."5.

Creating an Equitable System of Care for Minoritized Youth and Addressing Systemic and Structural Barriers

We provide an overview of the systems of care and the barriers faced by minoritized youth. We discuss ways to address barriers by forging alliances, improving communication with cultural humility, and a nonjudgmental approach. We underscore the importance of a holistic evaluation of minoritized children while leveraging their resilience to create a comprehensive and multipronged plan of action.

Strengthening Support for Community Mental Health Programs Through Partnership and Collective Impact

Effective partnerships can profoundly impact outcomes for youth with behavioral health concerns. Partnerships occur at multiple levels - at the individual, organizational, state, and national levels. The Systems of Care (SOC) framework helps to conceptualize and articulate the skills necessary for forming partnerships in youth's mental health. This article explores values in the SOC framework and makes the case that the framework can help develop a "road map" to develop the skills needed to achieve successful partnerships. Impediments to effective partnerships are also discussed. Several case examples are given to illustrate the principles and impediments to partnership formation.

Editorial: Can Mobile Crisis Response Help Mitigate Racialized Disparities in Acute Child Mental Health Care?

Mobile crisis response (MCR) is a community-based intervention designed to provide de-escalation and relief to individuals experiencing a behavioral health or substance use-related crisis wherever they are, including at home, at work, at school, or in the community. Often it is the first, or only, option for youth who experience barriers to accessing traditional mental health care in the community. Elevated rates of mental health needs and suicidality among children and adolescents in the United States make availability of quality MCR increasingly important. Studies suggest that an estimated 70% to 80% of children with mental health disorders do not receive care, and minoritized children are even less likely to access community-based behavioral health care services.1 MCR can act as a bridge for securing treatment for children in acute distress. However, until recently, few studies have demonstrated the outcomes of MCR services for children and adolescents or more specifically for minoritized youth.

Prescribed psychotropic medication patterns among treated Foster Care enrollees: a single institution study

Background

While several state-based studies have shown that children in foster care are more likely to be prescribed psychotropic medications and experience concomitant medication use both within and among medication class, these patterns have not been explored in the state of Nevada, which lacks state mandated oversight of psychotropic prescribing for foster care enrolled youth.

Methods

Data from an electronic medical record system from a single institution were analyzed to examine the prevalence of psychotropic prescribing and concomitant medication use in children ages 2 to 19 who were enrolled and received psychotropic prescriptions between July 2019 to June 2022.

Results

Out of 569 distinct psychotropic medication treatment episodes within this cohort, the most frequent psychotropic classes prescribed were non-stimulant ADHD medications (alpha-agonists and atomoxetine, 31.5%), atypical antipsychotics (22.1%), antidepressants (20.6%), and stimulants (16.0%). The use of stimulants and non-stimulant ADHD medications decreased in older age groups while the use of antidepressants and antipsychotics increased in older age groups. During the three-year period studied, 24.0% of psychotropic medications prescriptions increased in dosage. Treatments were prescribed for only one month in 43.8% of youth. In children prescribed psychotropic medications, concomitant medication use for at least 60 days occurred in 28.0% of children who had any psychotropic medication prescribed.

Conclusion

Within the cohort of 273 foster care enrolled subjects aged 2 to 19 years old who received psychotropic medication prescriptions, non-stimulant ADHD medications (both alpha-agonists and atomoxetine) and atypical antipsychotics were more commonly co-prescribed additional psychotropic medication compared to other co-prescribed medication categories. This study illustrates prescribing patterns in a community mental health clinic focused on judicious prescribing of psychotropic medications in foster care enrolled youth. Despite this, 41% of the youth treated in this clinic received at least one prescription for psychotropic medication, and of those, 27.8% were prescribed more than one psychotropic medication at the same time. More studies are necessary to understand the underlying causes of high prevalence of concomitant medication use and prescribing practices of psychotropic medications use in foster care involved pediatric populations.

Propelling the Global Advancement of School Mental Health

Rates of mental health problems and disorders in children and youth have been increasing for at least three decades, and these have escalated due to the pandemic and multiple other societal stressors. It is increasingly recognized that students and families frequently struggle to receive needed care through traditional locations such as specialty mental health centers. Upstream mental health promotion and prevention strategies are gaining support as a public health approach to supporting overall population well-being, better utilizing a limited specialty workforce, and reducing illness. Based on these recognitions, there has been a progressive and escalating movement toward the delivery of mental health support to children and youth "where they are," with a prominent and more ecologically valid environment being schools. This paper will provide a brief review of the escalating mental health needs of children and youth, advantages of school mental health (SMH) programs in better meeting these needs, example model SMH programs from the United States and Canada, and national and international SMH centers/networks. We conclude with strategies for further propelling the global advancement of the SMH field through interconnected practice, policy, and research.

Disparities in Youth and Family Experiences of System-of-Care Principles by Level of Youth Need

The extent to which mental health services for youths embody system-of-care (SOC) principles is an important quality indicator. This study tested whether youth and family experiences of SOC principles varied depending on youths' level of need after adjusting for sociodemographic and treatment factors. The relationship to caregiver-reported clinical outcomes was also examined. Using administrative data and cross-sectional surveys from a stratified random sample of 1124 caregivers of youths ages 5-20 within a statewide system, adjusted analyses indicated caregivers of youths with the most intensive needs were significantly less likely to report receiving care that embodied SOC principles, with deficits on six of nine items. Youths whose services embodied SOC principles experienced significantly greater improvement in caregiver-reported functioning even after adjusting for level of need. Results highlight disparities in SOC principles for youths with intensive needs and the need for policy and intervention development to improve care for this population.