Ingenol mebutate gel for actinic keratosis: the link between quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and clinical outcomes

Safety of topical interventions for the treatment of actinic keratosis

Introduction: Actinic keratosis (AK) are proliferations of atypical keratinocytes that may eventually progress to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, AK requires consequent and early treatment. Areas covered: A variety of effective approaches is currently available for the clearance of AK. These interventions may be applied either in a lesion-directed or field-directed mode as AK can occur as single or multiple lesions. Field-directed approaches typically comprise topical drug-mediated interventions which aim at eliminating all visible lesions and also at clearing subclinical changes of the actinically damaged field. However, most treatment options are associated with local adverse events such as erythema, scaling, pain, and rarely with systemic symptoms. This expert review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the safety considerations of the commonly prescribed topical treatment agents cyclooxygenase inhibitors, 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, and photodynamic therapy. All these therapies have been proven efficient, yet they differ considerably regarding their safety profile. Expert opinion: In the future, safety concerns will relate to long-term and irreversible adverse drug events instead of application site reactions. In particular, the rate of treatment-associated non-melanoma skin cancers will increasingly come into focus and warrant investigation in postmarketing surveillance trials with a long-term follow-up.

Patient-reported outcomes of topical therapies in actinic keratosis: A systematic review

Patients' perspectives on actinic keratosis treatments may have an impact on treatment adherence and, therefore, therapeutic outcomes. We performed a systematic review to assess patients' perspectives of topical, field‐directed treatments for actinic keratoses. A literature search was conducted, and 14 studies were identified encompassing 4433 patients. Only four studies were focused on face and/or scalp, which are the locations that typically impact patients' quality of life. Four studies were clinical trials. One study utilized a validated patient‐reported outcomes (PRO) instrument specifically developed for actinic keratosis. In general, treatment adherence and patient satisfaction were better with shorter‐duration treatment regimens such as ingenol mebutate gel. Imiquimod improved quality of life in one study but not in another. No data was available on topical piroxicam. The findings underscore the need for effective and well‐tolerated, short‐duration topical treatment for actinic keratosis.

Clinical utility of ingenol mebutate in the management of actinic keratosis: perspectives from clinical practice

Actinic keratoses (AKs) are epidermal cutaneous neoplasia observed predominantly in middle-aged and older subjects with mainly photo type I and photo type II on sun-exposed surfaces as a result of DNA damage. AKs have historically been characterized as being "precancerous"; however, now it is considered by many authors a carcinoma in situ that can persist or progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with metastatic potential. Despite the advances in the recognition of typical clinic, dermoscopic and histologic patterns, currently it is not yet possible to predict which AKs will progress to SCC. For this reason, early diagnosis and effective therapy are recommended based on cost/risk/benefit analysis. Current treatment consists of lesion-directed or field-directed therapies or a combination of both. Among the topical field therapies, ingenol mebutate stands out for its therapeutic efficacy, both as directed lesion therapy and as field directed therapy. The aim of this review is to demonstrate the utility of ingenol mebutate in the management of AK in daily clinical practice and to highlight data from real world in order to confirm evidence from pivotal studies. In order to explore clinical data from real world, PubMed searches were performed with the search terms "clinical data ingenol mebutate" and "real world ingenol mebutate". The hits were examined for relevant articles using defaults criteria. The timeframe for the sample search started from the first publication on this topic in 2008 up to now. A total of 23 articles were found using the keywords specified above. The overview points out a low number of real-life studies on the effectiveness and tolerability of this novel treatment due to short period of clinical experience for its recent approval. Further real-life studies are required in order to better identify the efficacy, safety and adherence of the drug on a larger population.

Effect of ingenol mebutate on actinic keratosis in a Korean population: A prospective clinical, dermoscopic and histopathological study from a single center

Actinic keratosis (AK) is an in situ squamous cell carcinoma which is mostly found on sun-damaged skin, and it is prevalent among Caucasians. However, there is a lack of research on evaluating the treatment efficacy of ingenol mebutate (IM) on AK in Asians. This study was intended to analyze the treatment outcomes of IM on AK in Korean patients with regards to clinical, dermoscopic and histopathological aspects. A prospective study on 46 Korean patients who were diagnosed with AK and treated with IM was conducted. Clinically, 80% (24/30) of the patients showed an improvement at 8 weeks. Twenty out of the 30 (66.7%) patients were found to have achieved histopathological clearance. All local skin responses had disappeared at T4 in all patients. Patients with Fitzpatrick skin type III were proven to exhibit better treatment outcomes, both clinically (P = 0.001) and histopathologically (P = 0.001), than those with Fitzpatrick skin type IV. The clinical and histopathological clearance rate of AK with IM in Korean patients was 80% and 66.7%, respectively. The patients with Fitzpatrick skin type IV showed a tendency to have residual AK, histopathologically after treatment with IM. In conclusion, IM could be an effective and safe treatment option on AK in Korean patients. In addition, it would be helpful to carry out a cautious check-up when treating AK with IM in patients with a darker skin color.

A multicentre, open, investigator-initiated phase IV clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ingenol mebutate gel, 0·015% on the face and scalp, and 0·05% on the trunk and extremities, in Korean patients with actinic keratosis (PERFECT)

BACKGROUND

Ingenol mebutate gel is a novel, field-directed topical treatment for actinic keratosis (AK). Most pivotal studies have targeted Western populations. No clinical study has been conducted to investigate its efficacy and safety in Asian populations.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ingenol mebutate gel for treating AK of face/scalp and trunk/extremities in a large Asian (Korean) population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicentre, open-label, interventional, parallel-group, prospective phase IV study (PERFECT, trial registration no.: NCT02716714), the eligible patients were allocated into either the face/scalp or the trunk/extremities group, according to their selected treatment area location. After application of ingenol mebutate gel, the participants were followed up for 6 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete clearance (CC) of AK lesions in the selected treatment area at day 57. Quality of life was evaluated using Skindex-29. Safety endpoints included local skin responses, scar, pigmentation, pain and adverse events.

RESULTS

In total, 78·1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 66·86-86·92%] of subjects had CC at day 57, with 76·6% (95% CI 64·31-86·25%) in the face/scalp group and 88·9% (95% CI 51·75-99·72%) in the trunk/extremities group. Among them, CC was sustained in 88·9% (48 of 54, 95% CI 77·37-95·81%) at month 6. The local skin responses significantly increased 1 day after the treatment compared with baseline, and decreased afterwards. Among the total subjects, 7·8% (6 of 77) had hyperpigmentation on the application area. Scars were not reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Ingenol mebutate is effective for the treatment of AK in Asians, with tolerable safety profiles.

Quality of Life, Behaviour and Attitudes towards Actinic Keratosis in Spain: The PIQA Study

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed to examine patients' knowledge, behaviours and attitudes regarding actinic keratosis (AK) lesions and the impact of the disease on patients' quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

Observational study of patients with AK lesions in Spain. QoL was evaluated with the validated version of Spanish AKQoL questionnaire. Skin self-examination, sun-exposure, habits and attitudes towards AK's treatment were recorded using different questionnaires. The adherence was assessed by means of the Morisky-Green test. Among other variables, QoL and adherence to treatment were compared by using Pearson's χ² test and one-way ANOVA tests. Inferential analysis regarding such factors and length of treatment were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1240 patients (73.6 [10.5] years old) were recruited. Overall, patients that showed higher levels of concern were also showed a higher impairment on QoL. AK had greater effects on women's QoL and those who performed skin self-examination, think that AK is a disease and/or believe that moisturizers can prevent skin aging (P<.05). Adherence and length of treatment were strongly related, since patients with treatments intended for <1week were more likely to show good adherence and complete remission of AK (Odds Ratio [95%CI]: 6.25 [4.55-8.33] and 2.63 [1.96-3.45]), respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Concerns due to AK are mainly related to sex and to the consideration of AK as a disease. More concerned patients tend to have lower QoL and good adherence to treatment. Short length of treatment was associated with better adherence and complete remission of AK lesions.

Phase IV head-to-head randomized controlled trial comparing ingenol mebutate 0·015% gel with diclofenac sodium 3% gel for the treatment of actinic keratosis on the face or scalp

BACKGROUND

Ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) and diclofenac sodium (DS) are approved treatments for actinic keratosis (AK).

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of IngMeb 0·015% gel with DS 3% gel (NCT02406014).

METHODS

Patients with 4-8 visible, discrete AK lesions on the face/scalp in a 25 cm² contiguous area of skin were randomized 1:1 to IngMeb once-daily for three consecutive days or DS twice-daily for 90 days. Patients with AK lesions at Week 8 following IngMeb were offered a second IngMeb course. Primary end point was complete clearance of AK lesions (AKCLEAR 100) at end of first treatment course (Week 8, IngMeb; Week 17, DS). Secondary end points included AKCLEAR 100 at end of last treatment course and Week 17; adverse events (AEs) were assessed at these time points. Patients completed treatment satisfaction questionnaires for medication (TSQM; Week 17).

RESULTS

AKCLEAR 100 at end of first treatment course was higher with IngMeb (34%) vs. DS (23%; P = 0·006). AKCLEAR 100 at end of last IngMeb course (53%) and Week 17 (45%) was higher than DS (both P < 0·001). The most frequent AE was application-site erythema (IngMeb 19%; DS 12%). Treatment-related AE (TRAE) duration was shorter with IngMeb. TRAE withdrawals were lower for IngMeb (2%) vs. DS (6%). TSQM scores for global satisfaction (P < 0·001) and effectiveness (P = 0·002) were higher with IngMeb, as was dosing instruction adherence (≥ 90% vs. 70%).

CONCLUSIONS

AKCLEAR 100, patient treatment satisfaction and effectiveness were significantly higher with IngMeb compared with DS, demonstrating superiority of IngMeb for AK treatment on face/scalp.

Factors influencing response to ingenol mebutate therapy for actinic keratosis of face and scalp

AIM

To determine factors independently influencing response to ingenol mebutate therapy and assess efficacy on clinical setting of non-hypertrophic non-hyperkeratotic actinic keratosis (AK).

METHODS

Consecutive patients affected by non-hypertrophic non-hyperkeratotic AKs of the face or scalp were enrolled to receive ingenol mebutate 0.015% gel on a selected skin area of 25 cm² for 3 consecutive days. Local skin reactions were calculated at each follow up visit using a validated composite score. Efficacy was evaluated by the comparison of clinical and dermoscopic pictures before the treatment and at day 57, and classified as complete, partial and poor response.

RESULTS

A number of 130 patients were enrolled, of which 101 (77.7%) were treated on the face, while 29 (22.3%) on the scalp. The great majority of our study population (n = 119, 91.5%) reached at least a 75% clearance of AKs and, in particular, 58 patients (44.6%) achieved a complete response while 61 (46.9%) a partial one. Logistic backward multivariate analysis showed that facial localization, level of local skin reaction (LSR) at day 2, the highest LSR values and level of crusts at day 8 were factors independently associated with the achievement of a complete response.

CONCLUSION

Ingenol mebutate 0.015% gel, when properly applied, is more effective on the face than on the scalp and efficacy is directly associated to LSR score.

The importance of patient-centred care to overcome barriers in the management of actinic keratosis

Visible actinic keratosis (AK) lesions and subclinical (non-visible) sun damage in the field of cancerization are associated with risk of both non-melanoma skin cancer, including basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and, more rarely, melanoma. As the incidences of AK and skin cancer are increasing, effective prevention and treatment of AK is essential to minimize disease burden and improve patient quality of life. Currently, AK lesions are often left untreated and field therapies are underused. Patient-centred care, with a focus on the patient-physician relationship, has proven cost-effective, and improved clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in a number of therapy areas. Strategies for applying patient-centred care to AK are warranted. Existing barriers to the effective treatment of AK were identified and patient-centric strategies to overcome each barrier were discussed. Barriers to effective AK treatment include poor disease awareness (for both patient and physician), concerns associated with the cosmetic effects of treatment, treatment-related side effects, cost perceptions for lesion-directed vs field-directed therapies, and inadequate adherence, particularly with long treatment duration. Overcoming these barriers will involve patient and physician education that promotes: disease prevention and awareness; the importance of self-examination; an understanding of treatment options; and the importance of adherence to treatment. To maximize its effectiveness, education should be delivered within a patient-centric framework, where the relationship between patient and physician is built on effective communication, empathy and a feeling of partnership. Patient-centric care, including patient education, is key to overcoming the barriers associated with effective AK treatment.

Pain during topical photodynamic therapy - comparing methyl aminolevulinate (Metvix®) to aminolaevulinic acid (Ameluz®); an intra-individual clinical study

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratoses are often treated by photodynamic therapy. However, the main side effect of this treatment is pain during and shortly after illumination.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate, in an intra-individual study, whether the pain response differ in treatment of actinic keratoses in scalp and forhead, using branded methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) and aminolaevulinic acid (ALA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with mild to moderate actinic keratoses on forehead and scalp were treated with methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL)-PDT and aminolaevulinic acid (ALA)-PDT on two similar areas of forehead and scalp. The pain response were measured using visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10 during the illumination and 30min after the treatment.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients completed treatment to MAL and ALA-PDT. We found no significant difference in pain intensity between MAL and ALA-PDT, neither during the treatment (p-value=1) nor 30min after the treatment (p-value of 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

This intra-individual study demonstrate no significant difference between the pain response during PDT using methyl aminolevulinate and aminolaevulinic acid.

Patient-reported outcomes in topical field treatment of actinic keratosis in Swedish and Danish patients

Topical treatments in dermatology can be long, complex and lead to nonadherence and nonpersistence to prescribed treatment. Clinical efficacy observed in randomized clinical trials (RCT) may therefore be reduced in real-world clinical practice. The objective of this study was to analyze patient-reported treatment adherence, treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with topical treatments of actinic keratosis (AK) in routine clinical practice in Denmark and Sweden. Adult patients prescribed field-directed topical AK treatments with diclofenac gel, imiquimod or ingenol mebutate per routine clinical practice were eligible for the observational RAPID-ACT study. Data were collected through physician and patient questionnaires that included validated instruments to measure treatment satisfaction (TSQM-9), treatment adherence (MMAS) and HRQoL (EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS, AKQoL). In total, 446 patients from Denmark and Sweden were included. Ingenol mebutate patients reported a higher satisfaction with treatment effectiveness compared to patients treated with diclofenac (p = .006) while no other differences in treatment satisfaction could be determined. Treatment adherence was generally high, but higher for ingenol mebutate compared to both diclofenac (p < .001) and imiquimod (p = .007), possibly due to shorter treatment duration. No differences in improved HRQoL were found. More research is needed about the link between treatment adherence and real-world effectiveness.

Patient satisfaction and reported outcomes on the management of actinic keratosis

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common dermatologic condition in which hyperplastic epidermal lesions develop in response to excessive and chronic exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. If left untreated, AK can progress to squamous cell carcinomas of the skin. Incidence is rising worldwide as a result of the progressive aging of populations and an increase in lifetime cumulative exposure to UV radiation. Currently, various treatment options exist, which range from topical medications to light-based therapies and procedural modalities. In this article, we will review the treatment options for AK with a focus on assessments of patient satisfaction with treatment.

Ingenol mebutate in low amounts for the treatment of actinic keratosis in Korean patients

Background

Ingenol mebutate (IM), a novel agent for field therapy of actinic keratosis (AK), has a drawback of inducing local skin reactions (LSRs), which may cause discomfort in patients. To reduce the LSRs, we tried the application of IM in low amounts.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to review Korean patients with AK being treated with IM and evaluate the LSRs and therapeutic outcomes of low amounts of IM.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 47 patients with AK on the face. A total of 20 and 27 patients were treated by applying recommended amount of 18.8 mg/cm² and the lower amount of 10 mg/cm², respectively.

Results

The mean composite LSR score for the low amount group (LAG; 12.18±3.29) was significantly lower than that for the recommended amount group (RAG; 15.45±2.70) (P<0.01, independent sample t-test). The 2-month clearance rate calculated by the number of AKs before and after treatment in each patient was significantly higher for RAG (88.16%), compared with 75.56% for LAG (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Low amount of IM for the treatment of facial AK significantly reduced LSRs in Korean patients. Minimizing LSRs may allow for a secondary targeting treatment of IM for the residual lesions, depending on initial treatment outcomes.

Management of actinic cheilitis using ingenol mebutate gel: A report of seven cases

Actinic cheilitis (AC) can precede the development of squamous cell carcinoma of the lip, a location with high risk of invasiveness and metastasis. We communicate the good results that we obtained when treating seven patients suffering from AC with ingenol mebutate (IM) 0,015% concentration gel on three consecutive days. Three patients achieved complete clearance and four significant improvement. IM is a topical field treatment approved for actinic keratosis. To our knowledge, reported experience in the management of AC with IM is very limited. Local skin responses grade 3 were the main adverse event observed and they resolved in all patients without specific therapy within 1 to 2 weeks. IM is characterized by its rapid clinical effect, its favorable safety profile and its dosing period of only 3 days, shorter than with other field therapies. All these facts make it an attractive new therapy for AC, with need for further study.

Actinic keratosis and field cancerization

While actinic keratoses (AKs) have been considered precancerous until recently for being able to turn into squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), it is now agreed that it would be more appropriate to call them cancerous. Although not all AKs turn into SCC and some of them may even have a spontaneous regression, there is an obvious association between SCC and AK. Approximately 90% of SCs have been reported to develop from AKs and AKs are the preinvasive form of SCCs. The presence of two or more AKs on a photodamaged skin is an indicator of field cancerization and represents an increased risk of invasive SCC. All lesions should be treated since it cannot be foreseen which of the lesions will regress and which will progress to SCC. AK can be a single lesion or it can involve multiple lesions in a field of cancerization; thus, AK treatment is grouped under two headings: (1) Lesion-specific treatment; and (2) Field-targeted treatment. Lesion-specific treatments are practicable in patients with a small number of clinically visible and isolated lesions. These treatments including cryotherapy, surgical excision, shave excision, curettage and laser are based on physical destruction of the visible lesions. Field-targeted treatments are effective in the treatment of visible lesions, subclinical lesions and keratinocyte changes in the areas surrounding the visible lesions. Field targeted treatment options are topical imiquimod cream, 5% 5-fluorouracil cream, ingenol mebutate, diclofenac gel, resimiquimod and photodynamic therapy.

Improved patient satisfaction using ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% for the treatment of facial actinic keratoses: a prospective pilot study

Actinic keratoses (AKs), especially on areas of the face, have a negative impact on a patient’s quality of life (QoL). These lesions manifest on sun-damaged skin and have the potential to progress to squamous cell carcinoma. Field-directed therapy alone and in combination with lesion-directed treatment is effective in clearing both visible and nonvisible AK lesions. Topical treatments of AKs thus have the potential to improve a patient’s well-being. However, evidence demonstrating improvements in patient QoL is limited, and is mostly based on observational or retrospective studies. Some prospective studies have reported unchanged or even worsening QoL despite excellent treatment outcomes. Our prospective, pilot study demonstrated a significant increase in QoL in 28 subjects with AKs of the face treated with ingenol mebutate gel 0.015%. QoL was assessed at days 0 and 60 using the Skindex-16 survey. Mean overall scores improved from 24.5% at baseline to 15.5% at day 60 (P=0.031). Improvements in QoL were consistent with an 80% reduction in AK lesion number at day 60. These improved QoL findings are in line with those from a recent retrospective study using ingenol mebutate 0.015% gel. This study therefore further demonstrates the potential for field therapy to improve both treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Ingenane Diterpenoids

Despite a more recent isolation and chemical characterization when compared to phorbol, along with its chemical instability, limited distribution in Nature, and scarce availability, ingenol is the only Euphorbia diterpenoid that has undergone successful pharmaceutical development, with ingenol 3-angelate (ingenol mebutate, Picato(®)) entering the pharmaceutical market in 2012 for the treatment of actinic keratosis. The phytochemical, chemical, and biological literature on members of the ingenane class of diterpenoids is reviewed from their first isolation in 1968 through 2015, highlighting unresolved issues both common to phorboids (biogenesis, relationship between molecular targets, and in vivo activity) and specific to ingenol derivatives (two-dimensional representation, in-out stereoisomerism, versatility of binding mode to PKC, and inconsistencies in the structural elucidation of some classes of derivatives). The biogenesis of ingenol is discussed in the light of the Jakupovic proposal of a dissection between the formation of the macrocyclic Euphorbia diterpenoids and the phorboids, and the clinical development of ingenol mebutate is chronicled in the light of its "reverse-pharmacology" focus.

Safety and tolerability of ingenol mebutate in the treatment of actinic keratosis

INTRODUCTION

Ingenol mebutate is a topical therapeutic agent for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). It has a novel mode of action and has shown comparable efficacy to other topical field therapies. This article summarizes and provides perspective on the safety profile of ingenol mebutate from clinical studies of this agent.

AREAS COVERED

The unique mechanism of action of ingenol mebutate, the basis for a rapid clinical effect, is outlined. Safety and tolerability data, including mean composite local skin response (LSR) scores, type of LSR, and adverse events from a range of clinical studies both in healthy volunteers and patients with AK, are reviewed. The safety profile of ingenol mebutate is then compared with other agents used to treat AK lesions.

EXPERT OPINION

Ingenol mebutate has a dosing period of 2 - 3 days, which is short compared with other field therapies, and there is no evidence of systemic absorption. The fact that most of the LSRs observed are mild to moderate in intensity and transient, with a majority resolved within 2 weeks, makes for a favorable safety profile. Ingenol mebutate enhances the armamentarium available to the dermatologist for the treatment of AK.