Identification and validation of a glycolysis-related taxonomy for improving outcomes in glioma

BACKGROUND

Reprogramming of glucose metabolism is a prominent abnormal energy metabolism in glioma. However, the efficacy of treatments targeting glycolysis varies among patients. The present study aimed to classify distinct glycolysis subtypes (GS) of glioma, which may help to improve the therapy response.

METHODS

The expression profiles of glioma were downloaded from public datasets to perform an enhanced clustering analysis to determine the GS. A total of 101 combinations based on 10 machine learning algorithms were performed to screen out the most valuable glycolysis-related glioma signature (GGS). Through RSF and plsRcox algorithms, adrenomedullin (ADM) was eventually obtained as the most significant glycolysis-related gene for prognostic prediction in glioma. Furthermore, drug sensitivity analysis, molecular docking, and in vitro experiments were utilized to verify the efficacy of ADM and ingenol mebutate (IM).

RESULTS

Glioma patients were classified into five distinct GS (GS1-GS5), characterized by varying glycolytic metabolism levels, molecular expression, immune cell infiltration, immunogenic modulators, and clinical features. Anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies significantly improved the prognosis for GS2 and GS5, respectively. ADM has been identified as a potential biomarker for targeted glycolytic therapy in glioma patients. In vitro experiments demonstrated that IM inhibited glioma cell progression by inhibiting ADM.

CONCLUSION

This study elucidates that evaluating GS is essential for comprehending the heterogeneity of glioma, which is pivotal for predicting immune cell infiltration (ICI) characterization, prognosis, and personalized immunotherapy regimens. We also explored the glycolysis-related genes ADM and IM to develop a theoretical framework for anti-tumor strategies targeting glycolysis.

Comparative efficacy of treatments for molluscum contagiosum: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Various interventions have been applied to treat molluscum contagiosum, but benefits and efficacy remain unclear. To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of interventions for molluscum contagiosum, a network meta-analysis was performed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published between January 1, 1990, and November 31, 2020. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of interventions in immunocompetent children and adults with genital/non-genital molluscum contagiosum lesions.

RESULTS

Twelve interventions from 25 RCTs including 2,123 participants were assessed. Compared with the placebo, ingenol mebutate had the most significant effect on complete clearance (odds ratio [OR] 117.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.37-2164.88), followed by cryotherapy (OR 16.81, 95% CI 4.13-68.54), podophyllotoxin (OR 10.24, 95% CI 3.36-31.21), and potassium hydroxide (KOH) (OR 10.02, 95% CI 4.64-21.64). Data on adverse effects were too scarce for quantitative synthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Ingenol mebutate, cryotherapy, podophyllotoxin, and KOH were more effective than the other interventions in achieving complete clearance, but safety concerns regarding ingenol mebutate have recently been reported. Due to the possibility of spontaneous resolution, observation is also justified for asymptomatic infection. Factors including adverse effects, cost, patient preference, and medical accessibility should be considered.

Ingenol Mebutate Is Associated With Increased Reporting Odds for Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Actinic Keratosis Patients, a Pharmacovigilance Study of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

BACKGROUND

Recently the production and marketing of ingenol mebutate in the European Union (EU) and Canada was halted due to a possible increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in patients with actinic keratosis (AK).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between SCC and topical AK medications including ingenol mebutate in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

Case/non-case analyses were performed in FAERS using data from 2012 to 2020 to examine the reporting odds ratio (ROR) signal for SCC for ingenol mebutate and all classes of topical AK medications under multiple conditions: i. comparison to all other drugs in FAERs, ii. comparison to other topical AK medications, iii. comparison to all other topical AK medications where only a single agent was implicated, iv. comparison of ingenol mebutate vs. imiquimod.

RESULTS

A statistically significant ROR for SCC was found for ingenol mebutate under all conditions (i. 31.57 (25.45, 39.16), ii. 50.35 (32.21, 78.82), iii 61.09 (35.36, 105.56), iv. 2.53 (1.27, 5.05). A significant but substantially smaller signal was observed for imiquimod (i. 12.38 (6.42, 32.84), ii. 5.18 (2.61, 10.26), iii 5.42 (2.49, 11.78), but not for fluorouracil or diclofenac. When compared to imiquimod directly, ingenol mebutate had a statistically significant ROR for SCC (2.53 (1.27, 5.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings support an association between SCC and ingenol mebutate. This association is maintained under controls to limit bias and falsely elevated signal including controlling for disease state and cases with multiple drug exposures and when compared to imiquimod as in Phase IV studies of ingenol mebutate.

Influence of serum vitamin D level in the response of actinic keratosis to ingenol mebutate

Vitamin D (VD) serum levels, and keratinocytic basal expression of vitamin D receptor (VDR) before treatment of actinic keratoses (AK) have been previously reported as possible biomarkers of the response of AK to treatments. We intended to evaluate the association between these and other serum and immunohistochemical parameters with the response of AK to treatment with topical ingenol mebutate (IM). Twenty-five patients with AK on the head were treated with topical IM 0.015% gel once daily for 3 days. Biopsies were taken at baseline and 6 weeks after treatment. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for VDR, P53, Ki67, Aurora B, Survivin and β-catenin. Basal serum 25(OH)D levels were determined. IM was more effective for KIN I and II AKs than in KIN III, and histological responders showed significantly higher serum VD levels (30.278 [SD 8.839] ng/mL) than nonresponders (21.14 [SD 7.079] ng/mL, p = 0.023). In addition, mean basal expression of VDR (45.63 [SD 16.105] %) increased significantly (57.92 [SD 14.738] %, p = 0.003) after treatment with IM. A significant decrease after treatment in the expression of several markers of aggressiveness and progression to squamous cell carcinoma, namely P53, Ki-67, aurora B kinase and survivin, was also observed. Our results support a relationship between VD status and the response of AK to treatment with topical IM, suggesting that its previous correction to proper serum levels in VD-deficient patients could improve the response of AK to the treatment.

Approaches to Field Therapy for Actinic Keratoses: Relating Clinical Trial Results to Real-world Practice-A Commentary

There have been multiple direct and indirect comparison studies evaluating different field therapies used in the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). A recent clinical trial directly compared 5% fluorouracil (5-FU), imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, and methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT), reporting that 5-FU was superior to the other treatments in achieving sustained clearance of 75 percent or greater of AK lesions compared to baseline. In this commentary, the author reviews and discusses the methods and results of this comparison study and propose these results are limited by a number of factors, such as the selected primary % clearance endpoint, grade range of included AKs, and treatments included in the comparison, when considered in the context of other clinical and real-world comparison studies evaluating AK field therapies. The author postulates that patient acceptance of and adherence to field therapy regimens for the treatment of AK may be better evaluated in a real-world setting. Additionally, the author suggests that selection of field therapy in the treatment of AK should be driven by consideration of relevant patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors, and what is considered best may differ from patient to patient, depending on each patient's individual needs and expectations.

Safety of topical interventions for the treatment of actinic keratosis

Introduction: Actinic keratosis (AK) are proliferations of atypical keratinocytes that may eventually progress to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, AK requires consequent and early treatment. Areas covered: A variety of effective approaches is currently available for the clearance of AK. These interventions may be applied either in a lesion-directed or field-directed mode as AK can occur as single or multiple lesions. Field-directed approaches typically comprise topical drug-mediated interventions which aim at eliminating all visible lesions and also at clearing subclinical changes of the actinically damaged field. However, most treatment options are associated with local adverse events such as erythema, scaling, pain, and rarely with systemic symptoms. This expert review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the safety considerations of the commonly prescribed topical treatment agents cyclooxygenase inhibitors, 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, and photodynamic therapy. All these therapies have been proven efficient, yet they differ considerably regarding their safety profile. Expert opinion: In the future, safety concerns will relate to long-term and irreversible adverse drug events instead of application site reactions. In particular, the rate of treatment-associated non-melanoma skin cancers will increasingly come into focus and warrant investigation in postmarketing surveillance trials with a long-term follow-up.

Discovery of Small Molecules for the Reversal of T Cell Exhaustion

Inhibitory receptors (IRs) function as critical regulators of immune responses by tempering T cell activity. In humans, several persisting viruses as well as cancers exploit IR signaling by upregulating IR ligands, resulting in suppression of T cell function (i.e., exhaustion). This allows escape from immune surveillance and continuation of disease. Here, we report the design, implementation, and results of a phenotypic high-throughput screen for molecules that modulate CD8⁺ T cell activity. We identify 19 compounds from the ReFRAME drug-repurposing collection that restore cytokine production and enhance the proliferation of exhausted T cells. Analysis of our top hit, ingenol mebutate, a protein kinase C (PKC) inducing diterpene ester, reveals a role for this molecule in overriding the suppressive signaling cascade mediated by IR signaling on T cells. Collectively, these results demonstrate a disease-relevant methodology for identifying modulators of T cell function and reveal new targets for immunotherapy.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Actinic Keratosis from Post-Marketing Surveillance Trials

Multiple interventions are available for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK) showing high efficacy in pivotal trials. However, data from post-marketing surveillance studies have received little attention until now. Here, we systematically investigate interventions for AK from post-marketing surveillance trials as a proxy for real-world efficacy and tolerability. A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL. Pertinent trial registers were hand-searched until 25 March 2020. Results were pooled using a random-effects model to calculate pooled proportions and relative risks (RR) or were described qualitatively. Eleven records with a total sample size of n = 4109 were included. Three of the studies had an active-controlled design, while seven were single-armed. Participant complete clearance ranged from 23.1% for diclofenac sodium 3% gel to 88.9% for ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel. The lesion-specific clearance rate for photodynamic therapy (PDT) was 74% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56–87%). The recurrence rate was significantly higher for diclofenac sodium 3% in comparison to imiquimod 5% cream (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02–1.1.8) and ranged from 10.6% for ingenol mebutate 0.015% gel to 23.5% for PDT. Few patients discontinued the trials due to adverse events. The results from the majority of the post-marketing surveillance studies deviated from those of pivotal trials.

Ingenol mebutate for the management of cryotherapy-resistant anogenital warts

Ingenol mebutate (IM), as an active compound, is derived from the sap of the Euphorbia peplus, which is an FDA-approved plant for the treatment of actinic keratosis. Some reports have demonstrated that the IM gel 0.05% is safe and effective in the treatment of external anogenital warts (AGWs) but the efficacy of the drug on the recalcitrant AGWs is not clear. This article assesses the efficacy and safety of the IM gel 0.05% for cryotherapy -resistant AGWs. Totally, 15 cryotherapy-resistant patients with AGWs (including 8 men and 7 women) and a mean age of 34 years old (age range of 23-50 years old) were enrolled in this study. IM gel 0.05% was applied carefully on the AGWs every two weeks for a maximum of three cycles. The complete clearance rate and recurrence rate were assessed 1 week and 3 months after the last treatment, respectively. Safety was assessed by the occurrence of local skin reaction and the severity of pain was evaluated using the 10-point Visual Analogue Scale. Initially, the AGWs were cleared completely in 10 (66%) patients while 4 (40%) and all of (100%) the patients experienced a recurrence in the 3- and 12-months follow-ups, respectively. All the 15 patients experienced some degrees of pain and local adverse reactions. The mean score of the reported pain was equal to 5.87 ± 2.39. The use of IM gel 0.05% in the treatment of the difficult-to-treat cases of AGWs is associated with a high recurrence rate despite the initial rapid and effective clearance of the lesions. Also, the high level of local adverse reactions and severe pain are other prohibitive factors in the treatment of recalcitrant AGWs with the IM.

Ingenol mebutate treatment in actinic keratosis - clinical effectiveness and potential side effects

Introduction

Actinic keratosis is a common skin disease that occurs in response to prolonged exposure to ultraviolet radiation. This problem affects up to 60% of the population over 40 years of age. Actinic keratosis is considered to be a precancerous lesion leading to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The new therapeutic option for the treatment of actinic keratosis is ingenol mebutate gel (0.015%, 0.05%).

Aim

Retrospective evaluation of response and potential side effects of ingenol mebutate treatment in clinical practice.

Material and methods

Eight patients with actinic keratosis lesions on the face or scalp self-applied a 0.015% gel for 3 consecutive days on the 25 cm² marked area. They were assessed at baseline and on day 4, 7, 14 and 57.

Results

All patients on day 57 presented a complete absence of AK lesions in the area of ingenol mebutate application. No adverse events were observed.

Conclusions

Our study shows that ingenol mebutate is highly efficacious field treatment for actinic keratosis.

Treatment responder analysis in actinic keratosis: can it lead the way to individualized choice of treatment?

BACKGROUND

It is unclear if there are any distinct AK patient populations that might respond best to a given treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To identify if a distinct subgroup of patients with AK might respond better to treatment with ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) versus diclofenac sodium (DS).

METHODS

Complete clearance of AK and mean lesion reduction at end of first treatment course and week 17 were evaluated within subgroups.

RESULTS

502 patients (255 IngMeb; 247 DS) were included in the analysis. At week 17, complete clearance was achieved by more patients treated with IngMeb versus DS within the majority of patient subgroups, including patients with <6 lesions and ≥6 lesions at baseline, aged ≥65 years, males, females, Fitzpatrick skin types II and III, and facial lesions. Mean lesion reduction at week 17 was greater with IngMeb than DS within the same subgroups, and in patients with scalp lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

This responder analysis did not identify any distinct population that responded more optimally than others with IngMeb or DS. More patients achieved complete clearance and higher lesion reduction of AK with IngMeb compared with DS in most subgroups.

Efficacy and safety of ingenol mebutate gel in field treatment of actinic keratosis on full face, balding scalp, or approximately 250 cm2 on the chest: A phase 3 randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) 0.015% or 0.05% is approved for actinic keratosis (AK) areas of 25 cm² or less; some patients require treatment of larger fields.

OBJECTIVE

To determine efficacy and safety of IngMeb 0.027% in areas of AK of up to 250 cm² during an 8-week initial assessment period and extended 12-month follow-up.

METHODS

This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial (NCT02361216) enrolled adult patients with 5 to 20 AK lesions on the face/scalp (25-250 cm²) or chest (approximately 250 cm²). Patients received once-daily IngMeb or vehicle for 3 consecutive days on the full face, full balding scalp, or approximately 250 cm² on the chest. The primary endpoint was complete AK clearance (AKCLEAR 100; week 8). Additional endpoints included partial AK clearance (AKCLEAR 75), recurrence, patient satisfaction, cosmetic outcome, and safety.

RESULTS

IngMeb was superior to vehicle for complete AK clearance (21.4% vs 3.4%, P < .001) and AK clearance of 75% or greater (59.4% vs 8.9%, P < .001) at week 8. Probability of sustained clearance during the 12-month follow-up was 22.9% for patients treated with IngMeb. Increased treatment satisfaction and cosmetic outcomes were observed with IngMeb versus vehicle. No unexpected safety signals were identified.

LIMITATIONS

Localized skin responses hindered maintenance of double-blinding.

CONCLUSIONS

IngMeb 0.027% was superior to vehicle for treatment of AK areas of up to 250 cm². The safety profile of IngMeb was as expected.

Non-invasive monitoring of subclinical and clinical actinic keratosis of face and scalp under topical treatment with ingenol mebutate gel 150 mcg/g by means of reflectance confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography: New perspectives and comparison of diagnostic techniques

Actinic keratosis (AK) corresponds to the earliest stage of in situ squamous cell carcinoma and arises on chronically sun-exposed skin. Around the clinically evident AKs, the apparently healthy epidermis may contain different grades of atypia that can be detected by noninvasive imaging techniques such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Subclinical actinic keratosis (sAK) has captured increasing interest as a potential target of field therapies. The aim of this study was to evaluate in vivo the changes in the field cancerization undergoing treatment with topical ingenol mebutate by combining RCM and OCT. Twenty patients with field cancerization of the face and scalp were treated with ingenol mebutate gel (150 mcg/g) for three consecutive days on an area of 25 cm² containing at least two AKs, two sAKs and two apparently healthy sites. About 120 lesions were evaluated through clinical investigation and clinical, dermoscopical, RCM and OCT images at day 0, 4, 14 and 56 based on the diagnostic criteria for AKs. Main pathological features improved in both AKs and sAKs, in particular the epidermal thickness measured by OCT and the epidermal atypia graded by RCM. Local skin reactions (LSR) arose predominantly in the lesional area compared with healthy skin. A complete clearance was detected in 58% for AKs, and in 55% and 72% for sAKs measured by RCM and OCT, respectively. Both OCT and RCM allow the morphological representation of field cancerization including subclinical lesions and provide complementary information. Ingenol mebutate is effective not only in clinically evident but also in sAKs. The differences in LSR highlight the potential selectivity of the treatment.

Successful treatment of condylomata acuminata at the urethral meatus with high-dose ingenol mebutate gel: Report of two cases

Condylomata acuminata (CA), or anogenital warts, is the most common sexually transmitted infection. Treatments for CA generally have suboptimal recurrence rates, which results in a need for repeated treatments and adds to the already negative impact on the patients’ quality of life. CA can present at the urethral meatus, which is a particularly challenging anatomic location from a therapeutic perspective. We report two cases of CA at the urethral meatus successfully treated with topical application of high-dose ingenol mebutate gel.

Clinical utility of ingenol mebutate in the management of actinic keratosis: perspectives from clinical practice

Actinic keratoses (AKs) are epidermal cutaneous neoplasia observed predominantly in middle-aged and older subjects with mainly photo type I and photo type II on sun-exposed surfaces as a result of DNA damage. AKs have historically been characterized as being "precancerous"; however, now it is considered by many authors a carcinoma in situ that can persist or progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with metastatic potential. Despite the advances in the recognition of typical clinic, dermoscopic and histologic patterns, currently it is not yet possible to predict which AKs will progress to SCC. For this reason, early diagnosis and effective therapy are recommended based on cost/risk/benefit analysis. Current treatment consists of lesion-directed or field-directed therapies or a combination of both. Among the topical field therapies, ingenol mebutate stands out for its therapeutic efficacy, both as directed lesion therapy and as field directed therapy. The aim of this review is to demonstrate the utility of ingenol mebutate in the management of AK in daily clinical practice and to highlight data from real world in order to confirm evidence from pivotal studies. In order to explore clinical data from real world, PubMed searches were performed with the search terms "clinical data ingenol mebutate" and "real world ingenol mebutate". The hits were examined for relevant articles using defaults criteria. The timeframe for the sample search started from the first publication on this topic in 2008 up to now. A total of 23 articles were found using the keywords specified above. The overview points out a low number of real-life studies on the effectiveness and tolerability of this novel treatment due to short period of clinical experience for its recent approval. Further real-life studies are required in order to better identify the efficacy, safety and adherence of the drug on a larger population.

Effect of ingenol mebutate on actinic keratosis in a Korean population: A prospective clinical, dermoscopic and histopathological study from a single center

Actinic keratosis (AK) is an in situ squamous cell carcinoma which is mostly found on sun-damaged skin, and it is prevalent among Caucasians. However, there is a lack of research on evaluating the treatment efficacy of ingenol mebutate (IM) on AK in Asians. This study was intended to analyze the treatment outcomes of IM on AK in Korean patients with regards to clinical, dermoscopic and histopathological aspects. A prospective study on 46 Korean patients who were diagnosed with AK and treated with IM was conducted. Clinically, 80% (24/30) of the patients showed an improvement at 8 weeks. Twenty out of the 30 (66.7%) patients were found to have achieved histopathological clearance. All local skin responses had disappeared at T4 in all patients. Patients with Fitzpatrick skin type III were proven to exhibit better treatment outcomes, both clinically (P = 0.001) and histopathologically (P = 0.001), than those with Fitzpatrick skin type IV. The clinical and histopathological clearance rate of AK with IM in Korean patients was 80% and 66.7%, respectively. The patients with Fitzpatrick skin type IV showed a tendency to have residual AK, histopathologically after treatment with IM. In conclusion, IM could be an effective and safe treatment option on AK in Korean patients. In addition, it would be helpful to carry out a cautious check-up when treating AK with IM in patients with a darker skin color.

Nodular basal cell carcinoma of the face successfully treated with ingenol mebutate 0.015% gel

Surgical excision is the first-choice treatment for basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Other treatments with topical agents such as 5-fluorouracil or imiquimod have also been suggested for use in superficial BCC (sBCC). Ingenol mebutate (IM) is a novel agent employed in the treatment of superficial actinic keratoses. The drug has been also successfully used in the treatment of sBCC. A case of large nodular BCC (nBCC) of the face in a 100-year-old inoperable woman is described. IM 0.015% gel was applied once daily for three consecutive days. This dose regimen was repeated for seven rounds within 11 months, with complete cure of the tumor. Mild local skin reactions, which were tolerated well, were observed. Selected cases of nBCC could be treated with IM gel, but the optimal concentration of the drug and the standard dose regimen of treatment are yet to be determined.

Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy for monitoring the treatment of actinic cheilitis with ingenol mebutate gel: Report of three cases

Actinic cheilitis (AC) can precede the development of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lip, a location with higher risk of invasiveness and metastasis. Herein, we reported the use of ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) 0.015% gel on three consecutive days to treat three patients suffering from AC. All the three patients achieved complete clearance of AC with rapid clinical effect, favorable safety profile, good patient's compliance related to short time of applications, and few local skin reactions. So IngMeb is an attractive new therapy for AC. Moreover, the present case report adds further evidence to the usefulness of dermoscopy and Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) in the assessment and monitoring of treatment outcome.

Plant Secondary Metabolites as Anticancer Agents: Successes in Clinical Trials and Therapeutic Application

Cancer is a multistage process resulting in an uncontrolled and abrupt division of cells and is one of the leading causes of mortality. The cases reported and the predictions for the near future are unthinkable. Food and Drug Administration data showed that 40% of the approved molecules are natural compounds or inspired by them, from which, 74% are used in anticancer therapy. In fact, natural products are viewed as more biologically friendly, that is less toxic to normal cells. In this review, the most recent and successful cases of secondary metabolites, including alkaloid, diterpene, triterpene and polyphenolic type compounds, with great anticancer potential are discussed. Focusing on the ones that are in clinical trial development or already used in anticancer therapy, therefore successful cases such as paclitaxel and homoharringtonine (in clinical use), curcumin and ingenol mebutate (in clinical trials) will be addressed. Each compound’s natural source, the most important steps in their discovery, their therapeutic targets, as well as the main structural modifications that can improve anticancer properties will be discussed in order to show the role of plants as a source of effective and safe anticancer drugs.

Noninvasive Long-term Monitoring of Actinic Keratosis and Field Cancerization Following Treatment with Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.015

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether actinic keratosis and photodamaged perilesional areas (field cancerization) treated successfully with topical ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% remained clear one year later, and to treat actinic keratosis and perilesional skin not treated one year earlier. DESIGN: Single-center, single-arm, open-label extension of an original clinical study completed one year earlier. SETTING: An outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen of the original 28 study patients enrolled in and who completed the extension phase. MEASUREMENTS: All treated and untreated lesions in the original study were evaluated clinically, dermoscopically, and with optical coherence tomography at Day 0 of the extension study. Previously untreated lesions were then treated with ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% for three days and reevaluated at Day 60. RESULTS: There was no significant increase in actinic keratoses over one year. The majority of actinic keratoses not treated in the original study were still present at the beginning of the extension study. Following treatment, 69 percent of these lesions cleared by Day 60 of the extension study, which was not significantly different from the 79 percent clearance observed in the original study. CONCLUSION: Ingenol mebutate 0.015% maintained clearance of lesions treated one year earlier. Optical coherence therapy demonstrated its reliability as a noninvasive mode of diagnosis for actinic keratosis as well as actinic damage in the surrounding areas of field cancerization. Optical coherence therapy also showed that previously untreated lesions exhibited similar clearance rates once treated with the medication.

Analysis of apoptosis-associated molecules Erythroid differentiation regulator 1, bcl-2 and p53 in actinic keratosis after treatment with ingenol mebutate

Actinic keratosis (AK) is the most common cutaneous premalignant neoplasm precursor of malignant skin tumors. The aberrant apoptotic pathway is thought to be associated with pathogenesis of AK. Ingenol mebutate has been shown to be effective and safe for treatment of AK. However, the effect of ingenol mebutate on apoptosis-related molecules using human skin samples has not been studied well. Erythroid differentiation regulator 1 (Erdr1) was recently reported to play a crucial role in malignant skin cancers like malignant melanoma. The role of Erdr1 in premalignant actinic keratosis (AK) has not been explored. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the expression of apoptosis-associated molecules such as Erdr1, p53 and bcl-2 was affected by the treatment of ingenol mebutate in AK. Nine patients with AK underwent skin biopsy at baseline and 8 weeks after treatment with ingenol mebutate for immunohistochemical evaluation with Erdr1, p53 and bcl-2. In addition, skin samples from five control subjects were retrieved. Upregulation of Erdr1 and a significant decrease in expression of p53 and bcl-2 were observed after treatment with ingenol mebutate. Ingenol mebutate treatment for AK resulted in the modulation of apoptosis-associated molecules with an increase in the expression of Erdr1 and a decrease in the expression of p53 and bcl-2.

Tattoo removal with ingenol mebutate

An increasing number of people are getting tattoos; however, many regret the decision and seek their removal. Lasers are currently the most commonly used method for tattoo removal; however, treatment can be lengthy, costly, and sometimes ineffective, especially for certain colors. Ingenol mebutate is a licensed topical treatment for actinic keratoses. Here, we demonstrate that two applications of 0.1% ingenol mebutate can efficiently and consistently remove 2-week-old tattoos from SKH/hr hairless mice. Treatment was associated with relocation of tattoo microspheres from the dermis into the posttreatment eschar. The skin lesion resolved about 20 days after treatment initiation, with some cicatrix formation evident. The implications for using ingenol mebutate for tattoo removal in humans are discussed.

Pharmacokinetics of ingenol mebutate gel under maximum use conditions in large treatment areas

PURPOSE

Actinic keratoses (AKs) exist on a continuum with squamous cell carcinoma and can occur as sub-clinical and clinically visible lesions in cancerized fields on sun-damaged skin. Ingenol mebutate effectively treats AKs on areas up to 25 cm², but actinic keratosis can affect larger areas of skin. This trial evaluated systemic exposure and safety of ingenol mebutate gel on larger areas of skin under maximum use conditions.

METHODS

Phase I, multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled, non-randomized trial. Patients received ingenol mebutate gel for three consecutive days on approximately 250 cm² of sun-damaged skin on the full face (0.027%), the scalp (0.027%), or arm (0.06%).

RESULTS

Of 61 patients, 10 (face =8; arm =2) had ingenol mebutate in whole blood at subnanomolar levels (0.235-0.462 nM). The assayed metabolites were below the lower limit of quantification. Local skin responses increased during Days 1-4 and declined thereafter, approaching baseline by Day 16. Most adverse events were pain/pruritus of mild or moderate intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

Subnanomolar systemic exposure to ingenol mebutate was measured after application of the gel to approximately 250 cm² on the full face, scalp, or arm under maximum use conditions. No clinically relevant systemic adverse reactions were observed, and local skin responses were manageable.

Ingenol mebutate in low amounts for the treatment of actinic keratosis in Korean patients

Background

Ingenol mebutate (IM), a novel agent for field therapy of actinic keratosis (AK), has a drawback of inducing local skin reactions (LSRs), which may cause discomfort in patients. To reduce the LSRs, we tried the application of IM in low amounts.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to review Korean patients with AK being treated with IM and evaluate the LSRs and therapeutic outcomes of low amounts of IM.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 47 patients with AK on the face. A total of 20 and 27 patients were treated by applying recommended amount of 18.8 mg/cm² and the lower amount of 10 mg/cm², respectively.

Results

The mean composite LSR score for the low amount group (LAG; 12.18±3.29) was significantly lower than that for the recommended amount group (RAG; 15.45±2.70) (P<0.01, independent sample t-test). The 2-month clearance rate calculated by the number of AKs before and after treatment in each patient was significantly higher for RAG (88.16%), compared with 75.56% for LAG (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Low amount of IM for the treatment of facial AK significantly reduced LSRs in Korean patients. Minimizing LSRs may allow for a secondary targeting treatment of IM for the residual lesions, depending on initial treatment outcomes.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluations in the treatment of actinic keratoses

Actinic keratoses (AKs) develop as a consequence of chronic ultraviolet (UV) exposure and exist on a continuum with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). As one of the most common conditions treated by dermatologists, AK places a significant burden on patients and the healthcare system. A range of treatments are used, including topical treatments that target the visible and subclinical lesions. The goal of such therapies is to achieve complete clearance of AKs and eliminate the risk of progression to SCC. Robust meta-analyses of trial data can provide valuable information for the optimal management of AK and cost-effectiveness evaluations of topical treatments, such as ingenol mebutate gel and diclofenac. These outcomes can facilitate prescribing physicians’ decisions and shape therapeutic guidelines. Peer-reviewed meta-analysis publications and treatment guidelines favoured ingenol mebutate efficacy over diclofenac and the relative cost-effectiveness of ingenol mebutate. We discuss and critique recent evidence, from a cost-effectiveness analysis of 3% diclofenac sodium and ingenol mebutate in the treatment of AK in Italy, which has challenged this view.

Relationship between severity of the local skin reactions and the rate of local skin reaction resolution in patients treated with ingenol mebutate gel

Background

Ingenol mebutate gel is a topical field treatment for actinic keratosis (AK). The treatment elicits application-site reactions in most patients. This analysis evaluated the relationship between the severity of reactions and the speed of their resolution.

Methods

Patients in Phase III studies were treated for AKs on the face (n=218), scalp (n=56), and trunk and extremities (n=209). All of the patients were treated with either ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% once daily for three consecutive days (face/scalp) or ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% once daily for two consecutive days (trunk/extremities). Local skin reactions (LSRs) were assessed on a 5-point scale from 0 to 4 in six categories, yielding composite scores in the range of 0 to 24.

Results

The composite LSR score on the day after the last application of ingenol mebutate gel was an important predictor of the speed of resolution of LSRs. The rate of resolution was greatest for AKs treated on the face, followed by the scalp, and then the trunk and extremities. All patients were expected to have minimal LSR scores for the face and scalp at 2 weeks, and for the trunk and extremities at 4 weeks.

Conclusion

The absolute reduction in LSR scores was proportional to the composite LSR score on the day after the last application of ingenol mebutate gel treatment. The rate of resolution for LSRs was dependent on the anatomic site treated as well as the day 4 composite score.

Treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma with ingenol mebutate gel, 0.05%

BACKGROUND

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common cancer in Caucasians. Surgical approaches are the most widely used and effective treatment strategies for well-defined BCC. However, for patients with low-risk, superficial BCCs (sBCCs), medical therapy may be a treatment option. In this small case series, we describe our experience in using topical treatment with ingenol mebutate gel, 0.05%, for patients who refused surgical treatment for sBCC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of seven patients from our community dermatology practice for whom sBCC was treated with ingenol mebutate. The chart review extracted information on demography, dermatologic history, and prior treatment for actinic keratosis or skin cancer. Summary of the treatment outcome with ingenol mebutate included the size and location of the sBCCs, description of administration, local skin reactions, adverse events, and efficacy.

RESULTS

Histopathologic analysis of a shave biopsy sample of suspicious lesions on the trunk confirmed nine sBCCs: a single sBCC in five patients and two well-separated lesions in each of the other two patients. Patients were treated at 10 to 14 days after shave biopsy; biopsy sites were not required to be fully healed. Lesions were either occluded using a standard adhesive bandage (n=6) or not occluded (n=3). All patients experienced local skin reactions that began on day 1 or 2 of treatment, peaked on days 2 to 7, and were largely resolved at 2 weeks. All sBCCs were clinically resolved on short-term follow-up at 2 to 4 weeks. Repeat biopsy of six lesion sites in four patients at 3 or 4 months confirmed histologic clearance. There were no clinically suspicious lesions in any patients at subsequent follow-up evaluations at 3-month intervals. The longest follow-up to date has been 14 months.

CONCLUSION

Ingenol mebutate gel, 0.05%, was efficacious and well tolerated for the treatment of biopsy-confirmed sBCCs on the trunk in seven patients.

Pharmacoeconomy of drugs used in the treatment of actinic keratoses

Actinic keratosis (AK) represents an emerging issue in the area of skin diseases which undergo high risk for developing squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Recently, evidence has been accumulated that 3% diclofenac sodium and ingenol mubetate may efficiently counteract the development of progressive AK even if the pharmacoeconomic impact of such a treatment remains poorly defined. With the objective of assessing the efficacy of 3% diclofenac sodium versus ingenol mebutate, a comparative cost-efficacy analysis was performed between both pharmacological treatments. In the present analysis, data of efficacy of clinical studies were combined with information on the quality of life associated with AK lesions based on available literature data. Furthermore, the cost associated with the management of these lesions in Italy has been taken into account. To this purpose, we carried out a literature survey on the clinical and economic data among clinical reports available in Italy based on the assessment of related expenditure of public resources and their relationship with the subsequent health benefits.

Daylight methyl-aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy versus ingenol mebutate for the treatment of actinic keratoses: an intraindividual comparative analysis

Daylight-photodynamic therapy (D-PDT) and ingenol mebutate (IM) are novel therapies directed to actinic keratoses (AK). The purpose of our study was to compare effectiveness, tolerability, cosmetic outcome and patient preference of D-PDT versus IM in the treatment of grade I and II AK. Twenty-seven patients with AK on the face or scalp were enrolled. Each patient received, in a 25 cm(2) target area, D-PDT on right side and IM on left side. Overall 323 AK were treated. Both target areas achieved complete response in 40.47% of the cases and average AK clearance rate was similar for D-PDT and IM (p=0.74). In D-PDT areas mean grade II AK clearance rate was lower compared with that of grade I AK (p=0.015). In IM areas grade I and II AK average clearance rates were similar (p=0.28). At week 1 and month 1, mean local skin responses (LSR) score were higher in areas treated with IM. IM areas showed more severe pain and cosmetic sequelae. D-PDT had similar effectiveness to IM, even if IM demonstrated higher grade II AK clearance rate. Tolerability profile was superior for D-PDT in terms of LSR and pain. D-PDT was more cosmetically acceptable. Patients preferred D-PDT to IM in most cases.

Safety and tolerability of ingenol mebutate in the treatment of actinic keratosis

INTRODUCTION

Ingenol mebutate is a topical therapeutic agent for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). It has a novel mode of action and has shown comparable efficacy to other topical field therapies. This article summarizes and provides perspective on the safety profile of ingenol mebutate from clinical studies of this agent.

AREAS COVERED

The unique mechanism of action of ingenol mebutate, the basis for a rapid clinical effect, is outlined. Safety and tolerability data, including mean composite local skin response (LSR) scores, type of LSR, and adverse events from a range of clinical studies both in healthy volunteers and patients with AK, are reviewed. The safety profile of ingenol mebutate is then compared with other agents used to treat AK lesions.

EXPERT OPINION

Ingenol mebutate has a dosing period of 2 - 3 days, which is short compared with other field therapies, and there is no evidence of systemic absorption. The fact that most of the LSRs observed are mild to moderate in intensity and transient, with a majority resolved within 2 weeks, makes for a favorable safety profile. Ingenol mebutate enhances the armamentarium available to the dermatologist for the treatment of AK.

How to treat actinic keratosis? An update

Actinic keratosis (AKs) is one of the most common skin lesions leading to an increased risk of developing squamous cell carcinoma and other skin malignancies. The lesions principally arise as a result of excessive ultraviolet (UV) exposure. AKs may regress spontaneously, remain stable or evolve to invasive squamous cell carcinoma. The risk of squamous cell carcinoma is significantly increased patients with more than 5 AKs. The main mechanisms involved in the formation of AK are inflammation, mutagenesis, oxidative stress, impaired apoptosis, immunosuppression, disregulation of cell growth and proliferation, and tissue remodeling. Human papilloma virus has also been correlated with the formation of some AKs. As an individual ages, his skin is exposed to increasing cumulative amounts of UV light and other environmental insults. This is especially true for the head, neck and forearms. These insults do not target only the skin where individual lesions develop, but also the surrounding area. In this area undetectable preclinical AK lesions or dysplastic cells may be present. The whole affected area is known as the 'field'. Therefore, management is divided into lesion-directed and field-directed therapies. Currently, the therapies in use are lesion-directed cryotherapy and/or excision, and field-directed topical agents: 5-fluorouracil, diclofenac, photodynamic therapy, imiquimod, and ingenol mebutate. Combining lesion- and field-directed therapies showed good results and several novel therapies are under investigation. Treatment is variable and personalized, what makes a gold standard management algorithm difficult to design. This review aims to describe the rationale behind the available treatment options for AKs based on current understanding of pathophysiology and epidemiology.

Ingenol mebutate gel for actinic keratosis: the link between quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratosis therapy can elicit unsightly and painful local skin responses; assessment of treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life (QoL) is important. Ingenol mebutate gel is a novel topical field therapy for actinic keratosis.

OBJECTIVE

Post-hoc analyses were performed based on patient-reported outcomes from phase-III trials (n = 1005) to assess the effects of ingenol mebutate on QoL and the relationship between both QoL and treatment satisfaction, and degree of lesion clearance.

METHODS

Patients received ingenol mebutate or vehicle for self-application to a 25-cm(2) contiguous area: 0.015% once daily for 3 consecutive days (face/scalp) or 0.05% once daily for 2 consecutive days (trunk/extremities). QoL (Skindex-16) and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication data were recorded.

RESULTS

Significant, positive associations between Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication score and degree of clearance were identified for patients in the face/scalp (effectiveness P < .0001 and global satisfaction P = .0002) and trunk/extremities (P < .0001 and P = .0014, respectively) groups. There was a significant association between Skindex-16 score and clearance for patients in the face/scalp group for change in symptoms (P = .0218), emotions (P = .0002), and overall Skindex-16 score (P = .0006) from baseline.

LIMITATIONS

Clinical trial population findings may not be generalizable to clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

Ingenol mebutate significantly improved patients' QoL and treatment satisfaction. Improvements were associated with higher degrees of actinic keratosis lesion clearance.

Topical pharmacotherapy for skin cancer: part I. Pharmacology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70:965.e1-12; quiz 977-978. [PMID: 24831324 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.12.045]

Topical pharmacotherapy represents an effective alternative treatment for superficial skin cancer, primarily actinic keratoses and basal cell carcinomas. We provide an in-depth analysis of the pharmacologic aspects of available topical drugs for the treatment of primary skin tumors. In particular, we evaluate the mechanisms of action, formulations and indications, side effects, and contraindications of 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, diclofenac, ingenol mebutate, and retinoids. Moreover, the characteristics of some investigational molecules (ie, resiquimod, piroxicam, dobesilate, and betulinic acid) are presented.

Ingenol mebutate: A novel topical drug for actinic keratosis

The global incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer is rising. Significant morbidity leading to unacceptable cosmetic outcomes and/or functional impairment is a major concern. Search for non-surgical, non-invasive and tissue-sparing treatment modalities has led to development of new therapeutic agents. Actinic keratoses (AK) are one part of a continuous spectrum of benign sun damage to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Although it is not possible to predict which AK might progress to SCC, the presence of AK is a biomarker of risk for patients and must be treated to avoid possible morbidity and mortality. Ingenol mebutate is a novel topical drug from the latex sap of a plant-Euphorbia peplus that acts by chemoablative and immunostimulatory properties. Clinical studies have proven it to be safe and efficacious, leading to FDA approval of this chemotherapeutic agent for field therapy of AK in 2012. Current topical agents for field therapy of AK must be applied for weeks, whereas ingenol needs to be applied for three days. Ingenol offers a new therapeutic option that is convenient, safe, effective, acceptable and well-tolerated.