A retrospective study: Application site pain with the use of crisaborole, a topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor

Ruxolitinib cream monotherapy demonstrates rapid improvement in the extent and signs of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis across head and neck and other anatomic regions in adolescents and adults: pooled results from 2 phase 3 studies

Purpose: Ruxolitinib (selective Janus kinase [JAK] 1 and JAK2 inhibitor) cream demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) in the phase 3 TRuE-AD studies. In TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2 (NCT03745638/NCT03745651), adults and adolescents with mild to moderate AD were randomized to apply twice-daily ruxolitinib cream or vehicle for eight weeks. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of ruxolitinib cream by anatomic region, focusing on head/neck (HN) lesions that are typically difficult to manage and disproportionately affect quality of life (QoL).Materials and methods: Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) responses in anatomic regions were evaluated in the pooled population (N = 1208) and among patients with baseline HN involvement (n = 663). Itch, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), QoL, and application site tolerability were also assessed.Results: By Week 2 (earliest assessment), ruxolitinib cream application resulted in significant improvements across all EASI anatomic region subscores and AD signs versus vehicle, with further improvements through Week 8. Significantly more patients with HN involvement who applied ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle achieved clinically meaningful improvements in itch, IGA, and QoL. Application site reactions with ruxolitinib cream were infrequent (<3%), including in patients with HN involvement.Conclusions: These results support the use of ruxolitinib cream for AD treatment across all anatomic regions, including HN.

Abrocitinib Provides Rapid and Sustained Improvement in Skin Pain and Is Associated with Improved Quality of Life Outcomes in Adult and Adolescent Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Skin pain in atopic dermatitis (AD) increases with disease severity and is associated with substantial quality of life (QoL) burden.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate abrocitinib efficacy on skin pain and QoL in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis included data with abrocitinib administered as monotherapy (pooled phase 2b [NCT02780167] and phase 3 JADE MONO-1 [NCT03349060] and JADE MONO-2 [NCT03575871]) or in combination with topical therapy (phase 3 JADE COMPARE [NCT03720470] and JADE TEEN [NCT03796676]). Patients received oral, once-daily abrocitinib 200 mg, abrocitinib 100 mg, or placebo for 12 or 16 weeks (JADE COMPARE). Skin pain was rated using the Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) skin pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) item ("How painful was your skin over the past 24 h?") on a scale from 0 (not painful) to 10 (extremely painful). Itch (Peak Pruritus NRS) and QoL (Dermatology Life Quality Index or Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index) were assessed. Least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline was analyzed using mixed-effects repeated measures modeling.

RESULTS

A total of 1,822 patients (monotherapy pool, n = 942; JADE COMPARE, n = 595; and JADE TEEN, n = 285) were analyzed. LSM change from baseline in PSAAD skin pain score was significantly greater with abrocitinib versus placebo from week 2 through week 12 or 16 across all 3 study populations and occurred in a dose-dependent manner. A greater proportion of patients achieved a ≥4-point improvement from baseline in PSAAD skin pain score with abrocitinib (200 mg and 100 mg) versus placebo in the monotherapy pool (56% and 38% vs. 12%; week 12), JADE COMPARE (72% and 52% vs. 26%; week 16), and JADE TEEN (51% and 60% vs. 31%; week 12). Additionally, a greater proportion of patients achieved a stringent threshold of skin pain improvement (PSAAD skin pain score <2) with abrocitinib versus placebo. Adults and adolescents who achieved a ≥4-point improvement in skin pain reported greater QoL improvement than those who did not achieve a ≥4-point improvement. A positive correlation (≥0.3) was observed between skin pain and QoL and separately between skin pain and itch across the 3 study populations.

CONCLUSION

Abrocitinib as monotherapy or in combination with topical therapy improved skin pain and was associated with improved QoL in both adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD across all evaluated studies.

Atopic dermatitis: a brief review of recent advances in its management

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disorder characterized by recurrent eczematous lesions and intense itching. The disorder affects people of all ages and ethnicities, has a substantial psychosocial impact on patients and relatives, and is the leading cause of the global burden of skin diseases. Atopic dermatitis is associated with an increased risk of multiple comorbidities, including food allergies, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and mental health disorders. The pathophysiology is complex and involves a strong genetic predisposition, epidermal dysfunction, and T-cell-driven inflammation. Although type-2 mechanisms are dominant, there is increasing evidence that the disorder involves multiple immune pathways. Until recently, the management of AD rested mainly on the judicious use of emollients, topical steroids, and topical calcineurin inhibitors in the majority of patients, and systemic immunosuppressants were advocated in severely diseased patients. However, in the last few years, new therapeutic strategies have been designed and developed to target the various steps in the chain of molecular events that lead to the AD phenotype. This review highlights the recent advancements in the management of AD.

Efficacy of Roflumilast Foam, 0.3%, in Patients With Seborrheic Dermatitis: A Double-blind, Vehicle-Controlled Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Current topical treatment options for seborrheic dermatitis are limited by efficacy and/or safety.

Objective

To assess safety and efficacy of roflumilast foam, 0.3%, in adult patients with seborrheic dermatitis affecting the scalp, face, and/or trunk.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter (24 sites in the US and Canada) phase 2a, parallel group, double-blind, vehicle-controlled clinical trial was conducted between November 12, 2019, and August 21, 2020. Participants were adult (aged ≥18 years) patients with a clinical diagnosis of seborrheic dermatitis for a 3-month or longer duration and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3 or greater (at least moderate), affecting 20% or less body surface area, including scalp, face, trunk, and/or intertriginous areas. Data analysis was performed from September to October 2020.

Interventions

Once-daily roflumilast foam, 0.3% (n = 154), or vehicle foam (n = 72) for 8 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was IGA success, defined as achievement of IGA score of clear or almost clear plus 2-grade improvement from baseline, at week 8. Secondary outcomes included IGA success at weeks 2 and 4; achievement of erythema score of 0 or 1 plus 2-grade improvement from baseline at weeks 2, 4, and 8; achievement of scaling score of 0 or 1 plus 2-grade improvement from baseline at weeks 2, 4, and 8; change in Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) score from baseline; and WI-NRS success, defined as achievement of 4-point or greater WI-NRS score improvement in patients with baseline WI-NRS score of 4 or greater. Safety and tolerability were also assessed.

Results

A total of 226 patients (mean [SD] age, 44.9 [16.8] years; 116 men, 110 women) were randomized to roflumilast foam (n = 154) or vehicle foam (n = 72). At week 8, 104 (73.8%) roflumilast-treated patients achieved IGA success compared with 27 (40.9%) in the vehicle group (P < .001). Roflumilast-treated patients had statistically significantly higher rates of IGA success vs vehicle at week 2, the first time point assessed. Mean (SD) reductions (improvements) on the WI-NRS at week 8 were 59.3% (52.5%) vs 36.6% (42.2%) in the roflumilast and vehicle groups, respectively (P < .001). Roflumilast was well tolerated, with the rate of adverse events similar to that of the vehicle foam.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results from this phase 2a randomized clinical trial of once-daily roflumilast foam, 0.3%, demonstrated favorable efficacy, safety, and local tolerability in the treatment of erythema, scaling, and itch caused by seborrheic dermatitis, supporting further investigation as a nonsteroidal topical treatment.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04091646.

Topical Administration of Crisaborole in Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background. Crisaborole has been considered a promising alternative for topical treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), mainly supported by AD-301 and AD-302. However, critical insights into these two studies have previously been proposed. Objective. To make a comprehensive assessment of the application of crisaborole in mild to moderate AD. Methods. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, in which only randomized controlled trials comparing the application of crisaborole twice daily to vehicle or other active treatment in patients with mild to moderate AD were included. The selection of outcomes was based on the recommendation of the HOME initiative. Patient-reported symptoms, clinician-reported signs, health-related quality of life, and the safety of crisaborole were all assessed using appropriate measurement instruments. Results. Eight RCTs with 2266 patients were included in the pooled analysis. Compared to those treated with vehicle, patients on crisaborole experienced a greater improvement in NRS (MD −0.70; 95% CI −0.94 to −0.47), POEM (MD −3.50; 95% CI −4.34 to −2.66), EASI (MD −14.49%; 95% CI −18.24% to −10.73%), ISGA (RR 1.45; 95% CI 1.28 to 1.63), DLQI (MD −1.54; 95% CI −2.17 to −0.92), and DFI (MD −1.16; 95% CI −1.72 to −0.59) during the 4-week treatment. More patients achieved EASI 75 (RR 1.71; 95% CI 1.43 to 2.04) with crisaborole administration. There was no significant difference between two interventions in the incidence of AEs (RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.29), SAEs (RR 1.89; 95% CI 0.47 to 7.60), or AE-related withdrawal (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.60). One RCT also made comparison between crisaborole and pimecrolimus, suggesting that no significant difference was detected in the improvement of EASI or NRS at most time points. Conclusion. High-quality evidence was provided to demonstrate that the short-term application of crisaborole is safe and efficacious for the treatment of mild to moderate AD. The practical efficacy of crisaborole is similar to that of pimecrolimus.

Modern Interventions for Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis: An Updated Pharmacologic Approach

Pediatric atopic dermatitis (AD) has historically challenged dermatologists given the variable response of patients to treatment and limited available therapeutic options, often with significant potential side effects. Over the last decade, targeted treatments including dupilumab and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as significant treatment advances. An updated therapeutic approach for incorporating these new practice-changing medications can help clinicians manage these challenging patients. In this review, we discuss emerging topical and systemic (oral and injectable) treatments in pediatric AD, including topical PDE4 inhibitors and tapinarof, oral JAK inhibitors, and injected biologics including IL-4Rα inhibitor dupilumab, IL-13 inhibitor tralokinumab, IL-13Rα inhibitor lebrikizumab, IL-31Rα inhibitor nemolizumab, and IL-5Rα inhibitor benralizumab. We also review experimental agents in early clinical trials, such as targeted microbiome transplant lotions/antimicrobials, which may gain relevance in AD treatment. Finally, we propose a therapeutic approach for pediatric AD that incorporates newer therapies including dupilumab and JAK inhibitors, recognizing that these agents may not be universally available or approved. Further trials that include pediatric patients, especially head-to-head studies among therapeutic classes, are needed to clarify the role of emerging treatments.

Pharmacokinetics of Roflumilast Cream in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: Data from Phase I to Phase III Studies

BACKGROUND

Most patients with chronic plaque psoriasis receive topical treatment; however, available options lack a balance of efficacy with long-term safety and tolerability. Roflumilast cream 0.3% is a highly potent phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor approved by the US FDA for treatment of psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to define the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of roflumilast delivered topically from a phase I maximal usage study and data from phase II and phase III studies.

METHODS

PK data for roflumilast and the active metabolite, roflumilast N-oxide, were determined from a phase I PK and safety maximal usage study of roflumilast cream 0.3% applied once daily for 14 days in patients with plaque psoriasis affecting body surface area (BSA) ≥20% (N = 26). Serial plasma samples were obtained on Days 1 and 15 to determine maximum plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). Plasma concentrations were also assessed at Weeks 3, 4, and 5 for terminal half-life (t_½). Concentrations of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide in skin were assessed at Day 28 for 14 patients with psoriasis in a phase I/IIa study of once-daily roflumilast cream 0.5% and 0.15% for 28 days. Systemic exposure (C_trough and AUC) of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide in two phase III trials (DERMIS-1, n = 245; DERMIS-2, n = 250) of roflumilast cream 0.3% for 8 weeks was assessed at Weeks 4 and 8.

RESULTS

Bioavailability of roflumilast cream 0.3% after topical administration was 1.5%. Unlike after oral dosing, the plasma concentration-time curve was flat, with a peak-to-trough ratio of 1.2. Roflumilast N-oxide concentrations were eightfold higher than roflumilast concentrations. The t_½ in adult patients was 4.0 days for roflumilast and 4.6 days for roflumilast N-oxide following the last dose administered. Steady state was reached by Day 15. Concentrations of roflumilast in skin were, on average, 126- and 61.8-fold higher than corresponding mean plasma C_trough following administration of roflumilast cream 0.15% and 0.5% daily for 28 days. Roflumilast N-oxide was quantifiable in only one skin sample (N = 27). Following 8 weeks of treatment in DERMIS-1, mean plasma C_trough of roflumilast was 1.78 ng/mL, and 9.86 ng/mL for roflumilast N-oxide. In DERMIS-2, mean plasma C_trough was 1.72 ng/mL and 10.2 ng/mL, respectively. In the maximal usage study (mean BSA: 27.5%), eight patients (30.8%) experienced adverse events (AEs) and all were mild or moderate, with no reports of diarrhea, headache, insomnia, or application-site pain; no patients discontinued treatment due to an AE.

CONCLUSION

Topical administration of roflumilast cream 0.3% results in concentrations in skin 126- and 61.8-fold higher relative to plasma, which are much higher than expected to be achievable with oral dosing. PDE4 inhibition in the skin is likely due to roflumilast as compared with its active metabolite, as there is no significant conversion to roflumilast N-oxide in the skin. Consistent with reservoir formation and retention of drug in the stratum corneum, roflumilast is slowly released from the skin (t_½ 4 days) and peak-to-trough ratio is 1.2.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIERS

NCT04279119, NCT03392168, NCT04211363, NCT04211389.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of ruxolitinib cream in children and adolescents with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Therapies for children with atopic dermatitis (AD) have safety and tolerability concerns that may limit long-term use. Ruxolitinib cream, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is effective and well tolerated in adolescents and adults with AD.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib cream in pediatric patients. Pharmacokinetics and efficacy were also evaluated in this phase 1 study (NCT03257644).

METHODS

Patients aged 2 to 17 years with AD (affected body surface area 8%-20%; Investigator's Global Assessment score ≥2) were enrolled stepwise in 6 age-descending, strength-increasing cohorts to apply 0.5%, 0.75%, or 1.5% ruxolitinib cream twice daily for 28 days. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy were analyzed at baseline, week 2 (day 10), and week 4 (day 29).

RESULTS

Among 71 patients, 44 (62.0%) had a baseline Investigator's Global Assessment score of 3; median (range) body surface area affected at baseline was 12.2% (1.7%-20.4%). Ruxolitinib cream was well tolerated, with 4 patients (5.6%) experiencing treatment-related adverse events (all grades 1/2). No clinically meaningful changes in mean chemistry or hematology values were observed, and no consistent pattern of change in bone biomarkers was detected. Mean plasma ruxolitinib levels within each cohort (range, 23.1-97.9 nM) were well below the half-maximal inhibitory concentration for thrombopoietin phosphorylation of STAT3 (281 nM). All cohorts experienced improvements in exploratory efficacy end points.

CONCLUSION

Ruxolitinib cream was well tolerated in pediatric patients with AD, with no effect on blood counts or bone biomarkers. Mean plasma concentration was low. Efficacy was consistent with data from previous studies in adolescents and adults.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03257644.

Oxidative Stress and Phototherapy in Atopic Dermatitis: Mechanisms, Role, and Future Perspectives

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease in which the overproduction of reactive oxygen species plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis and persistence of inflammatory lesions. Phototherapy represents one of the most used therapeutic options, with benefits in the clinical picture. Studies have demonstrated the immunomodulatory effect of phototherapy and its role in reducing molecule hallmarks of oxidative stress. In this review, we report the data present in literature dealing with the main signaling molecular pathways involved in oxidative stress after phototherapy to target atopic dermatitis-affected cells. Since oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis and its flare-up, new research lines could be opened to study new drugs that act on this mechanism, perhaps in concert with phototherapy.

New and Upcoming Topical Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis: A Review of the Literature

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis with periods of exacerbation and remissions. AD is characterized by intense, persistent pruritus and heterogeneity in clinical symptomatology and severity. Therapeutic goals include the amelioration of cutaneous eruptions, diminishing relapses and eventually the disease burden. To date, topical corticosteroids (TCS) and calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) have yet been deemed the mainstay of topical treatments in AD management. Nevertheless, despite their indisputable efficiency, TCS and TCI are not indicated for continuous long-term use given their safety profile. While research in AD has concentrated predominantly on systemic therapies, more than 30 novel topical compounds are under development. The existing data appear encouraging, with some regimens that are already FDA-approved (ruxolitinib was the most recent in September 2021) and several pharmaceutical pipeline products for mild-to-moderate AD that are in an advanced stage of development, such as tapinarof, difamilast and roflumilast. Larger, long-term studies are still required to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these novel compounds in the long run and weigh their advantages over present treatments. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the latest knowledge about AD topical treatments, echoing upcoming research trends.

New Topical Therapies in Development for Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic pruritic inflammatory cutaneous disease. AD is characterized by intense pruritus and enormous clinical heterogeneity. Treatment goals are to improve skin lesions and minimize exacerbations and symptom burden. Currently, topical corticosteroids (TCS) and topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) are still considered the main topical therapies in disease treatment. However, despite being very effective, TCS and TCI are not recommended for continuous long-term use, due to potential safety issues. Although research in AD has focused primarily on systemic drugs, more than 20 new topical compounds are under development to treat the disease. This review aims to provide a synthesized summary of the current knowledge about AD topical treatment, echoing existing gaps and coming research trends. The available data seems promising, with some drugs already approved (ruxolitinib being the most recent), and several are in an advanced stage of development and will soon be available for treatment of mild to moderate disease, namely tapinarof, difamilast, and roflumilast. However, longer and larger prospective studies are needed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of these new compounds and evaluate their benefits over current treatments.

Optimizing topical management of atopic dermatitis

OBJECTIVE

Provide a review of atopic dermatitis management, focusing on optimizing topical therapy, creating a stepwise approach for treatment plans, and providing guidance on when to start systemic therapy.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed search of articles in the English language regarding atopic dermatitis in all ages.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles on the subject matter were selected and reviewed.

RESULTS

Topical corticosteroids are the first-line treatment for managing atopic dermatitis. Topical nonsteroidal agents, calcineurin inhibitors, crisaborole, and recently, ruxolitinib, which cause no cutaneous atrophy, are options for reducing the use of topical corticosteroids, including on sensitive sites. Emerging topical agents are in clinical trials. Proactive management, with continued application 2 to 3 times weekly of a midpotency topical corticosteroid or tacrolimus, may maintain control for clear (or almost clear) localized sites of dermatitis that rapidly recur when topical anti-inflammatory medication is stopped. If topical therapy alone cannot control disease and quality of life is impacted, reevaluation to confirm the diagnosis, manage comorbid conditions, address compliance and patient-specific concerns, and optimize topical therapy must be undertaken before deciding to advance to systemic medication. Dupilumab, an interleukin-4 receptor inhibitor, has become first-line systemic therapy given its efficacy and safety, allowing long-term treatment without laboratory monitoring. Other biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors are emerging as alternatives that could eliminate the need for immunosuppressants with their higher risks.

CONCLUSION

Several options are now available for topical treatment. A stepwise approach is needed to consider alternative therapies and diagnoses before advancing to systemic treatment, but the safety of newer immunomodulators will lower the threshold for more aggressive intervention.

JAK inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder associated with heterogenous presentation and often immense patient burden. Safe, targeted treatment options are currently limited. This focused review of the published literature, including clinical trial results, case reports, and abstracts, as well as presentations from scientific meetings and data from industry press releases, describes the use of topical and systemic Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of AD. New topical JAK inhibitors include ruxolitinib (JAK1/2) and delgocitinib (pan-JAK). Ruxolitinib cream met all primary and secondary endpoints in phase 3 clinical trials for mild-to-moderate AD with minimal treatment-emergent adverse events. Delgocitinib ointment was recently approved in Japan for pediatric and adult AD. Oral JAK inhibitors include baricitinib (JAK1/2), abrocitinib (JAK1-selective), and upadacitinib (JAK1-selective). All 3 met primary and secondary endpoints across numerous trials for moderate-to-severe AD. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mainly mild to moderate and included acne, nausea, headache, upper respiratory tract infection, and to a lesser degree, herpes infection and selected laboratory abnormalities. JAK inhibitors hold great promise as the next generation of targeted AD therapy. While their outstanding efficacy is balanced by a favorable safety profile in clinical trials, real-world data are needed to better understand long-term safety, durability, and treatment success.

New treatments in atopic dermatitis

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the efficacy and safety of novel and emerging topical and systemic therapeutic agents for atopic dermatitis (AD).

DATA SOURCES

The review of the published literature was performed using the PubMed database, published abstracts and virtual presentations from scientific meetings, posted results on ClinicalTrials.gov, and data from industry press releases.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Primary manuscripts with trial results, case reports, case series, clinical trial data from ClinicalTrials.gov, and articles highlighting expert perspectives on management of AD were selected.

RESULTS

Emerging topical and systemic therapies primarily target the type 2 immune pathway. Moreover, 2 newer targeted medications are now approved by the Food and Drug Administration for both children and adults, crisaborole 2% ointment and dupilumab, with several others in the therapeutic pipeline. New directions in developing topical medications include Janus kinase inhibitors, tapinarof (an aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist), and agents to correct microbial dysbiosis. In addition to the subcutaneously injected monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin (IL) 4 receptor (dupilumab), other biologics targeting IL-13, IL-31, IL-33, OX40, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin are currently being tested. Oral Janus kinase inhibitors are showing outstanding efficacy and no serious safety signs, but safety concerns remain.

CONCLUSION

Given the tremendous burden of AD on physical, mental, and social health, the need is high to develop new, targeted therapies. Advances in our understanding of AD pathogenesis have paved the way toward the development of new therapies that promise to revolutionize our management of AD. Future research will focus on long-term efficacy and safety and creating predictive models for choosing best management options on a personalized basis.

Pearls in Mitigating Application Pain of Topical Nonsteroidal Agents

BACKGROUND

Topical steroid-sparing agents (SSA), such as tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, and crisaborole, represent an important therapeutic option in the treatment of inflammatory dermatoses such as atopic dermatitis. While these agents lack the common side effects associated with topical corticosteroids, they all share application site pain as an important adverse effect.

SUMMARY

Based on the available evidence and our experience, we suggest the following 7 practical strategies for decreasing the pain associated with SSA use. (1) Use a topical corticosteroid for a few days to reduce inflammation before starting the SSA treatment. (2) Use SSAs strategically. (3) Apply moisturizer before applying SSAs. (4) Store moisturizers in the refrigerator. (5) Ask the patient to apply the SSA on a small test area before broader application. (6) Apply the SSA on dry rather than on damp skin. (7) Consider using aspirin when appropriate for the patient.