1
|
Bangalore Kumar A, Asamoah E, Baum CL. Retrospective Pilot Study: Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Situ of the Head and Neck Treated With Topical 5-Fluorouracil. Dermatol Surg 2025:00042728-990000000-01185. [PMID: 40207780 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000004643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Anagha Bangalore Kumar
- All authors are affiliated with the Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lin CP, Kibbi N, Bandali T, Hirotsu K, Aasi SZ. 5-fluorouracil 5% cream for squamous cell carcinoma in situ: Factors impacting treatment response. J Am Acad Dermatol 2025; 92:473-479. [PMID: 39521136 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.10.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Revised: 09/15/2024] [Accepted: 10/08/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complete clinical response (CCR) rates for squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCis) treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 5% cream range from 27% to 85%. Factors associated with CCR are not well-established. METHODS Retrospective review of biopsy-proven primary SCCis diagnosed between May 1, 2019, and April 30, 2020, and treated with 5-FU 5% cream. Disease status at follow-up was recorded, with treatment failure defined as persistent or recurrent disease. RESULTS The study included 149 SCCis cases, including 33.6% (50/149) arising in the context of immunosuppression. Eighteen cases failed treatment (10 persistent disease, 8 recurrent disease). By tumor size, CCR was noted in 128/144 (88.9%) tumors measuring <2 centimeters in diameter and 3/5 tumors ≥2 centimeters (60.0%, P = .051). By treatment duration, CCR was observed in 4/7 (57.1%) tumors treated for <2 weeks, 72/83 (86.7%) tumors treated for 2 to <4 weeks, and 55/59 (93.2%) tumors treated for ≥4 weeks (P = .019). On multivariate analysis, treatment failure was significantly associated with shorter treatment durations (odds ratio: 0.26; P = .007) and increasing tumor size (odds ratio: 2.40; P = .037). CONCLUSIONS Shorter treatment duration and larger lesion size were significantly associated with failure of 5-FU in SCCis. Immunosuppression and anatomic location were not significant factors, supporting 5-FU use for SCCis in the immunosuppressed population and highlighting its versatility irrespective of anatomic location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine P Lin
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford Medicine, Redwood City, California
| | - Nour Kibbi
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford Medicine, Redwood City, California.
| | - Tarek Bandali
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford Medicine, Redwood City, California
| | - Kelsey Hirotsu
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford Medicine, Redwood City, California
| | - Sumaira Z Aasi
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford Medicine, Redwood City, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Savage KT, Chen J, Schlenker K, Pugliano-Mauro M, Carroll BT. Geriatric dermatologic surgery part I: Frailty assessment and palliative treatments in the geriatric dermatology population. J Am Acad Dermatol 2025; 92:1-16. [PMID: 38580087 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.02.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
Longer life expectancy and increasing keratinocyte carcinoma incidence contribute to an increase in geriatric patients presenting for dermatologic surgery. Unique considerations accompany geriatric patients including goals of care, physiologic changes in medication metabolism, cognitive decline, and frailty. Limited geriatric training in dermatology residency has created a knowledge gap and dermatologic surgeons should be familiar with challenges facing older patients to provide interventions more congruent with goals and avoid overtreatment. Frailty assessments including the Geriatric 8 and Karnofsky Performance Scale are efficient tools to identify patients who are at risk for poor outcomes and complications. When frail patients are identified, goals of care discussions can be aided using structured palliative care frameworks including the 4Ms (what matters, medications, mentation, and mobility), REMAP (reframing, expecting emotion, mapping patient goals, aligning patient goals, and proposing a plan), and Serious Illness Conversation Guide. Most geriatric patients will tolerate standard of care treatments including invasive modalities like Mohs surgery and excision. However, for frail patients, nonstandard treatments including topicals, energy-based devices, and intralesional chemotherapy may be appropriate options to limit patient morbidity while offering reasonable disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin T Savage
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeffrey Chen
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kathryn Schlenker
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center Montlake, Seattle, Washington
| | - Melissa Pugliano-Mauro
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Bryan T Carroll
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Pharmacology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fang S, Zhang L, Wang P, Shi L, Zhang H, Liao C, Zhao Z, Zhou Z, Zhao Y, Yan G, Wu Y, Wu Y, Zheng Z, Wang R, Liu Y, Zhang G, Wang X. Real-world data of 5-aminolaevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy for Bowen disease: a 10-year retrospective study in patients with darker-coloured skin (2011-2021). Clin Exp Dermatol 2024; 49:1190-1196. [PMID: 38641554 DOI: 10.1093/ced/llae139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been strongly recommended as an excellent alternative treatment for Bowen disease (BD). However, reported data on 5-aminolaevulinic acid-mediated PDT (ALA-PDT) with red-light irradiation are limited and the long-term effectiveness remains to be determined, especially in dark-skinned populations. OBJECTIVES We aimed to review routine clinical practice in the field of BD treatment with ALA-PDT over an extended study period (2011-2021), calculate the overall clearance rate, and explore and evaluate factors that might affect the effectiveness of therapy in a real-world setting. METHODS The medical records of patients with BD who received ALA-PDT with red-light irradiation between February 2011 and June 2021 were reviewed and summarized. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinically relevant variables that may affect treatment outcomes were conducted to identify risk predictors. RESULTS The overall clearance rate of 122 BD lesions was 89.3% with a median follow-up time of 36 months. The correlation between the effectiveness and fluorescence intensity of pre-PDT or PDT sessions was statistically significant after eliminating the interference of confounding factors. All recurrences occurred in the first 2 years following ALA-PDT. CONCLUSIONS ALA-PDT is an effective treatment for BD in patients with darker-coloured skin. Well-executed operations and effective pretreatment are the determinants of effectiveness. Fluorescence intensity of pre-PDT appeared to be a significant predictor of final effectiveness. In addition, 2 years of follow-up is necessary following ALA-PDT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan Fang
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Linglin Zhang
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Peiru Wang
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Shi
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Haiyan Zhang
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Caihe Liao
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zijun Zhao
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zongxia Zhou
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Zhao
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guorong Yan
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yun Wu
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuhao Wu
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhe Zheng
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruiping Wang
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yeqiang Liu
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guolong Zhang
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiuli Wang
- Institute of Photomedicine, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Logan S, Porter HJ, Lowry J, Carpenter C, Seward DJ, Holmes T, Goldman G, Bui MR. Oncologic Outcomes for Squamous Cell Carcinoma In Situ With a Clinically Resolved Biopsy Site Managed by Watchful Waiting. Dermatol Surg 2024; 50:710-713. [PMID: 38722701 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000004202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment option decisions for low-risk squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCIS) are hampered by a paucity of management-type-specific outcomes data. OBJECTIVE Describe SCCIS tumor outcomes managed by watchful waiting and risk factors associated with poor cancer outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Single academic hospital in a rural setting. Patients: Adults with SCCIS diagnosed between January 01, 2014, and December 31, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hazard ratios (HRs) for local recurrence (LR), nodal metastases (NM), distant metastases (DM), and disease-specific death (DSD). RESULTS A total of 411 consecutive SCCIS tumors that were considered clinically resolved at follow-up and managed with watchful waiting were included. Seventeen tumors recurred locally. No instances of NM, DM, or DSD were identified. Multivariate analysis found that solid-organ transplant recipient status conferred the highest risk of local recurrence [HR, 9.979 (95% CI, 2.249-39.69)]. Additional risk factors predicting LR include anatomic location on the vermilion lip or ear [HR, 9.744 (95% CI, 1.420-69.28)], anatomic location on the head and neck [HR, 6.687 (95% CI, 1.583-36.15)], and a biopsy with tumor extending to the deep edge [HR, 6.562 (95% CI, 1.367-39.04)]. CONCLUSION Watchful waiting for SCCIS with a clinically resolved biopsy site has a local recurrence rate of 4%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Logan
- College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Hannah J Porter
- Division of Dermatology, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Joy Lowry
- College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Cari Carpenter
- College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - David J Seward
- Department of Pathology, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Todd Holmes
- Division of Dermatology, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Glenn Goldman
- Division of Dermatology, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Melanie R Bui
- Division of Dermatology, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pradhan P, Wan K(Z, Chan L, Low T(H, Wu R, Lee JH, Palme CE, Clark JR, Venchiarutti RL. A qualitative exploration of the pathway to diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with perineural spread. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e70118. [PMID: 39177016 PMCID: PMC11342044 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2024] [Revised: 08/04/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perineural spread (PNS) is associated with a poor prognosis in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (cSCCHN). Hence, investigating facilitators and barriers of early diagnosis and treatment of PNS in cSCCHN may improve outcomes. METHODS Patients were recruited from an institutional database. Semi-structured interviews were conducted according to the Model of Pathways to Treatment. Thematic analysis was based on the four main intervals in the framework using a data-driven analytical method. RESULTS Seventeen participants were interviewed. Facilitators included patients' past experiences, symptom progression, trust in healthcare professionals (HCPs), and capacity to leverage relationships. Barriers included difficult diagnoses, limited access to cancer services, lack of care coordination, and lack of awareness of PNS among primary health care providers. CONCLUSION These findings emphasise the complexity early diagnosis and treatment of PNS. Interventions like clinical practice guidelines, education for HCPs, and telehealth could facilitate timely detection and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poorva Pradhan
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryChris O'Brien LifehouseCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Ke (Zoe) Wan
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Li Chan
- Department of Radiation OncologySt George HospitalKogarahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Tsu‐Hui (Hubert) Low
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryChris O'Brien LifehouseCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck SurgeryFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Raymond Wu
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologyChris O'Brien LifehouseCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jenny H. Lee
- Department of Medical OncologyChris O'Brien LifehouseCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Carsten E. Palme
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryChris O'Brien LifehouseCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jonathan R. Clark
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryChris O'Brien LifehouseCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Royal Prince Alfred Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney Local Health DistrictCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Rebecca L. Venchiarutti
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryChris O'Brien LifehouseCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kandolf L, Peris K, Malvehy J, Mosterd K, Heppt MV, Fargnoli MC, Berking C, Arenberger P, Bylaite-Bučinskiene M, Del Marmol V, Dirschka T, Dreno B, Forsea AM, Harwood CA, Hauschild A, Heerfordt IM, Kauffman R, Kelleners-Smeets N, Lallas A, Lebbe C, Leiter U, Longo C, Mijušković Ž, Pellacani G, Puig S, Saiag P, Šitum M, Stockfleth E, Salavastru C, Stratigos A, Zalaudek I, Garbe C. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of actinic keratoses, epithelial UV-induced dysplasia and field cancerization on behalf of European Association of Dermato-Oncology, European Dermatology Forum, European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology and Union of Medical Specialists (Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2024; 38:1024-1047. [PMID: 38451047 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.19897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
A collaboration of multidisciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology, the European Dermatology Forum, the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, and the European Union of Medical Specialists was formed to develop European recommendations on AK diagnosis and treatment, based on current literature and expert consensus. This guideline addresses the epidemiology, diagnostics, risk stratification and treatments in immunocompetent as well as immunosuppressed patients. Actinic keratoses (AK) are potential precursors of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and display typical histopathologic and immunohistochemical features of this malignancy in an early stage. They can develop into cSSC in situ and become invasive in a low percentage of cases. AK is the most frequent neoplasia in white populations, frequently occurring within a cancerous field induced by ultraviolet radiation. Since it cannot be predicted, which lesion will progress to cSCC and when treatment is usually recommended. The diagnosis of AK and field cancerization is made by clinical examination. Dermatoscopy, confocal microscopy, optical coherence tomography or line-field confocal-OCT can help in the differential diagnosis of AK and other skin neoplasms. A biopsy is indicated in clinically and/or dermatoscopically suspicious and/or treatment-refractory lesions. The choice of treatment depends on patients' and lesion characteristics. For single non-hyperkeratotic lesions, the treatment can be started upon patient's request with destructive treatments or topical treatments. For multiple lesions, field cancerization treatment is advised with topical treatments and photodynamic therapy. Preventive measures such as sun protection, self-examination and repeated field cancerization treatments of previously affected skin areas in high-risk patients are advised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidija Kandolf
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Defence, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Ketty Peris
- UOC di Dermatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Addominali ed Endrocrino Metaboliche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dermatologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Josep Malvehy
- Dermatology Department of Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBER de Enfermedades Raras, Instituto Carlos III, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Klara Mosterd
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maria Concetta Fargnoli
- Dermatology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Petr Arenberger
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital of Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Matilda Bylaite-Bučinskiene
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases and Dermatovenereology, Centre of Dermatovenereology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Veronique Del Marmol
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thomas Dirschka
- Faculty of Health, University Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany
- CentroDerm Clinic, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Brigitte Dreno
- Nantes Université, INSERM, CNRS, Immunology and New Concepts in ImmunoTherapy, INCIT, UMR 1302/EMR6001, Nantes, France
| | - Ana-Maria Forsea
- Department of Oncologic Dermatology, Elias University Hospital Bucharest, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Catherine A Harwood
- Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| | - Ida Marie Heerfordt
- Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Roland Kauffman
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nicole Kelleners-Smeets
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Aimilios Lallas
- First Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Celeste Lebbe
- Université Paris Cite, AP-HP Dermato-oncology, Cancer institute APHP, Nord Paris cité, INSERM U976, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Caterina Longo
- Skin Cancer Center, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Željko Mijušković
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Defence, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Giovanni Pellacani
- Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Susana Puig
- Dermatology Department of Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBER de Enfermedades Raras, Instituto Carlos III, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philippe Saiag
- Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, & EA 4340 "Biomarkers in Cancerology and Hemato-Oncology", UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Mirna Šitum
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Eggert Stockfleth
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Carmen Salavastru
- Department of Pediatric Dermatology, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alexander Stratigos
- 1st Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Iris Zalaudek
- Dermatology Clinic, Maggiore Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Claus Garbe
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Queen D, Trager MH, Fan W, Gordon ER, Samie FH. Assessing outcomes of topical 5-fluorouracil as primary and adjuvant therapy for squamous cell carcinoma in-situ. Arch Dermatol Res 2024; 316:220. [PMID: 38787403 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-024-02906-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in-situ (SCCis) is an intraepithelial tumor with a good prognosis. Standard treatment includes both surgical and non-surgical interventions. We determined the clearance rate for SCCis and residual SCCis identified on frozen section during Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) after treatment with topical fluorouracil 5% cream (5-FU). All MMS cases were initiated for biopsy-proven invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). A retrospective chart review was conducted from January 2017-February 2024 at Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC) to identify patients with SCCis who were treated with topical 5-FU as primary therapy or adjuvant therapy (AT) for residual SCCis post-MMS for invasive SCC. 41 patients were included (80% males, 70.1 ± 11.8 years). The average follow-up time for the primary therapy group was 25.4 ± 12.8 months, and for the post-MMS AT group 22.5 ± 11.1 months. In the group treated with topical 5-FU as primary therapy (n = 28), 27 patients (96.43%, 95% confidence interval: 81.65-99.91%) achieved complete clearance. One patient had recurrence at 8 months post-treatment. Of the patients in the post-MMS adjuvant treatment group (n = 13), 12 (92.3% clearance, 95% confidence interval 63.97-99.81%) achieved complete clearance. One patient had recurrence at 8 months post-treatment. This study found that topical 5-FU cream is effective as both primary therapy for SCCis and as adjuvant therapy for residual SCCis following MMS of invasive SCC.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Fluorouracil/administration & dosage
- Fluorouracil/therapeutic use
- Male
- Female
- Aged
- Retrospective Studies
- Middle Aged
- Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Skin Neoplasms/pathology
- Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods
- Aged, 80 and over
- Treatment Outcome
- Mohs Surgery
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use
- Carcinoma in Situ/drug therapy
- Carcinoma in Situ/pathology
- Administration, Topical
- Follow-Up Studies
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control
- Administration, Cutaneous
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn Queen
- Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Megan H Trager
- Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Weijia Fan
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Herbert Irving Pavilion, 12th Floor, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Emily R Gordon
- Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Faramarz H Samie
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Herbert Irving Pavilion, 12th Floor, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang SK, Cai JW, Zhang Y, Lin YJ, Yang YH. A Frequent Diagnostic Pitfall: Dermatological Clinical Features and Pathological Results in Diagnosing Pagetoid Squamous Cell Carcinoma in situ (Case Series). Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2024; 17:953-959. [PMID: 38699407 PMCID: PMC11063632 DOI: 10.2147/ccid.s454395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in situ can occur on any skin or mucus surface and is more commonly found in elderly patients on areas of skin that have been sunburnt. Most previous case reports are from dermatologists, with few published reports from pathologists. In this study, three patients underwent pathological routine and auxiliary immunohistochemical (IHC) examination and were ultimately diagnosed with pagetoid SCC in situ - a different diagnosis from the initial clinical assessment. All three patients received a complete resection of the skin mass. After follow-up, as of June 2023, the patients had no tumour recurrence or metastasis. Pagetoid SCC in situ is a particular type of SCC in situ that has no specific features in clinical manifestations, gross diagnosis or histopathological sections. The final diagnosis depends on IHC staining. Pagetoid SCC in situ expresses EMA, CK5/6 and p63 but not CEA, CK8 or S-100, which are expressed in extramammary Paget's disease. Pagetoid SCC in situ is usually only locally invasive, and the main treatment is complete surgical resection. The prognosis is related to human papillomavirus infection, surgical margin closure, disease location, tumour thickness and other factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng-Kai Wang
- Department of Pathology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jia-Wei Cai
- Department of Pathology, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, 321000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ya-Jing Lin
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, the First People’s Hospital of Wenling, Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yi-Hui Yang
- Department of Pathology, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, 321000, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kim Y, Khan AH, Papachristou C, Decker A, Lawrence N. Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Situ Achieves Tumor Clearance in More Mohs Stages Than Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Dermatol Surg 2023; 49:1104-1107. [PMID: 38019009 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000004022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCIS) has more subclinical lateral extension than invasive squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). OBJECTIVE To determine whether it takes a greater number of Mohs stages for clearance of SCCIS compared with SCC and whether the difference in final defect size and clinical size is larger in SCCIS than SCC. METHODS All Mohs micrographic surgery cases of SCCIS and SCC performed between January 2011 and December 2021 were identified. Number of Mohs stages were recorded and difference in final defect size and initial clinical size were calculated for SCCIS and SCC. RESULTS 4,363 cases were included, 1,066 SCCIS and 3,297 invasive SCC. The initial clinical size, final defect size, and the size difference were similar between SCCIS and SCC groups. However, SCCIS underwent more Mohs stages to achieve tumor clearance than invasive SCCs (1.5 ± 0.7 vs 1.4 ± 0.7 respectively, p < .001). In fact, 71% of SCCs were cleared after 1 Mohs stage compared with 61.1% of SCCIS. CONCLUSION These findings support that SCCIS has more subclinical lateral extension and therefore is appropriate for Mohs surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yesul Kim
- Division of Dermatologic Surgery, Department of Medicine, Cooper University Health, Camden, NJ
- Division of Dermatologic Surgery, Department of Medicine, Rowan University, Camden, NJ
| | - Amaal H Khan
- Division of Dermatologic Surgery, Department of Medicine, Rowan University Medical School, Camden, NJ
| | | | - Ashley Decker
- Division of Dermatologic Surgery, Department of Medicine, Cooper University Health, Camden, NJ
- Division of Dermatologic Surgery, Department of Medicine, Rowan University, Camden, NJ
| | - Naomi Lawrence
- Division of Dermatologic Surgery, Department of Medicine, Cooper University Health, Camden, NJ
- Division of Dermatologic Surgery, Department of Medicine, Rowan University, Camden, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li F, Jiang JY, Huang SD, Liu MX, Wang XQ, Wong HS, Wang DG. Comparative efficacy of different reconstruction methods after wide local excision of the nail unit: A retrospective study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2023; 37:2583-2588. [PMID: 37591629 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.19423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Wide local excision (WLE) of the nail unit is widely used in treating in situ and minimally invasive malignant subungual tumours. After WLE, diverse reconstruction methods have been reported. However, the best repair method has yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE To compare the repair effects and postoperative morbidity of secondary intention healing (SIH), artificial dermis grafting combined with secondary intention healing (ADGSIH) and full-thickness skin grafting (FSG) after WLE of the nail unit. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 21 patients who underwent WLE of the nail unit. The re-epithelializing time, functional and cosmetic outcomes, postoperative complications and patients' satisfaction were assessed from the follow-up records. RESULTS The FSG group showed more rapid healing and better functional and cosmetic outcomes than the SIH and ADGSIH groups. The ADGSIH and FSG groups showed significant pain relief compared to the SIH group. No serious early and late postoperative complications were reported. The median follow-up period was 26 months, and no recurrence was observed. All patients were satisfied with the treatment. CONCLUSIONS FSG after the WLE of the nail unit is a therapeutic option with convenient application, significant pain relief, rapid recovery and satisfying functional and cosmetic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Li
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jia-Yi Jiang
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Shu-Dai Huang
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Meng-Xi Liu
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiao-Qing Wang
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hoi Shiwn Wong
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Da-Guang Wang
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stratigos AJ, Garbe C, Dessinioti C, Lebbe C, van Akkooi A, Bataille V, Bastholt L, Dreno B, Dummer R, Fargnoli MC, Forsea AM, Harwood CA, Hauschild A, Hoeller C, Kandolf-Sekulovic L, Kaufmann R, Kelleners-Smeets NW, Lallas A, Leiter U, Malvehy J, Del Marmol V, Moreno-Ramirez D, Pellacani G, Peris K, Saiag P, Tagliaferri L, Trakatelli M, Ioannides D, Vieira R, Zalaudek I, Arenberger P, Eggermont AMM, Röcken M, Grob JJ, Lorigan P. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Part 2. Treatment-Update 2023. Eur J Cancer 2023; 193:113252. [PMID: 37708630 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
In order to update recommendations on treatment, supportive care, education, and follow-up of patients with invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), a multidisciplinary panel of experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS), the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), and the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed. Recommendations were based on an evidence-based literature review, guidelines, and expert consensus. Treatment recommendations are presented for common primary cSCC (low risk, high risk), locally advanced cSCC, regional metastatic cSCC (operable or inoperable), and distant metastatic cSCC. For common primary cSCC, the first-line treatment is surgical excision with postoperative margin assessment or micrographically controlled surgery. Achieving clear surgical margins is the most important treatment consideration for patients with cSCCs amenable to surgery. Regarding adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with high-risk localised cSCC with clear surgical margins, current evidence has not shown significant benefit for those with at least one high-risk factor. Radiotherapy should be considered as the primary treatment for non-surgical candidates/tumours. For cSCC with cytologically or histologically confirmed regional nodal metastasis, lymph node dissection is recommended. For patients with metastatic or locally advanced cSCC who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiotherapy, anti-PD-1 agents are the first-line systemic treatment, with cemiplimab being the first approved systemic agent for advanced cSCC by the Food and Drugs Administration/European Medicines Agency. Second-line systemic treatments for advanced cSCC, include epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (cetuximab) combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Multidisciplinary board decisions are mandatory for all patients with advanced cSCC, considering the risks of toxicity, the age and frailty of patients, and co-morbidities, including immunosuppression. Patients should be engaged in informed, shared decision-making on management and be provided with the best supportive care to improve symptom management and quality of life. The frequency of follow-up visits and investigations for subsequent new cSCC depends on underlying risk characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Stratigos
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - Claus Garbe
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Clio Dessinioti
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Celeste Lebbe
- Université Paris Cite, Dermato-Oncology AP-HP Hôpital Saint Louis, Cancer Institute APHP. Nord-Université Paris Cite, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| | - Alexander van Akkooi
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Lars Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Brigitte Dreno
- Nantes Université, INSERM, CNRS, Immunology and New Concepts in ImmunoTherapy, INCIT, UMR 1302/EMR6001, Nantes, France
| | - Reinhard Dummer
- Skin Cancer Centre at University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maria Concetta Fargnoli
- Dermatology Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Ana Maria Forsea
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Department of Oncologic Dermatology, Elias University Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Catherine A Harwood
- Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Hoeller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Roland Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nicole Wj Kelleners-Smeets
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Aimilios Lallas
- First Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Josep Malvehy
- Dermatology Department of Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBER de enfermedades raras, Instituto Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Veronique Del Marmol
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David Moreno-Ramirez
- Department of Medical and Surgical Dermatology Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Ketty Peris
- UOC di Dermatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Addominali ed Endocrino Metaboliche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Dermatologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Philippe Saiag
- Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise-Paré hospital, APHP, and EA 4340 'Biomarkers in Cancerology and Hemato-oncology', UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A, Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Myrto Trakatelli
- Department of Dermatology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University Department of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Ricardo Vieira
- Department of Dermatology, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Iris Zalaudek
- Department of Dermatology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Petr Arenberger
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- University Medical Center Utrecht and Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Technical University Munich and Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Röcken
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Paul Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Veverka KK, Stratman EJ. Electrodesiccation and Curettage for Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Situ: The Effect of Anatomic Location on Local Recurrence. Dermatol Surg 2023; 49:821-824. [PMID: 37279310 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electrodesiccation and curettage (EDC) is a common, minimally invasive treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCIS). OBJECTIVE Determine the 5-year recurrence rate of EDC for SCCIS and to determine if this differs by anatomic location. METHOD AND MATERIALS A retrospective, single-center, cohort study of patients treated between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2017, with at least 5 years of follow-up. The overall 5-year recurrence rate of EDC for SCCIS was calculated and compared across low-risk (L), moderate-risk (M), and high-risk (H) anatomic zones. RESULTS Five hundred ten tumors were randomly identified from 367 unique patients. The 5-year recurrence rate of the entire cohort was 5.3%. There was no significant difference in recurrence by clinical size or immunosuppressed status. One hundred thirty-four tumors in the L zone were matched 1:1:1 to tumors in the M and H zones. The 5-year recurrence rate of M zone tumors (8.2%) and H zone tumors (6.0%) were higher than the recurrence rate of a L zone tumors (3.0%), but this was not statistically significant ( p = .075 and p = .247, respectively). CONCLUSION Electrodesiccation and curettage allows for a high 5-year cure rate across a broad range of anatomic sites. However, overall cure rate should be individualized by anatomic location when counseling patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin K Veverka
- Both authors are affiliated with the Department of Dermatology, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Neuner RA, Lee J, Rieger KE, Park C, Colevas AD, Chang ALS. Immunotherapy for keratinocyte cancers. Part I: Immune-related epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, and immunotherapy management of keratinocyte cancers. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 88:1225-1240. [PMID: 37268390 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.06.1206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
The important role of the immune system in the surveillance and control of keratinocyte cancers (KCs), namely squamous and basal cell carcinomas, is increasingly appreciated, as new immunotherapies have recently become available. As the field of immunotherapy is rapidly evolving, this review synthesizes key concepts and highlights important cellular components within the immune system responsible for attacking KCs. We review the most current data on the epidemiology, risk factors, and immunotherapy management for KCs. Patients will seek advice from dermatologists to help explain why immunotherapies work for KCs and whether they might be appropriate for different clinical scenarios. Collaboration with medical colleagues across different disciplines to evaluate KCs for response to immunotherapy and early recognition of immune-related adverse events will help to optimize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romy A Neuner
- Department of Internal Medicine, Spital Uster, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jinwoo Lee
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, California
| | - Kerri E Rieger
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, California
| | - Caroline Park
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Administration, Palo Alto Healthcare System, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Alexander D Colevas
- Department of Medicine-Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Anne Lynn S Chang
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, California.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Photodynamic inactivation of Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes inoculated onto stainless steel or polyurethane surfaces. Food Microbiol 2023; 110:104174. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2022.104174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
16
|
Croaker A, Davis A, Carroll A, Liu L, Myers SP. Understanding of black salve toxicity by multi-compound cytotoxicity assays. BMC Complement Med Ther 2022; 22:247. [PMID: 36127674 PMCID: PMC9487053 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-022-03721-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Black salve is a controversial complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) associated with skin toxicity and skin cancer treatment failures. Black salve formulations vary between manufacturers and contain a number of botanical and synthetic constituents. The skin cancer cytotoxicity of a number of these constituents has not been assessed to date. The alkaloids from the rhizomes of Sanguinaria canadensis, a key black salve ingredient, have had their single compound cytotoxicity assessed; however, whether they possess synergistic cytotoxicity with other compounds has not been studied and is of direct clinical relevance. This research aimed to improve our understanding of the skin cancer cytotoxicity of black salve constituents.
Methods
The cytotoxicity of individual and combination black salve constituents were assessed against the A375 melanoma and A431 squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Cytotoxicity was determined using the Resazurin assay with fluorescence measured using a Tecan Infinite 200 Pro Microplate reader, compound cytotoxicity being compared to that of the topical cancer therapeutic agent, 5- fluouracil. Docetaxal was used as a positive control. Dunnetts p value was used to determine whether significant synergistic cytotoxicity was present.
Results
Sanguinarine was the most cytotoxic compound tested with a 24-hour IC50 of 2.1 μM against the A375 Melanoma cell line and 3.14 μM against the A431 SCC cell line. All black salve constituents showed greater cytotoxicity against the two skin cancer cell lines tested than the skin cancer therapeutic 5-Fluouracil with 24 hours of compound exposure. Chelerythrine and minor Quaternary Benzophenanthridine Alkaloids (QBAs) present in black salve, at concentrations not having a cytotoxic effect by themselves, boosted the cytotoxic effects of sanguinarine. This could be a synergistic rather than additive cytotoxic effect although the synergistic effect was cell line and concentration dependent.
Conclusions
Black salve contains several cytotoxic compounds, a number of which have been found to possess synergistic cytotoxicity for the first time against skin cancer cell lines. In addition, these compounds together increase the overall cytotoxic effect. Assessing multi-compound cytotoxicity in herbal medicine can provide additional information about both their therapeutic and toxicity potential. As black salve is currently being used by patients, further cytotoxicity work should be undertaken to assess whether synergistic cytotoxicity exists when tested in normal skin cells.
Collapse
|