Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with balloon catheter dilation in children younger than 4 years of age

Balloon dacryoplasty: A boon for dacryologists in managing persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions

PURPOSE

To study the outcomes of balloon dacryoplasty (BD) or (BDCP) in children with persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (pCNLDO) by using new and reused balloon catheters.

METHODS

Our retrospective analysis focused on managing pCNLDO by using the BD or BDCP technique. The study included children aged >1 year to <12 years who underwent single or multiple probings before. Our specific lacrimal workup included a detailed history and examination, as published earlier. We used conventional, straight, 2 mm × 13 mm/3 mm × 15 mm lacrimal balloons (FCI, Ophthacath). We have described a technique to use the same catheter for three BD procedures (1 new + 2 reuse). The outcomes were categorized as complete success, partial success, and failure. The minimum follow-up of each child was 6 months.

RESULTS

We analyzed 64 children (89 eyes) with a mean age of 58 months (15-132 months). All children (100%) had epiphora with discharge and positive FDDT. All children underwent BD under general anesthesia - new balloons in 59 eyes and reused balloons in 30 eyes. The balloons were plasma sterilized akin to vitrectomy cutters and tubings of phaco machines. We noted three leaks from reused balloons (2 from the balloon tip and 1 from the plastic hub). At a mean follow-up of 14.5 months, complete success was noted in 77 eyes (86.5%) (52 new and 25 reuse), while 8 eyes had partial success (8.9%) (4 new and 4 reuse). Failure of BD was noted in four eyes (4.5%) (3 new and 1 reuse). None had significant complications with new or reused balloons.

CONCLUSION

BD or BDCP is a quick, safe, easy, and effective procedure that resolves pCNLDO symptoms satisfactorily. Carefully reusing a conventional balloon catheter is possible with comparable efficacy and no additional complications in pCNLDO.

Factors Associated With Nasolacrimal Duct Probing Failure Among Children in the Intelligent Research in Sight Registry

Importance

Understanding the factors associated with nasolacrimal duct probing failure in young children may help inform practice patterns.

Objective

To identify factors associated with repeated nasolacrimal duct probing in young children.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry for all children who underwent nasolacrimal duct probing before 4 years of age between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to assess the cumulative incidence of a repeated procedure within 2 years of the initial procedure. Hazard ratios (HRs) derived from multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the association between repeated probing and patient age, sex, race and ethnicity, geographic region, operative side, laterality of obstruction, type of initial procedure, and surgeon volume.

Results

This study included 19 357 children (9823 [50.7%] male; mean [SD] age, 1.40 [0.74] years) undergoing nasolacrimal duct probing. The cumulative incidence of repeated nasolacrimal duct probing was 7.2% (95% CI, 6.8%-7.5%) within 2 years of the initial procedure. Among 1333 repeated procedures, the second procedure involved silicone intubation in 669 (50.2%) and balloon catheter dilation in 256 (19.2%). Among 12 008 children aged 1 year or younger, office-based simple probing was associated with a slightly higher probability of reoperation compared with facility-based simple probing (9.5% [95% CI, 8.2%-10.8%] vs 7.1% [95% CI, 6.5%-7.7%]; P < .001). In the multivariable model, a greater risk of repeated probing was associated with bilateral obstruction (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.32-1.65; P < .001) and office-based simple probing (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.55; P < .001), and a lower risk was associated with primary balloon catheter dilation (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.85; P < .001) and procedures performed by high-volume surgeons (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.97; P = .02). Age, sex, race and ethnicity, geographic region, and operative side were not associated with reoperation risk in the multivariable model.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, most children in the IRIS Registry undergoing nasolacrimal duct probing before 4 years of age did not require any additional intervention. Factors associated with lower risk of reoperation include surgeon experience, probing performed under anesthesia, and primary balloon catheter dilation.

Efficacy of Lacrimal Sac Massage in Management of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Infants: An Observational Study of 853 Cases from a Single Institute of Eastern Asia

PURPOSE

Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is the most common cause of epiphora in infants. It usually resolves completely by the end of 1st year with conservative management in most cases. Many studies have confirmed high frequency (80%-90%) of spontaneous resolution of symptoms during the 1st year of life. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the lacrimal sac massage in the treatment of CNLDO.

METHODS

The study was done in a tertiary care hospital in eastern Asia over 5 years. Each infant presenting with epiphora and diagnosed as CNLDO was treated with lacrimal sac massage and reviewed after every 1 month. The resolution of CNLDO was judged by the improvement of epiphora and from the fluorescein dye disappearance test.

RESULTS

Following conservative management, 740 (86.75%) infants recovered completely after 3 months of continuous lacrimal sac massvage. One hundred and five (12.31%) infants did not recover with sac massage even at 12 months, in which cases probing was done. Repeat probing was needed in six patients (0.07%). Two patients did not recover, and a dacrocystorhinostomy was carried out. About 70.6% of infants recovered within 6 months of age. Earlier the age of presentation, the lesser the morbidity.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of CNLDO is about 6%-20% among infants. Several studies showed spontaneous resolution within 1st year of life. In this study, the success rate of resolution of symptoms in CNLDO with sac massage is 86.75%. Conservative management should be the first line of treatment till 12 months of age in CNLDO.

Effectiveness of pediatric Crawford tube implants when endoscopically assisted by ENT surgeons

OBJECTIVE

Epiphora in pediatrics is commonly treated with silicone nasolacrimal stents. The most common treatment duration is 3 months, but tubes are often unintentionally removed earlier and are still effective. There is no consensus on how long tubes need to be in situ and what factors influence treatment success.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent Crawford tube placement over a 10-year period (2009-2019) was conducted. Patients were age >18 years and had Crawford tubes placed in conjunction with an otolaryngologist, who performed nasal endoscopy for direct visualization when retrieving Crawford tubes and infracture of the inferior turbinate. Bicanalicular intubation was attempted in all cases; if not possible, monocanalicular intubation was performed.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were included in this study, representing 50 eyes. Spontaneous extrusion of tubes occurred in 54% of eyes. Tubes remained in situ for an average of 17.1 weeks (0-113 weeks). Symptoms resolved in 86% of patients, similar to procedures without endoscopy. There were no intraoperative complications. There was no association between the rate of persistent symptoms and duration of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Nasolacrimal duct intubation using Crawford tubes performed under direct endoscopic visualization is consistently successful for the treatment of epiphora. Although epiphora can be self-resolving, persistent symptoms typically lasting past the first year of birth, warrant treatment. Children who receive Crawford tubes for epiphora commonly have spontaneous tube extrusion before treatment duration is complete. However, treatment success was not related to the length of time the tubes were in situ. Endoscopic visualization can help prevent intraoperative complications.

A Survey of Pediatric Ophthalmologists to Assess Practice Patterns for Primary Surgical Management of Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

PURPOSE

To survey current practice patterns of pediatric ophthalmologists regarding primary surgical management of infantile dacryostenosis.

METHODS

Responses to a five-question survey were cross-tabulated to compare surgery preferences across patient age ranges and intubation method. Surveys were submitted to members of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus following institutional review board approval.

RESULTS

Results from 142 completed surveys were analyzed. A bimodal distribution of reported propensity to intubate the nasolacrimal duct during primary surgery for dacryostenosis was observed, with one group of ophthalmologists intubating frequently and a second group intubating rarely. For patients younger than 24 months, 33 of 142 surgeons (23%) preferred to intubate 91% or more of the time and 76 of 142 (54%) preferred to intubate 10% or less of the time. For patients older than 24 months, the overall preference for intubation increased compared to the younger patient age group (P < .0007). In older patients, 52 of 142 surgeons (37%) preferred to intubate 91% or more of the time and 45 of 142 surgeons (32%) preferred to intubate 10% or less of the time. The most common preferred intubation methods were self-threading monocanalicular stent (42%) and metal-swaged bicanalicular stent (21%). Surgeons who preferred self-threading monocanalicular stents more often also preferred intubation procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Best practice for infantile dacryostenosis remains a surgeon preference, with some surgeons performing intubation frequently and others performing it rarely. Overall estimated intubation rates for primary surgery increased from 36% in children younger than 24 months to 50% at age 24 months or older. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022;59(1):35-40.].

Comparison of Hasner valvulotomy outcomes in pediatric and adult patients: does age matter?

BACKGROUND

Hasner valve incision has been recently introduced as a new treatment for ophthalmic patients with epiphora symptoms. The aim of this study was to examine whether surgical outcomes of Hasner valve incision for inferior nasolacrimal duct obstruction were different between pediatric and adult patients.

METHODS

A total of 53 eyes of 52 patients who underwent Hasner valve incision in the Beijing Tongren Hospital from October 2016 to November 2019 were retrospectively observed. Patients were divided into two groups, including pediatric group (23 eyes of 22 patients, <18 years old) and adult group (30 eyes of 30 patients, ≥18 years old). Success rate of surgery was determined by both subjective measure (complete resolution of epiphora) and objective measure (lacrimal passage irrigation and tear meniscus height). Fisher exact test was conducted.

RESULTS

By conducting Fisher exact test and comparing complete resolution of epiphora (P = 0.627), lacrimal passage irrigation (P = 0.663), measurement of Tear Meniscus Height (P = 0.561), and appearance of complication (P = 0.339), there was no statistically significant difference of surgical outcomes between pediatric and adult patients (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Hasner valve incision was effective for both adult and children with inferior nasolacrimal duct obstruction, with no difference in surgical outcomes between the two groups.

Balloon catheter dilation as the primary treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to report the outcome of balloon catheter dilation as the primary treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children of all ages.

METHODS

A 10-year retrospective study of 148 children (270 eyes), aged 9 to 159 months (mean age: 29.6 ± 17.7 months), who previously had not undergone a nasolacrimal surgical procedure and who presented with clinical signs of nasolacrimal duct obstruction, was conducted. All children underwent balloon catheter dilation of the nasolacrimal duct.

RESULTS

Treatment success, defined as complete resolution of nasolacrimal duct obstruction symptoms present at follow-up visits at 1 week and up to 6 months after surgery, was 87% (234 of 270 eyes). Partial success was defined as occasional tearing which was acceptable to parents and present in 3% (nine eyes). Only 10% of the children underwent a second procedure due to complete failure. In a sub-analysis by age groups-under 18 months, between 18 and 36 months, and above 36 months-complete resolution rates were 85%, 93%, and 77%, and partial success rates were 3%, 3%, and 4%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the age groups (p = .007).

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction, balloon catheter dilation was successful as a primary treatment for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction, particularly under the age of 36 months.

Surgical management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction; one procedure for all versus all procedures for one

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

After failed conservative management, most clinicians treat congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) in a conventional stepwise fashion: starting with probing, then repeat probing, next silicone intubation and/or balloon dilatation, and finally dacryocystorhinostomy. This approach is based on the patient's age and previously failed procedures and recruits 'one procedure for all' CNLDO. A newly introduced approach is based on the type of obstruction and recruits 'all procedures for one' CNLDO. The aim of this review is to examine the best available evidence regarding CNLDO management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent articles support the concept that through intraoperative evaluation of obstruction in CNLDO, clinicians may predict probing failure and instantaneously employ more appropriate treatment modalities. This review addresses whether an age-based approach should be changed into a one-stage obstruction-based approach.

SUMMARY

An age-based approach treats CNLDO as a homogeneous disease and thus treats all patients with one predetermined procedure. A one-stage obstruction-based approach, however, considers CNLDO to be a heterogeneous disease, and therefore allows recruitment of all procedures simultaneously and selects the best intraoperatively. It may allow replacement of the conventional stepwise approach to CNLDO treatment provided that randomized trials verify its efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness.Video abstract http://links.lww.com/COOP/A30.

Bicanalicular versus monocanalicular intubation after failed probing in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

AIM

To investigate the clinical outcomes of different intubation techniques in the cases of failed primary probing.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed on 338 patients with the diagnosis of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with age 1-4y that had failed primary probing. Intubation was performed under light sedation in operating room and the stent was left 3mo in place. Clinical outcome was investigated 3mo after tube removal.

RESULTS

Bicanalicular intubation method had higher complete and relative success rates compared to monocanalicular intubation (P=0.00). In addition, Monoka intubation had better outcomes compared to Masterka technique (P=0.046). No difference was found between genders but the higher the age, the better the outcomes with bicanalicular technique rather than monocanalicular.

CONCLUSION

Overall success rate of bicanalicular intubation is superior to monocanalicular technique especially in older ages. Also, based upon our clinical outcomes, Masterka intubation is not recommended in cases of failed probing.

A Multi-tool to Reduce Nasolacrimal Stent Complications With the Home-Removable Farson Crawford Tube

PURPOSE

Tear duct obstruction can be treated with probing and stenting, providing a reduced reoperation rate. A new instrument combining punctual dilation with the graduated diameter probe and bony-rasp was developed to assist the procedure.

METHODS

Laterality, type of nasolacrimal disorder, type of procedure, patient age, and postoperative outcome were monitored for one surgeon for two decades.

RESULTS

From 617 cases of pediatric tear duct obstruction, 494 used the bilateral, monocanalicular Farson method, yielding a 1.7% reoperation rate and 0.6% wire-strip rate. The nasolacrimal duct dilator rasp multi-tool, used since 1996, had a similarly low rate of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The Farson technique with the multi-tool provides an affordable, effective procedure for childhood nasolacrimal obstruction, allowing home removal of the stent.

Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: common management policies among pediatric ophthalmologists

PURPOSE

To study common management policies of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNDLO) among pediatric ophthalmologists.

METHODS

A 21-question survey was sent to members of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus in April 2014. The questions focused on treatment of CNLDO during the first year of life, primary and secondary surgical interventions, surgical techniques, and amblyopia assessment.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-seven members completed the survey and 121 responses were analyzed after replies of 6 candidates in training were excluded. Eighty-two percent of respondents instructed caregivers to massage the nasolacrimal duct during the first year of life; however, 55% did not perform the Crigler massage in the office. Outpatient probing was done by 17% of pediatric ophthalmologists who took the survey, almost all of whom (95%) have been in practice more than 10 years. Ninety-one percent recommended surgery for CNLDO close to the age of 1 year and 79% performed probing as initial treatment at that age. If treatment is delayed to the age of 2 years, 53% favored silicone tube intubation and/or balloon dacryoplasty. Following failed probing, silicone tube intubation was performed by 51% of practitioners. Ninety-one percent of respondents routinely checked refraction of infants with CNLDO and recommended reexamination even if initial assessment was entirely normal.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the striking lack of consensus among pediatric ophthalmologists in many aspects of management of CNLDO and allows practitioners to compare their practice patterns regarding CNLDO management with those of their peers; however, because it provides only the opinions of a limited group of pediatric ophthalmologists, it does not imply that less common practices are wrong.

Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in premature children

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) in premature and full-term children.

METHODS

Medical records of 200 premature and 200 full-term children from July 2004 to November 2009 at the Peri-Peri Health Center were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-three nasolacrimal ducts in 32 premature children (21 patients were bilateral) and 9 nasolacrimal ducts in 7 full-term children (2 patients were bilateral) diagnosed as having CNLDO were retrospectively examined.

RESULTS

Of the 200 premature children, 32 (16%) had CNLDO compared with 7 (3.5%) of the 200 full-term infants (P < .0001). Thirty premature infants and five full-term children underwent conservative treatment. Bilateral obstruction was found in all 3 extremely premature children (gestational age < 28 weeks), in 9 (69.23%) moderately premature children (gestational age of 28 to 31 weeks), in 9 (56.25%) mildly premature children (gestational age of 32 to 36 weeks), and in 2 (28.57%) full-term children (gestational age > 37 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reported a higher incidence of CNLDO in preterm infants when compared to full-term infants. This might be expected in light of the normal development of the nasolacrimal duct system, the patency of which normally occurs after the preterm infant is born.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in paediatric ophthalmology: a systematic review

AIM

To identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) specifically developed and used to assess the impact of ophthalmic disorders in children and to systematically assess their quality as a basis for recommendations about their use in clinical and research settings.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and AMED, supplemented by a grey literature search. Papers reporting development and validation of questionnaire instruments for assessing patient-reported outcomes of an ophthalmic disorder in patients aged 2-18 years were included. Quality was assessed by examining the purpose and psychometric properties of the instruments. Strengths and limitations were summarised with recommendations regarding use.

RESULTS

Search identified 17 instruments. Of these, 11 were condition-specific and six were intended for a broader population of children and young people with visual impairment regardless of the ophthalmic condition. Three were developed for use in a specific trial and two are still in development.

CONCLUSIONS

Paediatric ophthalmology PROM development and application is a developing field and new instruments are needed. There is scope for improvement in this area through (a) clarity of definitions of the underlying constructs intended to be measured at the onset of development of new instruments, (b) application of child-centred approaches and (c) adherence to extant guidance and best practice in questionnaire instrument development.

Intraoperative prognostic factors for probing outcome in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the intraoperative prognostic factors for probing outcome in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).

METHODS

In a prospective interventional study, 69 eyes of 60 children aged 12 to 24 months with CNLDO underwent probing and irrigation. All procedures were performed by a single oculoplastic surgeon. The nature of the obstruction was classified by the surgeon as simple or complex. The fluency of irrigation after probing was defined as easy or difficult. Treatment success was defined as no epiphora or mucus discharge at 3 months after probing.

RESULTS

The mean age at the time of probing was 15.3±3.1 months (range, 12-23 months). Treatment success was achieved in 56 of 69 eyes (81.2%). There was a significant difference in success rate of probing in eyes with simple obstruction (87.8%) compared with complex obstruction (65%) (p=0.02). Also, there was a significant difference in success rate of probing in eyes with easy irrigation (100%) compared with difficult irrigation (53.6%) (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Probing was more successful in eyes with simple obstruction or easy irrigation in children aged 12 to 24 months. The fluency of irrigation as an objective finding was a reliable intraoperative prognostic factor for probing success.

Efficiency of endoscopic imaging in repetitive probing following unsuccessful probing

PURPOSE

To show the efficiency of repetitive probing performed with intranasal endoscopic imaging in cases who underwent unsuccessful probing and the accompanying nasal pathologies.

METHODS

Eighty-four eyes of the 64 patients in whom primary probing was found to be unsuccessful were included in the study. Cases were divided into 3 groups, depending on the number of unsuccessful attempts (1 [group 1], 2 [group 2], and 3 [group 3] unsuccessful probings). Diagnosis of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction was confirmed by history taking, clinical examination, and fluorescence disappearance test. All cases underwent nasal endoscopic-assisted probing and were followed up on the first week, first month, and third month following the procedure.

RESULTS

There were 50 eyes in group 1, 23 in group 2, and 11 in group 3. The causes of failure that were determined with endoscopy were as follows: functional insufficiency 8.3%, lower nasal concha tension 4.7%, thin membrane in Hasner valve 3.6%, thick membrane and fibrosis in the distal side of the duct 21.4%, probe progressed submucosally on the nasal wall 33.3%, different exit location in the nose 20.2%, nasal mucosa ballooning in the distal side of the duct 4.7%, mucocele 2.4%, and nasal polyposis 1.2%. The success rate in the groups was estimated as 86% in the first group, 69.5% in the second group, and 54.5% in the third group.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing the repetitive probings via nasal endoscopy provided information about the location and the shape of the obstruction and the opportunity to approach, according to the cause of the failure.

Value of microbiology study in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

PURPOSE

Evaluation of the effect of different microorganisms on congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) tightness and whether probing or silastic intubation is likely to fail in a particular microorganism infection.

METHODS

The culture and sensitivity results of lacrimal drainage system (LDS) discharge samples from patients with CNLDO were reviewed. Different microorganisms were correlated with the severity of nasolacrimal duct (NLD) obstruction observed during surgical intervention. The success rates of probing and silastic intubation as a primary procedure for each identifiable microorganism were documented. Statistical analysis was conducted to correlate the type of microorganism with the tightness of CNLDO and treatment failure.

RESULTS

Out of 181 specimens, 22 had no growth (12.1%). LDS with positive culture had 76.6% successful probing (n = 49) and 82.1% successful silastic intubation (n = 78). Gram-positive and Gram-negative species were almost equally detected. The most prevalent organisms were Streptococcus pneumoniae and Hemophilus influenzae (48.1% and 39.2%, respectively). Tight CNLDO was more prevalent in Serratia marcescens (n = 2; 100%) and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 4; 33.3%) infections with a 7.75 Odds ratio [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.67-34.63]. Staphylococcus aureus had 37.5% successful probing; however, success was achieved in all cases with silastic intubation. Serratia marcescens infections had 100% successful silastic intubation.

CONCLUSION

Microbiology study can predict tight CNLDO and helps in choosing the most successful treatment option. CNLDO with Staphylococcus infection and Serratia marcescens were likely to have tight NLD obstruction and silastic intubation had better outcomes.

Evaluation of treatment modalities and prognostic factors in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the success rates of probing and silicone intubation and risk factors for failure of these procedures.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who were diagnosed with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) and underwent probing or intubation as the primary procedure. Demographic data, clinical features, intraoperative, and postoperative data were evaluated. The patients were divided into four subgroups based on age: 12-24 months, 25-36 months, 37-48 months, and >48 months. The procedure was considered successful when all preoperative signs disappeared with normal dye disappearance test and a positive Jones primary dye test. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the risk factors for failure, and P < 0.05 was statistically significant.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 350 subjects (162 males [46%]) who underwent a total of 454 nasolacrimal duct surgeries. The mean chronological age at time of surgery was 32.6 ± 22.1 months (range, 12-132 months). The overall success rate was 84.8%. Probing was performed 188 times, with a success rate of 80.3%; intubation was performed 266 times, with a success rate of 88%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intubation was more successful than probing in patients with bilateral congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction, Down syndrome, history of acute dacryocystitis, lack of preoperative massage, or intraoperative observation of either a "tight" obstruction or obstruction at sites other than at the level of Hasner's valve. Primary nasolacrimal duct intubation should be considered in these higher risk patients.

Management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Our review aims to provide an update of management protocols for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNDO). Although early probing performed before the age of 1 year was traditionally recommended, many reports have since confirmed high frequencies of spontaneous resolution during the first year of life. Accordingly, a 'wait-and-see' approach, combined with conservative therapies, is judged to be the best option in infants aged<1 year. By contrast, persistent obstruction beyond 1 year of age warrants probing as a first-line interventional therapy. However, the optimal timing for probing remains controversial. Although there remains a high possibility of spontaneous resolution after the first year of age, this must be balanced against the decrease in success rates for probing that accompanies advancing age. If conservative management fails, persistent CNDO beyond 1 year of age should be managed either by further observation or by primary probing according to the severity of symptoms. In patients in whom probing fails, advanced treatment such as balloon catheter dilation, silicone tube intubation or dacryocystorhinostomy may be considered.