Improving ophthalmic outcomes in children with unilateral coronal synostosis by treatment with endoscopic strip craniectomy and helmet therapy rather than fronto-orbital advancement

Socioeconomic Influence on Surgical Management and Outcomes in Patients with Craniosynostosis - A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Disparities in insurance and socioeconomic status (SES) may impact surgical management and subsequent postoperative outcomes for patients with craniosynostosis. This systematic review summarizes the evidence on possible differences in surgical care, including procedure type, age at surgery, and differences in surgical outcomes such as complications, length of hospital stay, and child development based on SES.

DESIGN

The databases Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL were searched between May and July 2022. Following PICO criteria, studies included focused on patients diagnosed with craniosynostosis; corrective surgery for craniosynostosis; comparison of insurance, income, or zip code; and surgical management of postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 724 articles. After three stages of screening, 13 studies were included. Assessed outcomes included: type of procedure (6 articles), age at time of surgery (3 articles), post-operative complications (3 articles), referral delay (2 articles), length of stay (2 articles), hospital costs (2 articles), and child development (1 article). Of the studies with significant results, insurance type was the main SES variable of comparison. While some findings were mixed, these studies indicated that patients with public medical insurance were more likely to experience a delay in referral, undergo an open rather than minimally-invasive procedure, and have more complications, longer hospitalization, and higher medical charges.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that SES may be associated with several differences in the management of patients with craniosynostosis. Further investigation into the impact of SES on the management of patients with craniosynostosis is warranted to identify possible interventions that may improve overall care.

Ophthalmic Manifestations of Unilateral Coronal Synostosis

PURPOSE

To summarize the ophthalmic manifestations of unilateral coronal synostosis patients.

METHODS

We performed a literature search in the electronic database of PubMed, CENTRAL, Cochrane, and Ovid Medline guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Statement for studies evaluating ophthalmic manifestations of unilateral coronal synostosis.

RESULTS

Unilateral coronal synostosis, also called unicoronal synostosis, may be mistaken for deformational plagiocephaly, an asymmetric skull flattening common in newborns. Characteristic facial features, however, distinguish the two. Ophthalmic manifestations of unilateral coronal synostosis include a "harlequin deformity", anisometropic astigmatism, strabismus, amblyopia, and significant orbital asymmetry. The astigmatism is greater on the side opposite the fused coronal suture. Optic neuropathy is uncommon unless unilateral coronal synostosis accompanies more complex multi-suture craniosynostosis. In many cases, surgical intervention is recommended; without intervention, skull asymmetry and ophthalmic disorders tend to worsen with time. Unilateral coronal synostosis can be managed by early endoscopic stripping of the fused suture and helmeting through a year of age or by fronto-orbital-advancement at approximately 1 year of age. Several studies have demonstrated that anisometropic astigmatism, amblyopia, and severity of strabismus are significantly lower after earlier intervention with endoscopic strip craniectomy and helmeting compared to treatment by fronto-orbital-advancement. It remains unknown whether the earlier timing or the nature of the procedure is responsible for the improved outcomes. As endoscopic strip craniectomy can only be performed in the first few months of life, early recognition of the facial, orbital, eyelid, and ophthalmic characteristics by consultant ophthalmologists enables expeditious referral and optimized ophthalmic outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Timely identification of craniofacial and ophthalmic manifestations of infants with unilateral coronal synostosis is important. Early recognition and prompt endoscopic treatment appears to optimize ocular outcomes.

Orbital and Eyelid Characteristics, Strabismus, and Intracranial Pressure Control in Apert Children Treated by Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy versus Fronto-Orbital Advancement

Apert syndrome is characterized by eyelid dysmorphology, V-pattern strabismus, extraocular muscle excyclorotation, and elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). We compare eyelid characteristics, severity of V-pattern strabismus, rectus muscle excyclorotation, and ICP control in Apert syndrome patients initially treated by endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) at about 4 months of age versus fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) performed about 1 year of age.

Methods

Twenty-five patients treated at Boston Children's Hospital met inclusion criteria for this retrospective cohort study. Primary outcomes were magnitude of palpebral fissure downslanting at 1, 3, and 5 years of age, severity of V-pattern strabismus, rectus muscle excyclorotation, and interventions to control ICP.

Results

Before craniofacial repair and through 1 year of age, none of the studied parameters differed for FOA versus ESC treated patients. Palpebral fissure downslanting became statistically greater for those treated by FOA by 3 (P < 0.001) and 5 years of age (P = 0.001). Likewise, severity of palpebral fissure downslanting correlated with severity of V-pattern strabismus at 3 (P = 0.004) and 5 (P = 0.002) years of age. Palpebral fissure downslanting and rectus muscle excyclorotation were typically coexistent (P = 0.053). Secondary interventions to control ICP were required in four of 14 patients treated by ESC (primarily FOA) and in two of 11 patients initially treated by FOA (primarily third ventriculostomy) (P = 0.661).

Conclusions

Apert patients initially treated by ESC had less severe palpebral fissure downslanting and V-pattern strabismus, normalizing their appearance. Thirty percent initially treated by ESC required secondary FOA to control ICP.

Initial UK series of endoscopic suturectomy with postoperative helmeting for craniosynostosis: early report of perioperative experience

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic suturectomy with postoperative helmeting (ESCH) has emerged as a successful treatment for craniosynostosis, initially in North America. We report early outcomes from the first cohort of ESCH patients treated in the United Kingdom (UK).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study with electronic chart review.

RESULTS

18 consecutive patients from the first ESCH procedure in UK (May 2017) until January 2020 identified. 12 male and 6 female infantsd, with a mean age of 4.6 months (range 2.5-7.8 months) and weight of 6.8 kg (range 4.8-9.8 kg). Diagnoses were metopic (n = 8), unicoronal (n = 7), sagittal (n = 2) and multi-sutural (n = 1) synostoses. Median incision length was 3 cm (range 2-10 cm). 16/18 received no blood products, with 2 (both metopics) requiring transfusion (1 donor exposure). Mean operative time (including anaesthesia) was 96 min (range 40-127 min). Median length of hospital stay was 1 night. 1 surgical complication (superficial infection). All patients are currently undergoing helmet orthosis therapy. So far, no patients have required revisional or squint surgery.

CONCLUSION

Early experience from the first UK cohort of ESCH suggests that this is a safe and well tolerated technique with low morbidity, transfusion and short hospital stay. Long-term results in terms of shape, cosmetic and developmental outcome are awaited.

3-Dimensional Morphometric Outcomes After Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy for Unicoronal Synostosis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative helmeting (ESCH) for unicoronal synostosis has shown to be a less morbid procedure when compared with fronto-orbital remodeling (FOR). We aim in this pilot study to report objective methods and quantitative morphologic outcomes of endoscopically treated unicoronal synostosis using 3-dimensional surface scans.

METHODS

Our electronic records were reviewed for ophthalmological, neurodevelopmental outcomes, and helmet-related complications. For morphologic outcomes, the following parameters were used: Cranial Index, Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index, Anterior Symmetry Ratio (ASR), and Root Mean Square between the normal and synostotic sides of the head. Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry scans were evaluated at 3 time points preoperative, 6 months post-op, and at the end of the treatment, which was compared with age-matched scans of normal controls and FOR patients. Nonparametric tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

None of the ESCH cases developed strabismus, major neurodevelopmental delay, or helmet complications. All morphologic parameters improved significantly at 6 months post-op except for the Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index. The ASR was the only parameter to change significantly between 6 months post-op and final scans. At end of helmet treatment, ASR and Root Mean Square differed significantly between the ESCH and both FOR and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative helmeting for single unicoronal synostosis had excellent clinical outcomes. Most of the improvement in head morphology occurred in the first 6 months of treatment. Despite the normalization of the overall head shape, there was residual asymmetry in the frontal and temporal regions of the head.

Epidemiology, Genetics, and Pathophysiology of Craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis, the premature fusion of the infant cranial skulls, can be recognized by characteristic head shape differences that worsen with head growth. Craniosynostosis can be syndromic or nonsyndromic and can involve one suture or multiple sutures. Timely cranial vault surgery is recommended to expand and reshape the skull, with a goal of preventing increased intracranial pressure and providing sufficient space for brain growth. Several gene variants and environmental exposures are known to increase the risk of single suture craniosynostosis (SSC), including in utero constraint, exposure to specific toxins and medications, and medical conditions such as thyroid dysregulation and metabolic bone disorders.

Impact of the Craniofacial Surgery Simulation in Anterior Plagiocephaly on Orbits and Oculomotor Muscles: Biomechanical Analysis With a Finite Element Model

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to show the displacements and strain induced by the supraorbital band advancement during a craniofacial surgery for an anterior plagiocephaly on the orbital bones and the orbital content thanks to a numerical surgical simulation using the finite element method.

METHODS

A three-dimensional (3D) finite element model of a child with an anterior plagiocephaly was entirely created from a tomodensitometry of a patient followed by our Craniofacial Pediatric team. Data of the tomodensitometry were computed with Slicer 3D to re-create the orbit geometry. Mesh production, properties of the model, and simulations of the fronto-orbital advancement were conducted on Hyperworks software (Altair Engineering, Inc., Detroit, MI, USA).

RESULTS

The resulting 3D Finite Element Model was used to perform the supraorbital advancement simulation. Displacement and strain patterns were studied for orbital bones, oculomotor muscles, and eyeballs. Relative high strain in the both trochlear area and excycloration of the right orbit are among the most interesting results as torsional strabismus as V-pattern strabismus are often described in children with an anterior plagiocephaly.

CONCLUSIONS

This pediatric Finite-Element Model of both orbits of a child with an anterior plagiocephaly showed the impact of the fronto-orbital advancement on the oculomotor system. This model described the relationship between the craniofacial surgery and the strabismus in the unilateral coronal synostosis. The advantages of this model are the many opportunities for improvement, including postoperative period and additional surgical procedures.

A Cohort Study of Strabismus Rates Following Correction of the Unicoronal Craniosynostosis Deformity: Conventional Bilateral Fronto-Orbital Advancement Versus Fronto-Orbital Distraction Osteogenesis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this prospective study is to compare perioperative morbidity and strabismus rates between traditional fronto-orbital advancement reconstruction (FOAR) and fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis (FODO) in unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS).

METHOD

A consecutive group of 15 patients undergoing FODO for isolated UCS were compared to a contemporaneous group of 15 patients undergoing traditional FOAR for UCS. Patient age, operative time, blood loss, blood replacement, technical details of the surgery, length of stay, complications, and strabismus rates were documented and compared statistically using chi-square and Student t test with a significance value of 0.05.

RESULTS

The 15 patients undergoing FODO were younger (6.3 and 9.8 months, P < 0.05), experienced less operative time for the initial procedure (111 versus 190 minutes, P < 0.01), less blood loss (26% versus 50% of total blood volume, P < 0.01), and less blood replacement (40% versus 60% of total blood volume, P < 0.05). One patient in the FODO group experienced a new-onset strabismus postoperatively compared with 5 in the FOAR group (P < 0.05). There were no complications requiring a return to the operating room in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of isolated UCS is associated with a favorable perioperative morbidity profile and a decreased incidence of postoperative strabismus compared with traditional FOAR. These positive factors are tempered by the need for an additional procedure for removal of the device and lack of long-term outcomes data on the technique.

Orbital Volumetric Analysis in Patients With Unicoronal Craniosynostosis: A Comparison Between Distraction Osteogenesis and Fronto-Orbital Advancement

BACKGROUND

Unicoronal craniosynostosis is associated with orbital restriction and asymmetry. Surgical treatment aims to both correct the aesthetic deformity and prevent the development of ocular dysfunction. We used orbital quadrant and hemispheric volumetric analysis to assess orbital restriction and compare the effectiveness of distraction osteogenesis with anterior rotational cranial flap (DO) and bilateral fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling (FOAR) with respect to the correction of orbital restriction in patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients with a diagnosis of unicoronal craniosynostosis and treated with either DO or FOAR from 2000 to 2019 was performed. Preoperative and postoperative total orbital volumes, as well as quadrant and hemispheric volume ratios, were calculated from 3-dimensional head computed tomography scans. Selected preoperative and postoperative orbital measurements, including the maxillary length of the orbit (MLO; zygomaticofrontal suture to the top of zygomatic arch) and the sphenoid length of the orbit (SLO; the top of sphenoid suture to the top of zygomatic arch), were also obtained.

RESULTS

Data were available for 28 patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis. Mean preoperative total orbital volume was significantly smaller on the synostotic side compared with the nonsynostotic side (10.94 vs 12.20 cm3, P = 0.04). Preoperative MLO and SLO were significantly longer on the synostotic side compared with the nonsynostotic side (MLO: 20.26 vs 17.75 mm, P < 0.001; SLO: 26.91 vs 24.93 mm, P = 0.01). Distraction osteogenesis and FOAR produced significantly different changes in orbital quadrant and/or hemispheric volume ratios on the nonsynostotic side but not on the synostotic side.

CONCLUSIONS

Before correction, patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis have significantly smaller total orbital volumes on the synostotic side compared with the nonsynostotic side and significantly greater MLO and SLO on the synostotic side compared with the nonsynostotic side. There is no significant difference between DO and FOAR with regard to correcting the observed orbital restriction in these patients.

A 24-month cost and outcome analysis comparing traditional fronto-orbital advancment and remodeling with endoscopic strip craniectomy and molding helmet in the management of unicoronal craniosynostosis: A retrospective bi-institutional review

Introduction

Endoscopic strip craniectomy with helmeting (ESCH) has been shown to be a safe and efficacious alternative to fronto-orbital remodeling (FOR) for selected children with craniosynostosis. In addition to clinical factors, there may be economic benefits from the use of ESCH instead of FOR.

Methods

A retrospective review of 23 patients with nonsyndromic unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS) treated with FOR was carried out at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) for Children in London, UK. Secondary data were used for the ESCH cohort from a paper published by Jimenez and Barone (2013). Data were collected on surgical time, transfusion rates, length of hospital stay, adverse event rates, reintervention rates, and overall costs. Costs were categorized and then assigned to the appropriate data sets.

Results

The mean age of patients undergoing FOR (vs. ESCH) was 17.4 mo (vs. 3.1 mo) with a mean surgical time of 234 min (vs. 55 min), mean transfusion volume of 221.6 mL (vs. 80.0 mL), mean transfusion rate of 14/23 (vs. 2/115), and a total immediate overnight stay of 3.13 days (vs. 97% next-day discharge). The FOR group had a higher adverse event rate (5/23 vs. 4/115, p=<0.005) and a higher number requiring extraocular muscle surgery (4/23 vs. 7/109, p=0.16). There was a substantial difference in overall costs between the two groups. Total variance cost for the FOR group was £7436.5 vs. £4951.35, representing a cost difference of £2485.15 over the 24-month study period.

Conclusion

ESCH, in comparison to FOR, appears as a more economical method in the management of USC patients, as well as having clinical benefits including reduced adverse event rate and improved ophthalmic outcomes.

Strabismus in Unicoronal Craniosynostosis: Effect of Orbital Dysmorphology and Fronto-Orbital Advancement and Remodeling

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine what craniometric changes occur to both orbits of unicoronal craniosynostosis patients undergoing fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling, and which of these changes are associated with new onset of postoperative strabismus.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of the preoperative and postoperative orbits of 24 unicoronal craniosynostosis patients and the orbits of 24 control subjects, totaling 144 orbits. Eight parameters were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. One of the parameters was modified orbital index, an indicator of severity of harlequin deformity.

RESULTS

Significant differences in orbital dimensions and angles were present bilaterally in unicoronal craniosynostosis orbits when compared to controls. Fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling increased the ipsilateral unicoronal craniosynostosis orbital volume from 13,184 ± 2003 mm to 16,220 ± 2323 mm (p < 0.001). Ipsilateral horizontal cone angles were increased from 48 ± 5 degrees to 54 ± 7 degrees (p = 0.004). Ipsilateral vertical cone angles were decreased from 73 ± 8 degrees to 66 ± 10 degrees (p = 0.003). Ipsilateral modified orbital index improved from 0.83 ± 0.06 to 0.88 ± 0.06 (p = 0.003). Three of the 19 unicoronal craniosynostosis patients developed transient postoperative strabismus. Logistic regression analysis displayed a strong significant association between new-onset strabismus and a change in modified orbital index with a coefficient of 30.84 ± 14.51 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The orbital dysmorphology in unicoronal craniosynostosis is bilateral in nature, and it is not wholly treated with conventional fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. The severity of ipsilateral orbital dysmorphology is correlated with the incidence of postoperative strabismus following conventional fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling. Future research is needed to develop strategies to mitigate the risk of development of strabismus in this group of patients.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Surgery for Infantile Craniosynostosis: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patient outcomes of minimally invasive endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) for craniosynostosis.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort analysis (2004-2018) of 500 consecutive infants with craniosynostosis treated by ESC with orthotic therapy at a single center. Operative outcomes included transfusions, complications, and reoperations as well as head circumference change based on World Health Organization percentiles. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with blood transfusion. Paired t tests were used for within-patient comparisons and Fisher exact test to compare syndromic and nonsyndromic subgroups.

RESULTS

ESC was associated with low rates of blood transfusion (6.6%), complications (1.4%), and reoperations (3.0%). Risk factors for transfusion included syndromic craniosynostosis (P = .01) and multiple fused sutures (P = .02). Median surgical time was 47 minutes, and hospital length of stay 1 day. Transfusion and reoperation rates were higher among syndromic patients (both P < .001). Head circumference normalized by 12 months of age relative to World Health Organization criteria in infants with sagittal, coronal, and multisuture craniosynostosis (all P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ESC is a safe, effective, and durable correction of infantile craniosynostosis. ESC can achieve head growth normalization with low risks of blood transfusion, complications, or reoperation. Early identification of craniosynostosis in the newborn period and prompt referral by pediatricians allows families the option of ESC vs larger and riskier open reconstruction procedures.

Evaluation and Management of V pattern Strabismus in Craniosynostosis

V pattern strabismus is the most common ocular motor disorder reported in patients with craniosynostosis. Strabismus management may prove challenging, and few studies provide perspective on surgical approach. The purpose of this review is to discuss evaluation and surgical options for treating V pattern strabismus in patients with craniosynostosis. We provide a step-by-step approach to facilitate surgical planning.

Craniosynostosis and oculomotor disorders

Simple, complex or syndromic craniosynostosis may be responsible for ocular and especially oculomotor pathologies. Among simple craniosynostosis, anterior plagiocephaly is the most frequently associated with oculomotor disorders. Oculomotor disorders encountered in craniosynostosis are specific to this pathology. They may be related to orbital deformities or oculomotor muscle malformations. Early craniofacial surgery reduces the onset and severity of these oculomotor disorders which is very important for ophtalmological patient care. Indeed, these oculomotor disorders are difficult to treat for the ophthalmologist with most of the time several surgeries needed, and lead to amblyopia if neglected.

A review of the management of single-suture craniosynostosis, past, present, and future

BACKGROUND

Craniosynostosis is a condition in which 2 or more of the skull bones fuse prematurely. The spectrum of the disorder most commonly involves the closure of a single suture in the skull, but it can also involve syndromic diagnoses in which multiple skull bones and/or bones outside of the cranium are affected. Craniosynostosis can result in cosmetic deformity as well as potential limitations in brain growth and development, and the neurocognitive impact of the condition is just starting to be studied more thoroughly. Our knowledge regarding the genetics of this condition has also evolved substantially. In this review, the authors explore the medical and surgical advancements in understanding and treating this condition over the past century, with a focus on how the diagnosis and treatment have evolved.

METHODS

In this review article, the authors, who are the leaders of a craniofacial team at a major academic pediatric hospital, focus on single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) affecting the 6 major cranial sutures and discuss the evolution of the treatment of SSC from its early history in modern medicine through the current state of the art and future trends. This discussion is based on the authors' broad experience and a comprehensive review of the literature.

SUMMARY

The management of SSC has evolved substantially over the past 100 years. There have been major advances in technology and medical knowledge that have allowed for safer treatment of this condition through the use of newer techniques and technologies in the fields of surgery, anesthesia, and critical care. The use of less invasive surgical techniques along with other innovations has led to improved outcomes in SSC patients. The future of SSC treatment will likely be guided by elucidation of the causes of neurocognitive delay in these children and assessment of how the timing and type of surgery can mitigate adverse outcomes.

Age at Craniosynostosis Surgery and Its Impact on Ophthalmologic Diagnoses: A Single-Center Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

Ocular abnormalities in craniosynostosis are a persistent concern for patients and providers, and some surgeons feel that early surgical intervention for synostosis alleviates the progression of ophthalmologic abnormalities. In contradistinction, the authors hypothesize that operating early will have no bearing on postoperative ophthalmologic outcomes.

METHODS

Single-suture craniosynostosis patients who underwent surgical correction between 1989 and 2015 were reviewed. Patients with multisuture craniosynostosis, syndromic diagnoses, no preoperative ophthalmology evaluation, and less than 2 years of follow-up were excluded. Logistic regression was used to determine odds of preoperative and postoperative ophthalmologic abnormalities by age, while controlling for patient-level covariates.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-two patients met inclusion criteria. The median age at surgery was 10 months (interquartile range, 7 to 12.9 months). Increasing age at the time of surgery was associated with increased odds of preoperative ophthalmologic diagnoses (OR, 1.06; p = 0.037) but not postoperative diagnoses (OR, 1.00; p = 0.91). Increasing age at surgery was also not associated with increased odds of ophthalmologic diagnoses, regardless of timing (OR, 1.04; p = 0.08). Patients with coronal synostosis (OR, 3.94; p = 0.036) had significantly higher odds of preoperative ophthalmologic diagnoses. Patients with metopic (OR, 5.60; p < 0.001) and coronal (OR, 7.13; p < 0.001) synostosis had significantly higher odds of postoperative ophthalmologic diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

After reviewing an expansive cohort, associations of both overall and postoperative ophthalmologic diagnoses with age at surgery were not found. The authors' findings thus run counter to the theory that early surgical intervention lessens the likelihood of postoperative ophthalmologic diagnoses and improves ophthalmologic outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Papilledema in unicoronal synostosis: a rare finding

OBJECTIVE

Unicoronal synostosis results in frontal plagiocephaly and is preferably treated before the patient is 1 year of age to prevent intracranial hypertension (ICH). However, data on the prevalence of ICH in these patients is currently lacking. This study aimed to establish the prevalence of preoperative and postoperative signs of ICH in a large cohort of patients with unicoronal synostosis and to test whether there is a correlation between papilledema and occipitofrontal head circumference (OFC) curve stagnation in unicoronal synostosis.

METHODS

The authors included all patients with unicoronal synostosis treated before 2 years of age at a single center between 2003 and 2013. The presence of ICH was evaluated by routine fundoscopy. The OFC growth curve was analyzed for deflection and in relationship to signs of ICH.

RESULTS

In total, 104 patients were included in this study, 84 (81%) of whom were considered to have nonsyndromic unicoronal synostosis. Preoperatively, none of the patients had papilledema as determined by fundoscopy (mean age at surgery 11 months). Postoperatively, 5% of patients with syndromic synostosis and 3% of those with nonsyndromic synostosis had papilledema, and this was confirmed by optical coherence tomography. Raised intracranial pressure was confirmed in 1 patient with syndromic unicoronal synostosis. Six of 78 patients had OFC stagnation, which was not significantly correlated to papilledema (p = 0.22). One child with syndromic unicoronal synostosis required repeated surgery for ICH (0.96%).

CONCLUSIONS

Papilledema was not found in patients with unicoronal synostosis when they underwent surgery before the age of 1 year and was also very rare during follow-up. There was no relationship between papilledema and OFC stagnation.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes by Procedure Type for Nonsagittal Single-Suture Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive approaches for the treatment of single-suture craniosynostosis are sometimes touted as equivalent to cranial vault reconstruction. While techniques for sagittal synostosis have been reviewed previously, evidence regarding open and less invasive surgical techniques for metopic, coronal, and lambdoid synostosis has yet to be reviewed.

METHODS

Systematic searches were performed using Embase.com and PubMed. Included studies reported short- or long-term outcomes, compared at least 2 standard techniques, discussed single-suture coronal, metopic, or lambdoid craniosynostosis, and enrolled at least 20 study participants. Two authors screened titles and abstracts, and also performed full text review and data extraction. Given heterogeneous outcomes, qualitative synthesis was performed after data extraction.

RESULTS

The search strategy yielded 2348 articles. Of these, 313 were removed as duplicates, and 1935 were excluded during title/abstract review. After full text review of 100 articles, 19 were selected for data extraction. The heterogeneity of outcomes precluded meta-analysis and required qualitative synthesis. While short-term outcomes indicated decreased morbidity of minimally invasive techniques, only 2 articles presented long-term reoperation rates. One study reported higher reoperation rates in the less invasive technique, and the second reported no reoperations in the median follow-up period of 33 months.

CONCLUSION

Studies comparing long-term outcomes between different surgical techniques for single-suture craniosynostosis remain deficient. The development of standardized outcome measures is essential, and prospective, multicenter studies are necessary to assess the long-term efficacy of these procedures.

A systematic review of endoscopic versus open treatment of craniosynostosis. Part 2: the nonsagittal single sutures

OBJECTIVE

Despite increasing adoption of endoscopic techniques for repair of nonsagittal single-suture craniosynostosis, the efficacy and safety of the procedure relative to established open approaches are unknown. In this systematic review the authors aimed to directly compare open surgical and endoscope-assisted techniques for the treatment of metopic, unilateral coronal, and lambdoid craniosynostosis, with an emphasis on quantitative reported outcomes.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant articles were identified from 3 electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL [Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials]) from their inception to August 2017. The quality of methodology and bias risk were assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies.

RESULTS

Of 316 screened records, 7 studies were included in a qualitative synthesis of the evidence, of which none were eligible for meta-analysis. These reported on 111 unique patients with metopic, 65 with unilateral coronal, and 12 with lambdoid craniosynostosis. For all suture types, 100 (53%) children underwent endoscope-assisted craniosynostosis surgery and 32 (47%) patients underwent open repair. These studies all suggest that blood loss, transfusion rate, operating time, and length of hospital stay were superior for endoscopically treated children. Although potentially comparable or better cosmetic outcomes are reported, the paucity of evidence and considerable variability in outcomes preclude meaningful conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited data comparing open and endoscopic treatments for metopic, unilateral coronal, and lambdoid synostosis suggest a benefit for endoscopic techniques with respect to blood loss, transfusion, length of stay, and operating time. This report highlights shortcomings in evidence and gaps in knowledge regarding endoscopic repair of nonsagittal single-suture craniosynostosis, emphasizing the need for further matched-control studies.

Endoscopic surgery for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis: a 16-year single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

In this paper the authors review their 16-year single-institution consecutive patient experience in the endoscopic treatment of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis with an emphasis on careful review of any associated treatment-related complications and methods of complication avoidance, including preoperative planning, intraoperative management, and postoperative care and follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients undergoing endoscopic, minimally invasive surgery for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis at Rady Children's Hospital from 2000 to 2015. All patients were operated on by a single neurosurgeon in collaboration with two plastic and reconstructive surgeons as part of the institution's craniofacial team.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-five patients underwent minimally invasive endoscopic surgery for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis from 2000 to 2015. The median age at surgery was 3.8 months. The median operative and anesthesia times were 55 and 105 minutes, respectively. The median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 25 ml (median percentage EBL 4.2%). There were no identified episodes of air embolism or operative deaths. One patient suffered an intraoperative sagittal sinus injury, 2 patients underwent intraoperative conversion of planned endoscopic to open procedures, 1 patient experienced a dural tear, and 1 patient had an immediate reexploration for a developing subgaleal hematoma. Two hundred twenty-five patients (96%) were admitted directly to the standard surgical ward where the median length of stay was 1 day. Eight patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) postoperatively, 7 of whom had preexisting medical conditions that the team had identified preoperatively as necessitating a planned ICU admission. The 30-day readmission rate was 1.7% (4 patients), only 1 of whom had a diagnosis (surgical site infection) related to their initial admission. Average length of follow-up was 2.8 years (range < 1 year to 13.4 years). Six children (< 3%) had subsequent open procedures for perceived suboptimal aesthetic results, 4 of whom (> 66%) had either coronal or metopic craniosynostosis. No patient in this series either presented with or subsequently developed signs or symptoms of intracranial hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large single-center consecutive patient series in the endoscopic treatment of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, significant complications were avoided, allowing for postoperative care for the vast majority of infants on a standard surgical ward. No deaths, catastrophic postoperative morbidity, or evidence of the development of symptomatic intracranial hypertension was observed.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic versus open treatment of craniosynostosis. Part 1: the sagittal suture

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis the authors aimed to directly compare open surgical and endoscope-assisted techniques for the treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis, focusing on the outcomes of blood loss, transfusion rate, length of stay, operating time, complication rate, cost, and cosmetic outcome.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant articles were identified from 3 electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL [Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials]) from their inception to August 2017. The quality of methodology and bias risk were assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Effect estimates between groups were calculated as standardized mean differences with 95% CIs. Random and fixed effects models were used to estimate the overall effect.

RESULTS

Of 316 screened records, 10 met the inclusion criteria, of which 3 were included in the meta-analysis. These studies reported on 303 patients treated endoscopically and 385 patients treated with open surgery. Endoscopic surgery was associated with lower estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), shorter length of stay (p < 0.001), and shorter operating time (p < 0.001). From the literature review of the 10 studies, transfusion rates for endoscopic procedures were consistently lower, with significant differences in 4 of 6 studies; the cost was lower, with differences ranging from $11,603 to $31,744 in 3 of 3 studies; and the cosmetic outcomes were equivocal (p > 0.05) in 3 of 3 studies. Finally, endoscopic techniques demonstrated complication rates similar to or lower than those of open surgery in 8 of 8 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic procedures are associated with lower estimated blood loss, operating time, and days in hospital. Future long-term prospective registries may establish advantages with respect to complications and cost, with equivalent cosmetic outcomes. Larger studies evaluating patient- or parent-reported satisfaction and optimal timing of intervention as well as heterogeneity in outcomes are indicated.

Minimally invasive approaches to craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis (CS) is defined as the premature fusion of one or more calvarial sutures. This carries several consequences, including abnormal/asymmetric cranial vault development, increased intracranial pressure, compromised neurocognitive development, and craniofacial deformity. Definitive management is surgical with the goal of protecting cerebral development by re-establishing normal cranial vault expansion and correcting cosmetic deformity. In today's practice, CS surgery has advanced radically from simple craniectomies to major cranial vault reconstructive (CVR) procedures. More recently there has been considerable interest in endoscopic assisted surgery (EAS). Theoretical benefits include decreased operative time, morbidity, blood loss, postoperative pain, cost and faster recovery times. In this focused review, we summarize the current body of literature reporting clinical outcomes in EAS and review the data comparing EAS and CVR.

The prevalence of strabismus in unilateral coronal synostosis

BACKGROUND

While there is a clear correlation between unilateral coronal synostosis (UCS) and ocular motility abnormalities, the literature provides little information as to the true epidemiology of strabismus, or the underlying etiology of these paralleled pathologies. The purpose of this study is to investigate the rate of oculomotor abnormalities associated with UCS and its management.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients identified to have single-suture, nonsyndromic UCS treated by fronto-orbital advancement at a tertiary craniofacial referral center from 1977 to 2013 was performed. Inclusion criteria mandated complete medical, surgical, and ophthalmological records. Patients were evaluated for strabismus both preoperatively and postoperatively, and as to whether eye muscle surgery was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 181 patients underwent treatment for UCS at our institution during the study period, of which 79 met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine patients had strabismus prior to any craniofacial surgical intervention. Following fronto-orbital advancement, 23 patients (46 %) developed a new onset strabismus. Fifty-five patients had no change in their preoperative ocular examination, and one patient had resolution of preoperative strabismus. Of the 51 patients who had postoperative strabismus, 30 went on to have eye muscle surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in gender (p=0.477), race (p=0.395), sidedness of suture involvement (p=0.552), or age at intervention (p=0.66) in comparing the group with new postoperative strabismus and those without.

CONCLUSIONS

This study sheds new light on the prevalence of strabismus in UCS, and more importantly, the risk of developing strabismus in the setting of conventional fronto-orbital advancement. This data will allow more accurate preoperative counseling and reinforces the important role of ophthalmologists as members of the multidisciplinary craniofacial team.

Endoscopic craniosynostosis repair

INTRODUCTION

Craniosynostosis is a rare condition that affects approximately one child in every 2,000 live births, and involves pathological fusion of two or more skull bones. Consequences of craniosynostosis include possible limitation of brain growth and cosmetic effects on the appearance of the child. Traditional repairs for these conditions over the past 3-4 decades have involved an open operation with a large skin incision and major manipulations of the skull bones. More recently, minimally invasive endoscopic techniques have been developed to release the skull bones, followed by postoperative treatment with either an external orthosis or internal springs and distractors to achieve the desired correction.

METHODS

In this review minimally invasive endoscopic repair will be reviewed. A general overview of the condition and techniques for correction will be discussed, followed by specific application of these surgeries for different craniosynostosis diagnoses. Attention to the subtleties of each specific condition will be highlighted.

SUMMARY

Over the past two decades clinical experience and a large number of publications have substantiated the benefits of minimally invasive endoscopic techniques for the treatment of craniosynostosis. These techniques have clear benefits for selected patients, and should be part of the standard of care for this condition at craniofacial centers.

Endoscopic pediatric neurosurgery: implications for anesthesia

Endoscopic surgery is increasingly utilized in neurosurgery for all pediatric age groups. Endoscopic intraventricular neurosurgery represents a unique approach to intracranial pathology but may cause a unique set of limitations and potential complications. Important endoscopic neurosurgical techniques and their indications, perioperative anesthesia management, complications, and success rates are reviewed with special emphasis on endoscopic third ventriculostomy and endoscopic-assisted strip craniectomy in early infancy. Despite encouraging short- and long-term results of early pediatric endoscopic neurosurgery, multicenter randomized studies will be needed to further determine safety and the effect on cognitive development and quality of life.