Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Women: New Clues to Causes and Treatment

HFpEF and sex: understanding the role of sex differences

Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome with many etiological factors and complex pathophysiology affecting millions worldwide. Males and females can have distinct clinical presentation and prognosis, and there is an emerging understanding of the factors that highlight the similarities and differences to synthesize and present available data for sex-specific differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). While the majority of data demonstrate more similarities than differences between females and males in terms of heart failure, there are key differences. Data showed that females have a higher risk of developing HFpEF, but a lower risk of mortality and hospitalization. This can be conditioned by different profiles of comorbidities, postmenopausal changes in sex hormone levels, higher levels of inflammation and chronic microvascular dysfunction in females. These factors, combined with different left ventricular dimensions and function, which are more pronounced with age, lead to a higher prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction at rest and exercise. As a result, females have lower exercise capacity and quality of life when compared to males. Females also have different activities of systems responsible for drug transformation, leading to different efficacy of drugs as well as higher risk of adverse drug reactions. These data prove the necessity for creating sex-specific risk stratification scales and treatment plans.

Differences in presentation, diagnosis and management of heart failure in women. A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC

Despite the progress in the care of individuals with heart failure (HF), important sex disparities in knowledge and management remain, covering all the aspects of the syndrome, from aetiology and pathophysiology to treatment. Important distinctions in phenotypic presentation are widely known, but the mechanisms behind these differences are only partially defined. The impact of sex-specific conditions in the predisposition to HF has gained progressive interest in the HF community. Under-recruitment of women in large randomized clinical trials has continued in the more recent studies despite epidemiological data no longer reporting any substantial difference in the lifetime risk and prognosis between sexes. Target dose of medications and criteria for device eligibility are derived from studies with a large predominance of men, whereas specific information in women is lacking. The present scientific statement encompasses the whole scenario of available evidence on sex-disparities in HF and aims to define the most challenging and urgent residual gaps in the evidence for the scientific and clinical HF communities.

Post-Transcriptional and Epigenetic Regulation of Estrogen Signaling

Post-translational and epigenetic regulation are important mechanisms controlling functions of genes and proteins. Although the "classic" estrogen receptors (ERs) have been acknowledged to function in mediating estrogen effects via transcriptional mechanisms, estrogenic agents modulate the turnover of several proteins via post-transcriptional and post-translational pathways including epigenetics. For instance, the metabolic and angiogenic action of G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) in vascular endothelial cells has been recently elucidated. By interacting with GPER, 17β-estradiol and the GPER agonist G1 enhance endothelial stability of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3) and capillary tube formation by increasing ubiquitin-specific peptidase 19 levels, thereby reducing PFKFB3 ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. In addition to ligands, the functional expression and trafficking of ERs can be modulated by post-translational modification, including palmitoylation. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), the most abundant form of endogenous small RNAs in humans, regulate multiple target genes and are at the center of the multi-target regulatory network. This review also discusses the emerging evidence of how miRNAs affect glycolytic metabolism in cancer, as well as their regulation by estrogens. Restoring dysregulated miRNA expression represents a promising strategy to counteract the progression of cancer and other disease conditions. Accordingly, estrogen post-transcriptional regulatory and epigenetic mechanisms represent novel targets for pharmacological and nonpharmacological intervention for the treatment and prevention of hormone-sensitive noncommunicable diseases, including estrogen-sensitive cancers of the reproductive system in women. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The effects of estrogen are mediated by several mechanisms that are not limited to the transcriptional regulation of target genes. Slowing down the turnover of master regulators of metabolism by estrogens allows cells to rapidly adapt to environmental cues. Identification of estrogen-targeted microRNAs may lead to the development of novel RNA therapeutics that disrupt pathological angiogenesis in estrogen-dependent cancers.

The G protein-coupled oestrogen receptor GPER in health and disease: an update

Oestrogens and their receptors contribute broadly to physiology and diseases. In premenopausal women, endogenous oestrogens protect against cardiovascular, metabolic and neurological diseases and are involved in hormone-sensitive cancers such as breast cancer. Oestrogens and oestrogen mimetics mediate their effects via the cytosolic and nuclear receptors oestrogen receptor-α (ERα) and oestrogen receptor-β (ERβ) and membrane subpopulations as well as the 7-transmembrane G protein-coupled oestrogen receptor (GPER). GPER, which dates back more than 450 million years in evolution, mediates both rapid signalling and transcriptional regulation. Oestrogen mimetics (such as phytooestrogens and xenooestrogens including endocrine disruptors) and licensed drugs such as selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and downregulators (SERDs) also modulate oestrogen receptor activity in both health and disease. Following up on our previous Review of 2011, we herein summarize the progress made in the field of GPER research over the past decade. We will review molecular, cellular and pharmacological aspects of GPER signalling and function, its contribution to physiology, health and disease, and the potential of GPER to serve as a therapeutic target and prognostic indicator of numerous diseases. We also discuss the first clinical trial evaluating a GPER-selective drug and the opportunity of repurposing licensed drugs for the targeting of GPER in clinical medicine.

G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor GPER: Molecular Pharmacology and Therapeutic Applications

The actions of estrogens and related estrogenic molecules are complex and multifaceted in both sexes. A wide array of natural, synthetic, and therapeutic molecules target pathways that produce and respond to estrogens. Multiple receptors promulgate these responses, including the classical estrogen receptors of the nuclear hormone receptor family (estrogen receptors α and β), which function largely as ligand-activated transcription factors, and the 7-transmembrane G protein-coupled estrogen receptor, GPER, which activates a diverse array of signaling pathways. The pharmacology and functional roles of GPER in physiology and disease reveal important roles in responses to both natural and synthetic estrogenic compounds in numerous physiological systems. These functions have implications in the treatment of myriad disease states, including cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic disorders. This review focuses on the complex pharmacology of GPER and summarizes major physiological functions of GPER and the therapeutic implications and ongoing applications of GPER-targeted compounds.

Sex differences and related estrogenic effects in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is an essential subtype of heart failure accounting for 40% of the total. However, the related pathological mechanism and drug therapy research have been stagnant for a long time. The direct cause of this dilemma is the heterogeneity of HFpEF. And some researchers believe that there is no common pathway to reach the origin of HFpEF; others argue that there is an unidentified unified pathophysiological process hidden beneath the ice surface. Aside from the debate, a series of clinical studies have shown that hypertension and obesity play a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of HFpEF. These results imply that there may be two parallel pathological processes interweaved in one disease, manifested as multiple coexistent pathological phenomena, like a shadow. Meanwhile, the prevalence of HFpEF in women is higher than in men in any given age group, especially prominent in elderly patients. These pathological processes and epidemiological data reflect gender differences, reminding us to shift our attention to estrogen. This article will review the parallel pathogenesis of HFpEF, and also introduce sex differences and the potential effect of estrogen in this condition below.

Proteogenomics reveals sex-biased aging genes and coordinated splicing in cardiac aging

The risks of heart diseases are significantly modulated by age and sex, but how these factors influence baseline cardiac gene expression remains incompletely understood. Here, we used RNA sequencing and mass spectrometry to compare gene expression in female and male young adult (4 mo) and early aging (20 mo) mouse hearts, identifying thousands of age- and sex-dependent gene expression signatures. Sexually dimorphic cardiac genes are broadly distributed, functioning in mitochondrial metabolism, translation, and other processes. In parallel, we found over 800 genes with differential aging response between male and female, including genes in cAMP and PKA signaling. Analysis of the sex-adjusted aging cardiac transcriptome revealed a widespread remodeling of exon usage patterns that is largely independent from differential gene expression, concomitant with upstream changes in RNA-binding protein and splice factor transcripts. To evaluate the impact of the splicing events on cardiac proteoform composition, we applied an RNA-guided proteomics computational pipeline to analyze the mass spectrometry data and detected hundreds of putative splice variant proteins that have the potential to rewire the cardiac proteome. Taken together, the results here suggest that cardiac aging is associated with 1) widespread sex-biased aging genes and 2) a rewiring of RNA splicing programs, including sex- and age-dependent changes in exon usages and splice patterns that have the potential to influence cardiac protein structure and function. These changes contribute to the emerging evidence for considerable sexual dimorphism in the cardiac aging process that should be considered in the search for disease mechanisms.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Han et al. used proteogenomics to compare male and female mouse hearts at 4 and 20 mo. Sex-biased cardiac genes function in mitochondrial metabolism, translation, autophagy, and other processes. Hundreds of cardiac genes show sex-by-age interactions, that is, sex-biased aging genes. Cardiac aging is accompanied with a remodeling of exon usage in functionally coordinated genes, concomitant with differential expression of RNA-binding proteins and splice factors. These features represent an underinvestigated aspect of cardiac aging that may be relevant to the search for disease mechanisms.

Heart Failure Subtypes and Cardiomyopathies in Women

Heart failure affects over 2.6 million women and 3.4 million men in the United States with known sex differences in epidemiology, management, response to treatment, and outcomes across a wide spectrum of cardiomyopathies that include peripartum cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, stress cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, and sarcoidosis. Some of these sex-specific considerations are driven by the cellular effects of sex hormones on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, endothelial response to injury, vascular aging, and left ventricular remodeling. Other sex differences are perpetuated by implicit bias leading to undertreatment and underrepresentation in clinical trials. The goal of this narrative review is to comprehensively examine the existing literature over the last decade regarding sex differences in various heart failure syndromes from pathophysiological insights to clinical practice.

Predominance of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Postmenopausal Women: Intra- and Extra-Cardiomyocyte Maladaptive Alterations Scaffolded by Estrogen Deficiency

Heart failure (HF) remains a public health concern as it is associated with high morbidity and death rates. In particular, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents the dominant (>50%) form of HF and mostly occurring among postmenopausal women. Hence, the initiation and progression of the left ventricular diastolic dysfunctions (LVDD) (a typically clinical manifestation of HFpEF) in postmenopausal women have been attributed to estrogen deficiency and the loss of its residue cardioprotective effects. In this review, from a pathophysiological and immunological standpoint, we discuss the probable multiple pathomechanisms resulting in HFpEF, which are facilitated by estrogen deficiency. The initial discussions recap estrogen and estrogen receptors (ERs) and β-adrenergic receptors (βARs) signaling under physiological/pathological states to facilitate cardiac function/dysfunction, respectively. By reconciling these prior discussions, attempts were made to explain how the loss of estrogen facilitates the disruptions both ERs and βARs-mediated signaling responsible for; the modulation of intra-cardiomyocyte calcium homeostasis, maintenance of cardiomyocyte cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix, the adaptive regulation of coronary microvascular endothelial functions and myocardial inflammatory responses. By scaffolding the disruption of these crucial intra- and extra-cardiomyocyte physiological functions, estrogen deficiency has been demonstrated to cause LVDD and increase the incidence of HFpEF in postmenopausal women. Finally, updates on the advancements in treatment interventions for the prevention of HFpEF were highlighted.

Sex differences in the time course and mechanisms of vascular and cardiac aging in mice: role of the smooth muscle cell mineralocorticoid receptor

Aging is associated with heart and vascular dysfunction that contributes to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Clinical data support a sexual dimorphism in the time course of aging-associated CVD. However, the mechanisms driving sex differences in cardiovascular aging and whether they can be modeled in mice have not been explored. Mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs) regulate blood pressure, and we previously demonstrated in male mice that MR expression increases in aging mouse vessels and smooth muscle cell-specific MR deletion (SMC-MR-KO) protects from cardiovascular aging. This study characterizes sex differences in murine cardiovascular aging and the associated sex-specific role of SMC-MR. Aortic stiffness, measured by pulse wave velocity, increased from 3 to 12 mo of age in males but not until 18 mo in females. The timing of the rise in aortic stiffening correlated with the timing of increased aortic MR expression, and aortic stiffness did not increase with age in SMC-MR-KO mice of both sexes. Vascular fibrosis increased at 12 mo in males and later at 18 mo in females; however, fibrosis was attenuated by SMC-MR-KO in males only. In resistance vessels, angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R)-mediated vasoconstriction also increased at 12 mo in males and 18 mo in females. ANG II-induced vasoconstriction was decreased in SMC-MR-KO specifically in males in association with decreased AT1R expression. Cardiac systolic function declined in males and females by 18 mo of age, which was prevented by SMC-MR-KO specifically in females. Cardiac perivascular fibrosis increased with age in both sexes accompanied by sex-specific changes in the expression levels of MR-regulated profibrotic genes.NEW & NOTEWORTHY These data demonstrate that the delayed and steeper decline in cardiovascular function observed in aging females can be modeled in aging mice. Moreover, the mechanisms driving vascular and cardiac aging phenotypes are distinct between males and females. Mineralocorticoid receptors in smooth muscle cells play a significant role in cardiovascular aging in both sexes; however, they do so by distinct mechanisms. Overall, these findings suggest that sex-specific therapies may be necessary to retard the aging process and improve cardiovascular disease outcomes in the aging population.

On the search for the right definition of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

The definition of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has evolved from a clinically based "diagnosis of exclusion" to definitions focused on objective evidence of diastolic dysfunction and/or elevated left ventricular filling pressures. Despite advances in our understanding of HFpEF pathophysiology and the development of more sophisticated imaging modalities, the diagnosis of HFpEF remains challenging, especially in the chronic setting, given that symptoms are provoked by exertion and diagnostic evaluation is largely conducted at rest. Invasive hemodynamic study, and in particular - invasive exercise testing, is considered the reference method for HFpEF diagnosis. However, its use is limited as opposed to the high number of patients with suspected HFpEF. Thus, diagnostic criteria for HFpEF should be principally based on non-invasive measurements. As no single non-invasive variable can adequately corroborate or refute the diagnosis, different combinations of clinical, echocardiographic, and/or biochemical parameters have been introduced. Recent years have brought an abundance of HFpEF definitions. Here, we present and compare four of them: 1) the 2016 European Society of Cardiology criteria for HFpEF; 2) the 2016 echocardiographic algorithm for diagnosing diastolic dysfunction; 3) the 2018 evidence-based H2FPEF score; and 4) the most recent, 2019 Heart Failure Association HFA-PEFF algorithm. These definitions vary in their approach to diagnosis, as well as sensitivity and specificity. Further studies to validate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of HFpEF definitions are warranted. Nevertheless, it seems that the best HFpEF definition would originate from a randomized clinical trial showing a favorable effect of an intervention on prognosis in HFpEF.