Association of Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors Versus Alprostadil With Survival in Men With Coronary Artery Disease

Treatment With Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography and Cardiac Catheterization

BACKGROUND

The effects of phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors on the incidence of long-term outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease are not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

We studied the association between PDE5 inhibitor therapy and the incidence of adverse cardiovascular major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing coronary angiography and intervention.

METHODS

We studied 4582 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography and intervention. The incidence of MACE at 1 year, defined as urgent revascularization, myocardial infarction, admission for heart failure or all-cause death, was considered the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 4582 patients, 562 (12.3%) had current prescriptions for PDE5 inhibitors before the procedure and 4020 (87.7%) did not. The incidence of MACE was 171 (30.4%) among patients of the PDE5 inhibitor group versus 1482 (36.9%) in the non-PDE5 inhibitor group (p = 0.003). In a propensity score-matched analysis of 1124 of patients, 171 (30.4%) patients in the PDE5i group and 175 (31.1%) patients in the non-PDE5i group had a MACE (p = 0.84). On multivariable analysis, the treatment with PDE5 inhibitors was not significantly associated with the risk of MACE (odds ratio [OR] = 0.99, 95% CI 0.93-1.06; p = 0.86).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of veterans undergoing coronary angiography/cardiac catheterization, chronic PDE5i therapy was not associated with an increased risk of MACE at 1 year.

Phosphodiesterase 5 and its inhibitors with ischaemic heart disease: a Mendelian randomization analysis and a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Accumulating studies reported that several phosphodiesterases (PDEs) inhibitors might have cardiovascular benefits.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the relationship between genetically-predicted PDEs and ischaemia heart disease via drug target Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, and then examine the effect of inhibitors of identified target on the outcomes by using real-world data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the two-sample MR study, the expression of genes encoding PDEs was used to proxy the level of PDEs and available expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) for each target gene were identified as the genetic instruments. The outcomes included coronary heart disease (CHD) and myocardial infarction (MI). In the real-world study, a retrospective cohort was conducted to compare the incidence of outcomes between PDE5 inhibitors and alprostadil use by linking Swedish nationwide registers. MR analyses identified two types of PDEs, PDE5, and PDE8, genetically-predicted expression in blood of the encoded genes was significantly associated with the risk of CHD [odds ratio (OR)PDE5A = 1.22,95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-1.40; ORPDE8A = 1.26,95% CI = 1.07-1.49] and MI (ORPDE5A = 1.27,95% CI = 1.09-1.48; ORPDE8A = 1.24,95% CI = 1.04-1.48). Notably, the highest expression of PDE5A was observed in artery aorta, which was also positively related to CHD (OR = 1.17,95% CI = 1.05-1.32) and MI (OR = 1.15,95% CI = 1.02-1.30). Real-world study provided supportive evidence that as compared to alprostadil use, PDE5 inhibitors use significantly reduced the incidence of CHD (adjusted HR = 0.70,95% CI = 0.66-0.73) and MI (adjusted HR = 0.79,95% CI = 0.73-0.84).

CONCLUSION

This study provided observational and genetic evidence about the protective role of PDE5 inhibition against ischaemic heart disease, indicating the potential of these drugs to be repurposed for ischemia heart disease prevention and treatment.

Proceedings of PRINCETON IV: PDE5 inhibitors and cardiac health symposium

INTRODUCTION

Prior consensus meetings have addressed the relationship between phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibition and cardiac health. Given significant accumulation of new data in the past decade, a fourth consensus conference on this topic was convened in Pasadena, California, on March 10 and 11, 2023.

OBJECTIVES

Our meeting aimed to update existing knowledge, assess current guidelines, and make recommendations for future research and practice in this area.

METHODS

An expert panel reviewed existing research and clinical practice guidelines.

RESULTS

Key findings and clinical recommendations are the following: First, erectile dysfunction (ED) is a risk marker and enhancer for cardiovascular (CV) disease. For men with ED and intermediate levels of CV risk, coronary artery calcium (CAC) computed tomography should be considered in addition to previous management algorithms. Second, sexual activity is generally safe for men with ED, although stress testing should still be considered for men with reduced exercise tolerance or ischemia. Third, the safety of PDE5 inhibitor use with concomitant medications was reviewed in depth, particularly concomitant use with nitrates or alpha-blockers. With rare exceptions, PDE5 inhibitors can be safely used in men being treated for hypertension, lower urinary tract symptoms and other common male disorders. Fourth, for men unresponsive to oral therapy or with absolute contraindications for PDE5 inhibitor administration, multiple treatment options can be selected. These were reviewed in depth with clinical recommendations. Fifth, evidence from retrospective studies points strongly toward cardioprotective effects of chronic PDE5-inhibitor use in men. Decreased rates of adverse cardiac outcomes in men taking PDE-5 inhibitors has been consistently reported from multiple studies. Sixth, recommendations were made regarding over-the-counter access and potential risks of dietary supplement adulteration. Seventh, although limited data exist in women, PDE5 inhibitors are generally safe and are being tested for use in multiple new indications.

CONCLUSION

Studies support the overall cardiovascular safety of the PDE5 inhibitors. New indications and applications were reviewed in depth.

The Princeton IV Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease

The Princeton Consensus (Expert Panel) Conference is a multispecialty collaborative symposium dedicated to optimizing sexual function and preserving cardiovascular health. The Fourth Princeton Consensus Conference was convened on March 10-11, 2023, at the Huntington Medical Research Institutes in Pasadena, California. Princeton panels I to III addressed the clinical management of men with erectile dysfunction (ED) who also had cardiovascular disease. Thirteen years since Princeton III, Princeton IV builds on previous foundations in several key areas. Mounting evidence supports the need for providers to treat men with ED as being at risk for cardiac events until proven otherwise. Algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of ED are updated with new recommendations for coronary artery calcium scoring for advanced cardiovascular risk stratification. Optimization of oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the treatment of men with ED and cardiovascular disease is thoroughly explored, including recent evidence of potential cardioprotective effects of these drugs.

Long-term effects of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), which are widely used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), have been found to exhibit systemic vascular benefits by improving endothelial function. In this context, we sought to evaluate the effects of PDE5i on long-term cardiovascular outcomes and mortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted up to 30 May 2023. Cohort studies comparing PDE5i treatment at any dose with other ED treatment, placebo or no treatment and minimum follow-up duration of 6 months were considered eligible. The primary endpoints were: (1) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and (2) all-cause mortality. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Sixteen studies were included (1 257 759 subjects-10.5% treated with PDE5i). The majority of patients (99.4%) were men [median age 61.5 years (range 30-72.8)]. The median follow-up duration was 4.3 years (range 6 months-7.5 years). PDE5i use was associated with a significant reduction in the composite of MACE (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69-0.89). Moreover, the analysis of pooled data from 13 studies, demonstrated that the use of PDE5i was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.87).

CONCLUSION

The use of PDE5i primarily in men with or without known coronary artery disease was associated with a lower risk for cardiovascular events and overall mortality. This information underlines that PDE5i could provide clinical benefit beyond ED treatment and could instigate the conduction of further, large-scale randomized clinical trials.

PDE5 inhibition mitigates heart failure in hyperlipidemia

PDE5 inhibitors was reported to play a protective role in both regulating lipid metabolism and reducing heart failure (HF). This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of PDE5 inhibitors against hyperlipidemia-related HF by combining evidence from population-based study and animal models. The nationwide cohort study found that post-diagnostic use of PDE5 inhibitors was associated with a significantly lower risk of HF compared with patients who used alprostadil, especially among individuals with hyperlipidemia (adjusted HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.40-0.78). In animal models, sildenafil significantly recovered the cardiac structure and function induced by AAB surgery, as well as reversed liver dysfunction and ameliorated hyperlipidemia induced by HFD via reducing the level of ALT, AST and serum lipids. Lipidomic analysis identified four lipid metabolites involved in sildenafil administration, including FA 16:3, LPC O-18:1, DG24:0_18:0 and SE28:1/20:4. This study revealed the protective effect of PDE5 inhibitors against HF in hyperlipidemia, indicating the potential of being repurposed as an adjuvant for HF prevention in patients with hyperlipidemia if these findings can be further confirmed in clinical trials.

Addressing the Missing Links in Cardiovascular Aging

The aim of this manuscript is to provide a review of available options to enhance cardiovascular health and prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the aging population using a systems-biology approach. These include the role of the gut microbiome, the early identification and removal of environmental toxins, and finally age related sex hormones and supplement replacement which all influence aging. Implementing such a comprehensive approach has the potential to facilitate earlier risk assessment, disease prevention, and even improve mortality. Further study in these areas will continue to advance our understanding and refine therapeutic interventions for a healthier cardiovascular aging process.

The association of tadalafil exposure with lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in a general population of men with erectile dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Tadalafil is a long-acting phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE-5i) indicated for erectile dysfunction (ED).

HYPOTHESIS

Our hypothesis was that tadalafil will reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, unstable angina, heart failure, stroke) and all-cause death in men with ED.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in a large US commercial insurance claims database in men with a diagnosis of ED without prior MACE within 1 year. The exposed group (n = 8156) had ≥1 claim for tadalafil; the unexposed group (n = 21 012) had no claims for any PDE-5i.

RESULTS

Primary outcome was MACE; secondary outcome was all-cause death. Groups were matched for cardiovascular risk factors, including preventive therapy. Over a mean follow-up of 37 months for the exposed group and 29 months for the unexposed group, adjusted rates of MACE were 19% lower in men exposed to tadalafil versus those unexposed to any PDE-5i (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.70-0.94; p = .007). Tadalafil exposure was associated with lower adjusted rates of coronary revascularization (HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.52-0.90; p = .006); unstable angina (HR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.37-0.81; p = .003); and cardiovascular-related mortality (HR = 0.45; CI = 0.22-0.93; p = .032). Overall mortality rate was 44% lower in men exposed to tadalafil (HR = 0.56; CI = 0.43-0.74; p < .001). Men in the highest quartile of tadalafil exposure had the lowest rates of MACE (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.28-0.58; p < .001) compared to lowest exposure quartile.

CONCLUSION

In men with ED, exposure to tadalafil was associated with significant and clinically meaningful lower rates of MACE and overall mortality.

Princeton IV consensus guidelines: PDE5 inhibitors and cardiac health

BACKGROUND

In 1999, 1 year after the approval of the first oral phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), the first Princeton Consensus Conference was held to address the clinical management of men with ED who also had cardiovascular disease. These issues were readdressed in the second and third conferences. In the 13 years since the last Princeton Consensus Conference, the experience with PDE5 inhibitors is more robust, and recent new data have emerged regarding not only safety and drug-drug interactions, but also a potential cardioprotective effect of these drugs.

AIM

In March 2023, an interdisciplinary group of scientists and practitioners met for the fourth Princeton Consensus Guidelines at the Huntington Medical Research Institutes in Pasadena, California, to readdress the cardiovascular workup of men presenting with ED as well as the approach to treatment of ED in men with known cardiovascular disease.

METHOD

A series of lectures from experts in the field followed by Delphi-type discussions were developed to reach consensus.

OUTCOMES

Consensus was reached regarding a number of issues related to erectile dysfunction and the interaction with cardiovascular health and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.

RESULTS

An algorithm based on recent recommendations of the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association, including the use of computed tomography coronary artery calcium scoring, was integrated into the evaluation of men presenting with ED. Additionally, the issue of nitrate use was further considered in an algorithm regarding the treatment of ED patients with coronary artery disease. Other topics included the psychological effect of ED and the benefits of treating it; the mechanism of action of the PDE5 inhibitors; drug-drug interactions; optimizing use of a PDE5 inhibitors; rare adverse events; potential cardiovascular benefits observed in recent retrospective studies; adulteration of dietary supplements with PDE5 inhibitors; the pros and cons of over-the-counter PDE5 inhibitors; non-PDE5 inhibitor therapy for ED including restorative therapies such as stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, and shock therapy; other non-PDE5 inhibitor therapies, including injection therapy and penile prostheses; the issue of safety and effectiveness of PDE5 inhibitors in women; and recommendations for future studies in the field of sexual dysfunction and PDE5 inhibitor use were discussed.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Algorithms and tables were developed to help guide the clinician in dealing with the interaction of ED and cardiovascular risk and disease.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Strengths include the expertise of the participants and consensus recommendations. Limitations included that participants were from the United States only for this particular meeting.

CONCLUSION

The issue of the intersection between cardiovascular health and sexual health remains an important topic with new studies suggesting the cardiovascular safety of PDE5 inhibitors.

Risk of Death in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Taking Nitrates and Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) treatment for erectile dysfunction is associated with lower mortality compared with no treatment for erectile dysfunction after myocardial infarction (MI). There are conflicting results regarding the impact of PDE5i treatment on mortality in conjunction with nitrate medication.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between PDE5i treatment and cardiovascular outcomes in men with stable coronary artery disease treated with nitrate medication.

METHODS

Using the Swedish Patient Register and the Prescribed Drug Register we included men with previous MI or revascularization in 2006-2013 who had 2 dispensed nitrate prescriptions within 6 months. Exposure was defined as at least 2 filled prescriptions of any PDE5i. We performed multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression to estimate HRs with 95% CIs for all-cause, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality, MI, heart failure, cardiac revascularization, and major cardiovascular events (MACE).

RESULTS

In total, 55,777 men were treated with nitrates and 5,710 men with nitrates and a PDE5i. The combined use of PDE5i treatment with nitrates was associated with higher mortality (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.28-1.51), cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.11-1.62), noncardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.27-1.54), MI (HR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.55-1.90), heart failure (HR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.48-1.90), cardiac revascularization (HR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.78-2.13), and MACE (HR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.58-1.83).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a PDE5i in combination with nitrate medication in men with stable coronary artery disease may pose an increased hazard for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Careful patient-centered consideration before prescribing PDE5is to patients with cardiovascular disease using nitrate medication is warranted.

Causal association of cardiovascular disease with erectile dysfunction: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis

BACKGROUND

The association between cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including ischemic stroke (IS), heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), and coronary heart disease (CHD), and erectile dysfunction (ED) remains unclear from observational studies.

OBJECTIVES

We explored the potential bidirectional association between CVD and ED by Mendelian randomization (MR).

METHODS

Data from genome-wide association studies for CVD in individuals with European ancestry were obtained from several databases, with 1,711,875-977,323 participants, while that for ED included 223,805 participants. We conducted univariate MR (UVMR), inverse variance-weighting (IVW), weighted median, MR-Egger, and multivariate MR (MVMR) analyses to explore the bidirectional causal effects between CVD and ED.

RESULTS

UVMR indicated that IS (odds ratios [OR] = 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.21, P = 0.007), HF (OR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.07-1.74, P = 0.013), and CHD (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.09-1.18, P = 0.022) were associated with ED. By MVMR, IS estimates remained significant after accounting for combining single nucleotide polymorphisms from CVDs (OR = 1.42, 95%CI: 1.13-1.79, P = 0.002). Moreover, the effect of a genetic susceptibility to IS on ED was not mediated by type 2 diabetes or triglycerides; that of HF was not mediated by type 2 diabetes, and that of CHD was not mediated by body mass index. Bidirectional analyses showed that genetic susceptibility to ED did not confer any increased CVD risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results, based on MR, indicated that genetic susceptibility to IS, HF, and CHD was causally associated with ED. These findings can inform prevention and intervention strategies for ED in IS, HF, and CHD patients.

Improvement in Endothelial Function in Men Taking Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors for Erectile Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this research was to explore the mechanistic protective cardiovascular effects of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) in males with erectile dysfunction. Erectile dysfunction and endothelial dysfunction both precede clinical atherosclerosis. Studies have shown that treatment for erectile dysfunction with PDE5-Is decreased death, heart failure, myocardial infarction, and revascularization in males with erectile dysfunction who had previous myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular events.

METHODS

This was a pilot study that recruited 5 men with erectile dysfunction without cardiovascular disease. Endothelial function (flow-mediated percent change of the diameter of the brachial artery), erectile dysfunction grade, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and body mass index were measured before and 3 months after starting treatment with tadalafil, 5 mg daily. Pearson's analysis was performed to study a correlation between the change in erectile dysfunction and the change in endothelial function.

RESULTS

A significant correlation was found between changes in flow-mediated percent change of the diameter of the brachial artery and changes in erectile dysfunction following the administration of tadalafil (P = .010; Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.959). No change was observed in C-reactive protein or weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Erectile dysfunction and endothelial dysfunction are risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Our study showed that PDE5-Is improved endothelial function and erectile dysfunction (with a significant correlation). Improving endothelial function could be the mechanism that leads to a reduction in cardiovascular events and death in men with erectile dysfunction treated with PDE5-Is.

Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor Use in Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Patients Is Associated with Reduced Risk of Death: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of 1,058 Patients

PURPOSE

We investigated whether the use of a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) after robot assited radical prostatectomy has a survival benefit over non-use patients because there are controversial results on the association between PDE5i use and survival outcomes for prostate cancer patients in literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed a retrospective, matched, large-sample cohort study of 5,545 patients who underwent robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) during 2013-2021 in a single institute. The exclusion criteria was patients who were aged >70 years at surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification grade 4 or 5, history of other malignancies, patients who started PDE5i 6 months after survery and patients with follow up period less than 24 months after surgery. Among the 1,843 included patients, 1,298 were PDE5i users, and 545 were PDE5i non-users. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) of PDE5i users (n=529) with non-users (n=529) by adjusting for the variables of age, Gleason grade group, pathological T stage, preoperative ASA physical status grade, and International Index of Erectile Function score.

RESULTS

There were no significant difference in patient characteristics according to PSM. Kaplan-Meier curve revealed the difference of overall survival for PDE5i users and non-users (clustered log-rank test p<0.05). In a stratified Cox regression analysis, PDE5i use after RARP was associated with improved overall survival and reduced risk of death (hazard ratio 0.43; confidence interval 0.24-0.79; p=0.007). The limitation of this study was that the indication for the prescription of PDE5i was not given.

CONCLUSIONS

PDE5i administration after RARP were associated with overall survival of patients with prostate cancer. A further randomized control trial may reveal whether routine use of PDE5i after prostatectomy can improve survival of prostate cancer patient.

Cardiac Effects of Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors: Efficacy and Safety

The coexistence of cardiovascular disease and erectile dysfunction is widespread, possibly owing to underlying endothelial dysfunction in both diseases. Millions of patients with cardiovascular disease are prescribed phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors for the management of erectile dysfunction. Although the role of PDE5 inhibitors in erectile dysfunction therapy is well established, their effects on the cardiovascular system are unclear. Preclinical studies investigating the effect of PDE5 inhibitors on ischemia-reperfusion injury, pressure overload-induced hypertrophy, and chemotoxicity suggested a possible clinical role for each of these medications; however, attempts to translate these findings to the bedside have resulted in mixed outcomes. In this review, we explore the biologic preclinical effects of PDE5 inhibitors in mediating cardioprotection. We then examine clinical trials investigating PDE5 inhibition in patients with heart failure, coronary artery disease, and ventricular arrhythmias and discuss why the studies likely have yet to show positive results and efficacy with PDE5 inhibition despite no safety concerns.

Feasibility of high-dose tadalafil and effects on insulin resistance in well-controlled patients with type 2 diabetes (MAKROTAD): a single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over phase 2 trial

Background

Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors exert positive vascular and metabolic effects in type 2 diabetes (T2D), but the effect on insulin resistance in T2D is unclear.

Methods

This randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover trial was conducted at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (Gothenburg, Sweden). Men without apparent erectile dysfunction (age 40-70 years) and women (age 55-70 years, post-menopause) diagnosed with T2D between 3 months and 10 years, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) < 60 mmol/mol and a body mass index (BMI) 27-40 kg/m² were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to one period of oral tadalafil 20 mg once a day and one period of placebo for 6 weeks, separated by an 8-week wash-out period. Placebo and tadalafil tablets were made visually indistinguishable and delivered randomized in two separate boxes for each participant. Both treatment periods ended with a glucose clamp, and measurements of body composition and metabolic markers in blood, subcutaneous and muscular interstitial fluid. The primary aim was to assess difference in whole-body insulin resistance after 6-weeks of treatment, determined after completion of the two study arms, and secondary aims were to study effects of tadalafil on pathophysiology of T2D as well as tolerability of high-dose tadalafil in T2D. Primary analysis was performed in participants with full analysis set (FAS) and safety analysis in all participants who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02601989), and EudraCT (2015-000573).

Findings

Between January 22nd, 2016, and January 31st, 2019, 23 participants with T2D were enrolled, of whom 18 were included in the full analysis set. The effect of tadalafil on insulin resistance was neutral compared with placebo. However, tadalafil decreased glycaemia measured as HbA1c (mean difference -2.50 mmol/mol, 95% confidence interval (CI), -4.20; -0.78, p = 0.005), and, further, we observed amelioration of endothelial function and markers of liver steatosis and glycolysis, whereas no statistically significant differences of other clinical phenotyping were shown. Muscle pain, dyspepsia, and headache were more frequent in participants on high-dose tadalafil compared with placebo (p < 0.05) but no difference between treatments appeared for serious adverse events.

Interpretation

High-dose tadalafil does not decrease whole-body insulin resistance, but increases microcirculation, induces positive effects in the liver and in intermediate metabolites, in parallel with an improved metabolic control measured as HbA1c. High-dose tadalafil is moderately well tolerated, warranting larger trials to define the optimal treatment regimen in T2D.

Funding

The Swedish Research Council, Swedish Diabetes Foundation, Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement, Sahlgrenska University Hospital funds, Gothenburg Society of Medicine, Eli Lilly & Company, USA, and Eli Lilly & Company, Sweden AB.

Effect of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors on major adverse cardiovascular events and overall mortality in a large nationwide cohort of men with erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular risk factors: A retrospective, observational study based on healthcare claims and national death index data

BACKGROUND

Treatment with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE-5is) is effective in treating erectile dysfunction (ED).

AIM

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of PDE-5is on the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events (MACE; composite outcome of CV death, hospitalization for myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke, heart failure, and unstable angina pectoris) and overall mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in a large US claims database in men with ≥1 diagnosis of ED without prior MACE within 1 year, from January 1, 2006, to October 31, 2020. The exposed group had ≥1 claim for PDE-5i and the unexposed group had no claims for PDE-5i, and the groups were matched up to 1:4 on baseline risk variables.

OUTCOME

The primary outcome was MACE and the secondary outcomes were overall mortality and individual components of MACE, determined by multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling.

RESULTS

Matched plus multivariable analyses showed that MACE was lower by 13% in men exposed (n = 23 816) to PDE-5is (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.95; P = .001) vs nonexposure (n = 48 682) over mean follow-up periods of 37 and 29 months, respectively, with lower incidence of coronary revascularization (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73-0.98; P = .029), heart failure (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.72-0.97; P = .016), unstable angina (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.64-0.96; P = .021), and CV death (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.41-0.90; P = .014) with PDE-5i exposure. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor-exposed men had a 25% lower incidence of overall mortality (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.65-0.87; P < .001). Men without coronary artery disease (CAD) but with CV risk factors at baseline showed a similar pattern. In the main study cohort, men in the highest quartile of PDE-5i exposure had the lowest incidence of MACE (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.37-0.54; P < .001) and overall mortality (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.37-0.71; P < .001) vs the lowest exposure quartile. In a subgroup with baseline type 2 diabetes (n = 6503), PDE-5i exposure was associated with a lower MACE risk (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.64-0.97; P = .022).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

PDE-5is may have cardioprotective effects.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Strengths are the large numbers of participants and consistency of the data; limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and unknown confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large population of US men with ED, PDE-5i exposure was associated with lower incidence of MACE, CV death, and overall mortality risk compared to non-exposure. Risk reduction correlated with PDE-5i exposure level.

Loss of soluble guanylyl cyclase in platelets contributes to atherosclerotic plaque formation and vascular inflammation

Variants in genes encoding the soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) in platelets are associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) risk. Here, by using histology, flow cytometry and intravital microscopy, we show that functional loss of sGC in platelets of atherosclerosis-prone Ldlr^-/- mice contributes to atherosclerotic plaque formation, particularly via increasing in vivo leukocyte adhesion to atherosclerotic lesions. In vitro experiments revealed that supernatant from activated platelets lacking sGC promotes leukocyte adhesion to endothelial cells (ECs) by activating ECs. Profiling of platelet-released cytokines indicated that reduced platelet angiopoietin-1 release by sGC-depleted platelets, which was validated in isolated human platelets from carriers of GUCY1A1 risk alleles, enhances leukocyte adhesion to ECs. I mp or ta ntly, p ha rm ac ol ogical sGC stimulation increased platelet angiopoietin-1 release in vitro and reduced leukocyte recruitment and atherosclerotic plaque formation in atherosclerosis-prone Ldlr^-/- mice. Therefore, pharmacological sGC stimulation might represent a potential therapeutic strategy to prevent and treat CAD.

Postimplant Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor Use in Centrifugal Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the association between phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE-5i) use and outcomes in patients with contemporary centrifugal flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs).

BACKGROUND

PDE-5i use may affect outcomes in patients with continuous flow LVADs.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support), with HeartMate 3 (n = 4,628) or HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD) (n = 2,601) implant were included in the analysis. The mean duration of follow-up was 11.94 ± 8.65 months. PDE-5is were used in 2,173 patients. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, and pump thrombosis. Propensity matching and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights were used to adjust for baseline differences between patients receiving and not receiving PDE-5i. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed for each outcome.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was lower in the PDE-5i group (adjusted HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.69-0.86; P < 0.0001; HeartMate 3: adjusted HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.92; P = 0.0044; HVAD: adjusted HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.66-0.88; P = 0.0002). All-cause mortality was lower with PDE-5is (adjusted HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.65-0.86; P < 0.0001; HeartMate 3: adjusted HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.57-0.86; P = 0.0007; HVAD: adjusted HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.65-0.94; P = 0.0098) and fewer ischemic strokes with PDE-5is were observed (adjusted HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.56-0.89; P = 0.003; HeartMate 3: adjusted HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.45-0.99; P = 0.045; HVAD: adjusted HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.56-0.97; P = 0.03). LVAD thrombosis was unchanged with PDE-5is, with overall low event rates observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Postimplant PDE-5i use was associated with lower mortality and ischemic strokes in patients with centrifugal flow LVADs.

Interactions between erectile dysfunction, cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular drugs

Sexual health has a fundamental role in overall health and well-being, and a healthy and dynamic sex life can make an important contribution to a good quality of life. Sexual dysfunction, and especially erectile dysfunction (ED) in men, is highly prevalent in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). CVD and ED have shared risk factors and pathophysiological links, such as endothelial dysfunction, inflammation and low plasma testosterone levels. ED has been shown to be an independent and early harbinger of future CVD events, providing an important window to initiate preventive measures. Therefore, screening and diagnosing ED is essential for the primary and secondary prevention of CVD because the assessment of ED offers an easy and low-cost prognostic tool that is an alternative to other investigational cardiovascular biomarkers. Moreover, ED is a major contributing factor to the discontinuation of, or poor adherence to, cardiovascular therapy. Cardiovascular drugs have divergent effects on erectile function, with diuretics and β-blockers having the worst profiles, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and nebivolol having the best profiles. Pharmacological treatment of ED has an equivocal effect on the risk of CVD, suggesting a complex interaction between ED and drugs for CVD. In this Review, we discuss how sexual function could be incorporated into the patient history taken by physicians treating individuals with CVD, not merely as part of the diagnostic work-up but as a means to pursue tangible and essential benefits in quality of life and cardiovascular outcomes.

Cardiovascular Outcome Risks in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Co-Prescribed a Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor (PDE5i) and a Nitrate: A Retrospective Observational Study Using Electronic Health Record Data in the United States

BACKGROUND

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) are first-line therapy for erectile dysfunction (ED). Approximately 1-4% of PDE5i recipients co-possess nitrates, despite this combination potentially producing clinically significant hypotension. Real-world data in these patients and insights into prescriber rationales for co-prescription are limited.

AIM

This study investigated whether PDE5i and nitrate co-possession is associated with increased rates of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes.

METHODS

Adult males with ED and PDE5i prescription and males with nitrate prescription were identified from a U.S. electronic health record database (2012-2016). Quantitative comparisons were made between patients with ED and co-possession (ED + PDE5i + nitrate), only nitrate possession (ED + nitrate and nitrate only [without ED]), and only PDE5i possession (ED + PDE5i).

OUTCOMES

We quantified incidence of CV outcomes in co-possession and comparator periods, calculating incidence rate ratios after propensity score matching. Prescriber rationales were derived by reviewing virtual patient records.

RESULTS

Over 168,000 patients had ≥1 PDE5i prescription (∼241,000 possession periods); >480,000 patients had ≥1 nitrate prescription (∼486,000 possession periods); and 3,167 patients had 3,668 co-possession periods. Non-significantly different or lower rates of CV outcomes were observed for co-possession periods vs ED + nitrate and nitrate only periods. Most CV outcome rates were non-significantly different between co-possession and ED + PDE5i periods (myocardial infarction, hospitalized unstable angina and fainting were higher with co-possession). From qualitative assessment of patient records with co-possession, 131 of 252 (52%) documented discussion with a physician regarding co-possession; 69 of 131 (53%) warned or instructed on safely managing these contraindicated medications.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Findings from this real-world study indicate that co-possession of nitrate and PDE5i prescriptions is not associated with increased rates of CV outcomes, relative to possession of nitrates alone. Physicians should and often do discuss the risks of using both medications together with their patients.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

Strengths of this study are the large size of the U.S. real-world patient cohort with data available for analysis, and our ability to utilize natural language processing to explore co-prescription rationales and patient-physician interactions. Limitations are the retrospective nature of the analysis and inability to establish whether recorded prescriptions were filled or the medication was consumed.

CONCLUSION

Co-exposure of PDE5i and nitrates should continue to be avoided; however, co-possession of PDE5i and nitrate prescriptions is not necessarily associated with increased CV risk. Co-possession can be successfully managed in suitable circumstances. Nunes AP, Seeger JD, Stewart A, et al. Cardiovascular Outcome Risks in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Co-Prescribed a Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor (PDE5i) and a Nitrate: A Retrospective Observational Study Using Electronic Health Record Data in the United States. J Sex Med 2021;18:1511-1523.

Anatomy, Pathophysiology, Molecular Mechanisms, and Clinical Management of Erectile Dysfunction in Patients Affected by Coronary Artery Disease: A Review

Erectile dysfunction (ED) has been defined as the inability to attain or maintain penile erection sufficient for successful sexual intercourse. ED carries a notable influence on life quality, with significant implications for family and social relationships. Because atherosclerosis of penile arteries represents one of the most frequent ED causes, patients presenting with it should always be investigated for potential coexistent coronary or peripheral disease. Up to 75% of ED patients have a stenosis of the iliac-pudendal-penile arteries, supplying the male genital organ’s perfusion. Recently, pathophysiology and molecular basis of male erection have been elucidated, giving the ground to pharmacological and mechanical revascularization treatment of this condition. This review will focus on the normal anatomy and physiology of erection, the pathophysiology of ED, the relation between ED and cardiovascular diseases, and, lastly, on the molecular basis of erectile dysfunction.