Thrombolysis or Surgery in Patients With Obstructive Mechanical Valve Thrombosis: The Multicenter HATTUSHA Study

Successful Thrombolytic Therapy for Mechanical Mitral Valve Thrombosis Using Bivalirudin-Based Thrombolytic Regimen

Distinguishing the cause of a mechanical valve obstruction as a thrombus or a pannus can be difficult but is critical because pannus can be treated only with surgical valve replacement and thrombus can be treated with surgery or fibrinolytic therapy. This case report describes a patient with a mechanical valve thrombosis and reported allergy to porcine products who was treated by an unusual regimen: ultraslow-infusion, low-dose fibrinolytic therapy with administration of bivalirudin as a bridging anticoagulant.

Assessment of Genetic Variants Linked to Susceptibility to Mechanical Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis

Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a critical and life-threatening condition driven by multifactorial etiologies, including genetic predispositions. The study was designed as a single-center retrospective manner. Echocardiographic features and genetic test including factor II/prothrombin (G20210A), factor V Leiden (G1691A), factor V R2 (A4070G), apolipoprotein (Apo) B-100 (G10708A), ApoE (C112R), ApoE (R158C), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T, MTHFR A1298C, factor XIII G103T (V34L), β-fibrinogen (455G>A), PAI-1 4G/5G, and HPA-1 GPIIIa (T196C) genotyping variations were assessed. We performed genetic tests on 175 patients with PVT (biologically women [n = 124, 70.9%], with a mean age of 49.8 ± 13.1 years) and 101 patients (biologically women [n = 57, 56.4%], with a mean age of 54.7 ± 13.6 years) without thrombus formation. The thrombosis group was significantly younger compared with controls (p = 0.004). The percentage of patients with mechanical aortic valves was significantly lower in the thrombosis group compared with controls (22.3% vs 34.7%, p = 0.025). A significant difference was observed between the thrombosis and control groups regarding the genotype ratios of factor II/prothrombin (G20210A) (heterozygous, 6.8% vs 1%, p = 0.043) and HPA-1 GPIIIa (T196C) (homozygous mutant, 7.8% vs 0%, p = 0.034). In addition, there was a significant association of heterozygous MTHFR (A1298C) variation with obstructive thrombosis compared with nonobstructive thrombosis (46.9% vs 29.2%, p = 0.046). In conclusion, this is the first study to report a potential association between genetic variants, including HPA-1 GPIIIa (T196C), factor II/prothrombin (G20210A), MTHFR (A1298C), and PVT, necessitating extensive further research and additional clinical consideration.

Incidence and outcomes of prosthetic valve thrombosis during peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

OBJECTIVES

In the context of postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) following valve replacement surgery, it may be necessary to implant a peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (pVA-ECMO). This procedure, however, carries a risk of prosthetic valve thrombosis. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the incidence and outcomes of prosthetic valve thrombosis after VA-ECMO support for PCCS and to report the associated risk factors.

METHODS

All consecutive adult patients who received pVA-ECMO for PCCS following a valve replacement procedure between January 2015 and October 2019 in our institution were included in this retrospective study. Outcome variables were prosthetic valve thrombosis, 30-day and hospital survival, pVA-ECMO-associated adverse events and surgery-related adverse events.

RESULTS

During the 4-year study period, 549 patients received pVA-ECMO for PCCS. Among them, 152 had undergone a valve replacement procedure and 9 of these developed prosthetic valve thrombosis. The incidence of valve thrombosis at 30 days was 7.5 ± 2%. The cumulative incidence of prosthetic valve thrombosis was significantly lower with pVA-ECMO + intra-aortic balloon pump versus VA-ECMO alone (1.4 ± 1.4% vs 13.7 ± 4.7%, P = 0.021, respectively). Intra-aortic balloon pump use associated with pVA-ECMO (versus pVA-ECMO alone) was an independent protective factor against hospital death [odds ratio = 0.180 (0.068-0.478), P = 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

After PCCS following valve replacement surgery, peripheral femoro-femoral VA-ECMO is associated with a low risk of acute valve thrombosis especially when associated with an intra-aortic balloon pump.

Successful nonsurgical therapeutic management in a case of early mechanical aortic prosthetic thrombosis and coronary embolism after a modified Bentall procedure

Prosthetic valve thrombosis, although rare, is a life-threatening complication of valve replacement surgery. The authors present an atypical case of a modified Bentall procedure with the CarboSeal Valsalva™ conduit complicated by an early mechanical prosthetic aortic valve thrombosis and coronary embolism. The patient was successfully treated with an emergency percutaneous coronary angioplasty and intracoronary thrombus aspiration of the left anterior descending artery, followed by a systemic 10 mg bolus of tissue plasminogen activator followed by ultraslow (25 h) infusion of low-dose (25 mg), while supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Surgery Versus Thrombolytic Therapy for the Management of Left-Sided Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis Without Hemodynamic Compromise: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy in prosthetic heart valve thrombosis (PVT) remains controversial, with no randomized trials and conflicting observational data. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence comparing systemic thrombolysis and cardiac surgery in PVT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase for studies on treatment strategies in patients with left-sided PVT since 2000. The primary outcome was death, and the secondary outcomes were major bleeding and thromboembolism during follow-up (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews No. CRD42022384092). We identified 2298 studies, of which 16 were included, comprising 1389 patients with PVT (mean age, 50.4±9.3 years; 60.0% women). Among them, 67.2% were New York Heart Association stage III/IV at admission. Overall, 48.1% were treated with systemic thrombolysis and 51.9% with cardiac surgery. The mortality rate was 10.8% in the thrombolysis group and 15.3% in the surgery group. The pooled risk difference for death with systemic thrombolysis was 1.13 (exact CI, 0.74-1.79; ζ2=0.89; P<0.001) versus cardiac surgery. Rates of both transient ischemic attack and non-central nervous system embolism were higher in the thrombolysis group (P=0.002 and P=0.02, respectively). Treatment success, major bleeding, and stroke were similar between groups. Sensitivity analysis including studies that used low-dose or slow-infusion thrombolysis showed that the mortality rate was lower, and treatment success was higher, in patients referred to systemic thrombolysis, with similar rates of other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence to suggest that thrombolysis might be the preferred option for the management of PVT without cardiogenic shock, pending future randomized controlled trials or larger observational studies.

Treatment of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Thrombosis: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) thrombosis may manifest as subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) and clinical valve thrombosis. SLT is relatively common (10%-20%) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, but clinical implications are uncertain. Clinical valve thrombosis is rare (1.2%) and associated with bioprosthetic valve failure, neurologic or thromboembolic events, heart failure, and death. Treatment for TAV thrombosis has been understudied. In principle, anticoagulation may prevent TAV thrombosis. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants, as compared to antiplatelet therapy, are associated with reduced incidence of SLT, although at the cost of higher bleeding and all-cause mortality risk. We present an overview of existing literature for management of TAV thrombosis and propose a rational treatment algorithm. Vitamin K antagonists or non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants are the cornerstone of antithrombotic treatment. In therapy-resistant or clinically unstable patients, ultraslow, low-dose infusion of thrombolytics seems effective and safe and may be preferred over redo-transcatheter aortic valve replacement or explant surgery.

Mechanical valve thrombosis: Current management and differences between guidelines

All foreign bodies inserted in the circulatory system are thrombogenic and require temporary or lifelong antithrombotic therapies to prevent thrombosis. The adequate level of anticoagulation during the first few months determines the long-term durability, particularly for mechanical prostheses, and also for biological valves. Suboptimal anticoagulation is the most frequent source of mechanical valve thrombosis (MVT). The patient's clinical presentation decides how mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction is managed. If the mechanical valve thrombosis is obstructive and the patient is in a critical condition with hemodynamic instability, an immediate surgical intervention should be performed. The thrombolytic treatment is an option for left mechanical valve thrombosis in patients who have high surgical risk and no contraindications and also for right heart valve thrombosis. In non-obstructive thrombosis on the mechanical valve, patients can be asymptomatic, requiring optimization of the anticoagulant treatment. Both obstructive and non-obstructive thrombus formed on the mechanical prosthesis can result in embolic events. If the thrombus persists following anticoagulant treatment, the recommended options include thrombolytic treatment or redo surgery. Pannus can also cause obstruction of the prosthesis for which surgical treatment is the only option. While these clinical scenarios may initially appear to have straightforward solutions in terms of surgery, thrombolysis, or effective anticoagulation, real-world clinical experience often proves more complex. For instance, a patient with some usual comorbidities and non-obstructive mechanical valve thrombosis, experiencing symptoms solely by repeated systemic embolizations, might undergo all three therapeutic options due to the unpredictable nature of MVT. Therefore, treatment indications can intersect both on the time axis and depending on the patient's clinical status and the expertise of the center where he is hospitalized. Moreover, the European and American guidelines show subtle but important differences. The aim of this review was to compare these differences, comment on recent studies and evidence gaps, propose a more pragmatic algorithm combining all current recommendations, and highlight important research directions for this disease that has dominated the cardiovascular landscape for more than five decades, but for which there have been no significant recent changes in management.

Thromboaspiration of a left-sided bioprosthetic valve thrombosis by a mini-access: the Lausanne novel procedure

Left-sided bioprosthesis valve thrombosis (LSBVT) is a challenging complication necessitating invasive interventions. In this study, we introduce a novel, minimally invasive approach. We used a cerebral embolic protection system and an Occlutech cannula connected to an extracorporeal circuit, providing safer thrombus aspiration compared to the AngioVac system. This technique offers a promising alternative for high-risk patients with LSBVT.

Combination anticoagulation strategy in pregnancy with mechanical valves: The KYBELE study

BACKGROUND

Optimal first-trimester anticoagulation is still challenging in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves (MHVs) requiring high-dose warfarin. This multicenter prospective study aims to determine the optimal anticoagulation regimens for pregnant patients with MHVs.

METHODS

All women were allocated to one of three treatment options during first trimester including lone low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), combination of LMWH + 2.5 mg warfarin, and LMWH+4 mg warfarin. Primary maternal outcome included a combination of death, thromboembolism, severe bleeding, and need for treatment of mechanical valve thrombosis (MVT). Any fetal loss was determined as primary fetal outcome.

RESULTS

The study included 78 pregnancies in 65 women with MHVs. Primary maternal outcome rate was 44%, 12.5%, 3.5%, respectively. The rates of primary maternal outcome (44 vs 3.5%, P < .001), obstructive MVT (16 vs 0%, P = .04), MVT requiring treatment (28 vs 0%, P = .003), and cerebral embolism (24 vs 3.4%, P = .041) were found to be significantly higher in lone LMWH group compared to LMWH + 4 mg warfarin group. Moreover, the rates of primary maternal outcome (12.5 vs 44%, P = .015) and treatment for MHV thrombus (4.2 vs 28%, P = .049) were significantly lower in LMWH + 2.5 mg warfarin group compared to lone LMWH group. The incidences of fetal loss were 8 (32%) in the lone LMWH group, 8 (33.3%) in LMWH + 2.5 mg warfarin group, and 11 (37.9%) in LMWH + 4 mg warfarin group (P = .890 for 3-group).Warfarin related-embryopathy was not observed in any case.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined anticoagulation strategy of LMWH plus low-dose warfarin during the first trimester of pregnancy may result in less maternal complications with comparable fetal outcomes in patients with MHVs.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is thought to be safer for the fetus, however it is suspected to be less protective for the mother. To solve this dilemma, the authors suggested a novel anticoagulation strategy in pregnant women with prosthetic valves. Seventy-eight pregnancies of 65 women (median age 32 [27-35] years) were included in the study. A combination of LMWH and a reduced dose warfarin were associated with low rates of thrombus-related complications in pregnant patients with mechanical heart valves.

Mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis: A literature review of treatment strategies

Mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis (MPVT) is a common complication of valvular implantations. This study compared the efficacy and safety of different treatments for MPVT. A systematic search of electronic databases identified studies evaluating surgical, anticoagulant, and thrombolytic therapies. Although several studies of different types have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of these treatment strategies the lack of randomized controlled trials has resulted in the inability to make a definitive conclusion about the pros and cons of these treatments. Recent treatments, such as slow and ultraslow infusion of thrombolytics, showed comparable efficacy and lower complication rates than traditional methods. Inadequate anticoagulant use is a major risk factor for MPVT, highlighting the importance of prevention. Treatment selection should be individualized based on patient factors and available expertise. Overall, slow and ultraslow infusion of thrombolytics may be a promising treatment option for MPVT.

Management of prosthetic valve thrombosis with unfractionated heparin

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a severe and life-threatening complication. Surgery and thrombolytic therapy (TT) carry a high risk, and in several circumstances, optimal anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusion may be an alternative treatment. This study aimed to assess the results of UFH in patients diagnosed with both obstructive and non-obstructive PVT.

METHODS

This observational retrospective study enrolled patients who had contraindications for TT and surgery underwent UFH therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients were enrolled [male: 55 (40.4%), mean age: 50.3 ± 14.6 years] in the study. In the successful group, 66 patients (48,5%) showed >75% regression in the thrombus burden without facing death or major non-fatal complications.In the unsuccessful group, 56 had less than a 50% reduction in thrombus load and 14 (10.3%) suffered major complications. The presence of obstruction (27.1% vs. 12.1%; p = 0.028), thrombus area 1.1 cm2 vs. 0.8 cm2; p = 0.005] and the duration of UFH treatment (15.1 vs. 11.8 (days); p = 0.005) were significantly higher in the unsuccessful UFH group.In multivariate regression analyses the presence of obstruction (RR: 3.088, p = 0.020), increased thrombus area (RR: 2.400; p = 0.015), and increased duration of UFH therapy (RR: 1.073 95%, p = 0.012) were identified as independent predictive parameters for a failed UFH therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that UFH therapy may be considered a relatively beneficial treatment strategy for some patients with PVT. The most significant factors affecting success are the obstructive nature and area of the thrombus.

Monocyte to HDL ratio may predict thrombosis in patients with mechanical mitral and aortic valve prosthesis

Increased inflammatory biomarkers have been reported in prosthetic heart valve thrombosis (PHVT). Monocyte to HDL ratio (MHR) and albumin to CRP levels (CAR) are two biomarkers used widely for systemic inflammation but there is a lack of data on prosthetic heart valves. This study aimed to find out the potential predictive value of MHR and CAR for PHVT. Patients who had the diagnosis of mechanical mitral/aortic PHVT and normally functioning prosthesis were retrospectively analyzed. Laboratory data including complete blood count and biochemistry were recorded. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed to diagnose PHVT. The study included 118 patients with mechanical PHVT and 120 patients with normally functioning prosthesis. White blood count, monocyte levels, C-reactive protein, MHR and CAR were significantly higher whereas the lymphocyte, HDL and INR levels on admission were lower in patients with PHVT. Multivariate analysis showed that as well as inadequate anticoagulation, MHR, but not CAR, was found to be an independent predictor of thrombosis in patients with PHVT. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to detect the best cut-off value of MHR in the prediction of thrombosis in patients with prosthetic valves. MHR level of > 12.8 measured on admission, yielded an AUC value of 0.791 [(CI 95% 0.733-0.848 p < 0.001) sensitivity 71%, specificity 70%]. Inadequate anticoagulation is the primary cause that leads to thrombosis in mechanical prosthetic valves. Increased MHR, but not CAR, was also shown to be an independent predictor of thrombosis in patients with mechanical mitral and aortic prosthetic valves.

Acute heart failure and valvular heart disease: A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association, the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology

Acute heart failure (AHF) represents a broad spectrum of disease states, resulting from the interaction between an acute precipitant and a patient's underlying cardiac substrate and comorbidities. Valvular heart disease (VHD) is frequently associated with AHF. AHF may result from several precipitants that add an acute haemodynamic stress superimposed on a chronic valvular lesion or may occur as a consequence of a new significant valvular lesion. Regardless of the mechanism, clinical presentation may vary from acute decompensated heart failure to cardiogenic shock. Assessing the severity of VHD as well as the correlation between VHD severity and symptoms may be difficult in patients with AHF because of the rapid variation in loading conditions, concomitant destabilization of the associated comorbidities and the presence of combined valvular lesions. Evidence-based interventions targeting VHD in settings of AHF have yet to be identified, as patients with severe VHD are often excluded from randomized trials in AHF, so results from these trials do not generalize to those with VHD. Furthermore, there are not rigorously conducted randomized controlled trials in the setting of VHD and AHF, most of the data coming from observational studies. Thus, distinct to chronic settings, current guidelines are very elusive when patients with severe VHD present with AHF, and a clear-cut strategy could not be yet defined. Given the paucity of evidence in this subset of AHF patients, the aim of this scientific statement is to describe the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and overall treatment approach for patients with VHD who present with AHF.

Management of Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve Thrombosis: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Mechanical prosthetic heart valves, though more durable than bioprostheses, are more thrombogenic and require lifelong anticoagulation. Mechanical valve dysfunction can be caused by 4 main phenomena: 1) thrombosis; 2) fibrotic pannus ingrowth; 3) degeneration; and 4) endocarditis. Mechanical valve thrombosis (MVT) is a known complication with clinical presentation ranging from incidental imaging finding to cardiogenic shock. Thus, a high index of suspicion and expedited evaluation are essential. Multimodality imaging, including echocardiography, cine-fluoroscopy, and computed tomography, is commonly used to diagnose MVT and follow treatment response. Although surgery is oftentimes required for obstructive MVT, other guideline-recommended therapies include parenteral anticoagulation and thrombolysis. Transcatheter manipulation of stuck mechanical valve leaflet is another treatment option for those with contraindications to thrombolytic therapy or prohibitive surgical risk or as a bridge to surgery. The optimal strategy depends on degree of valve obstruction and the patient's comorbidities and hemodynamic status on presentation.

Editor-in-Chief's Top Picks From 2022

Each week, I record audio summaries for every paper in JACC, as well as an issue summary. This process has become a true labor of love due to the time they require, but I am motivated by the sheer number of listeners (16 million plus), and it has allowed me to familiarize myself with every paper that we publish. Thus, I have selected the top 100 papers (both Original Investigations and Review Articles) from distinct specialties each year. In addition to my personal choices, I have included papers that have been the most accessed or downloaded on our websites, as well as those selected by the JACC Editorial Board members. In order to present the full breadth of this important research in a consumable fashion, we will present these abstracts in this issue of JACC, as well as their Central Illustrations and podcasts. The highlights comprise the following sections: Basic & Translational Research, Cardiac Failure & Myocarditis, Cardiomyopathies & Genetics, Cardio-Oncology, Congenital Heart Disease, Coronary Disease & Interventions, Coronavirus, Hypertension, Imaging, Metabolic & Lipid Disorders, Neurovascular Disease & Dementia, Promoting Health & Prevention, Rhythm Disorders & Thromboembolism, and Valvular Heart Disease.^1-100.

Comparison between surgery and fibrinolytic therapy in prosthetic valve thrombosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a rare but life-threatening complication. Surgery and fibrinolytic therapy (FT) are the two main treatment options for PVT. The choice between surgery and FT has always been a matter of debate. Previous studies have shown that although the mortality rate is higher in surgery, complications are less frequent than in FT. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the results of surgery and FT in PVT.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed through Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, encompassing all studies comparing surgery and FT in PVT. The rate of each complication and risk ratio (RR) of complications in surgery and FT were assessed using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies with 1235 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled risk of the mortality was not significantly different between FT and surgery in patients with PVT (pooled RR = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38-1.60, I² = 61.4%). The pooled risks of thromboembolic events (pooled RR = 4.70, 95% CI: 1.83-12.07, I² = 49.6%) and major bleeding (pooled RR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.09-5.50, I² = 41.1%) and PVT recurrence (pooled RR = 2.06 95% CI: 1.29-3.27, I² = 0.0%) were significantly higher in patients who received FT.

CONCLUSION

Surgery may be safer and with fewer complications than FT for PVT treatment. However, randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the proper treatment for PVT.

A case of early thrombosis following a percutaneous tricuspid valve in valve implantation managed by thrombolysis

Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis (BPVT) is a growing recognized entity, especially with the increasing use of the valve in vale procedures and the advent of new detection technologies (e.g., 4D CT and 4D echocardiography). The incidence of BPVT is higher in transcatheter valves than surgically implanted bioprosthetic valves. However, the best thromboprophylaxis regimen and optimal management strategy in the acute context remain unknown. This paper presents a case of early thrombosis following the percutaneous tricuspid valve in vale procedure that was successfully managed with thrombolysis.