Acute Cardiac Events During COVID-19-Associated Hospitalizations

Cardiac Events in Adults Hospitalized for Respiratory Syncytial Virus vs COVID-19 or Influenza

Importance

Respiratory viral infections (RVIs) are associated with elevated cardiovascular risk; however, less is known about cardiac complications after hospitalization for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vs other vaccine-preventable RVIs (COVID-19 or influenza).

Objective

To compare the risk of acute cardiovascular complications in adults hospitalized for RSV vs COVID-19 or influenza.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-based cross-sectional study, conducted before RSV vaccination rollout in Singapore, assessed all adults hospitalized for RSV or influenza (January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2024) and all adults hospitalized for COVID-19 during Omicron XBB/JN.1 transmission (January 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024).

Exposure

Hospitalization for RSV, influenza (vaccinated or unvaccinated), or COVID-19 (boosted [≥3 vaccine doses] or unboosted [<3 vaccine doses]).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Cardiovascular events during RSV, influenza, or COVID-19 hospitalization, defined as any cardiac, cerebrovascular, or thrombotic event, occurring from admission until discharge or death. Odds of any cardiovascular event (RSV vs COVID-19 or RSV vs influenza) and severe RVI (intensive care unit admission) with or without an acute cardiovascular event were estimated using multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

Results

A total of 32 960 RVI hospitalizations (mean [SD] patient age, 66.58 [18.99] years; 17 056 [51.7%] female) were included (2148 for RSV, 14 389 for influenza, and 16 423 for COVID-19). Of the 2148 patients hospitalized for RSV, 234 (10.9%) had an acute cardiovascular event. Higher odds of any acute cardiovascular event (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.12-1.54) as well as other individual cardiac events were observed in RSV hospitalizations vs boosted COVID-19 (dysrhythmia: AOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.19-1.94; heart failure: AOR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.30-2.35). Similarly, higher odds of any acute cardiovascular event (AOR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.24-2.01) as well as dysrhythmias or heart failure were observed in patients hospitalized for RSV vs unboosted COVID-19. Odds of a cardiovascular event were not significantly different in RSV vs influenza, except among contemporaneous hospitalizations after the pandemic (2023-2024), where odds of heart failure (AOR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.21-3.59) were significantly higher in RSV hospitalizations vs vaccine-breakthrough influenza hospitalizations. Occurrence of a cardiovascular event was associated with greater odds of severe RSV requiring intensive care unit admission (AOR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.21-4.62).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study, 1 in 10 patients hospitalized for RSV had a concurrent acute cardiovascular event. Odds of cardiac events were significantly higher in RSV vs COVID-19 hospitalizations in both vaccine-boosted and unboosted individuals. In contemporaneous hospitalizations for RSV or influenza after the pandemic (2023-2024), odds of heart failure were significantly higher in RSV hospitalizations vs vaccine-breakthrough influenza hospitalizations. These findings suggest that patients with preexisting cardiovascular risk should consider vaccination against RVIs.

Long-term sequelae post-hospitalization for respiratory syncytial virus vs. Omicron SARS-CoV-2 or influenza in adults and children: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Risk of long-term sequelae after COVID-19 hospitalization is well documented in adults and children; however, less is known about long-term sequelae after hospitalization for other respiratory viral infections (RVIs), such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). We sought to compare long-term sequelae after RSV hospitalization, contrasted against Omicron COVID-19 and influenza, in children and adults.

METHODS

This retrospective population-based cohort study in Singapore included all hospitalizations for RSV/influenza from 1 January 2017 to 3 September 2023, and all COVID-19 hospitalizations after Omicron emergence (1 January 2022-3 September 2023). Risks of new-incident diagnoses/symptoms 31-300 days following (a) RSV vs. COVID-19 hospitalization; (b) RSV vs. influenza hospitalization, across multiple organ systems, were estimated using Cox regression, adjusted for between-group sociodemographic and clinical differences using overlap weighting.

RESULTS

24 340 paediatric RVI hospitalizations (RSV = 8640; influenza = 9400; COVID-19 = 6300) and 82 635 adult RVI hospitalizations (RSV = 1553; influenza = 10 454; COVID-19 = 70 628) were included. In children, post-RSV hospitalization, higher risk and excess burden (EB) per 1000 individuals of any overall new-incident diagnosis were observed when contrasted against COVID-19/influenza (COVID-19: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.63 [95% CI: 1.24-2.14], EB = 9.83 [95% CI: 5.26-14.41]; influenza: aHR = 1.76 [95% CI: 1.37-2.28], EB = 10.91 [95% CI: 6.78-15.04]); risks of respiratory sequelae predominated. In adults, though there was no significant difference in overall risk of post-acute sequelae between RSV and COVID-19/influenza, elevated risk of cardiovascular symptoms (aHR = 1.58 [95% CI: 1.13-2.22]) and other neurological disorders (aHR = 1.92 [95% CI: 1.31-2.80]) was observed in RSV hospitalizations vs. COVID-19.

DISCUSSION

Although risks of predominantly respiratory sequelae were elevated post-RSV hospitalization in children vs. COVID-19 or influenza, higher risk of extra-pulmonary sequelae (cardiovascular/neurological complications) was observed post-RSV hospitalization vs. COVID-19 in adults. Elevated risks at extremes of age highlight the importance of RSV vaccination in these vulnerable groups.

Burden and characteristics of Respiratory Syncytial Virus-associated respiratory tract infections in adult patients in the winter season 2023/2024 at the conservative emergency department of the university hospital in Dresden

INTRODUCTION

The burden of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) associated adult emergency department visits in comparison to other respiratory viruses like Influenza and SARS-CoV-2 remains less studied.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study to describe prevalence, severity and risk factors of RSV infection, proven by polymerase chain reaction from nasopharyngeal or pharyngeal swabs, in consecutive adult patients presenting to the emergency ward of the University Hospital Dresden with a working diagnosis of acute respiratory tract infection during the winter season between October 1st 2023 and April 15th 2024.

RESULTS

1764 adults (56.3% male) between 18 and 101 years old (median age 69 years) were included in the analysis. 477 patients (27.1%) tested positive for viral infection; 284 (16.2%) with SARS-CoV-2 (median age 79 years), 147 (8.4%) with Influenza A or B (median age 56 years) and 38 (2.2%) with RSV A or B (median age 79 years). In 8 patients (0.5%) a co-infection with two viruses was detected. In the RSV cohort any oxygen support was significantly higher (63.2%) compared to the Influenza (34.0%, p < 0.001) and SARS-CoV-2 (41.5%, p = 0.012) cohorts. In-hospital mortality was considerable especially for RSV with 7.9% compared to Influenza (2.7%, p = 0.138) and SARS-CoV-2 (5.6%, p = 0.580).

CONCLUSION

RSV was less frequent in adults presenting to the emergency department during the 2023/24 season compared to SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza, but patients needed a higher level of respiratory support. Also, in-hospital mortality was considerable, making RSV-infections a relevant pathogen in adult patients presenting with respiratory tract infection to an emergency department.

Costs and Healthcare Utilization of Heart Disease by COVID-19 Diagnosis and Race and Ethnicity

Introduction

Heart disease poses a significant health and economic burden in the U.S., with considerable variations in outcomes across different racial and ethnic groups. The COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted the disparities in healthcare utilization and costs associated with heart disease.

Methods

The authors used the 2021 Merative MarketScan Medicaid claims database to estimate the medical costs and healthcare utilization associated with heart disease by racial and ethnic groups and COVID-19 diagnosis status. This study focused on individuals aged ≥18 years continuously enrolled in a noncapitated insurance plan in 2021. The outcome measures included total medical expenditures and healthcare utilization, including the numbers of emergency department visits and inpatient admissions and length of inpatient stay. The authors employed a generalized linear model with a family of gamma and log links for medical costs, and a negative binomial regression was used for healthcare utilization. Three-way interactions of heart disease, COVID-19 diagnosis, and race and ethnicity categories were implemented after adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities. The authors reported average marginal effects with 95% CIs.

Results

Among 1,008,166 Medicaid beneficiaries, 8% had heart disease in 2021. The cost associated with heart disease was $10,819 per beneficiary in 2021 (95% CI=10,292; 11,347; p<0.001). The cost was $15,840 (95% CI=14,389; 17,291; p<0.001) for non-Hispanic Black individuals; $9,945 (95% CI=9,172; 10,718; p<0.001) for non-Hispanic White; and $8,511 (95% CI=7,490; 9,531; p<0.001) for Hispanic individuals. Individuals with a COVID-19 diagnosis ($19,638) had $9,541 (95% CI=7,049; 12,032; p<0.001) higher costs associated with heart disease than those without COVID-19 ($10,098) (p<0.001). Individuals with heart disease had higher numbers of emergency department visits (0.937 per beneficiary, 95% CI=0.913; 0.960), inpatient admissions (0.463 per beneficiary, 95% CI=0.455; 0.471), and average length of stay (2.541 days per admission, 95% CI=2.405; 2.677) than those without heart disease.

Conclusions

The study's findings showed that costs and healthcare utilization associated with heart disease are substantial in all racial and ethnic groups and the highest among non-Hispanic Black individuals. Furthermore, individuals with a COVID-19 diagnosis had approximately 2 times higher costs associated with heart disease than individuals without a COVID-19 diagnosis.

Temporal trends and disparities in atherosclerosis-associated cerebrovascular disease mortality in the United States, 1999-2020

BACKGROUND

Cerebrovascular disease (CEVD) accounts for the second leading cause of death worldwide. Despite recent advancements in treatment strategies, the prevalence and cost associated with CEVD are rising. Atherosclerosis significantly contributes to CEVD risk by restricting cerebral blood flow, leading to ischemic stroke. This study aims to analyze trends in atherosclerosis-associated CEVD mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2020 to inform targeted prevention and management strategies.

METHODS

We examined death certificates sourced from the CDC WONDER database, from 1999 to 2020 to identify atherosclerosis-associated CEVD mortality. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 persons and annual percent changes were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 325,401 deaths occurred from CEVD among adults with atherosclerosis from 1999 to 2020 in the US. The overall AAMR initially inclined from 10.9 in 1999 to 12.6 in 2001, followed by a decrease to 4.2 in 2016, and then a rise till 2020 was observed. Males had consistently higher AAMRs than females throughout the study period (Men = 11.9 vs Women = 10.1). When stratified by race, AAMRs were highest among non-Hispanic (NH) Whites (6.9), followed by NH American Indian/Alaska Native (10.9), NH Blacks/African Americans (6.6), Hispanics (4.9), and lastly by Asian/Pacific Islanders (4.2). The Western region had the highest mortality (AAMR: 7.7).

CONCLUSION

The CEVD mortality rates of adults with atherosclerosis- are increasing in the adult U.S.

POPULATION

This underscores the need for increased screening, aggressive management, and subsequent surveillance of patients at risk.

[Mechanisms of prolonged symptoms following acute COVID-19: Some pathophysiological pathways]

INTRODUCTION

Following the Omicron wave in early 2022, an estimated 60-70% of the French population was infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. One out of ten infected subjects could have persistent symptoms three months after infection, representing a public health challenge.

CURRENT STATE OF KNOWLEDGE

The persistent symptoms may be secondary to diverse entities with distinct mechanisms. While organic infection sequelae occur mainly after severe COVID-19, some symptoms appear to be essentially psychological in origin; in addition, many subjects present stereotyped symptoms of fluctuating intensity with no identified anatomical or psychic substratum, often in the aftermath of a benign infection. The most frequent complaints are fatigue, pain, dyspnea and difficulty concentrating.

PERSPECTIVES

The hypotheses explored to explain these symptoms include: persistent immune dysfunction, inducted autoimmunity, and microbiome disturbances. Persistent viral antigens may lie at the crossroads of these mechanisms. To date, these different etiological avenues have yet to lead to the development of diagnostic tests or specific therapeutic strategies.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged symptoms after COVID-19 correspond to heterogeneous nosological entities with poorly understood mechanisms.

Trends in COVID-19-Attributable Hospitalizations Among Adults With Laboratory-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2-COVID-NET, June 2020 to September 2023

BACKGROUND

Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection among hospital admissions made interpretation of COVID-19 hospitalization data challenging as SARS-CoV-2-positive persons with mild or asymptomatic infection may be incorrectly identified as COVID-19-associated hospitalizations. The study objective is to estimate the proportion of hospitalizations likely attributable to COVID-19 among SARS-CoV-2-positive hospitalized patients.

METHODS

A sample of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2-positive hospitalizations from the COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (COVID-NET) from June 2020 to September 2023 was analyzed, with a focus on July 2022 to September 2023. Likely COVID-19-attributable hospitalizations were defined as hospitalizations among SARS-CoV-2-positive non-pregnant adults ages ≥ 18 years with COVID-19-related presenting complaint, treatment, or discharge diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among 44,816 sampled hospitalizations, 90% met the definition of likely COVID-19-attributable. Among the 9866 admissions occurring during July 2022 to September 2023, 86% were likely COVID-19-attributable; 87% had a COVID-19-related presenting complaint, 64% received steroids or COVID-19-related treatment, 47% had respiratory- and 10% had coagulopathy-related discharge diagnoses, and 39% had COVID-19 as the principal discharge diagnosis code. More than 70% met ≥ 2 criteria. Compared with likely COVID-19-attributable hospitalizations, SARS-CoV-2-positive patients who did not meet the case definition were more likely to be ages 18-49 years (27% vs. 13%), have no underlying medical conditions (14% vs. 4%), or be asymptomatic for COVID-19 upon admission (46% vs. 10%) (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Most hospitalizations among SARS-CoV-2-positive adults in a recent period were likely attributable to COVID-19. COVID-19-attributable hospitalizations are less common among younger SARS-CoV-2-positive hospitalized adults but still account for nearly three quarters of all admissions among SARS-CoV-2-positive adults in this age group.

Cardiovascular events after invasive pneumococcal disease: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to understand the magnitude of and mechanisms underlying the development of cardiovascular events (CVEs) in patients with invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). We aimed to identify factors that contribute to the occurrence of CVEs within 1 year after admission and discuss implications for patient care.

METHODS

A multicentered cohort study included adult patients from four Dutch hospitals who had a positive blood culture for Streptococcus pneumoniae and any type of clinical manifestation between 2012 and 2020. Disease characteristics and microbiological data were systematically collected from electronic patient files. The main outcome measures were the occurrence of stroke and acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

RESULTS

Of 914 eligible patients, 4.2% experienced a CVE within 1 year after admission for IPD. ACS mainly occurred in the first 2 weeks, whereas stroke developed throughout follow-up. Although ACS was positively associated with disease severity, the sole independent predictor was alcohol abuse (odds ratio [OR] 3.840, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.108-13.303). Although stroke occurred in 6.3% of meningitis cases, the best clinical predictor of stroke was a body temperature >39.5 °C at admission (OR 3.117 [1.154-8.423]). In the adult IPD population aged <70 years, pneumococcal serotypes were the primary predictors of ACS (7F; OR 15.733 [1.812-136.632]) and stroke (22F; OR 7.320 [1.193-44.903]).

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse CVEs were not uncommon after IPD diagnosis and deserve attention, especially in the high-risk groups we identified in our study population. Whether specific serotypes play a role in the development of CVE requires substantiation in further research.

Pathogenic mechanisms of cardiovascular damage in COVID-19

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 is a new infectious disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2). Since the outbreak in December 2019, it has caused an unprecedented world pandemic, leading to a global human health crisis. Although SARS CoV-2 mainly affects the lungs, causing interstitial pneumonia and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, a number of patients often have extensive clinical manifestations, such as gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular damage and renal dysfunction.

PURPOSE

This review article discusses the pathogenic mechanisms of cardiovascular damage in COVID-19 patients and provides some useful suggestions for future clinical diagnosis, treatment and prevention.

METHODS

An English-language literature search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science databases up to 12th April, 2024 for the terms "COVID-19", "SARS CoV-2", "cardiovascular damage", "myocardial injury", "myocarditis", "hypertension", "arrhythmia", "heart failure" and "coronary heart disease", especially update articles in 2023 and 2024. Salient medical literatures regarding the cardiovascular damage of COVID-19 were selected, extracted and synthesized.

RESULTS

The most common cardiovascular damage was myocarditis and pericarditis, hypertension, arrhythmia, myocardial injury and heart failure, coronary heart disease, stress cardiomyopathy, ischemic stroke, blood coagulation abnormalities, and dyslipidemia. Two important pathogenic mechanisms of the cardiovascular damage may be direct viral cytotoxicity as well as indirect hyperimmune responses of the body to SARS CoV-2 infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiovascular damage in COVID-19 patients is common and portends a worse prognosis. Although the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of cardiovascular damage related to COVID-19 are not completely clear, two important pathogenic mechanisms of cardiovascular damage may be the direct damage of the SARSCoV-2 infection and the indirect hyperimmune responses.

The Impact of Cardiovascular Antecedents on the Prognosis of COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients

Background/Objectives: The objective of the study is to analyze the impact of cardiovascular history on mortality in COVID-19 patients, hospitalized in the intensive care unit with indications for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and subsequently mechanical ventilation, without oncological disease. Methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out on a group of 108 critical COVID-19 patients. We compared demographic data, paraclinical and clinical parameters, days of hospitalization, and mortality rate between two groups of patients, one group with a history of cardiovascular disease (81 patients) and a group without a history of cardiovascular disease (27 patients). Results: Patients with cardiovascular antecedents had a higher mortality rate than those without cardiovascular antecedents, presenting severe forms with shorter survival time in the intensive care unit and increased inflammatory evidence. Compared to patients without a history of cardiovascular illness, those with cardiovascular disease had a lower average age, and developed a severe form of COVID-19. Conclusions: Cardiovascular antecedents can worsen the prognosis of patients with COVID-19, requiring a careful screening and multidisciplinary approach.

Acute Cardiac Events in Hospitalized Older Adults With Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection

Importance

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection can cause severe respiratory illness in older adults. Less is known about the cardiac complications of RSV disease compared with those of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Objective

To describe the prevalence and severity of acute cardiac events during hospitalizations among adults aged 50 years or older with RSV infection.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study analyzed surveillance data from the RSV Hospitalization Surveillance Network, which conducts detailed medical record abstraction among hospitalized patients with RSV infection detected through clinician-directed laboratory testing. Cases of RSV infection in adults aged 50 years or older within 12 states over 5 RSV seasons (annually from 2014-2015 through 2017-2018 and 2022-2023) were examined to estimate the weighted period prevalence and 95% CIs of acute cardiac events.

Exposures

Acute cardiac events, identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification or International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification discharge codes, and discharge summary review.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Severe disease outcomes, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission, receipt of invasive mechanical ventilation, or in-hospital death. Adjusted risk ratios (ARR) were calculated to compare severe outcomes among patients with and without acute cardiac events.

Results

The study included 6248 hospitalized adults (median [IQR] age, 72.7 [63.0-82.3] years; 59.6% female; 56.4% with underlying cardiovascular disease) with laboratory-confirmed RSV infection. The weighted estimated prevalence of experiencing a cardiac event was 22.4% (95% CI, 21.0%-23.7%). The weighted estimated prevalence was 15.8% (95% CI, 14.6%-17.0%) for acute heart failure, 7.5% (95% CI, 6.8%-8.3%) for acute ischemic heart disease, 1.3% (95% CI, 1.0%-1.7%) for hypertensive crisis, 1.1% (95% CI, 0.8%-1.4%) for ventricular tachycardia, and 0.6% (95% CI, 0.4%-0.8%) for cardiogenic shock. Adults with underlying cardiovascular disease had a greater risk of experiencing an acute cardiac event relative to those who did not (33.0% vs 8.5%; ARR, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.85-4.32). Among all hospitalized adults with RSV infection, 18.6% required ICU admission and 4.9% died during hospitalization. Compared with patients without an acute cardiac event, those who experienced an acute cardiac event had a greater risk of ICU admission (25.8% vs 16.5%; ARR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.23-1.93) and in-hospital death (8.1% vs 4.0%; ARR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.36-2.31).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study over 5 RSV seasons, nearly one-quarter of hospitalized adults aged 50 years or older with RSV infection experienced an acute cardiac event (most frequently acute heart failure), including 1 in 12 adults (8.5%) with no documented underlying cardiovascular disease. The risk of severe outcomes was nearly twice as high in patients with acute cardiac events compared with patients who did not experience an acute cardiac event. These findings clarify the baseline epidemiology of potential cardiac complications of RSV infection prior to RSV vaccine availability.

Trends in Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Rates and Excess Deaths, 2010-2022

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality increased during the initial years of the COVID-19 pandemic, but whether these trends endured in 2022 is unknown. This analysis describes temporal trends in CVD death rates from 2010 to 2022 and estimates excess CVD deaths from 2020 to 2022.

METHODS

Using national mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System, deaths among adults aged ≥35 years were classified by underlying cause of death International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes for CVD (I00-I99), heart disease (I00-I09, I11, I13, I20-I51), and stroke (I60-I69). Analyses in Joinpoint software identified trends in CVD age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100,000 and estimated the number of excess CVD deaths from 2020 to 2022.

RESULTS

During 2010-2022, 10,951,403 CVD deaths occurred (75.6% heart disease, 16.9% stroke). The national CVD AAMR declined by 8.9% from 2010 to 2019 (456.6-416.0 per 100,000) and then increased by 9.3% from 2019 to 2022 to 454.5 per 100,000, which approximated the 2010 rate (456.7 per 100,000). From 2020 to 2022, 228,524 excess CVD deaths occurred, which was 9% more CVD deaths than expected based on trends from 2010 to 2019. Results varied by CVD subtype and population subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite stabilization of the public health emergency, declines in CVD mortality rates reversed in 2020 and remained high in 2022, representing almost a decade of lost progress and over 228,000 excess CVD deaths. Findings underscore the importance of prioritizing prevention and management of CVD to improve outcomes.

Interatrial Block and Electrocardiographic Markers of Repolarization in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: Classical and Bayesian Analysis

Objective

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular arrhythmias. Several electrophysiological abnormalities on surface electrocardiography (ECG) are associated with AF and ventricular arrhythmias, either as markers of abnormal interatrial conduction or abnormal repolarization. The present study sought to understand whether such ECG markers are more common in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection during the pandemic.

Methods

A total of 87 COVID-19 patients formed the study group, whereas 64 patients who were hospitalized for any reason other than COVID-19 infection served as controls. The frequency of partial and advanced interatrial block (IAB), QT and corrected QT (QTc) durations, QT dispersion (QTd), and T peak-to-end duration (Tpe) were measured from ECGs at admission.

Results

Both partial and advanced IAB were more common in patients with COVID-19, although statistical significance was only observed for advanced IAB (11.5% in COVID-19 patients vs. 0.0% in controls, p=0.005). There were no differences between the groups for QTc, QTd or Tpe. On Bayesian analyses, there was strong evidence favoring an association between COVID-19 and advanced IAB (BF10:16), whereas there was no evidence for an association for partial IAB, QTc, QTd, or Tpe (BF10<1 for all).

Conclusions

Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were more likely to have advanced IAB, which may explain why AF is more frequent in these patients.

Synthesis of cell penetrating peptide sterol coupler and its liposome study on S-mRNA

In order to overcome the current LNP-mRNA delivery system's weakness of poor stability and rapid degradation by nuclease, a novel chol-CGYKK molecule and then the new phospholipid liposome were designed and prepared. A solid phase approach synthesized CGYKK and connected it to cholesterol via a disulfide linker to form the desired chol-CGYKK. Four formulated samples with different proportions of excipients were prepared by freeze-drying cationic liposomes and packaged S-mRNA. The stability test shows that after six months at 4 °C, the encapsulation rate of this novel phospholipid liposome was still approximately 90%, which would significantly improve the storage and transportation requirement. Transmission electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy indicated that the liposomes were spherical and uniformly dispersed. On comparing the levels of mRNA protein expression of the four formulated samples, the S protein vaccine expression of formulated sample 1 was the highest. Uptake by vector cells for formulated sample 1 showed that compared to Lipo2000, and the transfection efficiency was 66.7%. Furthermore, the safety evaluation of the CGYKK and mRNA vaccine liposomes revealed no toxic effects. The in vivo study demonstrated that this novel mRNA vaccine had an immune response. However, it was still not as good as the LNP group right now, but its excellent physicochemical properties, stability, in vitro biological activity, and in vivo efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 provided new strategies for developing the next generation of mRNA delivery system.

COVID Vaccination as a Strategy for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is a known complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection. A clear benefit of COVID-19 vaccination is a reduction mortality; however, COVID-19 vaccination may also prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aim to describe CV pathology associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and describe how COVID-19 vaccination is a strategy for CVD prevention.

RECENT FINDINGS

The risks and benefits of COVID-19 vaccination have been widely studied. Analysis of individuals with and without pre-existing CVD has shown that COVID-19 vaccination can prevent morbidity associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and reduce mortality. COVID-19 vaccination is effective in preventing myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, myopericarditis, and long COVID, all associated with CVD risk factors. Vaccination reduces mortality in patients with pre-existing CVD. Further study investigating ideal vaccination schedules for individuals with CVD should be undertaken to protect this vulnerable group and address new risks from variants of concern.

Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic: Updating Our Approach to Masking in Health Care Facilities

The COVID-19 pandemic has upended societal norms and changed the way the health risks associated with respiratory viral infections are viewed. In this commentary, the authors advocate for mindfulness of continuing areas of uncertainty along with integration of the lessons learned into hospital-based practices to prevent harm to vulnerable patients rather than reverting to suboptimal prepandemic behaviors.

Pathological Interplay and Clinical Complications between COVID-19 and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Overview in 2023

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) involves all organs of the body, of which the interaction with cardiovascular diseases is the most important.

SUMMARY

Numerous studies have reported that COVID-19 patients complicated with cardiovascular comorbidities (hypertension, coronary heart disease, chronic heart failure (HF), cerebrovascular disease) are more likely to develop into critical illness and have higher mortality. Conversely, COVID-19 may also cause myocardial injury in patients through various pathological mechanisms such as direct virus attack on cardiomyocytes, overactivation of immune response, microthrombus formation, which may lead to fatal acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, acute worsening of chronic HF, etc. In addition, the symptoms of the so-called long-COVID may remain in some patients who survived the acute viral infection. Positional tachycardia has been widely reported, and cardiovascular autonomic disorders are thought to play a pathogenic role.

KEY MESSAGE

The review summarizes the interaction between COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease in terms of pathological mechanism, clinical features, and sequelae. Therapeutic and rehabilitation programs after COVID-19 infection are compiled and need to be further standardized in the future.

COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system: a study of pathophysiology and interpopulation variability

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in humans can lead to various degrees of tissue and organ damage, of which cardiovascular system diseases are one of the main manifestations, such as myocarditis, myocardial infarction, and arrhythmia, which threaten the infected population worldwide. These diseases threaten the cardiovascular health of infected populations worldwide. Although the prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has slightly improved with virus mutation and population vaccination, chronic infection, post-infection sequelae, and post-infection severe disease patients still exist, and it is still relevant to study the mechanisms linking COVID-19 to cardiovascular disease (CVD). This article introduces the pathophysiological mechanism of COVID-19-mediated cardiovascular disease and analyzes the mechanism and recent progress of the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and the cardiovascular system from the roles of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), cellular and molecular mechanisms, endothelial dysfunction, insulin resistance, iron homeostasis imbalance, and psychosocial factors, respectively. We also discussed the differences and mechanisms involved in cardiovascular system diseases combined with neocoronavirus infection in different populations and provided a theoretical basis for better disease prevention and management.