Coronary Artery Disease in Young Women After Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer: The WECARE Study

Understanding the spectrum of cardiovascular risk in women - A primer for prevention

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in women worldwide and the lifetime risk of CVD in women is similar to men. However, the pathophysiology of CVD varies between women and men necessitating a sex-specific understanding of cardiovascular (CV) risk. A belief that women have a lower CVD risk than men, and an underrepresentation in clinical research for many years has led to a paucity of evidence in the prevention and management of CVD in women. Many recent efforts have tried to bridge the gap. As a result, we now know that traditional risk factors impact CVD risk differently in women when compared with men. There are also numerous sex-specific and pregnancy related risk factors that modify the risk and can predict the future development of CVD in women. This is important as risk calculators, in general, tend to misclassify risk in young women with nontraditional CVD risk factors. To address this, guidelines have introduced the concept of risk enhancers that can suggest a higher risk. The use of coronary artery calcium score can further accurately delineate risk in these women, leading to an appropriate matching of therapy to underlying risk. This review discusses implementation strategies that are essential to mitigate disparities in CVD outcomes and optimizing CVD risk in women.

Reproductive milestones across the lifespan and cardiovascular disease risk in women

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death for women across the developed and developing world. Beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors, a number of reproductive milestones have been recognized. The goal of this White Paper, issued by the International Menopause Society in conjunction with World Menopause Day 2023, is to highlight female reproductive milestones in terms of potential cardiovascular risk and to review recommendations for minimizing that risk. The primary milestones discussed relate to menstrual cyclicity, adverse pregnancy outcomes, breast cancer treatments and menopause. Each of these categories has a number of permutations that have been shown in observational studies to be associated with increased cardiovascular risks. In current clinical care, recognition of these reproductive milestones has been encouraged so patients can be informed and motivated to engage in primary prevention of CVD early in their life course rather than retrospectively later in life. Options for specifically targeted care with specialist teams are designed to enhance success with risk identification, screening and possible detection of CVD and, optimally, primary or secondary prevention of CVD. Promoting cardiovascular health of women has far-reaching effects for themselves, their families and their progeny. It is time to make women's cardiovascular health a priority.

Interventional cardiology in cancer patients: A position paper from the Portuguese Cardiovascular Intervention Association and the Portuguese Cardio-Oncology Study Group of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology

The field of Cardio-Oncology has grown significantly, especially during the last decade. While awareness of cardiotoxicity due to cancer disease and/or therapies has greatly increased, much of the attention has focused on myocardial systolic disfunction and heart failure. However, coronary and structural heart disease are also a common issue in cancer patients and encompass the full spectrum of cardiotoxicity. While invasive percutaneous or surgical intervention, either is often needed or considered in cancer patients, limited evidence or guidelines are available for dealing with coronary or structural heart disease. The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions consensus document published in 2016 is the most comprehensive document regarding this particular issue, but relevant evidence has emerged since, which render some of its considerations outdated. In addition to that, the recent 2022 ESC Guidelines on Cardio-Oncology only briefly discuss this topic. As a result, the Portuguese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and the Cardio-Oncology Study Group of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology have partnered to produce a position paper to address the issue of cardiac intervention in cancer patients, focusing on percutaneous techniques. A brief review of available evidence is provided, followed by practical considerations. These are based both on the literature as well as accumulated experience with these types of patients, as the authors are either interventional cardiologists, cardiologists with experience in the field of Cardio-Oncology, or both.

Tailored to a Woman's Heart: Gender Cardio-Oncology Across the Lifespan

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Females outnumber males among long-term cancer survivors, primarily as a result of the prevalence of breast cancer. Late cardiovascular effects of cancer develop over several decades, which for many women, may overlap with reproductive and lifecycle events. Thus, women require longitudinal cardio-oncology care that anticipates and responds to their evolving cardiovascular risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

Women may experience greater cardiotoxicity from cancer treatments compared to men and a range of treatment-associated hormonal changes that increase cardiometabolic risk. Biological changes at critical life stages, including menarche, pregnancy, and menopause, put female cancer patients and survivors at a unique risk of cardiovascular disease. Women also face distinct psychosocial and physical barriers to accessing cardiovascular care. We describe the need for a lifespan-based approach to cardio-oncology for women. Cardio-oncology care tailored to women should rigorously consider cancer treatment/outcomes and concurrent reproductive/hormonal changes, which collectively shape quality of life and cardiovascular outcomes.

Trends in Radiation Dose to the Contralateral Breast During Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy

Over 4 million survivors of breast cancer live in the United States, 35% of whom were treated before 2009. Approximately half of patients with breast cancer receive radiation therapy, which exposes the untreated contralateral breast to radiation and increases the risk of a subsequent contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Radiation oncology has strived to reduce unwanted radiation dose, but it is unknown whether a corresponding decline in actual dose received to the untreated contralateral breast has occurred. The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in unwanted contralateral breast radiation dose to inform risk assessment of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast for long-term survivors of breast cancer. Individually estimated radiation absorbed doses to the four quadrants and areola central area of the contralateral breast were estimated for 2,132 women treated with radiation therapy for local/regional breast cancers at age <55 years diagnosed between 1985 and 2008. The two inner quadrant doses and two outer quadrant doses were averaged. Trends in dose to each of the three areas of the contralateral breast were evaluated in multivariable models. The population impact of reducing contralateral breast dose on the incidence of radiation-associated CBC was assessed by estimating population attributable risk fraction (PAR) in a multivariable model. The median dose to the inner quadrants of the contralateral breast was 1.70 Gy; to the areola, 1.20 Gy; and to the outer quadrants, 0.72 Gy. Ninety-two percent of patients received ≥1 Gy to the inner quadrants. For each calendar year of diagnosis, dose declined significantly for each location, most rapidly for the inner quadrants (0.04 Gy/year). Declines in dose were similar across subgroups defined by age at diagnosis and body mass index. The PAR for CBC due to radiation exposure >1 Gy for women <40 years of age was 17%. Radiation dose-reduction measures have reduced dose to the contralateral breast during breast radiation therapy. Reducing the dose to the contralateral breast to <1 Gy could prevent an estimated 17% of subsequent radiation-associated CBCs for women treated under 40 years of age. These dose estimates inform CBC surveillance for the growing number of breast cancer survivors who received radiation therapy as young women in recent decades. Continued reductions in dose to the contralateral breast could further reduce the incidence of radiation-associated CBC.

Radiation therapy in the thoracic region: Radio-induced cardiovascular disease, cardiac delineation and sparing, cardiac dose constraints, and cardiac implantable electronic devices

Radiation therapy in the thoracic region may deliver incidental ionizing radiation to the surrounding healthy structures, including the heart. Radio-induced heart toxicity has long been a concern in breast cancer and Hodgkin's lymphoma and was deemed a long-term event. However, recent data highlight the need to limit the dose to the heart in less favorable thoracic cancers too, such as lung and esophageal cancers in which incidental irradiation led to increased mortality. This article will summarize available cardiac dose constraints in various clinical settings and the types of radio-induced cardiovascular diseases encountered as well as delineation of cardiac subheadings and management of cardiac devices. Although still not completely deciphered, heart dose constraints remain intensively investigated and the mean dose to the heart is no longer the only dosimetric parameter to consider since the left anterior descending artery as well as the left ventricle should also be part of dosimetry constraints.

Integrating subvolume dose and myocardial perfusion imaging parameters to assess the impact of radiation therapy on heart function in breast cancer patients: A comparative analysis between left- and right-sided breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to utilize an innovative method of integrating the 20 subvolume dose of left ventricle and the Tl-201 single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) parameters in patients with left- and right-sided breast cancer after radiation therapy.

METHODS

Female patients with breast cancer underwent SPECT MPI before commencing radiotherapy and 12 months later were enrolled from January 2014 to December 2018. The images of CT simulation and SPECT MPI were integrated into the treatment planning system. The differences of doses and parameters of MPI in all cardiac subvolumes between left- and right-sided breast cancer patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with left-sided breast cancer (n = 61) received a higher radiation dose to the heart, left ventricular, and its territories and subvolumes, compared to patients with right-sided breast cancer (n = 19). The 20-segment analysis also showed statistically significant disparities in the average radiation doses received by the two groups. In different coronary artery territories, the end-diastolic perfusion and end-systolic perfusion showed a decrease in both sides, with no significant differences. However, the wall motion and wall thickening showed a significant decline in subregions within the left- and right-sided coronary artery territories.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates an innovative integrated method combining the left ventricular 20 regional doses with SPECT MPI which shows that left-sided breast cancer patients receive a higher subvolume dose than right-sided breast cancer patients. Further research is needed to confirm the potential impact on heart function after radiotherapy on both sides.

Cardio-Oncology for the Primary Care Provider

Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of mortality among oncologic patients. As cancer therapies continue to evolve and advance, cancer survival rates have been increasing and so has the burden of cardiovascular disease within this population. For this reason, cardio-oncology plays an important role in promoting multidisciplinary care with the primary care provider, oncology, and cardiology. In this review, we discuss the roles of different providers, strategies to monitor patients receiving cardiotoxic therapies, and summarize cancer therapy class-specific toxicities. Continued collaboration among providers and ongoing research related to cardiotoxic cancer therapies will enable patients to receive maximal, evidence-based, comprehensive care.

Evaluation of Cardiac Substructures Exposure of DIBH-3DCRT, FB-HT, and FB-3DCRT in Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer after Breast-Conserving Surgery: An In Silico Planning Study

Left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy can lead to late cardiovascular complications, including ischemic events. To mitigate these risks, cardiac-sparing techniques such as deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) have been developed. However, recent studies have shown that mean heart dose is not a sufficient dosimetric parameter for assessing cardiac exposure. In this study, we aimed to compare the radiation exposure to cardiac substructures for ten patients who underwent hypofractionated radiotherapy using DIBH three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), free-breathing (FB)-3DCRT, and FB helical tomotherapy (HT). Dosimetric parameters of cardiac substructures were analyzed, and the results were statistically compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. This study found a significant reduction in the dose to the heart, left anterior descending coronary artery, and ventricles with DIBH-3DCRT and FB-HT compared to FB-3DCRT. While DIBH-3DCRT was very effective in sparing the heart, in some cases, it provided little or no cardiac sparing. FB-HT can be an interesting treatment modality to reduce the dose to major coronary vessels and ventricles and may be of interest for patients with cardiovascular risks who do not benefit from or cannot perform DIBH. These findings highlight the importance of cardiac-sparing techniques for precise delivery of radiation therapy.

Mechanisms by which statins protect endothelial cells from radiation-induced injury in the carotid artery

Background

The incidental use of statins during radiation therapy has been associated with a reduced long-term risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, the mechanisms by which statins protect the vasculature from irradiation injury remain poorly understood.

Objectives

Identify the mechanisms by which the hydrophilic and lipophilic statins pravastatin and atorvastatin preserve endothelial function after irradiation.

Methods

Cultured human coronary and umbilical vein endothelial cells irradiated with 4 Gy and mice subjected to 12 Gy head-and-neck irradiation were pretreated with statins and tested for endothelial dysfunction, nitric oxide production, oxidative stress, and various mitochondrial phenotypes at 24 and 240 h after irradiation.

Results

Both pravastatin (hydrophilic) and atorvastatin (lipophilic) were sufficient to prevent the loss of endothelium-dependent relaxation of arteries after head-and-neck irradiation, preserve the production of nitric oxide by endothelial cells, and suppress the cytosolic reactive oxidative stress associated with irradiation. However, only pravastatin inhibited irradiation-induced production of mitochondrial superoxide; damage to the mitochondrial DNA; loss of electron transport chain activity; and expression of inflammatory markers.

Conclusions

Our findings reveal some mechanistic underpinnings of the vasoprotective effects of statins after irradiation. Whereas both pravastatin and atorvastatin can shield from endothelial dysfunction after irradiation, pravastatin additionally suppresses mitochondrial injury and inflammatory responses involving mitochondria. Clinical follow-up studies will be necessary to determine whether hydrophilic statins are more effective than their lipophilic counterparts in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients undergoing radiation therapy.

Comparison of Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy and Coronary Angiography Results in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Radiotherapy

Breast cancer is the most common type of malignancy in women and radiotherapy (RT) is an important part of treatment. Although it reduces cancer recurrence, it has been shown to cause accerelerated athnerosclerosis. This study aimed to compare the results of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) for ischemia investigation with coronary angiography (CAG) findings and to investigate the effect of RT on the development of coronary artery disease in breast cancer patients who underwent RT. The results of 660 patients were analyzed and compared with each other in terms of clinical, demographic, laboratory parameters and MPS results. The mean age was 57.5 years and all of them were female. When the groups were compared, the Gensini score and marking of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) area as ischemic area localization were found more, but angiographically, the rate of severe stenosis in the area indicated by MPS was found to be lower in the RT group (p < 0.001). While the sensitivity of MPS in the RT group was 67.5% and non-RT group was 88.5% (p < 0.001), the result of our study shows that the sensitivity of the MPS test is significantly lower in the patient group receiving RT.

Cancer and Postradiotherapy Cardiotoxicity: How to Face Damage in Women’s Hearts?

Cancer and cardiovascular disease are the two main causes of death worldwide in both men and women. In the past decades, survival rate in cancer patients has substantially improved due to new treatments and developments in radiation therapy (RT). In women, breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of cancer death and thoracic RT is a main component of the treatment in many cases. Nevertheless, despite new techniques that limit the area receiving RT, cardiac damage is still an important concern in BC patients. In this review, the following aspects will be addressed: pathophysiology of postradiotherapy heart damage in women with BC; mechanisms, diagnosis and prevention/management of heart damage; and future areas of potential research for radiotherapy injury in women.

Optimal radiotherapy modality sparing for cardiac valves in left-sided breast cancer

Background

The cardiotoxicity caused by radiotherapy is a critical problem in the treatment of patients with breast cancer. The appropriate radiotherapy modality sparing for cardiac valves in left-sided breast cancer has not been well defined. The aim of this study was thus to compare the dosimetric differences in heart and cardiac valves of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), fixed-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to find the optimal radiotherapy modality sparing for cardiac valves in patients with left breast cancer.

Methods

From January 5, 2021, to March 15, 2021, 21 patients with left-sided breast cancer postmastectomy were included in this study, and 3 different plans for adjuvant radiation were created using 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT for each patient. All patients received 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The mean dose (D_mean) of the heart; percentage volume of the heart receiving ≥5 Gy (V₅), ≥30 Gy (V₃₀), and ≥40 Gy (V₄₀); and the D_mean and the near-maximum dose (D_0.03cc) of cardiac valves were extracted from dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and compared. The correlations in dosimetric factors between cardiac valves and the whole heart were analyzed.

Results

IMRT significantly decreased the values of V₅, V₃₀, V₄₀, and D_mean in the whole heart compared to 3D-CRT and VMAT (P<0.001). Among the 3 different plans, IMRT had the lowest radiation dose to the D_mean and the D_0.03cc of the aortic valve (1.27 Gy/1.75 Gy), pulmonary valve (3.44 Gy/6.89 Gy), tricuspid valve (1.02 Gy/1.14 Gy), and mitral valve (0.93 Gy/1.00 Gy). Pearson correlation analysis found that local parameters (D_mean and D_0.03cc) within valves were strongly correlated to the global parameters (V₅, V₃₀, V₄₀, and D_mean) of the heart.

Conclusions

This study revealed that IMRT showed the lowest cardiac valves dose compared with 3D-CRT and VMAT in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. IMRT might be the optimal modality sparing for cardiac valves in this group of patients. Further studies need to be carried out in order to validate the protective role of IMRT on the cardiac valves.

Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer Patients: Mechanisms and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer-related mortality has significantly declined over the past several decades as a result of improved screening, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Although cancer patients and survivors are living longer, there is increased risk of both short-term and long-term cardiovascular complications, including arrhythmia. In this review, we highlight the current evidence detailing the connections between atrial fibrillation and cancer, provide insight into the mechanisms driving this relationship, and share practical considerations for the management of atrial fibrillation in cancer patients and cancer survivors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Atrial fibrillation is an increasingly recognized condition among cancer patients, with epidemiological data showing increased incidence and worse outcomes in patients with cancer. Studies also describe a bidirectional relationship between cancer and atrial fibrillation, attributable in part to shared risk factors but also potentially due to shared biology. Cancer treatment-associated arrhythmia is an active area of investigation, with ongoing research to identify the mechanisms and pathophysiology behind this phenomenon. Furthermore, management of atrial fibrillation in patients with cancer presents unique challenges, particularly in management of anti-coagulation. Cancer patients have increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation due to the shared risk factors and biology of the two conditions. Moreover, various cancer therapeutics are known to be arrhythmogenic; however, mechanisms remain unclear. Further research is needed to better understand the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation in cancer patient in order to establish prevention and treatment strategies specific to this population.

Myocardial Ischemia Related to Common Cancer Therapy-Prevention Insights

Modern antineoplastic therapy improves survival and quality of life in cancer patients, but its indisputable benefits are accompanied by multiple and major side effects, such as cardiovascular ones. Endothelial dysfunction, arterial spasm, intravascular thrombosis, and accelerated atherosclerosis affect the coronary arteries, leading to acute and chronic coronary syndromes that negatively interfere with the oncologic treatment. The cardiac toxicity of antineoplastic agents may be mitigated by using adequate prophylactic measures. In the absence of dedicated guidelines, our work provides the most comprehensive, systematized, structured, and up-to-date analyses of the available literature focusing on measures aiming to protect the coronary arteries from the toxicity of cancer therapy. Our work facilitates the implementation of these measures in daily practice. The ultimate goal is to offer clinicians the necessary data for a personalized therapeutic approach for cancer patients receiving evidence-based oncology treatments with potential cardiovascular toxicity.

Heart Sparing Radiotherapy Techniques in Breast Cancer: A Focus on Deep Inspiration Breath Hold

Adjuvant radiation therapy is a critical component of breast cancer management. However, when breast cancer patients receive incidental radiation to the heart, there is an increased risk of cardiac disease and mortality. This is most common for patients with left-sided breast cancers and those receiving nodal irradiation as part of treatment. The overall risk of cardiac toxicity increases 4–16% with each Gray increase in mean heart radiation dose, with data suggesting that no lower limit exists which would eliminate cardiac risk entirely. Radiation techniques have improved over time, leading to lower cardiac radiation exposure than in the past. This decline is expected to reduce the incidence of radiation-induced heart dysfunction in patients. Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is one such technique that was developed to reduce the risk of cardiac death and coronary events. DIBH is a non-invasive approach that capitalizes on the natural physiology of the respiratory cycle to increase the distance between the heart and the therapeutic target throughout the course of radiation therapy. DIBH has been shown to decrease the mean incidental radiation doses to the heart and left anterior descending coronary artery by approximately 20–70%. In this review, we summarize different techniques for DIBH and discuss recent data on this technique.

Comparison of Heart and Lung Doses According to Tumor Bed Boost Techniques in Early-Stage Left-Sided Breast Cancer: Simultaneous Integrated Boost versus Sequential Boost

Background and Objectives: The boost dose to the tumor bed after whole breast irradiation (WBI) can be divided into sequential boost (SEQ) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). SIB using modern radiation therapy (RT) techniques, such as volumetric modulated arc therapy, allow the delivery of a highly conformal dose to the target volume and has a salient ability to spare at-risk organs. This study aimed to compare the radiation dose delivered to the heart and lungs according to boost technique and tumor bed location. Materials and Methods: RT planning data of 20 patients with early-stage left-sided breast cancer were used in this study. All patients were treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy after breast-conserving surgery with a sentinel lymph node biopsy. For each patient, two different plans, whole breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost (WBI-SIB) and sequential boost after WBI (WBI-SEQ), were generated. To compare the dose received by each organ at risk (OAR), dose-volume histogram data were analyzed. The mean dose (Dmean) and volume of each organ that received x Gy (Vx) were calculated and compared. Results: For the heart, the V10 was lower for the WBI-SIB plan than for the WBI-SEQ plan (5.223 ± 1.947% vs. 6.409 ± 2.545%, p = 0.008). For the left lung, the V5 was lower in the WBI-SIB plan than for the WBI-SEQ plan (27.385 ± 3.871% vs. 32.092 ± 3.545%, p < 0.001). The Dmean for the heart and left lung was lower for the WBI-SIB plan than for the WBI-SEQ plan (heart: 339.745 ± 46.889 cGy vs. 413.030 ± 52.456 cGy, p < 0.001; left lung: 550.445 ± 65.094 cGy vs. 602.270 ± 55.775 cGy, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The WBI-SIB plan delivered lower radiation doses to the heart and left lung than the WBI-SEQ plan in terms of Dmean and low-dose volume in hypofractionated RT of early-stage left-sided breast cancer patients. Furthermore, a large radiation dose per day may be advantageous, considering the radiobiologic aspects of breast cancer. Long-term follow-up data are needed to determine whether the dosimetric advantages of the WBI-SIB plan can lead to clinically improved patient outcomes and reduced late side effects.

Cardiac Function after Modern Radiation Therapy with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy or Helical Tomotherapy for Advanced Left-Breast Cancer Receiving Regional Nodal Irradiation

Background: Protecting cardiac function in patients with advanced left-breast cancer receiving radiation therapy (RT) with regional nodal irradiation (RNI) is an important issue. Modern RT techniques can limit cardiac exposure. The aim of this study was to explore the association be-tween cardiac dose and cardiac function. Methods: Between 2017 and 2020, we retrospectively reviewed left-breast cancer patients who received adjuvant RT, including RNI with either volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or helical tomotherapy (HT). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed by echocardiography before RT and 1 year after RT to detect any early deterioration in cardiac systolic function. Results: A total of 30 eligible patients were enrolled. The median follow-up time from the initiation of RT was 3.9 years (range 0.6–5 years). Seventeen patients received VMAT, and the other 13 patients received HT. The median RT dose was 55 Gray (Gy), and the mean heart dose was 3.73 Gy (range 1.95–9.36 Gy). The median LVEF before and after RT was 68% and 68.5%, respectively. No obvious deterioration was found. There was no association between cardiac dose (mean heart dose, V5–V30) and LVEF (change in values or post-RT). Conclusions: For left-breast cancer patients undergoing RT with RNI, VMAT, or HT can be used to limit cardiac exposure. Cardiac function as evaluated by LVEF revealed no obvious deterioration after RT in our patients, and no association was found between cardiac dose and LVEF in those treated with either VMAT or HT in early cardiac surveillance.

The p53 Transactivation Domain 1-Dependent Response to Acute DNA Damage in Endothelial Cells Protects against Radiation-Induced Cardiac Injury

Thoracic radiation therapy can cause endothelial injury in the heart, leading to cardiac dysfunction and heart failure. Although it has been demonstrated that the tumor suppressor p53 functions in endothelial cells to prevent the development of radiation-induced myocardial injury, the key mechanism(s) by which p53 regulates the radiosensitivity of cardiac endothelial cells is not completely understood. Here, we utilized genetically engineered mice that express mutations in p53 transactivation domain 1 (TAD1) (p5325,26) or mutations in p53 TAD1 and TAD2 (p5325,26,53,54) specifically in endothelial cells to study the p53 transcriptional program that protects cardiac endothelial cells from ionizing radiation in vivo. p5325,26,53,54 loses the ability to drive transactivation of p53 target genes after irradiation while p5325,26 can induce transcription of a group of non-canonical p53 target genes, but not the majority of classic radiation-induced p53 targets critical for p53-mediated cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. After 12 Gy whole-heart irradiation, we found that both p5325,26 and p5325,26,53,54 sensitized mice to radiation-induced cardiac injury, in contrast to wild-type p53. Histopathological examination suggested that mutation of TAD1 contributes to myocardial necrosis after whole-heart irradiation, while mutation of both TAD1 and TAD2 abolishes the ability of p53 to prevent radiation-induced heart disease. Taken together, our results show that the transcriptional program downstream of p53 TAD1, which activates the acute DNA damage response after irradiation, is necessary to protect cardiac endothelial cells from radiation injury in vivo.

Particle Therapy for Breast Cancer

Particle therapy has received increasing attention in the treatment of breast cancer due to its unique physical properties that may enhance patient quality of life and reduce the late effects of therapy. In this review, we will examine the rationale for the use of proton and carbon therapy in the treatment of breast cancer and highlight their potential for sparing normal tissue injury. We will discuss the early dosimetric and clinical studies that have been pursued to date in this domain before focusing on the remaining open questions limiting the widespread adoption of particle therapy.