Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation on Recurrent Hospitalization: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Cardiovascular Hospitalizations and Resource Use Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Background Over the next few years, atrial fibrillation (AF)-related morbidity and costs will increase significantly. Thus, it is prudent to examine the impact of AF treatment on health care resource use. This study examined the impact of AF ablation on hospitalization, length of stay, and resource use for patients undergoing AF ablation in a multihospital system. Methods and Results In an observational analysis, outcomes of total, cardiovascular, and AF hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and length of stay were compared for 3417 patients between 12 months before and 24 months following AF ablation. Use of electrical cardioversions and antiarrhythmic use were also compared 1 year before to 2 years after AF ablation. There were fewer total (0.7±1.3 versus 0.3±0.7; P<0.001), cardiovascular (0.7±1.2 versus 0.2±0.6; P<0.001), and AF (0.6±1.1 versus 0.1±0.3; P<0.001) hospitalizations and emergency department visits (0.8±2.1 versus 0.4±0.9; P<0.001) per patient-year for the 2 years following AF ablation compared with 1 year before. Average length of stay per patient-year (1.4±7.9 versus 3.6±5.3 days; P<0.0001), the percentage of patients on antiarrhythmic therapy (21.2% versus 58.5%; P<0.0001), and those undergoing electrical cardioversions (16.1% versus 28.1%; P<0.0001) were lower 2 years following AF ablation versus 1 year before. Conclusions We noted a decrease in total, cardiovascular, and AF hospitalizations and health care resource use during the 2-year period after index AF ablation, compared with the 1 year before. AF ablation may portend a decline in patient morbidity and health care costs.

Impact of a dedicated atrial fibrillation clinic on diagnosis-to-ablation time

Background

Outcomes following catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) improve as the diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) shortens. Use of a protocol-based integrated care model through a dedicated atrial fibrillation clinic (AFC) may serve to standardize treatment pathways and decrease DAT.

Objective

To evaluate the DAT and clinical characteristics of patients with AF referred from an AFC vs a conventional electrophysiology clinic (EC).

Methods

Retrospective analysis was completed in consecutive patients undergoing index AF ablation at Riverside Methodist Hospital in 2019 with minimum 1 year follow-up. Patients were categorized based off their CA referral source (AFC vs EC) and where the initial visit following index diagnosis of AF occurred (AFC vs EC).

Results

A total of 182 patients (mean age 65 years, 64% male) were reviewed. Patients referred from an AFC (21%) had a median DAT of 342 days (interquartile range [IQR], 125-855 days) compared to patients referred from EC (79%) with a median DAT of 813 days (IQR, 241-1444 days; P = .01). Patients with their index visit following AF diagnosis occurring in the AFC (9%) had significantly shorter median DAT (127 days [IQR, 95-188 days]) compared to EC (91%) (789 days [IQR, 253-1503 days]; P = .002). Patients with DAT <1 year had lower AF recurrence than patients with DAT >1 year (P = .04, hazard ratio = 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.3418-1.000).

Conclusion

DAT is a modifiable factor that may affect CA outcomes. Significant reductions in DAT were observed in patients evaluated through a dedicated AF clinic.

Longitudinal risk of death, hospitalizations for atrial fibrillation, and cardiovascular events following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a cohort study

AIMS

Population studies reporting contemporary long-term outcomes following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) are sparse.We evaluated long-term clinical outcomes following AF ablation and examined variation in outcomes by age, sex, and the presence of heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified 30 601 unique patients (mean age 62.7 ± 11.8 years, 30.0% female) undergoing AF ablation from 2008 to 2017 in Australia and New Zealand using nationwide hospitalization data. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and rehospitalizations for AF or flutter, repeat AF ablation, and cardioversion. Secondary outcomes were rehospitalizations for other cardiovascular events. During 124 858.7 person-years of follow-up, 1900 patients died (incidence rate 1.5/100 person-years) with a survival probability of 93.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 92.6-93.4%) by 5 years and 84.0% (95% CI 82.4-85.5%) by 10 years. Rehospitalizations for AF or flutter (13.3/100 person-years), repeat ablation (5.9/100 person-years), and cardioversion (4.5/100 person-years) were common, with respective cumulative incidence of 49.4% (95% CI 48.4-50.4%), 28.1% (95% CI 27.2-29.0%), and 24.4% (95% CI 21.5-27.5%) at 10 years post-ablation. Rehospitalizations for stroke (0.7/100 person-years), heart failure (1.1/100 person-years), acute myocardial infarction (0.4/100 person-years), syncope (0.6/100 person-years), other arrhythmias (2.5/100 person-years), and new cardiac device implantation (2.0/100 person-years) occurred less frequently. Elderly patients and those with comorbid heart failure had worse survival but were less likely to undergo repeat ablation, while long-term outcomes were comparable between the sexes.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing AF ablations had good long-term survival, a low incidence of rehospitalizations for stroke or heart failure, and about half remained free of rehospitalizations for AF or flutter, including for repeat AF ablation, or cardioversion.

Impact of COVID-19 on patients awaiting ablation for atrial fibrillation

Objective

Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation services were significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to evaluate a symptom-based clinician prioritisation scheme for waiting list management compared with patient-completed quality of life (QoL) scores. We also sought to understand factors influencing QoL, particularly the impact of COVID-19, on patients awaiting AF ablation, via a bespoke questionnaire.

Methods

Patients awaiting AF ablation were sent two QoL questionnaires (Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy of Life (AFEQT) and EuroQol 5D (EQ5D-5L)) and the bespoke questionnaire. At a separate time point, patients were categorised as C1—urgent, C2—priority or C3—routine by their cardiologist based on review of clinic letters.

Results

There were 118 patients included with priority categorisation available for 86 patients. Median AFEQT scores were lower in C2 (30.4; 17.2–51.9) vs C3 patients (56.5; 32.1–74.1; p<0.01). Unplanned admission occurred in 3 patients in C3 with AFEQT scores of <40. Although 65 patients had AF symptoms during the pandemic, 43.1% did not seek help where they ordinarily would have. An exercise frequency of ≥3–4 times a week was associated with higher AFEQT (56.5; 41.2–74.1; p<0.001) and EQ5D (0.84; 0.74–0.88; p<0.0001) scores.

Conclusion

The QoL of patients awaiting AF ablation is impaired and AFEQT helps to identify patients at risk of admission, over and above physician assessment. COVID-19 influenced patients seeking medical attention with symptomatic AF when they normally would. Regular exercise is associated with better QoL in patients awaiting AF ablation.

Prevalence and Assessment of Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In this study, we sought to estimate the prevalence of concomitant sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and to systematically evaluate how SDB is assessed in this population.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase and Cinahl databases through August 2020 for studies reporting on SDB in a minimum 100 patients with AF. For quantitative analysis, studies were required to have systematically assessed for SDB in consecutive AF patients. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated with the use of the random effects model. Weighted mean differences and odds ratios were calculated when possible to assess the strength of association between baseline characteristics and SDB.

RESULTS

The search yielded 2758 records, of which 33 studies (n = 23,894 patients) met the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis and 13 studies (n = 2660 patients) met the meta-analysis criteria. The pooled SDB prevalence based on an SDB diagnosis cutoff of apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5/h was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70%-86%; P < 0.001). For moderate-to-severe SDB (AHI ≥ 15/h), the pooled SDB prevalence was 40% (95% CI 32%-48%; P < 0.001). High degrees of heterogeneity were observed (I² = 96% and 94%, respectively; P < 0.001). Sleep testing with the use of poly(somno)graphy or oximetry was the most common assessment tool used (in 22 studies, 66%) but inconsistent diagnostic thresholds were used.

CONCLUSIONS

SDB is highly prevalent in patients with AF. Wide variation exists in the diagnostic tools and thresholds used to detect concomitant SDB in AF. Prospective systematic testing for SDB in unselected cohorts of AF patients may be required to define the true prevalence of SDB in this population.

Clinical outcomes following rhythm control for atrial fibrillation: is early better?

Introduction: An integral aspect of atrial fibrillation (AF) management involves better symptom control, incorporating a rate control, rhythm control, or a combination strategy. The 2020 ESC Guidelines suggest that rhythm control strategy should be recommended for symptomatic patients, to mitigate their symptoms and improve the quality of life. However, adequately powered randomized control trials and prospective 'real-world' registries are needed to fully assess the impact of early rhythm control strategies on clinical outcomes in patients with AF.Objective: In this narrative review, we discuss clinical outcomes following rhythm management approach among patients with AF, considering the effectiveness of an early intervention strategy.Expert opinion: Patients involvement and shared decision-making are crucial when deciding the optimal management strategy among patients with AF. For those with newly diagnosed symptomatic AF, an early invasive approach such as catheter ablation may have a role in preventing AF progression and subsequent pathophysiological changes.

Limited duration of antiarrhythmic drug use for newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in a nationwide population under age 65

INTRODUCTION

Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are commonly used for the treatment of newly diagnosed symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), however initial AAD choice, duration of therapy, rates of discontinuation, and factors associated with a durable response to therapy are poorly understood. This study assesses the initial choice and duration of antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the first 2 years after diagnosis of AF in a younger, commercially insured population.

METHODS

A large nationally representative sample of patients age 20-64 was studied using the IBM MarketScan Database. Patients who started an AAD within 90 days of AF diagnosis with continuous enrollment for 1-year pre-index diagnosis and 2 years post-index were included. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine factors associated with AAD discontinuation.

RESULTS

Flecainide was used most frequently (26.8%), followed by amiodarone (22.5%), dronedarone (18.3%), sotalol (15.8%), and propafenone (14.0%), with other AADs used less frequently. Twenty-two percent of patients who started on an AAD underwent ablation within 2 years, with 79% discontinuing the AAD after ablation. Ablation was the strongest predictor of AAD discontinuation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.61-1.80), followed by the male gender (HR, 1.10; CI: 1.02-1.19). Older patients (HR, 0.76; CI: 0.72-0.80; reference age 18-49) and those with comorbidities, including cardiomyopathy (HR, 075; CI: 0.61-0.91), diabetes (HR, 0.83; CI: 0.75-0.91), and hypertension (HR, 0.87; CI: 0.81-0.94) were less likely to discontinue AADs.

CONCLUSION

Only 31% of patients remained on the initial AAD at 2 years, with a mean duration of initial therapy 7.6 months before discontinuation.

Incidence and predictors of hospitalization in patients with atrial fibrillation: results from the Chinese atrial fibrillation registry study

Background

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent a high risk of hospitalization, which has not been paid much attention to in practice. Therefore, we aimed to assess the incidence, causes and predictors of hospitalization in AF patients.

Methods

From August 2011 to December 2017, a total number of 20,172 AF patients from the Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry (China-AF) Study were prospectively selected for this study. We described the incidence, causes of hospitalization by age groups and sex. The Fine-Gray competing risk model was employed to identify predictors of first all-cause and first cause-specific hospitalization.

Results

After a mean follow-up of 37.3 ± 20.4 months, 7,512 (37.2%) AF patients experienced one or more hospitalizations. The overall incidence of all-cause hospitalization was 24.0 per 100 patient-years. Patients aged < 65 years were predominantly hospitalized for AF (42.1% of the total hospitalizations); while patients aged 65–74 and ≥ 75 years were mainly hospitalized for non-cardiovascular diseases (43.6% and 49.3%, respectively). We found patients complicated with heart failure (HF)[hazard ratio (HR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.18], established coronary artery disease (CAD) (HR 1.24, 95%CI 1.17–1.33), ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) (HR 1.22, 95%CI 1.15–1.30), diabetes (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.08–1.20), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.02–1.62), gastrointestinal disorder (HR 1.37, 95%CI 1.21–1.55), and renal dysfunction (HR 1.24, 95%CI 1.09–1.42) had higher risks of hospitalization.

Conclusions

More than one-third of AF patients included in this study were hospitalized at least once during over 3-year follow-up. The main cause for hospitalization among the elderly patients (≥ 65 years) is non-cardiovascular diseases rather than AF. Multidisciplinary management of comorbidities should be advocated to reduce hospitalization in AF patients older than 65 years old.

Clinical Registryhttp://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=5831. Unique identifier: ChiCTR-OCH-13003729. The registration date is October 22, 2013.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-01951-5.

Atrial Fibrillation (Part 2) - Catheter Ablation

More than 20 years since its initial use, catheter ablation has become a routinely performed procedure for the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Initially based on the electrical isolation of pulmonary veins in patients with paroxysmal AF, subsequent advances in the understanding of pathophysiology led to additional techniques not only to achieve better results, but also to treat patients with persistent forms of arrhythmia, as well as patients with structural heart disease and heart failure.

Differences in Healthcare Use Between Patients With Persistent and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter-Based Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Population-Based Cohort Study From Ontario, Canada

Background Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing catheter-based AF ablation have lower success rates than those with paroxysmal AF. We compared healthcare use and clinical outcomes between patients according to their AF subtypes. Methods and Results Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation were prospectively identified from a population-based registry in Ontario, Canada. Via linkage with administrative databases, we performed a retrospective analysis comparing the following outcomes between patients with persistent and paroxysmal AF: healthcare use (defined as AF-related hospitalizations/emergency room visits), periprocedural complications, and mortality. Multivariable Poisson modeling was performed to compare the rates of AF-related and all-cause hospitalizations/emergency room visits in the year before versus after ablation. Between April 2012 and March 2016, there were 3768 consecutive patients who underwent first-time AF ablation, of whom 1040 (27.6%) had persistent AF. The mean follow-up was 1329 days. Patients with persistent AF had higher risk of AF-related hospitalization/emergency room visits (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.09-1.34), mortality (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.15-2.63), and periprocedural complications (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.02-1.75) than those with paroxysmal AF. In the overall cohort, there was a 48% reduction in the rate of AF-related hospitalization/emergency room visits in the year after versus before ablation (rate ratio [RR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.48-0.56). This reduction was observed for patients with paroxysmal (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.41-0.50) and persistent (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.87) AF. Conclusions Although patients with persistent AF had higher risk of adverse outcomes than those with paroxysmal AF, ablation was associated with a favorable reduction in downstream AF-related healthcare use, irrespective of AF type.

Trends and predictors of early ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in a Nationwide population under age 65: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an effective treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). However practice patterns and patient factors associated with referral for CA within the first 12 months after diagnosis are poorly characterized. This study examined overall procedural trends and factors predictive of catheter ablation for newly-diagnosed atrial fibrillation in a young, commercially-insured population.

METHODS

A large nationally-representative sample of patients age 20 to 64 from years 2010 to 2016 was studied using the IBM MarketScan® Commercial Database. Patients were included with a new diagnosis of AF in the inpatient or outpatient setting with continuous enrollment for at least 1 year pre and post index visit. Patients were excluded if they had prior history of AF or had filled an anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) in the pre-index period.

RESULTS

Early CA increased from 5.0% in 2010 to 10.5% in 2016. Patients were less likely to undergo CA if they were located in the Northeast (OR: 0.80, CI: 0.73-0.88) or North Central (OR: 0.91, CI: 0.83-0.99) regions (compared with the West), had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores, or had Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score of 3 or greater (OR: 0.61; CI: 0.51-0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

CA within 12 months for new-diagnosed AF increased significantly from 2010 to 2016, with most patients still trialed on an AAD prior to CA. Patients are less likely to be referred for early CA if they are located in the Northeast and North Central regions, have more comorbidities, or higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores.

Comparison of the Effect of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation on All-Cause Hospitalization in Patients With Versus Without Heart Failure (from the Nationwide Readmission Database)

Catheter ablation (CA) is associated with reduced arrhythmia recurrence and improved quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Heart failure (HF) is common in patients with AF and is associated with a high hospitalization burden. The real-world association between CA and rates of subsequent hospitalization in patients with AF and HF has not been well studied. Patients who underwent CA for AF during the middle 4 months of each year 2010 to 2015 were identified using the Nationwide Readmission Database. Patients were grouped according to the HF status and HF patients were stratified to reduced versus preserved ejection fraction (EF) using ICD-9 codes. Rates of all-cause hospitalization 120 days before and after index admission were compared using the McNemar's test, before and after matching for baseline characteristics. A total of 10,966 patients met inclusion criteria, including 1,950 with HF. In the HF group, all-cause hospitalization rates changed from 45.8% before CA to 33.2% after (p <0.001). Corresponding rates for non-HF patients were 23.8% and 19.7% (p< 0.001) with a greater relative reduction in hospitalizations seen in the HF group (27.5% vs 17.2%; p value <0.001). The difference in relative reduction persisted after adjustment by propensity score matching. The relative reduction in hospitalization rates was similar in HF patients with reduced and preserved EF with 25.2% and 28.5%, respectively. In conclusion, CA for AF was followed by a significant reduction in all-cause hospitalization rates. Patients with HF, regardless of EF, showed a greater reduction in admissions.